Next Article in Journal
Autonomous Power Decision for the Grant Free Access MUSA Scheme in the mMTC Scenario
Previous Article in Journal
Microcantilever: Dynamical Response for Mass Sensing and Fluid Characterization
Previous Article in Special Issue
Data Augmentation for Motor Imagery Signal Classification Based on a Hybrid Neural Network
Article

Evaluating the Effect of Stimuli Color and Frequency on SSVEP

1
Departament de Psicobiologia, Facultat de Psicologia, Universitat de València, 46010 València, Spain
2
Instituto de Automática e Informática Industrial, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 València, Spain
3
Facultad de Ingeniería, Ingeniería Mecatrónica, Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga, 680003 Bucaramanga, Colombia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2021, 21(1), 117; https://doi.org/10.3390/s21010117
Received: 29 November 2020 / Revised: 17 December 2020 / Accepted: 23 December 2020 / Published: 27 December 2020
Brain–computer interfaces (BCI) can extract information about the subject’s intentions by registering and processing electroencephalographic (EEG) signals to generate actions on physical systems. Steady-state visual-evoked potentials (SSVEP) are produced when the subject stares at flashing visual stimuli. By means of spectral analysis and by measuring the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of its harmonic contents, the observed stimulus can be identified. Stimulus color matters, and some authors have proposed red because of its ability to capture attention, while others refuse it because it might induce epileptic seizures. Green has also been proposed and it is claimed that white may generate the best signals. Regarding frequency, middle frequencies are claimed to produce the best SNR, although high frequencies have not been thoroughly studied, and might be advantageous due to the lower spontaneous cerebral activity in this frequency band. Here, we show white, red, and green stimuli, at three frequencies: 5 (low), 12 (middle), and 30 (high) Hz to 42 subjects, and compare them in order to find which one can produce the best SNR. We aim to know if the response to white is as strong as the one to red, and also if the response to high frequency is as strong as the one triggered by lower frequencies. Attention has been measured with the Conner’s Continuous Performance Task version 2 (CPT-II) task, in order to search for a potential relationship between attentional capacity and the SNR previously obtained. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) shows the best SNR with the middle frequency, followed by the low, and finally the high one. White gives as good an SNR as red at 12 Hz and so does green at 5 Hz, with no differences at 30 Hz. These results suggest that middle frequencies are preferable and that using the red color can be avoided. Correlation analysis also show a correlation between attention and the SNR at low frequency, so suggesting that for the low frequencies, more attentional capacity leads to better results. View Full-Text
Keywords: brain–computer interface; electroencephalography; biomedical signal processing; SSVEP brain–computer interface; electroencephalography; biomedical signal processing; SSVEP
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Duart, X.; Quiles, E.; Suay, F.; Chio, N.; García, E.; Morant, F. Evaluating the Effect of Stimuli Color and Frequency on SSVEP. Sensors 2021, 21, 117. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21010117

AMA Style

Duart X, Quiles E, Suay F, Chio N, García E, Morant F. Evaluating the Effect of Stimuli Color and Frequency on SSVEP. Sensors. 2021; 21(1):117. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21010117

Chicago/Turabian Style

Duart, Xavier, Eduardo Quiles, Ferran Suay, Nayibe Chio, Emilio García, and Francisco Morant. 2021. "Evaluating the Effect of Stimuli Color and Frequency on SSVEP" Sensors 21, no. 1: 117. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21010117

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop