Next Article in Journal
Assessment of Methods for the Real-Time Simulation of Electronic and Thermal Circuits
Next Article in Special Issue
The Impacts of a Building’s Thermal Mass on the Cooling Load of a Radiant System under Various Typical Climates
Previous Article in Journal
Effective Permeability of Multi Air Gap Ferrite Core 3-Phase Medium Frequency Transformer in Isolated DC-DC Converters
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Discussion on the Effective Ventilation Distance in Dead-End Tunnels
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Life Cycle Environmental Costs of Buildings

1
School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
2
College of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
3
China Academy of Building Research, Beijing 100013, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2020, 13(6), 1353; https://doi.org/10.3390/en13061353
Submission received: 21 February 2020 / Revised: 9 March 2020 / Accepted: 12 March 2020 / Published: 14 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Life Cycle & Technoeconomic Modeling)

Abstract

Energy consumption and pollutant emissions from buildings have caused serious impacts on the environment. Currently, research on building environmental costs is quite insufficient. Based on life cycle inventory of building materials, fossil fuel and electricity power, a calculating model for environmental costs during different stages is presented. A single-objective optimization model is generated by converting environmental impact into environmental cost, with the same unit with direct cost. Two residential buildings, one located in Beijing and another in Xiamen, China, are taken as the case studies and analyzed to test the proposed model. Moreover, data uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of key parameters, including the discount rate and the unit virtual abatement costs of pollutants, are also conducted. The analysis results show that the environmental cost accounts for about 16% of direct cost. The environmental degradation cost accounts for about 70% of the total environmental cost. According to the probabilistic uncertainty analysis results, the coefficient of variation of material production stage is the largest. The sensitivity analysis results indicate that the unit virtual abatement cost of CO2 has the largest influence on the final environmental cost.
Keywords: building; environmental costs; green GDP, China; uncertainty analysis; sensitivity analysis building; environmental costs; green GDP, China; uncertainty analysis; sensitivity analysis
Graphical Abstract

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Y.; Pang, B.; Zhang, X.; Wang, J.; Liu, Y.; Shi, C.; Zhou, S. Life Cycle Environmental Costs of Buildings. Energies 2020, 13, 1353. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13061353

AMA Style

Wang Y, Pang B, Zhang X, Wang J, Liu Y, Shi C, Zhou S. Life Cycle Environmental Costs of Buildings. Energies. 2020; 13(6):1353. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13061353

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Yuanfeng, Bo Pang, Xiangjie Zhang, Jingjing Wang, Yinshan Liu, Chengcheng Shi, and Shuowen Zhou. 2020. "Life Cycle Environmental Costs of Buildings" Energies 13, no. 6: 1353. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13061353

APA Style

Wang, Y., Pang, B., Zhang, X., Wang, J., Liu, Y., Shi, C., & Zhou, S. (2020). Life Cycle Environmental Costs of Buildings. Energies, 13(6), 1353. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13061353

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop