# Improved Omnidirectional Odometry for a View-Based Mapping Approach

^{1}

^{2}

^{3}

^{*}

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

- Adaption of the epipolar constraint to the reference system of an omnidirectional camera sensor.
- Propagation of the current uncertainty to produce an improved adaptive matching process.
- Reliable approach to motion recovery with several variants aiming at the improvement of performance.
- Fusion into a dual view-based SLAM system, as the main prior input in detriment of the internal odometry.

## 2. Visual Odometry

#### 2.1. Epipolar Geometry

#### 2.2. Motion Recovery

#### 2.3. Adaptive Matching

- Prediction$$\begin{array}{c}\hfill {\widehat{x}}_{t+1|t}=f({\widehat{x}}_{t|t},{u}_{t})\end{array}$$$$\begin{array}{c}\hfill {\widehat{z}}_{t+1|t}=h({\widehat{x}}_{t+1|t},{x}_{i})\end{array}$$$$\begin{array}{c}\hfill {P}_{t+1|t}=\frac{\partial {f}_{t|t}}{\partial x}{P}_{t|t}{\frac{\partial {f}_{t|t}}{\partial x}}^{T}+{Q}_{t}\end{array}$$
- Innovation$${v}_{t+1}={z}_{t+1}-{\widehat{z}}_{t+1|t}$$$${S}_{t+1}=\frac{\partial {h}_{t|t}}{\partial x}{P}_{t+1|t}{\frac{\partial {h}_{t|t}}{\partial x}}^{T}+{R}_{t+1}$$
- Update$${\widehat{x}}_{t+1|t+1}={\widehat{x}}_{t+1|t}+{K}_{t+1}{v}_{t+1}$$$${P}_{t+1|t+1}={P}_{t+1|t}-{K}_{t+1}{S}_{t+1}{K}_{t+1}^{T}$$$${K}_{t+1}={P}_{t+1|t}{H}_{t}^{T}{S}_{t+1}^{-1}$$
- ${f}_{t}$: relation between the control input and the current state.
- ${u}_{t}$: control input as the initial seed for the prediction.
- ${h}_{t}$: relation between the observation and the current state.
- $\frac{\partial {f}_{t|t}}{\partial x}$: jacobian of ${f}_{t}$ evaluated at the corresponding state.
- $\frac{\partial {h}_{t|t}}{\partial x}$: jacobian of ${h}_{t}$ evaluated at the corresponding state.
- ${P}_{t}$: covariance of the current uncertainty of the state.
- ${R}_{t}$: covariance of the gaussian noise generated by the camera sensor.
- ${Q}_{t}$: covariance of the gaussian noise generated by the internal odometers.
- ${K}_{t}$: gain matrix of the filter which plays the role of weighting.

## 3. View-Based SLAM

- (i) initialization of views in the map.
- ($ii$) observation model measurement.
- ($iii$) data association.

#### 3.1. View Initialization

#### 3.2. Observation Model

- (i) feature points, p and ${p}^{\prime}$ are extracted from the omnidirectional images ${I}_{1}$ and ${I}_{2}$.
- ($iii$) ultimately, they produce the single solution, as the observation measurement (β,$\varphi $).

#### 3.3. Data Association

Algorithm 1 Data Association |

Require: Inputs${x}_{{n}_{i}}$ ∈ ${x}_{v}(t)$ ∀ n, where ${x}_{v}(t)$=[${x}_{r}$, ${x}_{{n}_{1}}$, ${x}_{{n}_{2}}$, … ${x}_{{n}_{N}}$] $Can$: Set of candidate views within range. $Dassoc$: Views maximizing similarity ratio A. ${d}_{max}$: Maximum range. ${p}_{1}$: feature points on robot’s image at ${x}_{r}$. ${p}_{2}$: feature points on view ${x}_{n}$. for i=1:N do${D}_{{n}_{i}}=\left|\right|{({x}_{r}-{x}_{{n}_{i}})}^{T}({x}_{r}-{x}_{{n}_{i}})\left|\right|$ if ${D}_{{n}_{i}}$<${d}_{max}$ thenNew candidate to the subset: $Can$=[${x}_{{n}_{3}}$, ${x}_{{n}_{6}}$, …, ${x}_{{n}_{j}}$] end ifend forfor j=1:length($Can$) doExtracting ${p}_{2}$ on ${x}_{{n}_{j}}$ ∈ $Can$ if ${A}_{j}$=k $\frac{c}{{p}_{1}+{p}_{2}}=max$ then$Dassoc$=[${x}_{{n}_{j}}$] end ifend forreturn $Dassoc$ |

## 4. Results

#### 4.1. Omndirectional Odometry

#### Dataset 1

#### 4.2. Performance: Accuracy

#### 4.2.1. Solver 1

#### 4.2.2. Solver 2

#### 4.2.3. Solver 3

#### 4.3. Performance: Time Consumption

#### 4.4. SLAM Results

#### 4.4.1. Dataset 2

#### 4.4.2. Dataset 3

## 5. Discussion

- (i) Better results are obtained at any solver case with higher number of matched points considered in order to compute the motion recovery. This implies a considerable increase on the computation time, which may become inviable.
- ($ii$) Particularly, Solver 2 and Solver 3 are liable to require such time efforts, as observed in Figure 17. Despite this fact they provide useful outcomes in order to mitigate false positives.
- ($iii$) Overall, a well devised tradeoff solution may be reached, depending on the final application. Solver 1 may provide sufficient accuracy at a low time consumption, for time demanding applications. The other two solver proposals can be advantageous under cases where the real need is to avoid false imparity, regardless the time consumed.

## 6. Conclusions

## Acknowledgments

## Author Contributions

## Conflicts of Interest

## Abbreviations

SLAM | Simultaneous Localization and Mapping |

EKF | Extended Kalman Filter |

SVD | Single Value Decomposition |

RMSE | Root Mean Squar Error |

## References

- Borenstein, J.; Feng, L. Measurement and correction of systematic odometry errors in mobile robots. IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom.
**1996**, 12, 869–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Fox, D.; Burgard, W.; Thrun, S. Markov Localization for Mobile Robots in Dynamic Environments. J. Artif. Intell. Res.
**1999**, 11, 391–427. [Google Scholar] - Martinelli, A. A possible strategy to evaluate the odometry error of a mobile robot. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Maui, HI, USA, 29 October–3 November 2001; Volume 4, pp. 1946–1951.
- Martinelli, A. The odometry error of a mobile robot with a synchronous drive system. IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom.
**2002**, 18, 399–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Krivi, S.; Mrzi, A.; Velagi, J.; Osmi, N. Optimization based algorithm for correction of systematic odometry errors of mobile robot. In Proceedings of the 9th Asian Control Conference (ASCC), Istanbul, Turkey, 23–26 June 2013; pp. 1–6.
- Xu, H.; Collins, J.J. Estimating the Odometry Error of a Mobile Robot by Neural Networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA), Miami Beach, FL, USA, 13–15 December 2009; pp. 378–385.
- Yu, J.; Park, S.S.; Hyun, W.K.; Choi, H.Y. A correction system of odometry error for simultaneous map building based on sensor fusion. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Smart Manufacturing Application (ICSMA), Goyang-si, Korea, 9–11 April 2008; pp. 393–396.
- Ndjeng, A.N.; Gruyer, D.; Glaser, S.; Lambert, A. Low cost IMU-Odometer-GPS ego localization for unusual maneuvers. Inf. Fusion
**2011**, 12, 264–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Agrawal, M.; Konolige, K. Real-time Localization in Outdoor Environments using Stereo Vision and Inexpensive GPS. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), Hong Kong, China, 20–24 August 2006; pp. 1063–1068.
- Golban, C.; Cobarzan, P.; Nedevschi, S. Direct formulas for stereo-based visual odometry error modeling. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Computer Communication and Processing (ICCP), Cluj-Napoca, Romania, 3–5 September 2015; pp. 197–202.
- Nister, D.; Naroditsky, O.; Bergen, J. Visual odometry. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Washington, DC, USA, 27 June–2 July 2004; Volume 1, pp. 652–659.
- Usenko, V.; Engel, J.; Stuckler, J.; Cremers, D. Direct visual-inertial odometry with stereo cameras. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Stockholm, Sweden, 16–21 May 2016; pp. 1885–1892.
- Engel, J.; Cremers, D. Scale-aware navigation of a lowcost quadrocopter with a monocular camera. Robot. Auton. Syst.
**2014**, 62, 1646–1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Nister, D. Preemptive RANSAC for live structure and motion estimation. Mach. Vis. Appl.
**2005**, 16, 321–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Nister, D.; Naroditsky, O.; Bergen, J. Visual odometry for ground vehicle applications. J. Field Robot.
**2006**, 23, 3–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Corke, P.; Strelow, D.; Singh, S. Omnidirectional visual odometry for a planetary rover. In Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Sendai, Japan, 28 September–2 October 2004; Volume 4, pp. 4007–4012.
- Scaramuzza, D.; Fraundorfer, F.; Siegwart, R. Real-Time Monocular Visual Odometry for On-Road Vehicles with 1-Point RANSAC. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation (ICRA), Kobe, Japan, 12–17 May 2009; pp. 4293–4299.
- Tardif, J.P.; Pavlidis, Y.; Daniilidis, K. Monocular visual odometry in urban environments using an omnidirectional camera. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Nice, France, 22–26 September 2008; pp. 2531–2538.
- Scaramuzza, D.; Siegwart, R. Appearance-Guided Monocular Omnidirectional Visual Odometry for Outdoor Ground Vehicles. IEEE Trans. Robot.
**2008**, 24, 1015–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Valiente, D.; Fernández, L.; Gil, A.; Payá, L.; Reinoso, Ó. Visual Odometry through Appearance- and Feature-Based Method with Omnidirectional Images. J. Robot.
**2012**, 2012, 797063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Se, S.; Lowe, D.; Little, J. Vision-based Mobile Robot Localization and Mapping using Scale-Invariant Features. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Seoul, Korea, 21–26 May 2001; Volume 2, pp. 2051–2058.
- Chli, M.; Davison, A.J. Active Matching for Visual Tracking. Robot. Auton. Syst.
**2009**, 57, 1173–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zhou, D.; Fremont, V.; Quost, B.; Wang, B. On Modeling Ego-Motion Uncertainty for Moving Object Detection from a Mobile Platform. In Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Dearborn, MI, USA, 8–11 June 2014; pp. 1332–1338.
- Lundquist, C.; Schön, T.B. Joint ego-motion and road geometry estimation. Inf. Fusion
**2011**, 12, 253–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Liu, Y.; Xiong, R.; Wang, Y.; Huang, H.; Xie, X.; Liu, X.; Zhang, G. Stereo Visual-Inertial Odometry With Multiple Kalman Filters Ensemble. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.
**2016**, 63, 6205–6216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Whelan, T.; Johannsson, H.; Kaess, M.; Leonard, J.J.; McDonald, J. Robust real-time visual odometry for dense RGB-D mapping. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Karlsruhe, Germany, 6–10 May 2013; pp. 5724–5731.
- Jiang, Y.; Xu, Y.; Liu, Y. Performance evaluation of feature detection and matching in stereo visual odometry. Neurocomputing
**2013**, 120, 380–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Suaib, N.M.; Marhaban, M.H.; Saripan, M.I.; Ahmad, S.A. Performance evaluation of feature detection and feature matching for stereo visual odometry using SIFT and SURF. In Proceedings of the IEEE Regin 10 Symposium, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 14–16 April 2014; pp. 200–203.
- Engel, J.; Schöps, T.; Cremers, D. LSD-SLAM: Large-Scale Direct Monocular SLAM. In European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV); Springer: Zurich, Switzerland, 2014; pp. 834–849. [Google Scholar]
- Engel, J.; Stuckler, J.; Cremers, D. Large-scale direct SLAM with stereo cameras. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Hamburg, Germany, 28 September–2 October 2015; pp. 1935–1942.
- Caruso, D.; Engel, J.; Cremers, D. Large-scale direct SLAM for omnidirectional cameras. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Hamburg, Germany, 28 September–2 October 2015; pp. 141–148.
- Goel, P.; Roumeliotis, S.I.; Sukhatme, G.S. Robust localization using relative and absolute position estimates. In Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human and Environment Friendly Robots with High Intelligence and Emotional Quotients (Cat. No.99CH36289), Kyongju, Korea, 17–21 October 1999; Volume 2, pp. 1134–1140.
- Wang, T.; Wu, Y.; Liang, J.; Han, C.; Chen, J.; Zhao, Q. Analysis and Experimental Kinematics of a Skid-Steering Wheeled Robot Based on a Laser Scanner Sensor. Sensors
**2015**, 15, 9681–9702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Scaramuzza, D.; Martinelli, A.; Siegwart, R. A Toolbox for Easily Calibrating Omnidirectional Cameras. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Beijing, China, 9–15 October 2006; pp. 5695–5701.
- Hartley, R.; Zisserman, A. Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Longuet-Higgins, H.C. A computer algorithm for reconstructing a scene from two projections. Nature
**1985**, 293, 133–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Servos, J.; Smart, M.; Waslander, S. Underwater stereo SLAM with refraction correction. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Tokyo, Japan, 3–7 November 2013; pp. 3350–3355.
- Bay, H.; Tuytelaars, T.; Van Gool, L. Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF). Comput. Vis. Image Underst.
**2008**, 110, 346–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gil, A.; Reinoso, O.; Ballesta, M.; Juliá, M.; Payá, L. Estimation of Visual Maps with a Robot Network Equipped with Vision Sensors. Sensors
**2010**, 10, 5209–5232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Davison, A.J. Real-Time Simultaneous Localisation and Mapping with a Single Camera. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision, Washington, DC, USA, 13–16 October 2003; Volume 2, pp. 1403–1410.
- Payá, L.; Amorós, F.; Fernández, L.; Reinoso, O. Performance of Global-Appearance Descriptors in Map Building and Localization Using Omnidirectional Vision. Sensors
**2014**, 14, 3033–3064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Neira, J.; Tardós, J.D. Data association in stochastic mapping using the joint compatibility test. IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom.
**2001**, 17, 890–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Li, Y.; Li, S.; Song, Q.; Liu, H.; Meng, M.H. Fast and Robust Data Association Using Posterior Based Approximate Joint Compatibility Test. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf.
**2014**, 10, 331–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Stachniss, C.; Grisetti, G.; Haehnel, D.; Burgard, W. Improved Rao-Blackwellized Mapping by Adaptive Sampling and Active Loop-Closure. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Self-Organization of Adaptive Behavior (SOAVE), Ilmenau, Germany, 28–30 September 2004; pp. 1–15.
- Grisetti, G.; Stachniss, C.; Burgard, W. Improved Techniques for Grid Mapping With Rao-Blackwellized Particle Filters. IEEE Trans. Robot.
**2007**, 23, 34–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

**Figure 1.**Real equipment used in this work: (

**a**) Pioneer P3-AT mounted with an omnidirectional camera, internal odometer and laser range finder; (

**b**) calibration procedure for the omnidirectional system.

**Figure 3.**Epipolar constraint adaption: (

**a**) planar reference system; (

**b**) adaption to our omnidirectional reference system.

**Figure 4.**Motion recovery between poses A and B: (

**a**) robot reference system; (

**b**) analogous relation in the camera reference system. A 3D point, $X(x,y,z)$ is indicated with its image projection (in pixels) on both camera frames, as ${p}_{A}(u,v)$ and ${p}_{B}(u,v)$, respectively.

**Figure 6.**Adaptive matching: a feature point ${p}_{1}$ on the first image generates a multi-scaled distribution, ${\lambda}_{i}{p}_{1}$, to account for the lack of scale. Then it is transformed into ${q}_{i}$ on the second image through a rotation R∼N($\widehat{\beta},{\sigma}_{\beta}$), a translation T∼N($\widehat{\varphi},{\sigma}_{\varphi}$) and a scale factor ρ. Finally, ${q}_{i}$ is projected onto the second image plane to define a reduced area where matches must be searched. The circled points represent the projection of ${\lambda}_{i}{p}_{1}$ (in the first image), as ${q}_{i}$ (in the second image). The epipolar curve transforms into a reshaped area due to the effect of the uncertainty propagation and the motion prediction, as per $\delta (\widehat{{z}_{t})}$ in Equation (14). Mahalanobis metric generates the final reshape on the feature descriptor space, denoted by the green area.

**Figure 7.**Graph-diagram of the view-based SLAM system. Colored items represent the estimation of the pose of the robot (${x}_{r,t}$), at each t. Blank items represent the internal odometer estimation, ${u}_{t}$. A set of observed views in the map, ${x}_{n}$, are also indicated. The prior for the next SLAM state is defined by our omnidirectional visual odometry, $v{o}_{t}$. The observation measurement to the views are expressed by ${z}_{t,n}$.

**Figure 8.**Dual 2D-3D map representation. Visual information is encoded on the 2D image plane by feature points in pixels $(u,v)$, which are compressed on each view, ${x}_{n}$. These views are representative for specific areas of the environment with different visual appearance. The re-estimation of views implies a simpler re-estimation of larger number of 3D landmarks at once. The position where views were initiated in the map is indicated by circles. An example of real images is also included.

**Figure 9.**Effects of γ on the map estimation (mean values): (

**a**) total number of views initiated in the map, N with γ; (

**b**) accuracy and time consumption with the number of views observed in the map.

**Figure 13.**Omnidirectional odometry in Dataset 1. The estimated odometry is drawn in continuous line and the ground truth in dash-dotted line. Circles represent the entire grid of omnidirectional images.

**Figure 14.**Omnidirectional odometry results in Dataset 1. (

**a**) error in X, Y and θ; (

**b**) RMSE (m) with 2σ versus the number of matched points.

**Figure 16.**Omnidirectional odometry accuracy as the error in (β, β, $\varphi $) versus the number of matched points. (

**a**) Solver 1; (

**b**) Solver 2; (

**c**) Solver 3. The bins represent subdivisions for the number of matched points detected. The frequency of repetition is presented as % out of the total.

**Figure 17.**Time consumption and error in (β,$\varphi $) versus the number of matched points: (

**a**) Solver 1; (

**b**) Solver 2; (

**c**) Solver 3.

**Figure 19.**SLAM results in Dataset 2: (

**a**) estimated omnidirectional visual odometry, drawn in dash-dotted line, ground truth in continuous line and internal odometry in dashed line; (

**b**) estimated SLAM solution, in dash-dotted line, when the prior input is the omnidirectional visual odometry shown in (

**a**). Again, the ground truth and internal odometry are also presented. The final map is constituted by N = 10 views, with their associated uncertainty ellipses.

**Figure 22.**SLAM results in Dataset 3. (

**a**) estimated omnidirectional visual odometry, drawn in dash-dotted line, ground truth in continuous line and internal odometry in dashed line; (

**b**) estimated SLAM solution, in dash-dotted line, when the prior input is the omnidirectional visual odometry shown in (

**a**). Again, the ground truth and internal odometry are also presented. The final map is constituted by N = 8 views, with their associated uncertainty ellipses.

**Figure 23.**Error results in Dataset 3: (

**a**) error in the omnidirectional visual odometry (Figure 22a) in X, Y and θ; (

**b**) error in the internal odometry for comparison purposes; (

**c**) error terms for the SLAM estimation presented in Figure 22b; (

**d**) RMSE (m) for the omnidirectional odometry with 2σ versus the number of matched points.

© 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Valiente, D.; Gil, A.; Reinoso, Ó.; Juliá, M.; Holloway, M. Improved Omnidirectional Odometry for a View-Based Mapping Approach. *Sensors* **2017**, *17*, 325.
https://doi.org/10.3390/s17020325

**AMA Style**

Valiente D, Gil A, Reinoso Ó, Juliá M, Holloway M. Improved Omnidirectional Odometry for a View-Based Mapping Approach. *Sensors*. 2017; 17(2):325.
https://doi.org/10.3390/s17020325

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Valiente, David, Arturo Gil, Óscar Reinoso, Miguel Juliá, and Mathew Holloway. 2017. "Improved Omnidirectional Odometry for a View-Based Mapping Approach" *Sensors* 17, no. 2: 325.
https://doi.org/10.3390/s17020325