# Modelling the Influence of Different Soot Types on the Radio-Frequency-Based Load Detection of Gasoline Particulate Filters

^{1}

^{2}

^{3}

^{*}

## Abstract

**:**

^{®}that not only allowed for calculating the loading and regeneration process of GPFs under different engine operating conditions but also determined the impact on both sensor systems. To simulate the regeneration behavior of gasoline soot accurately, an oxidation model was developed. To identify the influence of different engine operating points on the sensor behavior, various samples generated at an engine test bench were examined regarding their kinetic parameters using thermogravimetric analysis. Thus, this compared the accuracy of soot mass determination using the RF sensor with the differential pressure method. By simulating a typical driving condition with incomplete regenerations, the effects of the soot kinetics on sensor accuracy was demonstrated exemplarily. Thereby, the RF sensor showed an overall smaller mass determination error, as well as a lower dependence on the soot kinetics.

## 1. Introduction

_{x}trap (LNT) [27,28]. Thus, it would be possible to monitor GPFs with a TWC coating not only for soot loading but also concurrently for oxygen storage [21].

^{®}5.4 (COMSOL Inc., Stockholm, Sweden) to determine the signals of both sensor systems under different operating conditions. Thereby, the simulation model should not simulate all processes perfectly realistically, but rather help to recognize possible perturbations to the sensor signals. Thus, the here-given simulation model can help to develop methods to eliminate these influences during the processing of the measured signal. As an example, this study showed the effects of the different reaction kinetics of various soot types on the sensor accuracy during incomplete regenerations. Therefore, this simulation model allows for a direct comparison between the accuracy of the two sensor concepts under exactly defined operating conditions.

## 2. Simulation Model Design

#### 2.1. Flow Distribution in GPFs

#### 2.2. Determination of the Filter Temperature

#### 2.3. Soot Storage

#### 2.4. Reaction Kinetics of Soot

_{2}, as well as the incomplete oxidation to CO (Equations (12) and (13)):

_{2}to CO can be expressed using a factor ${f}_{\mathrm{CO}}$ that depends on the temperature and oxygen content in the exhaust gas (Equation (14)):

^{3}/kg·s [52]. For simplicity, the simulations and the corresponding reaction kinetic analyses assume a first-order reaction similar to several models in the literature [50,53]. An implementation of reaction orders different from one would be possible for complete regenerations. On the other hand, in the case of incomplete oxidation and a subsequent loading, a description of the effects by mixed partially regenerated and fresh soot on the reaction order would be necessary. In simulation models for diesel engines, NO

_{2}combustion is also taken into account in some cases [50]. Due to the stoichiometric operation of gasoline engines and the resulting lower number of nitrogen oxides after the TWC, this model does not include that reaction.

#### 2.5. RF Parameter Calculation

^{6}S/m has been assigned to them. The GPF temperature and soot loading are transferred from the soot storage model to the RF-model, whereby no distinction is made between the deep bed and the soot cake. With these two parameters, the location-dependent complex dielectric parameters of the filter ${\epsilon}_{\mathrm{filter}}^{\prime}$ and ${\epsilon}_{\mathrm{filter}}^{\u2033}$ (which correspond to the real and imaginary part, respectively, of a complex relative permittivity $\epsilon ={\epsilon}^{\prime}-\mathrm{j}{\epsilon}^{\u2033}$), averaged over filter substrate, soot, and air, are calculated.

_{111}). To help with modeling the influence of the temperature distribution in the GPF, the dielectric parameters are measured in a wide temperature range from room temperature to 600 °C. Due to too small amounts of real gasoline soot available, it was not possible to determine their permittivity using this method. For this reason, the dielectric properties of PrintexU were used in the simulations regardless of the type of soot. Since the gasoline soot used for the following investigations was deposited on cordierite substrates and the soot kinetics were determined using soot–cordierite mixtures, cordierite was applied as the substrate material in the simulation model.

^{2}that was above 0.98 for both linear approximations. On the other hand, for cordierite, almost constant dielectric parameters were measured over the entire temperature range (${\epsilon}_{\mathrm{substrate}}^{\prime}=7.25$ and ${\epsilon}_{\mathrm{substrate}}^{\u2033}=0.0009$).

^{3}, and for PrintexU, the density was ${\rho}_{\mathrm{soot}}$ = 1060 kg/m

^{3}. The density of the filter ${\rho}_{\mathrm{GPF}}$ was calculated using the mass and volume of the filter.

## 3. Kinetics of Realistic Soot

_{0}to 0.3 m/m

_{0}) to evaluate the parameters. The pre-exponential factor could then be determined using the y-axis intersection for this line, which corresponded to $\mathrm{ln}\left({k}_{\mathrm{c},0}{M}_{\mathrm{c}}\right)$. On the other hand, the negative slope was multiplied by the gas constant R to obtain the activation energy ${E}_{\mathrm{A}}$. This is shown exemplarily for the operating point “120 km/h” in Figure 5. Here, as well as for the other investigated soot types, high linearity of the measured data was found.

## 4. Application of the Model to Driving Cycles

_{111}were considered.

## 5. Conclusions and Outlook

## Author Contributions

## Funding

## Acknowledgments

## Conflicts of Interest

## Abbreviations

a | filter channel width |

cpsi | cells per square inch |

${c}_{\mathrm{CO}}$ | concentration of carbon monoxide |

${c}_{{\mathrm{CO}}_{2}}$ | concentration of carbon dioxide |

${c}_{{\mathrm{O}}_{2}}$ | oxygen concentration in the exhaust gas |

${c}_{\mathrm{p},\mathrm{exhaust}}$ | heat capacity of exhaust gas |

${c}_{\mathrm{soot}}$ | soot concentration in the exhaust gas |

DPF | diesel particulate filter |

${d}_{\mathrm{s}}$ | thickness of soot cake |

${d}_{\mathrm{s},\mathrm{deep}}$ | virtual thickness of soot deposited in deep bed |

${E}_{\mathrm{A}}$ | activation energy for soot oxidation |

F | factor equal to 28.454 |

${f}_{\mathrm{CO}}$ | factor describing the ratio of CO_{2} to CO during soot oxidation |

${f}_{\mathrm{res}}$ | resonant frequency |

GDI | gasoline direct injection |

GPF | gasoline particulate filter |

${\mathit{k}}_{\mathrm{c}}$ | reaction rate constant |

${k}_{\mathrm{c},0}$ | pre-exponential factor |

${M}_{\mathrm{c}}$ | molar mass of carbon |

${m}_{\mathrm{err}}$ | sensor error |

${m}_{\mathrm{soot}}$ | soot mass deposited in the filter |

${m}_{\mathrm{soot},\mathrm{bed}}$ | soot mass collected using deep bed filtration |

${m}_{\mathrm{soot},\mathrm{cake}}$ | soot mass deposited in the soot cake |

${\dot{\mathit{m}}}_{\mathrm{exhaust}}$ | exhaust gas mass flow rate |

${\dot{\mathit{m}}}_{\mathrm{soot},\mathrm{in}}$ | soot mass flow rate into the exhaust gas system |

${\dot{\mathit{m}}}_{\mathrm{soot},\mathrm{exhaust}}$ | soot mass flow through the filter walls |

n | reaction order of the soot oxidation |

${Q}_{\mathbf{0}}$ | quality factor |

${\dot{Q}}_{\mathrm{GPF}}$ | heat flow into GPF caused by the exhaust gas |

R | gas constant |

RF | radio frequency |

TE_{111} | resonance mode in the filter canning |

TGA | thermogravimetric analysis |

${T}_{\mathrm{GPF}}$ | temperature of the GPF substrate |

${T}_{\mathrm{inlet}}$ | gas temperature in the inlet channels |

${T}_{\mathrm{outlet}}$ | gas temperature in the outlet channels |

${v}_{\mathrm{w}}$ | gas velocity through the filter channel walls |

${w}_{\mathrm{s}}$ | thickness of the filter channel walls |

${\alpha}_{\mathrm{cake}}$ | filter penetrability caused by the soot cake |

${\alpha}_{\mathrm{deep}}$ | filter penetrability caused by the deep bed filtration |

${\alpha}_{\mathrm{clean}}$ | filter penetrability without the soot loading |

${\alpha}_{\mathrm{filter}}$ | filter penetrability |

$\Delta p$ | differential pressure |

${\epsilon}_{\mathrm{filter}}^{\prime}$ | real part of the filter permittivity |

${\epsilon}_{\mathrm{filter}}^{\u2033}$ | imaginary part of the filter permittivity |

${\epsilon}_{\mathrm{soot}}^{\prime}$ | real part of the soot permittivity |

${\epsilon}_{\mathrm{soot}}^{\u2033}$ | imaginary part of the soot permittivity |

${\epsilon}_{\mathrm{substrate}}^{\prime}$ | real part of the filter substrate permittivity |

${\epsilon}_{\mathrm{substrate}}^{\u2033}$ | imaginary part of the filter substrate permittivity |

$\eta $ | dynamic viscosity of the exhaust gas |

${\eta}_{\mathrm{bed}}$ | deep bed filtration efficiency |

${\eta}_{\mathrm{cake}}$ | soot cake filtration efficiency |

${\kappa}_{0}$ | filter wall permeability |

${\kappa}_{\mathrm{channel}}$ | filter channel permeability |

${\kappa}_{\mathrm{s}}$ | soot cake permeability |

${\kappa}_{\mathrm{s},\mathrm{deep}}$ | deep bed permeability |

λ | air–fuel ratio |

$\rho $ | exhaust gas density |

${\rho}_{\mathrm{GPF}}$ | filter density |

${\rho}_{\mathrm{soot}}$ | soot density |

${\rho}_{\mathrm{substrate}}$ | filter substrate density |

$\sigma $ | conductivity |

$\varphi $ | fraction of the soot in the deep bed contributing to the soot cake formation |

$\mu $ | magnetic permeability |

## References

- Richter, J.M.; Klingmann, R.; Spiess, S.; Wong, K.-F. Application of Catalyzed Gasoline Particulate Filters to GDI Vehicles. SAE Int. J. Engines
**2012**, 5, 1361–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Demuynck, J.; Favre, C.; Bosteels, D.; Hamje, H.; Andersson, J. Real-World Emissions Measurements of a Gasoline Direct Injection Vehicle without and with a Gasoline Particulate Filter. SAE Tech. Pap.
**2017**. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Lambert, C.; Chanko, T.; Dobson, D.; Liu, X.; Pakko, J. Gasoline Particle Filter Development. Emiss. Control Sci. Technol.
**2017**, 3, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Saito, C.; Nakatani, T.; Miyairi, Y.; Yuuki, K.; Makino, M.; Kurachi, H.; Heuss, W.; Kuki, T.; Furuta, Y.; Kattouah, P.; et al. New Particulate Filter Concept to Reduce Particle Number Emissions. SAE Tech. Pap.
**2011**. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Rose, D.; Boger, T. Different Approaches to Soot Estimation as Key Requirement for DPF Applications. SAE Tech. Pap.
**2009**. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Wang-Hansen, C.; Ericsson, P.; Lundberg, B.; Skoglundh, M.; Carlsson, P.-A.; Andersson, B. Characterization of Particulate Matter from Direct Injected Gasoline Engines. Top. Catal.
**2013**, 56, 446–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Chan, T.W.; Meloche, E.; Kubsh, J.; Rosenblatt, D.; Brezny, R.; Rideout, G. Evaluation of a Gasoline Particulate Filter to Reduce Particle Emissions from a Gasoline Direct Injection Vehicle. SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr.
**2012**, 5, 1277–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Stratakis, G.A.; Psarianos, D.L.; Stamatelos, A.M. Experimental investigation of the pressure drop in porous ceramic diesel particulate filters. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part D
**2002**, 216, 773–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gaiser, G.; Mucha, P. Prediction of Pressure Drop in Diesel Particulate Filters Considering Ash Deposit and Partial Regenerations. SAE Tech. Pap.
**2004**. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Suresh, A.; Khan, A.; Johnson, J.H. An Experimental and Modeling Study of Cordierite Traps - Pressure Drop and Permeability of Clean and Particulate Loaded Traps. SAE Trans.
**2000**, 109, 245–264. [Google Scholar] - Rakovec, N.; Viswanathan, S.; Foster, D.E. Micro-scale Study of DPF Permeability as a Function of PM Loading. SAE Int. J. Engines
**2011**, 4, 913–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Choi, S.; Oh, K.-C.; Lee, C.-B. The effects of filter porosity and flow conditions on soot deposition/oxidation and pressure drop in particulate filters. Energy
**2014**, 77, 327–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Malik, A.; Abdulhamid, H.; Pagels, J.; Rissler, J.; Lindskog, M.; Nilsson, P.; Bjorklund, R.; Jozsa, P.; Visser, J.; Spetz, A.; et al. A Potential Soot Mass Determination Method from Resistivity Measurement of Thermophoretically Deposited Soot. Aerosol Sci. Technol.
**2011**, 45, 284–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Bilby, D.; Kubinski, D.J.; Maricq, M.M. Current amplification in an electrostatic trap by soot dendrite growth and fragmentation: Application to soot sensors. J. Aerosol Sci.
**2016**, 98, 41–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Fischerauer, G.; Förster, M.; Moos, R. Sensing the soot load in automotive diesel particulate filters by microwave methods. Meas. Sci. Technol.
**2010**, 21, 35108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Dietrich, M.; Steiner, C.; Hagen, G.; Moos, R. Radio-Frequency-Based Urea Dosing Control for Diesel Engines with Ammonia SCR Catalysts. SAE Int. J. Engines
**2017**, 10, 1638–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Feulner, M.; Hagen, G.; Hottner, K.; Redel, S.; Müller, A.; Moos, R. Comparative Study of Different Methods for Soot Sensing and Filter Monitoring in Diesel Exhausts. Sensors
**2017**, 17, 400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Feulner, M.; Hagen, G.; Piontkowski, A.; Müller, A.; Fischerauer, G.; Brüggemann, D.; Moos, R. In-Operation Monitoring of the Soot Load of Diesel Particulate Filters: Initial Tests. Top. Catal.
**2013**, 56, 483–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Sappok, A.; Bromberg, L. Radio Frequency Diesel Particulate Filter Soot and Ash Level Sensors: Enabling Adaptive Controls for Heavy-Duty Diesel Applications. SAE Int. J. Commer. Veh.
**2014**, 7, 468–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Sappok, A.; Bromberg, L.; Parks, J.E.; Prikhodko, V. Loading and Regeneration Analysis of a Diesel Particulate Filter with a Radio Frequency-Based Sensor. SAE Tech. Pap.
**2010**. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Dietrich, M.; Jahn, C.; Lanzerath, P.; Moos, R. Microwave-Based Oxidation State and Soot Loading Determination on Gasoline Particulate Filters with Three-Way Catalyst Coating for Homogenously Operated Gasoline Engines. Sensors
**2015**, 15, 21971–21988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version] - Moos, R. Microwave-Based Catalyst State Diagnosis - State of the Art and Future Perspectives. SAE Int. J. Engines
**2015**, 8, 1240–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Beulertz, G.; Votsmeier, M.; Moos, R. In operando Detection of Three-Way Catalyst Aging by a Microwave-Based Method: Initial Studies. Appl. Sci.
**2015**, 5, 174–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Steiner, C.; Malashchuk, V.; Kubinski, D.; Hagen, G.; Moos, R. Catalyst State Diagnosis of Three-Way Catalytic Converters Using Different Resonance Parameters—A Microwave Cavity Perturbation Study. Sensors
**2019**, 19, 3559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Dietrich, M.; Hagen, G.; Reitmeier, W.; Burger, K.; Hien, M.; Grass, P.; Kubinski, D.; Visser, J.; Moos, R. Radio-Frequency-Controlled Urea Dosing for NH₃-SCR Catalysts: NH₃ Storage Influence to Catalyst Performance under Transient Conditions. Sensors
**2017**, 17, 2746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Moos, R.; Rauch, D.; Votsmeier, M.; Kubinski, D. Review on Radio Frequency Based Monitoring of SCR and Three Way Catalysts. Top. Catal.
**2016**, 59, 961–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Walter, S.; Ruwisch, L.; Göbel, U.; Hagen, G.; Moos, R. Radio Frequency-Based Determination of the Oxygen and the NO
_{x}Storage Level of NO_{x}Storage Catalysts. Top. Catal.**2019**, 62, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Fremerey, P.; Reiß, S.; Geupel, A.; Fischerauer, G.; Moos, R. Determination of the NO
_{x}Loading of an Automotive Lean NO_{x}Trap by Directly Monitoring the Electrical Properties of the Catalyst Material Itself. Sensors**2011**, 11, 8261–8280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - La Rocca, A.; Bonatesta, F.; Fay, M.W.; Campanella, F. Characterisation of soot in oil from a gasoline direct injection engine using Transmission Electron Microscopy. Tribol. Int.
**2015**, 86, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Luo, Y.; Zhu, L.; Fang, J.; Zhuang, Z.; Guan, C.; Xia, C.; Xie, X.; Huang, Z. Size distribution, chemical composition and oxidation reactivity of particulate matter from gasoline direct injection (GDI) engine fueled with ethanol-gasoline fuel. Appl. Therm. Eng.
**2015**, 89, 647–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Dietrich, M.; Hagen, G.; Moos, R. Modelling Both the NH
_{3}Storage on Automotive SCR Catalysts and the Radio-Frequency-Based Response. Top. Catal.**2019**, 62, 172–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Konstandopoulos, A.G.; Kostoglou, M.; Skaperdas, E.; Papaioannou, E.; Zarvalis, D.; Kladopoulou, E. Fundamental Studies of Diesel Particulate Filters: Transient Loading, Regeneration and Aging. SAE Tech. Pap.
**2000**, 109, 683–705. [Google Scholar] - Reference Manual; COMSOL Multiphysics® v. 5.4: Stockholm, Sweden, 2018.
- Scheidegger, A.E. The Physics of Flow through Porous Media, 3rd ed.; University of Toronto Press: Toronto, ON, Canada, 1974. [Google Scholar]
- Bissett, E.J. Mathematical model of the thermal regeneration of a wall-flow monolith diesel particulate filter. Chem. Eng. Sci.
**1984**, 39, 1233–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Konstandopoulos, A.G.; Johnson, J.H. Wall-Flow Diesel Particulate Filters—Their Pressure Drop and Collection Efficiency. SAE Tech. Pap.
**1989**, 890405. [Google Scholar] - Tsinoglou, D.N.; Koltsakis, G.C.; Missirlis, D.K.; Yakinthos, K.J. Transient modelling of flow distribution in automotive catalytic converters. Appl. Math. Model.
**2004**, 28, 775–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Aleksandrova, S.; Saul, J.; Prantoni, M.; Medina, H.; Garcia-Afonso, O.; Bevan, M.; Benjamin, S. Turbulent Flow Pressure Losses in Gasoline Particulate Filters. SAE Int. J. Engines
**2019**, 12, 455–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Peiyi, W.; Little, W.A. Measurement of friction factors for the flow of gases in very fine channels used for microminiature Joule-Thomson refrigerators. Cryogenics
**1983**, 23, 273–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Asadi, M.; Xie, G.; Sunden, B. A review of heat transfer and pressure drop characteristics of single and two-phase microchannels. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
**2014**, 79, 34–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Heat Transfer Module User’s Guide; COMSOL Multiphysics® v. 5.4: Stockholm, Sweden, 2018.
- McBride, B.J.; Gordon, S.; Reno, M.A. Coefficients for Calculating Thermodynamic and Transport Properties of Individual Species; National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Office of Management, Scientific and Technical Information Program: Washington, DC, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Bensaid, S.; Marchisio, D.L.; Fino, D.; Saracco, G.; Specchia, V. Modelling of diesel particulate filtration in wall-flow traps. Chem. Eng. J.
**2009**, 154, 211–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Lupše, J.; Campolo, M.; Soldati, A. Modelling soot deposition and monolith regeneration for optimal design of automotive DPFs. Chem. Eng. Sci.
**2016**, 151, 36–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Tandon, P.; Heibel, A.; Whitmore, J.; Kekre, N.; Chithapragada, K. Measurement and prediction of filtration efficiency evolution of soot loaded diesel particulate filters. Chem. Eng. Sci.
**2010**, 65, 4751–4760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zhong, D.; He, S.; Tandon, P.; Moreno, M.; Boger, T. Measurement and Prediction of Filtration Efficiency Evolution of Soot Loaded Diesel Particulate Filters. SAE Tech. Pap.
**2012**. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Lao, C.T.; Akroyd, J.; Eaves, N.; Smith, A.; Morgan, N.; Bhave, A.; Kraft, M. Modelling particle mass and particle number emissions during the active regeneration of diesel particulate filters. Proc. Combust. Inst.
**2019**, 37, 4831–4838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Chiavola, O.; Chiatti, G.; Sirhan, N. Impact of Particulate Size During Deep Loading on DPF Management. Appl. Sci.
**2019**, 9, 3075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Tognotti, L.; Longwell, J.P.; Sarofim, A.F. The products of the high temperature oxidation of a single char particle in an electrodynamic balance. Symp. (Int.) Combust.
**1990**, 23, 1207–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Tartakovsky, L.; Aronov, B.; Zvirin, Y. Modeling of the Regeneration Processes in Diesel Particulate Filters. Energy Power
**2012**, 2, 96–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Choi, S.; Seong, H. Oxidation characteristics of gasoline direct-injection (GDI) engine soot: Catalytic effects of ash and modified kinetic correlation. Combust. Flame
**2015**, 162, 2371–2389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Jess, A.; Wasserscheid, P. Chemical Technology: An Integral Textbook; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Nicolin, P.; Rose, D.; Kunath, F.; Boger, T. Modeling of the Soot Oxidation in Gasoline Particulate Filters. SAE Int. J. Engines
**2015**, 8, 1253–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - RF Module User’s Guide; COMSOL Multiphysics® v. 5.4: Stockholm, Sweden, 2018.
- Dietrich, M.; Rauch, D.; Porch, A.; Moos, R. A Laboratory Test Setup for in Situ Measurements of the Dielectric Properties of Catalyst Powder Samples under Reaction Conditions by Microwave Cavity Perturbation: Set up and Initial Tests. Sensors
**2014**, 14, 16856–16868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]

**Figure 1.**Schematic layout of the simulation model. The wire screens are used to exactly define the cavity resonator in the radio-frequency (RF) simulation.

**Figure 2.**Schematic structure of an inlet (left) and an outlet filter channel (right) with width $a$, wall thickness ${w}_{\mathrm{s}}$, and soot cake thickness in the inlet channel ${d}_{\mathrm{s}}$ (adapted from Konstandopoulos et al. [32]).

**Figure 3.**Measured dielectric parameters of PrintexU (left: ${\epsilon}_{\mathrm{soot}}^{\prime}$; right: ${\epsilon}_{\mathrm{soot}}^{\u2033}$) from 20 °C to 600 °C.

**Figure 4.**Soot oxidation measured using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) with a heating rate of 5 K/min for different soot types.

**Figure 5.**The oxidation rate of the “120 km/h, λ < 1” operation point of the temperature at a heating rate of 5 K/min in an Arrhenius plot with $n$ = 1. The dotted red line corresponds to a linear fit in a range of 10% to 70% mass conversion (marked in grey), The slope correlates with the activation energy, while the y-axis intersection point is equal to the logarithm of the reaction rate.

**Figure 6.**The reaction rate constant ${k}_{\mathrm{c}}$ as a function of the inverse temperature for different soot types.

**Figure 7.**Stored soot mass with the “120 km/h, λ = 1” soot. After reaching 1 g/L, regeneration (marked in red) was initiated by adding 2 vol.% O

_{2}until 0.5 g/L remained on the filter. After the third loading, permanent lean exhaust gas was present.

**Figure 8.**Sensor signals of the differential pressure sensor (Δp) and the RF sensor ($|{\Delta f}_{\mathrm{res}}/{f}_{\mathrm{res},0}|$ and 1000/${Q}_{0}$) as a function of the stored soot mass. The regeneration phases are marked in red.

**Figure 9.**Sensor error in g/L as a function of the stored soot mass in the pressure differential sensor and the RF sensor based on ${f}_{\mathrm{res}}$ relative to ${Q}_{0}$. The regeneration phases are marked in red.

**Figure 10.**The proportional error of the Δp and the RF sensors (evaluation of the resonant mode TE

_{111}) after the end of the first regeneration.

Soot Type | ${\mathit{E}}_{\mathbf{A}}$ (kJ/mol) | ${\mathit{k}}_{\mathbf{c},0}$ (m^{3}·kg^{−1}·s^{−1}) |
---|---|---|

120 km/h, λ = 1 | 232.6 | $1.2\times {10}^{14}$ |

160 km/h, λ = 1 | 239.8 | $3.9\times {10}^{14}$ |

120 km/h, λ < 1 | 206.7 | $9.7\times {10}^{11}$ |

160 km/h, λ < 1 | 211.7 | $2.5\times {10}^{12}$ |

2 g/L PrintexU | 271.9 | $1.7\times {10}^{15}$ |

© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Walter, S.; Schwanzer, P.; Hagen, G.; Haft, G.; Rabl, H.-P.; Dietrich, M.; Moos, R.
Modelling the Influence of Different Soot Types on the Radio-Frequency-Based Load Detection of Gasoline Particulate Filters. *Sensors* **2020**, *20*, 2659.
https://doi.org/10.3390/s20092659

**AMA Style**

Walter S, Schwanzer P, Hagen G, Haft G, Rabl H-P, Dietrich M, Moos R.
Modelling the Influence of Different Soot Types on the Radio-Frequency-Based Load Detection of Gasoline Particulate Filters. *Sensors*. 2020; 20(9):2659.
https://doi.org/10.3390/s20092659

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Walter, Stefanie, Peter Schwanzer, Gunter Hagen, Gerhard Haft, Hans-Peter Rabl, Markus Dietrich, and Ralf Moos.
2020. "Modelling the Influence of Different Soot Types on the Radio-Frequency-Based Load Detection of Gasoline Particulate Filters" *Sensors* 20, no. 9: 2659.
https://doi.org/10.3390/s20092659