Next Article in Journal
Demand Side Management Strategy for Multi-Objective Day-Ahead Scheduling Considering Wind Energy in Smart Grid
Next Article in Special Issue
Research on ZVS Phase-Shifted Full-Bridge Broadband Inverter Based on Auxiliary Current Source
Previous Article in Journal
Assessment of Energy Efficiency Measures in Food Cold Supply Chains: A Dairy Industry Case Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
NPC Seven-Level Single-Phase Inverter with DC-Link Voltage Balancing, Input Voltage Boosting, and AC Power Decoupling
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

High-Voltage Power Supply for High Repetitive Rate Marx Generator with Quasi-Resonant Zero-Current Switching Transistor Control Algorithm

by
Krzysztof Pachowicz
Measurement and Information Systems, Institute of Theory of Electrical Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, 00-662 Warsaw, Poland
Energies 2022, 15(19), 6902; https://doi.org/10.3390/en15196902
Submission received: 9 August 2022 / Revised: 11 September 2022 / Accepted: 19 September 2022 / Published: 21 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Design, Optimization and Applications of Power Converters)

Abstract

:
Due to having a number of advantages, Marx generators are still the most widely used devices for generating high-voltage pulses in many fields of science and technology. To ensure their proper operation, especially when the generation of many frequent, highly repetitive pulses is required, a highly efficient high-voltage power supply is needed. The paper describes a specially developed power supply (input voltage 48 V DC, output voltage up to 50 kV) based on the conventional Full Bridge topology with two high-frequency high-voltage transformers and a 6-stage voltage multiplier. In order to avoid many problems caused by low coupling between primary and secondary windings of the transformers and the large parasitic capacitances of the secondary windings, a special quasi-resonant zero-current switching transistor control algorithm with variable switching frequency (dependent on output load) was developed. In the described method, the energy is supplied to the transformer in short pulses, when a pair of diagonal transistors of the full-bridge converter were turned on. Then, the freewheeling state is maintained until all of the energy stored in the leakage inductance of the transformer has been transferred to the secondary side, which means that the current in the primary windings drops to zero. This approach reduces energy losses, electromagnetic disturbances and prevents current distortion in primary winding.

1. Introduction

The generation of high-voltage pulses is needed for carrying out a variety of tests and research. These concern not only the simulation of lightning discharges [1] or dielectric strength tests, but also the acceleration of particles [2,3,4,5], the generation of strong X-rays [6], high-power microwaves [7], biological applications [8] or food processing [9,10]. Marx generators are very often used in such applications. This type of device has a number of advantages: a simple construction, low cost of components, simple voltage regulation and expandability.
Problems may arise when it is necessary to generate many highly repetitive pulses with a high frequency, exceeding 1 pulse per second. By analyzing the construction of a conventional Marx generator (Figure 1), it can be seen why this task is quite difficult to accomplish: the resistance of the resistors connecting the capacitors in parallel in the charging phase (Figure 1a) must be much higher than the resistance of the spark gaps in the discharge phase (Figure 1b). Otherwise, the efficiency of the generator will drop significantly or the device will not work at all. On the other hand, the high resistance of these resistors increases the time constant of the system during charging, which does not allow all the capacitors to be recharged in a sufficiently short time. Therefore, in such applications instead of resistors, inductors [10] are often used, or solutions with diodes in the charging circuit and high-voltage transistors as triggers [11].
An additional problem is the development of an appropriately efficient power supply. In order for the Marx generator to function properly, each of the stages (each of the capacitors) should be charged to a sufficiently high voltage needed to break down the spark gap. It should also be noted that a large number of stages reduces the efficiency of the device and the speed of its operation. Therefore, it is desirable that the power supply should generate the highest possible voltage. This causes a number of problems. The first is the performance of the power supply. The output current of such a device should be high enough to charge the generator capacitors to a sufficiently high voltage in an appropriately short time. In addition, the power supply should enable simple adjustment of the output voltage (preferably in a digital way), have a current limitation, compact dimensions and low weight.
For this purpose, high-frequency transformer-based converters are most commonly used. A literature review performed in the area of high-voltage power supplies for rapid capacitor charging showed that in most cases, topologies with full-bridge converters are used [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19] due to the versatility of this topology and the possibility of implementing various control algorithms.
In [12,13,14], a simple hard-switched duty cycle control method was used, but this way of control may cause significant electromagnetic disturbance and large power losses [20]. Therefore, a method with phase-shifted modulation is much more often used [15,16]. In a large number of applications, a resonant converter can be found [17,18]. This method has several benefits. The main advantage is that switching of the transistors occurs in a deenergized state, which significantly reduces the losses and the electromagnetic disturbances caused by this process. However, the development of the resonant converters is problematic, especially when transformers with high parasitic capacitance are used.
An interesting solution was described in [19] where a series connection of the DC-DC converters (double-boost and isolated resonant) was used.
In high-voltage power supplies, solutions involving only one transformer and a simple rectifier are not used often. To increase the voltage, popular solutions include the usage of several transformers with separated rectifiers connected in series [14], voltage multipliers such as the Villard cascade [17] or a combination of these solutions [19] where SiC MOSFETs are also used.
The multitude of solutions shows that the problem of building high-voltage power supplies, in particular for rapid charging of Marx generators, is not a trivial matter.
The high-frequency high-voltage transformer is the most critical and key element of the power supply. However, due to the large number of turns of the secondary winding, such transformers will have a large value of parasitic capacitances and thus a low value of the resonance frequency.
The phenomenon of parasitic capacities is usually undesirable, as it causes a number of problems related to high-voltage high-frequency transformers, which cannot be ignored and necessitate a change in the approach to the design of HV power supplies [21]. These capacities cause distortions of the currents flowing in the primary and secondary windings of the transformer, causing the occurrence of higher harmonics of these currents, increasing energy losses both in the windings related to the winding resistance (caused by a higher current value and the skin effect), losses on semiconductor elements and in the power supply [22], forcing additional cooling or increasing the size of the elements used, including the transformer core [23,24]. Moreover, this phenomenon may also cause the occurrence of electromagnetic disturbances [22,25] and difficulties with control (especially in the case of resonant converters), and affect the output voltage of the transformer.
The article presents a power supply that uses a special methodology of designing and controlling transistors, which significantly reduces problems related to parasitic capacitance that occur in transformers, facilitates the process of designing the power supply and increases its reliability.

2. Parasitic Capacitance in the Secondary Winding

In cases of low-voltage low-power high-frequency transformers, a value of the parasitic capacitance is usually less than 1 pF. Due to the large area of the windings and the core used in high-power transformers, this value can reach several pF. However, due to the low voltage, this is not a big problem for this type of component. For high-voltage high-frequency transformers, parasitic capacitance can reach much higher values of tens of pF [26] which, combined with a high generated voltage, require a large amount of energy to charge them.
Transformers with high parasitic capacitance (Figure 2) are characterized by a high value of current already in the idle state, because a significant part of the energy supplied to the primary winding is absorbed only for charging the parasitic capacitances in the secondary winding. This energy is greater the higher the voltage at the transformer output, which reduces the transformer efficiency [22,26].
In order to demonstrate this problem, a simplified transformer model was prepared (Figure 3), in which all of the parasitic capacitances of secondary winding are presented as a one capacitance (Cpar) connected in parallel with this winding [27,28,29,30]. The primary winding was supplied with 10 V, 10 kHz rectangular voltage. The secondary winding was connected to a discharged 10 nF capacitor by Graetz rectifier.
The simulation was performed in LTSpice—high performance SPICE simulator soft-ware. Despite certain inaccuracies of the built-in models in the program and the developed transformer simplification, the model sufficiently presents the described problem.
The simulation results (Figure 4) show that with an increase in output voltage the current used to charge the parasitic capacitances increases, reducing the current that can be used for charging the load capacitor. Thus, the current flowing in the primary winding is increasingly the resonant current flowing between the parasitic capacitances of the secondary winding and the dissipation inductance, and it causes a significant additional load of the transformer and a much greater current flowing in the primary winding, it increases energy losses.
Therefore, many methods have been developed to help at least roughly estimate the capacitances values, both in classical [24,31] and simulation [26,27,32] methods, to decrease this problem in transformers through the use of appropriate winding techniques, as well as to predict the possible impact of this phenomenon on the operation of the device, and select the appropriate design.
Based on these considerations, it can be concluded that the self-resonant frequency of the transformer should be raised as high as possible by reducing the parasitic capacitances and inductance of the secondary winding, and thus the winding (in particular the secondary winding) should contain as few turns as possible. Therefore, when designing HV transformers, it is necessary to select cores with the largest possible cross-section area and, at the same time, with the lowest possible AL value.
However, even using this approach, the high number of turns in the secondary winding means that the problem of parasitic capacitance cannot be completely eliminated. As a result, the traditional control methods used in low-voltage switching power converters cannot be used, and this forces a change in the approach to designing HV power supplies [22].

3. The Problem of Control

As already mentioned, high-voltage high-frequency transformers are characterized by a high current value already in the idle state, because a significant part of the energy supplied to the primary winding is absorbed only for charging the parasitic capacitances in the secondary winding.
In the case of low-voltage power supplies, the problem of high current in the primary winding is solved by applying a peak or average current limitation, which in fact translates into a reduction in the duty cycle of the signal controlling the operation of the transistors, and thus decreasing the duration of the pulse supplying energy to the transformer. In the case of low-voltage power supplies, this is not a problem. However, in the case of power supplies with a transformer with the problems described, it is not possible to shorten the duration of the pulse supplying energy to the primary winding, because such a power supply may not provide a sufficiently high output voltage. This problem is illustrated by the simulation results presented in Figure 5, where a model with an idealized transformer was compared to a transformer with parasitic capacitance.
In both cases of the simulations presented in Figure 5, a peak current limiter was used. The current value of this limitation was set to approximately 12 A. As can be seen in the case of a model in which a transformer without parasitic capacitance was used, this protection worked only at the beginning of the operation of the power supply (Figure 5a), while in the later phase, even with the maximum duty cycle of the signal controlling the transistors, the current is lower than the value of the protection, and the voltage on the charged capacitor after approximately 12 ms. (Figure 5b) is approaching the voltage resulting from the transformer ratio and its supply voltage (15 kV). On the other hand, using a transformer model that reflects the real element much more closely, taking into account even a small parasitic capacitance of 10 pF, the current in the primary winding is much higher throughout the whole simulation period (Figure 5d), the peak current limiter protection works all the time (Figure 5c), and the voltage on the charged capacitor increases only to approximately 2.5 kV, which is a much lower value than assumed.
The simplest solution to this problem is to increase the value of the current limiter. However, this will result in the flow of a very high current in the primary winding, which may be technically difficult to implement, or not worth doing due to the additional costs of the increase in the cross-section of all connections, or the use of more durable transistors.

4. Quasi-Resonant Algorithm

In the presented power supply, a typical full-bridge topology was used (Figure 6), but to avoid many problems related to the low coupling between primary and secondary windings of the transformer and the large parasitic capacitance, a special transistor control algorithm was developed.
Energy is transferred to the transformer in very short pulses only when a pair of opposing transistors are turned on (Figure 6—M1–M4 and M2–M3). The duration of these pulses is fixed, which ensures that the energy supplied to the transformer will always be constant. Meanwhile, the value of the current in the primary winding is regulated by the dead time, i.e., the time in which energy is not supplied to the transformer.
The disadvantage of using transformers with a large parasitic capacitance is that large current distortions can occur in the primary winding when using phase-shifted control (Figure 7). This will cause problems with controlling the current and increase the losses in the windings, making this method difficult to apply.
To prevent current distortion in the primary winding, increase the efficiency and reduce electromagnetic disturbances, a modified phase-shifted control was used. In the typical phase-shifted method, a pair of transistors (M1 and M2 or M3 and M4) are switched at almost 50% duty and 180 degrees out of phase with each other. The amount of overlap (phase-shift) between diagonal switches determine the amount of energy transferred to the transformer (Figure 8). In the developed method, the supply state looks the same, when a pair of diagonal transistors were turned on (Figure 9a,c). Then, in freewheeling state (in contrast to phase-shifted method), the low side transistor is turned off and only the one high side transistor is still on to ensure a continuous flow of current through the primary winding (Figure 9b,d).
Another modification in relation to the traditional methods is that the freewheeling state is maintained until all of the energy stored in the leakage inductance of the transformer has been transferred to the secondary side, which means that the current in the primary windings drops to zero. After that, the second pair of opposing transistors is switched on and the current starts to flow in the opposite direction through the primary winding. In addition, the developed transistor control algorithm keeps the M1 or M3 (Figure 6) transistors turned on until the current drops to zero, thus creating a quasi-resonant mode of operation. This approach enables a much better use of the transformer core as in each cycle the magnetic flux density reaches the assumed maximum value. Figure 10a shows the transistor control signals and an additional signal indicating the drop of current to zero during the first charging state. The current in the primary winding is presented in Figure 10b.
During this charging phase the transistors are driven with variable frequency dependent on output load and the quasi-resonant algorithm is implemented. However, in this condition there is no possibility to control the charging process. Therefore, a functionality of minimum cycle time has been added. When the load is low (the load capacitor is partially charged) the control algorithm is switched to a fixed frequency, as shown in Figure 10c,d.

5. High-Voltage DC Power Supply

The block schema of the developed high-voltage power supply is presented in Figure 11. The use of a voltage multiplier was chosen because it allows us to decrease the output voltage of high-voltage transformers. This solution reduces problems with isolation and parasitic capacitance of the secondary windings.
Due to the uniqueness of the presented method, none of the ICs available on the market implement it. Therefore, the digital controller was equipped with a Complex Programmable Logic Device (CPLD) which implemented the developed algorithm and functionalities of peek current limiter and overvoltage protection. This way of implementation was chosen due to fast pin to pin performance of CPLD and the ease of creating even complex logic using a diagram or code. The power supply prepared on this basis is presented in Figure 12.
The described power supply is designed to work with a 10-stage Marx generator. In each stage, a 3300 pF capacitor was used, giving a net capacity of 33 nF. The assumed frequency of generating pulses is 3 pulses per second at a voltage of 50 kV per stage. Therefore, the power supply should charge the capacity of all stages within a maximum time of 330 ms.
In order to obtain the required parameters, the power delivery state time was set to 5 μs (Figure 9a,c) and the minimum freewheeling state time (in non-quasi-resonant mode) was set to 20 μs (Figure 9b,d). A longer time of the power delivery state will saturate the transformer core, while shorter will decrease the power supply performance. The opposite is true with minimum free-wheeling state time—a higher value will decrease the performance but a lower will over-load the power source.

6. Experiments

In all the tests performed, a 33 nF high-voltage capacitor was used as a load of the power supply. To measure the output voltage, a high-voltage oscilloscope probe able to measure voltage up to 70 kV DC with a divider ratio of 10,000:1 was used (Figure 13 and Figure 14). The accuracy of used high-voltage probe (North Star VD-100) is better than 0.1% for DC voltage and 1% for 10 Hz–1 Mhz range and fully meets the needs for presented measurements.
Figure 15 presents the developed transistor control algorithm. At the beginning of the charging process (Figure 15a) the frequency of the current is approximately 15 kHz and the transistors are switched when the current drops to zero. In a later stage of charging (Figure 15b), the transistors are switched when the minimal time of one cycle is reached and the frequency of the current is approximately 20 kHz.
The first test was carried out to demonstrate the charging process. As the test results show (Figure 16), the charging time up to 50 kV is approximately 300 ms. This value is lower than the required 330 ms.
The next test was performed with a sequence of ten discharge-charge cycles. In this test the load capacitor was discharged into a resistive load using a spark gap switch controlled by the power supply. The waveform in Figure 17 shows the Marx generator recharging process after generating a sequence of pulses. It can be seen that the recharge time is always lower than 330 ms, and after the discharge, the next charging cycle starts automatically.

7. Conclusions

The quasi-resonant control method is very effective for high-voltage power supplies used to charge capacitors. Its use causes almost all the energy supplied to the transformer, which can be stored in the leakage inductance or auxiliary inductance, to be transferred to the load. It also ensures a much better usage of the transformer core (because in each cycle the maximum assumed value of magnetic flux density is reached), reduction in losses on the transistors (in the developed method, two transistors are always switched in a de-energized state) and reduction in electromagnetic disturbances that may be generated when switching off transistors when a current of non-zero value flows in the primary winding, and the use of the CPLD chip greatly facilitates its implementation.
The rather unusual design of the power supply, using a high frequency converter, two high-voltage transformers, a voltage multiplier and a specially developed algorithm can reduce problems related to parasitic capacitance that occur in high-voltage high-frequency transformers while maintaining the required performance.
All the tests carried out showed that the designed power supply fulfilled the assumed requirements when all of the parts were properly designed. The device has a sufficiently high current efficiency, enabling the charging of 33 nF capacitance up to the assumed 50 kV voltage in a time much less than the required 330 ms. The output voltage is very stable and the value set using a dedicated computer program corresponds to the measured value.
The selected solution is easier to implement than those typically used for this purpose, increasing failure-free operation, by reducing the current distortion in the primary winding, and increasing the safety of the device (due to performance of the CPLD). The properties of the multi-stage multiplier allow for the easy expansion of the capabilities of the power supply by adding voltage multiplier stages and easily adapting the power supply to different requirements.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. PN-EN 60060-1:2011. High-Voltage Test Techniques—Part 1: General Definitions and Test Requirements. CENELEC: Bruxelles, Belgium, 2011.
  2. Shumail, M.; Krasnykh, A.K.; Liang, T.; Liu, J.C.; Markusen, C.; Rokni, S.H.; Bowden, G.; Jongewaard, E. Design of High Efficiency High Power Electron Accelerator Systems Based on Normal Conducting RF Technology for Energy and Environmental Applications, Design Study Report; U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of High Energy Physics (HEP): Washington, DC, USA, 2018.
  3. Sharma, A.; Nagesh, K.V.; Agarwal, R.; Raul, S.R.; Mittal, K.C.; Rao, G.V.; Mondal, J.; Sethi, R.C. High Power Pulsed Electron Accelerators Development for Industrial Applications. Available online: https://www-pub.iaea.org/mtcd/publications/pdf/p1251-cd/papers/28.pdf (accessed on 4 September 2022).
  4. Saraf, G.; Bansode, A.; Khule, A.; Rangari, S.; Shinde, S.U. High Voltage DC Generation using Marx Generator. Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Commun. Eng. 2017, 6, 611–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, H.; Shu, T.; Li, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Li, W.; Li, D. A compact 4 GW pulse generator based on pulse forming network-Marx for high-power microwave application. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2021, 92, 064707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Verma, R.; Mishra, E.; Shukla, R.; Banerjee, P.; Prabaharan, T.; Sagar, K.; Meena, M.; Shyam, A. Design and development of a portable flash X-ray source driven by battery powered compact Marx generator. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Symposium on Discharges and Electrical Insulation in Vacuum (ISDEIV), Mumbai, India, 28 September–3 October 2014; pp. 605–607. [Google Scholar]
  7. Rainwater, K.; Barnett, D.; Lynn, C.; Dickens, J.; Neuber, A.; Mankowski, J. A 160 J, 100 Hz Rep Rate, Compact Marx generator and HPM source. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Power Modulator and High Voltage Conference (IPMHVC), San Francisco, CA, USA, 6–9 July 2016; pp. 228–230. [Google Scholar]
  8. Achour, Y.; Starzynski, J.; Kasprzycka, W.; Trafny, E. Compact low-cost high-voltage pulse generator for biological applications. Int. J. Circuit Theory Appl. 2019, 47, 1948–1962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Krishnaveni, S.; Rajini, V. Cascaded boost converter-based high-voltage pulse generator for pulsed electric field applications. Arch. Electr. Eng. 2021, 70, 631–641. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhang, H.; Shu, T.; Liu, S.; Zhang, Z.; Song, L.; Zhang, H. A Compact Modular 5 GW Pulse PFN-Marx Generator for Driving HPM Source. Electronics 2021, 10, 545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Achour, Y.; Starzynski, J.; Lasica, A. New Marx Generator Architecture with a Controllable Output Based on IGBTs. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 2017, 45, 3271–3278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ai, Y.; Shi, Y.; Chen, S.; Zhang, Z.; Zhao, S.; Liu, J. High-Voltage Isolated Multiple Output Auxiliary Power Supply with Output Voltage Self-Regulation. Energies 2022, 15, 2106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dhar, R.; Bindu, S.; George, S.; Saroj, P.C.; Sharma, A. Design and simulation of 30 kv solid state DC source. In Proceedings of the 2014 Annual International Conference on Emerging Research Areas: Magnetics, Machines and Drives (AICERA/iCMMD), Kottayam, India, 24–26 July 2014; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kajiuchi, Y.; Noguchi, T. High-voltage power supply for x-ray computed tomography and time-delay compensation of cockcroft-walton circuit. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2019, 1367, 012052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhao, W.; Jiang, Y.; Wu, J.; Huang, Y.; Zhu, Y.; An, J.; Wan, C.-A. Space High-Voltage Power Module. Front. Energy Res. 2021, 9, 642920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hong, F.; Li, L.; Wu, Y.; Ji, B.; Zhou, Y. 1500 V three-level forward converter with phase-shifted control. IET Power Electron. 2018, 11, 1547–1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rwamurangwa, E.; González, J.D.; Villegas Saiz, P.J.; Martín-Ramos, J.A.; Pernía, A.M. A Parallel Resonant Converter Polynomial Model Implemented in a Digital Signal Controller. Electronics 2022, 11, 1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pokryvailo, A.; Carp, C.; Scapellati, C. A 100 kW high voltage power supply for dual energy computer tomography applications. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2015, 22, 1945–1953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rąbkowski, J.; Łasica, Ł.; Zdanowski, M.; Wrona, G.; Starzyński, J. Portable DC Supply Based on SiC Power Devices for High-Voltage Marx Generator. Electronics 2021, 10, 313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Switching Mode Power Supply (SMPS) Topologies. Available online: https://www.smps.us/topologies.html (accessed on 2 August 2022).
  21. Mirzadarani, R.; Mohammadi, H.R.; Ketabi, A.; Motahari, S.R.; Ghorbani, A. Analytical estimation of parasitic capacitances in high-voltage switching transformers. IET Power Electron. 2020, 13, 3830–3839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Himanshu; Singh, H.; Kumar, P.S.; Ali, M.U.; Lee, H.Y.; Khan, M.A.; Park, G.S.; Kim, H.-J. High Frequency Transformer’s Parasitic Capacitance Minimization for Photovoltaic (PV) High-Frequency Link-Based Medium Voltage (MV) Inverter. Electronics 2018, 7, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sanjarinia, M.S.; Saadatmand, S.; Shamsi, P.; Ferdowsi, M. Analysis of Various Transformer Structures for High Frequency Isolation Applications. In Proceedings of the 2019 North American Power Symposium (NAPS), Wichita, KS, USA, 13–15 October 2019; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  24. Chen, D.; Xiao, L.; Yan, W.; Guo, Y. An EMC performance improvement method for three-phase half-bridge converter drive power supply. Energy Rep. 2022, 8, 250–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, C.; Qi, L.; Cui, X.; Shen, Z.; Wei, X. Wideband mechanism model and parameter extracting for high-power high-voltage high-frequency transformers. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2016, 31, 3444–3455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Deng, L.; Wang, P.; Li, X.; Xiao, H.; Peng, T. Investigation on the Parasitic Capacitance of High Frequency and High Voltage Transformers of Multi-Section Windings. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 14065–14073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, N.; Yang, X.; Xie, Y. A Novel Experimental Measurement Method of Transformer Parasitic Capacitances. In Proceedings of the 2019 10th International Conference on Power Electronics and ECCE Asia (ICPE 2019-ECCE Asia), Busan, Korea, 27–30 May 2019. [Google Scholar]
  28. Liu, C.; Qi, L.; Wei, X. Experimental Extraction of Parasitic Capacitances for High-Frequency Transformers. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2017, 32, 4157–4167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bonnin, X.; Piquet, H.; Diez, R.; Florez, D. Designing the high voltage transformer of power supplies for DBD: Windings arrangement to reduce the parasitic capacitive effects. In Proceedings of the 2013 15th European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications (EPE), Lille, France, 2–6 September 2013. [Google Scholar]
  30. Huffman, B. Parasitic Capacitance Effects in Step-Up Transformer Design; Linear Technology Corporation: Milpitas, CA, USA, 1990; Available online: https://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/application-notes/an39f.pdf (accessed on 2 August 2022).
  31. Aristoy, G.; Santos, A.; Slomovitz, D. Testing methods for measuring the effects of stray capacitances on high-voltage current transformers. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2015, 64, 2200–2207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Deng, L.; Sun, Q.; Jiang, F.; Wang, S.; Jiang, S.; Xiao, H.X.; Peng, T. Modeling and Analysis of Parasitic Capacitance Secondary Winding in High-Frequency High-Voltage Transformer Using Finite-Element Method. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 2018, 28, 5500105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Marx generator electric scheme during the charging phase (a) and discharging phase (b).
Figure 1. Marx generator electric scheme during the charging phase (a) and discharging phase (b).
Energies 15 06902 g001
Figure 2. Self-capacitance of a single layer on the spacing between windings.
Figure 2. Self-capacitance of a single layer on the spacing between windings.
Energies 15 06902 g002
Figure 3. Simulation model with high-voltage high-frequency transformer equivalent diagram loaded with Graetza rectifier and capacitor. Lpri—primary winding inductance, Lsec—secondary winding inductance, Cpar—capacitance being the sum of the parasitic capacitances of the secondary winding, CO—load capacitor.
Figure 3. Simulation model with high-voltage high-frequency transformer equivalent diagram loaded with Graetza rectifier and capacitor. Lpri—primary winding inductance, Lsec—secondary winding inductance, Cpar—capacitance being the sum of the parasitic capacitances of the secondary winding, CO—load capacitor.
Energies 15 06902 g003
Figure 4. The value of the peak voltage on the transformer secondary winding (Uout), the current induced in the secondary winding (lsec) and the current flowing through the parasitic capacitance of the secondary winding (Icpar) during charging a 10 nF capacitor.
Figure 4. The value of the peak voltage on the transformer secondary winding (Uout), the current induced in the secondary winding (lsec) and the current flowing through the parasitic capacitance of the secondary winding (Icpar) during charging a 10 nF capacitor.
Energies 15 06902 g004
Figure 5. Peak voltage on the charged output capacitor (a) and instantaneous value primary winding current of the transformer (b) in a model with parasitic capacitance and voltage on the charged output capacitor (c) and instantaneous value current in the primary winding of the transformer (d) in a system with a transformer with parasitic capacitance (simulation results).
Figure 5. Peak voltage on the charged output capacitor (a) and instantaneous value primary winding current of the transformer (b) in a model with parasitic capacitance and voltage on the charged output capacitor (c) and instantaneous value current in the primary winding of the transformer (d) in a system with a transformer with parasitic capacitance (simulation results).
Energies 15 06902 g005
Figure 6. Full-bridge converter schematic.
Figure 6. Full-bridge converter schematic.
Energies 15 06902 g006
Figure 7. Current in the primary winding of the transformer with a high value of parasitic capacitance in the secondary winding of the converter in phase-shifted mode (simulation results).
Figure 7. Current in the primary winding of the transformer with a high value of parasitic capacitance in the secondary winding of the converter in phase-shifted mode (simulation results).
Energies 15 06902 g007
Figure 8. Transistors control signals (M1–M4) in the typical phase-shifted control method.
Figure 8. Transistors control signals (M1–M4) in the typical phase-shifted control method.
Energies 15 06902 g008
Figure 9. Equivalent circuits of full-bridge converter in four states of the developed control method. (a,c)—supply state, (b,d)—freewheeling state.
Figure 9. Equivalent circuits of full-bridge converter in four states of the developed control method. (a,c)—supply state, (b,d)—freewheeling state.
Energies 15 06902 g009
Figure 10. Transistors control signals (M1–M4), current zero-crossing signal (ZC) (a), current flowing through the primary winding (b) in beginning at the charging and transistors control signals (M1–M4), current zero-crossing signal (ZC) (c), current flowing through the primary winding (d) at a later stage of charging.
Figure 10. Transistors control signals (M1–M4), current zero-crossing signal (ZC) (a), current flowing through the primary winding (b) in beginning at the charging and transistors control signals (M1–M4), current zero-crossing signal (ZC) (c), current flowing through the primary winding (d) at a later stage of charging.
Energies 15 06902 g010
Figure 11. Block diagram of high voltage power supply.
Figure 11. Block diagram of high voltage power supply.
Energies 15 06902 g011
Figure 12. Photo of the high voltage power supply finalized prototype interior.
Figure 12. Photo of the high voltage power supply finalized prototype interior.
Energies 15 06902 g012
Figure 13. Block scheme of the measurement setup.
Figure 13. Block scheme of the measurement setup.
Energies 15 06902 g013
Figure 14. Photo of the measurement setup. HV power supply (1), 33 nF MKP capacitor (2), triggered spark gap (3), 50 Ω resistive load (4), HV oscilloscope probe (5).
Figure 14. Photo of the measurement setup. HV power supply (1), 33 nF MKP capacitor (2), triggered spark gap (3), 50 Ω resistive load (4), HV oscilloscope probe (5).
Energies 15 06902 g014
Figure 15. The current in the primary winding circuit (CH1), the signal from the comparator detecting the zero current in the primary circuit (CH2) and the signal controlling one of the transistor on the high side HS (CH3) in a situation where the current fades in a time greater than the minimum switching time of the transistors—measurement performed in the initial charging phase (a) and in a situation where the current fades in a time less than the minimum turn-on time of the transistors—measurement performed in the final phase of charging (b).
Figure 15. The current in the primary winding circuit (CH1), the signal from the comparator detecting the zero current in the primary circuit (CH2) and the signal controlling one of the transistor on the high side HS (CH3) in a situation where the current fades in a time greater than the minimum switching time of the transistors—measurement performed in the initial charging phase (a) and in a situation where the current fades in a time less than the minimum turn-on time of the transistors—measurement performed in the final phase of charging (b).
Energies 15 06902 g015
Figure 16. Charging of the Marx generator to 50 kV.
Figure 16. Charging of the Marx generator to 50 kV.
Energies 15 06902 g016
Figure 17. Capacitors discharging and recharging process when ten pulses with an interval of 330 ms were generated.
Figure 17. Capacitors discharging and recharging process when ten pulses with an interval of 330 ms were generated.
Energies 15 06902 g017
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pachowicz, K. High-Voltage Power Supply for High Repetitive Rate Marx Generator with Quasi-Resonant Zero-Current Switching Transistor Control Algorithm. Energies 2022, 15, 6902. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15196902

AMA Style

Pachowicz K. High-Voltage Power Supply for High Repetitive Rate Marx Generator with Quasi-Resonant Zero-Current Switching Transistor Control Algorithm. Energies. 2022; 15(19):6902. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15196902

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pachowicz, Krzysztof. 2022. "High-Voltage Power Supply for High Repetitive Rate Marx Generator with Quasi-Resonant Zero-Current Switching Transistor Control Algorithm" Energies 15, no. 19: 6902. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15196902

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop