Analysis of Risk Factors Associated with Pre-Myopia Among Primary School Students in the Mianyang Science City
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Methods
2.1. General Information
2.2. Quality Control
2.3. Method for Measuring Diopter (Chinese Doctor Association, 2019).
2.4. Evaluation Criteria
2.5. Data Entry and Data Processing
3. Results
3.1. Comparison of the Prevalence Rate of Pre-Myopia by Sex and Age
3.2. Analysis of Risk Factors Associated with Pre-Myopia
3.3. Multiple Logistic Regression Analysis of Risk Factors Associated with Pre-Myopia
4. Discussion
- (1)
- Genetic factors. Studies have shown that myopia is hereditary, either monogenic or polygenic. Children of nearsighted parents are significantly more likely to develop myopia (Guggenheim, J. A.et al. 2000), and children of nearsighted siblings are also more likely to develop myopia (Yang, Z.et al.2009). The results of our study show that children of parents with myopia are at a significantly increased risk of developing pre-myopia, suggesting that pre-myopia might be genetically related and is at high risk of developing myopia if left untreated during this period.
- (2)
- Outdoor time: a Meta-analysis on myopia (Zhang, M., et al 2022) showed that outdoor activity can effectively improve students’ dynamic visual acuity and uncorrected visual acuity (UCCA), and the time they spend outside was obviously negatively correlated with the prevalence of myopia: the longer the outdoor activity time the lower the prevalence of myopia (Xu, Q., et al2015)., and extending outdoor activity time also slowed down the development of myopia (Lao, Y. Q. et al. 2019). Multivariate statistical analysis showed that a daily outdoor activity time shorter than 2 h was a risk factor for the development of pre-myopia, which might be associated with the fact that UV light during outdoor activity inhibits the extension of axial length while increasing the release of retinal dopamine and decreasing the axial elongation of the eye (Zhou, X. et al.2017). Therefore, primary school students are recommended to increase their daily outdoor time.
- (3)
- Continuous use of eyes: Near vision work leads to retinal defocus, and to make the retinal imaging clear, the eye muscles automatically move the focus back behind the retina, making the choroid thinner. Excessive and continuous use of the eyes will cause the extension of axial length and following early pre-myopia. If such behavior is not intervened, it can lead to the focus of the posterior segment of the eye to move back, then present myopia (Wang, F., et al.2019). The results of this study show that continuous use of eyes for more than 1 h is a high-risk factor for pre-myopia.
- (4)
- Digital screens: In recent years, with the prevalence of electronic products, especially smartphones and online courses, students spend more time on games and social media, such as Tik-Tok, WeChat, and QQ. Besides, schools assign homework through the Internetresults in students spending significantly increasing digital screens like smartphones and computers than before. One study found that the average time spent on digital screens by primary school students in Shanghai was 2 h per day at school and significantly rose to 5 h during holidays (He, X. G., et al 2017). A survey from Taiwan revealed that students spent an average of 3.5 h per day looking at digital screens (Chang, F. C.et al. 2018)., significantly exceeding the recommendation issued by the American Academy of Pediatrics, in which students spend below 2 h per day on digital screens. Our findings showed that in the Science City Area, the percentage of primary school students who spent on digital screens over 2 h per day on average was 13.72%. When looking at digital screens, the pupils are constantly changing, which keeps the ciliary muscles tense and not well relaxed, resulting in hyperflexion of the lens and developing into pre-myopia. Furthermore, the results found that excessive screen time is a risk factor for pre-myopia, and it is recommended that home-school cooperation to reduce the amount of time students spend staring at screens.
- (5)
- Incorrect reading and writing postures: Inappropriate reading and writing posture can affect the body shape and lead to scoliosis and are closely related to vision (Pan, Y. P.et al. . 2009). Studies show that the proportion of primary school students with incorrect reading and writing postures is more than 70% (Zhu, X. F.,.et al.2014; Tan, H. 2010). Our survey finds that in the Science City Area, the proportion of primary school students who read and write improperly is as high as 75.23%, and thus urgent attention ought to be paid by parents and schools. Such incorrect postures are commonly associated with a short reading and writing distance, resulting in the extension of axial length (Lee, Y. et al. 2013). and pre-myopia, so correcting students’ reading and writing postures is one of the most important ways to prevent myopia, which requires the full cooperation and efforts of schools and parents.
Ethics and Conflict of Interest
Acknowledgments
References
- Chang, F. C., and et al. 2018. Computer/Mobile Device Screen Time of Children and Their Eye Care Behavior: The Roles of Risk Perception and Parenting. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking 21, 3: 179–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, X. J., H. Yi, and S. Yi. 2022. Changes of adolescent binocular regulatory function after 1%atropine eye gel in treating early myopia. Chongqing Medicine 51, 2: 234–238. [Google Scholar]
- Chinese Optometric Association, Chinese Ophthalmological Society, Ophthalmology and Optometry Committee, Ophthalmologists Association, and Chinese Doctor Association. 2019. Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology and Visual Science 21, 1: 1–4.
- Goldschmidt, E., and N. Jacobsen. 2014. Genetic and environmental effects on myopia development and progression. Eye (London, England) 28, 2: 126–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Guggenheim, J. A., and et al. 2000. The heritability of high myopia: A reanalysis of Goldschmidt’s data. Journal of Medical Genetics 37, 3: 227–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- He, X. G., and et al. 2017. Reading and writing postures of primary school students in Shanghai and associated factors. Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology 25, 3: 14–218. [Google Scholar]
- Ip, J. M., and et al. 2007. Ethnic differences in the impact of parental myopia: Findings from a population-based study of 12-year-old Australian children. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 48, 6: 2520–2528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lao, Y. Q., and et al. 2019. Effects of increased outdoor activity time on the development of myopia in school-age children. Maternal and Child Health Care of China 34, 10: 2364–2366. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, Y. 2013. What factors are associated with myopia in young adults? A survey study in Taiwan Military Conscripts. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science 54, 2: 1026–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. 2008. Basic knowledge and requirements for preventing nearsightedness in primary and middle school students. Retrieved April 28, 2023, from http://www.gov.cn/govweb/fwxx/wy/2008-09/05/content_1088072_4.htm.
- Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China, National Health Commission, General Administration of Sport, Ministry of Finance of the People’s Republic of China, Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security of the People’s Republic of China, State Administration for Market Regulation, and National Radio and Television Administration. 2018. Comprehensive prevention and control of myopia among children and adolescents. Chinese Journal of School Health 39, 9: 1279–1280. [Google Scholar]
- Mutti, D. O., and et al. 2002. Parental myopia, near work, school achievement, and children’s refractive error. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 43, 12: 3633–3640. [Google Scholar]
- Pan, Y. P., and et al. 2009. Current situation analysis on reading and writing postures of primary school students in Beijing Dongcheng District. Chinese Journal of School Health 30, 2: 173–174. [Google Scholar]
- Tan, H. 2010. Epidemiological Characters of Vision Care Behaviors and Intervention Study in Shanghai Primary Schools. Doctoral Thesis, Fudan University. https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/de-tail/detail.aspx?dbname=CDFD0911&filename=2010194479.nh.
- Wang, F., and et al. 2019. Research progress on main environmental risk factors for adolescent myopia and their mechanisms. Practical Preventive Medicine 26, 7: 893–897. [Google Scholar]
- Wei, R. H., and et al. 2019. Interpretation of the International Myopia Institute white papers focusing on myopia prevention and control. Recent Advances in Ophthalmology 39, 8: 701–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Q. 2015. Evaluation of extending outdoor time on myopia prevention among school children. Chinese Journal of School Health 36, 3: 363–365. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, Z., and et al. 2009. Clinical and linkage study on a consanguineous Chinese family with auto-somal recessive high myopia. Molecular Vision 15: 312–318. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, M., and et al. 2022. Effect of Physical Activities on Myopia in School-Age Children: A Meta Analysis. Sport Science Research 43, 1: 55–64, 83. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, X., and et al. 2017. Dopamine signaling and myopia development: What are the key challenges. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research 61: 60–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, X. F., and et al. 2014. Prevalence of ametropia and visual impairment in elementary school students in Baoshan District of Shanghai. Chinese Journal of Experimental Ophthalmology 32, 5: 451–456. [Google Scholar]
Age (People) | Male/Female (People) | Pre-Myopia | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Male | Female | Overall | ||
6 (291) | 133/158 | 66 (49.62) | 77 (48.73) | 143 (49.14) |
7 (321) | 150/171 | 83 (55.33) | 95 (55.56) | 178 (55.45) |
8 (337) | 183/154 | 116 (63.39) | 90 (58.44) | 206 (61.13) |
9 (335) | 163/172 | 96 (58.90) | 106 (61.63) | 202 (60.30) |
10 (320) | 178/142 | 63 (35.39) | 47 (33.10) | 110 (34.38) |
11 (353) | 193/160 | 60 (31.09) | 52 (32.50) | 112 (31.73) |
12 (313) | 161/152 | 41 (25.47) | 28 (18.42) | 69 (22.04) |
(2253) | 1198/1055 | 525 (43.82) | 495 (46.92) | 1020 (45.27) |
Variable | Grouping | Number of People | Constituent Ratio | Pre-Myopia | Prevalence Rate | x2 | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
At Least One Parent with Severe Myopia | Yes | 116 | 5.15 | 73 | 62.93 | 5.204 | 0.023 |
No | 2137 | 94.85 | 947 | 44.31 | |||
At least one parent with myopia | Yes | 1812 | 80.43 | 873 | 48.18 | 12.695 | 0.000 |
No | 441 | 19.57 | 147 | 33.33 | |||
Average time spent out-doors per day below 2 h in the last two weeks | Yes | 302 | 13.40 | 178 | 58.94 | 9.187 | 0.002 |
No | 1951 | 86.68 | 842 | 43.16 | |||
Continuous use of eyes over 1 h | Yes | 861 | 38.22 | 542 | 62.95 | 63.832 | 0.000 |
No | 1392 | 61.78 | 478 | 34.34 | |||
Lack of sleep | Yes | 217 | 9.63 | 132 | 60.83 | 8.073 | 0.004 |
No | 2036 | 90.37 | 888 | 43.61 | |||
Average time spent on digital screen per day over 2 h | Yes | 309 | 13.72 | 205 | 66.34 | 21.609 | 0.000 |
No | 1944 | 86.28 | 815 | 41.92 | |||
Incorrect reading and writing posture | Yes | 1695 | 75.23 | 682 | 40.24 | 24.743 | 0.000 |
No | 558 | 24.77 | 338 | 60.57 | |||
Average time spent doing homework per day over 2 h | Yes | 642 | 28.50 | 325 | 50.62 | 11.253 | 0.001 |
No | 1611 | 71.50 | 695 | 43.14 |
Influencing factor | β | SE | Waldχ2 | p | OR | 95%CI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
At least one parent with myopia | 0.64 | 0.043 | 65.31 | <0.01 | 1.746 | 1.572–1.984 |
Time spent outdoors per day below 2 h in the last two weeks | 0.59 | 0.039 | 136.28 | <0.01 | 1.827 | 1.668–2.032 |
Continuous use of eyes over 1 h | 0.43 | 0.056 | 40.37 | <0.01 | 1.478 | 1.384–1.874 |
Time spent on digital screen per day over 2 h | 0.28 | 0.038 | 22.31 | <0.01 | 1.583 | 1.468–1.892 |
Incorrect reading and writing posture | 0.47 | 0.043 | 38.42 | <0.01 | 1.672 | 1.487–1.924 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024, Deng et al. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Deng, Y.-b.; Wang, X.-y.; Xiao, L.-g.; Xu, P.l.; Wang, H.-M.; Zhao, G.-Z.; Ye, L.; Men, D.-W.; Yan, M. Analysis of Risk Factors Associated with Pre-Myopia Among Primary School Students in the Mianyang Science City. J. Eye Mov. Res. 2024, 17, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.17.1.3
Deng Y-b, Wang X-y, Xiao L-g, Xu Pl, Wang H-M, Zhao G-Z, Ye L, Men D-W, Yan M. Analysis of Risk Factors Associated with Pre-Myopia Among Primary School Students in the Mianyang Science City. Journal of Eye Movement Research. 2024; 17(1):1-9. https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.17.1.3
Chicago/Turabian StyleDeng, Yi-bin, Xiao-yin Wang, Li-ge Xiao, Pei li Xu, Hui-Min Wang, Guo-Zhong Zhao, Lian Ye, Da-Wei Men, and Mei Yan. 2024. "Analysis of Risk Factors Associated with Pre-Myopia Among Primary School Students in the Mianyang Science City" Journal of Eye Movement Research 17, no. 1: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.17.1.3
APA StyleDeng, Y.-b., Wang, X.-y., Xiao, L.-g., Xu, P. l., Wang, H.-M., Zhao, G.-Z., Ye, L., Men, D.-W., & Yan, M. (2024). Analysis of Risk Factors Associated with Pre-Myopia Among Primary School Students in the Mianyang Science City. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 17(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.17.1.3