Next Article in Journal
Time-Frequency Analysis of Non-Stationary Biological Signals with Sparse Linear Regression Based Fourier Linear Combiner
Next Article in Special Issue
Spatial Indexing for Data Searching in Mobile Sensing Environments
Previous Article in Journal
Major Depression Detection from EEG Signals Using Kernel Eigen-Filter-Bank Common Spatial Patterns
Previous Article in Special Issue
QuickCash: Secure Transfer Payment Systems
Review

Tracking the Evolution of the Internet of Things Concept Across Different Application Domains

1
Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California. Blvd. Benito Juárez S/N, Col. Insurgentes Este. Mexicali 21270, Mexico
2
Instituto de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California. Calle de la Normal S/N, Col. Insurgentes Este. Mexicali 21270, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Yunchuan Sun, Zhipeng Cai and Antonio Jara
Sensors 2017, 17(6), 1379; https://doi.org/10.3390/s17061379
Received: 25 April 2017 / Revised: 5 June 2017 / Accepted: 7 June 2017 / Published: 14 June 2017
Both the idea and technology for connecting sensors and actuators to a network to remotely monitor and control physical systems have been known for many years and developed accordingly. However, a little more than a decade ago the concept of the Internet of Things (IoT) was coined and used to integrate such approaches into a common framework. Technology has been constantly evolving and so has the concept of the Internet of Things, incorporating new terminology appropriate to technological advances and different application domains. This paper presents the changes that the IoT has undertaken since its conception and research on how technological advances have shaped it and fostered the arising of derived names suitable to specific domains. A two-step literature review through major publishers and indexing databases was conducted; first by searching for proposals on the Internet of Things concept and analyzing them to find similarities, differences, and technological features that allow us to create a timeline showing its development; in the second step the most mentioned names given to the IoT for specific domains, as well as closely related concepts were identified and briefly analyzed. The study confirms the claim that a consensus on the IoT definition has not yet been reached, as enabling technology keeps evolving and new application domains are being proposed. However, recent changes have been relatively moderated, and its variations on application domains are clearly differentiated, with data and data technologies playing an important role in the IoT landscape. View Full-Text
Keywords: Internet of Things; definition; things capabilities; application domains Internet of Things; definition; things capabilities; application domains
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Ibarra-Esquer, J.E.; González-Navarro, F.F.; Flores-Rios, B.L.; Burtseva, L.; Astorga-Vargas, M.A. Tracking the Evolution of the Internet of Things Concept Across Different Application Domains. Sensors 2017, 17, 1379. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17061379

AMA Style

Ibarra-Esquer JE, González-Navarro FF, Flores-Rios BL, Burtseva L, Astorga-Vargas MA. Tracking the Evolution of the Internet of Things Concept Across Different Application Domains. Sensors. 2017; 17(6):1379. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17061379

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ibarra-Esquer, Jorge E., Félix F. González-Navarro, Brenda L. Flores-Rios, Larysa Burtseva, and María A. Astorga-Vargas. 2017. "Tracking the Evolution of the Internet of Things Concept Across Different Application Domains" Sensors 17, no. 6: 1379. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17061379

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop