Next Article in Journal
Selected Medicinal Plants Used in the Treatment and Management of Tuberculosis and Related Symptoms in South Africa
Previous Article in Journal
Preclinical Efficacy and Safety of an Oncolytic Adenovirus KD01 for the Treatment of Bladder Cancer
Previous Article in Special Issue
A New Trick of Old Dogs: Can Kappa Opioid Receptor Antagonist Properties of Antidepressants Assist in Treating Treatment-Resistant Depression (TRD)?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Intrathecal Morphine Versus Other Techniques for Postoperative Pain Management in the Context of Multimodal Analgesia: A Meta-Analysis

1
School of Medicine and Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK
2
Department of Anesthesia, University Hospital of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
3
Pain and Opioids After Surgery (PANDOS) European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) Research Group, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
4
Aberdeen Centre for Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Health (Epidemiology Group), Institute of Applied Health Sciences and Nutrition, School of Medicine and Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK
5
Department of Anaesthesia, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK
6
IMAGINE UR UM 103, Anaesthesia Critical Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine Division, Nîmes University Hospital, Montpellier University, 30900 Nîmes, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18(4), 512; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18040512
Submission received: 20 February 2025 / Revised: 9 March 2025 / Accepted: 20 March 2025 / Published: 31 March 2025

Abstract

Objective: Intrathecal morphine (ITM) has been administered in recent years to provide postoperative pain control in non-obstetric surgery; however, current research has limited consideration of the recommendations for regular, basic analgesia from clinical guidelines when exploring its efficacy. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare ITM against alternative methods of analgesia in the presence of multimodal analgesia, for reducing pain scores within the first 24 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included postoperative opioid consumption, incidence of opioid-related effects, and time to mobilisation. Methods: Database searches and screening identified 11 trials for inclusion in this review. Pain scores were compared by meta-analysis at 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively at rest and on movement, with sub-analysis of systemic versus regional techniques. Results: The data found no significant difference between ITM and active comparators for reducing pain scores at rest or on movement at any of the time intervals explored. Sub-analysis demonstrated that regional techniques may provide superior analgesia at 24 h at rest (MD = −1.19; 95% CI [−1.73, −0.66], p < 0.001, I2 = 0%) and on movement (MD = 1.27 [0.44, 2.10], p = 0.003, I2 = 0%). Cumulative opioid consumption was reduced in ITM groups (MD = −11.61 [−18.73, −4.50], p = 0.001, I2 = 95%), with significantly increased risk of pruritus (p < 0.001) but not nausea and vomiting (p = 0.93). There was no evidence of respiratory depression. Conclusions: This meta-analysis was unable to demonstrate any significant benefit to postoperative pain relief with the use of ITM but may suggest that it is as a viable option compared to other active modalities. However, this meta-analysis was limited by a low quantity and quality of data from which to draw conclusions and demonstrated high statistical fragility. We believe this highlights a significant gap in the current literature on ITM.
Keywords: intrathecal morphine; multimodal analgesia; postoperative pain intrathecal morphine; multimodal analgesia; postoperative pain

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gibson, A.W.; Cooper, N.E.; Albrecht, E.; Forget, P. Intrathecal Morphine Versus Other Techniques for Postoperative Pain Management in the Context of Multimodal Analgesia: A Meta-Analysis. Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18, 512. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18040512

AMA Style

Gibson AW, Cooper NE, Albrecht E, Forget P. Intrathecal Morphine Versus Other Techniques for Postoperative Pain Management in the Context of Multimodal Analgesia: A Meta-Analysis. Pharmaceuticals. 2025; 18(4):512. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18040512

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gibson, Arron W., Niamh E. Cooper, Eric Albrecht, and Patrice Forget. 2025. "Intrathecal Morphine Versus Other Techniques for Postoperative Pain Management in the Context of Multimodal Analgesia: A Meta-Analysis" Pharmaceuticals 18, no. 4: 512. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18040512

APA Style

Gibson, A. W., Cooper, N. E., Albrecht, E., & Forget, P. (2025). Intrathecal Morphine Versus Other Techniques for Postoperative Pain Management in the Context of Multimodal Analgesia: A Meta-Analysis. Pharmaceuticals, 18(4), 512. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18040512

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop