Next Article in Journal
Identification of Candidate Genes for Red-Eyed (Albinism) Domestic Guppies Using Genomic and Transcriptomic Analyses
Next Article in Special Issue
Recombinant Rod Domain of Vimentin Reduces SARS-CoV-2 Viral Replication by Blocking Spike Protein–ACE2 Interactions
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of the Vascular System in Degenerative Diseases: Mechanisms and Implications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Spike Protein S1 Induces Methylglyoxal-Derived Hydroimidazolone/Receptor for Advanced Glycation End Products (MG-H1/RAGE) Activation to Promote Inflammation in Human Bronchial BEAS-2B Cells
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Three-Dimensional Structural Stability and Local Electrostatic Potential at Point Mutations in Spike Protein of SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(4), 2174; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25042174
by Svetlana H. Hristova 1 and Alexandar M. Zhivkov 2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(4), 2174; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25042174
Submission received: 17 January 2024 / Revised: 30 January 2024 / Accepted: 1 February 2024 / Published: 11 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Advances in Molecular Research of Coronavirus)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The authors reconstructed the 3D structure of the S1 subunit of a selected coronavirus variant based on the published crystallographic structure of the S protein of the wild-type coronavirus and the amino acid sequence of the polypeptide chain of the mutant S proteins and then, after reconstructing the 3D structure of the mutants, calculated the isoelectric point, the electrostatic surface potential and the free folding energy of the S subunit at a certain pH of the medium.

Although there are many reports of calculations with RBD mutants, I have not found a series like this. The work is decent and the results and conclusions sound clear.

Comments on the Quality of English Language

The English language needs some work - e.g.:

- lines 40-42: this is confusing. Please make it 2 short sentences,

- line 124: "form" - should be "from",

- line132 - double "we"...

Author Response

We thank the Reviewer-1 for the good appreciation of our work and for the recommendations; they are introduced in the revised manuscript.

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

In the manuscript presented, the authors substantiate an idea that electrostatic association determines the relative infectivity and contagiousness, which can be predicted by reconstruction of their 3D structure and calculation the surface electrostatic potential, instead of applying an isoelectric point for this prediction.

The paper is rather well written and logically substantiated. On the other hand, in the Introduction the authors incorrectly describe the mechanism of ACE2 operation: “… the most investigated is the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE2) whose main function is regulation of the blood pressure by detachment of two aminoacid residues from the peptide angiotensin-2 …”. But the truth is that ACE2 cleaves a single amino acid from either the angiotensin 1 decapeptide or the angiotensin 2 octapeptide to form a nona- and heptapeptide, respectively.

Also, English text needs to be edited: "instead" should be written "instead of" throughout the text;  excessive use of semicolons in long sentences when one should use a period and formulate an idea using a series of short sentences; a lot of typos ("we we" on line 132, etc.)

Comments on the Quality of English Language

"instead" should be written "instead of" throughout the text;  excessive use of semicolons in long sentences when one should use a period and formulate an idea using a series of short sentences; a lot of typos ("we we" on line 132, etc.)

Author Response

We thank the Reviewer-2 for the good appreciation of our work and for the recommendations, especially about the function of the ACE2 (the first paragraph in Introduction). The recommended changes are made in the revised manuscript.

Back to TopTop