Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of Proteasome and Immunoproteasome Levels in Plasma and Peritoneal Fluid in Patients with Endometriosis
Next Article in Special Issue
An Investigation of the JAZ Family and the CwMYC2-like Protein to Reveal Their Regulation Roles in the MeJA-Induced Biosynthesis of β-Elemene in Curcuma wenyujin
Previous Article in Journal
Oral Infection, Oral Pathology and Salivary Diagnostics of Mpox Disease: Relevance in Dentistry and OMICs Perspectives
Previous Article in Special Issue
Physiological, Proteomic, and Resin Yield-Related Genes Expression Analysis Provides Insights into the Mechanisms Regulating Resin Yield in Masson Pine
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Defense Strategies of Rice in Response to the Attack of the Herbivorous Insect, Chilo suppressalis

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(18), 14361; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241814361
by Xing Xiang, Shuhua Liu, Hongjian Li, Andrews Danso Ofori, Xiaoqun Yi and Aiping Zheng *
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(18), 14361; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241814361
Submission received: 8 August 2023 / Revised: 7 September 2023 / Accepted: 12 September 2023 / Published: 21 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Molecular Plant Sciences)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The review comprehensively describes all the information known to date on the molecular genetic response to SSB contamination.  The review is well structured, written in clear language.

Disadvantages:

1. The word "end" should be deleted from the list of authors

2. Speaking about non-native rice genes and strategies to counteract SBB (pages 13-14), the authors, unfortunately, do not talk about the possible impact of products of these genes on the human body and their safety.

Author Response

 

Please see the attachment

 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments, 

 

1)    What do you mean by boring characteristics here? Can you use such phrases in scientific literature. 

2)    Line 16. Why J is capital here?

3)    How about crispr cas9 related studies? Include them.

4)    How about other omics studies? small RNA sequencing or metabolomics related studies. Include them. 

5)    How about epigenetic mechanisms? Include such studies.

6)    Enhancing comprehension and integrating more detailed information into the discussion are necessary.

7)    Major editing of English language is needed. 

  Major editing of English language is needed. 

Author Response

 

Please see the attachment

 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop