Does Descriptive Text Change How People Look at Art? A Novel Analysis of Eye—Movements Using Data—Driven Units of Interest
Abstract
Introduction
“A frontal bust portrait of the artist as a young wom-an with her hair tied up, wearing a pale coat with white collar and matching hat, set at an angle. At her neck she wears a decorative pink neck scarf. Her skin and features are smoothly and evenly painted, in comparison to her more textured clothes. She is set against a dark plain background.”
Background
Art and Eye-Tracking
Defining Areas of Interest
Methods
Procedure
Stimuli
Analysis
Results
Discussion
Limitations
Conclusions and Future Work
Ethics and Conflict of Interest
Acknowledgments
References
- Borji, A., D. N. Sihite, and L. Itti. 2013. What stands out in a scene? A study of human explicit saliency judgment. Vision Research 91: 62–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brieber, D., M. Nadal, H. Leder, and R. Rosenberg. 2014. Art in time and space: Context modulates the relation between art experience and viewing time. PLoS ONE 9, 6: 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brinkmann, H., L. Commare, H. Leder, and R. Rosenburg. 2013. Abstract Art as a Universal Language? Leonardo 46, 5: 488–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bubic, A., A. Susac, and M. Palmovic. 2014. Keeping our eyes on the eyes: The case of Arcimboldo. Perception 43, 5: 465–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Core R Team. 2014. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available online: http://www.r-project.org/.
- Davies, A. 2016. ECG Eye-tracking Experiment 1. The University of Manchester: Manchester. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davies, A. 2017. Manchester Art Gallery Eye-tracking Analysis. The University of Manchester: Manchester. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ester, M., H.-P. Kriegel, J. Sander, and X. Xu. 1996. A Density-Based Algorithm for Discovering Clusters in Large Spatial Databases with Noise. In KDD-96 Proceedings. pp. 226–231. [Google Scholar]
- Field, A., J. Miles, and Z. Field. 2012. Discovering statistics using R. Los Angeles: Sage. [Google Scholar]
- Gail, G. 2010. Your labels make me feel stupid. Available online: http://www.webcitation.org/6m77vjVPX.
- Gartus, A., N. Klemer, and H. Leder. 2015. The effects of visual context and individual differences on perception and evaluation of modern art and graffiti art. Acta Psychologica 156: 64–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gartus, A., and H. Leder. 2014. The white cube of the museum versus the gray cube of the street: the role of context in aesthetic evaluations. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 8, 3: 311–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goldberg, J. H., and X. P. Kotval. 1999. Computer interface evaluation using eye movements: Methods and constructs. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 24, 6: 631–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hahsler, M. 2016. dbscan: Density Based Clustering of Applications with Noise (DBSCAN) and Related Algorithms. Available online: http://cran.r-project.org/package=dbscan.
- Holmqvist, K., M. Nystrom, R. Anderson, R. Dewhurst, H. Jarodzka, and J. Van de Weijer. 2011. Eye tracking: A comprehensive guide to methods and measures. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Kapoula, Z., G. Daunys, O. Herbez, and Q. Yang. 2009. Effect of title on eye-movement exploration of cubist paintings by Fernand Léger. Perception 38, 4: 479–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Klein, C., J. Betz, M. Hirschbuehl, C. Fuchs, B. Schmiedtov, M. Engelbrecht, and R. Rosenberg. 2014. Describing art-An interdisciplinary approach to the effects of speaking on gaze movements during the beholding of paintings. PLoS ONE 9, 12: 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Knijnenburg, T. a., L. F. a Wessels, M. J. T. Reinders, and I. Shmulevich. 2009. Fewer permutations, more accurate P-values. Bioinformatics 25, 12: 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kreplin, U., V. Thoma, and P. Rodway. 2014. Looking behaviour and preference for artworks: The role of emotional valence and location. Acta Psychologica 152: 100–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kübler, T. C., K. Sippel, W. Fuhl, G. Schievelbein, J. Aufreiter, R. Rosenberg, and E. Kasneci. 2015. Analysis of eye movements with eyetrace. Communications in Computer and Information Science. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Levenshtein, V. I. 1966. Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Soviet Physics Doklady. [Google Scholar]
- Massaro, D., F. Savazzi, C. Dio, D. Freedberg, V. Gallese, G. Gilli, and A. Marchetti. 2012. When art moves the eyes: A behavioral and eye-tracking study. PLoS ONE 7, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- McNamara, a, T. Booth, and S. Sridharan. 2012. Directing gaze in narrative art. Acm Sap 2012, vol. 1, pp. 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nagai, M., M. Oyana-Higa, and T. Miao. 2007. Relationship between image gaze location and fractal dimension. Conference Proceedings-IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics; pp. 4014–4018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Orquin, J. L., N. J. S. Ashby, and A. D. F. Clarke. 2016. Areas of Interest as a Signal Detection Problem in Behavioral Eye-Tracking Research. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 29, 2–3: 103–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Over, E. a B., I. T. C. Hooge, and C. J. Erkelens. 2006. A quantitative measure for the uniformity of fixation density: The Voronoi method. Behavior Research Methods 38, 2: 251–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Quiroga, R. Q., and C. Pedreira. 2011. How do we see art: an eye-tracker study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 5, 98: 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reani, M. 2017. Scanpath analysis of 2-grams using Hellinger distance. The University of Manchester. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilcox, R. R. 2010. Fundamentals of Modern Statistical Methods. Fundamentals of Modern Statistical Methods: Substantially Improving Power and Accuracy, 2nd ed. Springer Verlag. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilcox, R. R. 2012. Introduction to Robust Estimation and Hypothesis Testing. Introduction to Robust Estimation and Hypothesis Testing, 3rd ed. Elsevier. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Copyright © 2017 2017 International Association of Orofacial Myology
Share and Cite
Davies, A.; Reani, M.; Vigo, M.; Harper, S.; Gannaway, C.; Grimes, M.; Jay, C. Does Descriptive Text Change How People Look at Art? A Novel Analysis of Eye—Movements Using Data—Driven Units of Interest. J. Eye Mov. Res. 2017, 10, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.10.4.4
Davies A, Reani M, Vigo M, Harper S, Gannaway C, Grimes M, Jay C. Does Descriptive Text Change How People Look at Art? A Novel Analysis of Eye—Movements Using Data—Driven Units of Interest. Journal of Eye Movement Research. 2017; 10(4):1-13. https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.10.4.4
Chicago/Turabian StyleDavies, Alan, Manuele Reani, Markel Vigo, Simon Harper, Clare Gannaway, Martin Grimes, and Caroline Jay. 2017. "Does Descriptive Text Change How People Look at Art? A Novel Analysis of Eye—Movements Using Data—Driven Units of Interest" Journal of Eye Movement Research 10, no. 4: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.10.4.4
APA StyleDavies, A., Reani, M., Vigo, M., Harper, S., Gannaway, C., Grimes, M., & Jay, C. (2017). Does Descriptive Text Change How People Look at Art? A Novel Analysis of Eye—Movements Using Data—Driven Units of Interest. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 10(4), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.10.4.4