Review Reports

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

1.     Line 35. What is Gloeomargarita []?

2.     In the introduction, the novelty of this draft should be emphasized.

3.     Attention should be paid to the layout of draft, such as line 221 and 252-255.

Author Response

Answer to Reviewer 1.

Dear Reviewer 1!

Thank you for your trouble in reading the manuscript and for the comments you made to improve it. We have tried to take them into account and make appropriate changes in the draft.

Here are our responses:

1. Line 35. What is Gloeomargarita [ ]?

Superfluous unnecessary parenthesis deleted.

`In the Introduction, the novelty of this draft should be emphasized.

In the Introduction we have now outlined the goals of our review as follows:

“The purpose of this review was to summarize and consider all known cases of phycobiliprotein antennae in relation to the evolutionary origin of different groups of oxygenic photosynthetics. We also outline possible reasons why phycobiliproteins are absent in terrestrial plants and many groups of algae.”

3. Attention should be paid to the layout of draft, such as line 221 and 252-255.

The subtitle on line 221 is rewritten as: Chlorophyll f containing cyanobacteria and their involvement in the process of photoacclimation to far red light

The original phrase on lines 252-255 was:

To summarize somewhat, we can state that changes in the composition of phycobilproteins occur differently in cyanobacteria possessing Chls b, d, or f biosynthesis. There is complete loss of PBSs and phycobiliproteins, a reduction from whole PBS to phycobiliprotein cylinders, or only a partial rearrangement of the PBS core and replacement of individual phycobiliproteins in the lateral cylinders.

It is rewritten as:

To summarize somewhat, it is stated that changes in the composition of phycobiliproteins occur differently in cyanobacteria possessing various kinds of Chl pigments. There is complete loss of PBSs and phycobiliproteins in Chl b-containg phototrophs, a reduction from whole PBS to phycobiliprotein cylinders in Chl d-containing species and only a partial rearrangement of the PBS core and replacement of individual phycobiliproteins in Chl f-containing cyanobacterial cells.

Besides, we have improved the text for English language according to comments of Ref’s 2 and 3.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript is scientifically sound. It has potentially high interest to readers interested in the area of antimicrobial resistance. I would suggest that the authors consider the following point as they revise their manuscript.

1. English changes required.

Rest is good,

Author Response

Answer to Reviewer 2

Dear Reviewer 2!

Thank you for your trouble in reading the manuscript and for positive evaluation of our work.

We have improved the text for English language according to your comment and analogous recommendations of Ref. 3.

Reviewer 3 Report

In this manuscript the authors conducted a major literature review to consider the features of PBS-68 antenna in the listed groups of photosynthetics. I consider that it is a very good document, it is very well written and presented, it presents valuable information and it has a common thread that allows us to understand the content of the document very well. It is a very valuable manuscript with great contributions to knowledge. I made small contributions directly on the pdf that can help improve the content, I mainly suggest including several references and more updated ones, also including a chapter of conclusions. The manuscript is very good and can be published.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Answers to Reviewer 3

Dear Reviewer 3!

Thank you for your trouble in reading the manuscript and for positive evaluation of our work. We have tried to take into account your comments to improve the text and have made  appropriate changes in the draft.

Line 35. Reference or delete.

Extra parenthesis is deleted.

Figure 1. the background in light blue.

The ground is made lighter.

Line 61. references

References are added.

Line 62. Match this paragraph with the previous one.

The paragraph is matched.

Line 65. references

Reference is added.

Line 69. The problem or gap in knowledge that this review aims to solve should be clearer

We have added two clarifying the problem phrases:

The purpose of this review was to summarize and consider all known cases of phycobiliprotein antennae in relation to the evolutionary origin of different groups of oxygenic photosynthetics. We also outline possible reasons why phycobiliproteins are absent in terrestrial plants and many groups of algae.

Line 72. Phycobiliproteins

The typo was corrected.

Line 77. references

Reference is added.

Line 214. Join with the previous paragraph

The paragraph is joined with the previous one.

Line 221. The text should be larger

Text of the subtitle is enlarged to:

Chlorophyll f containing cyanobacteria and their involvement in the process of photoacclimation to far red light

Line 228. ???

Erroneous word removed

Line 252. Write in third person

Written in third person

Line 616. references

Reference is added.

Line 620. Include a brief explanation

Brief explanation is included:

The slime polysaccharides, pectins, and the thin cell envelope which constitute protection of cyanobacteria contain a much lower proportion of carbon than cellulose as the basis of the eukaryotic cells wall.

Line 625. subscript

Subscription was done.

Line 628. Include references in this paragraph

Reference was added.

Line 639.  I think it is important to include at least one paragraph with the main conclusions and perhaps the perspectives

Conclusion was added

Besides, we have improved the text for English language according to your comments.