Next Article in Journal
A Rare Case of Orbitocranial Penetrating Injury with Intracranial Wooden Foreign Body Residue
Next Article in Special Issue
Development and Validation of a Difficulty Scoring System for Laparoscopic Liver Resection to Treat Hepatolithiasis
Previous Article in Journal
Clinical Phenotypes of Dual Kidney Transplant Recipients in the United States as Identified through Machine Learning Consensus Clustering
Previous Article in Special Issue
Clinical Characteristics of Symptomatic Cholecystitis in Post-Gastrectomy Patients: 11 Years of Experience in a Single Center
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Kawasaki Disease with Hepatobiliary Manifestations

Medicina 2022, 58(12), 1833; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58121833
by Siti Aisyah Suhaini 1, Abdullah Harith Azidin 1, Chooi San Cheah 1, Wendy Lee Wei Li 1, Mohammad Shukri Khoo 2, Noor Akmal Shareela Ismail 3 and Adli Ali 1,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Medicina 2022, 58(12), 1833; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58121833
Submission received: 4 November 2022 / Revised: 9 December 2022 / Accepted: 9 December 2022 / Published: 12 December 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The KD with atypical presentation always is challenging. It is very important to make diagnosis early due to the need of specialized treatment. The article presents cases of KD with hepatobilary manifestations, so is actual for general practitioners and pediatricians. But I have some remarks:

1. I suggest to expand  the table 1, or to make new table,  including the age of the patient, clinical features and laboratory investigations, time (day) of treatment. It will make the information more clear.

2. Follow-up time. Were your patients monitored or not for liver function? If yes, how long? What data?

3. Aspirin therapy. What doses of aspirin were prescribed in 2 patients with hepatitis and in second patient with hepatomegaly?  How long your patients received high doses of aspirin? Why  the third patient (with gall bladder hydrops) was prescribed high dose of aspirin 30 mg/kg for a long time- 6 weeks?

Author Response

Please see the attachment, thank you.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Reviewer comments

Title

KAWASAKI DISEASE WITH HEPATOBILIARY MANIFESTATIONS

The authors wrote an interesting article about hepatobiliary manifestations of Kawaski Disease. The manuscript is well written .However ,some important points need to be addressed .

·       2

Title: no need to write all letters in capital

·       19

reported their KD patients. English editing is required in the whole manuscript

 

·       22

 Materials and Methods: A total of 6

The number of patients is too low .So ,we can consider this manuscript a case series not a research article .

·       29

 (n=4,67%)

When your sample size is n <20, give the actual numbers, and no percentages.

·       44

papers were published to have a better understanding

English editing is mandatory

·       46

 

It is self-limiting and normally happens among children under 46 5 years old which is diagnosed according to the diagnostic criteria in the American Heart As-47 sociation (AHA) guidelines

Too long distance and difficult to be understood

·       64

The research gap and aim of the study should be written at the end of the introduction section

·       67

atypical hepatobiliary

what is meant by the word atypical .Please give a precise definition

·       72

The study design was not defined

The author did not mention the approval of the study ..where

·       65

The writing of the materials and methods section is immature .the authors should define the inclusion and exclusion criteria precisely

·       85

positive serological investigation

English editing is mandatory

·       87

together with the typical presentations of KD

English editing is mandatory

·       141

Hepatomegaly is one of the hepatobiliary manifestations in KD as out of the 6 KD pa-141 tients there were 3 patients found to have hepatomegaly findings.

The structure of some sentences needs to be revised and edited

218

with hepatobiliary manifestation

English editing

·       The limitations of the study were not mentioned

 

 

 

 

 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment, thank you.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The Results chapter must be improved: the data in the text and table should not repeat itself. If all the data are included in the text , the table is unneccesary. But the data would be more clear if the clinical symptoms of KD and hepatobilary symptoms as well as  all laboratory tests would be included in the table.

References

I noticed that  newest  sources about KD were not mentioned in the article,  for example, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Long Term Management of KD, Circulation, Volume 135, Issue 17, Apr 2017

European consensus-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of KD- the SHARE initiative by de Graeff and al., 2019

and others....

P.S. in two references No 9 and No 22 there is no year mentioned, 46 percent of sources are older then 10 years

Author Response

Please see the attachment, thank you.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript improved greatly after addressing of the comments 

Author Response

We would like to thank and express our appreciation to the reviewer for spending the time to improve our manuscript. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop