Next Article in Journal
Modeling Control and Robustness Assessment of Multilevel Flying-Capacitor Converters
Next Article in Special Issue
Achieving High-Performance Spherical Natural Graphite Anode through a Modified Carbon Coating for Lithium-Ion Batteries
Previous Article in Journal
Small-Scale Biodiesel Production Plants—An Overview
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Active Cascaded Battery Voltage Balancing Circuit Based on Multi-Winding Transformer with Small Magnetizing Inductance
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Energies
Volume 14
Issue 7
10.3390/en14071902
energies-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Application of a Polyacrylate Latex to a Lithium Iron Phosphate Cathode as a Binder Material

by
Mi Tian
†,
Yanchunxiao Qi
† and
Eun-Suok Oh
*
School of Chemical Engineering, University of Ulsan, 93 Daehak-ro, Nam-gu, Ulsan 44610, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Equally contributed to this work.
Energies 2021, 14(7), 1902; https://doi.org/10.3390/en14071902
Submission received: 25 February 2021 / Revised: 22 March 2021 / Accepted: 24 March 2021 / Published: 30 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Materials and Technologies for Lithium-Ion Battery)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In the manufacturing process of lithium-ion batteries, the current organic solvent-based processes will inevitably be replaced with eco-friendly water-based processes. For this purpose, the current organic-soluble binder should be replaced with a water-soluble or water-dispersed binder. In this study, a new polyacrylate latex dispersed in water was successfully applied as a binder of lithium-ion battery cathodes for the first time. One of the biggest advantages of the polyacrylate binder is that it is electrochemically stable at the working voltage of typical cathodes, unlike a conventional water-dispersed styrene-butadiene binder. This implies that the water-dispersed polyacrylate has no limitations for the usage of a cathodic binder. The performance of the polyacrylate binder for lithium iron phosphate cathodes was compared with those of a conventional organic-based polyvinylidene fluoride binder as well as a water-dispersed styrene-butadiene binder. The polyacrylate binder exhibited an electrochemical performance that was comparable to that of an existing styrene-butadiene binder and much better than that of the polyvinylidene fluoride binder. This superior performance of the polyacrylate binder is attributed to the point-to-point bonding mechanism of an emulsified binder, which leads to a strong adhesion strength as well as the low electrical and charge transfer resistances of the cathodes.

1. Introduction

In recent years, lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) have been used in an extended range of applications, from small portable devices to electric vehicles and energy storage systems [1,2,3,4]. There are several imperative issues for LIBs: prolonged cycle stability, high energy and rate capability, low cost, safety, and an environmentally friendly manufacturing process. To cope with these issues, all components of LIB electrodes should be optimized according to the particular application. The electrodes are normally composed of active materials as a major component, as well as a conducting agent and a polymeric binder as minor inactive components [5]. Lithium transition metal oxides containing cobalt, nickel, or manganese have been widely studied over the last few decades [6,7,8,9,10,11]. However, cobalt and nickel are less common, carcinogenic, mutagenic, and reprotoxic metals, which should be avoided as much as possible in future LIB manufacturing [12,13]. Hence, LiFePO4 (LFP), which contains abundant and environmentally friendly iron, has attracted the attention of many researchers and industries [14,15,16,17,18,19]. LFP is also known for its high thermal stability, with appreciable capacity (170 mAh g−1), and its good long-term cycle stability [20].
Beyond the active materials, a polymeric binder is also an indispensable element in LIBs that plays a important role in maintaining the electrical network integrity of the electrode, though it is inactive in electrochemical reactions [21,22,23,24]. As a conventional binder for the cathode, polyvinylidene fluoride (PVdF) has typically been used due to its excellent chemical stability [25,26,27]. However, PVdF should be used in the form of a solution with a toxic organic solvent, N-methyl pyrrolidone (NMP), during the preparation of the electrode slurry [28,29,30]. This certainly causes difficulties in electrode manufacturing and increases manufacturing costs [31]. Therefore, there have been intensive studies on water-based binders, including styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR), carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC), sodium alginate, polyacrylic acid, polyvinylpyrrolidone, etc. [32,33,34,35,36]. Of these, SBR is the most common water-based binder because of its good flexibility, strong binding force, and high heat resistance [37,38]. In particular, SBR combined with CMC is widely applied in commercial graphite anodes [38,39,40]. However, SBR is oxidized when a voltage exceeding 4.2 V is applied to LiCoO2 cathodes, because unsaturated C=C double bonds in the butadiene chains of SBR are unstable at such a high voltage [41]. This is one of the reasons to limit the implementation of a water-based SBR binder on LIB cathodes.
A polymeric binder as an inactive component should be stable in anodic and cathodic environments. This is an essential factor in constructing a potential water-based binder that has good electrochemical stability in a wide voltage window when applied to a LIB cathode. In this study, a new water-based polyacrylate latex (PAL) binder will be applied to commercial LFP cathodes for the first time, although polyacrylates such as neutralized polyacrylic acid were used as binders for graphite and silicon graphite anodes [42,43]. Moreover, this binder be compared to typical SBR and PVdF binders in terms of electrochemical stability. In addition, comprehensive electrochemical tests of the LFP cathodes produced by the new binder or the two typical binders will be performed and discussed in detail.

2. Materials and Methods

The water-based electrode slurry was composed of 90 wt% of active material LFP (Advanced Lithium Electrochemistry Co. Ltd, Taoyuan City, Taiwan), 5 wt% of super-p (SP, Alfa Aesar, Tewksbury, MA, USA), 2 wt% of thickener CMC (Daicel Fine Chem Ltd., Osaka, Japan), and 3 wt% of water-based binders PAL or SBR (Zeon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). PAL (Eco chemical Co. Ltd., Ulsan, Korea) is a type of polyacrylate manufactured from emulsion polymerization; due to the policy of the company, the detailed components of the PAL are not available. The organic-based electrode slurry was composed of LFP, SP, and PVdF (90:5:5 wt.%), and NMP was used as solvent. The slurry was mixed in a planetary ball mill and casted on aluminum foil. The water-based and organic-based electrodes were dried in a convection oven at 60 °C and 120 °C for 30 min, respectively. Next, the electrodes were dried again in a vacuum oven at 70 °C overnight. The mass loading of electrodes was 11.9 ± 0.4 mg cm−2. Using the working electrodes, CR2032 coin-half cells were assembled with polypropylene separator film, a lithium chip as a counter electrode, and 1 M LiPF6 in 1:1:1 ethylene carbonate:dimethyl carbonate:ethyl methyl carbonate by volume (Panaxetec Co., Busan, Korea) as electrolyte.
Meanwhile, the electrodes composed of the binder and SP alone were also manufactured to investigate the electrochemical stability of the binder at high voltage. The weight ratios of PAL/CMC:SP, SBR/CMC:SP, and PVdF:SP were 1/1:10, 1/1:10, and 3:7, respectively. These electrodes were also assembled to HS-3E flat (Hohsen Corp., Osaka, Japan) cells with the same counter, separator, and electrolyte as above.
Using the same ways described in our previous study [44], various characteristics of of the binder and electrode were examined: the particle sizes of SBR and PAL latex, the adhesion strength of the electrode, and the electrode resistances. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) testing to assess the electrochemical stability of the electrode was performed in the voltage range from 2.0 to 4.5 V, with 10 mV s−1 for HS-3E flat cells and 0.25 mV s−1 for CR2032 cells using a potentiostat. The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) test was performed in the frequency range from 106 Hz to 10−2 Hz at the direct current potential of E = 3.5 V. Long-term cycling and rate capability tests were conducted between 2.5 V and 4.0 V with a CC/CV charge mood and a CC discharge mood. For long-term cycling tests, the cells were charged/discharged at 0.1 C for the first 3 cycles and at 1 C for the next 100 cycles. The cells were charged/discharged with a variety of currents, ranging from 0.1 C to 10 C.

3. Results and Discussion

First, the electrochemical stability of the binder was investigated through the CV of HS-3E flat cells, and the result is shown in Figure 1. During the 3 cycles within 2.0~4.5 V, the oxidation peaks appear at voltages approximately above 4.2 V only in the SBR electrode, although the peak intensity decreases as the cycle proceeds. However, there is no corresponding reduction peak in the cathodic scan to 2.0 V, indicating that the oxidation of SBR is irreversible. These findings are consistent with those of the previous study. Yabuuchi et al. [41] reported that the unsaturated C=C of butadiene chains in SBR was oxidized at voltages above 4.2 V. By contrast, no distinguishable oxidation peaks exist in the CV curves of the PAL and PVdF electrodes, other than typical electrochemical double layer characteristics [44]. Therefore, there is no doubt that PAL is as electrochemically stable as PVdF within the cathodic working voltage. The slight current increases in the PAL and PVdF electrodes during the anodic scan near 4.5 V are attributable to the electrochemical decomposition of electrolytes. From this simple CV result, the new water-based PAL can be applied as a cathodic binder, at least over LFP electrodes, unlike the SBR binder.
In addition to the environmentally friendly characteristic of water-based latex binders, another outstanding benefit of the latex binders is the use of less binder than in a typical organic-soluble PVdF binder. Because the binder is an electrochemically inactive component of electrodes, its content should be minimized as much as possible. Unlike the PVdF binder of the surface contact mechanism, water-based emulsified binders such as SBR or PAL enter into contact with the active material through the point-to-point binding mechanism, with its fine polymer particles [45]. The fine particles of the water-based emulsified binder can help maintain the electrode integrity with a smaller amount than PVdF, ultimately leading to an increase in capacity, although it remains ambiguous how small particles should optimally be for LIB electrodes. As shown in Figure 2, the average size of PAL particles is around 182 nm, whereas that of SBR particles is approximately 104 nm. The particle size can be easily controlled by modifying the emulsion polymerization techniques and components, such as the temperature and reaction time of the polymerization, the amount of surfactant, initiator, pH stabilizer, etc.; this is out of the scope of this study.
The most important properties of electrodes in terms of binder are their adhesion and electrical resistance. Electrode adhesion was first examined via a mechanical peel test of the electrode, and the result is shown in Figure 3a. No meaningful peel strength was observed for the LFP electrode containing a PVdF binder. Meanwhile, the LFP electrodes containing emulsified PAL and SBR binders showed approximate peel strengths of 15.8 N cm−1 and 25.1 N cm−1, respectively. However, as displayed in Figure 3a, the peel strength of the LFP/SBR electrode was not as stable as that of the LFP/PAL electrode during the test. This implies that the PAL binder disperses in the electrode better than the SBR binder. This is also confirmed by the pictures in Figure 3b that show the dispersion of SP in the binder latices. Due to the hydrophobic nature of carbonaceous SP, SP is hardly dispersed in water. Compared to the dispersion of SP in SBR latex, SP is relatively well dispersed in the PAL latex. This must be attributed to the functional groups in acrylate, such as carboxylate, which can easily interact with the functional groups on SP as impurities. The uniform dispersion of the binder can avoid the aggregation of the active material and SP, which is advantageous for the electrochemical performance of electrodes.
The electrode resistances are measured using 46 multipoint probes connected to a measurement system. The system allows for the electrical resistances of an electrode to be measured without requiring the geometric correction factors caused by typical four-point probe systems. As listed in Table 1, the LFP/PAL electrode has the smallest surface and volume resistivities of the three LFP electrodes, and it also has a slightly higher interface resistance than the LFP/SRB electrode. In particular, compared to a commercial PVdF binder, the PAL binder decreases the volume resistivity of the LFP electrode from 12.2 to 7.27 Ω cm, which corresponds to a decrease of 40.4%. Though the relatively lower adhesion of the LFP/PAL leads to a slightly larger resistance assigned to the interface between the electrode and the current collector than that of the LFP/SBR electrode, the PAL binder is clearly favorable for producing an LFP electrode possessing lower electrical resistance due to its good dispersion in the electrode.
The electrochemical characteristics of the LFP electrodes were examined using CV and EIS experiments, and the results are depicted in Figure 4. The LFP electrodes containing a PAL or SBR binder show clear and strong oxidation peaks at 3.5 V and symmetrical reduction peaks at 3.3 V; these are respectively assigned to the redox reaction of Fe2+/Fe3+ in LFP. In both binders, the potential gaps of the peaks are almost the same, at nearly 200 mV. By contrast, the redox peaks of the LFP/PVdF electrode are relatively sluggish, and their potential gap is approximately 800 mV, which is much larger than those of the LFP/PAL and LFP/SBR electrodes. This implies that the polarization resistance of the LFP electrode is decreased when a water-based PAL or SBR binder is used instead of a commercial PVdF binder. This may be why the point-to-point contact of PAL and SBR provides more free paths for the movement of Li+ in the LFP electrode. Further evidence for this point comes from the EIS analysis of the electrodes after four times of cycling. The results are shown in Figure 4b. The size of the semicircle represents the charge transfer resistance for electrochemical reactions occurring at the interface between the electrode and the electrolyte [46]. Meanwhile, the straight line at the low frequency provides information on the Warburg resistance related to the ion diffusion in the electrode [45]. It is obvious from the figure that the charge transfer resistances of the LFP composed of PAL (18.4 Ω) and SBR (21.5 Ω) latex binders are much smaller than that of the PVdF binder (457.5 Ω). In addition, the PAL electrode has a steeper slope than the SBR electrode at low frequency, demonstrating a faster ion diffusion. Overall, the reduced charge transfer resistance and improved ion diffusion achieved with the use of the PAL binder may benefit the electrochemical performance of the LFP electrode.
Finally, Figure 5 shows the electrochemical performance of the LFP electrodes with respect to the long-term cycle and rate-capability. The electrodes containing a PAL or SBR binder show excellent long-term cycling stability with the discharge capacities of 142 mAh g−1 for LFP/PAL and 136 mAh g−1 for LFP/SBR after 100 cycles. By contrast, the LFP/PVdF electrode suffers from severe capacity fading, such that the capacity retention is only 7.1% at the 100th cycle. In addition, the PVdF electrode shows serious unstable coulombic efficiency, whereas the others have superior stable coulombic efficiencies, above 96%. This is consistent with the results of high-rate tests showing that the cells are charged and discharged at various current densities: 0.1 C, 0.2 C, 0.5 C, 1.0 C, 2.0 C, 5.0 C, and 10.0 C. At each current, eight cycles are repeated, and then the current returns to 0.1 C to check the electrode recovery. As shown in Figure 5b, the PVdF electrode shows low capacities even at low currents of 0.1 C and 0.2 C, as well as nearly zero capacity above 0.5 C. This might be caused by the network bonding mechanism of the PVdF binder, i.e., the weak adhesion strength, high electrical resistances, and significant charge transfer resistance caused by the PVdF binder. By contrast, the PAL and SBR electrodes show a good rate performance with a capacity retention relatively higher than 50%, even at 10 C. In addition, the electrodes fully restore their capacities when 0.1 C is given to the electrodes from 10 C, implying that they do not suffer any physical damage with such high current charge/discharge cycles. Further, it is clear from Figure 5c,d, showing the charge-discharge profiles at different current densities, that the LFP/PAL electrode has more stable voltage profiles than the LFP/SBR electrode.
In summary, the PAL binder is a promising water-based binder candidate for an LFP cathode, due to its excellent electrochemical stability at high voltages, pleasant dispersion in slurry, satisfactory adhesive strength, and small surface and volume resistances.

4. Conclusions

Similarly to the commercial SBR binder for LIB anodes, the new PAL binder makes the manufacturing process of LIB cathodes eco-friendly, because it is dispersed in water as an emulsion state. However, unlike the SBR binder, the PAL binder is electrochemically stable at such a high working voltage of LIB cathode, due to the lack of a carbon-carbon double bond in the main chain of PAL. The CV result confirms that the PAL has a good electrochemical stability, up to 4.5 V, just like organic-based PVdF binder. In addition, when compared to the PVdF binder used for normal cathodes, there are several advantages originating from the point-to-point bonding mechanism of the PAL binder. The LFP cathode manufactured by the PAL binder has a stronger adhesion strength, lower electrical resistances, and better charge transfer characteristics than that manufactured by the PVdF binder. Consequently, the LFP cathode containing the PAL binder could achieve an excellent specific discharge capacity of 155 mAh g−1 with a high capacity retention of 91.5% after 100 cycles at 1.0 C. Even the specific discharge capacity remains at more than 50% when the charge/discharge current density increases up to 10 C. These are much better than the corresponding values for the LFP cathode composed of the conventional PVdF binder.

Author Contributions

Methodology, M.T.; investigation, M.T.; formal analysis, M.T. and Y.Q.; writing—original draft preparation, M.T. and Y.Q.; supervision, Y.Q. and E.-S.O.; validation, E.-S.O.; project administration, E.-S.O.; writing-review and editing, E.-S.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by a National Research Foundation of Korea grant funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT(MSIT) [NRF-2019R1A2C1004593] and by the Industrial Strategic Technology Development Program funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE, Korea) [20009866].

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. He, J.; Zhong, H.; Wang, J.; Zhang, L. Investigation on Xanthan Gum as Novel Water Soluble Binder for LiFePO4 Cathode in Lithium-Ion Batteries. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 714, 409–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Barré, A.; Deguilhem, B.; Grolleau, S.; Gérard, M.; Suard, F.; Riu, D. A Review on Lithium-Ion Battery Ageing Mechanisms and Estimations for Automotive Applications. J. Power Sources 2013, 241, 680–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Zubi, G.; Dufo-López, R.; Carvalho, M.; Pasaoglu, G. The Lithium-Ion Battery: State of the Art and Future Perspectives. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 89, 292–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yang, Y.; Okonkwo, E.G.; Huang, G.; Xu, S.; Sun, W.; He, Y. On the Sustainability of Lithium Ion Battery Industry—A Review and Perspective. Energy Storage Mater. 2020. [CrossRef]
  5. Kraytsberg, A.; Ein-Eli, Y. Conveying Advanced Li-Ion Battery Materials into Practice The Impact of Electrode Slurry Preparation Skills. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1600655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, K.; Wan, J.; Xiang, Y.; Zhu, J.; Leng, Q.; Wang, M.; Xu, L.; Yang, Y. Recent Advances and Historical Developments of High Voltage Lithium Cobalt Oxide Materials for Rechargeable Li-Ion Batteries. J. Power Sources 2020, 460, 228062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wan, J.; Zhu, J.; Xiang, Y.; Zhong, G.; Liu, X.; Li, Y.; Zhang, K.H.L.; Hong, C.; Zheng, J.; Wang, K.; et al. Revealing the Correlation between Structure Evolution and Electrochemical Performance of High-Voltage Lithium Cobalt Oxide. J. Energy Chem. 2021, 54, 786–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Matsuda, T.; Ando, K.; Myojin, M.; Matsumoto, M.; Sanada, T.; Takao, N.; Imai, H.; Imamura, D. Investigation of the Influence of Temperature on the Degradation Mechanism of Commercial Nickel Manganese Cobalt Oxide-Type Lithium-Ion Cells during Long-Term Cycle Tests. J. Energy Storage 2019, 21, 665–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Schmitt, J.; Maheshwari, A.; Heck, M.; Lux, S.; Vetter, M. Impedance Change and Capacity Fade of Lithium Nickel Manganese Cobalt Oxide-Based Batteries during Calendar Aging. J. Power Sources 2017, 353, 183–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kim, H.; Lee, K.; Kim, S.; Kim, Y. Fluorination of Free Lithium Residues on the Surface of Lithium Nickel Cobalt Aluminum Oxide Cathode Materials for Lithium Ion Batteries. Mater. Des. 2016, 100, 175–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wong, D.; Shrestha, B.; Wetz, D.A.; Heinzel, J.M. Impact of High Rate Discharge on the Aging of Lithium Nickel Cobalt Aluminum Oxide Batteries. J. Power Sources 2015, 280, 363–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chagnes, A.; Pospiech, B. A Brief Review on Hydrometallurgical Technologies for Recycling Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2013, 88, 1191–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Manthiram, A. A Reflection on Lithium-Ion Battery Cathode Chemistry. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Shin, H.C.; Cho, W.I.; Jang, H. Electrochemical Properties of the Carbon-Coated LiFePO4 as a Cathode Material for Lithium-Ion Secondary Batteries. J. Power Sources 2006, 159, 1383–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wu, Y.; Wen, Z.; Feng, H.; Li, J. Sucrose-Assisted Loading of LiFePO4 Nanoparticles on Graphene for High-Performance Lithium-Ion Battery Cathodes. Chem. Eur. J. 2013, 19, 5631–5636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chen, X.; Li, Y.; Wang, J. Enhanced Electrochemical Performance of LiFePO4 Originating from the Synergistic Effect of ZnO and C Co-Modification. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Jing, Q.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, W.; Chen, Y.; Wang, C. Direct Regeneration of Spent LiFePO4 Cathode Material by a Green and Efficient One-Step Hydrothermal Method. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 17622–17628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chand, P.; Kumar, S.; Singh, V.; Singh, N.P. Investigation of the Structural and Electrical Behavior of LiFePO4 as Cathode Material for Energy Storage Application. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 32, 483–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. de la Torre-Gamarra, C.; Sotomayor, M.E.; Sanchez, J.-Y.; Levenfeld, B.; Várez, A.; Laïk, B.; Pereira-Ramos, J.-P. High Mass Loading Additive-Free LiFePO4 Cathodes with 500 Μm Thickness for High Areal Capacity Li-Ion Batteries. J. Power Sources 2020, 458, 228033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Khalifa, H.; El-Safty, S.A.; Reda, A.; Elmarakbi, A.; Metawa, H.; Shenashen, M.A. Multifaceted Geometric 3D Mesopolytope Cathodes and Its Directional Transport Gates for Superscalable LIB Models. Appl. Mater. Today 2020, 19, 100590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nam, Y.J.; Cho, S.-J.; Oh, D.Y.; Lim, J.-M.; Kim, S.Y.; Song, J.H.; Lee, Y.-G.; Lee, S.-Y.; Jung, Y.S. Bendable and Thin Sulfide Solid Electrolyte Film: A New Electrolyte Opportunity for Free-Standing and Stackable High-Energy All-Solid-State Lithium-Ion Batteries. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 3317–3323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hu, B.; Shkrob, I.A.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, J.; Li, Y.; Liao, C.; Zhang, Z.; Lu, W.; Zhang, L. The Existence of Optimal Molecular Weight for Poly(Acrylic Acid) Binders in Silicon/Graphite Composite Anode for Lithium-Ion Batteries. J. Power Sources 2018, 378, 671–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Qi, Y.; Nguyen, M.H.T.; Oh, E.-S. Enhancement of the Lithium Titanium Oxide Anode Performance by the Copolymerization of Conductive Polypyrrole with Poly(Acrylonitrile/Butyl Acrylate) Binder. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2020, 50, 431–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ren, W.-F.; Le, J.-B.; Li, J.-T.; Hu, Y.-Y.; Pan, S.-Y.; Deng, L.; Zhou, Y.; Huang, L.; Sun, S.-G. Improving the Electrochemical Property of Silicon Anodes through Hydrogen-Bonding Cross-Linked Thiourea-Based Polymeric Binders. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020. [CrossRef]
  25. Markevich, E.; Salitra, G.; Aurbach, D. Influence of the PVdF Binder on the Stability of LiCoO2 Electrodes. Electrochem. Commun. 2005, 7, 1298–1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Han, B.; Piernas-Muñoz, M.J.; Dogan, F.; Kubal, J.; Trask, S.E.; Bloom, I.D.; Vaughey, J.T.; Key, B. Probing the Reaction between PVDF and LiPAA vs Li7Si3: Investigation of Binder Stability for Si Anodes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2019, 166, A2396–A2402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, M.; Xu, Z.; Hou, Y.; Li, P.; Sun, H.; Niu, Q.J. Fabrication of a Superhydrophilic PVDF Membrane with Excellent Chemical and Mechanical Stability for Highly Efficient Emulsion Separation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020, 251, 117408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wood, D.L.; Quass, J.D.; Li, J.; Ahmed, S.; Ventola, D.; Daniel, C. Technical and Economic Analysis of Solvent-Based Lithium-Ion Electrode Drying with Water and NMP. Dry. Technol. 2018, 36, 234–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lee, S.; Kim, E.-Y.; Lee, H.; Oh, E.-S. Effects of Polymeric Binders on Electrochemical Performances of Spinel Lithium Manganese Oxide Cathodes in Lithium Ion Batteries. J. Power Sources 2014, 269, 418–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Prosini, P.P.; Carewska, M.; Cento, C.; Masci, A. Poly Vinyl Acetate Used as a Binder for the Fabrication of a LiFePO4-Based Composite Cathode for Lithium-Ion Batteries. Electrochimica Acta 2014, 150, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Soeda, K.; Yamagata, M.; Ishikawa, M. Alginic Acid as a New Aqueous Slurry-Based Binder for Cathode Materials of LIB. ECS Trans. 2015, 64, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Isozumi, H.; Horiba, T.; Kubota, K.; Hida, K.; Matsuyama, T.; Yasuno, S.; Komaba, S. Application of Modified Styrene-Butadiene-Rubber-Based Latex Binder to High-Voltage Operating LiCoO2 Composite Electrodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries. J. Power Sources 2020, 468, 228332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Qiu, L.; Shao, Z.; Wang, D.; Wang, W.; Wang, F.; Wang, J. Enhanced Electrochemical Properties of LiFePO4 (LFP) Cathode Using the Carboxymethyl Cellulose Lithium (CMC-Li) as Novel Binder in Lithium-Ion Battery. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 111, 588–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bigoni, F.; De Giorgio, F.; Soavi, F.; Arbizzani, C. Sodium Alginate: A Water-Processable Binder in High-Voltage Cathode Formulations. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2017, 164, A6171–A6177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chong, J.; Xun, S.; Zheng, H.; Song, X.; Liu, G.; Ridgway, P.; Wang, J.Q.; Battaglia, V.S. A Comparative Study of Polyacrylic Acid and Poly(Vinylidene Difluoride) Binders for Spherical Natural Graphite/LiFePO4 Electrodes and Cells. J. Power Sources 2011, 196, 7707–7714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Aslan, M.; Weingarth, D.; Jäckel, N.; Atchison, J.S.; Grobelsek, I.; Presser, V. Polyvinylpyrrolidone as Binder for Castable Supercapacitor Electrodes with High Electrochemical Performance in Organic Electrolytes. J. Power Sources 2014, 266, 374–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Buqa, H.; Holzapfel, M.; Krumeich, F.; Veit, C.; Novák, P. Study of Styrene Butadiene Rubber and Sodium Methyl Cellulose as Binder for Negative Electrodes in Lithium-Ion Batteries. J. Power Sources 2006, 161, 617–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhang, R.; Yang, X.; Zhang, D.; Qiu, H.; Fu, Q.; Na, H.; Guo, Z.; Du, F.; Chen, G.; Wei, Y. Water Soluble Styrene Butadiene Rubber and Sodium Carboxyl Methyl Cellulose Binder for ZnFe2O4 Anode Electrodes in Lithium Ion Batteries. J. Power Sources 2015, 285, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gordon, R.; Orias, R.; Willenbacher, N. Effect of Carboxymethyl Cellulose on the Flow Behavior of Lithium-Ion Battery Anode Slurries and the Electrical as Well as Mechanical Properties of Corresponding Dry Layers. J. Mater. Sci. 2020, 55, 15867–15881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Versaci, D.; Nasi, R.; Zubair, U.; Amici, J.; Sgroi, M.; Dumitrescu, M.A.; Francia, C.; Bodoardo, S.; Penazzi, N. New Eco-Friendly Low-Cost Binders for Li-Ion Anodes. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2017, 21, 3429–3435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yabuuchi, N.; Kinoshita, Y.; Misaki, K.; Matsuyama, T.; Komaba, S. Electrochemical Properties of LiCoO 2 Electrodes with Latex Binders on High-Voltage Exposure. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2015, 162, A538–A544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Komaba, S.; Okushi, K.; Ozeki, T.; Yui, H.; Katayama, Y.; Miura, T.; Saito, T.; Groult, H. Polyacrylate Modifier for Graphite Anode of Lithium-Ion Batteries. Electrochem. Solid State Lett. 2009, 12, A107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Han, Z.-J.; Yabuuchi, N.; Shimomura, K.; Murase, M.; Yui, H.; Komaba, S. High-Capacity Si–Graphite Composite Electrodes with a Self-Formed Porous Structure by a Partially Neutralized Polyacrylate for Li-Ion Batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 9014–9020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Qi, Y.; Nguyen, M.H.T.; Oh, E.-S. Effect of Conductive Polypyrrole in Poly(Acrylonitrile-Co-Butyl Acrylate) Water–Based Binder on the Performance of Electrochemical Double-Layer Capacitors. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2020. [CrossRef]
  45. Nguyen, M.H.T.; Oh, E.-S. Application of a New Acrylonitrile/Butylacrylate Water-Based Binder for Negative Electrodes of Lithium-Ion Batteries. Electrochem. Commun. 2013, 35, 45–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhang, S.S.; Xu, K.; Jow, T.R. Electrochemical Impedance Study on the Low Temperature of Li-Ion Batteries. Electrochimica Acta 2004, 49, 1057–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Energies 14 01902 g001 550
Figure 1. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) of the binder electrodes. The binder electrodes are composed of styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR), polyacrylate latex (PAL), or polyvinylidene fluoride (PVdF) with excess amounts of super-p (SP) conducting agent.
Figure 1. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) of the binder electrodes. The binder electrodes are composed of styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR), polyacrylate latex (PAL), or polyvinylidene fluoride (PVdF) with excess amounts of super-p (SP) conducting agent.
Energies 14 01902 g001
Energies 14 01902 g002 550
Figure 2. Particle size distribution of PAL and SBR latices.
Figure 2. Particle size distribution of PAL and SBR latices.
Energies 14 01902 g002
Energies 14 01902 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) 180° peel strength of LiFePO4 (LFP) electrodes containing PAL, SBR, or PVdF binder. (b) Dispersion of SP in PAL and SBR latices.
Figure 3. (a) 180° peel strength of LiFePO4 (LFP) electrodes containing PAL, SBR, or PVdF binder. (b) Dispersion of SP in PAL and SBR latices.
Energies 14 01902 g003
Energies 14 01902 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) CV and (b) impedance spectroscopy (EIS) of the LFP electrodes containing different binders.
Figure 4. (a) CV and (b) impedance spectroscopy (EIS) of the LFP electrodes containing different binders.
Energies 14 01902 g004
Energies 14 01902 g005 550
Figure 5. Electrochemical performance of the electrodes containing different binders: (a) long-term cycling, (b) rate capability. (c,d) are the voltage-capacity profiles of the electrodes at various currents.
Figure 5. Electrochemical performance of the electrodes containing different binders: (a) long-term cycling, (b) rate capability. (c,d) are the voltage-capacity profiles of the electrodes at various currents.
Energies 14 01902 g005
Table
Table 1. Surface and volume resistivities and interface resistance of the LFP electrodes.
Table 1. Surface and volume resistivities and interface resistance of the LFP electrodes.
ElectrodeComposite Thickness
(μm)		Composite Surface Resistivity
(Ohm cm2)		Interface Resistance
(Ohm cm2)		Composite Volume Resistivity
(Ohm cm)
PAL16.41.19 × 10−22.937.27
SBR16.91.85 × 10−21.857.59
PVdF18.52.75 × 10−28.9112.20
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tian, M.; Qi, Y.; Oh, E.-S. Application of a Polyacrylate Latex to a Lithium Iron Phosphate Cathode as a Binder Material. Energies 2021, 14, 1902. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14071902

AMA Style

Tian M, Qi Y, Oh E-S. Application of a Polyacrylate Latex to a Lithium Iron Phosphate Cathode as a Binder Material. Energies. 2021; 14(7):1902. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14071902

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tian, Mi, Yanchunxiao Qi, and Eun-Suok Oh. 2021. "Application of a Polyacrylate Latex to a Lithium Iron Phosphate Cathode as a Binder Material" Energies 14, no. 7: 1902. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14071902

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop