Next Article in Journal
Responses of Soil Fauna Diversity to Management in the European Important Floodplain Habitats of the Danube
Previous Article in Journal
Characteristics of Zooplankton Distribution and Correlation with Stress Factors in Lake Dianchi Estuaries
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparative Evaluation of Destructive (EEI-c) and Non-Destructive (BEARI) Macroalgal Indices for Ecological Status Assessment of Aegean Coastal Waters
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Transcriptional Variability Among Posidonia oceanica Meadows Reveals Pronounced Spatial Heterogeneity Across Gökova Bay (Eastern Mediterranean)

Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Ege University, Izmir 35100, Türkiye
Diversity 2026, 18(8), 449; https://doi.org/10.3390/d18080449
Submission received: 15 June 2026 / Revised: 13 July 2026 / Accepted: 20 July 2026 / Published: 27 July 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Systematics, Ecology and Biodiversity of Marine Algae and Seagrasses)

Abstract

Posidonia oceanica is a key foundation species of Mediterranean coastal ecosystems and is increasingly exposed to environmental stressors and local anthropogenic pressures. Understanding its early physiological responses is therefore essential for effective ecosystem monitoring and conservation. In this study, we investigated spatial variability in gene expression in P. oceanica across contrasting habitats within the eastern Aegean Sea. Samples were collected from outer bay, transition, and inner/coastal stations, and the expression of genes related to photosynthesis, antioxidant defense, heat stress and metal detoxification was quantified using RT-qPCR. Gene expression patterns revealed pronounced spatial heterogeneity across the bay. Photosynthesis-related genes were generally downregulated at several transition and inner/coastal stations, suggesting reduced photosynthetic performance under environmental stress. In contrast, antioxidant defense- and heat stress-related genes showed localized upregulation, indicating activation of protective mechanisms. Principal component analysis explained 55.54% of the total variance within the first two components and clearly separated stations according to their transcriptional profiles. These findings demonstrate that environmental heterogeneity within Gökova Bay is reflected at the molecular level in P. oceanica, generating site-specific transcriptional responses. The study highlights the potential of multigene expression approaches as sensitive early warning indicators for detecting sublethal stress in seagrass ecosystems and supporting biodiversity conservation and coastal management.

1. Introduction

Mediterranean endemic seagrass Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile is one of the most important foundation species of coastal ecosystems in the Mediterranean Sea. Often referred to as the “lungs of the Mediterranean,” P. oceanica meadows provide a wide range of essential ecosystem services, including long-term carbon sequestration (blue carbon storage), sediment stabilization, coastal protection, nutrient cycling, and the creation of structurally complex habitats that support high levels of biodiversity [1,2,3]. Because of their ecological importance and sensitivity to environmental change, P. oceanica meadows are widely recognized as valuable bioindicators of the ecological status of Mediterranean coastal ecosystems [4].
Despite their ecological significance, seagrass ecosystems worldwide are experiencing rapid decline due to increasing anthropogenic pressures and climate-related stressors [5]. Coastal development, anchoring activities, intense marine tourism, and deterioration of water quality can directly damage seagrass meadows or alter the environmental conditions necessary for their survival. In addition, climate change-related factors such as rising sea temperatures, changes in hydrodynamics and increased frequency of extreme events may further threaten the persistence of these ecosystems [6]. Even in protected areas, these combined pressures may influence the structure and functioning of seagrass habitats.
Gökova Bay, located in the southeastern Aegean Sea, hosts extensive P. oceanica meadows and has been designated as a Special Environmental Protection Area (SEPA) due to its ecological importance. Although this region supports some of the most valuable seagrass habitats along the Turkish coastline, environmental conditions within the bay are not homogeneous. Hydrodynamic circulation patterns, freshwater inputs, and varying levels of coastal use create spatial heterogeneity in environmental conditions across the bay. Recent ecological monitoring studies conducted within the Gökova SEPA have revealed differences in benthic community structure, sediment composition and anthropogenic pressures among stations, indicating that P. oceanica meadows within the bay may experience different levels of environmental stress [7].
Traditional monitoring approaches for seagrass ecosystems often rely on morphological indicators such as shoot density, leaf length, or meadow coverage. However, these structural changes typically become visible only after substantial physiological damage has already occurred. Molecular approaches can advance understanding of plant responses to environmental stress by detecting changes in gene expression before visible symptoms appear. For this reason, the analysis of stress-related gene expression has emerged as a powerful tool for assessing the physiological condition of marine macrophytes and for identifying early-warning indicators of ecosystem degradation [8,9,10]. Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) is particularly suitable for such studies because it enables the sensitive detection of transcriptional changes in key metabolic and stress-response pathways.
Environmental stress in plants frequently leads to the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which can cause oxidative damage to cellular components, including proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids. To mitigate this damage, plants activate antioxidant defense mechanisms involving enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), glutathione reductase (GR), and glutathione S-transferase (GST), which collectively maintain cellular redox homeostasis [11]. In addition to oxidative stress responses, increased sea temperatures can disrupt protein stability and cellular homeostasis. Heat shock proteins (HSPs) and heat shock transcription factors (HSFs) therefore play a crucial role in protecting cellular proteins under stress conditions by acting as molecular chaperones that stabilize or refold damaged proteins [12,13,14].
Photosynthesis represents another key physiological process that is highly sensitive to environmental variability. Genes encoding components of the photosystem II reaction center, such as psbA and psbD, together with genes involved in carbon fixation, including the large and small subunits of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (rbcL and rbcS), are commonly used as molecular indicators of photosynthetic performance and energy metabolism in marine plants [9]. Furthermore, metallothioneins (MT) and metal transport proteins (MTP) play an important role in metal homeostasis and detoxification processes, and their expression may reflect environmental stress related to exposure to metal [15].
Although previous studies have examined molecular responses of P. oceanica to specific environmental stressors such as temperature increase, light variability, or ocean acidification, most of these investigations have been conducted under controlled laboratory conditions or in limited geographic regions of the Mediterranean Sea [9,14]. Consequently, relatively little is known about how natural populations of P. oceanica respond at the transcriptional level to spatial environmental variability within protected coastal ecosystems. In particular, molecular data describing stress-related gene expression patterns of P. oceanica populations from the eastern Mediterranean and the Aegean Sea remain scarce. Moreover, integrated studies examining multiple physiological pathways across natural environmental gradients in seagrass habitats are still limited.
Therefore, the present study provides the first bay-scale molecular assessment of P. oceanica across 17 sampling stations within the Gökova SEPA, one of the most environmentally heterogeneous coastal ecosystems in the eastern Aegean Sea. Unlike previous studies that primarily examined individual stressors, this work simultaneously evaluates four major stress response pathways, including photosynthesis, antioxidant defense, heat-shock response, and metal homeostasis, thereby providing an integrated assessment of physiological acclimation under natural environmental conditions.
Recent large-scale ecological assessments conducted in Gökova SEPA have documented pronounced spatial variability in hydrodynamic conditions, temperature regimes, water quality, habitat characteristics, and anthropogenic pressures, highlighting the complex environmental mosaic experienced by seagrass meadows [16,17].
We therefore hypothesized that meadows exposed to contrasting local environmental conditions would exhibit distinct transcriptional profiles. Specifically, genes associated with photosynthesis (psbA, psbD, rbcL, and rbcS), oxidative stress defense (SOD, APX3, GR, and GST), cellular stress protection (SHSP, HSP90, DehSP, DSP5, LBP, CYP, and HSFA5), and metal homeostasis (MT and MTP) were expected to show differential expression among stations, reflecting physiological acclimation to spatial environmental heterogeneity across Gökova Bay.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection

P. oceanica samples were collected from multiple stations within the Gökova SEPA, located in the southeastern Aegean Sea along the southwestern coast of Türkiye (Figure 1). Sampling was conducted by diving at a depth of approximately 10 m, where well-developed P. oceanica meadows were present [18]. The geographic coordinates, station abbreviations, water temperature, pH, and salinity measurements are provided in Table 1. As spatial proxies for potential anthropogenic influence, the distance of each sampling station to the nearest coastline and harbor was calculated using OpenStreetMap spatial data accessed through the OSMnx package (version 2.0.6) in Python (version 3.12; Python Software Foundation, Wilmington, DE, USA). These variables were used to characterize spatial gradients associated with coastal proximity and harbor accessibility among sampling sites. Because these metrics represent indirect spatial proxies rather than direct measurements of human pressure, they were interpreted cautiously and were not considered comprehensive indicators of anthropogenic impact (Table S1).
Healthy leaf tissues were collected from randomly selected shoots to minimize sampling bias. For each station, three independent biological replicates were collected. After collection, samples were immediately placed in sterile tubes and RNALater (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) buffer and transported to the laboratory in cooled containers. The samples were subsequently stored at −20 °C until RNA extraction.

2.2. RNA Isolation and cDNA Synthesis

Total RNA was isolated from P. oceanica leaf tissues using TRIzol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Approximately 100 mg of leaf tissue was homogenized prior to RNA extraction.
RNA concentration and purity were determined using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). RNA quality was assessed based on absorbance ratios A260/A280 and A260/A230, and only samples with ratios between 1.8 and 2.1 were used for further analysis.
For cDNA synthesis, equal amounts of RNA (250 ng) were used for each reaction to ensure comparability among samples. Complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized using the EvoScript Universal Reverse Transcriptase kit (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) following the manufacturer’s protocol. The resulting cDNA samples were stored at −20 °C until quantitative PCR analysis.

2.3. Gene Expression Analysis

Primer specificity and amplification efficiency were first verified by conventional PCR using pooled cDNA samples. The PCR reaction mixture contained 2.5 µL of 10× Thermo DreamTaq buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) (containing KCl and 20 mM MgCl2), 1 µL of 10 mM dNTP mix, 1 µL each of forward and reverse primers (10 µM), 0.5 µL of DreamTaq DNA polymerase, 2 µL of cDNA template, and 17 µL of ultrapure water, resulting in a final reaction volume of 25 µL.
PCR amplification was carried out under the following thermal conditions: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 2 min, followed by 35 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at the gene-specific temperature for 50 s, and extension at 72 °C for 1 min, with a final extension step at 72 °C for 10 min. PCR products were visualized on a 1.5% agarose gel stained with RedSafe Nucleic Acid Staining Solution (iNtRON Biotechnology, Seongnam, Gyeonggi, Republic of Korea) and electrophoresed at 100 V.
Quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) was performed using the LightCycler 480 system (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). Target genes were selected to represent key physiological pathways, including photosynthesis (psbA, psbD, rbcL, rbcS, FD, and ATPA), oxidative stress response (SOD, APX3, GR, GST, GPX, GSH-S, LPX, and AOX), cellular stress protection (SHSP, HSP90, HSFA5, DehSP, DSP5, LBP, and CYP), and metal detoxification (MT and MTP). Primer sequences used in the study are provided in Table S1.
Each qPCR reaction consisted of 4 µL of LightCycler 480 SYBR Green I Master mix (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany), 1 µL each of forward and reverse primers (10 µM), 2 µL of cDNA template, and 12 µL of nuclease free water, resulting in a final reaction volume of 20 µL. The thermal cycling program included an initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s, annealing at the primer-specific temperature for 10 s and extension at 72 °C for 20 s [19].
The stability of candidate reference genes (18S, eIF4A, and NTUB) was evaluated using the RefFinder platform, which integrates four commonly used algorithms (geNorm, NormFinder, BestKeeper, and the comparative ΔCt method) to generate a comprehensive stability ranking. Detailed rankings obtained from each algorithm, together with BestKeeper descriptive statistics, are provided in Supplementary Tables S2–S5 and Supplementary Figures S1 and S2. Based on the comprehensive RefFinder ranking, 18S was identified as the most stable reference gene and was therefore selected as the internal reference gene for normalization.
PCR amplification efficiency for each primer pair was determined using standard curves generated from serial dilutions of pooled cDNA. Amplification efficiency (E) was calculated from the slope of the standard curve according to the equation E (%) = (10 − 1/slope − 1) × 100, and only primer pairs showing acceptable efficiencies and linearity (R2) were used for quantitative analyses. Relative gene expression was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method. Primer characteristics, including annealing temperature, amplicon length, amplification efficiency, and regression coefficient (R2), are presented in Supplementary Table S1.

Relative Gene Expression Analysis

Candidate reference genes (18S, eIF4A, and NTUB) were evaluated for expression stability across all samples. Reference gene stability was assessed using the RefFinder platform, which integrates the algorithms geNorm, NormFinder, BestKeeper and the comparative ΔCt method. Based on the integrated stability ranking, 18S was identified as the most stable transcript across all stations and experimental conditions and was subsequently used as the normalization control (Table S2).
Relative gene expression levels were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method [20].
ΔCt = Ct(target) − Ct(reference)
ΔΔCt = (ΔCt target − ΔCt reference) sample − (ΔCt target − ΔCt reference) control
All qPCR reactions were performed with three biological replicates, and each reaction was conducted in technical duplicates.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 10 (GraphPad Software, USA) and PAST version 5.0 [21]. Relative gene expression values were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method and expressed as mean ± standard error (SE) based on three biological replicates.
To evaluate spatial variability in transcriptional responses, genes were grouped into functional categories including photosynthesis, antioxidant defense, and chaperone/metal tolerance pathways. Differences among stations and gene categories were assessed using two-way analysis of variance (two-way ANOVA), with sampling station and gene identity treated as fixed factors. The proportion of explained variance attributable to each factor was calculated from the ANOVA sums of squares.
Multivariate patterns in gene expression were explored using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) based on station-averaged expression values. PCA was performed separately for photosynthetic, antioxidant defense, stress-related and integrated gene datasets. As an exploratory multivariate ordination method, PCA was used to visualize the major patterns of transcriptional variation among sampling stations and was interpreted based on the proportion of variance explained by the principal components.
Hierarchical clustering analysis was conducted using Euclidean distance and Ward’s linkage method. Cluster results were visualized as heatmaps of log2 transformed relative expression values.
To investigate potential relationships between transcriptional patterns and environmental variables, Pearson correlation analyses were performed between the first principal component (PC1) scores obtained from the integrated PCA and measured physicochemical parameters (temperature, pH and salinity).
The combined influence of environmental variables on gene expression patterns was further evaluated using redundancy analysis (RDA). Gene expression data were used as response variables, whereas temperature, pH and salinity were included as explanatory variables. Statistical significance of the constrained ordination model was assessed using a Monte Carlo permutation test with 999 permutations. Statistical significance was accepted at p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Spatial Variability in Gene Expression

Gene expression analyses revealed pronounced spatial heterogeneity among P. oceanica meadows across Gökova Bay. Most photosynthesis-related genes were downregulated relative to the reference station (Karada), whereas antioxidant defense, chaperone, and metal tolerance genes exhibited highly variable station-specific expression patterns. The magnitude and direction of transcriptional responses differed markedly among stations, indicating pronounced spatial heterogeneity in transcriptional responses throughout the study area.
To facilitate interpretation, stations were grouped according to their geographic position and transcriptional characteristics into (i) outer bay and northern coastal stations (TavşanBükü, Orak Island, Orak Island (Shelter), Kıssebükü, Şeytan Deresi, Yukarı Mazı, Aşağı Mazı and Çökertme); (ii) inner bay stations (Bördübet, Bördübet BK, Ada, 7 Ada, Kargılıbük, Löngöz and Okluk); and (iii) Akyaka, which was evaluated separately because of its distinct urban influence. Karada was used as the reference station for all relative expression analyses (Figure 2, Table S6). This station was designated as the baseline site during the study design to provide a common reference for comparing spatial transcriptional variation among the remaining sampling stations across Gökova Bay. Relative gene expression at all other stations was calculated with respect to this reference.

3.2. Photosynthetic Responses

Photosynthetic genes displayed widespread suppression across most stations. Particularly strong reductions were observed for psbD, rbcS, FD, and ATPA, indicating impairment of photosystem stability, carbon fixation, and electron transport processes. Despite this general trend, several stations retained partial photosynthetic functionality. Kıssebükü, Bördübet, and Okluk maintained positive or near-reference expression of psbA, suggesting active PSII repair mechanisms. In contrast, Şeytan Deresi, 7 Ada, Kargılıbük and Löngöz exhibited severe suppression across nearly all photosynthetic markers, reflecting extensive physiological impairment. Relative expression profiles of photosynthesis-related genes are shown in Figure 3A.
Two-way ANOVA revealed significant station-dependent variation in photosynthesis-related gene expression (p < 0.0001). Significant gene × station interactions further indicated that photosynthetic genes responded differently among sampling locations. The interaction term accounted for 40.75% of the total variance, highlighting pronounced gene-specific transcriptional responses across stations (Table S7).
PCA explained 69.88% of the total variance within the first two axes (PC1 = 48.47%, PC2 = 21.41%). PC1 was positively associated with all photosynthetic genes, with ATPA, PsbA, FD, and PsbD showing the strongest contributions, indicating a gradient of photosynthesis-related transcriptional activity. 7 Ada, Kıssebükü, Okluk, Çökertme, and Bördübet were positioned on the positive side of PC1, whereas Kargılıbük, Şeytan Deresi, Löngöz and Yukarı Mazı occupied the negative side, demonstrating pronounced spatial variation in photosynthetic performance among P. oceanica meadows. The spatial separation of stations based on photosynthetic gene expression is illustrated in Figure 4B.

3.3. Antioxidant and Chaperone Responses

Antioxidant defense genes exhibited strong station-specific responses. Several stations, including Tavşanbükü, Orak Island Shelter, Aşağı Mazı, and Bördübet, showed induction of GPX, GSH-S, and related antioxidant pathways, whereas severe suppression of antioxidant defense genes characterized Şeytan Deresi, 7 Ada, Kargılıbük and Löngöz. Expression profiles of antioxidant genes are presented in Figure 3B.
Two-way ANOVA confirmed significant spatial variation in antioxidant defense gene expression among stations (p < 0.0001). Significant gene × station interactions indicated that antioxidant pathways responded differently among locations, reflecting substantial heterogeneity in oxidative stress responses throughout Gökova Bay (Table S7).
Chaperone-related genes exhibited significant spatial variation among stations (p < 0.0001), with strong gene × station interactions indicating highly gene-specific transcriptional responses across the study area (Table S7). Expression patterns were particularly variable among HSP90, SHSP, DehSP, and DSP5, indicating strong gene-specific stress responses. HSP90 and DSP5 were strongly induced at Akyaka, Orak Island Shelter and Okluk, whereas profound suppression characterized 7 Ada, Kargılıbük and Löngöz. Chaperone-related gene expression patterns are shown in Figure 3C.
PCA of antioxidant defense genes revealed that PC1 and PC2 explained 55.9% and 17.2% of the total variance, respectively, accounting for 73.2% of the overall variability. PC1 was primarily associated with the glutathione-dependent antioxidant pathway, showing strong positive contributions from GR, GPX, and GSH-S, whereas PC2 reflected variation related to GST and AOX mediated oxidative stress responses. Stations such as Tavşanbükü, Çökertme, and 7 Adalar displayed elevated antioxidant activity, while Kargalı, Şeytan Deresi, and Löngöz were characterized by reduced expression across the glutathione-associated defense axis. The distribution of stations based on antioxidant defense gene expression is presented in Figure 4C.

3.4. Metal Tolerance Pathways

Metal tolerance-related genes exhibited distinct spatial patterns. MT and MTP were strongly induced at several stations, including Orak Island Shelter, Kıssebükü, Çökertme, Bördübet, Okluk, and Akyaka, whereas expression remained low or suppressed at 7 Adalar and Löngöz. In several severely impaired stations, MT remained among the few genes retaining positive expression, indicating persistent activation of metal detoxification mechanisms despite broader physiological collapse. Relative expression levels of metal tolerance genes are shown in Figure 3C.
PCA of stress- and detoxification-related genes explained 55.5% of the total variance within the first two components (PC1 = 35.2%, PC2 = 20.3%). PC1 was primarily associated with SHSP, DehSP, HsfA5, and LBP, representing a general cellular stress response axis. Stations such as Tavşanbükü, 7 Adalar, Çökertme, Orak Island Shelter and Orak Island were positioned on the positive side of PC1, indicating elevated expression of molecular chaperones and protective stress response genes. In contrast, Kargılıbük, Şeytan Deresi, Yukarı Mazı and Ada were located on the negative side of the ordination space. PC2 was mainly influenced by HSP90 and DSP5, reflecting variation in protein repair and cellular protection mechanisms among stations. The ordination of stations based on stress and detoxification pathways is presented in Figure 4D.

3.5. Integrated Transcriptional Patterns

Integrated PCA based on all measured genes explained 55.54% of the total variance within the first two principal components (PC1 = 43.43%, PC2 = 12.12%) (Figure 4A). PC1 represented a coordinated physiological activity gradient and was primarily associated with ATPA, GR, GPX, SHSP, GSH-S, PsbA, and DehSP. Tavşan Burnu, 7 Adalar, Çökertme, Okluk, and Kıssebükü were positioned on the positive side of PC1, whereas Kargılıbük, Şeytan Deresi, Löngöz and Yukarı Mazı occupied the negative side of the ordination space, indicating substantial spatial variation in the transcriptional activity of P. oceanica meadows across Gökova Bay.
Hierarchical clustering and heatmap analyses further resolved two major transcriptional groups (Figure 2). The first cluster included 7 Adalar, TavşanBükü, KısseBükü Bay, Çökertme, Okluk, Orak Island, Orak Island Shelter, and Akbük, which were characterized by elevated expression of photosynthetic-, antioxidant-, and stress-related genes. The second cluster comprised Şeytan Deresi, Yukarı Mazı, Bördübet, Büyüyen Kayalar, Löngöz, Ada, Aşağı Mazı and Kargılıbük, exhibiting generally lower expression levels across multiple functional pathways. Overall, both PCA and hierarchical clustering revealed pronounced spatial heterogeneity in gene expression patterns among P. oceanica meadows throughout Gökova Bay.

3.6. Relationship Between Gene Expression and Environmental Variables

Pearson correlation analyses revealed no significant relationships between PC1 scores and temperature (r = −0.006, p = 0.983), pH (r = −0.044, p = 0.871) or salinity (r = −0.024, p = 0.929). Similarly, redundancy analysis (RDA) indicated that temperature, pH and salinity explained only 17.9% of the total transcriptional variance (R2 = 0.1787), and the overall model was not significant (F = 0.943, permutation test, p = 0.536) (Table S8). These results suggest that the observed spatial variability in gene expression cannot be explained solely by the measured physicochemical parameters.

4. Discussion

The present study demonstrates that the pronounced spatial heterogeneity of Gökova Bay is reflected at the molecular level in P. oceanica populations. RT-qPCR analyses, two-way ANOVA, PCA, hierarchical clustering, and heatmap visualization consistently revealed strong station-specific differences in photosynthetic, antioxidant, chaperone, and metal tolerance pathways. Significant effects of gene identity, station, and gene × station interactions across all functional gene groups indicate that P. oceanica does not respond through a uniform transcriptional program but rather through highly gene-specific acclimation strategies reflecting pronounced spatial heterogeneity across the bay. These findings support growing evidence that seagrasses respond to multiple interacting environmental drivers operating simultaneously within coastal ecosystems [22,23,24,25].
The physical oceanography of Gökova Bay provides an important framework for interpreting these patterns. Previous hydrographic studies identified a basin-scale cyclonic circulation generating a dominant westward flow along the northern coastline [26]. This circulation creates spatial differences in water renewal, residence times, and thermal retention while potentially influencing the transport of thermal and chemical inputs originating from the thermal power complex [27]. Consequently, hydrodynamic connectivity likely contributes to the spatial transcriptional patterns observed across Gökova Bay.
Photosynthesis-related genes showed marked spatial variation among stations, indicating substantial differences in photosynthetic performance and energy metabolism across Gökova Bay. Because these genes are directly involved in PSII function, electron transport, and carbon fixation, their coordinated suppression is consistent with chronic environmental stress, as previously reported for P. oceanica under thermal stress, altered irradiance, and ocean acidification [9,14]. The PCA results further supported this interpretation, with ATPA, PsbA, FD, and PsbD contributing most strongly to the primary axis of variation. This pattern indicates that differences in photosynthetic energy production, PSII maintenance and electron transport represent major drivers of physiological variability among P. oceanica meadows in Gökova Bay.
The expression patterns of psbA and psbD were particularly informative in distinguishing active acclimation from physiological deterioration. Because psbA encodes the rapidly turning over D1 protein of PSII, increased psbA expression is generally interpreted as evidence of active repair and photoprotection. In contrast, coordinated suppression of both psbA and psbD is typically associated with severe or prolonged stress and impaired photosynthetic stability [14,28]. Despite the overall trend of photosynthetic suppression, several stations located within the northern circulation corridor exhibited molecular signatures consistent with active physiological acclimation.
Such transcriptional profiles suggest maintenance of photoprotective repair mechanisms and coordinated activation of cellular defense pathways, indicating active acclimation rather than generalized metabolic decline [14,28].
Hydrodynamic connectivity may contribute to this enhanced resilience. Stations such as Kıssebükü and Çökertme are influenced by the active northern branch of the cyclonic circulation system [26], where continuous water exchange likely reduces the persistence of localized thermal anomalies, nutrient accumulation, and hypoxic conditions. The close clustering of Kıssebükü and Çökertme in the photosynthetic PCA further supports the existence of shared local conditions and similar physiological responses along the northern circulation corridor. Although elevated expression of MT and MTP was detected at several stations, multivariate analyses indicated that photosynthetic performance and cellular stress responses contributed more strongly to station differentiation than metal tolerance pathways alone. MTs and MTPs play central roles in intracellular metal homeostasis and detoxification but may also be induced by oxidative stress and other environmental stressors. Previous studies conducted in Gökova Bay have reported spatial variation in trace metal concentrations in sediments and the water column, identifying terrestrial runoff, agricultural and domestic inputs, tourism-related activities, and maritime traffic as important regional sources of metal contamination [29,30]. Sediment assessments from different locations within the bay have also identified spatial variation in trace metal distribution, indicating that metal availability may differ considerably among coastal habitats [7]. However, because trace metal concentrations were not measured in the present study, the observed MT and MTP expression patterns should be interpreted as components of general stress-responsive pathways rather than direct evidence of metal exposure.
In contrast, Şeytan Deresi, Kargılıbük, and Löngöz displayed broad suppression of photosynthetic, antioxidant, and heat-shock pathways, indicating advanced physiological stress. Hydrodynamic isolation, elevated residence times, and enhanced thermal retention have previously been described for sheltered inner-bay environments [26,31], potentially increasing vulnerability to nutrient accumulation and oxygen depletion. This interpretation is supported by the inverse relationship between temperature and dissolved oxygen reported for the northern coastline of Gökova Bay [32]. Field observations of mucilage accumulation further suggest that shading and diffusion limitations may have contributed to the severe transcriptional suppression observed. Together, these findings indicate that P. oceanica populations across Gökova Bay occupy different positions along a continuum ranging from active acclimation to advanced physiological deterioration.
Glutathione-dependent antioxidant metabolism appears to represent one of the principal mechanisms underlying spatial physiological differentiation among P. oceanica meadows. These genes showed the strongest contributions to the primary axis of variation and highlight the central role of glutathione metabolism in maintaining redox homeostasis under heterogeneous environmental conditions.
Glutathione-dependent antioxidant metabolism appears to represent one of the principal mechanisms underlying spatial physiological differentiation among P. oceanica meadows. This finding highlights the importance of glutathione mediated redox regulation as a key component of the antioxidant defense system, enabling seagrasses to maintain cellular homeostasis under heterogeneous environmental conditions. Elevated temperature, nutrient enrichment, reduced circulation, and hypoxia are all known to increase ROS production and disrupt cellular homeostasis [11,33,34,35], making antioxidant activation a critical adaptive response. The observed spatial variability in antioxidant gene expression further suggests that individual meadows experience distinct local stress regimes, resulting in different physiological acclimation strategies across Gökova Bay.
Heat-shock proteins and stress-related transcription factors constituted a second major physiological response associated with environmental heterogeneity. The predominance of molecular chaperones within the stress response network suggests that maintaining protein stability is a central component of acclimation in P. oceanica. Heat-shock proteins and stress-related transcription factors are well recognized for their roles in protein stabilization, osmotic adjustment and cellular stress tolerance [12,13]. Their differential expression among sampling stations indicates substantial variation in the capacity of local populations to maintain protein homeostasis and activate protective cellular mechanisms under contrasting environmental conditions. Overall, these findings suggest that protein quality control and molecular chaperone activity represent key adaptive mechanisms enabling P. oceanica to cope with heterogeneous environmental stress across Gökova Bay.
The relatively limited contribution of MT and MTP to the major PCA axes suggests that metal detoxification pathways played a secondary role in explaining the observed spatial variability. Although metal-related stress cannot be excluded, the overall transcriptional patterns indicate that protein maintenance, antioxidant defense and photosynthetic regulation were the dominant physiological processes shaping the responses of P. oceanica across Gökova Bay. This observation does not diminish the potential ecological importance of metal exposure but rather suggests that multiple environmental drivers act simultaneously and that cellular stress-management mechanisms represent the primary acclimation strategy under current environmental conditions [15].
Multivariate analyses further demonstrated that molecular responses were organized primarily according to physiological condition rather than geographic proximity. Stations that were geographically distant frequently clustered together when they exhibited similar transcriptional profiles, whereas neighboring stations sometimes displayed markedly different molecular responses. Similar discrepancies between ecological condition and nominal protection status have also been reported for Aegean phytobenthic habitats [18]. These findings emphasize the importance of cumulative environmental pressures in shaping seagrass responses and suggest that local environmental heterogeneity may override simple geographic patterns.
To assess whether the major transcriptional gradient identified by the integrated PCA was associated with measured environmental conditions, Pearson correlation and redundancy analyses were performed using temperature, pH and salinity. Neither Pearson correlation nor redundancy analysis identified significant relationships between transcriptional variation and the measured physicochemical variables, indicating that additional environmental drivers are likely responsible for the observed molecular heterogeneity. Instead, hydrodynamic processes, local environmental heterogeneity and unmeasured stressors are likely to play a more important role in shaping transcriptional responses of P. oceanica across Gökova Bay.
A particularly informative example was Ada station, where severe downregulation of psbD, GR and LPX coincided with extensive dead leaf accumulation. This pattern may be consistent with advanced physiological deterioration and accelerated senescence. Similar transcriptomic shifts have previously been proposed as early indicators of meadow decline in P. oceanica [22] and may represent an early molecular stage preceding broader habitat regression.
Akyaka exhibited a distinct transcriptional profile characterized by elevated expression of several antioxidant defense and stress response genes. Its position within the multivariate analyses suggests the influence of localized environmental conditions associated with urban activities, freshwater inputs, and increased coastal use. The combination of these factors may contribute to the unique physiological signature observed at this station relative to the other meadows examined in the study.
The distinctive transcriptional profile observed at Akyaka may be associated with site-specific environmental conditions and its proximity to coastal and harbour-related activities. However, because direct quantitative measurements of anthropogenic pressure, such as boating intensity, nutrient loading, or coastal-use intensity, were not available for all stations, this interpretation should be considered cautiously.
Collectively, these findings demonstrate that transcriptional biomarkers provide a highly sensitive framework for detecting environmental stress before visible degradation becomes apparent at the meadow scale. The combined evidence from ANOVA, PCA, hierarchical clustering, and RDA suggests that hydrodynamic connectivity, spatial environmental heterogeneity, and unmeasured stressors play important roles in shaping the physiological condition of P. oceanica populations across Gökova Bay. These results complement recent ecological studies conducted in Gökova Bay, which have highlighted the importance of habitat heterogeneity, ecological restoration, and adaptive management for maintaining the resilience of Mediterranean coastal ecosystems [16,17]. Together, these findings demonstrate that molecular biomarkers can reveal fine-scale physiological variation that may not be detected using conventional ecological assessments alone. Integrating transcriptomic biomarkers with long-term environmental monitoring and ecological surveys will improve our understanding of seagrass resilience and provide valuable support for the conservation and management of P. oceanica meadows in the eastern Mediterranean. Future studies integrating transcriptomic biomarkers with continuous environmental monitoring, quantitative anthropogenic-pressure indices, nutrient concentrations, dissolved oxygen, sediment characteristics and contaminant loads will provide a more comprehensive understanding of the environmental drivers shaping transcriptional variation in P. oceanica across Gökova Bay.
Only a small proportion of the observed transcriptional variation was explained by the measured physicochemical variables, indicating that temperature, pH and salinity alone are insufficient to account for the complex molecular responses observed across Gökova Bay. This finding suggests that additional environmental drivers, including hydrodynamic processes, nutrient availability, dissolved oxygen, sediment characteristics, contaminant exposure, trace metal availability and other site-specific factors, are likely to contribute to the observed spatial transcriptional heterogeneity. Because these environmental stressors were not directly quantified, the observed transcriptional patterns should be interpreted as indicators of physiological stress responses rather than definitive signatures of specific stressors. Future studies integrating transcriptomic biomarkers with direct measurements of these environmental variables will provide a more comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms underlying spatial transcriptional variability in P. oceanica.

5. Conclusions

This study provides the first bay-scale assessment of transcriptional responses in P. oceanica across Gökova Bay using an integrated set of photosynthetic, antioxidant defense, stress-related and metal tolerance biomarkers. Significant spatial differences in gene expression were identified among meadows, revealing pronounced transcriptional heterogeneity throughout the study area. Multivariate analyses consistently demonstrated that stations differed primarily according to their physiological condition rather than their geographic proximity, highlighting the importance of local-scale environmental influences.
Although temperature, pH and salinity varied among stations, neither correlation analyses nor redundancy analyses identified significant relationships between these variables and the observed transcriptional patterns. These findings indicate that the measured physicochemical parameters alone cannot explain the molecular variability detected across Gökova Bay and suggest that hydrodynamic connectivity, local environmental heterogeneity, and other unmeasured stressors may play more important roles in shaping seagrass responses.
The strong agreement among ANOVA, PCA, hierarchical clustering, and heatmap analyses demonstrates the robustness of the identified expression patterns and highlights the value of molecular biomarkers for detecting physiological stress before visible deterioration becomes evident at the meadow scale. By integrating gene expression profiling with ecological and oceanographic perspectives, this study contributes to a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying the resilience and vulnerability of P. oceanica populations and supports the incorporation of molecular tools into future seagrass monitoring and conservation programs in the Mediterranean Sea.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/d18080449/s1. Table S1. Gene symbols, protein names, Gene Ontology annotations, primer sequences, annealing temperatures, amplicon lengths, PCR amplification efficiencies, correlation coefficients (R2), and references used for RT-qPCR analyses. Table S2. Stability ranking of candidate reference genes obtained using BestKeeper, NormFinder, geNorm, the comparative ΔCt method, and the comprehensive RefFinder analysis. Figure S1. Stability ranking of candidate reference genes based on the integrated RefFinder analysis and the comparative ΔCt method. Figure S2. Stability ranking of candidate reference genes obtained using the BestKeeper, NormFinder, and geNorm algorithms. Table S3. Descriptive statistics of candidate reference genes calculated using the BestKeeper algorithm. Table S4. Pearson correlation coefficients among candidate reference genes calculated using BestKeeper. Table S5. Correlation coefficients between each candidate reference gene and the BestKeeper Index. Table S6. GIS-derived spatial characteristics of the 17 sampling stations in Gökova Bay, including the distance to the nearest coastline, harbour, and settlement. Table S7. Results of two-way ANOVA evaluating the effects of gene identity, sampling station, and gene × station interaction on photosynthetic, antioxidant defense, chaperone, and metal homeostasis gene expression in Posidonia oceanica, including degrees of freedom (df), F-values, p-values, and explained variation (%). Table S8. Redundancy analysis (RDA) showing the relationships between gene expression profiles and the environmental variables included in the final constrained ordination model.

Funding

This study received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Materials. Additional data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank İnci Tuney Kızılkaya and Büşra Kuruoğlu for their valuable assistance during field sampling activities in Gökova Bay. During the preparation of this manuscript, the author used ChatGPT (OpenAI, GPT-5.5) for language editing. The author reviewed and edited all generated content and takes full responsibility for the content of this publication. The author would like to thank the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TÜBİTAK; Grant No. 124Y341) for supporting the RNA analyses performed in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Duarte, C.M. The Future of Seagrass Meadows. Environ. Conserv. 2002, 29, 192–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Orth, R.J.; Carruthers, T.J.B.; Dennison, W.C.; Duarte, C.M.; Fourqurean, J.W.; Heck, K.L.; Hughes, A.R.; Kendrick, G.A.; Kenworthy, W.J.; Olyarnik, S.; et al. A Global Crisis for Seagrass Ecosystems. BioScience 2006, 56, 987–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Boudouresque, C.F.; Pergent, G.; Pergent-Martini, C.; Ruitton, S.; Thibaut, T.; Verlaque, M. The Necromass of the Posidonia oceanica Seagrass Meadow: Fate, Role, Ecosystem Services and Vulnerability. Hydrobiologia 2016, 781, 25–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pergent-Martini, C.; Leoni, V.; Pasqualini, V.; Ardizzone, G.D.; Balestri, E.; Bedini, R.; Belluscio, A.; Belsher, T.; Borg, J.; Boudouresque, C.F.; et al. Descriptors of Posidonia oceanica Meadows: Use and Application. Ecol. Indic. 2005, 5, 213–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Waycott, M.; Duarte, C.M.; Carruthers, T.J.B.; Orth, R.J.; Dennison, W.C.; Olyarnik, S.; Calladine, A.; Fourqurean, J.W.; Heck, K.L.; Hughes, A.R.; et al. Accelerating Loss of Seagrasses Across the Globe Threatens Coastal Ecosystems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 12377–12381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Marbà, N.; Díaz-Almela, E.; Duarte, C.M. Mediterranean Seagrass (Posidonia oceanica) Loss Between 1842 and 2009. Biol. Conserv. 2014, 176, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Duman, M.; Eronat, A.H. Metal Contamination in the Coastal Zone of Gökova Gulf Including Special Environmental Protection Area (Western Türkiye): Sediment Quality Indices and Environmental Implications. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2026, 222, 118858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Procaccini, G.; Beer, S.; Björk, M.; Olsen, J.; Mazzuca, S.; Santos, R. Seagrass Ecophysiology Meets Ecological Genomics: Are We Ready? Mar. Ecol. 2012, 33, 522–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dattolo, E.; Ruocco, M.; Brunet, C.; Lorenti, M.; Lauritano, C.; D’Esposito, D.; De Luca, P.; Sanges, R.; Mazzuca, S.; Procaccini, G. Response of the Seagrass Posidonia oceanica to Different Light Environments: Insights from a Combined Molecular and Photo-Physiological Study. Mar. Environ. Res. 2014, 101, 225–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Nguyen, H.M.; Kim, M.; Ralph, P.J.; Marín-Guirao, L.; Pernice, M.; Procaccini, G. Stress Memory in Seagrasses: First Insight into the Effects of Thermal Priming and the Role of Epigenetic Modifications. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Gill, S.S.; Tuteja, N. Reactive Oxygen Species and Antioxidant Machinery in Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Crop Plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2010, 48, 909–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Vierling, E. The Roles of Heat Shock Proteins in Plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1991, 42, 579–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Franssen, S.U.; Gu, J.; Bergmann, N.; Winters, G.; Klostermeier, U.C.; Rosenstiel, P.; Bornberg-Bauer, E.; Reusch, T.B.H. Transcriptomic Resilience to Global Warming in the Seagrass Zostera marina, a Marine Foundation Species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 19276–19281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Marín-Guirao, L.; Ruiz, J.M.; Dattolo, E.; Garcia-Munoz, R.; Procaccini, G. Physiological and Molecular Evidence of Differential Short-Term Heat Tolerance in Mediterranean Seagrasses. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 28615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Giordani, T.; Natali, L.; Maserti, B.E.; Taddei, S.; Cavallini, A. Characterization and Expression of DNA Sequences Encoding Putative Type-II Metallothioneins in the Seagrass Posidonia oceanica. Plant Physiol. 2000, 123, 1571–1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Tuney, I.; Bengil, E.G.T.; Bengil, F.; Alan, V.; Akçalı, B. Restoration of soft-bottom habitats: Assessing transplantation success and herbivore exclusion effects on two native seagrass species in the Eastern Mediterranean. Environ. Sci. Eur. 2025, 37, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kızılkaya, Z.; Saydam, E.; Walker, K.; Tabak, T.; Miran, B.; Tüney, I.; Olguner, M.T.; Kok, F.; Alan, V.; Atay, B.; et al. Progress and challenges of multi-habitat marine restoration in the eastern Aegean Sea, Türkiye. npj Ocean Sustain. 2025, 4, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Taşkın, E.; Güreşen, A.; Bilgiç, F.; Karayalı, O.; Minareci, E.; Yazılan, Ö.; Minareci, O.; Güreşen, S.O. Bathymetric Patterns of Phytobenthic Communities and Bottom Types Along the Aegean Coasts of Türkiye. Diversity 2026, 18, 300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Göksal, E.; Öztürk, E. Gene Expression Changes in the Seagrass Cymodocea nodosa Individuals in Response to Aquatic Acidification. Turk. J. Bot. 2024, 48, 551–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Hammer, Ø.; Harper, D.A.T.; Ryan, P.D. PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontol. Electron. 2001, 4, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  22. Procaccini, G.; Ruocco, M.; Marín-Guirao, L.; Wohlrab, S.; Phillips, R.; Rossi, G.; Bouly, J.-P.; D’Esposito, D.; Sanges, R.; Duarte, C.M.; et al. Depth-Specific Fluctuations of Gene Expression and Protein Abundance Modulate the Photophysiology in the Seagrass Posidonia oceanica. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 42890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Marín-Guirao, L.; Entrambasaguas, L.; Ruiz, J.M.; Procaccini, G. Heat-Stress Induced Flowering Can Be a Potential Adaptive Response to Ocean Warming for the Iconic Seagrass Posidonia oceanica. Mol. Ecol. 2019, 28, 2486–2501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ontoria, Y.; Gonzalez-Guedes, E.; Sanmartí, N.; Bernardeau-Esteller, J.; Ruiz, J.M.; Romero, J.; Pérez, M. Interactive Effects of Global Warming and Eutrophication on a Fast-Growing Mediterranean Seagrass. Mar. Environ. Res. 2019, 145, 27–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Pazzaglia, J.; Marín-Guirao, L.; Ambrosino, L.; Pes, K.; Costa, M.; Barrote, I.; Silva, J.; Procaccini, G. Handling the Heat: Ocean Acidification Mitigates the Effects of Marine Heatwaves on Posidonia oceanica Seedlings. J. Exp. Bot. 2025, 76, 6958–6973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Eronat, C.; Sayın, E. Temporal Evolution of the Water Characteristics in the Bays Along the Eastern Coast of the Aegean Sea: Saros, İzmir, and Gökova Bays. Turk. J. Earth Sci. 2014, 23, 53–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Özmen, E. Termik Santral Soğutma Sularının Deniz Suyu Kalitesine Etkisi. Master’s Thesis, Gazi University, Ankara, Türkiye, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  28. Mulo, P.; Sakurai, I.; Aro, E.M. Strategies for psbA Gene Expression in Cyanobacteria, Green Algae and Higher Plants: From Transcription to PSII Repair. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerg. 2012, 1817, 247–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Balkıs, N.; Aksu, A.; Okuş, E.; Apak, R. Heavy metal concentrations in water, suspended matter, and sediment from Gökova Bay, Turkey. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2010, 167, 359–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Demirak, A.; Yılmaz, H.A.; Keskin, F.; Şahin, Y.; Akpolat, O. Investigation of heavy metal content in the suspended particulate matter and sediments of inner Gokova Bay and creeks. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2012, 184, 7113–7124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Eronat, C. Hydrography of the Bays Along the Eastern Coast of the Aegean Sea. Ph.D. Thesis, Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir, Türkiye, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  32. Özdemir, N.; Perktaş, M.; Döndü, M. Evaluation of Surface Water Quality Parameters by Multivariate Statistical Analyses in Northern Coastal Line of Gökova Bay (Muğla, Turkey). ADÜ Ziraat Fak. Derg. 2022, 19, 81–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Repolho, T.; Duarte, B.; Dionísio, G.; Azevedo, A.R.; Silva, J.R.; Rosa, R. Seagrass Ecophysiological Performance under Ocean Warming and Acidification. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 41443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Tutar, O.; Marín-Guirao, L.; Ruiz, J.M.; Procaccini, G. Antioxidant Response to Heat Stress in Seagrasses: A Gene Expression Study. Mar. Environ. Res. 2017, 132, 94–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Luo, Q.; Ma, Y.; Chen, Z.; Xie, H.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, L.; Ma, Y. Biochemical Responses of Hairgrass (Deschampsia caespitosa) to Hydrological Change. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 987845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Study area and sampling stations within Gökova Bay (Eastern Aegean Sea, Türkiye). Sampling locations of Posidonia oceanica meadows used for gene expression analyses. The overview map (left) shows the location of Gökova Bay within the eastern Mediterranean region, while the detailed map (right) illustrates the spatial distribution of the 17 sampling stations. The map was generated using QGIS (version 3.34.10-Prizren) software with satellite imagery provided through the Google Earth Satellite plugin. Station abbreviations correspond to those used throughout the manuscript and are listed in Table 1.
Figure 1. Study area and sampling stations within Gökova Bay (Eastern Aegean Sea, Türkiye). Sampling locations of Posidonia oceanica meadows used for gene expression analyses. The overview map (left) shows the location of Gökova Bay within the eastern Mediterranean region, while the detailed map (right) illustrates the spatial distribution of the 17 sampling stations. The map was generated using QGIS (version 3.34.10-Prizren) software with satellite imagery provided through the Google Earth Satellite plugin. Station abbreviations correspond to those used throughout the manuscript and are listed in Table 1.
Diversity 18 00449 g001
Figure 2. Hierarchical clustering heatmap of gene expression profiles across sampling stations. Clustering was performed using Euclidean distance and Ward’s linkage method. Both stations and genes were grouped according to similarities in transcriptional responses. Colors indicate the log2 x-fold expression ratios.
Figure 2. Hierarchical clustering heatmap of gene expression profiles across sampling stations. Clustering was performed using Euclidean distance and Ward’s linkage method. Both stations and genes were grouped according to similarities in transcriptional responses. Colors indicate the log2 x-fold expression ratios.
Diversity 18 00449 g002
Figure 3. Relative expression levels of stress-related genes in Posidonia oceanica collected from different stations within Gökova Bay. (A) Photosynthesis-related genes; (B) antioxidant defense genes; and (C) chaperone, heat stress, and metal tolerance-related genes. Expression values were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method and are presented relative to the reference station (Karada). Error bars indicate standard error (SE; n = 3 biological replicates).
Figure 3. Relative expression levels of stress-related genes in Posidonia oceanica collected from different stations within Gökova Bay. (A) Photosynthesis-related genes; (B) antioxidant defense genes; and (C) chaperone, heat stress, and metal tolerance-related genes. Expression values were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method and are presented relative to the reference station (Karada). Error bars indicate standard error (SE; n = 3 biological replicates).
Diversity 18 00449 g003
Figure 4. Principal component analyses (PCA) based on station-averaged gene expression data. (A) All analyzed genes combined. (B) Photosynthesis-related genes. (C) Antioxidant defense genes. (D) Stress- and metal tolerance-related genes. Percentages on the axes indicate the proportion of explained variance.
Figure 4. Principal component analyses (PCA) based on station-averaged gene expression data. (A) All analyzed genes combined. (B) Photosynthesis-related genes. (C) Antioxidant defense genes. (D) Stress- and metal tolerance-related genes. Percentages on the axes indicate the proportion of explained variance.
Diversity 18 00449 g004
Table 1. Geographic coordinates, station abbreviations, water temperatures, pH, and salinity recorded at the sampling stations within Gökova Bay.
Table 1. Geographic coordinates, station abbreviations, water temperatures, pH, and salinity recorded at the sampling stations within Gökova Bay.
Station NoStation NameAbbreviationCoordinationTemperature (°C)pHSalinity (psu)
1Karada KA36°58′35.0″ N, 27°26′43.0″ E208.739.5
2TavşanBüküTB36°59′22.6″ N 27°27′33.0″ E288.939.5
3Orak IslandOI36°59′05.3″ N 27°35′36.7″ E218.939.5
4Orak Island (Shelter)OS36°58′03.7″ N 27°36′09.0″ E278.839.5
5KısseBükü BayKB36°58′56.7″ N 27°39′02.4″ E279.539.5
6Şeytan DeresiSD36°59′51.7″ N 27°41′45.3″ E229.639.5
7Yukarı MazıYM36°59′25.6″ N 27°44′24.5″ E269.639.5
8Aşağı MazıAM36°59′28.9″ N 27°45′23.0″ E219.639.5
9ÇökertmeCK36°59′48.5″ N 27°47′18.8″ E219.639.6
10BördübetBD36°48′01.8″ N 28°02′50.6″ E228.539.6
11Bördübet BKBK36°49′37.8″ N 28°01′27.5″ E278.539.6
12AdaAD36°51′55.6″ N 28°01′38.7″ E238.639.6
137 AdalarSA36°52′31.6″ N 28°02′44.9″ E278.739.6
14KargılıbükKG36°53′09.7″ N 28°02′14.4″ E278.639.6
15LöngözLG36°56′29.8″ N 28°05′49.2″ E278.639.6
16OklukOK36°56′35.8″ N 28°09′09.3″ E278.739.6
17AkyakaAK37°01′28.8″ N 28°06′33.3″ E278.939.3
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Öztürk, E. Transcriptional Variability Among Posidonia oceanica Meadows Reveals Pronounced Spatial Heterogeneity Across Gökova Bay (Eastern Mediterranean). Diversity 2026, 18, 449. https://doi.org/10.3390/d18080449

AMA Style

Öztürk E. Transcriptional Variability Among Posidonia oceanica Meadows Reveals Pronounced Spatial Heterogeneity Across Gökova Bay (Eastern Mediterranean). Diversity. 2026; 18(8):449. https://doi.org/10.3390/d18080449

Chicago/Turabian Style

Öztürk, Esra. 2026. "Transcriptional Variability Among Posidonia oceanica Meadows Reveals Pronounced Spatial Heterogeneity Across Gökova Bay (Eastern Mediterranean)" Diversity 18, no. 8: 449. https://doi.org/10.3390/d18080449

APA Style

Öztürk, E. (2026). Transcriptional Variability Among Posidonia oceanica Meadows Reveals Pronounced Spatial Heterogeneity Across Gökova Bay (Eastern Mediterranean). Diversity, 18(8), 449. https://doi.org/10.3390/d18080449

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop