Condello, I.; Speziale, G.; Fiore, F.; Nasso, G.
Comparative Analysis of Irrigation Mist and CO2 vs. Direct CO2 Blower in On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Anastomosis: Efficacy, Efficiency, and Fibrillation upon De-Clamping and Micro-Embolic Gas Activity Incidence. Medicina 2024, 60, 2035.
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60122035
AMA Style
Condello I, Speziale G, Fiore F, Nasso G.
Comparative Analysis of Irrigation Mist and CO2 vs. Direct CO2 Blower in On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Anastomosis: Efficacy, Efficiency, and Fibrillation upon De-Clamping and Micro-Embolic Gas Activity Incidence. Medicina. 2024; 60(12):2035.
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60122035
Chicago/Turabian Style
Condello, Ignazio, Giuseppe Speziale, Flavio Fiore, and Giuseppe Nasso.
2024. "Comparative Analysis of Irrigation Mist and CO2 vs. Direct CO2 Blower in On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Anastomosis: Efficacy, Efficiency, and Fibrillation upon De-Clamping and Micro-Embolic Gas Activity Incidence" Medicina 60, no. 12: 2035.
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60122035
APA Style
Condello, I., Speziale, G., Fiore, F., & Nasso, G.
(2024). Comparative Analysis of Irrigation Mist and CO2 vs. Direct CO2 Blower in On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Anastomosis: Efficacy, Efficiency, and Fibrillation upon De-Clamping and Micro-Embolic Gas Activity Incidence. Medicina, 60(12), 2035.
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60122035
