Association of Peripapillary Retinal Nerve Fibre Layer Thickness with Disability and MRI Findings in Multiple Sclerosis: A Retrospective Single-Centre Cohort Study
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Patient Data Collection
2.2. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Subject Demographic and Clinical Characteristics
3.2. Baseline and Longitudinal Associations of pRNFL Thickness with Disability Measures
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| EDSS | Expanded Disability Status Scale |
| GCL | Ganglion Cell Layer |
| MRI | Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
| MS | Multiple Sclerosis |
| OCT | Optical Coherence Tomography |
| ON | Optic Neuritis |
| pRNFL | Peripapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer |
References
- Gourraud, P.A.; Henry, R.G.; Cree, B.A.C.; Crane, J.C.; Lizee, A.; Olson, M.P.; Santaniello, A.V.; Datta, E.; Zhu, A.H.; Bevan, C.J.; et al. Precision medicine in chronic disease management: The MS BioScreen. Ann. Neurol. 2014, 76, 633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Villoslada, P. Biomarkers for multiple sclerosis. Drug. News Perspect. 2010, 23, 582–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Green, A.J.; McQuaid, S.; Hauser, S.L.; Allen, I.V.; Lyness, R. Ocular pathology in multiple sclerosis: Retinal atrophy and inflammation irrespective of disease duration. Brain 2010, 133, 1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gabilondo, I.; Martínez-Lapiscina, E.H.; Martínez-Heras, E.; Fraga-Pumar, E.; Llufriu, S.; Ortiz, S.; Bullich, S.; Sepulveda, M.; Falcon, C.; Berenguer, J.; et al. Trans-synaptic axonal degeneration in the visual pathway in multiple sclerosis. Ann. Neurol. 2014, 75, 98–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balk, L.J.; Steenwijk, M.D.; Tewarie, P.; Daams, M.; Killestein, J.; Wattjes, M.P.; Vrenken, H.; Barkhof, F.; Polman, C.H.; Uitdehaag, B.M.J.; et al. Bidirectional trans-synaptic axonal degeneration in the visual pathway in multiple sclerosis. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2015, 86, 419–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Britze, J.; Pihl-Jensen, G.; Frederiksen, J.L. Retinal ganglion cell analysis in multiple sclerosis and optic neuritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Neurol. 2017, 264, 1837–1853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Phuljhele, S.; Kedar, S.; Saxena, R. Approach to optic neuritis: An update. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2021, 69, 2266–2276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Abalo-Lojo, J.M.; Treus, A.; Arias, M.; Gómez-Ulla, F.; Gonzalez, F. Longitudinal study of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness changes in a multiple sclerosis patients cohort: A long term 5 year follow-up. Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 2018, 19, 124–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loughran-Fjeldstad, A.S.; Carlson, N.G.; Husebye, C.D.; Cook, L.J.; Rose, J.W. Retinal nerve fiber layer sector-specific compromise in relapsing and remitting multiple sclerosis. eNeurologicalSci 2015, 1, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Al-Mujaini, A.S.; Al-Mujaini, M.S.; Sabt, B.I. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in multiple sclerosis with and without optic neuritis: A four-year follow-up study from Oman. BMC Ophthalmol. 2021, 21, 391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Safwat, H.M.; Mohamed, S.A.; Elsheshiny, A.H. New optical coherence tomography biomarker for diagnosis of acute optic neuritis in multiple sclerosis. Heliyon 2025, 11, e42114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pillay, G.; Ganger, A.; Singh, D.; Bhatia, R.; Sharma, P.; Menon, V.; Saxena, R. Retinal nerve fiber layer and ganglion cell layer changes on optical coherence tomography in early multiple sclerosis and optic neuritis cases. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2018, 66, 114–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oberwahrenbrock, T.; Schippling, S.; Ringelstein, M.; Kaufhold, F.; Zimmermann, H.; Keser, N.; Young, K.L.; Harmel, J.; Hartung, H.-P.; Martin, R.; et al. Retinal Damage in Multiple Sclerosis Disease Subtypes Measured by High-Resolution Optical Coherence Tomography. Mult. Scler. Int. 2012, 2012, 530305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Huang-Link, Y.M.; Fredrikson, M.; Link, H. Benign Multiple Sclerosis is Associated with Reduced Thinning of the Retinal Nerve Fiber and Ganglion Cell Layers in Non-Optic-Neuritis Eyes. J. Clin. Neurol. 2015, 11, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abalo-Lojo, J.M.; Limeres, C.C.; Gómez, M.A.; Baleato-González, S.; Cadarso-Suárez, C.; Capeáns-Tomé, C.; Gonzalez, F. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, brain atrophy, and disability in multiple sclerosis patients. J. Neuro-Ophthalmol. 2014, 34, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ratchford, J.N.; Saidha, S.; Sotirchos, E.S.; Oh, J.A.; Seigo, M.A.; Eckstein, C.; Durbin, M.K.; Oakley, J.D.; Meyer, S.A.; Conger, A.; et al. Active MS is associated with accelerated retinal ganglion cell/inner plexiform layer thinning. Neurology 2013, 80, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saidha, S.; Al-Louzi, O.; Ratchford, J.N.; Bhargava, P.; Oh, J.; Newsome, S.D.; Prince, J.L.; Pham, D.; Roy, S.; van Zijl, P.; et al. Optical Coherence Tomography Reflects Brain Atrophy in Multiple Sclerosis: A Four-Year Study. Ann. Neurol. 2015, 78, 801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Graves, J.; Balcer, L.J. Eye disorders in patients with multiple sclerosis: Natural history and management. Clin. Ophthalmol. 2010, 4, 1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paul, F.; Calabresi, P.A.; Barkhof, F.; Green, A.J.; Kardon, R.; Sastre-Garriga, J.; Schippling, S.; Vermersch, P.; Saidha, S.; Gerendas, B.S.; et al. Optical coherence tomography in multiple sclerosis: A 3-year prospective multicenter study. Ann. Clin. Transl. Neurol. 2021, 8, 2235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Preiningerova, J.L.; Grishko, A.; Sobisek, L.; Andelova, M.; Benova, B.; Kucerova, K.; Havrdova, E.K. Do eyes with and without optic neuritis in multiple sclerosis age equally? Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 2018, 14, 2281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petzold, A.; de Boer, J.F.; Schippling, S.; Vermersch, P.; Kardon, R.; Green, A.; Calabresi, P.A.; Polman, C. Optical coherence tomography in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2010, 9, 921–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bostan, M.; Pîrvulescu, R.; Tiu, C.; Bujor, I.; Popa-Cherecheanu, A. OCT and OCT-A biomarkers in multiple sclerosis—Review. Rom. J. Ophthalmol. 2023, 67, 107–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suh, A.; Hampel, G.; Vinjamuri, A.; Ong, J.; Kamran, S.A.; Waisberg, E.; Paladugu, P.; Zaman, N.; Sarker, P.; Tavakkoli, A.; et al. Oculomics analysis in multiple sclerosis: Current ophthalmic clinical and imaging biomarkers. Eye 2024, 38, 2701–2710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kale, N. Optic neuritis as an early sign of multiple sclerosis. Eye Brain 2016, 8, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vidal-Jordana, A.; Rovira, A.; Calderon, W.; Arrambide, G.; Castilló, J.; Moncho, D.; Rahnama, K.; Collorone, S.; Toosy, A.T.; Ciccarelli, O.; et al. Adding the Optic Nerve in Multiple Sclerosis Diagnostic Criteria: A Longitudinal, Prospective, Multicenter Study. Neurology 2023, 102, e200805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
| Time of Diagnosis | Last Visit | |
|---|---|---|
| Total | Total | |
| EDSS median (range) | 2 (0–6) | 2.5 (0–6) |
| Functional system | ||
| Visual, n (%) | 27 (32.1%) | 26 (30.1%) |
| Pyramidal, n (%) | 64 (76.2%) | 72 (85.7%) |
| Sensory, n (%) | 32 (38.1%) | 35 (41.6%) |
| Brainstem, n (%) | 41 (48.8%) | 52 (61.9%) |
| Cerebellar, n (%) | 40 (47.6%) | 51 (60.7%) |
| Cognitive, n (%) | 6 (7.1%) | 13 (15.5%) |
| Bowel/bladder, n (%) | 6 (7.1%) | 9 (10.7%) |
| Reduced walking distance, n (%) | 4 (4.8%) | 11 (13.1%) |
| Total Patients | ||
|---|---|---|
| OCT performed during follow-up, n (%) | 45 (54.6%) | |
| Patients with history of optic neuritis at baseline, n (%) | Left | Right |
| 4 (4.8%) | 11 (13.1%) | |
| Patients with history of optic neuritis at last visit, n (%) | Left | Right |
| 10 (22.2%) | 3 (6.7%) | |
| Mean pRNFL thickness (µm) at baseline (±SD) | Left | Right |
| 92.77 ± 23.062 | 93.49 ± 13.28 | |
| Mean pRNFL thickness (µm) at last visit (±SD) | Left | Right |
| 86.76 ± 18.788 | 88.87 ± 15.078 | |
| Baseline pRNFL | p-Value | Sex | p-Value | Age | p-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | −0.009 | 0.933 | - | - | 0.057 | 0.592 |
| Age | −0.186 | 0.089 | 0.057 | 0.592 | - | - |
| EDSS at baseline | −0.257 | 0.019 | −0.053 | 0.626 | 0.341 | 0.001 |
| EDSS change | −0.268 | 0.013 | −0.104 | 0.345 | 0.189 | 0.084 |
| Reduced walking distance | 0.011 | 0.923 | 0.129 | 0.234 | 0.198 | 0.068 |
| Visual FS score | −0.056 | 0.613 | 0.199 | 0.066 | −0.242 | 0.025 |
| Pyramidal FS score | −0.352 | 0.001 | 0.004 | 0.969 | 0.235 | 0.030 |
| Sensory FS score | −0.035 | 0.755 | 0.041 | 0.710 | 0.041 | 0.071 |
| Brainstem FS score | 0.011 | 0.918 | −0.134 | 0.218 | 0.099 | 0.364 |
| Cerebellar FS score | −0.185 | 0.092 | −0.002 | 0.988 | 0.121 | 0.269 |
| Cognitive FS score | −0.052 | 0.642 | 0.086 | 0.428 | −0.019 | 0.858 |
| Bowel/bladder FS score | −0.238 | 0.029 | 0.164 | 0.132 | 0.179 | 0.101 |
| EDSS-FS Score | Variable | Coefficient (B) | Standard Error (SE) | p-Value | R2 | Model p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDSS change | pRNFL thickness (µm) | −0.023 | 0.009 | 0.015 | 0.126 | 0.013 |
| Age | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.342 | |||
| Sex | −0.338 | 0.232 | 0.148 | |||
| Walking distance (EDSS-derived measure) | pRNFL thickness (µm) | −0.023 | 0.013 | 0.079 | 0.125 | 0.013 |
| Age | 0.033 | 0.017 | 0.058 | |||
| Sex | −0.461 | 0.317 | 0.149 | |||
| Cerebellar FS score | pRNFL thickness (µm) | −0.016 | 0.006 | 0.007 | 0.100 | 0.037 |
| Age | −0.014 | 0.008 | 0.082 | |||
| Sex | 0.124 | 0.148 | 0.404 | |||
| Bowel/bladder FS score | pRNFL thickness (µm) | −0.004 | 0.004 | 0.267 | 0.105 | 0.031 |
| Age | 0.002 | 0.005 | 0.744 | |||
| Sex | −0.257 | 0.095 | 0.008 |
| EDSS-FS Score | Variable | Coefficient (B) | Standard Error (SE) | p-Value | R2 | Model p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDSS change | Change in pRNFL thickness (µm) | −0.049 | 0.026 | 0.067 | 0.287 | 0.030 |
| Age | 0.001 | 0.017 | 0.935 | |||
| Sex | −0.467 | 0.359 | 0.201 | |||
| Disease course | 1.695 | 1.056 | 0.118 | |||
| Follow-up duration | <0.001 | 0.000 | 0.037 | |||
| Walking distance (EDSS-derived measure) | Change in pRNFL thickness (µm) | 0.007 | 0.016 | 0.673 | 0.595 | <0.001 |
| Age | 0.004 | 0.010 | 0.677 | |||
| Sex | −0.415 | 0.225 | 0.074 | |||
| Disease course | 3.664 | 0.664 | <0.001 | |||
| Sensory FS score | Change in pRNFL thickness (µm) | −0.013 | 0.013 | 0.328 | 0.301 | 0.027 |
| Age | 0.004 | 0.008 | 0.672 | |||
| Sex | −0.256 | 0.190 | 0.186 | |||
| Disease course | −1.262 | 0.535 | 0.024 | |||
| Follow-up duration | <0.001 | 0.000 | 0.034 |
| Lesion Region | Spearman’s ρ Coefficient | Spearman Correlation p-Value | Odds Ratio | 95% Confidence Interval | p-Value (OR) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subcortical | −0.187 | 0.242 | 0.977 | 0.802–1.191 | 0.820 |
| Periventricular | −0.254 | 0.109 | 0.930 | 0.747–1.158 | 0.517 |
| Infratentorial | −0.281 | 0.075 | 0.880 | 0.741–1.046 | 0.147 |
| Spinal cord | −0.140 | 0.383 | 1.017 | 0.857–1.208 | 0.842 |
| Signs of activity | 0.060 | 0.710 | 1.107 | 0.952–1.289 | 0.185 |
| Lesion Region | Spearman’s ρ Coefficient | Spearman Correlation p-Value | Odds Ratio | 95% Confidence Interval | p-Value (OR) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subcortical | −0.075 | 0.499 | 0.830 | 0.633–1.090 | 0.180 |
| Periventricular | 0.216 | 0.049 | 1.381 | 0.837–2.277 | 0.206 |
| Infratentorial | 0.056 | 0.613 | 1.051 | 0.936–1.181 | 0.396 |
| Spinal cord | −0.018 | 0.869 | 0.992 | 0.923–1.065 | 0.818 |
| Signs of activity | 0.078 | 0.481 | 1.029 | 0.971–1.092 | 0.818 |
| Variables | B | SE | p-Value | OR (Exp[B]) | 95% CI (OR) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single OCT pRNFL | −0.052 | 0.023 | 0.023 | 0.95 | [0.91, 0.99] |
| Sex | 0.988 | 0.510 | 0.050 | 2.69 | [1.00, 7.30] |
| Age | 0.013 | 0.025 | 0.596 | 1.01 | [0.96, 1.06] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Published by MDPI on behalf of the Lithuanian University of Health Sciences. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Vienažindytė, I.; Kaikarytė, K.; Danielius, V.; Žygaitė, A.; Liutkevičienė, R.; Balnytė, R. Association of Peripapillary Retinal Nerve Fibre Layer Thickness with Disability and MRI Findings in Multiple Sclerosis: A Retrospective Single-Centre Cohort Study. Medicina 2026, 62, 904. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62050904
Vienažindytė I, Kaikarytė K, Danielius V, Žygaitė A, Liutkevičienė R, Balnytė R. Association of Peripapillary Retinal Nerve Fibre Layer Thickness with Disability and MRI Findings in Multiple Sclerosis: A Retrospective Single-Centre Cohort Study. Medicina. 2026; 62(5):904. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62050904
Chicago/Turabian StyleVienažindytė, Ieva, Kristė Kaikarytė, Vytautas Danielius, Ainė Žygaitė, Rasa Liutkevičienė, and Renata Balnytė. 2026. "Association of Peripapillary Retinal Nerve Fibre Layer Thickness with Disability and MRI Findings in Multiple Sclerosis: A Retrospective Single-Centre Cohort Study" Medicina 62, no. 5: 904. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62050904
APA StyleVienažindytė, I., Kaikarytė, K., Danielius, V., Žygaitė, A., Liutkevičienė, R., & Balnytė, R. (2026). Association of Peripapillary Retinal Nerve Fibre Layer Thickness with Disability and MRI Findings in Multiple Sclerosis: A Retrospective Single-Centre Cohort Study. Medicina, 62(5), 904. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62050904

