Next Article in Journal
Day-to-Day Variability and Year-to-Year Reproducibility of Accelerometer-Measured Free-Living Sit-to-Stand Transitions Volume and Intensity among Community-Dwelling Older Adults
Previous Article in Journal
Carrier Diversity Incorporation to Low-Complexity Near-ML Detection for Multicarrier Systems over V2V Radio Channel
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Design of SiC-Doped Piezoresistive Pressure Sensor for High-Temperature Applications

Sensors 2021, 21(18), 6066; https://doi.org/10.3390/s21186066
by Tomasz Wejrzanowski 1,*, Emil Tymicki 2,3, Tomasz Plocinski 1, Janusz Józef Bucki 1 and Teck Leong Tan 4
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3:
Sensors 2021, 21(18), 6066; https://doi.org/10.3390/s21186066
Submission received: 16 August 2021 / Revised: 3 September 2021 / Accepted: 6 September 2021 / Published: 10 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Sensor Materials)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript deals with the in-house developed piezoresistive pressure sensor using the SiC polytypes. It demonstrates in depth material characterisation and also presented the pressure response of the sensor at elevated temperature. As per the paper linked here (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00542-016-3102-1), the change in the sensitivity of Si based pressure sensors were estimated~ 20 % at 200 degC, however in the current manuscript the ~50 % change (Figure 14b, blue curve) in the gauge factor has been presented up to 200 degC (Sensitivity is directly proportional to the gauge factor). Since, the current manuscript utilises the SiC based piezoresistive pressure sensor, it is accepted to have a less temperature sensitivity in the pressure response. I hope the reason can be justified in the modified version of manuscript before accepting for publication.  

Author Response

Please see the attachment (we used following color-coding: in black - main parts of reply, in red - parts of your review, in green fragments of revised version of paper)  

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

 Can write the materials and methods again to be most explicit 
The XRD discussion doesn’t show anything; please, include the reflections and JCPDS for the systems and the different patterns. 
The Raman is a similar situation that does not show the peaks, needs more discussion for all peaks, and includes the difference between systems. 
Include more details about doping and sensing. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment (we used following color-coding: in black - main parts of reply, in red - parts of your review, in green fragments of revised version of paper)

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Dear Authors,

You have provided a truly up-to-date work for the present! I was glad to read and analyze your publication. I had several questions and suggestions, which I described in the file "sensors-1363227 (Review)". I hope for your early reply.

I wish you good luck and success with this and other publications in this journal!

Best wishes,

Reviewer!

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment (we used following color-coding: in black - main parts of reply, in red - parts of your review, in green fragments of revised version of paper)

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop