Next Article in Journal
PAK1 (p21-Activated Kinase 1) and Its Role in Neurodevelopmental Disorders—New Case Report and a Comprehensive Review
Previous Article in Journal
Mitigating Hydroxychloroquine-Induced Oxidative Liver Damage: The Roles of Adenosine Triphosphate, Liv-52, and Their Combination in Rats
Previous Article in Special Issue
Characterization and Antimicrobial Assessment of Cadmium Sulfide Nanoparticles
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Exploring Antibacterial Properties of Mechanochemically Synthesized MgAl2O4 Spinel Nanoparticles for Dental and Medical Applications

by
Alejandro L. Vega Jiménez
1,*,
Adriana-Patricia Rodríguez-Hernández
2,
América R. Vázquez-Olmos
3,
Roberto E. Luna-Ramírez
1,
Roberto Y. Sato-Berrú
3 and
Roxana Marisol Calderón-Olvera
4
1
Tissue Bioengineering Laboratory, Division of Postgraduate Studies and Research, Faculty of Dentistry, National Autonomous University of Mexico UNAM, Mexico City 04510, Mexico
2
Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Division of Graduate Studies and Research, Faculty of Dentistry, National Autonomous University of Mexico UNAM, Mexico City 04510, Mexico
3
Hybrid Systems and Nanospectroscopy, Institute of Applied Sciences and Technology, National Autonomous University of Mexico UNAM, Mexico City 04510, Mexico
4
Department of Metallic and Ceramic Materials, Institute of Materials Research, National Autonomous University of Mexico UNAM, Mexico City 04510, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27(1), 438; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27010438
Submission received: 30 November 2025 / Revised: 27 December 2025 / Accepted: 30 December 2025 / Published: 31 December 2025

Abstract

Magnesium aluminate spinel nanoparticles (MgAl2O4-S-NPs) represent a promising class of nanoceramics with potential biomedical applications due to their physicochemical stability and antimicrobial properties. This study aimed to determine the structural characteristics, composition, and biological performance of MgAl2O4 spinel nanoparticles that were synthesized via a mechanochemical method. Structural and compositional characterization was performed using X-ray diffraction (XRD) and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM). Antibacterial activity was evaluated against Helicobacter pylori and Enterococcus faecalis using bacterial viability assays. Structural and morphological analyses confirmed the successful formation of single-phase cubic MgAl2O4 with a polyhedral morphology and nanoscale size distribution. Bacterial viability was quantified through optical density measurements following exposure to MgAl2O4-S-NPs at different concentrations. The nanoparticles exhibited both bacteriostatic and bactericidal effects, with activity being demonstrated against the tested bacterial strains. Mechanochemically synthesized MgAl2O4-S-NPs are promising candidates for biomedical applications, including dental materials, antimicrobial coatings, and infection-control strategies. Overall, the findings highlight the potential of MgAl2O4-S-NPs as effective antimicrobial agents that can be produced through an environmentally friendly synthesis route.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Magnesium aluminate (MgAl2O4) spinel nanostructures exhibit promising properties for dental applications. These nanoceramics demonstrate excellent chemical, thermal, mechanical, and optical characteristics [1]. MgAl2O4 spinel scaffolds, when combined with hydroxyapatite nanorods, show potential for biomedical use due to their biocompatibility and structural integrity [2]. Nanostructured MgAl2O4 spinel can be fabricated with a uniform grain size distribution, resulting in high room-temperature strength, improved erosion resistance, and near-theoretical in-line IR transmission [3]. Transparent MgAl2O4 spinel nanoceramics can be produced at relatively low temperatures (500–700 °C) under high pressure, yielding average grain sizes below 100 nm and high transparency, despite relative densities below 99% [4]. These properties make MgAl2O4 spinel nanostructures suitable for various applications, including optically transparent windows and armors. With respect to their antibacterial properties, there is limited information available. Recently, a study reported the synthesis of MgO/MgAl2O4 nanoparticles using a hydrothermal technique and evaluated their activity against four Gram-positive strains—Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, Micrococcus luteus, and Bacillus subtilis—and four Gram-negative strains: Serratia marcescens, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Klebsiella pneumoniae [5]. However, there are no reports about their antibacterial properties and potential use against Enterococcus faecalis and Helicobacter pylori, commensal pathogenic species associated with severe human infections [6].
It is known that magnesium-based nanostructures exert antimicrobial effects that may support dental caries prevention [7]. Zein-coated magnesium oxide nanoparticles, tested via Kirby–Bauer and direct contact methods at concentrations of 1% and 2%, have been shown to inhibit S. aureus, Streptococcus mutans, E. faecalis, and Candida albicans [7]. Magnesium-doped hydroxyapatite (at doses from 0.009 to 5 mg/mL) reduced biofilm formation by P. aeruginosa and S. aureus and moderately suppressed C. albicans, while a PMMA/hydroxyapatite/magnesium oxide nanocomposite yielded inhibition zones of 1 to 5 mm against S. mutans [8]. Mechanisms of action include metal ion release, oxidative stress induction, and disruption of bacterial membranes; one report also noted improved mineral content and mechanical properties in dental adhesives upon nanoparticle incorporation [9,10]. Also, they have been reported to inhibit oral bacterial growth and promote osteoblast viability, indicating their dual functionality in dental applications [11,12]. Although none of the studies directly evaluated MgAl2O4 nanostructures, the antimicrobial outcomes of closely related magnesium-based systems suggest that such formulations hold promise for reducing oral bacterial activity in dental materials.
The purpose of this work is to demonstrate the potential antibacterial properties against Enterococcus faecalis and Helicobacter pylori of the mechanochemically synthesized MgAl2O4 spinel nanostructures.

2. Results

2.1. Synthesis and Characterization of MgAl2O4/S-NPs

Using the mechanosynthesis approach, MgAl2O4/S-NPs were obtained with the below characteristics. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern is depicted in Figure 1 the peaks in 2θ (°) values at 19.0 (111), 31.5 (220), 37.0 (311), 45.1 (400), 56.0 (422), 59.7 (511), and 65.6 (440) can be accurately indexed to cubic spinel-structured MgAl2O4 (JCPDS File No. 075-1796). Other peaks that could indicate the presence of intermediate products, such as Al2O3 and MgO, have not been observed in the pattern, confirming the single-phase nature of the as-prepared MgAl2O4/S-NPs. Furthermore, the average crystallite size of MgAl2O4 was estimated using the Scherrer equation to be 11 ± 2 nm.
High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM) micrographs provided additional information, showing polyhedral nanoparticles with some degree of agglomeration and sizes below 100 nm. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) showed the presence of magnesium (Mg), aluminum (Al), and oxygen (O), with no other elements being detected. The interplanar distances coincide with the reflections of the crystal structure of the MgAl2O4 (Figure 2a–d).

2.2. Antibacterial Test

Both H. pylori and E. faecalis strains exhibited robust positive growth, confirming their suitability as positive controls (+) for the antimicrobial susceptibility assays. For H. pylori, susceptibility to MgAl2O4 nanoparticles was observed at concentrations of 30,000, 30, 15, and 5 µg/mL, with statistically significant differences (p < 0.001) relative to the positive control, except at 300 µg/mL, where no significant difference was detected (Figure 3, Table 1). Similarly, E. faecalis demonstrated susceptibility at 30,000, 30, 15, and 5 µg/mL (p < 0.001), and at 300 µg/mL (p < 0.01), when compared with the positive control (Figure 3, Table 1).
Cell viability recovery outcomes are shown in Figure 4 and Figure 5 at 30,000 µg/mL. Both bacterial strains exhibited positive growth; however, this concentration presented a marked reduction in OD595 nm values relative to the positive control (Figure 3 and Table 1).
At 300 µg/mL, H. pylori still demonstrated positive growth, whereas E. faecalis exhibited only two CFU. At 30 µg/mL, recovery decreased to three CFU for H. pylori and one CFU for E. faecalis. This is reason to consider 30 µg/mL as the minimum inhibitory concentration, with more than 90% of inhibition cells for H. pylori (0.483 − 0.0163/0.483 × 100 = 96.62%) and an inhibitory concentration higher than 90% MIC90 for E. faecalis (0.558 − 0.076 /0.558 × 100 = 86.37%); both species exhibited bacteriostatic properties at the 30 µg/mL concentration by the countable recovery of colonies.
At 15 µg/mL, no CFU growth was detected for either strain. At the 5 µg/mL concentration, H. pylori still demonstrated uncountable positive growth in CFU, whereas E. faecalis exhibited no growth in CFU, indicating strong bactericidal activity at the low concentration. With the last results, we considered 15 µg/mL as the minimum bactericidal concentration for H. pylori and 5 µg/mL for E. faecalis, with 96.06% (0.483 − 0.015/0.483 × 100) and 96.89 (0 − 0.558/0.558 × 100) bacterial inhibition, respectively.
Overall, these findings demonstrate that MgAl2O4/S-NPs exert consistent bacteriostatic and bactericidal activity against both bacteria evaluated.
The table of the broth microdilution assay shows the OD595 nm values of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) and Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis). The results represent the mean OD595 nm values (±standard error of the mean) obtained from triplicate assays, compared pairwise with the average positive growth controls (104 cells) using Student’s t-test (Sig. t-S). Abbreviations: SE, standard error of the mean; CFU, colony-forming unit.

3. Discussion

The characteristics of the MgAl2O4/S-NPs that were synthesized in this study using a solvent-free, environmentally friendly mechanochemical method are consistent with findings from other studies that have reported the formation of MgAl2O4 spinel crystallographic phases, although variations in particle size and synthesis methods have been observed [5,13,14,15,16].
The mechanochemically synthesized MgAl2O4 spinel nanoparticles (MgAl2O4/S-NPs) exhibit effective bacteriostatic and bactericidal activity against Helicobacter pylori and Enterococcus faecalis at relatively low concentrations (MIC = 30 µg/mL; MBC from 5–15 µg/mL). This result may be attributed to the intrinsic characteristics of the bacterial strains used in this study. H. pylori is a Gram-negative microaerophilic bacterium with a cell envelope composed of an inner membrane, a periplasmic peptidoglycan layer, and an outer membrane consisting of lipopolysaccharides and phospholipids [17]. In contrast, E. faecalis is a Gram-positive facultative aerobic bacterium with a cytoplasmic lipid membrane surrounded by a thick cell wall composed of peptidoglycan, teichoic acid, and a surface polysaccharide antigen [18,19].
It can be inferred that the electrostatic nature of the H. pylori cell wall makes it more susceptible to the penetration of MgAl2O4/S-NPs through its envelope, thereby enhancing their bacteriostatic activity at lower concentrations [20]. At higher concentrations, however, nanoparticle aggregation may occur, forming nanoclusters that adhere irregularly to the bacterial surface and hinder intracellular penetration, as previously reported in the literature [20,21,22].
Although not directly focused on MgAl2O4, other studies have reported antimicrobial effects of metallic and metal oxide nanoparticles, such as silver, gold, copper, and zinc oxide, that are consistent with the present findings. The size, shape, and concentration of nanoparticles strongly influence their interaction with bacterial membranes, playing a key role in their antimicrobial performance [23,24].
For example, green-synthesized ZnO nanoparticles have been shown to exert potent antibacterial and antibiofilm activity against multidrug-resistant E. coli, highlighting the ability of metal oxide nanostructures to disrupt bacterial growth through mechanisms likely involving surface defects and reactive oxygen species generation (ZnO-NPs using Stevia rebaudiana as a reducing/capping agent) [25]. Likewise, composite oxide nanoparticles such as MgO, ZnO, and chitosan hydroxyapatite systems have demonstrated effectiveness against carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative clinical isolates, underscoring that mixed oxide systems can be active against both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria when appropriately engineered [26].
In the context of dental materials, MgO nanoparticles obtained by mechanosynthesis have been evaluated for antibacterial activity against S. aureus, E. faecalis, and E. coli, as well as for compatibility with osteoblast cells, indicating that magnesium-based nanomaterials can combine antimicrobial functionality with potential biocompatibility, which is relevant to clinical use [12]. Although the specific bacterial strains differ, these results support the broader observation that magnesium-containing oxide nanoparticles can exert antibacterial effects across multiple pathogens.
Direct comparisons with other MgAl2O4 systems are also informative. Hydrothermally synthesized MgAl2O4 nanoparticles with sizes in a similar range (~12 nm) have been reported to exhibit antibacterial activity against S. aureus, although specific quantitative comparisons (MIC/MBC) are not universally provided in the literature [14]. Rare-earth-doped MgAl2O4:Tb3+ nanophosphors synthesized by sol–gel methods were found to show antimicrobial activity against E. coli, S. aureus, and C. albicans, with inhibitory effects increasing at higher dopant concentrations, suggesting that modifications to spinel composition can enhance antimicrobial potency, likely through their altered surface chemistry and electronic structure, which influence interaction with microbial cells [27]. For instance, a recent study reported the eco-friendly synthesis of MgO/MgAl2O4 core/shell nanostructures via a hydrothermal route and evaluated their activity against a broader panel of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial strains, confirming that these nanoparticles exhibited antibacterial effects across diverse pathogens. The authors reported particle sizes predominantly in the range of 90–150 nm and concluded that these were well-optimized for antimicrobial performance, underscoring that nanoscale structural properties and surface area play critical roles in antibacterial efficacy [5].
These comparative findings highlight that antibacterial activity in metal oxide and spinel nanoparticles correlates with phase purity, defect chemistry, particle size, and surface properties rather than with the mere presence of a specific crystal structure. In MgAl2O4/S-NPs, the small crystallite size (~11 nm) and polydispersity observed by HR-TEM likely contribute to a high surface area and an increased density of surface defect sites, which could facilitate electron transfer, surface redox reactions, and the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS).
These previously reported nanoparticles share a mechanism of action that is similar to MgAl2O4 NPs, mainly through the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which are considered a major contributor to antibacterial activity in clinical dentistry [9,20,23,24].
Considering potential factors that could facilitate reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in nanostructured oxide materials, recent studies on doped and defect-rich magnesium oxide systems provide valuable mechanistic insight. For instance, Yin et al. demonstrated that microwave-assisted green synthesis of K-doped MgO nanoparticles leads to a high density of surface oxygen vacancies, which promote ROS generation and enhance antibacterial performance against E. coli and S. aureus, thereby directly linking defect sites to ROS-mediated biocidal effects [28]. Similarly, investigations of Li-doped MgO have shown that synthesis parameters such as fuel type and dopant incorporation significantly influence microstructure and surface defect density, implying a central role of defect-mediated ROS mechanisms in antibacterial activity [29]. In parallel, studies on oxide spinel materials emphasize the strong influence of composition and defect structure on electronic states and surface reactivity. First-principles analyses of composition-dependent spinel systems, such as ZnO·nAl2O3, reveal that slight deviations from the ideal cation distribution and compositional variations markedly alter local bonding environments and electronic structure [30], while experimental evaluations of composition-dependent thermophysical and mechanical properties further underscore the sensitivity of defect populations to compositional changes in related spinel systems [31]. In the context of mechanochemically synthesized MgAl2O4 spinel nanoparticles, trace impurities originating from precursors or milling media—although below the detection limits of XRD—may introduce localized energy states, while oxygen non-stoichiometry and compositional variations suggested by EDS data can generate oxygen vacancies and cation disorder within the lattice. Together, these defect-related features act as active sites for molecular oxygen activation and electron transfer, thereby enhancing ROS formation and plausibly contributing to the observed antibacterial behavior.
H. pylori has been shown to be susceptible to antibiotics in vitro but often exhibits resistance in vivo, which is believed to result from limited drug penetration to the infection site at effective antimicrobial concentrations [32]. This bacterium has been reported to develop resistance to nitroimidazoles, macrolides, quinolones, and rifamycins [32]. Similarly, E. faecalis is recognized as one of the main causative agents of nosocomial infections and has shown resistance to multiple antibiotics, including ampicillin, gentamicin, streptomycin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, erythromycin, vancomycin, minocycline, and tetracyclines [33].
The literature suggests that nanoparticles may enhance antibiotic efficacy by altering bacterial cell wall permeability in both H. pylori and E. faecalis. By disrupting the structural integrity of their cell envelopes, these microorganisms become more susceptible to conventional antimicrobials [32,33].
Nanoparticles have broad applications in dentistry, where they have been incorporated into restorative materials such as adhesives and composite resins to prevent secondary caries and biofilm formation. Examples include mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) modified with nanoparticles, which have been used in the fabrication of complete dentures [34]. In endodontics, nanoparticles could serve as irrigant agents or as coatings for gutta-percha cones used in root canal obturation, improving disinfection efficiency [34].
Overall, the results of this study are consistent with increasing evidence showing that nanostructured metal oxides, including mechanochemically synthesized MgAl2O4 nanoparticles, can exhibit pronounced antibacterial activity at relatively low concentrations, with effectiveness that is comparable to or greater than those reported for other oxide-based nanomaterials. The antibacterial behavior observed herein is likely associated with a synergistic interplay between a high specific surface area, enhanced surface reactivity, and defect-mediated reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, which are intrinsic to the nanostructured spinel framework, rather than ion release or bulk toxicity mechanisms.
These findings highlight the potential of MgAl2O4 nanoparticles for application in dental and clinical biomaterials, particularly considering their efficacy at the lowest evaluated concentrations, which may support cost-effective implementation. However, further investigations are required to assess their activity against antibiotic-resistant bacteria, such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), as well as against biofilm-forming microorganisms [35]. In addition, comprehensive in vivo and cellular-level studies are necessary to evaluate cytotoxicity and long-term biological interactions, ensuring the safety and translational viability of these nanomaterials for biomedical applications.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Synthesis and Characterization of MgAl2O4/S-NPs

The MgAl2O4 nanoparticles used in this study were synthesized via a mechanochemical route based on high-energy and continuous milling of precursor oxides. Commercial magnesium oxide (MgO) and aluminum oxide (Al2O3) were used as starting materials and mixed in a stoichiometric molar ratio of 1:1. Prior to combined milling, each oxide was ground separately in an agate mortar for approximately 20 min, or until no further observable changes in particle texture were detected, to ensure homogenization and particle size reduction. Subsequently, the MgO and Al2O3 powders were combined and milled together for an additional 20 min to promote intimate contact and solid-state diffusion between the reactants. The resulting powder mixture was then subjected to thermal treatment in a conventional oven at 800 °C for 2 h to facilitate the formation of the MgAl2O4 spinel phase. After calcination, the product was washed sequentially 3 times with deionized water and acetone to remove residual impurities and loosely bound species, followed by drying prior to characterization. The formation of nano-MgAl2O4 can be described by the following solid-state reaction:
MgO + Al 2 O 3 Milling + 800   ° C MgAl 2 O 4
The resulting powders were calcined at 800 °C for 2 h, followed by sequential washing with distilled water and acetone. After each washing step, the product was separated by centrifugation at 3000 rpm.
For the characterization of the synthesized nanoparticles, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) were employed to determine the morphology, crystalline structure, and chemical bonding characteristics, respectively.

4.2. Antibacterial Test

4.2.1. Bacterial Strains and Culture Conditions

Lyophilized strains of H. pylori (ATCC 43629) and E. faecalis (ATCC 51299) were used in this study. The strains were rehydrated using Mycoplasma broth medium and subsequently cultured on Trypticase Soy Agar (TSA) plates to assess purity and cell viability. A total of 40 TSA Petri dishes were prepared for these preliminary evaluations.

4.2.2. Preparation of Antibiotic Stock Solutions

The antibiotic stock solutions were prepared using amoxicillin at a 1 mg/mL concentration. It was dissolved in sterile water in a 125 mL screw-cap Erlenmeyer flask. Once fully dissolved, the solutions were sterilized by filtration using 0.2 μm syringe filters and aliquoted into 2 mL cryovials. The aliquots were stored at −20 °C until use in the broth microdilution assays.

4.2.3. Preparation of Bacterial Inocula

After confirming bacterial growth on TSA plates, colonies were gently scraped and suspended in Trypticase Soy Broth (TSB). Each 1.8 mL microdilution tube was filled with 1 mL of the suspension, and the first tube (“OD1”) was used for optical density calibration. The optical density (OD) measured at 600 nm corresponded to an approximate concentration of 109 CFU/mL.
Two sets of sterile 1.8 mL microdilution tubes were prepared and labeled from 1 to 5, with an additional tube containing only medium serving as the negative control for each strain. Serial dilutions were performed to obtain a final concentration of 104 CFU/mL. To ensure homogeneous dispersion of bacterial cells, brief intermittent sonication (<2 s) was applied, with sterilization of the probe before each use.
For the 108 CFU/mL dilution, 0.9 mL of TSB was mixed with 0.1 mL of the OD1 suspension. This procedure was repeated to obtain subsequent dilutions down to 104 CFU/mL, ensuring sufficient volume for the microdilution assays.

4.2.4. Preparation and Dilution of MgAl2O4/S-NPs

To evaluate the antimicrobial activity of MgAl2O4/S-NPs, five sterile 1.8 mL microdilution tubes were prepared for each bacterial strain and labeled from 1 to 5. Nanoparticle suspensions were prepared at concentrations ranging from 30 mg/mL to 0.005 mg/mL using molecular-grade water as the diluent. All procedures were performed under aseptic conditions.

4.2.5. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Assay (Broth Microdilution Method)

The antimicrobial activity of MgAl2O4/S-NPs was evaluated using the broth microdilution method in sterile 96-well microplates. A volume of 100 μL of the amoxicillin solution (1 mg/mL) was added to columns 6 and 12, specifically in rows A, C, E, G, and H, to serve as antibiotic controls. Subsequently, 100 μL of the H. pylori suspension (104 CFU/mL) was added to wells in columns 1–6 (rows A, C, and E), whereas 100 μL of the E. faecalis suspension was added to wells in columns 7–12 (rows A, C, and E).
All pipetting procedures were performed under sterile conditions using a Bunsen burner to maintain aseptic technique. The microplates were sealed with parafilm and incubated at 37 °C for 48 h under aerobic conditions with gentle agitation at 80 rpm. Each experimental well was performed in triplicate.

4.2.6. Recovery and Assessment of Cell Viability

After 48 h of incubation, the microplates were analyzed using a FilterMax F5 microplate reader (Molecular Devices, LLC. 3860N.First Street, San Jose, CA, USA) at 595 nm to assess bacterial growth. From each assay, a 100 μL aliquot was collected from the first triplicate well and cultured on TSA plates to observe bacterial growth viability after 42 h of incubation.

4.3. Data Analysis

OD values at 595 nm were averaged from triplicates, and the standard error of the mean per measurement was calculated and statistically compared with the corresponding positive growth controls for each strain (104 CFU/mL). Obtained OD values were analyzed using a normalized Shapiro–Wilk test to assess the normality of the distribution. Statistical analyses were performed using the parametric Student’s t-test with a 95% confidence interval (CI), employing IBM SPSS Statistics v21 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
Agar viability and colony-forming units (CFU) were manually counted using a manual colony counter and a stereomicroscope. Results were used to determine the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC), defined as an OD reduction with statistical differences and a visible reduction in bacterial growth with countable colonies of the recovery of viability. The Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) was defined as an OD reduction with statistical differences, and a complete absence of CFU growth was interpreted as bactericidal activity. For the interpretation of breakpoints of antibacterial inhibition at the 50 and 90% percentile (MIC50, MIC90), ODs were calculated using the following equation: OD control − OD sample /OD control × 100 to obtain % of bacterial inhibition.

5. Conclusions

In the present study, MgAl2O4/S-NPs synthesized via a mechanochemical method demonstrated a bacteriostatic effect at the tested concentrations against two antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains of dental and medical relevance. These findings provide evidence supporting the potential use of MgAl2O4/S-NPs in the development of new therapeutic strategies against multidrug-resistant pathogens in dental and medical practice, complementing the antibacterial behavior observed in microbiological assays.
Further research is recommended to investigate the application of MgAl2O4/S-NPs under varied mechanosynthesis parameters to obtain different particle sizes, as well as to evaluate a broader range of concentrations and exposure times. Additional studies incorporating combinatory approaches and in vivo cytotoxicity assessments are also required to confirm their efficacy and potential applicability in medical and dental treatments.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.L.V.J.; methodology, A.L.V.J., A.-P.R.-H., and A.R.V.-O.; software, A.L.V.J. and A.-P.R.-H.; validation, A.L.V.J., A.-P.R.-H., and A.R.V.-O.; formal analysis A.L.V.J., A.-P.R.-H., and A.R.V.-O.; investigation, A.L.V.J., A.-P.R.-H., A.R.V.-O., R.E.L.-R., R.Y.S.-B., and R.M.C.-O.; resources, A.L.V.J., A.-P.R.-H., and R.M.C.-O.; data curation, A.L.V.J., A.-P.R.-H., and A.R.V.-O.; writing—original draft preparation, A.L.V.J.; writing—review and editing, A.L.V.J., A.-P.R.-H., and A.R.V.-O.; visualization, A.L.V.J.; supervision, A.L.V.J.; project administration, A.L.V.J.; funding acquisition, A.L.V.J., A.-P.R.-H., and R.M.C.-O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Autonomous University of Mexico [UNAM-DGAPA-PAPIIT IN109426, IA200624 and IA102325].

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Adriana Tejeda-Cruz for her technical support with XRD measurements at IIM-UNAM. The authors also acknowledge Shani Orrala Alcántara and Leticia Cruz Fonseca at UNAM for their assistance, as well as the contribution of the Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, School of Dentistry, National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), Mexico City, Mexico, certified under the Quality Management System International Organization for Standardization according to ISO 9001:2015.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ganesh, I. A review on magnesium aluminate (MgAl2O4) spinel: Synthesis, processing and applications. Int. Mater. Rev. 2013, 58, 63–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Biswas, P.; Sharma, A.; Krishnan, M.; Johnson, R.; Mohan, M.K. Fabrication of MgAl2O4 spinel scaffolds and sonochemical synthesis and deposition of hydroxyapatite nanorods. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2016, 99, 1544–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mroz, T.; Goldman, L.M.; Gledhill, A.D.; Li, D.; Padture, N.P. Nanostructured, infrared-transparent magnesium-aluminate spinel with superior mechanical properties. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 2012, 9, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lu, T.; Chang, X.; Qi, J.; Luo, X. Low-temperature high-pressure preparation of transparent nanocrystalline MgAl2O4 ceramics. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 88, 117579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Moshafi, M.H.; Rajaei, P.; Ranjbar, M. Eco-friendly synthesis of MgO/MgAl2O4 core/shell nanostructures and their antimicrobial evaluation against pathogenic microbial strains. Iran. J. Chem. Chem. Eng. 2023, 42, 1126–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Strickertsson, J.A.; Desler, C.; Martin-Bertelsen, T.; Machado, A.M.D.; Wadstrøm, T.; Winther, O.; Rasmussen, L.J.; Friis-Hansen, L. Enterococcus faecalis infection causes inflammation, intracellular OXPHOS-independent ROS production, and DNA damage in human gastric cancer cells. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e63147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Naguib, G.H.; Hosny, K.M.; Hassan, A.H.; Al Hazmi, F.; Al Dharrab, A.; Alkhalidi, H.M.; Hamed, M.T.; Alnowaiser, A.M.; Pashley, D.H. Zein-based magnesium oxide nanoparticles: Assessment of antimicrobial activity for dental implications. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 2018, 31, 245–250. [Google Scholar]
  8. Predoi, D.; Iconaru, S.L.; Predoi, M.V.; Stan, G.E.; Buton, N. Synthesis, characterization, and antimicrobial activity of magnesium-doped hydroxyapatite suspensions. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Vega-Jiménez, A.L.; Vázquez-Olmos, A.R.; Acosta-Gío, E.; Álvarez-Pérez, M.A. In vitro antimicrobial activity evaluation of metal oxide nanoparticles. In Nanoemulsions—Properties, Fabrications and Applications; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nizami, M.Z.I.; Xu, V.W.; Yin, I.X.; Yu, O.Y.; Chu, C.-H. Metal and metal oxide nanoparticles in caries prevention: A review. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 3446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rodríguez-Hernández, A.-P.; Vega-Jiménez, A.L.; Vázquez-Olmos, A.R.; Ortega-Maldonado, M.; Ximenez-Fyvie, L.-A. Antibacterial properties in vitro of magnesium oxide nanoparticles for dental applications. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Vega-Jiménez, A.L.; González-Alva, P.; Rodríguez-Hernández, A.-P.; Vázquez-Olmos, A.R.; Paz-Díaz, B. Oxide nanoparticles based on magnesium as a potential dental tool to inhibit bacterial activity and promote osteoblast viability. Dent. Mater. J. 2024, 43, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Khan, S.A.; Mohd Zain, Z.; Siddiqui, Z.; Khan, W.; Aabid, A.; Baig, M.; Malik, M.A. Development of magnesium aluminate (MgAl2O4) nanoparticles for refractory crucible application. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0296793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chitra, V.P.; Vasantharani, P.; Sivakumar, G.; Santhamoorthy, M.; Guganathan, L.; Devanesan, S.; AlSalhi, M.S.; Palaniappan, S.K. Preparation and characterization of MgAl2O4 nanoparticles by hydrothermal method and their photocatalytic and antibacterial activity applications. Ceram. Int. 2024, 50, 32737–32747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yeşiltepe-Özçelik, D.; Burgun, U.; Kaya, F.; Uysal, E.; Derin, B.; Schaefer, A.; Carlsson, P.-A.; Gümüşlü-Gür, G.; Sarıoğlan, A.; Gürmen, S. Synthesis of MgAl2O4 by sol–gel method and investigation of catalytic performances in CO2 methanation. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2025; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Winter, R.; Quinten, M.; Dierstein, A.; Hempelmann, R.; Altherr, A.; Veith, M. Agglomeration of nano-MgAl2O4 spinel from microemulsion and CVD techniques. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2000, 33, 507–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Andrades Ortega, M. Prevalencia de la Colonización de Helicobacter Pylori en Estudiantes de Odontología. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  18. Todd Rose, F.O.; Darnell, R.L.; Morris, S.M.; Rose, O.E.; Paxie, O.; Campbell, G.; Cook, G.M.; Gebhard, S. The two-component system CroRS acts as a master regulator of cell envelope homeostasis to confer antimicrobial tolerance in Enterococcus faecalis. Mol. Microbiol. 2023, 120, 408–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. García-Solache, M.; Rice, L.B. The Enterococcus: A model of adaptability to its environment. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2019, 32, e00058-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Vázquez-Olmos, A.R.; Vega-Jiménez, A.L.; Paz-Díaz, B. Mecanosíntesis y efecto antimicrobiano de óxidos metálicos nanoestructurados. Mundo Nano 2018, 11, 29–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Atehortúa-Rendón, J.D.; Martínez, A.; Pérez-Cala, T.L. Descripción de la resistencia de Helicobacter pylori a seis antibióticos de uso frecuente en Colombia. Rev. Colomb. Gastroenterol. 2020, 35, 351–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Adón, A.Y.; Echavarría, H.M. Enterococcus Faecalis: Factores de Virulencia e Importancia Clínica en el Área Odontológica; Universidad Nacional Pedro Henríquez Ureña: Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  23. Bhargavi, K.; Bose, A. Synthesis of TiO2 and MgAl2O4 nanocomposites for the enhancement of antibacterial applications. J. Mines Met. Fuels 2023, 71, 1068–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ahón-Ríos, K.A.; Rengifo-Méndez, F.; Iglesias-Osores, S.; Mercado-Martínez, P.E. Actividad antibacterial de nanopartículas de óxido de zinc sobre Listeria monocytogenes ATCC 7644. Rev. Cuerpo Méd. Hosp. Nac. Almanzor Aguinaga Asenjo 2022, 15, 71–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Elabbasy, M.T.; El Bayomi, R.M.; Abdelkarim, E.A.; Hafez, A.E.-S.E.; Othman, M.S.; Ghoniem, M.E.; Samak, M.A.; Alshammari, M.H.; Almarshadi, F.A.; Elsamahy, T.; et al. Antibacterial and antibiofilm activity of green-synthesized zinc oxide nanoparticles against multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli isolated from retail fish. Molecules 2025, 30, 768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Ahmed, S.J.; Ali, S.M.; Khedr, M.A.; Emara, M.; Hamed, S. Assessment of MgO, ZnO, chitosan hydroxyapatite and silver hydroxyapatite nanoparticles against carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative Egyptian clinical isolates. BMC Microbiol. 2025, 25, 632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Rani, S.D.; Shamsudee, S.P.; Kumar, R.G.K. Studies on the structure and antimicrobial activity of MgAl2O4:Tb3+ nanophosphors synthesized by polymerised sol–gel method. Biol. Forum 2023, 15, 939–942. [Google Scholar]
  28. Yin, Z.; Li, S.; Liu, Z.; Yu, C.; Wang, A.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, S.; Ma, C. Microwave-assisted green synthesis of Mg0.95K0.05O nanoparticles: An effective strategy for enhanced antimicrobial activity. Ceram. Int. 2025, 51, 54914–54927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yin, Z.; Li, X.; Li, S.; Yu, C.; Wang, A.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, S.; Ma, C. Investigation of fuel type on the microstructure and antibacterial activity of Li-doped MgO nanoparticles. Ceram. Int. 2024, 50, 1633–1642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xu, P.; Wang, H.; Ren, L.; Tu, B.; Wang, W.; Fu, Z. Theoretical study on composition-dependent properties of ZnO·nAl2O3 spinels. Part I: Optical and dielectric. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2021, 104, 5099–5109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Xu, P.; Wang, H.; Ren, L.; Tu, B.; Wang, W.; Fu, Z. Theoretical study on composition-dependent properties of ZnO·nAl2O3 spinels. Part II: Mechanical and thermophysical. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2021, 104, 6455–6466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Pajares García, J.; Pajares-Villarroya, R.; Gisbert, J. Helicobacter pylori: Resistencia a los antibióticos. Rev. Esp. Enferm. Dig. 2007, 99, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Medell, M.; Hart, M.; Batista, M.L. Sensibilidad antimicrobiana in vitro en aislamientos de Enterococcus faecalis y Enterococcus faecium obtenidos de pacientes hospitalizados. Biomédica 2014, 34, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gronwald, B.; Kozłowska, L.; Kijak, K.; Lietz-Kijak, D.; Skomro, P.; Gronwald, K.; Gronwald, H. Nanoparticles in dentistry—Current literature review. Coatings 2023, 13, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Li, J.; Cheng, F.; Wei, X.; Bai, Y.; Wang, Q.; Li, B.; Zhou, Y.; Zhai, B.; Zhou, X.; Wang, W.; et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): Resistance, prevalence, and coping strategies. Antibiotics 2025, 14, 771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. XRD pattern showing peaks at 2θ values of 19.0 (111), 31.5 (220), 37.0 (311), 45.1 (400), 56.0 (422), 59.7 (511), and 65.6 (440), corresponding to the cubic spinel structure of MgAl2O4 (JCPDS No. 075-1796). No additional reflections associated with possible intermediate phases such as Al2O3 or MgO were detected, supporting the formation of single-phase MgAl2O4/S-NPs.
Figure 1. XRD pattern showing peaks at 2θ values of 19.0 (111), 31.5 (220), 37.0 (311), 45.1 (400), 56.0 (422), 59.7 (511), and 65.6 (440), corresponding to the cubic spinel structure of MgAl2O4 (JCPDS No. 075-1796). No additional reflections associated with possible intermediate phases such as Al2O3 or MgO were detected, supporting the formation of single-phase MgAl2O4/S-NPs.
Ijms 27 00438 g001
Figure 2. (a,b) High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM) images of MgAl2O4/S-NPs revealing polyhedral nanoparticles exhibiting slight agglomeration and measuring under 100 nm. (c) The measured interplanar spacings correspond to the characteristic reflections of the MgAl2O4 crystal structure. (d) Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) confirming the presence of magnesium (Mg), aluminum (Al), and oxygen (O), with no additional elements being detected.
Figure 2. (a,b) High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM) images of MgAl2O4/S-NPs revealing polyhedral nanoparticles exhibiting slight agglomeration and measuring under 100 nm. (c) The measured interplanar spacings correspond to the characteristic reflections of the MgAl2O4 crystal structure. (d) Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) confirming the presence of magnesium (Mg), aluminum (Al), and oxygen (O), with no additional elements being detected.
Ijms 27 00438 g002
Figure 3. Graph of the broth microdilution assay showing the OD595nm values of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) and Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis). † indicates p < 0.01, and ‡ indicates p < 0.001.
Figure 3. Graph of the broth microdilution assay showing the OD595nm values of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) and Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis). † indicates p < 0.01, and ‡ indicates p < 0.001.
Ijms 27 00438 g003
Figure 4. Results of H. pylori cell viability at different concentrations of MgAl2O4/S-NPs. It can be observed that at concentrations of 30 and 30,000 µg/ mL, there was a presence of viable bacteria (CFU).
Figure 4. Results of H. pylori cell viability at different concentrations of MgAl2O4/S-NPs. It can be observed that at concentrations of 30 and 30,000 µg/ mL, there was a presence of viable bacteria (CFU).
Ijms 27 00438 g004
Figure 5. Results of E. faecalis cell viability at different concentrations of MgAl2O4/S-NPs. It can be observed that at concentrations of 30 and 30,000 µg/ mL, there was a presence of viable bacteria and CFU. TSA: Trypticase Soya Agar.
Figure 5. Results of E. faecalis cell viability at different concentrations of MgAl2O4/S-NPs. It can be observed that at concentrations of 30 and 30,000 µg/ mL, there was a presence of viable bacteria and CFU. TSA: Trypticase Soya Agar.
Ijms 27 00438 g005
Table 1. Values of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) and Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis).
Table 1. Values of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) and Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis).
H. pyloriMediaSEMSig. t-SAgar Viability CFU
C (-) H. p0.4830.0060.6039(+)
Amoxi 1000 µg/mL + H. p0.03500.0005(-)
MgAl2O4/S-NPs 30,000 µg/mL000.0004(+)
MgAl2O4/S-NPs 300 µg/mL000.0549(+)
MgAl2O4/S-NPs 30 µg/mL0.0160.0040.00053
MgAl2O4/S-NPs 15 µg/mL0.0340.0070.0005(-)
MgAl2O4/S-NPs 5 µg/mL0.0150.0080.0005(+)
E. faecalisMediaSEMSig. t-SAgar Viability CFU
C (-) E. f0.5580.0110.0704(+)
Amoxi 1000 µg/mL + E. f 0.04600.0002(-)
MgAl2O4/S-NPs 30,000 µg/mL00.0190.0000(+)
MgAl2O4/S-NPs 300 µg/mL000.00812
MgAl2O4/S-NPs 30 µg/mL0.0760.0050.00031
MgAl2O4/S-NPs 15 µg/mL000.0001(-)
MgAl2O4/S-NPs 5 µg/mL00.0070.0003(-)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vega Jiménez, A.L.; Rodríguez-Hernández, A.-P.; Vázquez-Olmos, A.R.; Luna-Ramírez, R.E.; Sato-Berrú, R.Y.; Calderón-Olvera, R.M. Exploring Antibacterial Properties of Mechanochemically Synthesized MgAl2O4 Spinel Nanoparticles for Dental and Medical Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27, 438. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27010438

AMA Style

Vega Jiménez AL, Rodríguez-Hernández A-P, Vázquez-Olmos AR, Luna-Ramírez RE, Sato-Berrú RY, Calderón-Olvera RM. Exploring Antibacterial Properties of Mechanochemically Synthesized MgAl2O4 Spinel Nanoparticles for Dental and Medical Applications. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2026; 27(1):438. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27010438

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vega Jiménez, Alejandro L., Adriana-Patricia Rodríguez-Hernández, América R. Vázquez-Olmos, Roberto E. Luna-Ramírez, Roberto Y. Sato-Berrú, and Roxana Marisol Calderón-Olvera. 2026. "Exploring Antibacterial Properties of Mechanochemically Synthesized MgAl2O4 Spinel Nanoparticles for Dental and Medical Applications" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 27, no. 1: 438. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27010438

APA Style

Vega Jiménez, A. L., Rodríguez-Hernández, A.-P., Vázquez-Olmos, A. R., Luna-Ramírez, R. E., Sato-Berrú, R. Y., & Calderón-Olvera, R. M. (2026). Exploring Antibacterial Properties of Mechanochemically Synthesized MgAl2O4 Spinel Nanoparticles for Dental and Medical Applications. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 27(1), 438. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27010438

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop