Next Article in Journal
Molecular Assembly of a Durable HRP-AuNPs/PEDOT:BSA/Pt Biosensor with Detailed Characterizations
Previous Article in Journal
Functionalized Fiber End Superstructure Fiber Bragg Grating Refractive Index Sensor for Heavy Metal Ion Detection
Open AccessArticle

Suitability of Inexpensive Eye-Tracking Device for User Experience Evaluations

Faculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2018, 18(6), 1822; https://doi.org/10.3390/s18061822
Received: 12 April 2018 / Revised: 14 May 2018 / Accepted: 31 May 2018 / Published: 5 June 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Physical Sensors)
We present the results of a study evaluating the suitability of an inexpensive eye-tracking device for the enhancement of user experience evaluations. Ensuring a comfortable user experience is an important part of the mobile application design process. Evaluation of user experience is usually done through questionnaires and interviews, but it can be improved using eye tracking sensors for user experience studies. We conducted a user experience study of DriveGreen, a mobile application devoted to ecodriving for a transition to a low-carbon society. We used an inexpensive eye-tracking device in addition to standard User Experience Questionnaire and Single Ease Question questionnaires. The results show that the inexpensive eye-tracking device data correlate with data from User Experience Questionnaire and Single Ease Question questionnaires and interviews with users. We conclude that an enhancement of user experience evaluations with inexpensive eye-tracking device is possible. View Full-Text
Keywords: user experience; eye tracking; DriveGreen; user study; user interface; the Eye Tribe; Ogama user experience; eye tracking; DriveGreen; user study; user interface; the Eye Tribe; Ogama
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Burger, G.; Guna, J.; Pogačnik, M. Suitability of Inexpensive Eye-Tracking Device for User Experience Evaluations. Sensors 2018, 18, 1822.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop