Next Issue
Volume 16, 12
Previous Issue
Volume 16, 10
 
 
cardiovascmed-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser
Cardiovascular Medicine is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2025). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Editores Medicorum Helveticorum (EMH).

Cardiovasc. Med., Volume 16, Issue 11 (11 2013) – 5 articles

  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
6 pages, 157 KB  
Communication
ALMANAC 2013: Heart Failure
by Andrew L. Clark
Cardiovasc. Med. 2013, 16(11), 313; https://doi.org/10.4414/cvm.2013.00193 - 20 Nov 2013
Viewed by 34
Abstract
Epidemiology, the national audit and guidelines. The National Heart Failure Audit continues to be an invaluable resource for understanding how acute heart failure is managed in England and Wales [...] Full article
8 pages, 572 KB  
Communication
ALMANAC 2013: Acute Coronary Syndromes
by Pascal Meier, Alexandra J. Lansky and Andreas Baumbach
Cardiovasc. Med. 2013, 16(11), 306; https://doi.org/10.4414/cvm.2013.00191 - 20 Nov 2013
Viewed by 32
Abstract
Unstable coronary artery plaque is the most common underlying cause of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and can manifest as unstable angina, non-ST segment elevation infarction (NSTE-ACS), and ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), but can also manifest as sudden cardiac arrest due to ischaemia [...] Read more.
Unstable coronary artery plaque is the most common underlying cause of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and can manifest as unstable angina, non-ST segment elevation infarction (NSTE-ACS), and ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), but can also manifest as sudden cardiac arrest due to ischaemia induced tachyarrhythmias. ACS mortality has decreased significantly over the last few years, especially from the more extreme manifestations of ACS, STEMI, and cardiac arrest. This trend is likely to continue based on recent therapeutic progress which includes novel antiplatelet agents such as prasugrel, ticagrelor, and cangrelor. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

3 pages, 744 KB  
Case Report
Successful Treatment of Suspected Obstructing Thrombus with Acenocoumarol in a Patient with a Porcine Aortic Bioprosthesis
by Nicolas B. Dayal, François Ricou and Hajo Müller
Cardiovasc. Med. 2013, 16(11), 303; https://doi.org/10.4414/cvm.2013.00196 - 20 Nov 2013
Viewed by 36
Abstract
Obstructive thrombus is a rare complication of surgical valve replacement. Current guidelines recommend treatment with repeat surgery or fibrinolysis, especially in critically ill patients, despite a high risk of complication and death linked with these treatments. The treatment of haemodynamically stable patients is, [...] Read more.
Obstructive thrombus is a rare complication of surgical valve replacement. Current guidelines recommend treatment with repeat surgery or fibrinolysis, especially in critically ill patients, despite a high risk of complication and death linked with these treatments. The treatment of haemodynamically stable patients is, however, less well documented. We describe the rare case of a 40-year-old patient presenting with symptomatic but stable obstruction late after porcine bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement, who was successfully treated with oral anticoagulation. Interruption of oral anticoagulation resulted in rapid recurrence of obstruction, highlighting the importance of long-term anticoagulation in such cases. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

4 pages, 699 KB  
Article
Anticoagulation in Primary Care—A Cross Sectional Study in 14 Heterogeneous Countries
by Sven Streit, Richard Roberts, Robert Anders Burman, Persijn J. Honkoop and Damian N. Meli
Cardiovasc. Med. 2013, 16(11), 299; https://doi.org/10.4414/cvm.2013.00190 - 20 Nov 2013
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 32
Abstract
Background: New oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are predicted to become the new standard treatment for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation, and may replace vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). NOACs are prescribed less than expected, even though they do not require international normalised [...] Read more.
Background: New oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are predicted to become the new standard treatment for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation, and may replace vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). NOACs are prescribed less than expected, even though they do not require international normalised ratio (INR) monitoring. In this study we assessed methods for INR monitoring after the introduction of NOACs a in heterogeneous sample of countries. Methods: We asked representatives of the Vasco da Gama Movement, a network of junior and future general practitioners (GPs) in Europe, and WONCA, the World Organization of Family Doctors, to describe the way INR is monitored in their respective countries. Results: Representatives of 14 countries responded. In most countries, the INR is monitored by GPs; in some countries, these patients are treated by other specialists or in specialised anticoagulation centres. In only a few countries, anticoagulated patients monitor the INR themselves. Conclusion: Our study showed several strategies for managing anticoagulation in different countries. In most countries, the INR is monitored by GPs. These consultations offer opportunities to address other issues, such as blood pressure control or medication adherence. These factors may be considered when deciding to switch patients from VKAs to NOACs. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1008 KB  
Review
Assessment of Myocardial Viability After the STICH-Trial: Still Viable?
by Ines Valenta, Alessandra Quercioli, Terrence T. Ruddy and Thomas H. Schindler
Cardiovasc. Med. 2013, 16(11), 289; https://doi.org/10.4414/cvm.2013.00189 - 20 Nov 2013
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 39
Abstract
Ischaemic heart disease predominantly accounts for the majority of patients with heart failure symptoms. The prevalence of ischaemic cardiomyopathy (CMP) is continuously increasing owing to an increasingly elderly population and improved survival of acute coronary syndrome patients. Coronary revascularisation may improve left ventricular [...] Read more.
Ischaemic heart disease predominantly accounts for the majority of patients with heart failure symptoms. The prevalence of ischaemic cardiomyopathy (CMP) is continuously increasing owing to an increasingly elderly population and improved survival of acute coronary syndrome patients. Coronary revascularisation may improve left ventricular function, heart failure symptoms and cardiovascular outcome in those highrisk patients who have evidence of a sufficient degree of myocardial viability subtended to the target epicardial lesion. Optimal assessment of myocardial viability, therefore, remains essential for an optimal medical decision-making process in these patients. Recently, the STICH (Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure) trial was performed, in which 1212 ischaemic CMP patients were randomly assigned to receive medical therapy alone or medical therapy plus coronary artery bypass grafting. Although in these inter mediaterisk patients the presence of viable myocardium was associated with a greater likelihood of survival, in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction, this relationship did not hold after adjustment for other baseline clinical variables. At first glance, these observations may be surprising and contradictory to previous retrospective or observational investigations in the assessment of myocardial viability in ischaemic CMP patients. Several factors, however, may reconcile, at least in part, this controversy in viability assessment, treatment and clinical outcome of ischaemic CMP patients, such as (1.) the timing of coronary revascularisation, (2.) absence or presence of ischaemically compromised but viable myocardium, (3.) stage of the myocardial remodelling process and (4.) use of suboptimal imaging protocols and techniques to determine the presence or absence of ischaemically jeopardised but viable myocardium. These aspects and the role of other imaging modalities will be discussed. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Previous Issue
Next Issue
Back to TopTop