Next Article in Journal
Living Space and Job Prospects and Their Relationship with Subjective Well-Being during COVID-19 Confinement in Spain: The Mediator Role of Resilience
Next Article in Special Issue
Mood and Changes in Alcohol Consumption in Young Adults during COVID-19 Lockdown: A Model Explaining Associations with Perceived Immune Fitness and Experiencing COVID-19 Symptoms
Previous Article in Journal
Preliminary Research: Validation of the Method of Evaluating Resistance to Surface Wetting with Liquid of Protective Materials Intended for Polymer Protective Gloves
Previous Article in Special Issue
Changes in Alcohol Consumption Pattern Based on Gender during COVID-19 Confinement in Spain
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 18
Issue 17
10.3390/ijerph18179203
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Binge Drinking: The Top 100 Cited Papers

by
María-Teresa Cortés-Tomás
1,
José-Antonio Giménez-Costa
1,*,
Beatriz Martín-del-Río
2,
Consolación Gómez-Íñiguez
3 and
Ángel Solanes-Puchol
2
1
Basic Psychology Department, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
2
Department of Behavioural Sciences and Health, University Miguel Hernandez, 03205 Elche, Spain
3
Department of Basic and Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, University Jaume I, 12071 Castellón de la Plana, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(17), 9203; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179203
Submission received: 14 July 2021 / Revised: 23 August 2021 / Accepted: 27 August 2021 / Published: 31 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Addiction and Alcohol Abuse)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
We conducted a review to analyze the 100 most-cited studies on binge drinking (BD) in the Web of Science (WoS) database to determine their current status and the aspects that require further attention. We carried out a retrospective bibliometric analysis in January 2021. The year of publication, authors, design, subject, journal, institution and lead author’s country, as well as the definition of BD, were extracted from the articles. The data on the country, year, thematic category of the journals and their rank were obtained from the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) Journal Citation Reports 2020. The number of citations was collected from the WoS, and the h index was collected from the Scopus database. The citation density and Bradford’s law were calculated. The majority of the articles were empirical quantitative studies with a cross-sectional design published between 1992 and 2013 in 49 journals. There were 306 authors, mostly English-speaking and from the USA. The definitions used to describe BD are not homogeneous. The most-cited topics were the analysis of consequences, determinants and epidemiology. There is a need to unify the definitions of BD and base them on scientific evidence. The multidisciplinary nature of BD is not well reflected in each of the thematic areas discussed in this work.

1. Introduction

Binge drinking (BD) is a risky alcohol consumption pattern with a high prevalence at the international level, especially among the youngest population [1,2,3,4].
Given that BD is a pattern of consumption with multiple consequences at the organizational, psychological and social levels for both the binge drinker and those around him or her [5,6,7], in recent years, much research has been generated on this topic.
One method that allows the quantitative analysis of scientific production and the thematic evolution of a determined field of research is bibliometry [8]. Metrics such as the number of publications, the number of citations or the impact factor (IF) of journals are often used as measures of relevance or productivity [9,10].
Using such metrics, the analysis of the most-cited articles on a topic allows us to identify which contributions are more visible, which have been more recognized or those that have exerted greater influence on the scientific community beyond the limits of their field of expertise [11,12,13]. Furthermore, from the point of view of science policy based on excellence, examining highly cited works has been considered an option for the detection and monitoring of “excellent” scientific research [11].
In recent years, numerous studies have been conducted to determine and analyze the most-cited papers in various fields of knowledge. In the health fields, such analyses have been performed in areas such as surgery [14], cardiovascular disease [15] and ophthalmology [16]. Analyses have also been conducted in areas of psychological health, such as occupational stress [17] and obsessive–compulsive disorder [18]. However, this methodological approach has been limited in the area of addictions [19]. The relevant studies have focused on substance use disorders [20,21], and bibliometric analyses on BD are nonexistent.
The main objective of this study is the analysis of the 100 most-cited articles in the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) Web of Science (WoS) database (Thomson Reuters, Philadelphia, PA, USA) to provide a unique perspective on the current situation and opportunities for BD research, intervention and formation in the coming years.

2. Materials and Method

2.1. Search Methods

On 7 January 2021, the WoS Core Collection was searched with the keywords: “binge drinking”, “heavy episodic drinking”, “heavy drinking”, “heavy sessional drinking”, “dangerous drinking”, “risky single-occasion drinking”, “high-risk drinking”, “risky single occasion drinking”, “high risk drinking”, “excessive episodic consumption”, “frequent binge drinking”, “concentrated drinking episode” or “episodic heavy drinking”. These are all terms suggested by Cortés and Motos [1] in their review on how to define and measure BD. The search terms were included in the “topic” field (title, abstract, author’s keywords and KeyWords Plus). No filters were used in the fields of language, time, human studies, territory, affiliations or availability.

2.2. Search Outcome

A total of 15,894 studies were obtained. A modified approach to the method used by Lim et al. [22] and other authors [13,23,24] who have investigated the most-cited articles in different areas of healthcare was used. Three experts with more than 10 years of experience in BD research with youth (M.-T.C.-T., J.-A.G.-C. and C.G.-Í.) independently selected and analyzed the 100 articles with the highest number of citations. The inclusion criterion was that BD be the main topic or one of the main research variables. The exclusion criteria were studies that (1) were not related to alcohol consumption, (2) focused on general alcohol consumption without specific reference to BD or (3) considered BD as a secondary variable in the study. Disagreements among experts, although not frequent, were resolved in a consensus meeting. The flow of information through the different phases of the review (PRISMA flow diagram) is shown in Figure 1.
For articles with the same number of citations, the one with the highest citation density (total number of citations/years since publication) was classified first.

2.3. Quality Appraisal

An evaluation of the quality of the bibliographic sample was not performed since this study was a bibliometric analysis. As an objective indicator, we show the volume of citations in the WoS, which, although not an absolute measure of the quality of an article [25], is an index of the impact the article has exerted in the scientific community, with the assumption that high-quality research will result in a greater number of citations than lower-quality research [26].

2.4. Data Abstraction and Synthesis

Information was directly abstracted from the 100 articles for the year of publication, authors, design, subject, journal in which the article was published and the institution and country of the lead author. The design was classified into six categories [27]: (1) review studies, including systematic reviews and meta-analyses; (2) development and validation studies of instruments or scales; (3) cross-sectional studies, including follow-up studies using questionnaires, surveys or interviews; (4) papers using a qualitative methodology; (5) discussions on topics or methods; and (6) other types of studies that are not included in any of the other categories, e.g., longitudinal studies. The subject was also classified into six broad categories: (1) BD consequences, (2) determinants, (3) epidemiology, (4) intervention proposals, (5) consumption trajectories and (6) other, less frequent topics (evaluation, terminology discussions, typologies of consumers and psychiatric comorbidity). Finally, information was obtained on how BD was defined in each study according to three aspects [1]: amount of consumption, time interval and frequency.
From the ISI Journal Citation Reports 2020, data regarding the country of publication, the IF of the journals, its thematic category and its ranking in that category were obtained. The data on the number of citations for each study were obtained from the WoS, and the h index of the most-cited authors was obtained from the Scopus database.
Finally, the citation density of the articles and Bradford’s law were calculated. The citation density, or the average of annual citations, allowed us to obtain an index of the relative impact of an article regardless of the year of publication [23,28]. Bradford’s law [29,30] allowed the establishment of an objective measure of the weight of each journal in the top 100 by distributing the total number of journals into three productivity zones with a similar number of articles but a decreasing number of journals.

3. Results

3.1. Most-Cited Articles, Citation Density and Temporal Distribution

The top 100 most-cited articles related to BD are presented in Table 1 in descending order according to the number of citations. Together, they total 34,908 citations (ranging from 1280 to 180). Only 30 articles qualified as “citation classics”, i.e., having 400 or more citations [31].
All of the articles were published across a 21-year range, between 1992 and 2013 (shown in Figure 2). The period between 2000 and 2009 shows the highest number of studies (n = 79) and the highest number of citations (n = 27,181; 77.86%), and the period between 2010 and 2013 has the highest density of citations (34.52 citations/year).

3.2. Publication Type, Main Topics, BD Definition and Target Population

Most of the BD papers were empirical studies (n = 73). Of these, 39 were cross-sectional studies, including questionnaire and follow-up surveys or interviews, and 34 had a longitudinal design. Literature reviews were less frequent (n = 19). Of these, three were meta-analyses, nine were systematic reviews and seven reviews did not provide details on the methodology used to select the articles. Finally, of the remaining eight studies, two focused on the development or validation of an instrument or scale, one was a qualitative study and five were a discussion of a method or topic.
Regarding the topics of the 100 most important studies related to BD, the analysis of its consequences stands out, with 28 publications and 32.22% of the citations (n = 11,246). This topic also showed the greatest increase in citations since 1999 and began its decline very recently in 2016 (shown in Figure 3). The second most-cited topic (n = 27; 8784 citations, 25.17%) was the study of the variables or determinants underlying BD, with a stable and low volume of citations until 2004 and strong growth over the following 10 years.
With respect to the works on epidemiology (n = 14) and intervention proposals (n = 12), they had practically the same number of citations (n = 4324, 12.39%; n = 4034, 11.56%, respectively). The works on intervention were initially the second most cited between 2003 and 2006, with a large decrease since 2015. Finally, the works on the analysis of changes in consumption trajectories according to the growth and maturity of the subjects evaluated (n = 10; 3405 citations, 9.75%) increased their citations between 1996 and 2008 and have since remained stable. The rest of the articles focused on topics such as BD assessment (n = 3; 1384 citations), concept analysis (n = 3; 1121 citations), determination of consumer typologies (n = 2; 428 citations) or aspects related to psychiatric comorbidity (n = 1; 281 citations).
An analysis of the definitions of BD used (shown in Figure 4) showed that the most frequent (n = 48) differentiated the amount of alcohol consumption by gender (five or more standard drinks for men and four or more for women). In contrast, approximately 25% of the studies used a generic definition (five or more standard drinks) that did not differentiate by gender. The other articles offered specific definitions, and commonalities among them cannot be established. Three articles did not include a definition of BD.
Regarding the samples of these studies, interest in the university population stands out (n = 44). In addition, the USA population was the most frequently studied (n = 71).

3.3. Authors and Institutions

A total of 306 authors contributed to the 100 most-cited papers on BD. Five of the studies were single-authored [41,71,98,119,125], and 20 authors contributed to three or more articles (Table 2).
With regard to the authors’ affiliation, only the author who appears first in the author list was considered. These 100 authors belonged to 59 institutions from seven different countries, with a greater participation from the USA (n = 62), and 3 institutions from countries where English is not the first language (Finland, Lebanon and Switzerland).
Sixteen institutions contributed more than one paper. The institution with the largest contribution was the Harvard School of Public Health (USA) (n = 16). The University of California (USA) and the University of Washington (USA) appear second with five papers each. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (USA), Syracuse University (USA), the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (USA), the University of Michigan (USA) and the Center for Addiction and Mental Health at the University of Toronto (Canada) contributed three papers each.

3.4. Journals in Which the Top 100 Articles Were Published

A total of 49 journals published the 100 most-cited articles on BD (Table 3). After Bradford’s law was applied, the core distribution comprised three journals: the Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs (known until 2006 as the Journal of Studies on Alcohol) (14 papers; 5322 citations); the Journal of American College Health (8 papers; 3373 citations) and JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association (6 papers; 3074 citations).
As for the Journal Citation Reports (JCR) categories in which these journals are indexed (they can be classified in more than one category), 42.55% are in categories related to medicine (general, psychiatry, pediatrics, cardiology, obstetrics, etc.). Sixteen (30.04%) are in categories related to psychology (clinical, developmental and multidisciplinary); fourteen (29.78%) are in the category of substance abuse; and 23.40% are in the category of public, environmental and occupational health. The rest of the journals (n = 6) are classified into the categories of biochemistry, behavioral sciences, demography, education, neurosciences, neuroimaging, pharmacology and sport sciences.
The journals’ IFs ranged between 45.54 and 1.214 ( X ¯ = 4.03), with the JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association at the top. With respect to the JCR quartiles of these journals in their categories, 74.46% are located in Q1, 23.40% in Q2, 4% in Q3 and 1% in Q4. The rest (n = 2) have not had this value calculated since they were incorporated in their category this year. All but two of the journals are published in the USA (71.42%) or UK (24.48%).

4. Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first bibliometric study to systematically identify and classify the top 100 most-cited papers in BD research. The results of our study provide various benefits for researchers and practitioners in BD. First, the results help new researchers understand the types of contributions, approaches, topics, populations and research methods applied in highly cited papers, enabling researchers to learn from them in writing higher-quality papers that will likely receive high numbers of citations. Second, such reviews help both veteran and new researchers identify topics with more visibility or impact so as to carry out more incremental research in those areas, as well as to identify topics on which more research should be conducted for greater visibility. Third, using such reviews, researchers and practitioners can identify the most frequently cited researchers and institutions with whom to collaborate, receive advice and training and so forth. Fourth, the results help practitioners identify research considered of higher scientific “excellence” in the specific field of BD and to use the techniques, programs or results reported in these studies.
The results show that these articles had 306 authors from 59 institutions in seven different countries. The country that contributed the most papers was the United States; moreover, most of the authors are from English-speaking institutions, as seen in similar studies [12,13,23,132]. Judging by these results, research in other countries that have this pattern of consumption needs greater visibility [19], as BD shows differences and similarities between countries that affect the generalization of the results [62].
In addition, the articles under study were published in 49 journals, of which only 14 belonged to the specific category on this topic of “substance abuse”, with the bulk of the journals belonging to the categories of medicine, public health and psychology. This differentiation reaffirms the multidisciplinary nature of the most visible research on BD, which transcends its specialty. If we focus on these journals’ IFs, as in other studies [13,133], the results confirm that the most-cited works on BD have been published mainly in journals located in the first and second quartiles of their categories. Furthermore, although the number of citations ranges between 1280 and 180, only 30 of these articles qualify as “citation classics” [31].
The topic most referred to in these works is that of specific medical consequences (e.g., cardiovascular effects, effects on the fetus and brain damage). The few works on the psychosocial consequences are often limited to listing them without exploring any in further detail.
The second most-cited topic is that of context-related BD determinants, specifically regarding the social norms of fellow drinkers or of the areas in which they live. Most are descriptive studies that do not estimate the weight or importance of these determinants in the development of BD and are also subject to uncontrolled cultural aspects. These characteristics make it difficult to generalize to other samples, other contexts or other countries.
The results of the review fail to reflect the multidisciplinary nature of BD in any topical area discussed in this work. In the studies on the consequences, physiological aspects predominate. The studies on determinants highlight those of a social nature. Regarding intervention, the most-cited articles are those of a psychosocial nature: brief motivational interventions, those focused on aspects of the consumer’s personality and, to a lesser extent, those based on normative feedback or marketing.
Several of the authors indicate that three main parameters are referenced in the research to characterize the operational definitions of BD [1,58]: the amount of alcohol consumed, the duration of the consumption episode and the time interval at which the presence of BD is recorded. In the most-cited work on BD, it is confirmed, on the one hand, that few articles include the three parameters and, on the other hand, that there is no consensus in defining each of these. Similar results have been found in recent reviews of the concept of BD [134].
The most commonly used parameter is the amount of alcohol ingested. However, in one in four studies, the definition of BD implemented does not align with any that are agreed upon in the literature. Additionally, very few differentiate the amount of alcohol ingested according to gender, ignoring the metabolic aspects associated with this substance [135,136]. Regarding the duration-of-consumption parameter, there is a notable inaccuracy of the interval evaluated, the most widely used being “a single occasion”. The low rigor with which these highly cited studies define the patterns of BD is striking. For BD, it is not only the large quantity of alcohol consumed that should be relevant but also that consumption is carried out in a short and quantifiable time interval, which could be indicated by the number of hours the person spent drinking [137].
The last of the parameters, the time interval of BD, accounts for the episodic and irregular nature of this consumption pattern. The time periods defined by many of these works are short and do not allow accounting for this discontinuity, such as “the past week” or “the last 30 days”.
Therefore, the diversity of the definitions found in the most-cited articles on BD, with special mention of nondifferentiation by gender or the differences in the time intervals of consumption, highlights the need to visualize conceptual advances in BD that will allow the homogenization of the results derived from the research.
As limitations of this work, first, we used only one database for our search for the most-cited papers. This procedure conditioned our list and ranking, which may have differed if we had used a different database, such as Scopus or Google Scholar [138]. Citations obtained exclusively from the WoS are limited to the sources selected using this database, which, for example, does not include citations in books and journals published in languages other than English. Nevertheless, we chose this database because, although it does not provide complete coverage, it has been extensive and multidisciplinary since 1900 and includes more than 12,000 journals with an impact across the world, including open access journals [139]. Second, self-citations and citations in lectures, textbooks and web-based literature have not been considered [140]. The positive or negative nature of the citations of the top 100 articles were not considered in this work, and thus, we were unable to determine the level of agreement, disagreement or criticism from the scientific community regarding the topics covered in these articles [141,142].

5. Conclusions

The analysis of the 100 most-cited articles in BD offers a unique perspective on the most visible works in this area, providing insights about the need to unify the definitions of binge drinking based on the scientific evidence agreed upon by experts. Moreover, the topical areas analyzed do not clearly reflect the multidisciplinary nature of the BD. In the same way, research from other countries that have this pattern of consumption needs greater visibility to show the differences and similarities between countries that will affect the generalization of the results.

Author Contributions

M.-T.C.-T., J.-A.G.-C. and B.M.-d.-R., have made substantial contributions to the conception and design, acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data and drafting of the article. C.G.-Í. and Á.S.-P. have made substantial contributions to the conception, design and interpretation of data, and the critical revision for important intellectual content of the study. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

No financial support was received for this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cortés, M.T.; Motos, P. Guía clínica sobre consumo intensivo de alcohol en jóvenes. In Guía Clínica Sobre Consumo Intensivo de Alcohol en Jóvenes; Cortés, M.T., Ed.; Socidrogalcohol: Barcelona, Spain, 2015; pp. 25–46. [Google Scholar]
  2. Johnston, L.D.; O’Malley, P.M.; Bachman, J.G.; Schulenberg, J.E.; Miech, R.A. Monitoring the Future National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975–2014: College Students and Adults Ages 19–55 (Volume 2); Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan: Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  3. Plan Nacional Sobre Drogas. Plan de Acción Sobre Adicciones 2018–2020; PNSD: Madrid, Spain, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  4. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Abuse and Mental Health Indicators in the United States: Results from the 2016 National Survey on Drug Use and Health; NSDUH Series H-52; Publication No. SMA 17-5044; HHS: Washington, DC, USA, 2017.
  5. Ferreira, J.A.; Martins, J.S.; Coelho, M.S.; Kahler, C.W. Validation of brief young adult alcohol consequences questionnaire (B-YAACQ): Portuguese version. Span. J. Psychol. 2014, 17, 17–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lee, C.M.; Maggs, J.L.; Neighbors, C.; Patrick, M.E. Positive and negative alcohol-related consequences: Associations with past drinking. J. Adolesc. 2011, 34, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. White, H.R.; Ray, A.E. Differential Evaluations of Alcohol-Related Consequences among Emerging Adults. Prev. Sci. 2014, 15, 115–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Cobo, M.J.; López-Herrera, A.G.; Herrera-Viedma, E.; Herrera, F. Science Mapping Software Tools: Review, Analysis, and Cooperative Study Among Tools. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2011, 62, 1382–1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Agarwal, A.; Durairajanayagam, D.; Tatagari, S.; Esteves, S.C.; Harlev, A.; Henkel, R.; Roychoudhury, S.; Homa, S.; Garrido-Puchalt, N.; Ramasamy, R.; et al. Bibliometrics: Tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics. Asian J. Androl. 2016, 18, 296–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Kinnin, J.; Hanna, T.N.; Jutras, M.; Hasan, B.; Bhatia, R.; Khosa, F. Top 100 Cited articles on Radiation Exposure in Medical Imaging: A Bibliometric Analysis. Curr. Probl. Diagn. Radiol. 2019, 48, 368–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Aksnes, D.W. Characteristics of highly cited papers. Res. Eval. 2003, 12, 159–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Joyce, C.W.; Joyce, K.M.; Kelly, J.C.; Kelly, J.L.; Carroll, S.M.; Sugrue, C. An Analysis of the "Classic" Papers in Aesthetic Surgery. Aesthetic Plast. Surg. 2015, 39, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Shuaib, W.; Khan, M.S.; Shahid, H.; Valdes, E.A.; Alweis, R. Bibliometric Analysis of the Top 100 Cited Cardiovascular Articles. Am. J. Cardiol. 2015, 115, 972–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Karsan, R.B.; Powell, A.G.; Nanjaiah, P.; Mehta, D.; Valtzoglou, V. The top 100 manuscripts in emergency cardiac surgery. Potential role in cardiothoracic training. A bibliometric analysis. Ann. Med. Surg. 2019, 43, 5–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Malhotra, K.; Saeed, O.; Goyal, N.; Katsanos, A.H.; Tsivgoulis, G. Top-100 highest-cited original articles in ischemic stroke, a bibliometric analysis. World Neurosurg. 2018, 111, e649–e660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wong, M.Y.; Tan, N.Y.; Sabanayagam, C. Time trends, disease patterns and gender imbalance in the top 100 most cited articles in ophthalmology. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2019, 103, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Nowrouzi, B.; Nguyen, C.; Casole, J.; Nowrouzi-Kia, B. Occupational Stress, A Comprehensive Review of the Top 50 Annual and Lifetime Cited Articles. Workplace Health Saf. 2017, 65, 197–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Parmar, A.; Ganesh, R.; Mishra, A.K. The top 100 cited articles on Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD), A citation analysis. Asian J. Psychiat. 2019, 42, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Bramness, J.G.; Henriksen, B.; Person, O.; Mann, K. A bibliometric analysis of European versus USA research in the field of addiction. Research on alcohol, narcotics, prescription drug abuse, tobacco and steroids 2001–2011. Eur. Addict. Res. 2013, 20, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Akbar, H.F.; Siddiq, K.; Nusrat, S. Citation Classics and Trends in the Field of Opioids, A Bibliometric Analysis. Cureus 2019, 11, e5055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Sweileh, W.M.; Zyoud, S.H.; Al-Jabi, S.W.; Sawalha, A.F. Bibliometric analysis of diabetes mellitus research output from Middle Eastern Arab countries during the period (1996–2012). Scientometrics 2014, 101, 819–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lim, K.J.; Yoon, D.Y.; Yun, E.J.; Seo, Y.L.; Baek, S.; Gu, D.H.; Yoon, S.J.; Han, A.; Ku, Y.J.; Kim, S.S. Characteristics and trends of radiology research, a survey of original articles published in AJR and Radiology between 2001 and 2010. Radiology 2012, 264, 796–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Huo, Y.Q.; Pan, X.H.; Li, Q.B.; Wang, X.Q.; Jiao, X.J.; Jia, Z.W.; Wang, S.J. Fifty top-cited classic papers in orthopedic elbow surgery, a bibliometric analysis. Int. J. Surg. 2015, 18, 28–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Martín-Del-Río, B.; Solanes-Puchol, A.; Martínez-Zaragoza, F.; Benavides-Gil, G. Stress in nurses, The 100 top-cited papers published in nursing journals. J. Adv. Nurs. 2018, 74, 1488–1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Bramness, J.G.; von Soest, T. A longitudinal study of cannabis use increasing the use of asthma medication in young Norwegian adults. BMC Pulm. Med. 2019, 19, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.D. What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. J. Doc. 2008, 64, 45–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wong, E.L.Y.; Tam, W.W.S.; Wong, F.C.Y.; Cheung, A.W.L. Citation classics in nursing journals, The top 50 most frequently cited articles from 1956 to 2011. Nurs. Res. 2013, 62, 344–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Namdari, S.; Baldwin, K.; Kovatch, K.; Huffman, G.R.; Glaser, D. Fifty most cited articles in orthopedic shoulder surgery. J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 2012, 21, 1796–1802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Bradford, S. Sources of information on specific subjects. Engineering 1934, 137, 85–86. [Google Scholar]
  30. Brookes, B.C. Bradfords law and bibliography of science. Nature 1969, 224, 953–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Garfield, E. What is a citation classic. 2013. Available online: https://http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/classics.html (accessed on 17 August 2021).
  32. Wechsler, H.; Davenport, A.; Dowdall, G.; Moeykens, B.; Castillo, S. Health and Behavioral Consequences of Binge Drinking in College A National Survey of Students at 140 Campuses. JAMA 1994, 272, 1672–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wechsler, H.; Lee, J.E.; Kuo, M.; Seibring, M.; Nelson, T.F.; Lee, H. Trends in college binge drinking during a period of increased prevention efforts, Findings from 4 harvard school of public health college alcohol study surveys 1993–2001. J. Am. Coll. Health Assoc. 2002, 50, 203–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. O’Malley, P.M.; Johnston, L.D. Epidemiology of alcohol and other drug use among American college students. J. Stud. Alcohol. 2002, 63 (Suppl. S14), 23–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kuntsche, E.; Knibbe, R.; Gmel, G.; Engels, R. Why do young people drink? A review of drinking motives. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 2005, 25, 841–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Borsari, B.; Carey, K.B. Peer influences on college drinking, A review of the research. J. Subst. Abuse. 2001, 13, 391–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Wechsler, H.; Lee, J.E.; Kuo, M.; Lee, H. College binge drinking in the 1990s, A continuing problem. J. Am. Coll. Health 2000, 48, 199–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hingson, R.; Heeren, T.; Winter, M.; Wechsler, H. Magnitude of alcohol-related mortality and morbidity among U.S. college students ages 18–24, Changes from 1998 to 2001. Annu. Rev. Public Health 2005, 26, 259–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Naimi, T.S.; Brewer, R.D.; Mokdad, A.; Denny, C.; Serdula, M.K.; Mark, J.S. Binge drinking among US adults. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2003, 289, 70–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Marlatt, G.A.; Baer, J.S.; Kivlahan, D.R.; Dimeff, L.A.; Larimer, M.E.; Quigley, L.A.; Somers, J.M.; Williams, E. Screening and brief intervention for high-risk college student drinkers, Results from a 2-year follow-up assessment. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 1998, 66, 604–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Perkins, H.W. Surveying the damage, A review of research on consequences of alcohol misuse in college populations. J. Stud. Alcohol. 2002, 63 (Suppl. S14), 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Crews, F.; He, J.; Hodge, C. Adolescent cortical development, A critical period of vulnerability for addiction. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2007, 86, 189–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Schulenberg, J.E.; Maggs, J.L. A developmental perspective on alcohol use and heavy drinking during adolescence and the transition to young adulthood. J. Stud. Alcohol. 2002, 63 (Suppl. S14), 54–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Miller, J.W.; Naimi, T.S.; Brewer, R.D.; Jones, S.E. Binge drinking and associated health risk behaviors among high school students. Pediatrics 2007, 119, 76–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Bouchery, E.E.; Harwood, H.J.; Sacks, J.J.; Simon, C.J.; Brewer, R.D. Economic costs of excessive alcohol consumption in the U.S., 2006. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2011, 41, 516–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Wechsler, H.; Dowdall, G.W.; Davenport, A.; Rimm, E.B. A gender-specific measure of binge drinking among college students. Am. J. Public Health 1995, 85, 982–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Wechsler, H.; Dowdall, G.W.; Davenport, A.; Castillo, S. Correlates of college student binge drinking. Am. J. Public Health 1995, 85, 921–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Chassin, L.; Pitts, S.C.; Prost, J. Binge drinking trajectories from adolescence to emerging adulthood in a high-risk sample, Predictors and substance abuse outcomes. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 2002, 70, 67–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Carey, K.B.; Scott-Sheldon, L.A.J.; Carey, M.P.; DeMartini, K.S. Individual-level interventions to reduce college student drinking, A meta-analytic review. Addict. Behav. 2007, 32, 2469–2494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Wechsler, H.; Dowdall, G.W.; Maenner, G.; Gledhill-Hoyt, J.; Lee, H. Changes in binge drinking and related problems among American college students between 1993 and 1997 results of the harvard school of public health college alcohol study. J. Am. Coll. Health Assoc. 1998, 47, 57–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wilsnack, R.W.; Vogeltanz, N.D.; Wilsnack, S.C.; Harris, T.R. Gender differences in alcohol consumption and adverse drinking consequences, Cross-cultural patterns. Addiction 2000, 95, 251–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Neighbors, C.; Larimer, M.E.; Lewis, M.A. Targeting misperceptions of descriptive drinking norms, Efficacy of a computer-delivered personalized normative feedback intervention. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 2004, 72, 434–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Ham, L.S.; Hope, D.A. College students and problematic drinking, A review of the literature. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 2003, 23, 719–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Knight, J.R.; Wechsler, H.; Kuo, M.; Seibring, M.; Weitzman, E.R.; Schuckit, M.A. Alcohol abuse and dependence among U.S. college students. J. Stud. Alcohol. 2002, 63, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Bradley, K.A.; Bush, K.R.; Epler, A.J.; Dobie, D.J.; Davis, T.M.; Sporleder, J.L.; Maynard, C.; Burman, M.L.; Kivlahan, D.R. Two brief alcohol-screening tests from the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), Validation in a female Veterans Affairs patient population. Arch. Intern. Med. 2003, 163, 821–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Schulenberg, J.; O’Malley, P.M.; Bachman, J.G.; Wadsworth, K.N.; Johnston, L.D. Getting drunk and growing up, Trajectories of frequent binge drinking during the transition to young adulthood. J. Stud. Alcohol. 1996, 57, 289–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Jacobson, I.G.; Ryan, M.A.K.; Hooper, T.I.; Smith, T.C.; Amoroso, P.J.; Boyko, E.J.; Gackstetter, G.D.; Wells, T.S.; Bell, N.S. Alcohol use and alcohol-related problems before and after military combat deployment. JAMA—J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2008, 300, 663–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Courtney, K.E.; Polich, J. Binge drinking in young adults, Data, definitions, and determinants. Psychol. Bull. 2009, 135, 142–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Neighbors, C.; Lee, C.M.; Lewis, M.A.; Fossos, N.; Larimer, M.E. Are social norms the best predictor of outcomes among heavy-drinking college students? J. Stud. Alcohol. Drugs 2007, 68, 556–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Borsari, B.; Carey, K.B. Effects of a brief motivational intervention with college student drinkers. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 2000, 68, 728–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wechsler, H.; Nelson, T.F. Binge drinking and the American college students, What’s five drinks? Psychol. Addict. Behav. 2001, 15, 287–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Kuntsche, E.; Rehm, J.; Gmel, G. Characteristics of binge drinkers in Europe. Soc. Sci. Med. 2004, 59, 113–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Crews, F.T.; Boettiger, C.A. Impulsivity, frontal lobes and risk for addiction. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2009, 93, 237–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Chen, P.; Jacobson, K.C. Developmental trajectories of substance use from early adolescence to young adulthood, Gender and racial/ethnic differences. J. Adolesc. Health 2012, 50, 154–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Fleming, M.F.; Mundt, M.P.; French, M.T.; Manwell, L.B.; Stauffacher, E.A.; Barry, K.L. Brief Physician Advice for Problem Drinkers, Long-Term Efficacy and Benefit-Cost Analysis. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2002, 26, 36–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. White, A.; Hingson, R. The burden of alcohol use, Excessive alcohol consumption and related consequences among college students. Alcohol. Res. Curr. Rev. 2013, 35, 201–218. [Google Scholar]
  67. Brown, S.A.; McGue, M.; Maggs, J.; Schulenberg, J.; Hingson, R.; Swartzwelder, S.; Martin, C.; Chung, T.; Tapert, S.F.; Sher, K.; et al. A developmental perspective on alcohol and youths 16 to 20 years of age. Pediatrics 2008, 121 (Suppl. S4), S290–S310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Crews, F.T.; Braun, C.J.; Hoplight, B.; Switzer, R.C.; Knapp, D.J. Binge ethanol consumption causes differential brain damage in young adolescent rats compared with adult rats. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2000, 24, 1712–1723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Baer, J.S.; Kivlahan, D.R.; Blume, A.W.; McKnight, P.; Marlatt, G.A. Brief intervention for heavy-drinking college students, 4-Year follow-up and natural history. Am. J. Public Health 2001, 91, 1310–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Wilsnack, R.W.; Wilsnack, S.C.; Kristjanson, A.F.; Vogeltanz-Holm, N.D.; Gmel, G. Gender and alcohol consumption, Patterns from the multinational GENACIS project. Addiction 2009, 104, 1487–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Slutske, W.S. Alcohol use disorders among US college students and their non-college-attending peers. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 2005, 62, 321–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Dawson, D.A.; Grant, B.F.; Stinson, F.S.; Chou, P.S. Another look at heavy episodic drinking and alcohol use disorders among college and noncollege youth. J. Stud. Alcohol 2004, 65, 477–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Hill, K.G.; White, H.R.; Chung, I.J.; Hawkins, J.D.; Catalano, R.F. Early Adult Outcomes of Adolescent Binge Drinking, Person- and Variable-Centered Analyses of Binge Drinking Trajectories. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2000, 24, 892–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Chassin, L.; Flora, D.B.; King, K.M. Trajectories of alcohol and drug use and dependence from adolescence to adulthood, The effects of familial alcoholism and personality. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 2004, 113, 483–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Wechsler, H.; Nelson, T.F. What we have learned from the Harvard School of Public Health College Alcohol Study, Focusing attention on College Student Alcohol Consumption and the environmental conditions that promote it. J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs 2008, 69, 481–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. O’Brien, M.C.; McCoy, T.P.; Rhodes, S.D.; Wagoner, A.; Wolfson, M. Caffeinated cocktails, Energy drink consumption, high-risk drinking, and alcohol-related consequences among college students. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2008, 15, 453–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Del Boca, F.K.; Darkes, J.; Greenbaum, P.E.; Goldman, M.S. Up Close and Personal, Temporal Variability in the Drinking of Individual College Students during Their First Year. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 2004, 72, 155–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Keyes, K.M.; Grant, B.F.; Hasin, D.S. Evidence for a closing gender gap in alcohol use, abuse, and dependence in the United States population. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008, 93, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Andrews, J.A.; Tildesley, E.; Hops, H.; Li, F. The influence of peers on young adult substance use. Health Psychol. 2002, 21, 349–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Strine, T.W.; Mokdad, A.H.; Dube, S.R.; Balluz, L.S.; Gonzalez, O.; Berry, J.T.; Manderscheid, R.; Kroenke, K. The association of depression and anxiety with obesity and unhealthy behaviors among community-dwelling US adults. Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry 2008, 30, 127–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. O’Keefe, J.H.; Bybee, K.A.; Lavie, C.J. Alcohol and Cardiovascular Health. The Razor-Sharp Double-Edged Sword. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2007, 50, 1009–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Douglas, K.A.; Collins, J.L.; Warren, C.; Kann, L.; Gold, R.; Clayton, S.; Ross, J.G.; Kolbe, L.J. Results from the 1995 national college health risk behavior survey. J. Am. Coll. Health Assoc. 1997, 46, 55–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. White, H.R.; McMorris, B.J.; Catalano, R.F.; Fleming, C.B.; Haggerty, K.P.; Abbott, R.D. Increases in alcohol and marijuana use during the transition out of high school into emerging adulthood: The effects of leaving home, going to college, and high school protective factors. J. Stud. Alcohol. 2006, 67, 810–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Borsari, B.; Murphy, J.G.; Barnett, N.P. Predictors of alcohol use during the first year of college, Implications for prevention. Addict. Behav. 2007, 32, 2062–2086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Squeglia, L.M.; Jacobus, J.; Tapert, S.F. The influence of substance use on adolescent brain development. Clin. EEG Neurosci. 2009, 40, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Holder, H.D.; Gruenewald, P.J.; Ponicki, W.R.; Treno, A.J.; Grube, J.W.; Saltz, R.F.; Voas, R.B.; Reynolds, R.; Davis, J.; Sanchez, L.; et al. Effect of community-based interventions on high-risk drinking and alcohol-related injuries. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2000, 284, 2341–2347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Mohler-Kuo, M.; Dowdall, G.W.; Koss, W.H. Correlates of rape while intoxicated in a national sample of college women. J. Stud. Alcohol 2004, 65, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Zeigler, D.W.; Wang, C.C.; Yoast, R.A.; Dickinson, B.D.; McCaffree, M.A.; Robinowitz, C.B.; Sterling, M.L. The neurocognitive effects of alcohol on adolescents and college students. Prev. Med. 2005, 40, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Muthén, B.O.; Muthén, L.K. The development of heavy drinking and alcohol-related problems from ages 18 to 37 in a U.S. National sample. J. Stud. Alcohol 2000, 61, 290–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Wechsler, H.; Nelson, T.F.; Lee, J.E.; Seibring, M.; Lewis, C.; Keeling, R.P. Perception and reality, A national evaluation of social norms marketing interventions to reduce college students’ heavy alcohol use. J. Stud. Alcohol 2003, 64, 484–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Pitkänen, T.; Lyyra, A.L.; Pulkkinen, L. Age of onset of drinking and the use of alcohol in adulthood, A follow-up study from age 8-42 for females and males. Addiction 2005, 100, 652–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Martens, M.P.; Ferrier, A.G.; Sheehy, M.J.; Corbett, K.; Anderson, D.A.; Simmons, A. Development of the Protective Behavioral Strategies Survey. J. Stud. Alcohol 2005, 66, 698–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Elder, R.W.; Lawrence, B.; Ferguson, A.; Naimi, T.S.; Brewer, R.D.; Chattopadhyay, S.K.; Toomey, T.L.; Fielding, J.E. The Effectiveness of Tax Policy Interventions for Reducing Excessive Alcohol Consumption and Related Harms. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2010, 38, 217–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Patra, J.; Bakker, R.; Irving, H.; Jaddoe, V.; Malini, S.; Rehm, J. Dose-response relationship between alcohol consumption before and during pregnancy and the risks of low birthweight, preterm birth and small for gestational age (SGA)-a systematic review and meta-analyses. BJOG An. Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2011, 118, 1411–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Harris, K.M.; Gordon-Larsen, P.; Chantala, K.; Udry, J.R. Longitudinal trends in race/ethnic disparities in leading health indicators from adolescence to young adulthood. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 2006, 160, 74–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Haines, M.; Spear, S.F. Changing the perception of the norm, A strategy to decrease binge drinking among college students. J. Am. Coll. Health Assoc. 1996, 45, 134–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Chen, W.Y.; Rosner, B.; Hankinson, S.E.; Colditz, G.A.; Willett, W.C. Moderate alcohol consumption during adult life, drinking patterns, and breast cancer risk. JAMA—J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2011, 306, 1884–1890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Jennison, K.M. The short-term effects and unintended long-term consequences of binge drinking in college, A 10-year follow-up study. Am. J. Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2004, 30, 659–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. King, A.C.; De Wit, H.; McNamara, P.J.; Cao, D. Rewarding, stimulant, and sedative alcohol responses and relationship to future binge drinking. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 2011, 68, 389–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Bell, R.L.; Rodd, Z.A.; Lumeng, L.; Murphy, J.M.; McBride, W.J. The alcohol-preferring P rat and animal models of excessive alcohol drinking. Addict. Biol. 2006, 11, 270–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Jaccard, J.; Blanton, H.; Dodge, T. Peer influences on risk behavior, An analysis of the effects of a close friend. Dev. Psychol. 2005, 41, 135–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Agostinelli, G.; Brown, J.M.; Miller, W.R. Effects of normative feedback on consumption among heavy drinking college students. J. Drug Educ. 1995, 25, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Townshend, J.M.; Duka, T. Binge drinking, cognitive performance and mood in a population of young social drinkers. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 2005, 29, 317–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Weitzman, E.R.; Nelson, T.F.; Wechsler, H. Taking up binge drinking in college, The influences of person, social group, and environment. J. Adolesc. Health 2003, 32, 26–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Conrod, P.J.; Stewart, S.H.; Comeau, N.; Maclean, A.M. Efficacy of cognitive-behavioral interventions targeting personality risk factors for youth alcohol misuse. J. Clin. Child. Adolesc. Psychol. 2006, 35, 550–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Johnston, K.L.; White, K.M. Binge-drinking, A test of the role of group norms in the theory of planned behaviour. Psychol. Health 2003, 18, 63–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Wechsler, H.; Lee, J.E.; Nelson, T.F.; Kuo, M. Underage college students’ drinking behavior, access to alcohol, and the influence of deterrence policies, Findings from the harvard school of public health college alcohol study. J. Am. Coll. Health Assoc. 2002, 50, 223–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. White, A.M.; Kraus, C.L.; Swartzwelder, H.S. Many college freshmen drink at levels far beyond the binge threshold. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2006, 30, 1006–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Puddey, I.B.; Rakic, V.; Dimmitt, S.B.; Beilin, L.J. Influence of pattern of drinking on cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular risk factors—A review. Addiction 1999, 94, 649–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Wechsler, H.; Isaac, N. ’Binge’ Drinkers at Massachusetts Colleges, Prevalence, Drinking Style, Time Trends, and Associated Problems. JAMA 1992, 267, 2929–2931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Popova, S.; Rehm, J.; Patra, J.; Zatonski, W. Comparing alcohol consumption in central and eastern Europe to other European countries. Alcohol Alcohol. 2007, 42, 465–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Hingson, R.W.; Zha, W. Age of drinking onset, alcohol use disorders, frequent heavy drinking, and unintentionally injuring oneself and others after drinking. Pediatrics 2009, 123, 1477–1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Nelson, T.F.; Wechsler, H. Alcohol and college athletes. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2001, 33, 43–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Guo, J.; Chung, I.J.; Hill, K.G.; Hawkins, J.D.; Catalano, R.F.; Abbott, R.D. Developmental relationships between adolescent substance use and risky sexual behavior in young adulthood. J. Adolesc. Health 2002, 31, 354–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Ethen, M.K.; Ramadhani, T.A.; Scheuerle, A.E.; Canfield, M.A.; Wyszynski, D.F.; Druschel, C.M.; Romitti, P.A. Alcohol consumption by women before and during pregnancy. Matern. Child Health J. 2009, 13, 274–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Szmigin, I.; Griffin, C.; Mistral, W.; Bengry-Howell, A.; Weale, L.; Hackley, C. Re-framing “binge drinking” as calculated hedonism, Empirical evidence from the UK. Int. J. Drug Policy 2008, 19, 359–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Wood, M.D.; Read, J.P.; Palfai, T.P.; Stevenson, J.F. Social influence processes and college student drinking, The mediational role of alcohol outcome expectancies. J. Stud. Alcohol 2001, 62, 32–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Tucker, J.S.; Ellickson, P.L.; Orlando, M.; Martino, S.C.; Klein, D.J. Substance use Trajectories from Early Adolescence to Emerging Adulthood, A Comparison of Smoking, Binge Drinking, and Marijuana use. J. Drug Issues 2005, 35, 307–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Weitzman, E.R. Poor Mental Health, Depression, and Associations with Alcohol Consumption, Harm, and Abuse in a National Sample of Young Adults in College. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 2004, 192, 269–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Maier, S.E.; West, J.R. Drinking patterns and alcohol-related birth defects. Alcohol Res. Health 2001, 25, 168–174. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  121. Leichliter, J.S.; Meilman, P.W.; Presley, C.A.; Cashin, J.R. Alcohol use and related consequences among students with varying levels of involvement in college athletics. J. Am. Coll. Health Assoc. 1998, 46, 257–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Roerecke, M.; Rehm, J. Irregular heavy drinking occasions and risk of ischemic heart disease, A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2010, 171, 633–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  123. Blazer, D.G.; Wu, L.T. The epidemiology of at-risk and binge drinking among middle-aged and elderly community adults, National survey on drug use and health. Am. J. Psychiatry 2009, 166, 1162–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  124. Viner, R.M.; Taylor, B. Adult outcomes of binge drinking in adolescence, Findings from a UK national birth cohort. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2007, 61, 902–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  125. Gill, J.S. Reported levels of alcohol consumption and binge drinking within the UK undergraduate student population over the last 25 years. Alcohol Alcohol. 2002, 37, 109–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  126. Wechsler, H.; Davenport, A.E.; Dowdall, G.W.; Grossman, S.J.; Zanakos, S.I. Binge drinking, tobacco, and illicit drug use and involvement in college athletics, A survey of students at 140 American colleges. J. Am. Coll. Health Assoc. 1997, 45, 195–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Karam, E.; Kypri, K.; Salamoun, M. Alcohol use among college students, An international perspective. Curr. Opin. Psychiatry 2007, 20, 213–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Bensley, L.S.; Van Eenwyk, J.; Simmons, K.W. Self-reported childhood sexual and physical abuse and adult HIV-risk behaviors and heavy drinking. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2000, 18, 151–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Duncan, G.J.; Wilkerson, B.; England, P. Cleaning up their act, The effects of marriage and cohabitation on licit and illicit drug use. Demography 2006, 43, 691–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Conrod, P.J.; Castellanos, N.; Mackie, C. Personality-targeted interventions delay the growth of adolescent drinking and binge drinking. J. Child. Psychol. Psychiatry. 2008, 49, 181–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Tucker, J.S.; Orlando, M.; Ellickson, P.L. Patterns and correlates of binge drinking trajectories from early adolescence to young adulthood. Health Psychol. 2003, 22, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Pagni, M.; Khan, N.R.; Cohen, H.L.; Choudhri, A.F. Highly cited works in radiology, The top 100 cited articles in radiologic journals. Acad. Radiol. 2014, 21, 1056–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Loomes, D.E.; van Zanten, S.V. Bibliometrics of the Top 100 Clinical Articles in Digestive Disease. Gastroenterology 2013, 144, 673–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Maurage, P.; Lannoy, S.; Mange, J.; Grynberg, D.; Beaunieux, H.; Banovic, I.; Gierski, F.; Naassila, M. What we talk about when we talk about binge drinking, Towards an integrated conceptualization and evaluation. Alcohol Alcohol. 2020, 55, 468–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Aragón, C.; Miquel, M.; Correa, M.; Sanchis-Segura, C. Alcohol y metabolismo humano. Adicciones 2002, 14, 23–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  136. NIAAA. Women and Alcohol. Fact Sheet for Specific Audiences. Fact Sheet. 2019. Available online: https://www.niaaa.nih.gov/sites/default/files/women-and-alcohol-fact-sheet.pdf (accessed on 17 August 2021).
  137. Pettinati, H.M.; Weiss, R.D.; Miller, W.R.; Donovan, D.; Ernst, D.B.; Rounsaville, B.J. Volume 2. Medical Management Treatment Manual, A Clinical Research Guide for Medically Trained Clinicians Providing Pharmacotherapy as Part of the Treatment for Alcohol Dependence; Combine Monograph Series; Publication No. (NIH) 04–5289; DHHS: Bethesda, MD, USA, 2004.
  138. Bakkalbasi, N.; Bauer, K.; Glover, J.; Wang, L. Three options for citation tracking, Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science. Biomed. Digit. Libr. 2006, 3, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Moed, H.F. New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation. Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp. 2009, 57, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Dumont, J.E. The bias of citations. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1989, 14, 327–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Catalini, C.; Lacetera, N.; Oettl, A. The incidence and role of negative citations in science. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 13823–13826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  142. Cavalcanti, D.C.; Prudêncio, R.B.; Pradhan, S.S.; Shah, J.Y.; Pietrobon, R.S. Good to be bad? In Distinguishing between positive and negative citations in scientific impact. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 7–9 November 2011; IEEE Computer Society: Washington, DC, USA, 2011; pp. 156–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijerph 18 09203 g001 550
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram.
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram.
Ijerph 18 09203 g001
Ijerph 18 09203 g002 550
Figure 2. Number of articles and citations.
Figure 2. Number of articles and citations.
Ijerph 18 09203 g002
Ijerph 18 09203 g003 550
Figure 3. Temporal evolution of citations according to the topic of the 100 most-cited papers in BD.
Figure 3. Temporal evolution of citations according to the topic of the 100 most-cited papers in BD.
Ijerph 18 09203 g003
Ijerph 18 09203 g004 550
Figure 4. BD definitions in the top 100 papers.
Figure 4. BD definitions in the top 100 papers.
Ijerph 18 09203 g004
Table
Table 1. The 100 most-cited papers about binge drinking in the WoS.
Table 1. The 100 most-cited papers about binge drinking in the WoS.
RankCitedCitation Density 1Author(s) and Year of PublicationFirst Author’s Institution and CountryType of Article 2
1128049.23Wechsler et al. (1994) [32]Harvard Sch. of Public Health (USA)3
2106459.11Wechsler et al. (2002a) [33]Harvard Sch. of Public Health (USA)6
380744.83O’Malley and Johnston (2002) [34]Univ. of Michigan (USA)6
480253.47Kuntsche et al. (2005) [35]Swiss Inst. for the Prevention of Alcohol and Drug Problems (Switzerland)1
579842.00Borsari and Carey (2001) [36]Syracuse Univ. (USA)1
674837.40Wechsler et al. (2000) [37]Harvard Sch. of Public Health (USA)6
774249.47Hingson et al. (2005) [38]Boston Univ. Sch. of Public Health (USA)6
868040.00Naimi et al. (2003) [39]Centers for Disease, Control and Prevention (USA)6
963728.95Marlatt et al. (1998) [40]Univ. of Washington (USA)6
1058632.56Perkins (2002) [41]Hobart and William Smith Colleges (USA)1
1157744.38Crews et al. (2007) [42]Univ. of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (USA)1
1256931.61Schulenberg and Maggs (2002) [43]Univ. of Michigan (USA)1
1355642.77Miller et al. (2007) [44]Center for Disease Control and Prevention (USA)3
1452958.78Bouchery et al. (2011) [45]Mathematica Policy Research (USA)3
1551420.56Wechsler et al. (1995b) [46]Harvard Sch. of Public Health (USA)3
1651220.48Wechsler et al. (1995a) [47]Harvard Sch. of Public Health (USA)3
1750327.94Chassin et al. (2002) [48]Arizona State Univ. (USA)6
1847836.77Carey et al. (2007) [49]Syracuse Univ. (USA)1
1946321.05Wechsler et al. (1998) [50]Harvard Sch. of Public Health (USA)6
2045722.85Wilsnack et al. (2000) [51]Univ. of North Dakota (USA)3
2144227.63Neighbors et al. (2004) [52]North Dakota State Univ. (USA)6
2243925.82Ham and Hope (2003) [53]Univ. of Nebraska–Lincoln (USA)5
2343924.39Knight et al. (2002) [54]Harvard Medical Sch./Children’s Hosp. (USA)3
2443125.35Bradley et al. (2003) [55]Health Services Research and Development Service (USA)2
2542717.79Schulenberg et al. (1996) [56]Univ. of Michigan (USA)6
2642035.00Jacobson et al. (2008) [57]Naval Health Research Center (USA)6
2741737.91Courtney and Polich (2009) [58]San Diego State Univ. (USA)1
2841531.92Neighbors et al. (2007) [59]Univ. of Washington (USA)3
2941420.70Borsari and Carey (2000) [60]Syracuse Univ. (USA)3
3040821.47Wechsler and Nelson (2001) [61]Harvard Sch. of Public Health (USA)4
3139524.69Kuntsche et al. (2004) [62]Swiss Inst. for the Prevention of Alcohol and Drug Problems (Switzerland)1
3238735.18Crews and Boettiger (2009) [63]Univ. of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (USA)5
3336946.13Chen and Jacobson (2012) [64]Univ. of Chicago (USA)6
3436620.33Fleming et al. (2002) [65]Univ. of Wisconsin–Madison Medical Sch. (USA)6
3536351.86White and Hingson (2013) [66]Duke Univ. Medical Center (USA)1
3636130.08Brown et al. (2008) [67]Univ. of California (USA)5
3735017.50Crews et al. (2000) [68]Univ. of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (USA)3
3833217.47Baer et al. (2001) [69]Univ. of Washington (USA)6
3932829.82Wilsnack et al. (2009) [70]Univ. of North Dakota (USA)3
4031921.27Slutske (2005) [71]Univ. of Missouri–Columbia (USA)3
4131919.94Dawson et al. (2004) [72]U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (USA)3
4231915.95Hill et al. (2000) [73]Univ. of Washington/Rutgers Univ. (USA)6
4331319.56Chassin et al. (2004) [74]Arizona State Univ. (USA)6
4429924.92Wechsler and Nelson (2008) [75]Harvard Sch. of Public Health (USA)6
4529924.92O’Brien et al. (2008) [76]Wake Forest Univ. Sch. of Medicine (USA)3
4629618.50Del Boca et al. (2004) [77]Univ. of South Florida (USA)6
4729524.58Keyes et al. (2008) [78]New York State Psychiatric Inst./Columbia Univ. (USA)6
4828215.67Andrews et al. (2002) [79]Oregon Research Inst. (USA)6
4928123.42Strine et al. (2008) [80]Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (USA)3
5028121.62O’Keefe et al. (2007) [81]Univ. of Missouri–Kansas City Sch. of Medicine (USA)1
5127812.09Douglas et al. (1997) [82]U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (USA)3
5227419.57White et al. (2006) [83]The State Univ. of New Jersey (USA)3
5326520.38Borsari et al. (2007) [84]Brown Univ. (USA)1
5426223.82Squeglia et al. (2009) [85]Univ. of California (USA)5
5525812.90Holder et al. (2000) [86]Pacific Inst. for Research and Evaluation, Berkeley (USA)6
5625716.06Mohler-Kuo et al. (2004) [87]Harvard Sch. of Public Health (USA)3
5725517.00Zeigler et al. (2005) [88]American Medical Association (USA)1
5824812.40Muthén and Muthén (2000) [89]Univ. of California (USA)6
5924614.47Wechsler et al. (2003) [90]Harvard Sch. of Public Health (USA)3
6024416.27Pitkänen et al. (2005) [91]Univ. of Jyväskylä (Finland)6
6124016.00Martens et al. (2005) [92]Univ. at Albany (USA)2
6223823.80Elder et al. (2010) [93]National Center for Health Marketing (USA)1
6323726.33Patra et al. (2011) [94]Centre for Addiction and Mental Health/Univ. of Toronto (Canada)1
6423516.79Harris et al. (2006) [95]The Univ. of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (USA)6
652329.67Haines and Spear (1996) [96]Northern Illinois Univ. (USA)6
6623025.56Chen et al. (2011) [97]Brigham and Women’s Hosp. and Harvard (USA)6
6722514.06Jennison (2004) [98]Univ. of Northern Colorado (USA)6
6822324.78King, et al. (2011) [99] The Univ. of Chicago (USA)3
6922115.79Bell et al. (2006) [100]Indiana Univ. Sch. of Medicine (USA)3
7022014.67Jaccard et al. (2005) [101]Florida International Univ. (USA)3
712158.60Agostinelli et al. (1995) [102]Univ. of New Mexico (USA)3
7221314.20Townshend and Duka (2005) [103]Univ. of Sussex (UK)3
7321212.47Weitzman et al. (2003) [104]Harvard Sch of Public Health (USA)3
7421015.00Conrod et al. (2006) [105]Univ. of London (UK)3
7520912.29Johnston and White (2003) [106]Queensland Univ. of Technology (Australia)6
7620911.61Wechsler et al. (2002b) [107]Harvard Sch. of Public Health (USA)3
7720714.79White et al. (2006) [108]Duke Univ. Medical Center (USA)3
782069.81Puddey et al. (1999) [109]Univ. of Western Australia (Australia)1
792067.36Wechsler and Isaac (1992) [110]Harvard Sch. of Public Health (USA)3
8020515.77Popova et al. (2007) [111]Centre for Addiction and Mental Health/Univ. of Toronto (Canada)3
8120418.55Hingson and Zha (2009) [112]National Inst. on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (USA)6
8220010.53Nelson and Wechsler (2001) [113]Harvard Sch. of Public Health (USA)3
8319811.00Guo et al. (2002) [114]Univ. of Washington (USA)6
8419717.91Ethen et al. (2009) [115]Texas Department of State Health Services (USA)3
8519616.33Szmigin et al. (2008) [116]Univ. of Birmingham (UK)5
8619610.32Wood et al. (2001) [117]Univ. of Rhode Island (USA)3
8719412.93Tucker et al. (2005) [118]The RAND Corporation (USA)6
8819412.13Weitzman (2004) [119]Harvard Sch. of Public Health (USA)3
8919410.21Maier and West (2001) [120]The Texas A&M Univ. System Health Science Center (USA)1
901928.73Leichliter et al. (1998) [121]Southern Illinois Univ. Carbondale (SIUC) (USA)3
9118918.90Roerecke and Rehm (2010) [122]Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (Canada)1
9218917.18Blazer and Wu (2009) [123]Duke Univ. Medical Center (USA)3
9318914.54Viner and Taylor (2007) [124]Univ. College Hosp.6
9418710.39Gill (2002) [125]Queen Margaret Univ. College1
951878.13Wechsler et al. (1997) [126]Harvard Sch. of Public Health (USA)3
9618514.23Karam et al. (2007) [127]St George Hosp. Univ. Medical Center/Balamand Univ./Inst. for Development Research Advocacy and Applied Care (Lebanon)1
971859.25Bensley et al. (2000) [128]Washington State Department of Health (USA)3
9818313.07Duncan et al. (2006) [129]Northwestern Univ. (USA)3
9918115.08Conrod et al. (2008) [130]King’s College (UK)6
10018010.59Tucker et al. (2003) [131]Univ. of California/RAND (USA)6
1 Citation density: mean number of citations per year. 2 Type of article: (1) review: including literature and systematic review, and meta-analysis; (2) instrument validation: including development or validation of a psychometric instrument or scale; (3) cross-sectional study: including questionnaire and follow-up surveys, or interviews; (4) qualitative study or methods for qualitative study; (5) discussion, including discussion of a method or topic; (6) longitudinal study.
Table
Table 2. Authors who contributed to the most papers among the top 100.
Table 2. Authors who contributed to the most papers among the top 100.
AuthorInstitutionFreq.Scopus Index
Henry WechslerDept. of Health and Social Behavior, Harvard Sch. of Public Health, Boston, USA1767
Toben F. NelsonDept. of Health and Social Behavior, Harvard Sch. of Public Health, Boston, USA733
George W. DowdallDept. of Health and Social Behavior, Harvard Sch. of Public Health, Boston, USA/
Dept. of Sociology, St. Joseph’s Univ. Hosp., Philadelphia, USA/
Dept. of Community Health, Brown Univ. Sch. of Medicine, Providence, USA		611
Meichun Kuo /Meichun Mohler-KuoDept. of Health and Social Behavior, Sch. of Public Health, Boston, USA/
Hosp. Boston, USA		524
Robert D. BrewerAnalytic Methods Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia, USA/
National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, USA		441
Andrea E. DavenportDept. of Health and Social Behavior, Harvard Sch. of Public Health, Boston, USA46
Ralph W. HingsonDivision of Epidemiology and Prevention Research, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Bethesda, USA/
Boston Univ. Sch. of Public Health, Center to Prevent Alcohol Problems Among Young People, Boston, USA		454
Jae Eun LeeDept. of Health and Social Behavior, Harvard Sch. of Public Health, Boston, USA/
Univ. of Nevada, Las Vegas, USA		413
Jürgen RehmSocial and Epidemiological Research Dept. (SER), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada/
Research Institute for Public Health and Addiction, Zurich, Switzerland/
Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany/
Dalla Lana Sch. of Public Health, Univ. of Toronto, Canada/
Dept. of Psychiatry, Univ. of Toronto, Canada		4108
Brian E. BorsariCenter for Health and Behavior, Syracuse Univ., New York, USA/
Dept. of Psychology, Syracuse Univ., New York, USA		335
Kate B. CareyCenter for Health and Behavior, Syracuse Univ., New York, USA/
Dept. of Psychology, Syracuse Univ., New York, USA		370
Richard F. CatalanoSocial Development Research Group, Sch. of Social Work, Univ. of Washington, Seattle, USA378
Fulton T. CrewsBowles Center for Alcohol Studies, Univ. of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA/
Department of Pharmacology, Univ. of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA/
Department of Psychiatry, Univ. of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA		368
Gerhard GmelResearch Dept., Swiss Institute for the Prevention of Alcohol and Drug Problems (SIPA), Switzerland/
Alcohol Treatment Center, Lausanne Univ. Hosp., Switzerland		358
Mary E. LarimerDept. of Psychology, Univ. of Washington, USA360
Hang LeeDept. of Health and Social Behavior, Harvard Sch. of Public Health, Boston, USA/
Massachusetts General Hosp., Boston, USA/
Center for Vaccine Research at the Univ. of California, Los Angeles, USA/
Center for Vaccine Research and Dept. of Pediatrics at the Univ. of California, Los Angeles Sch. of Medicine in Torrance, USA		364
Timothy S. NaimiAlcohol Team, Emerging Investigations, and Analytics Methods Research. Centers for Disease, Control and Prevention, USA343
John E. SchulenbergSurvey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA/
Dept. of Psychology, Univ. of Michigan, USA		356
Mark SeibringDept. of Health and Social Behavior. Harvard Sch. of Public Health in Boston, USA38
Elissa R. WeitzmanDept. of Health and Social Behavior, Harvard Sch. of Public Health, Boston, USA326
Table
Table 3. Journals with the most productive areas according to Bradford’s law.
Table 3. Journals with the most productive areas according to Bradford’s law.
Journal Citation Reports (JCR) 2019
JournalFCitationsIF 1Ranking SCIE 2Ranking SSCI 3Founding Year
J. of Studies on Alcohol (n = 12) (until 2006) + J. of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs (n = 2)1453222.44812/20SA16/36SA(1940) 1975/2007
J. of American College Health833731.710-119/263ER
84/171PEOH		1982
JAMA: The J. of the American Medical Association6307445.5403/165MGI-1960
J. of Consulting and Clinical Psychology522924.632-10/31PC1968
Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research514553.0358/20SA-1977
Addiction412346.3432/20SA
15/155PS		2/36SA
11/142PS		1993
American J. of Public Health313586.46413/193PEOH7/171PEOH1971
American J. of Preventive Medicine39524.42024/193PEOH
25/165MGI		9/171PEOH1985
J. of Adolescent Health37793.94530/193PEOH
8/128PD		14/171PEOH
7/77 PD		1971
1 IF: Impact factor according to the JCR Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) and Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) 2019. 2 JCR ranking in the SCIE (SA: substance abuse; MGI: medicine, general and internal; PS: psychiatry; PEOH: public, environmental and occupational health; P: pediatrics). 3 JCR ranking in the SSCI (SA: substance abuse; ER: education and educational research; PEOH: public, environmental and occupational health; PC: psychology, clinical; PS: psychiatry; PD: psychology, developmental).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cortés-Tomás, M.-T.; Giménez-Costa, J.-A.; Martín-del-Río, B.; Gómez-Íñiguez, C.; Solanes-Puchol, Á. Binge Drinking: The Top 100 Cited Papers. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 9203. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179203

AMA Style

Cortés-Tomás M-T, Giménez-Costa J-A, Martín-del-Río B, Gómez-Íñiguez C, Solanes-Puchol Á. Binge Drinking: The Top 100 Cited Papers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(17):9203. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179203

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cortés-Tomás, María-Teresa, José-Antonio Giménez-Costa, Beatriz Martín-del-Río, Consolación Gómez-Íñiguez, and Ángel Solanes-Puchol. 2021. "Binge Drinking: The Top 100 Cited Papers" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 17: 9203. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179203

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop