Next Article in Journal
Dynamic Noise Reduction with Deep Residual Shrinkage Networks for Online Fault Classification
Previous Article in Journal
Augmented Humanity: A Systematic Mapping Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Low-Cost Force Sensors Embedded in Physical Human–Machine Interfaces: Concept, Exemplary Realization on Upper-Body Exoskeleton, and Validation

1
Department of Production Technologies, Institute of Mechatronics, University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
2
Laboratory of Manufacturing Technology, Helmut-Schmidt-University (University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg), 22043 Hamburg, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2022, 22(2), 505; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22020505
Submission received: 7 December 2021 / Revised: 4 January 2022 / Accepted: 5 January 2022 / Published: 10 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Intelligent Sensors)

Abstract

In modern times, the collaboration between humans and machines increasingly rises, combining their respective benefits. The direct physical support causes interaction forces in human–machine interfaces, whereas their form determines both the effectiveness and comfort of the collaboration. However, their correct detection requires various sensor characteristics and remains challenging. Thus, this paper presents a developed low-cost sensor pad working with a silicone capsule and a piezoresistive pressure sensor. Its measurement accuracy is validated in both an isolated testing environment and a laboratory study with four test subjects (gender-balanced), and an application integrated in interfaces of an active upper-body exoskeleton. In the material-testing machine, it becomes apparent that the sensor pad generally features the capability of reliably determining normal forces on its surface until a certain threshold. This is also proven in the real application, where the measurement data of three sensor pads spatially embedded in the exoskeletal interface are compared to the data of an installed multi-axis load cell and a high-resolution flexible pressure map. Here, the consideration of three sensor pads potentially enables detection of exoskeletal support on the upper arm as well as “poor” fit conditions such as uneven pressure distributions that recommend immediate system adjustments for ergonomic improvements.
Keywords: force sensor; pressure sensor; low cost; exoskeleton; wearable robot; human–machine interaction; interaction forces; evaluation; metrological comparison force sensor; pressure sensor; low cost; exoskeleton; wearable robot; human–machine interaction; interaction forces; evaluation; metrological comparison

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hoffmann, N.; Ersoysal, S.; Prokop, G.; Hoefer, M.; Weidner, R. Low-Cost Force Sensors Embedded in Physical Human–Machine Interfaces: Concept, Exemplary Realization on Upper-Body Exoskeleton, and Validation. Sensors 2022, 22, 505. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22020505

AMA Style

Hoffmann N, Ersoysal S, Prokop G, Hoefer M, Weidner R. Low-Cost Force Sensors Embedded in Physical Human–Machine Interfaces: Concept, Exemplary Realization on Upper-Body Exoskeleton, and Validation. Sensors. 2022; 22(2):505. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22020505

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hoffmann, Niclas, Samet Ersoysal, Gilbert Prokop, Matthias Hoefer, and Robert Weidner. 2022. "Low-Cost Force Sensors Embedded in Physical Human–Machine Interfaces: Concept, Exemplary Realization on Upper-Body Exoskeleton, and Validation" Sensors 22, no. 2: 505. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22020505

APA Style

Hoffmann, N., Ersoysal, S., Prokop, G., Hoefer, M., & Weidner, R. (2022). Low-Cost Force Sensors Embedded in Physical Human–Machine Interfaces: Concept, Exemplary Realization on Upper-Body Exoskeleton, and Validation. Sensors, 22(2), 505. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22020505

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop