Next Article in Journal
Exploring the Frequency and Risk Factors of Hyperprogressive Disease in Patients with Advanced Melanoma Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
Next Article in Special Issue
Sex-Related Differences in Immunotherapy Outcomes of Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
The Importance of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in Oncological Vulvoperineal Defect Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Symptom Burden on Quality of Life in Patients with Lung Cancer
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Antibody–Drug Conjugates for the Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Central Nervous System Metastases

by
David J. H. Bian
1,
Sara F. Cohen
2,
Anna-Maria Lazaratos
3,4,
Nathaniel Bouganim
5 and
Matthew Dankner
1,4,*
1
Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1G1, Canada
2
Department of Anatomy & Cell Biology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1G1, Canada
3
Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montreal. Montreal, QC H3A 1G1, Canada
4
Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1G1, Canada
5
Department of Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H3A 1G1, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2024, 31(10), 6314-6342; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31100471
Submission received: 19 September 2024 / Revised: 14 October 2024 / Accepted: 16 October 2024 / Published: 18 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Management and Outcomes of Lung Cancer Patients)

Abstract

:
Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) represent an emerging class of targeted anticancer agents that have demonstrated impressive efficacy in numerous cancer types. In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), ADCs have become a component of the treatment armamentarium for a subset of patients with metastatic disease. Emerging data suggest that some ADCs exhibit impressive activity even in central nervous system (CNS) metastases, a disease site that is difficult to treat and associated with poor prognosis. Herein, we describe and summarize the existing evidence surrounding ADCs in NSCLC with a focus on CNS activity.

1. Introduction

Lung cancer is diagnosed in approximately 32,000 Canadians each year and causes approximately 21,000 deaths annually, rendering it the number one cause of cancer-related deaths in Canadian men and women [1]. Globally, lung cancer is similarly the most common cancer with an incidence rate of over 2,400,000 cases and a mortality rate of over 1,800,000 deaths in 2022 [2]. The central nervous system (CNS) is a frequent site of metastasis in both small cell lung cancer and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and is associated with a poor prognosis [3,4,5]. CNS metastases include metastases to the brain parenchyma (denoted as brain metastases (BM)), as well as leptomeningeal metastases (LM), which involve cancer cells reaching the subarachnoid space that harbors the cerebrospinal fluid surrounding the brain and spinal cord [6].
The current management of CNS metastases is multifaceted. Current modalities for treatment include surgical resection, radiation therapy approaches, such as stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), and systemic therapies including chemotherapy, targeted therapies, and immunotherapies [7,8]. Surgical approaches are generally reserved for NSCLC patients with one or few large and symptomatic BM [9].
The medical management of NSCLC BM remains challenging. The blood–brain barrier (BBB) and efflux transporters in the brain endothelium represent significant impediments for traditional chemotherapies from accessing BM lesions [10,11]. However, small molecules targeting oncogenic driver mutations in NSCLC, such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) (osimertinib, gefitinib, erlotinib, amivantanab/lazertinib), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) (crizotinib, ceritinib, brigatinib, lorlatinib), ROS1 (entrectinib, lorlatinib), hepatocyte growth factor (MET) exon 14 skipping mutations (ex14mut) (capmatinib, tepotinib), rearranged during transfection (RET) fusions (selpercatinib), v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF) V600E (dabrafenib/trametinib), Kirsten rat sarcoma virus (KRAS) G12C (sotorasib), and neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) fusions (entrectinib, larotrectinib) have demonstrated activity in both LM and BM [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have similarly demonstrated efficacy in patients with NSCLC CNS metastases, particularly when combined with radiotherapy [26]. Interestingly, preclinical data suggest a mechanism of action for immunotherapy in BM whereby immune cells are primed against CNS metastases via exposure to cancer cells in the primary tumor or extracranial metastases following treatment with immunotherapy before homing to CNS metastases [27].
Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) represent a novel class of anticancer drugs that have arrived at the forefront of new treatment strategies for NSCLC in recent years with an emerging interest for its use in CNS metastases [28,29]. In this review, we will summarize and describe the literature evaluating ADCs in NSCLC, with a particular focus on BM.

2. Antibody–Drug Conjugates

ADCs are comprised of three key components: a monoclonal antibody targeting a tumor-expressed antigen, a cytotoxic payload, and a cleavable linker. These key components of an ADC play important roles in establishing its therapeutic, pharmacological, and toxicity profiles.

2.1. Antibodies and Antigens

The antibody moiety of an ADC molecule plays a significant role in its pharmacology, including its plasma circulation time, target specificity, and immunogenicity. The landscape of approved ADCs predominantly includes full-size immunoglobulin G (IgG), particularly IgG1 [30]. The IgG1 subclass offers a long serum half-life and robust Fc-mediated effector functions, including antibody cell- and complement-mediated cytotoxicity, and antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis [31]. Murine and chimeric antibodies used in the design of early ADCs have been largely replaced with humanized variants to minimize immunogenic adverse effects [32].
The selection of a suitable target antigen for these antibody moieties has also proven to be critical to the successful development of effective ADC molecules. An ideal target can be described as one that is highly expressed on malignant cells and minimally expressed on healthy cells [33]. Current targets of ADCs for NSCLC that are either approved or in late-stage clinical development include human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2 (TROP2), human epidermal growth factor receptor 3 (HER3), and MET [34]. ADCs directed against these targets are currently being clinically evaluated as both monotherapy and in combination with other agents, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) [34].
Several of these targets are significant in the context of BM given expression patterns of the target antigens specifically in CNS lesions. HER2 and HER3 have both been found to be consistently overexpressed in breast and NSCLC BM, representing targets poised for clinical activity in this setting [35,36,37,38,39,40]. MET is also commonly overexpressed or amplified in NCSLC BM, potentially establishing MET as an important functional mediator of BM that can be targeted for therapeutic benefit [41,42,43,44]. Together, the antigen targets of many of the ADCs that are approved or in the late stages of development for NSCLC are primed for promising activity in the CNS given their overexpression in BM.

2.2. Linkers

Linkers are molecular sequences that covalently connect the antibody to a cytotoxic payload. Their main roles are to prevent the premature release of the payload in the circulation while ensuring its release at the target site. Linkers can be broadly categorized into either cleavable or non-cleavable variants depending on the release mechanisms of their cytotoxic payloads [45]. Cleavable linkers are versatile and widely employed in ADC development. These linkers chemically release the payload through reduction, proteolysis, or hydrolysis based on specific tumor cell–associated processes, such as acidification, glutathione reduction, or lysosomal protease activity [46,47]. Non-cleavable linkers consist of chemical structures that are not fragmented by enzymatic degradation. They resist conventional biochemical processes and require complete lysosomal degradation for payload release. This increases the likelihood of payload release within the target cells while minimizing cytotoxic effects on healthy cells [48]. Non-cleavable linkers generally result in less toxicity and have a longer half-life when compared to cleavable linkers [32,49]. One major disadvantage of non-cleavable linkers, however, is the lack of antitumor activity against adjacent neoplastic cells that may not express the target antigen of the ADC (i.e., bystander killing) [50].

2.3. Cytotoxic Payloads

Payloads are the cytotoxic component with the direct tumor-killing activity. Ideally, the payload must have a low molecular weight, high stability, and high cytotoxicity [49,51]. In fact, payloads used in ADCs are generally 100- to 1000-fold more potent than chemotherapies because they are designed to specifically target cancer cells [49]. To achieve potent cytotoxic activity, recent ADC design strategies have focused on the optimization of the drug–antibody ratio (DAR) [33]. The DAR is the average number of payload molecules conjugated to each antibody molecule, with common DARs ranging from 2 to 8 [52]. Although ADCs with higher DARs have expectedly greater in vitro potency, preclinical studies suggest that these molecules may be subject to unfavorable pharmacokinetic properties, including increased hepatic clearance and less favorable toxicity profiles that lead to narrower therapeutic indices [53].
General categories of cytotoxic payloads include tubulin inhibitors and DNA-damaging agents. Examples of tubulin inhibitors are the auristatins (e.g., MMAE and MMAF) and the maytansinoids (e.g., DM1 and DM4). These agents disrupt the assembly and disassembly of microtubules, leading to cell cycle arrest and apoptosis [49,51,54]. DNA-damaging drugs act as crosslinkers and alkylators. The most used DNA-damaging payloads are topoisomerase I inhibitors, such as camptothecin derivatives. Non-chemotherapeutic payloads such as immunostimulatory agents that generate an antitumoral immune response and radionuclides that deliver cytotoxic radiation to tumor cells are also being developed [55,56].

3. Antibody–Drug Conjugates and Brain Metastases

ADCs have become a part of the standard of care for various cancer types, including breast, gynecological, urological, and hematological cancers [57]. Because patients with active and/or untreated BM are often excluded from clinical trials, the intracranial activity of ADCs specifically for CNS metastases has been largely undefined [28]. However, several recent clinical trials in breast cancer have evaluated the ADC trastuzumab deruxtecan (TDXd) specifically for patients with BM, demonstrating encouraging results. The phase II TUXEDO-1 trial evaluated TDXd in 15 HER2-positive breast cancer patients with active BM who were either previously untreated or were refractory to local treatment [58]. The trial demonstrated an intracranial overall response rate (ORR) of 73.3% and a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 21.0 months [59,60]. The phase II DEBBRAH trial evaluated TDXd in HER2-positive breast cancer in distinct cohorts, including patients with stable BM treated with local therapy, patients with asymptomatic and untreated BM, patients with progressive BM refractory to local therapy, and patients with LM. The first data read out from this study, which excluded the LM cohort, demonstrated an intracranial ORR of 66.7% and a 6-month PFS rate of 78.7% [61]. Separate publication of the LM cohort demonstrated an mPFS of 8.9 months and a median overall survival (mOS) of 13.3 months [62]. Most recently, the DESTINY-Breast12 study enrolled 263 patients with HER2-positive breast cancer and BM. CNS-specific ORR and 12-month CNS-specific PFS were, respectively, 79.2% and 57.8% in patients with stable BM and 62.3% and 60.1% in patients with active BM [63]. Thus far, no clinical trials have been performed with ADCs in NSCLC specifically for patients with CNS metastases. However, multiple studies have included subsets of patients with BM.

4. HER2 Antibody–Drug Conjugates

HER2 is a transmembrane receptor tyrosine kinase encoded by the ERBB2 gene that, under normal conditions and upon ligand binding by its dimerization partner (e.g., EGFR or HER3), heterodimerizes to activate a variety of downstream signaling pathways such as the phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI3K) and the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways. When HER2 is mutated or amplified during tumorigenesis, it becomes constitutively activated in the absence of ligand binding, leading to enhanced dimerization resulting in downstream signaling and cell proliferation [64]. In NSCLC, HER2 is implicated as an oncogene via amplification, protein overexpression, or HER2 mutations, the most common of which are exon 20 insertion mutations [65,66].
Approximately 2% of tumors from patients with NSCLC harbor HER2-activating mutations [64]. HER2 mutations in NSCLC are associated with young age, female sex, never smoker status, and advanced, more aggressive disease that is associated with poor prognoses [67,68,69,70,71,72,73]. Patients with HER2-mutant NSCLC have a high incidence of BM, with point estimates between 9–32% of patients, making these patients more likely to develop BM than KRAS or EGFR-mutant NSCLC [66,67,68,69,70,71,74,75].
HER2 is amplified in 2–5% of patients with NSCLC, and the prevalence of BM in these patients is between 2 and 22% [65,73,76,77]. In the 2–30% of patients with NSCLC whose tumor has HER2 protein overexpression, the prevalence of BM is approximately 7–23% [72,73,76]. Compared to HER2-mutant NSCLC, patients with NSCLC whose tumors have HER2 amplification or protein overexpression are not associated with any specific clinicopathological features, such as age, sex, smoking status, or stage at diagnosis [66,72]. Furthermore, the prognosis of NSCLC patients with HER2 amplification appears to be similar to that of NSCLC patients with HER2 mutations [78].

4.1. Trastuzumab Emtansine

Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) is an ADC with a DAR of 3.5:1 that consists of trastuzumab, a humanized anti-HER2 IgG1 monoclonal antibody, and emtansine, a derivative of the tubulin inhibitor drug maytansine, which are linked via a nonreducible thioether linker (Figure 1) [79]. While it has been primarily studied in HER2-amplified breast cancer, it has also been investigated in patients with advanced-stage NSCLC, including those with HER2 mutations and HER2 overexpression [80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87]. In HER2-mutant NSCLC patients with locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic disease, T-DM1 showed an ORR of 38–44%, an mPFS of 2.8–5.0 months, and an mOS of 5.0–8.1 months (Figure 1) [84,85,88]. In patients with HER2 overexpressing locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic NSCLC, T-DM1 demonstrated an ORR of 6.7–20.0%, an mPFS of 2.0–2.6 months, and an mOS of 10.9–12.2 months (Figure 1) [86,87,88]. Together, these results suggest a limited role for T-DM1 in HER2-altered NSCLC.
To date, no clinical trials using T-DM1 for patients with NSCLC have included subgroup analyses on patients with BM, nor have there been studies specifically analyzing this patient population. However, in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer with BM, the KAMILLA trial, which studied patients with advanced HER2-positive breast cancer, also included BM patients with untreated and asymptomatic or previously irradiated and controlled disease. The study has shown an ORR of 21.4%, an mPFS of 5.5 months, and an mOS of 18.9 months with T-DM1 [83]. Furthermore, a subgroup analysis of the DESTINY-Breast03 trial comparing T-DM1 to TDXd in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer demonstrated a clinical inferiority of T-DM1 versus TDXd [82].

4.2. Trastuzumab Deruxtecan

TDXd is an ADC with a DAR of 8:1 consisting of trastuzumab and deruxtecan (DXd), an exatecan with potent topoisomerase I inhibitory activity (Figure 1) [50]. The antibody and payload are linked by a protease-cleavable maleimide tetrapeptide linker, which is cleaved through lysosomal enzyme activity during ADC internalization.
TDXd has been granted accelerated approval by the U.S. Food and Drug administration (FDA) for treatment-refractory, unresectable HER2-mutated NSCLC, as well as for adult patients with unresectable or metastatic HER2-positive solid tumors who have received prior systemic therapy and have no alternative treatment options [89,90].
The phase II DESTINY-Lung01 study investigated TDXd in patients with either HER2-mutant or HER2-overexpressing NSCLC. In patients whose tumors harbored HER2 mutations, TDXd elicited an ORR of 55%, an mPFS of 8.2 months, and an mOS of 17.8 months (Figure 1) (Table 1). Importantly, the DESTINY-Lung01 study included a cohort of HER2-mutant NSCLC patients with stable BM, comprising 33 of the 91 (36.3%) patients included in the study (Figure 2) (Table 1). These patients experienced an ORR of 54.5%, an mPFS of 7.1 months, and an mOS of 13.8 months, results that are comparable to the cohort-at-large (Table 1) (Figure 2) [89].
The DESTINY-Lung01 trial also included a cohort of patients with treatment-refractory advanced NSCLC with HER2 overexpression. This arm of the trial included two dosing regimens with TDXd given at 5.4 mg/kg and 6.4 mg/kg. In the cohort-at-large, the 5.4 mg/kg regimen produced an ORR of 34.1%, an mPFS of 6.7 months, and an mOS of 11.2 months, while the 6.4 mg/kg regimen resulted in an ORR of 26.5%, an mPFS of 5.7 months, and an mOS of 12.4 months (Figure 1) (Table 1). Of the patients included in the study, 12 out of 41 (29.3%) in the 5.4 mg/kg cohort and 17 of 49 (34.7%) in the 6.4 mg/kg cohort had stable BM (Figure 2) (Table 1). In this subgroup of BM patients, the 5.4 mg/kg regimen showed an ORR of 50.0%, an mPFS of 7.1 months, and an mOS that was not reached, while the 6.4 mg/kg regimen showed an ORR of 29.0%, an mPFS of 4.6 months, and an mOS of 13.5 months (Figure 2) (Table 1) [91].
This study was followed by the DESTINY-Lung02 trial, which was performed to compare clinical benefits of TDXd with 5.4 mg/kg versus 6.4 mg/kg dosing in patients with advanced NSCLC and HER2 mutations. In the cohort-at-large, the ORR was 49% and 56% in patients receiving 5.4 mg/kg and 6.4 mg/kg of TDXd, respectively (Figure 1) (Table 1). Of the patients included in the study, 35 out of 102 (34.3%) in the 5.4 mg/kg cohort and 22 of 50 (44.0%) in the 6.4 mg/kg cohort had stable BM (Figure 2) (Table 1). In this cohort of BM patients, the ORR was 60% and 45.5% in patients receiving 5.4 mg/kg and 6.4 mg/kg of TDXd, respectively (Figure 2) (Table 1) [92].
Table 1. Summary of available clinical trials of antibody–drug conjugates in non-small cell lung cancer patients containing survival data of brain metastases.
Table 1. Summary of available clinical trials of antibody–drug conjugates in non-small cell lung cancer patients containing survival data of brain metastases.
TrialPMIDPatient PopulationTreatment ArmsCNS Metastasis EligibilityALL PATIENTSPATIENTS WITH BM
Population Size (N)ORRDCRMedian DORMedian PFSMedian OSPopulation Size (N)ORRDCRMedian DORMedian PFSMedian OS
HERTHENA-Lung01PMID: 37689979 [93] Previously treated patients (EGFR-TKI or platinum-based chemotherapy) with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with EGFR-activating mutations (exon 19 deletion or L858R)Patritumab deruxtecan 5.6 mg/kgStable BM22529.8%73.8%6.4 months5.5 months11.9 months11528.7%70.4%5.5 months4.3 months11.6 months
U31402-A-U102PMID: 34548309 [94] Previously treated patients (EGFR-TKI) with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with EGFR-activating mutationsPatritumab deruxtecan 5.6 mg/kgStable BM5739.0%72.0%6.9 months8.2 monthsNA2532.0%NANANANA
BL-B01D1PMID: 38823410 [95]Locally advanced or metastatic patients with solid tumors, including NSCLC for which no standard treatment was availableBL-B01D1 dose escalation to 3.0 mg/kg, 3.5 mg/kg, or 6.0 mg/kgStable BMmEGFR: 40; wt EGFR: 62mEGFR: 52.9%; wtEGFR: 30.6%mEGFR: 87.5%; wtEGFR: 87.1%mEGFR: 8.5 months; wtEGFR: NEmEGFR: 5.6 months; wtEGFR: 5.4 monthsNAmEGFR: 17; wtEGFR: 10mEGFR: 41.2%; wtEGFR: 20.0%mEGFR: 100.0%; wtEGFR: 100.0%NANANA
DESTINY Lung-01PMID: 38547891 [91]Unresectable or metastatic NSCLC patients that was refractory to standard treatment with HER2 overexpressionTrastuzumab deruxtecan 5.4 mg/kg versus 6.4 mg/kgStable BM5.4 mg/kg 41; 6.4 mg/kg: 495.4 mg/kg: 34.1%; 6.4 mg/kg: 26.5%5.4 mg/kg: 78.0%; 6.4 mg/kg: 69.4%5.4 mg/kg: 6.2 months; 6.4 mg/kg: 5.8 months5.4 mg/kg: 6.7 months; 6.4 mg/kg: 5.7 months5.4 mg/kg: 11.2 months; 6.4 mg/kg: 12.4 months5.4 mg/kg 12; 6.4 mg/kg: 175.4 mg/kg: 50.0%; 6.4 mg/kg: 29.0%NANA5.4 mg/kg: 7.1 months; 6.4 mg/kg: 4.6 months5.4 mg/kg: NE; 6.4 mg/kg: 13.5 months
DESTINY Lung-01PMID: 34534430 [89]Unresectable or metastatic NSCLC patients that was refractory to standard treatment with HER2 mutationsTrastuzumab deruxtecan 6.4 mg/kgStable BM9155.0%92.0%9.3 months8.2 months17.8 months3354.5%NANA7.1 months13.8 months
DESTINY Lung-02PMID: 37694347 [92]Unresectable or metastatic NSCLC patients that was previously treated with standard treatment with HER2 mutationsTrastuzumab deruxtecan 5.4 mg/kg versus 6.4 mg/kg Stable BM5.4 mg/kg: 102, 6.4 mg/kg: 505.4 mg/kg: 49%, 6.4 mg/kg: 56%5.4 mg/kg: 93.1%, 6.4 mg/kg: 92.0%5.4 mg/kg: 16.8 months, 6.4 mg/kg: NE5.4 mg/kg: 9.9 months, 6.4 mg/kg: 15.4 months5.4 mg/kg: 19.5 months, 6.4 mg/kg: NE5.4 mg/kg: 35, 6.4 mg/kg: 225.4 mg/kg: 60%, 6.4 mg/kg: 45.5%NANANANA
Abbreviations. BM, brain metastases; CNS, central nervous system; DCR, disease control rate; DOR, duration of response; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; kg, kilogram; mg, milligram; mEGFR, mutant epidermal growth factor receptor; NA, not available; NE, not estimable; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; ORR, overall response rate; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; PMID, PubMed identifier; TKI, tyrosine-kinase inhibitor; wtEGFR, wild-type EGFR.
Importantly, CNS-specific outcomes were not published for the DESTINY-Lung01, nor the DESTINY-Lung02 trials. Despite this, the findings from the DESTINY-Lung01 and DESTINY-Lung02 studies suggest that patients with stable BM experience systemic ORR and PFS that is similar to the cohort-at-large, and that the additional toxicity seen with the 6.4 mg/kg dose does not add additional therapeutic activity beyond what was observed with 5.4 mg/kg in both HER2-mutant and overexpressing NSCLC.
Outside of NSCLC, TDXd has demonstrated impressive efficacy in the CNS when studied in prospective and retrospective cohorts of breast cancer patients who had stable or active and progressive CNS metastases [58,60,61,62,63,96,97]. These findings, in combination with the DESTINY-Lung01 and DESTINY-Lung02 trials, suggest that patients with HER2-mutated or overexpressing BM may be uniquely poised to experience similar treatment outcomes compared to patients without BM when treated with TDXd. While DESTINY-Lung01 and DESTINY-Lung02 are single-armed studies, it is apparent that HER2-mutated NSCLC patients would likely experience superior outcomes when treated with TDXd compared to an alternative standard of care [89,91,92,98]. Importantly, the same cannot be said for patients with NSCLC whose extracranial tumors overexpress HER2, for whom ORR and mPFS in the DESTINY-Lung01 trial are closer to historical controls [91,98]. For this reason, the subgroup of patients with HER2-overexpressing NSCLC who specifically have CNS metastases, after further study, may be uniquely positioned to derive benefit from TDXd compared to alternative agents that possess poor intracranial activity

4.3. Other HER2-Targeting ADCs

Novel ADCs targeting HER2 alterations in NSCLC are currently being investigated in clinical trials. SHR-A1811 is a novel HER2-targeting ADC consisting of a trastuzumab antibody conjugated with a novel DNA topoisomerase I inhibitor payload (SHR9265) by a cleavable tetrapeptide-based linker (Figure 1). With a DAR of 6:1, SHR-A1811 has demonstrated superior membrane permeability, cytotoxicity, and antitumor activity in in vitro and in vivo preclinical models when compared with TDXd. Results from a phase I/II trial investigating SHR-A1811 in HER2-mutated advanced-staged and treatment-refractory NSCLC patients have shown an ORR of 38.1% and an mPFS of 9.5 months (Figure 1). Of the patients included in the study, 17 out of 63 (27.0%) had stable BM at enrollment, but no subgroup analysis on the survival outcomes of these patients has been published to date [99].

5. HER3 Antibody–Drug Conjugates

HER3, encoded by the ERBB3 gene, is a receptor tyrosine pseudokinase that has no intrinsic kinase activity but binds to ligands and dimerizes with other receptor tyrosine kinases, such as the ligand binding-impaired HER2 [100,101]. The overexpression of HER3 has been identified in a number of solid tumors in both pre- and post-treatment settings, including NSCLC [102]. HER3 expression can be identified by immunohistochemistry in most NSCLC specimens, and HER3 has consistently been found to be overexpressed in BM when compared to matched and unmatched primary tumors [36,38,39,103,104].

5.1. Patritumab Deruxtecan

Patritumab deruxtecan (HER3-DXd) is an ADC comprised of patritumab, a humanized anti-HER3 IgG1 monoclonal antibody, and deruxtecan. The two components are covalently linked with a tetrapeptide-based linker, with HER3-DXd having a DAR of 8:1 (Figure 1) [105].
HER3-DXd has been studied in clinical trials that included patients with breast cancer and NSCLC [93,94,106,107]. In NSCLC, the phase II HERTHENA-Lung01 study included patients with EGFR mutations who were refractory to EGFR–tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and platinum-based chemotherapy. The trial demonstrated an ORR of 29.8%, an mPFS of 5.5 months, and an mOS of 11.9 months (Figure 1) (Table 1). Of the patients included in the trial, 115 out of 225 (51.1%) had stable and asymptomatic BM, with an ORR of 28.7%, a median duration of response (mDOR) of 5.5 months, an mPFS of 4.3 months, and an mOS of 11.6 months in this subgroup, which is comparable to the cohort-at-large (Figure 2) (Table 1). Of note, 30 included patients had BM on diagnosis of NSCLC that was not pretreated with intracranial radiotherapy. This subgroup demonstrated an ORR of 33.3%, and an mDOR of 8.4 months [93]. The phase III trial HERTHENA-Lung02 is currently underway, evaluating patients with advanced NSCLC refractory to third-generation EGFR-TKIs, and also permits patients with stable BM to participate in the study (Table 2) [108]. The ongoing TUXEDO-03 trial is specifically tailored to evaluate HER3-DXd in patients with breast cancer or NSCLC with active BM who have received at least one previous line of systemic therapy in the advanced setting, and in metastatic solid tumor patients who have either treatment-naïve LM or post-radiation recurrent LM who do not require immediate local treatment (Table 2) [59].

5.2. Other HER3-Targeting Antibody–Drug Conjugates

BL-B01D1 is a first-in-class EGFR-HER3 bispecific ADC with a DAR of 8:1. BL-B01D1 consists of a bispecific humanized IgG1 anti-EGFR antibody fused to two anti-HER3 humanized single-chain fragment variables via glycine-serin linkers, a tetrapeptide-based cleavable link, and Ed-04, a camptothecin-based topoisomerase I inhibitor (Figure 1). Of note, the antibody component of BL-B01D1 can target both mutant and wild-type EGFR. A phase I study evaluated BL-B01D1 in locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC patients both with and without EGFR mutations, among multiple other solid tumors. The study included 102 patients with NSCLC, of which 27 (26.5%) had stable BM (Figure 2) (Table 1). In the NSCLC cohort, the ORR was 52.5% (95% confidence interval (CI): 37.5–67.1%) in patients with EGFR mutations and 30.6% (95% CI: 20.6–43.0%) in patients with wild-type EGFR (Figure 1) (Table 1). The mPFS was 5.6 months in patients with EGFR mutations and 5.4 months in patients with wild-type EGFR (Figure 1) (Table 1). In the cohort of patients with BM at the time of enrollment, the ORR was 41.2% (95% CI: 18.4–67.1%) in patients whose tumors harbored EGFR mutations, and 20.0% (95% CI: 2.5–55.6%) in patients with wild-type EGFR (Figure 1) (Table 1) [95]. A phase II trial to further characterize BL-B01D1 in metastatic NSCLC is currently underway (Table 2).

6. TROP2 Antibody–Drug Conjugates

TROP2 is encoded by the tumor-associated calcium signal transducer 2 (TACSTD2) gene expressed in many normal tissues [109]. TROP2 overexpression has been implicated in multiple cancers, including breast cancer, glioblastoma, and NSCLC [110].
In NSCLC, multiple studies have described TROP2 overexpression in patients with NSCLC, ranging from 42% to 100% of patients tested demonstrating intratumoral TROP2 expression by IHC [111,112,113,114]. Multiple studies have similarly shown that TROP2 overexpression has been associated with advanced tumor staging and shorter OS, particularly in lung adenocarcinomas [111,113,114,115,116]. TROP2 overexpression has also been implicated in treatment resistance and poor outcomes in NSCLC patients previously treated with ICIs [116].
In NSCLC BM, one study observed high levels of TROP2 expression at the RNA level that are ubiquitously present in resected BM of NSCLC patients, but no matched nor unmatched primary tumors were described as controls [117]. More studies are required to better understand if TROP2 overexpression status is enriched in NSCLC with BM.

6.1. Sacituzumab Govitecan

Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is an ADC with a DAR of 7.6:1 consisting of a humanized anti-TROP2 IgG1 kappa antibody and the topoisomerase I inhibitor SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan, which are linked by a pH-mediated hydrolysable linker (Figure 1) [118]. SG has demonstrated prolonged PFS and OS compared to single-agent physicians’ choice chemotherapy in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer [119,120]. In NSCLC, the phase III EVOKE-01 trial compared SG to docetaxel in patients with advanced NSCLC after progression on platinum-based chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy. In the study, patients with stable and/or previously treated BM were included with 35 out of 299 (11.7%) patients in the SG arm compared to 39 out of 304 (12.8%) patients in the docetaxel arm (Figure 1). The mOS and mPFS were not significantly higher in the SG arm versus the docetaxel arm, at 11.1 and 4.1 months versus 9.8 and 3.9 months, respectively (Figure 1). Despite the significant number of NSCLC BM patients included in the study, the authors did not describe survival outcomes in this subgroup [121].
While no studies have directly evaluated SG in NSCLC BM patients, a phase 0 clinical trial evaluated SG in 25 recurrent glioblastoma and triple negative breast cancer BM patients with treatment-refractory disease. This early phase study observed an intracranial ORR of 50% in breast cancer BM and 28% in glioblastoma, an mPFS of 8 months in breast cancer BM and 2 months in glioblastoma, and an mOS of 35.2 months in breast cancer BM and 9.5 months in glioblastoma [122].
In the context of negative survival outcomes with SG in NSCLC compared to docetaxel in the population at-large in the EVOKE-01 trial, and a lack of described subgroup analyses for the patients with BM included in the trial, it is unlikely that SG represents a viable therapeutic option with enhanced intracranial efficacy.

6.2. Datopotamab Deruxtecan

Datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) is an ADC with a DAR of 4:1 consisting of the humanized anti-TROP2 IgG1 monoclonal antibody datopotamab and deruxtecan, which are linked by a cleavable tetrapeptide-based linker (Figure 1) [123]. The phase I TROPION-PanTumor01 trial evaluated Dato-DXd in advanced-stage, treatment-refractory NSCLC patients. The study demonstrated an mPFS of 6.9 months, an mOS of 11.4 months, and an ORR of 26%. Of the patients included in the study, 68 out of 180 (37.8%) had stable and previously treated BM (Figure 1). However, the authors did not describe the survival outcomes in the BM subgroup [124].
Additionally, the phase III TROPION-Lung01 study compared Dato-DXd to docetaxel in advanced-stage NSCLC patients. When comparing Dato-DXd to docetaxel, the study demonstrated, respectively, an ORR of 26.4% versus 12.8%, an mPFS of 4.4 months versus 3.7 months, and an mOS of 12.9 months versus 11.8 months (Figure 1). Furthermore, a significant portion of the included patients had previously treated or inactive BM, with 79 out of 299 (26.4%) patients in the Dato-DXd group and 91 out of 305 (29.8%) patients in the docetaxel group. When comparing the PFS of Dato-DXd to docetaxel, patients with BM had a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.64 (95% CI: 0.38–1.05) while patients without BM had a HR of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.60–0.94), both favoring Dato-DXd (Figure 2). However, when comparing the OS of Dato-DXd to docetaxel, patients with BM had a HR of 1.09 (95% CI: 0.68–1.75) and patients without BM had a HR of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.74–1.12) (Figure 2) [125]. Both Dato-DXd alone and in combination with other therapies are currently being further investigated in multiple other clinical trials (Table 2) [126].

6.3. Sacituzumab Tirumotecan

Sacituzumab tirumotecan (SKB264) is an ADC with a DAR of 7.4:1 consisting of the previously described sacituzumab antibody and the payload tirumotecan, a belotecan-derivative topoisomerase I inhibitor, which are bound by a cleavable sulfonyl pyrimidine-CL2A-carbonate linker (Figure 1). In in vivo preclinical studies, SKB264 demonstrated a significantly longer half-life and superior intratumor payload concentration compared to SG [127]. In patients with advanced-stage, treatment-refractory NSCLC, SKB264 demonstrated an ORR of 26.0% and an mPFS of 5.3 months in the wild-type EGFR NSCLC group and an ORR of 60.0%, and an mPFS of 11.1 months in the TKI-resistant EGFR-mutant NSCLC group (Figure 1) [128]. In the OptiTROP-Lung01 study, SKB264 was combined with KL-A167, an anti-PD-L1 agent, for the treatment of advanced-stage NSCLC as first-line therapy. This trial showed an ORR of 77.6% and a 6-month mPFS rate of 84.6% (Figure 1) [129]. According to the trial protocol, asymptomatic patients with clinically inactive or previously treated BM were eligible for the study, but subset analyses of these patients have yet to be published (Table 2) [128,129].

7. MET Antibody–Drug Conjugates

MET is a well-described proto-oncogene receptor tyrosine kinase [130]. MET plays a significant role in tumor proliferation, angiogenesis, invasion, and cell survival [131]. In breast cancer, MET has been implicated in BM biology through the tumor microenvironment [42,132]. In NSCLC, multiple mechanisms of MET dysregulation have been described, including ex14mut, amplification, and overexpression.
Amplifications of MET have been described as an adaptive resistance mechanism in EGFR-mutated NSCLC treated with EGFR-TKIs [102,133]. MET amplification in NSCLC has been associated with early development of metastasis, including BM [134]. In a recent study evaluating the genomics of NSCLC BM, the authors observed a significantly increased MET amplification frequency of 4.4% in NSCLC BM compared to 2.3% in unmatched NSCLC primary tumors [135]. In a study by Preusser et al. (2014), the investigators observed a MET amplification frequency of up to 21.6% in resected NSCLC BM samples, but no matched nor unmatched primary tumor controls were analyzed [41].
MET ex14mut represents a targetable oncogenic mutation with approved therapeutics in NSCLC, such as capmatinib. A recent meta-analysis demonstrated a median incidence of 15.0% of MET ex14mut in NSCLC patients that have BM at the time of diagnosis [136]. However, a retrospective study found a significantly lower frequency of MET ex14mut in resected NSCLC BMs when compared to unmatched resected NSCLC primary tumors (1.0% versus 2.3%, respectively) [135].
In NSCLC, MET protein overexpression has been estimated to be 13.7%–25.0% [137,138,139]. In NSCLC BM, the frequency of MET protein overexpression has been identified in 44.4% of resected specimens [41].
Given the high expression levels of MET in NSCLC, including in BM, whether via amplification, oncogenic mutation, or protein overexpression, MET represents a promising therapeutic target for ADC development.

Telisotuzumab Vedotin

Telisotuzumab vedotin (Teliso-V) is an ADC with a DAR of 3:1 comprising of ABT-700, a humanized monoclonal anti-MET antibody, conjugated to monomethylauristatin E, a cytotoxic microtubule inhibitor, through a valine-citrulline linker that is cleavable by intracellular proteolysis (Figure 1). Teliso-V is notable for its in vitro antitumor activity against MET-overexpressing tumor cells with or without MET amplification [140]. The phase II LUMINOSITY trial evaluated Teliso-V in advanced-stage NSCLC patients with MET overexpression. Of the NSCLC patients included in the study, 33 out of 161 (20.5%) had previously treated and stable BM. The trial demonstrated an ORR of 28.6%, an mPFS of 5.7 months, and an mOS of 14.5 months in overall NSCLC patients (Figure 1). No subgroup analysis was presented for NSCLC BM patients, however [141].
The phase II LUNG-MAP S1400K trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of Teliso-V in advanced-stage squamous cell lung cancer patients with MET overexpression. Of the patients included in the trial, 2 out 23 (8.7%) had stable BM. The trial was terminated with an ORR of 9.0%, an mPFS of 2.4 months, and an mOS of 5.6 months [142].
The TeliMET NSCLC-1 phase III trial, which will compare Teliso-V monotherapy versus docetaxel in advanced-stage non-squamous NSCLC patients with MET overexpression, is currently underway (Table 2). Similar to the LUMINOSITY and LUNG-MAP S1440K trials, the TeliMET NSCLC-1 trial will include NSCLC patients with stable BMs.

8. Conclusions and Future Directions

In recent years, ADCs have become an important component of the treatment armamentarium for NSCLC, particularly in patients with HER2-mutated tumors with TDXd [89,91,92]. Meanwhile, other ADCs in development, consisting of a variety of novel molecular targets, linkers, and payloads, may soon become part of the standard of care upon further investigation. CNS metastases represent an important bottleneck limiting the improvement of survival outcomes in patients with metastatic NSCLC, creating impetus for the development of agents for patients specifically with CNS disease [143]. Third-generation EGFR inhibitors represent a class of therapeutics developed with CNS activity in mind, demonstrating impressive activity in both BM and LM [16,144,145,146]. However, EGFR mutations are only present in approximately 30% of patients with NSCLC, leaving the majority of NSCLC BM patients without therapies specifically designed for their disease site [147].
CNS metastases are unique due to a lack of activity of conventional chemotherapies in this setting. The reasons for this are believed to be multifaceted, with the BBB playing an important role in limiting drug penetration and rapidly removing a drug that enters the CNS via efflux transporters [11]. Despite the fact that, dogmatically, small molecules such as TKIs more readily penetrate CNS lesions than bulkier molecules such as antibodies, ADCs have elicited robust activity in proof-of-concept studies, such as in the TUXEDO-1 and DESTINY-Breast12 trials with TDXd in breast cancer BM [58,63].
There are several speculative hypotheses to explain why TDXd seemingly demonstrates similar outcomes in intracranial versus extracranial lesions in these studies, which may be translated to NSCLC, with future study. It is possible that, with the long circulating half-life of TDXd, DXd is slowly cleaved from the antibody, establishing a slowly released reservoir of drug able to cross the BBB and penetrate CNS lesions. It is also possible that the increased presence of HER2 dimer partners, such as HER3, or ligands in the brain microenvironment, such as neuregulin, may lead to increased HER2 internalization, favoring TDXd activity in the CNS despite it likely being present at lower concentrations compared to the systemic circulation [88]. The ongoing ELPIS study evaluating untreated, and asymptomatic BM in advanced NSCLC and breast cancer will further describe the activity of TDXd for solid tumor BM, but there is an impetus for additional studies that include patients with active BM and LM (Table 2). The lack of CNS-specific studies will continue to make strong claims about the activity of any ADC in the CNS of NSCLC patients challenging.
Beyond TDXd, it remains to be seen whether other ADCs will similarly demonstrate robust activity in CNS lesions. HER3-DXd represents a target that may similarly lead to augmented intracranial activity because of the well-established upregulation of HER3 in BM. The ongoing TUXEDO-3 study of HER3-DXd in NSCLC BM and LM will shed light as to whether this hypothesis holds true (Table 2).
There is a rapidly expanding number of ADCs that are currently under investigation for NSCLC. A list of currently ongoing prospective studies is listed in Table 2. Most of these studies exclude patients with progressive and untreated BMs, with some including stable BMs in their eligibility criteria.
Together, ADCs represent an expanding component of the therapeutic toolkit used to treat NSCLC. With further development, there is hope that these agents can be optimized to the benefit of patients with CNS metastases, who are, given their guarded prognoses, most in need of new and effective therapeutic strategies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.J.H.B., S.F.C., A.-M.L. and M.D.; writing—original draft preparation, D.J.H.B., S.F.C., A.-M.L. and M.D.; writing—review and editing, D.J.H.B., S.F.C., A.-M.L., N.B. and M.D.; supervision, M.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors kindly thank Victor Cohen for the assistance with the development of the initial topic of this review article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Canadian Cancer Society. Cancer Statistics at a Glance. Cancer Statistics. 2024. Available online: https://cancer.ca/en/research/cancer-statistics/cancer-statistics-at-a-glance (accessed on 1 September 2024).
  2. Bray, F.; Laversanne, M.; Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA A Cancer J. Clin. 2024, 74, 229–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Li, A.Y.; Gaebe, K.; Zulfiqar, A.; Lee, G.; Jerzak, K.J.; Sahgal, A.; Habbous, S.; Erickson, A.W.; Das, S. Association of Brain Metastases with Survival in Patients with Limited or Stable Extracranial Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw. Open 2023, 6, e230475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Goldberg, S.B.; Contessa, J.N.; Omay, S.B.; Chiang, V. Lung Cancer Brain Metastases. Cancer J. 2015, 21, 398–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Gillespie, C.S.; Mustafa, M.A.; Richardson, G.E.; Alam, A.M.; Lee, K.S.; Hughes, D.M.; Escriu, C.; Zakaria, R. Genomic Alterations and the Incidence of Brain Metastases in Advanced and Metastatic NSCLC: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2023, 18, 1703–1713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dankner, M.; Lam, S.; Degenhard, T.; Garzia, L.; Guiot, M.C.; Petrecca, K.; Siegel, P.M. The Underlying Biology and Therapeutic Vulnerabilities of Leptomeningeal Metastases in Adult Solid Cancers. Cancers 2021, 13, 732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fecci, P.E.; Champion, C.D.; Hoj, J.; McKernan, C.M.; Goodwin, C.R.; Kirkpatrick, J.P.; Anders, C.K.; Pendergast, A.M.; Sampson, J.H. The Evolving Modern Management of Brain Metastasis. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2019, 25, 6570–6580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Suh, J.H.; Kotecha, R.; Chao, S.T.; Ahluwalia, M.S.; Sahgal, A.; Chang, E.L. Current approaches to the management of brain metastases. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2020, 17, 279–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Vogelbaum, M.A.; Brown, P.D.; Messersmith, H.; Brastianos, P.K.; Burri, S.; Cahill, D.; Dunn, I.F.; Gaspar, L.E.; Gatson, N.T.N.; Gondi, V.; et al. Treatment for Brain Metastases: ASCO-SNO-ASTRO Guideline. J. Clin. Oncol. 2021, 40, 492–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Arvanitis, C.D.; Ferraro, G.B.; Jain, R.K. The blood–brain barrier and blood–tumour barrier in brain tumours and metastases. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2020, 20, 26–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Golden, P.L.; Pollack, G.M. Blood-Brain Barrier Efflux Transport. J. Pharm. Sci. 2003, 92, 1739–1753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ramalingam, S.S.; Vansteenkiste, J.; Planchard, D.; Cho, B.C.; Gray, J.E.; Ohe, Y.; Zhou, C.; Reungwetwattana, T.; Cheng, Y.; Chewaskulyong, B.; et al. Overall Survival with Osimertinib in Untreated, EGFR-Mutated Advanced NSCLC. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 382, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Shaw, A.T.; Kim, T.M.; Crinò, L.; Gridelli, C.; Kiura, K.; Liu, G.; Novello, S.; Bearz, A.; Gautschi, O.; Mok, T.; et al. Ceritinib versus chemotherapy in patients with ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer previously given chemotherapy and crizotinib (ASCEND-5): A randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017, 18, 874–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Camidge, D.R.; Kim, H.R.; Ahn, M.J.; Yang, J.C.H.; Han, J.Y.; Hochmair, M.J.; Lee, K.H.; Delmonte, A.; Garcia Campelo, M.R.; Kim, D.W.; et al. Brigatinib Versus Crizotinib in ALK Inhibitor-Naive Advanced ALK-Positive NSCLC: Final Results of Phase 3 ALTA-1L Trial. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2021, 16, 2091–2108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Solomon, B.J.; Liu, G.; Felip, E.; Mok, T.S.K.; Soo, R.A.; Mazieres, J.; Shaw, A.T.; de Marinis, F.; Goto, Y.; Wu, Y.L.; et al. Lorlatinib Versus Crizotinib in Patients with Advanced ALK-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: 5-Year Outcomes From the Phase III CROWN Study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2024, 42, 3400–3409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bian, D.J.H.; Lazaratos, A.-M.; Maritan, S.M.; Quaiattini, A.; Zeng, Z.; Zhu, Z.; Sener, U.; Malani, R.; Kim, Y.J.; Ichihara, E.; et al. Osimertinib is associated with improved outcomes in pre-treated non-small cell lung cancer leptomeningeal metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Heliyon 2024, 10, e29668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Dziadziuszko, R.; Krebs, M.G.; Braud, F.D.; Siena, S.; Drilon, A.; Doebele, R.C.; Patel, M.R.; Cho, B.C.; Liu, S.V.; Ahn, M.-J.; et al. Updated Integrated Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Entrectinib in Locally Advanced or Metastatic ROS1 Fusion–Positive Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2021, 39, 1253–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shaw, A.T.; Solomon, B.J.; Chiari, R.; Riely, G.J.; Besse, B.; Soo, R.A.; Kao, S.; Lin, C.-C.; Bauer, T.M.; Clancy, J.S.; et al. Lorlatinib in advanced ROS1-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: A multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 1-2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019, 20, 1691–1701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Garon, E.B.; Heist, R.S.; Seto, T.; Han, J.-Y.; Reguart, N.; Groen, H.J.; Tan, D.S.; Hida, T.; de Jonge, M.J.; Orlov, S.V.; et al. Abstract CT082: Capmatinib in METex14-mutated (mut) advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Results from the phase II GEOMETRY mono-1 study, including efficacy in patients (pts) with brain metastases (BM). Cancer Res. 2020, 80 (Suppl. S16), CT082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Paik, P.K.; Felip, E.; Veillon, R.; Sakai, H.; Cortot, A.B.; Garassino, M.C.; Mazieres, J.; Viteri, S.; Senellart, H.; Meerbeeck, J.V.; et al. Tepotinib in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with MET Exon 14 Skipping Mutations. New Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, 931–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Subbiah, V.; Gainor, J.F.; Oxnard, G.R.; Tan, D.S.W.; Owen, D.H.; Cho, B.C.; Loong, H.H.; McCoach, C.E.; Weiss, J.; Kim, Y.J.; et al. Intracranial Efficacy of Selpercatinib in RET Fusion-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers on the LIBRETTO-001 Trial. Clin. Cancer Res. 2021, 27, 4160–4167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yamamoto, G.; Sakakibara-Konishi, J.; Ikari, T.; Kitai, H.; Mizugaki, H.; Asahina, H.; Kikuchi, E.; Shinagawa, N. Response of BRAFV600E-Mutant Lung Adenocarcinoma with Brain Metastasis and Leptomeningeal Dissemination to Dabrafenib Plus Trametinib Treatment. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2019, 14, e97–e99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Dingemans, A.-M.C.; Syrigos, K.; Livi, L.; Paulus, A.; Kim, S.-W.; Chen, Y.; Felip, E.; Griesinger, F.; Ohashi, K.; Zalcman, G.; et al. Intracranial efficacy of sotorasib versus docetaxel in pretreated KRAS G12C-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Practice-informing data from a global, phase 3, randomized, controlled trial (RCT). J. Clin. Oncol. 2023, 41 (Suppl. S17), LBA9016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Doebele, R.; Paz-Ares, L.; Farago, A.F.; Liu, S.V.; Chawla, S.P.; Tosi, D.; Blakely, C.M.; Krauss, J.C.; Sigal, D.; Bazhenova, L.; et al. Abstract CT131: Entrectinib in NTRK-fusion positive (NTRK-FP) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Integrated analysis of patients enrolled in three trials (STARTRK-2, STARTRK-1 and ALKA-372-001). Cancer Res. 2019, 79 (Suppl. S13), CT131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Drilon, A.E.; DuBois, S.G.; Farago, A.F.; Geoerger, B.; Grilley-Olson, J.E.; Hong, D.S.; Sohal, D.; Tilburg, C.M.v.; Ziegler, D.S.; Ku, N.; et al. Activity of larotrectinib in TRK fusion cancer patients with brain metastases or primary central nervous system tumors. J. Clin. Oncol. 2019, 37 (Suppl. S15), 2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Schapira, E.; Hubbeling, H.; Yeap, B.Y.; Mehan, W.A., Jr.; Shaw, A.T.; Oh, K.; Gainor, J.F.; Shih, H.A. Improved Overall Survival and Locoregional Disease Control with Concurrent PD-1 Pathway Inhibitors and Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Lung Cancer Patients with Brain Metastases. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2018, 101, 624–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Taggart, D.; Andreou, T.; Scott, K.J.; Williams, J.; Rippaus, N.; Brownlie, R.J.; Ilett, E.J.; Salmond, R.J.; Melcher, A.; Lorger, M. Anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA-4 efficacy in melanoma brain metastases depends on extracranial disease and augmentation of CD8(+) T cell trafficking. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, E1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Coleman, N.; Yap, T.A.; Heymach, J.V.; Meric-Bernstam, F.; Le, X. Antibody-drug conjugates in lung cancer: Dawn of a new era? npj Precis. Oncol. 2023, 7, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mair, M.J.; Bartsch, R.; Le Rhun, E.; Berghoff, A.S.; Brastianos, P.K.; Cortes, J.; Gan, H.K.; Lin, N.U.; Lassman, A.B.; Wen, P.Y.; et al. Understanding the activity of antibody–drug conjugates in primary and secondary brain tumours. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2023, 20, 372–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Flynn, P.; Suryaprakash, S.; Grossman, D.; Panier, V.; Wu, J. The antibody-drug conjugate landscape. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2024, 23, 577–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. De Cecco, M.; Galbraith, D.N.; McDermott, L.L. What makes a good antibody-drug conjugate? Expert. Opin. Biol. Ther. 2021, 21, 841–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Fu, Z.; Li, S.; Han, S.; Shi, C.; Zhang, Y. Antibody drug conjugate: The “biological missile” for targeted cancer therapy. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2022, 7, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Drago, J.Z.; Modi, S.; Chandarlapaty, S. Unlocking the potential of antibody–drug conjugates for cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2021, 18, 327–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhou, L.; Lu, Y.; Liu, W.; Wang, S.; Wang, L.; Zheng, P.; Zi, G.; Liu, H.; Liu, W.; Wei, S. Drug conjugates for the treatment of lung cancer: From drug discovery to clinical practice. Exp. Hematol. Oncol. 2024, 13, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Saunus, J.M.; Quinn, M.C.; Patch, A.-M.; Pearson, J.V.; Bailey, P.J.; Nones, K.; McCart Reed, A.E.; Miller, D.; Wilson, P.J.; Al-Ejeh, F.; et al. Integrated genomic and transcriptomic analysis of human brain metastases identifies alterations of potential clinical significance. J. Pathol. 2015, 237, 363–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Da Silva, L.; Simpson, P.T.; Smart, C.E.; Cocciardi, S.; Waddell, N.; Lane, A.; Morrison, B.J.; Vargas, A.C.; Healey, S.; Beesley, J.; et al. HER3 and downstream pathways are involved in colonization of brain metastases from breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2010, 12, R46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Berghoff, A.S.; Bartsch, R.; Preusser, M.; Ricken, G.; Steger, G.G.; Bago-Horvath, Z.; Rudas, M.; Streubel, B.; Dubsky, P.; Gnant, M.; et al. Co-overexpression of HER2/HER3 is a predictor of impaired survival in breast cancer patients. Breast 2014, 23, 637–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Berghoff, A.S.; Magerle, M.; Ilhan-Mutlu, A.; Dinhof, C.; Widhalm, G.; Dieckman, K.; Marosi, C.; Wöhrer, A.; Hackl, M.; Zöchbauer-Müller, S.; et al. Frequent overexpression of ErbB—Receptor family members in brain metastases of non-small cell lung cancer patients. APMIS 2013, 121, 1144–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kodack, D.P.; Askoxylakis, V.; Ferraro, G.B.; Sheng, Q.; Badeaux, M.; Goel, S.; Qi, X.; Shankaraiah, R.; Cao, Z.A.; Ramjiawan, R.R.; et al. The brain microenvironment mediates resistance in luminal breast cancer to PI3K inhibition through HER3 activation. Sci. Transl. Med. 2017, 9, eaal4682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Tomasich, E.; Steindl, A.; Paiato, C.; Hatziioannou, T.; Kleinberger, M.; Berchtold, L.; Puhr, R.; Hainfellner, J.A.; Müllauer, L.; Widhalm, G.; et al. Frequent Overexpression of HER3 in Brain Metastases from Breast and Lung Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2023, 29, 3225–3236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Preusser, M.; Streubel, B.; Berghoff, A.S.; Hainfellner, J.A.; von Deimling, A.; Widhalm, G.; Dieckmann, K.; Wöhrer, A.; Hackl, M.; Zielinski, C.; et al. Amplification and overexpression of is a common event in brain metastases of non-small cell lung cancer. Histopathology 2014, 65, 684–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Xing, F.; Liu, Y.; Wu, S.-Y.; Wu, K.; Sharma, S.; Mo, Y.-Y.; Feng, J.; Sanders, S.; Jin, G.; Singh, R.; et al. Loss of XIST in Breast Cancer Activates MSN-c-Met and Reprograms Microglia via Exosomal miRNA to Promote Brain Metastasis. Cancer Res. 2018, 78, 4316–4330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Liu, Y.; Smith, M.R.; Wang, Y.; D’Agostino, R.; Ruiz, J.; Lycan, T.; Kucera, G.L.; Miller, L.D.; Li, W.; Chan, M.D.; et al. c-Met Mediated Cytokine Network Promotes Brain Metastasis of Breast Cancer by Remodeling Neutrophil Activities. Cancers 2023, 15, 2626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Lee, S.J.; Seol, H.J.; Lee, H.W.; Kang, W.Y.; Kang, B.G.; Jin, J.; Jo, M.-Y.; Jin, Y.; Lee, J.-I.; Joo, K.M.; et al. Gene silencing of c-Met leads to brain metastasis inhibitory effects. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 2013, 30, 845–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Tsuchikama, K.; An, Z. Antibody-drug conjugates: Recent advances in conjugation and linker chemistries. Protein Cell 2016, 9, 33–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bargh, J.D.; Isidro-Llobet, A.; Parker, J.S.; Spring, D.R. Cleavable linkers in antibody–drug conjugates. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 4361–4374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Nolting, B. Linker Technologies for Antibody–Drug Conjugates. In Antibody-Drug Conjugates; Ducry, L., Ed.; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2013; pp. 71–100. [Google Scholar]
  48. Oflazoglu, E.; Stone, I.J.; Gordon, K.; Wood, C.G.; Repasky, E.A.; Grewal, I.S.; Law, C.-L.; Gerber, H.-P. Potent Anticarcinoma Activity of the Humanized Anti-CD70 Antibody h1F6 Conjugated to the Tubulin Inhibitor Auristatin via an Uncleavable Linker. Clin. Cancer Res. 2008, 14, 6171–6180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Baah, S.; Laws, M.; Rahman, K.M. Antibody–Drug Conjugates—A Tutorial Review. Molecules 2021, 26, 2943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ogitani, Y.; Hagihara, K.; Oitate, M.; Naito, H.; Agatsuma, T. Bystander killing effect of DS-8201a, a novel anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 antibody–drug conjugate, in tumors with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 heterogeneity. Cancer Sci. 2016, 107, 1039–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mckertish, C.M.; Kayser, V. Advances and Limitations of Antibody Drug Conjugates for Cancer. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Nagayama, A.; Ellisen, L.W.; Chabner, B.; Bardia, A. Antibody–Drug Conjugates for the Treatment of Solid Tumors: Clinical Experience and Latest Developments. Target. Oncol. 2017, 12, 719–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hamblett, K.J.; Senter, P.D.; Chace, D.F.; Sun, M.M.C.; Lenox, J.; Cerveny, C.G.; Kissler, K.M.; Bernhardt, S.X.; Kopcha, A.K.; Zabinski, R.F.; et al. Effects of Drug Loading on the Antitumor Activity of a Monoclonal Antibody Drug Conjugate. Clin. Cancer Res. 2004, 10, 7063–7070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Sau, S.; Alsaab, H.O.; Kashaw, S.K.; Tatiparti, K.; Iyer, A.K. Advances in antibody–drug conjugates: A new era of targeted cancer therapy. Drug Discov. Today 2017, 22, 1547–1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Ackerman, S.E.; Pearson, C.I.; Gregorio, J.D.; Gonzalez, J.C.; Kenkel, J.A.; Hartmann, F.J.; Luo, A.; Ho, P.Y.; LeBlanc, H.; Blum, L.K.; et al. Immune-stimulating antibody conjugates elicit robust myeloid activation and durable antitumor immunity. Nat. Cancer 2021, 2, 18–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Dumontet, C.; Reichert, J.M.; Senter, P.D.; Lambert, J.M.; Beck, A. Antibody–drug conjugates come of age in oncology. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2023, 22, 641–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Gogia, P.; Ashraf, H.; Bhasin, S.; Xu, Y. Antibody–Drug Conjugates: A Review of Approved Drugs and Their Clinical Level of Evidence. Cancers 2023, 15, 3886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Bartsch, R.; Berghoff, A.S.; Furtner, J.; Marhold, M.; Bergen, E.S.; Roider-Schur, S.; Mair, M.J.; Starzer, A.M.; Forstner, H.; Rottenmanner, B.; et al. Final outcome analysis from the phase II Tuxedo-1 Trial of Trastuzumab-Deruxtecan in HER2-positive breast cancer patients with active brain metastases. Neuro-Oncol. 2024, noae123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Bartsch, R.; Batista, M.V.; Berghoff, A.S.; Furtner, J.; Marhold, M.; Oberndorfer, F.; Garde, J.; Ruiz-Borrego, M.; Greil, R.; Raimondi, G.; et al. Patritumab deruxtecan (HER3-DXd) in active brain metastases from metastatic breast and non-small cell lung cancers, and leptomeningeal disease from advanced solid tumors: The TUXEDO-3 phase II trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2024, 42 (Suppl. S16), TPS2091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Bartsch, R.; Berghoff, A.S.; Furtner, J.; Marhold, M.; Bergen, E.S.; Roider-Schur, S.; Starzer, A.M.; Forstner, H.; Rottenmanner, B.; Dieckmann, K.; et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan in HER2-positive breast cancer with brain metastases: A single-arm, phase 2 trial. Nat. Med. 2022, 28, 1840–1847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Pérez-García, J.M.; Vaz Batista, M.; Cortez, P.; Ruiz-Borrego, M.; Cejalvo, J.M.; de la Haba-Rodriguez, J.; Garrigós, L.; Racca, F.; Servitja, S.; Blanch, S.; et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with central nervous system involvement from HER2-positive breast cancer: The DEBBRAH trial. Neuro-Oncol. 2022, 25, 157–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Vaz Batista, M.; Pérez-García, J.M.; Garrigós, L.; García-Sáenz, J.Á.; Cortez, P.; Racca, F.; Blanch, S.; Ruiz-Borrego, M.; Fernández-Ortega, A.; Fernández-Abad, M.; et al. The DEBBRAH trial: Trastuzumab deruxtecan in HER2-positive and HER2-low breast cancer patients with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. Med. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Harbeck, N.; Ciruelos, E.; Jerusalem, G.; Müller, V.; Niikura, N.; Viale, G.; Bartsch, R.; Kurzeder, C.; Higgins, M.J.; Connolly, R.M.; et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan in HER2-positive advanced breast cancer with or without brain metastases: A phase 3b/4 trial. Nat. Med. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Moasser, M.M. The oncogene HER2: Its signaling and transforming functions and its role in human cancer pathogenesis. Oncogene 2007, 26, 6469–6487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Li, B.T.; Ross, D.S.; Aisner, D.L.; Chaft, J.E.; Hsu, M.; Kako, S.L.; Kris, M.G.; Varella-Garcia, M.; Arcila, M.E. HER2 Amplification and HER2 Mutation Are Distinct Molecular Targets in Lung Cancers. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2016, 11, 414–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Ren, S.; Wang, J.; Ying, J.; Mitsudomi, T.; Lee, D.H.; Wang, Z.; Chu, Q.; Mack, P.C.; Cheng, Y.; Duan, J.; et al. Consensus for HER2 alterations testing in non-small-cell lung cancer. ESMO Open 2022, 7, 100395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Mazières, J.; Peters, S.; Lepage, B.; Cortot, A.B.; Barlesi, F.; Beau-Faller, M.; Besse, B.; Blons, H.; Mansuet-Lupo, A.; Urban, T.; et al. Lung Cancer That Harbors an HER2 Mutation: Epidemiologic Characteristics and Therapeutic Perspectives. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013, 31, 1997–2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Pillai, R.N.; Behera, M.; Berry, L.D.; Rossi, M.R.; Kris, M.G.; Johnson, B.E.; Bunn, P.A.; Ramalingam, S.S.; Khuri, F.R. HER2 mutations in lung adenocarcinomas: A report from the Lung Cancer Mutation Consortium. Cancer 2017, 123, 4099–4105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ahn, B.C.; Han, Y.J.; Kim, H.R.; Hong, M.H.; Cho, B.C.; Lim, S.M. Real World Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of HER2-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Detected by Next-Generation Sequencing. Cancer Res. Treat. 2023, 55, 488–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Bu, S.; Wang, R.; Pan, Y.; Yu, S.; Shen, X.; Li, Y.; Sun, Y.; Chen, H. Clinicopathologic Characteristics of Patients with HER2 Insertions in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2017, 24, 291–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zhuo, X.; Guo, H.; Ma, J.; Lai, J.; Liu, L.; Yin, K.; Zhao, J.; Wang, J.; Jiang, F.; Xu, W.; et al. Clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of patients with non-small cell lung cancer having HER2 alterations. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2023, 149, 2029–2039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Li, X.; Zhao, C.; Su, C.; Ren, S.; Chen, X.; Zhou, C. Epidemiological study of HER-2 mutations among EGFR wild-type lung adenocarcinoma patients in China. BMC Cancer 2016, 16, 828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Kim, E.K.; Kim, K.A.; Lee, C.Y.; Shim, H.S. The frequency and clinical impact of HER2 alterations in lung adenocarcinoma. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0171280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Offin, M.; Feldman, D.; Ni, A.; Myers, M.L.; Lai, W.V.; Pentsova, E.; Boire, A.; Daras, M.; Jordan, E.J.; Solit, D.B.; et al. Frequency and outcomes of brain metastases in patients with HER2-mutant lung cancers. Cancer 2019, 125, 4380–4387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Yang, S.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, C.; Li, X.; Liu, Q.; Mao, S.; Liu, Y.; Yu, X.; Wang, W.; Tian, Q.; et al. Exon 20 YVMA insertion is associated with high incidence of brain metastasis and inferior outcome of chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with HER2 kinase domain mutations. Transl. Lung Cancer Res. 2021, 10, 753–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Pellegrini, C.; Falleni, M.; Marchetti, A.; Cassani, B.; Miozzo, M.; Buttitta, F.; Roncalli, M.; Coggi, G.; Bosari, S. HER-2/Neu Alterations in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Comprehensive Evaluation by Real Time Reverse Transcription-PCR, Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization, and Immunohistochemistry1. Clin. Cancer Res. 2003, 9, 3645–3652. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  77. Heinmöller, P.; Gross, C.; Beyser, K.; Schmidtgen, C.; Maass, G.; Pedrocchi, M.; Rüschoff, J. HER2 status in non-small cell lung cancer: Results from patient screening for enrollment to a phase II study of herceptin. Clin. Cancer Res. 2003, 9, 5238–5243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Lee, K.; Jung, H.A.; Sun, J.M.; Lee, S.H.; Ahn, J.S.; Park, K.; Ahn, M.J. Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with HER2 Alterations in Korea. Cancer Res. Treat. 2020, 52, 292–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Lewis Phillips, G.D.; Li, G.; Dugger, D.L.; Crocker, L.M.; Parsons, K.L.; Mai, E.; Blättler, W.A.; Lambert, J.M.; Chari, R.V.J.; Lutz, R.J.; et al. Targeting HER2-Positive Breast Cancer with Trastuzumab-DM1, an Antibody–Cytotoxic Drug Conjugate. Cancer Res. 2008, 68, 9280–9290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Verma, S.; Miles, D.; Gianni, L.; Krop, I.E.; Welslau, M.; Baselga, J.; Pegram, M.; Oh, D.Y.; Diéras, V.; Guardino, E.; et al. Trastuzumab emtansine for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 367, 1783–1791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Krop, I.E.; Kim, S.-B.; Martin, A.G.; LoRusso, P.M.; Ferrero, J.-M.; Badovinac-Crnjevic, T.; Hoersch, S.; Smitt, M.; Wildiers, H. Trastuzumab emtansine versus treatment of physician’s choice in patients with previously treated HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (TH3RESA): Final overall survival results from a randomised open-label phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017, 18, 743–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Hurvitz, S.A.; Kim, S.B.; Chung, W.P.; Im, S.A.; Park, Y.H.; Hegg, R.; Kim, M.H.; Tseng, L.M.; Petry, V.; Chung, C.F.; et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients with brain metastases from the randomized DESTINY-Breast03 trial. ESMO Open 2024, 9, 102924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Montemurro, F.; Delaloge, S.; Barrios, C.H.; Wuerstlein, R.; Anton, A.; Brain, E.; Hatschek, T.; Kelly, C.M.; Peña-Murillo, C.; Yilmaz, M.; et al. Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer and brain metastases: Exploratory final analysis of cohort 1 from KAMILLA, a single-arm phase IIIb clinical trial. Ann. Oncol. 2020, 31, 1350–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Iwama, E.; Zenke, Y.; Sugawara, S.; Daga, H.; Morise, M.; Yanagitani, N.; Sakamoto, T.; Murakami, H.; Kishimoto, J.; Matsumoto, S.; et al. Trastuzumab emtansine for patients with non–small cell lung cancer positive for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 exon-20 insertion mutations. Eur. J. Cancer 2022, 162, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Li, B.T.; Shen, R.; Buonocore, D.; Olah, Z.T.; Ni, A.; Ginsberg, M.S.; Ulaner, G.A.; Offin, M.; Feldman, D.; Hembrough, T.; et al. Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine for Patients with HER2-Mutant Lung Cancers: Results From a Phase II Basket Trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2018, 36, 2532–2537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Peters, S.; Stahel, R.; Bubendorf, L.; Bonomi, P.; Villegas, A.; Kowalski, D.M.; Baik, C.S.; Isla, D.; Carpeno, J.D.C.; Garrido, P.; et al. Trastuzumab Emtansine (T-DM1) in Patients with Previously Treated HER2-Overexpressing Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Efficacy, Safety, and Biomarkers. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 25, 64–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Hotta, K.; Aoe, K.; Kozuki, T.; Ohashi, K.; Ninomiya, K.; Ichihara, E.; Kubo, T.; Ninomiya, T.; Chikamori, K.; Harada, D.; et al. A Phase II Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in HER2-Positive Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2018, 13, 273–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Li, B.T.; Michelini, F.; Misale, S.; Cocco, E.; Baldino, L.; Cai, Y.; Shifman, S.; Tu, H.-Y.; Myers, M.L.; Xu, C.; et al. HER2-Mediated Internalization of Cytotoxic Agents in ERBB2 Amplified or Mutant Lung Cancers. Cancer Discov. 2020, 10, 674–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Li, B.T.; Smit, E.F.; Goto, Y.; Nakagawa, K.; Udagawa, H.; Mazières, J.; Nagasaka, M.; Bazhenova, L.; Saltos, A.N.; Felip, E.; et al. Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in HER2-Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. New Engl. J. Med. 2022, 386, 241–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Phillips, C. FDA Approves Trastuzumab Deruxtecan for Any HER2-Positive Solid Cancer. In Cancer Currents: An NCI Cancer Research Blog; National Cancer Institute: Bethesda, MA, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  91. Smit, E.F.; Felip, E.; Uprety, D.; Nagasaka, M.; Nakagawa, K.; Paz-Ares Rodríguez, L.; Pacheco, J.M.; Li, B.T.; Planchard, D.; Baik, C.; et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (DESTINY-Lung01): Primary results of the HER2-overexpressing cohorts from a single-arm, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2024, 25, 439–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Goto, K.; Goto, Y.; Kubo, T.; Ninomiya, K.; Kim, S.-W.; Planchard, D.; Ahn, M.-J.; Smit, E.F.; Langen, A.J.d.; Pérol, M.; et al. Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in Patients with HER2-Mutant Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Primary Results From the Randomized, Phase II DESTINY-Lung02 Trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2023, 41, 4852–4863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Yu, H.A.; Goto, Y.; Hayashi, H.; Felip, E.; Yang, J.C.-H.; Reck, M.; Yoh, K.; Lee, S.-H.; Paz-Ares, L.; Besse, B.; et al. HERTHENA-Lung01, a Phase II Trial of Patritumab Deruxtecan (HER3-DXd) in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor–Mutated Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer After Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy and Platinum-Based Chemotherapy. J. Clin. Oncol. 2023, 41, 5363–5375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Jänne, P.A.; Baik, C.; Su, W.-C.; Johnson, M.L.; Hayashi, H.; Nishio, M.; Kim, D.-W.; Koczywas, M.; Gold, K.A.; Steuer, C.E.; et al. Efficacy and Safety of Patritumab Deruxtecan (HER3-DXd) in EGFR Inhibitor–Resistant, EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer. Cancer Discov. 2022, 12, 74–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Ma, Y.; Huang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Zhao, S.; Xue, J.; Yang, Y.; Fang, W.; Guo, Y.; Han, Y.; Yang, K.; et al. BL-B01D1, a first-in-class EGFR–HER3 bispecific antibody–drug conjugate, in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumours: A first-in-human, open-label, multicentre, phase 1 study. Lancet Oncol. 2024, 25, 901–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Niikura, N.; Yamanaka, T.; Nomura, H.; Shiraishi, K.; Kusama, H.; Yamamoto, M.; Matsuura, K.; Inoue, K.; Takahara, S.; Kita, S.; et al. Treatment with trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer and brain metastases and/or leptomeningeal disease (ROSET-BM). npj Breast Cancer 2023, 9, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Lazaratos, A.-M.; Maritan, S.M.; Quaiattini, A.; Darlix, A.; Ratosa, I.; Ferraro, E.; Griguolo, G.; Guarneri, V.; Pellerino, A.; Hofer, S.; et al. Intrathecal trastuzumab versus alternate routes of delivery for HER2-targeted therapies in patients with HER2+ breast cancer leptomeningeal metastases. Breast 2023, 69, 451–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Wu, R.; Yuan, B.; Li, C.; Wang, Z.; Song, Y.; Liu, H. A narrative review of advances in treatment and survival prognosis of HER2-positive malignant lung cancers. J. Thorac. Dis. 2021, 13, 3708–3720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Li, Z.; Song, Z.; Hong, W.; Yang, N.; Wang, Y.; Jian, H.; Liang, Z.; Hu, S.; Peng, M.; Yu, Y.; et al. SHR-A1811 (antibody-drug conjugate) in advanced HER2-mutant non-small cell lung cancer: A multicenter, open-label, phase 1/2 study. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2024, 9, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Gandullo-Sánchez, L.; Ocaña, A.; Pandiella, A. HER3 in cancer: From the bench to the bedside. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2022, 41, 310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Roskoski, R. The ErbB/HER family of protein-tyrosine kinases and cancer. Pharmacol. Res. 2014, 79, 34–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Engelman, J.A.; Zejnullahu, K.; Mitsudomi, T.; Song, Y.; Hyland, C.; Park, J.O.; Lindeman, N.; Gale, C.-M.; Zhao, X.; Christensen, J.; et al. MET Amplification Leads to Gefitinib Resistance in Lung Cancer by Activating ERBB3 Signaling. Science 2007, 316, 1039–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Sun, M.; Behrens, C.; Feng, L.; Ozburn, N.; Tang, X.; Yin, G.; Komaki, R.; Varella-Garcia, M.; Hong, W.K.; Aldape, K.D.; et al. HER Family Receptor Abnormalities in Lung Cancer Brain Metastases and Corresponding Primary Tumors. Clin. Cancer Res. 2009, 15, 4829–4837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Scharpenseel, H.; Hanssen, A.; Loges, S.; Mohme, M.; Bernreuther, C.; Peine, S.; Lamszus, K.; Goy, Y.; Petersen, C.; Westphal, M.; et al. EGFR and HER3 expression in circulating tumor cells and tumor tissue from non-small cell lung cancer patients. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 7406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Hashimoto, Y.; Koyama, K.; Kamai, Y.; Hirotani, K.; Ogitani, Y.; Zembutsu, A.; Abe, M.; Kaneda, Y.; Maeda, N.; Shiose, Y.; et al. A Novel HER3-Targeting Antibody–Drug Conjugate, U3-1402, Exhibits Potent Therapeutic Efficacy through the Delivery of Cytotoxic Payload by Efficient Internalization. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 25, 7151–7161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Yu, H.A.; Baik, C.; Kim, D.W.; Johnson, M.L.; Hayashi, H.; Nishio, M.; Yang, J.C.H.; Su, W.C.; Gold, K.A.; Koczywas, M.; et al. Translational insights and overall survival in the U31402-A-U102 study of patritumab deruxtecan (HER3-DXd) in EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Ann. Oncol. 2024, 35, 437–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Krop, I.E.; Masuda, N.; Mukohara, T.; Takahashi, S.; Nakayama, T.; Inoue, K.; Iwata, H.; Yamamoto, Y.; Alvarez, R.H.; Toyama, T.; et al. Patritumab Deruxtecan (HER3-DXd), a Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 3–Directed Antibody-Drug Conjugate, in Patients with Previously Treated Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 3–Expressing Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Multicenter, Phase I/II Trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2023, 41, 5550–5560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Mok, T.; Jänne, P.A.; Nishio, M.; Novello, S.; Reck, M.; Steuer, C.; Wu, Y.-L.; Fougeray, R.; Fan, P.-D.; Meng, J.; et al. HERTHENA-Lung02: Phase III study of patritumab deruxtecan in advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC after a third-generation EGFR TKI. Future Oncol. 2024, 20, 969–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Odintsov, I.; Sholl, L.M. Prognostic and predictive biomarkers in non-small cell lung carcinoma. Pathology 2024, 56, 192–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Lenárt, S.; Lenárt, P.; Šmarda, J.; Remšík, J.; Souček, K.; Beneš, P. Trop2: Jack of All Trades, Master of None. Cancers 2020, 12, 3328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Li, Z.; Jiang, X.; Zhang, W. TROP2 overexpression promotes proliferation and invasion of lung adenocarcinoma cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016, 470, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Zheng, Z.; Dong, X.-J. Clinical value of serum trophoblast cell surface protein 2 (TROP2) antibody in non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Biomarkers 2016, 21, 739–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Jiang, A.; Gao, X.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, L.; Lu, H. Expression and clinical significance of the Trop-2 gene in advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma. Oncol. Lett. 2013, 6, 375–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Mito, R.; Matsubara, E.; Komohara, Y.; Shinchi, Y.; Sato, K.; Yoshii, D.; Ohnishi, K.; Fujiwara, Y.; Tomita, Y.; Ikeda, K.; et al. Clinical impact of TROP2 in non-small lung cancers and its correlation with abnormal p53 nuclear accumulation. Pathol. Int. 2020, 70, 287–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Inamura, K.; Yokouchi, Y.; Kobayashi, M.; Ninomiya, H.; Sakakibara, R.; Subat, S.; Nagano, H.; Nomura, K.; Okumura, S.; Shibutani, T.; et al. Association of tumor TROP2 expression with prognosis varies among lung cancer subtypes. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 28725–28735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Bessede, A.; Peyraud, F.; Besse, B.; Cousin, S.; Cabart, M.; Chomy, F.; Rey, C.; Lara, O.; Odin, O.; Nafia, I.; et al. TROP2 Is Associated with Primary Resistance to Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2024, 30, 779–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Hijazo-Pechero, S.; Alay Badosa, A.; Vilariño, N.; Brenes Castro, J.; Moliner, L.; Mosteiro, M.A.; Vidal, N.; Muñoz-Pinedo, C.; Bruna, J.; Nadal, E. 1419P TACSTD2 (Trop-2) constitutes a promising antibody-drug conjugate target for patients with non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases. Ann. Oncol. 2023, 34, S810–S811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Goldenberg, D.M.; Cardillo, T.M.; Govindan, S.V.; Rossi, E.A.; Sharkey, R.M. Trop-2 is a novel target for solid cancer therapy with sacituzumab govitecan (IMMU-132), an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC). Oncotarget 2015, 6, 22496–22512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Bardia, A.; Hurvitz, S.A.; Tolaney, S.M.; Loirat, D.; Punie, K.; Oliveira, M.; Brufsky, A.; Sardesai, S.D.; Kalinsky, K.; Zelnak, A.B.; et al. Sacituzumab Govitecan in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. New Engl. J. Med. 2021, 384, 1529–1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Bardia, A.; Rugo, H.S.; Tolaney, S.M.; Loirat, D.; Punie, K.; Oliveira, M.; Brufsky, A.; Kalinsky, K.; Cortés, J.; Shaughnessy, J.O.; et al. Final Results From the Randomized Phase III ASCENT Clinical Trial in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer and Association of Outcomes by Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 and Trophoblast Cell Surface Antigen 2 Expression. J. Clin. Oncol. 2024, 42, 1738–1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Paz-Ares, L.G.; Juan-Vidal, O.; Mountzios, G.S.; Felip, E.; Reinmuth, N.; Marinis, F.d.; Girard, N.; Patel, V.M.; Takahama, T.; Owen, S.P.; et al. Sacituzumab Govitecan Versus Docetaxel for Previously Treated Advanced or Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: The Randomized, Open-Label Phase III EVOKE-01 Study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2024, 42, 2860–2872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Balinda, H.U.; Kelly, W.J.; Kaklamani, V.G.; Lathrop, K.I.; Canola, M.M.; Ghamasaee, P.; Sareddy, G.R.; Michalek, J.; Gilbert, A.R.; Surapaneni, P.; et al. Sacituzumab Govitecan in patients with breast cancer brain metastases and recurrent glioblastoma: A phase 0 window-of-opportunity trial. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 6707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Okajima, D.; Yasuda, S.; Maejima, T.; Karibe, T.; Sakurai, K.; Aida, T.; Toki, T.; Yamaguchi, J.; Kitamura, M.; Kamei, R.; et al. Datopotamab Deruxtecan, a Novel TROP2-directed Antibody-drug Conjugate, Demonstrates Potent Antitumor Activity by Efficient Drug Delivery to Tumor Cells. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2021, 20, 2329–2340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Shimizu, T.; Sands, J.; Yoh, K.; Spira, A.; Garon, E.B.; Kitazono, S.; Johnson, M.L.; Meric-Bernstam, F.; Tolcher, A.W.; Yamamoto, N.; et al. First-in-Human, Phase I Dose-Escalation and Dose-Expansion Study of Trophoblast Cell-Surface Antigen 2-Directed Antibody-Drug Conjugate Datopotamab Deruxtecan in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: TROPION-PanTumor01. J. Clin. Oncol. 2023, 41, 4678–4687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Ahn, M.-J.; Tanaka, K.; Paz-Ares, L.; Cornelissen, R.; Girard, N.; Pons-Tostivint, E.; Vicente Baz, D.; Sugawara, S.; Cobo, M.; Pérol, M.; et al. Datopotamab Deruxtecan Versus Docetaxel for Previously Treated Advanced or Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: The Randomized, Open-Label Phase III TROPION-Lung01 Study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2024, JCO-24-01544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Levy, B.P.; Felip, E.; Reck, M.; Yang, J.C.; Cappuzzo, F.; Yoneshima, Y.; Zhou, C.; Rawat, S.; Xie, J.; Basak, P.; et al. TROPION-Lung08: Phase III study of datopotamab deruxtecan plus pembrolizumab as first-line therapy for advanced NSCLC. Future Oncol. 2023, 19, 1461–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Cheng, Y.; Yuan, X.; Tian, Q.; Huang, X.; Chen, Y.; Pu, Y.; Long, H.; Xu, M.; Ji, Y.; Xie, J.; et al. Preclinical profiles of SKB264, a novel anti-TROP2 antibody conjugated to topoisomerase inhibitor, demonstrated promising antitumor efficacy compared to IMMU-132. Front. Oncol. 2022, 12, 951589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Fang, W.; Cheng, Y.; Chen, Z.; Wang, W.; Yin, Y.; Li, Y.; Xu, H.; Li, X.; Wainberg, Z.A.; Yu, G.; et al. SKB264 (TROP2-ADC) for the treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC: Efficacy and safety data from a phase 2 study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2023, 41 (Suppl. S16), 9114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Fang, W.; Wang, Q.; Cheng, Y.; Luo, Y.; Qu, X.; Zhu, H.; Ding, Z.; Li, X.; Wu, L.; Wang, Y.; et al. Sacituzumab tirumotecan (SKB264/MK-2870) in combination with KL-A167 (anti-PD-L1) as first-line treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC from the phase II OptiTROP-Lung01 study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2024, 42 (Suppl. S16), 8502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Olivero, M.; Rizzo, M.; Madeddu, R.; Casadio, C.; Pennacchietti, S.; Nicotra, M.R.; Prat, M.; Maggi, G.; Arena, N.; Natali, P.G.; et al. Overexpression and activation of hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor in human non-small-cell lung carcinomas. Br. J. Cancer 1996, 74, 1862–1868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Birchmeier, C.; Birchmeier, W.; Gherardi, E.; Vande Woude, G.F. Met, metastasis, motility and more. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2003, 4, 915–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Xing, F.; Liu, Y.; Sharma, S.; Wu, K.; Chan, M.D.; Lo, H.-W.; Carpenter, R.L.; Metheny-Barlow, L.J.; Zhou, X.; Qasem, S.A.; et al. Activation of the c-Met Pathway Mobilizes an Inflammatory Network in the Brain Microenvironment to Promote Brain Metastasis of Breast Cancer. Cancer Res. 2016, 76, 4970–4980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Coleman, N.; Hong, L.; Zhang, J.; Heymach, J.; Hong, D.; Le, X. Beyond epidermal growth factor receptor: MET amplification as a general resistance driver to targeted therapy in oncogene-driven non-small-cell lung cancer. ESMO Open 2021, 6, 100319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Yang, M.; Mandal, E.; Liu, F.X.; O’Hara, R.M.; Lesher, B.; Sanborn, R.E. Non-small cell lung cancer with MET amplification: Review of epidemiology, associated disease characteristics, testing procedures, burden, and treatments. Front. Oncol. 2024, 13, 1241402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Huang, R.S.P.; Harries, L.; Decker, B.; Hiemenz, M.C.; Murugesan, K.; Creeden, J.; Tolba, K.; Stabile, L.P.; Ramkissoon, S.H.; Burns, T.F.; et al. Clinicopathologic and Genomic Landscape of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Brain Metastases. Oncologist 2022, 27, 839–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Mazieres, J.; Vioix, H.; Pfeiffer, B.M.; Campden, R.I.; Chen, Z.; Heeg, B.; Cortot, A.B. MET Exon 14 Skipping in NSCLC: A Systematic Literature Review of Epidemiology, Clinical Characteristics, and Outcomes. Clin. Lung Cancer 2023, 24, 483–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Park, S.; Choi, Y.L.; Sung, C.O.; An, J.; Seo, J.; Ahn, M.J.; Ahn, J.S.; Park, K.; Shin, Y.K.; Erkin, O.C.; et al. High MET copy number and MET overexpression: Poor outcome in non-small cell lung cancer patients. Histol. Histopathol. 2012, 27, 197–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Bubendorf, L.; Dafni, U.; Schöbel, M.; Finn, S.P.; Tischler, V.; Sejda, A.; Marchetti, A.; Thunnissen, E.; Verbeken, E.K.; Warth, A.; et al. Prevalence and clinical association of MET gene overexpression and amplification in patients with NSCLC: Results from the European Thoracic Oncology Platform (ETOP) Lungscape project. Lung Cancer 2017, 111, 143–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Bar, J.; Cai, M.H.; Choi, Y.C.; Baijal, S.; Zhao, W.; Liede, A.; Raskin, L.; Vasilopoulos, A.; Li, M.; Roberts-Rapp, L.; et al. 1397P Prevalence, molecular characterization, and prognosis of MET-overexpressing non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a real-world patient cohort. Ann. Oncol. 2023, 34, S799–S800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Wang, J.; Anderson, M.G.; Oleksijew, A.; Vaidya, K.S.; Boghaert, E.R.; Tucker, L.; Zhang, Q.; Han, E.K.; Palma, J.P.; Naumovski, L.; et al. ABBV-399, a c-Met Antibody–Drug Conjugate that Targets Both MET–Amplified and c-Met–Overexpressing Tumors, Irrespective of MET Pathway Dependence. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017, 23, 992–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Camidge, D.R.; Bar, J.; Horinouchi, H.; Goldman, J.; Moiseenko, F.; Filippova, E.; Cicin, I.; Ciuleanu, T.; Daaboul, N.; Liu, C.; et al. Telisotuzumab Vedotin Monotherapy in Patients with Previously Treated c-Met Protein–Overexpressing Advanced Nonsquamous EGFR-Wildtype Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Phase II LUMINOSITY Trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2024, 42, 3000–3011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Waqar, S.N.; Redman, M.W.; Arnold, S.M.; Hirsch, F.R.; Mack, P.C.; Schwartz, L.H.; Gandara, D.R.; Stinchcombe, T.E.; Leighl, N.B.; Ramalingam, S.S.; et al. A Phase II Study of Telisotuzumab Vedotin in Patients with c-MET-positive Stage IV or Recurrent Squamous Cell Lung Cancer (LUNG-MAP Sub-study S1400K, NCT03574753). Clin. Lung Cancer 2021, 22, 170–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Achrol, A.S.; Rennert, R.C.; Anders, C.; Soffietti, R.; Ahluwalia, M.S.; Nayak, L.; Peters, S.; Arvold, N.D.; Harsh, G.R.; Steeg, P.S.; et al. Brain metastases. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2019, 5, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Jänne, P.A.; Planchard, D.; Kobayashi, K.; Cheng, Y.; Lee, C.K.; Valdiviezo, N.; Laktionov, K.; Yang, T.-Y.; Yu, Y.; Kato, T.; et al. CNS Efficacy of Osimertinib with or Without Chemotherapy in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor–Mutated Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2024, 42, 808–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Peled, N.; Kian, W.; Inbar, E.; Goldstein, I.M.; Zemel, M.; Rotem, O.; Rozenblum, A.B.; Nechushtan, H.; Dudnik, E.; Levin, D.; et al. Osimertinib in advanced EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma with asymptomatic brain metastases: An open-label, 3-arm, phase II pilot study. Neuro-Oncol. Adv. 2021, 4, vdab188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Park, S.; Baldry, R.; Jung, H.A.; Sun, J.-M.; Lee, S.-H.; Ahn, J.S.; Kim, Y.J.; Lee, Y.; Kim, D.-W.; Kim, S.-W.; et al. Phase II Efficacy and Safety of 80 mg Osimertinib in Patients with Leptomeningeal Metastases Associated with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation–Positive Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer (BLOSSOM). J. Clin. Oncol. 2024, 42, 2747–2756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Zhang, Y.L.; Yuan, J.Q.; Wang, K.F.; Fu, X.H.; Han, X.R.; Threapleton, D.; Yang, Z.Y.; Mao, C.; Tang, J.L. The prevalence of EGFR mutation in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 78985–78993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Antibody–drug conjugates evaluated for non-small cell lung cancer. HER2-targeting antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) include trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), SHR-A1811, and trastuzumab deruxtecan (TDXd). TROP2-targeting ADCs include Sacituzumab govetican, datopotomab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd), and Sacituzumab tirumotecan. HER3-targeting ADCs include patritumab deruxtecan and the EGFR-HER3 bispecific ADC BL-B01D1. MET-targeting ADC includes Telisotuzumab vedotin. Outcomes for patients with non-small cell lung cancer are described. Abbreviations. ADC, antibody–drug conjugate; DAR, drug-to-antibody ratio; IgG, immunoglobulin G; mOS, median overall survival; mPFS median progression-free survival; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; ORR, overall response rate. Original figure made with Biorender©.
Figure 1. Antibody–drug conjugates evaluated for non-small cell lung cancer. HER2-targeting antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) include trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), SHR-A1811, and trastuzumab deruxtecan (TDXd). TROP2-targeting ADCs include Sacituzumab govetican, datopotomab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd), and Sacituzumab tirumotecan. HER3-targeting ADCs include patritumab deruxtecan and the EGFR-HER3 bispecific ADC BL-B01D1. MET-targeting ADC includes Telisotuzumab vedotin. Outcomes for patients with non-small cell lung cancer are described. Abbreviations. ADC, antibody–drug conjugate; DAR, drug-to-antibody ratio; IgG, immunoglobulin G; mOS, median overall survival; mPFS median progression-free survival; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; ORR, overall response rate. Original figure made with Biorender©.
Curroncol 31 00471 g001
Figure 2. Antibody–drug conjugates evaluated for non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases.Outcomes for patients with non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases are described. Abbreviations. ADC, antibody–drug conjugate; BM, brain metastasis; HR, hazard ratio; mOS, median overall survival; mPFS median progression-free survival; NE, not estimable; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; ORR, overall response rate. Original figure made with Biorender©.
Figure 2. Antibody–drug conjugates evaluated for non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases.Outcomes for patients with non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases are described. Abbreviations. ADC, antibody–drug conjugate; BM, brain metastasis; HR, hazard ratio; mOS, median overall survival; mPFS median progression-free survival; NE, not estimable; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; ORR, overall response rate. Original figure made with Biorender©.
Curroncol 31 00471 g002
Table 2. Summary of ongoing clinical trials evaluating antibody–drug conjugates in overall non-small cell lung cancer patients and central-nervous system–specific non-small cell lung cancer patients.
Table 2. Summary of ongoing clinical trials evaluating antibody–drug conjugates in overall non-small cell lung cancer patients and central-nervous system–specific non-small cell lung cancer patients.
TrialTrial TypeNational Clinical Trial Number (NCT)Patient PopulationAntibody–Drug ConjugateAntibody TargetPayload TypeCNS Metastasis EligibilityStatus
CNS-specific NSCLC studiesEfficacy and Safety of T-DXd in HER2-mutant Advanced Lung Cancer Patients with Asymptomatic Brain Metastases (ELPIS)Phase IINCT06250777Locally advanced and unresectable NSCLC with activating HER2 mutation and untreated asymptomatic BM at baselineTrastuzumab deruxtecanHER2Topoisomerase I inhibitorCNS metastasis-specific studyNot yet recruiting
HER3-DXd in Breast Cancer and NSCLC Brain Metastases and Solid Tumor Leptomeningeal Disease (TUXEDO-3)Phase IINCT05865990Previously treated metastatic NSCLC with newly diagnosed or progressive BMPatritumab deruxtecanHER3Topoisomerase I inhibitorCNS metastasis-specific studyRecruiting
Non-CNS-specific NSCLC studiesCAB-AXL-ADC Safety and Efficacy Study in Adults with NSCLCPhase IINCT04681131Metastatic NSCLCCAB-AXL-ADCAXLAuristatin microtubule inhibitorUncontrolled CNS disease excludedRecruiting
A Study of MORAb-202 in Participants with Previously Treated Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Adenocarcinoma (AC)Phase IINCT05577715Metastatic NSCLC with treatment-refractory progressive disease while on PD-1/L1-, EGFR-, or ALK- targeting therapiesMecbotamab vedotin, no dosing available; mecbotamab vedotin and a PD-1 inhibitorAXLAuristatin microtubule inhibitorNo mention of CNS disease in the eligibility criteriaRecruiting
A Study of BL-B01D1 and BL-B01D1 in Combination with Osimertinib Mesylate Tablets in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung CancerPhase IINCT05880706Locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic NSCLCBL-B01D1EGFRxHER3Topoisomerase I inhibitorActive CNS disease excludedRecruiting
Phase 2 Study to Investigate Luveltamab Tazevibulin in Adults with Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung CancerPhase IINCT06555263Locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic NSCLC with positive FOLR1 expression and treatment-refractory diseaseLuveltamab tazevibulinFOLR1Tubulin inhibitorPreviously treated BM included; untreated CNS disease excludedRecruiting
Study to Investigate Luveltamab Tazevibulin in Adults with Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung CancerPhase IINCT06555263Locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic NSCLC that is refractory to systemic therapy with positive FOLR1 expressionLuveltamab tazevibulinFOLR1Tubulin inhibitorUntreated CNS disease excludedRecruiting
Phase Ib Study of the Safety of T-DXd and Immunotherapy Agents with and Without Chemotherapy in Advanced or Metastatic HER2+, Non-squamous NSCLC (DL03)Phase INCT04686305Locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous NSCLC that are refractory to systemic therapy or treatment-naïve with HER2 overexpressionTrastuzumab deruxtecanHER2Topoisomerase I inhibitorUntreated an symptomatic CNS disease excludedRecruiting
A Clinical Trial of TQB2102 for Injection in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer with HER2 Gene AbnormalityPhase IINCT06496490Locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic NSCLC that is refractory to standard of care therapyTQB2102 HER2Topoisomerase I inhibitorStable BM included; symptomatic and progressive CNS disease, or LMD excludedRecruiting
HER3-DXd in Metastatic or Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung CancerPhase INCT03260491Locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic NSCLC with EGFR-activating mutations with progression on previously responsive EGFR-TKI treatmentPatritumab deruxtecanHER3Topoisomerase I inhibitorClinically inactive or treated and asymptomatic BM included; untreated and symptomatic CNS disease excludedRecruiting
HERTHENA-Lung02: A Study of Patritumab Deruxtecan Versus Platinum-based Chemotherapy in Metastatic or Locally Advanced EGFRm NSCLC After Failure of EGFR TKI TherapyPhase IIINCT05338970Locally advanced, or metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC with EGFR TKI treatment-refractory disease and EGFR mutationsPatritumab deruxtecanHER3Topoisomerase I inhibitorUntreated and symptomatic BM, and history or presence of LMD excludedActive, not recruiting
A Study of SGN-B6A Versus Docetaxel in Previously Treated Non-small Cell Lung CancerPhase IIINCT06012435Locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic NSCLC with non-squamous histology and with progression on previous chemotherapy or targeted therapySigvotatug vedotinIB6Auristatin microtubule inhibitorStable and treated BM included; active CNS disease and LMD excludedRecruiting
Clinical Study of Antibody-Drug Conjugate MYTX-011 in Subjects with Non-Small Cell Lung CancerPhase INCT05652868Locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic NSCLC with MET alterations that is refractory to the standard of care therapyMYTX-011METAuristatin microtubule inhibitorUncontrolled and untreated CNS disease excludedRecruiting
A Study to Assess Disease Activity and Adverse Events of Intravenous (IV) Telisotuzumab Vedotin Compared to IV Docetaxel in Adult Participants with Previously Treated Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)Phase IIINCT04928846Locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC with treatment-refractory disease and MET overexpressionTelisotuzumab VedotinMETMicrotubule inhibitorStable CNS disease included; new and untreated CNS disease, and LMD excludedRecruiting
Study of REGN5093-M114 (METxMET Antibody-Drug Conjugate) in Adult Patients with Mesenchymal Epithelial Transition Factor (MET) Overexpressing Advanced CancerPhase I/IINCT04982224Locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic NSCLC with MET overexpressionREGN5093-M114METxMETMicrotubule inhibitorUntreated and active CNS disease and LMD excludedRecruiting
First-in-Human Study of XMT-1536 in Cancers Likely to Express NaPi2bPhase I/IINCT03319628Metastatic NSCLC adenocarcinomaUpifitamab rilsodotinNaPi2bAuristatin microtubule inhibitorUntreated CNS disease, such as new and progressive BM, and history of LMD excludedActive, not recruiting
An Efficacy and Safety Study of Cofetuzumab Pelidotin in Participants with PTK7-Expressing, Recurrent Non-Small Cell Lung CancerPhase INCT04189614Recurrent and treatment-refractory NSCLC with PTK7 expressionCofetuzumab pelidotinPTK7Auristatin microtubule inhibitorAsymptomatic and treated CNS disease included; active CNS disease excludedActive, not recruiting
Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) in Combination with Pembrolizumab with or Without Platinum Chemotherapy in Subjects with Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (TROPION-Lung02)Phase INCT04526691Locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic NSCLC without actionable genomic alterations (e.g., ROS1, MET, EGFR, ALK, etc.) and with treatment-refractory progressive disaseDatopotamab deruxtecanTROP2Topoisomerase I inhibitorActive and untreated CNS disease excludedActive, not recruiting
Phase 1b Study of Dato-DXd in Combination with Immunotherapy with or Without Carboplatin in Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (TROPION-Lung04)Phase INCT04612751Locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic NSCLC without EGFR- nor ALK-mutationsDatopotamab deruxtecanTROP2Topoisomerase I inhibitorClinically active CNS disease excludedRecruiting
A Study of Dato-DXd in Chinese Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Triple-negative Breast Cancer and Other Solid Tumors (TROPION-PanTumor02)Phase I/IINCT05460273Locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic NSCLC with treatment-refractory progressive diseaseDatopotamab deruxtecanTROP2Topoisomerase I inhibitorLMD excludedActive, not recruiting
SKB264 Combination Therapy in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.Phase IINCT05351788Locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic NSCLCSKB264TROP2Topoisomerase I inhibitorActive CNS metastasis, LMD, and metastases to the brainstem and spinal cord excludedRecruiting
Study of DS-1062a in Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer with Actionable Genomic Alterations (TROPION-Lung05)Phase IINCT04484142Locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic NSCLC with actionable genomic alterations (e.g., ROS1, MET, EGFR, ALK, etc.) and with treatment-refractory progressive disaseDatopotamab deruxtecanTROP2Topoisomerase I inhibitorInactive BM included; untreated and symptomatic CNS disease, and LMD excludedActive, not recruiting with results (no survival data available)
Study of Dato-DXd Plus Pembrolizumab vs. Pembrolizumab Alone in the First-line Treatment of Subjects with Advanced or Metastatic NSCLC Without Actionable Genomic Alterations (TROPION-Lung08)Phase IIINCT05215340Locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic NSCLC without actionable genomic alterations (e.g., ROS1, MET, EGFR, ALK, etc.) and with PD-L1 expression of 50% or moreDatopotamab deruxtecanTROP2Topoisomerase I inhibitorPreviously treated and stable BM included; active and untreated CNS disease, and LMD excludedRecruiting
Phase III, Open-label, First-line Study of Dato-DXd in Combination with Durvalumab and Carboplatin for Advanced NSCLC Without Actionable Genomic Alterations (AVANZAR)Phase IIINCT05687266Locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic NSCLC that is not amenable to chemoradiation and without actionable genomic alterations (e.g., ALK, ROS1, MET, etc.)Datopotamab deruxtecanTROP2Topoisomerase I inhibitorActive BM and history of LMD excludedRecruiting
Sacituzumab Tirumotecan (MK-2870) Versus Chemotherapy in Previously Treated Advanced or Metastatic Nonsquamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR Mutations or Other Genomic Alterations (MK-2870-004)Phase IIINCT06074588Locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic non-squamous NSCLC with treatment-refractory progressive diseaseSacituzumab tirumotecan TROP2Topoisomerase I inhibitorPreviously treated BM included; active CNS disease and LMD excludedRecruiting
Study of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) Monotherapy Versus Sacituzumab Govitecan in Combination with Pembrolizumab for Participants with Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) with Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) ≥50% (MK-3475-D46)Phase IIINCT05609968Metastatic NSCLC without an indication of EGFR-, ALK-1, or ROS-1 targeted therapies and with a PD-L1 tumor proportion score of 50% or moreSacituzumab govitecanTROP2Topoisomerase I inhibitorActive CNS disease and LMD excludedRecruiting
Solid tumor studies with NSCLC cohortA Study to Assess the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Antitumor Activity of BC3195 in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic CancerPhase INCT06548672Locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors, including NSCLC, that is refractory or not amenable to the standard of care therapyBC3195CDH3Auristatin microtubule inhibitorPreviously treated and stable BM included; active CNS disease and LMD excludedRecruiting
A Study of PF-08046050 (SGN-CEACAM5C) in Adults with Advanced Solid TumorsPhase INCT06131840Locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic solid tumors, including NSCLC, that is refractory or not amenable to the standard of care therapyPF-08046050CEACAM5Topoisomerase I inhibitorStable and treated BM includedRecruiting
A Phase 1 Study of CPO301 in Adult Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Solid TumorsPhase INCT05948865Advanced or metastatic solid tumors, including NSCLC, that is refractory or not amenable to the standard of care therapyCPO301EGFRNAKnown, active, or uncontrolled CNS disease and LMD excludedRecruiting
First in Human Study of AZD9592 in Solid Tumors (EGRET)Phase INCT05647122Locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors, including metastatic NSCLC in subgroups of EGFR-mutant or EGFR wild-type disease, that is refractory or not amenable to the standard of care therapyAZD9592EGFRxMETTopoisomerase I inhibitorStable and treated BM included; active and untreated BM and history of LMD excludedRecruiting
AMT-151 in Patients with Selected Advanced Solid TumoursPhase INCT05498597Advanced solid tumors, including NSCLC, that is refractory or not amenable to the standard of care therapyAMT-151FOLR1NAUntreated CNS disease excludedRecruiting
A Study of LY4170156 in Participants with Selected Advanced Solid TumorsPhase INCT06400472Advanced solid tumors, including NSCLC, that is refractory or not amenable to the standard of care therapyLY4170156FOLR1Topoisomerase I inhibitorActive and untreated BM, and history of LMD excludedRecruiting
A Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of MORAb-202 (Herein Referred to as Farletuzumab Ecteribulin), a Folate Receptor Alpha (FRα)-Targeting Antibody-drug Conjugate (ADC) in Participants with Selected Tumor TypesPhase I/IINCT04300556Metastatic solid tumors, including NSCLC, that is refractory or not amenable to the standard of care therapyFarletuzumab ecteribulinFOLR1Tubulin inhibitorTreated and stable BM included; untreated BM or subdural disease excludedRecruiting
PRO1184 for Advanced Solid Tumors (PRO1184-001)Phase I/IINCT05579366Locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic solid tumors, including NSCLC, that is refractory or not amenable to the standard of care therapyPRO1184FOLR1Topoisomerase I inhibitorPreviously treated and stable BM included; active CNS disease excludedRecruiting
Safety of GQ1001 in Adult Patients with HER2-Positive Advanced Solid TumorsPhase INCT04450732Locally advanced or metastatic HER2-expressing solid tumors, including NSCLC, that is refractory or not amenable to the standard of care therapyGQ1001HER2Pyrotinib, HER-TKITreated and asymptomatic BM included; untreated and symptomatic BM excludedRecruiting
DS8201a and Pembrolizumab in Participants with Locally Advanced/Metastatic Breast or Non-Small Cell Lung CancerPhase INCT04042701Locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer or NSCLC with HER2-overexpression or HER2-mutant diseaseTrastuzumab deruxtecanHER2Topoisomerase I inhibitorActive CNS disease excludedRecruiting
A Study of Disitamab Vedotin in Previously Treated Solid Tumors That Express HER2Phase IINCT06003231Locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic solid tumors, including NSCLC, that is refractory or not amenable to the standard of care therapy, has received prior PDL-(L)1, and has a HER2 overexpressionDisitamab vedotinHER2Auristatin microtubule inhibitorActive and untreated CNS disease and LMD excludedRecruiting
A Study of SGN-B6A in Chinese Participants with Advanced Solid TumorsPhase INCT06549816Locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic solid tumors, including NSCLC, that is refractory or not amenable to the standard of care therapySigvotatug vedotinIB6Auristatin microtubule inhibitorStable and treated BM included; active CNS disease excludedNot yet recruiting
A Study of SGN-MesoC2 in Advanced Solid TumorsPhase INCT06466187Locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic solid tumors, including NSCLC, that is refractory or not amenable to the standard of care therapySGN-MesoC2MSLNN/AStable and treated BM included; untreated BM and LMD excludedRecruiting
A Study of PHN-010 in Patients with Advanced Solid TumorsPhase INCT06457997Advanced or metastatic solid tumors, including NSCLC, that is refractory or not amenable to the standard of care therapyPHN-010NANAUntreated CNS disease excludedRecruiting
A Study of LY4101174 in Participants with Recurrent, Advanced or Metastatic Solid TumorsPhase INCT06238479Locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors, including NSCLC, that is refractory or not amenable to the standard of care therapyLY4101174NECTIN4Auristatin microtubule inhibitorKnown or suspected uncontrolled CNS disease excludedRecruiting
A Study of LY4052031 in Participants with Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Cancer or Other Solid Tumors (NEXUS-01)Phase INCT06465069Locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors, including NSCLC, that is refractory or not amenable to the standard of care therapyLY4052031NECTIN4Topoisomerase I inhibitorKnown or suspected uncontrolled CNS disease excludedRecruiting
Study BT8009-100 in Subjects with Nectin-4 Expressing Advanced MalignanciesPhase I/IINCT04561362Locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic solid tumors, including NSCLC, that is refractory or not amenable to the standard of care therapyBT8009NECTIN4Auristatin microtubule inhibitorActive and untreated CNS and LMD excludedRecruiting
CAB-ROR2-ADC Safety and Efficacy Study in Patients with TNBC or Head & Neck Cancer (Ph1) and NSCLC or Melanoma (Ph2)Phase I/IINCT03504488Locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic solid tumors, including NSCLC, that is refractory or not amenable to the standard of care therapyOzuriftamab vedotinROR2Auristatin microtubule inhibitorUncontrolled CNS disease excludedRecruiting
Study of XB002 in Subjects with Solid Tumors (JEWEL-101)Phase INCT04925284Locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic solid tumors, including metastatic NSCLC, that is refractory or not amenable to the standard of care therapyXB002TFAuristatin microtubule inhibitorTreated BM included; untreated and active BM or cranial epidural disease excludedActive, not recruiting
A Study to Evaluate TROP2 ADC LCB84 Single Agent and in Combination with an Anti-PD-1 Ab in Advanced Solid TumorsPhase I/IINCT05941507Advanced solid tumors, including NSCLC, that is refractory or not amenable to the standard of care therapyLCB84TROP2Auristatin microtubule inhibitorStable and treated BM included; active and progressing CNS disease or LMD excludedRecruiting
A Phase 1/2 Study of OBI-992 in Subjects with Advanced Solid TumorsPhase I/IINCT06480240Advanced or metastatic solid tumors, including NSCLC, that is refractory or not amenable to the standard of care therapyOBI-992TROP2Topoisomerase I inhibitorTreated and stable BM included; untreated CNS disease excludedRecruiting
Phase I-II, FIH, TROP2 ADC, Advanced Unresectable/Metastatic Solid Tumors, Refractory to Standard Therapies (A264)Phase I/IINCT04152499Locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors, including NSCLC, that is refractory or not amenable to the standard of care therapySacituzumab tirumotecanTROP2Topoisomerase I inhibitorSymptomatic and active BM, history of LMD, brainstem metastasis, and spinal cord metastasis excludedRecruiting
Abbreviations: ADC, antibody–drug conjugate; ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase; AXL, tyrosine-protein kinase receptor UFO; BM, brain metastases; CDH3, cadherin-3; CEACAM5, carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 5; CNS, central nervous system; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; FOLR1, folate receptor alpha-1; HER2/3, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2/3; LMD, leptomeningeal disease; MET, hepatocyte growth factor; MSLN, mesothelin; NA, not available; NaPi2b, sodium-dependent phosphate transport protein 2B; NECTIN4, nectin cell adhesion molecule 4; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; IB6, integrin beta-6; PD-(L)1, programmed cell death (ligand)1; PTK7, tyrosine-protein kinase-like 7; ROR2, receptor tyrosine kinase like orphan receptor 2; ROS1, ROS proto-oncogene 1; TF, human tissue factor; TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor; TROP2, trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bian, D.J.H.; Cohen, S.F.; Lazaratos, A.-M.; Bouganim, N.; Dankner, M. Antibody–Drug Conjugates for the Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Central Nervous System Metastases. Curr. Oncol. 2024, 31, 6314-6342. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31100471

AMA Style

Bian DJH, Cohen SF, Lazaratos A-M, Bouganim N, Dankner M. Antibody–Drug Conjugates for the Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Central Nervous System Metastases. Current Oncology. 2024; 31(10):6314-6342. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31100471

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bian, David J. H., Sara F. Cohen, Anna-Maria Lazaratos, Nathaniel Bouganim, and Matthew Dankner. 2024. "Antibody–Drug Conjugates for the Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Central Nervous System Metastases" Current Oncology 31, no. 10: 6314-6342. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31100471

APA Style

Bian, D. J. H., Cohen, S. F., Lazaratos, A. -M., Bouganim, N., & Dankner, M. (2024). Antibody–Drug Conjugates for the Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Central Nervous System Metastases. Current Oncology, 31(10), 6314-6342. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31100471

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop