Next Article in Journal
The Anti-Tumorigenic Role of Cannabinoid Receptor 2 in Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer
Next Article in Special Issue
Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Role for Angiogenesis Markers in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Narrative Review
Previous Article in Journal
Acute Downregulation but Not Genetic Ablation of Murine MCU Impairs Suppressive Capacity of Regulatory CD4 T Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Tumor Microenvironment in Sporadic Vestibular Schwannoma: A Systematic, Narrative Review
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Therapeutic Lymphangiogenesis Is a Promising Strategy for Secondary Lymphedema

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(9), 7774; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24097774
by Yuuki Shimizu *, Yiyang Che and Toyoaki Murohara
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(9), 7774; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24097774
Submission received: 24 March 2023 / Revised: 15 April 2023 / Accepted: 23 April 2023 / Published: 24 April 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Analysis is well conducted and many data are present in this review. Nevertheless, I have some suggestion:

1.   The manuscript needs a thorough revision in order to correct English language mistakes. I had started to write down some mistakes I noticed, but there were so many, that I have not listed all. For example,

1)       The terms “In contrast” is not very suitable in Line 55 and Line 108.

2)       Line 105: There is an absence of period after the “[18]”.

3)       And please rephrase the sentence Line 105-108 “Infections caused for secondary lymphedema include filariasis, cellulitis/erysipelas, tuberculous lymphadenitis, and lymphogranuloma venereum, which filariasis is the most common cause of secondary lymphedema worldwide.”

2.   Line 85-101, Line 123-130, Line 151-163, and Line 282-295: It seems that “primary lymphedema” is not strict necessary for the proof of the main thesis.

3.   Instead, it would be beneficial if “The mechanism of lymphangiogenesis” was described in a single section before “4. Therapeutic lymphangiogenesis (Line 397)”. And more details about lymphatics hierarchical networks needs to provide (Line 48-72)

4.   Line 511-512: Maybe, we’d better added citation number for each clinical trials in Table 1

5.   The citations that within the last three years was merely 15.5% (23/148).

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

line 122

In epidemiology part:

Only mentioned Statistics of America and United Kingdom to secondary lymphedema

Authors need to add the Statistics of Asia countries studies  

 

line 178

Treatment :

Explain the limitation of each treatment

 

Line 276

Animal lymphedema model:

Authors need to detail explain of the animal experimental method and results of (Figure 1)

 

Lin2 418

Cell therapy

Please add the therapeutic potential of cord blood derived stem cell or cord blood derived lymphatic endothelial progenitor cells.

 

Line 397

Therapeutic lymphangiogenesis.

Authors mentioned two categories for Therapeutic lymphangiogenesis. However only one category was described in figure 2. Correct the figure2 to explain two categories of Therapeutic lymphangiogenesis

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop