Next Article in Journal
Biocompatible Conductive Hydrogels: Applications in the Field of Biomedicine
Next Article in Special Issue
Hemolytic Activity, Cytotoxicity, and Antimicrobial Effects of Silver Nanoparticles Conjugated with Lincomycin or Cefazolin
Previous Article in Journal
The Endolysosomal System: The Acid Test for SARS-CoV-2
Previous Article in Special Issue
Activity of Silver Nanoparticles against Staphylococcus spp.
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Phage Therapy in the Era of Multidrug Resistance in Bacteria: A Systematic Review

by
Carlos Aranaga
1,*,
Lady Daniela Pantoja
1,
Edgar Andrés Martínez
1 and
Aura Falco
2
1
Chemistry and Biotechnology Research Group (QUIBIO), School of Basic Sciences, Universidad Santiago de Cali, Pampalinda Campus Calle 5 # 62-00, Santiago de Cali 76001, Colombia
2
Microbiology, Industry and Environment Research Group (GIMIA), School of Basic Sciences, Universidad Santiago de Cali, Pampalinda Campus Calle 5 # 62-00, Santiago de Cali 76001, Colombia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(9), 4577; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23094577
Submission received: 14 March 2022 / Revised: 3 April 2022 / Accepted: 6 April 2022 / Published: 21 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecules and Nanoparticles to Fight Resistant Pathogens 2.0)

Abstract

:
Bacteriophages offer an alternative for the treatment of multidrug-resistant bacterial diseases as their mechanism of action differs from that of antibiotics. However, their application in the clinical field is limited to specific cases of patients with few or no other alternative therapies. This systematic review assesses the effectiveness and safety of phage therapy against multidrug-resistant bacteria through the evaluation of studies published over the past decade. To that end, a bibliographic search was carried out in the PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar databases. Of the 1500 studies found, 27 met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 165 treated patients. Treatment effectiveness, defined as the reduction in or elimination of the bacterial load, was 85%. Except for two patients who died from causes unrelated to phage therapy, no serious adverse events were reported. This shows that phage therapy could be an alternative treatment for patients with infections associated with multidrug-resistant bacteria. However, owing to the phage specificity required for the treatment of various bacterial strains, this therapy must be personalized in terms of bacteriophage type, route of administration, and dosage.

1. Introduction

Bacteriophages were discovered by Frederick Twort and Félix d’Hérelle in 1915 and 1917, respectively. Since then, it has been suggested that the administration of these viruses could be used to treat bacterial infections. Initial results with phage therapy (PT) were promising; however, its application was limited owing to the discovery of penicillin in 1928 as well as the large-scale production of antibiotics in 1940 [1,2,3,4]. In recent years, the use of PT has recommenced owing to the increased bacterial resistance to antibiotics, which can arise because of mutations or be acquired by the acquisition of resistance-conferring genes via horizontal gene transfer (HGT). HGT may occur via conjugation, transformation, and transduction processes as well as via mobile genetic elements, such as transposons, and insertion sequences [5,6].
Infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria have become one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide, with approximately 700,000 deaths each year [7,8]. The World Health Organization (WHO) has listed critical priority pathogens that require new antibiotics or therapeutic alternatives; these pathogens include multidrug-resistant bacteria that are especially dangerous in hospitals and nursing homes and for patients who need to be treated with ventilators and intravenous catheters [9]. According to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), in Europe, North America, and Australia alone, 2.4 million people could die between now and 2050 if current bacterial resistance rates continue [10], which evidences that bacterial resistance poses a global public health problem [2,3,4,5,6,11]. Likewise, the discovery and development of new antibiotics have decreased because of the large amount of time and money required, resulting in increasingly difficult clinical management of infections and, in some cases, infections that are impossible to treat [9,11,12]. For these reasons, there is a need to look for alternatives for patients for whom conventional antibiotic therapy is ineffective. Thus, PT has become an alternative as its mechanism of action differs from that of antibiotics [13].
Lytic bacteriophages have had an impact on the clinical treatment of multidrug-resistant bacteria because of their capacity to naturally control bacterial populations [14,15]. These viruses provide novel advantages, such as the safe treatment of infections, as they are harmless to eukaryotic cells, do not cause harmful side effects, and demonstrate high host specificity. This is because they only replicate in the presence of bacteria causing the infection, thus reducing damage to the natural microflora. In addition, genetic exchange between phages rarely happens [16,17,18]. Therefore, as the frequency of therapy increases, the treatment doses and periods needed to achieve an optimal effect are expected to decrease [16,17]. Phage therapy has been used for the treatment of infections related to burn injuries or soft tissue and skin trauma, osteomyelitis, sepsis, bacteremia, and otitis media as well as urinary tract, pulmonary, and prosthetic device-associated infections. It is often used after the generally prolonged stay of the patients, who have been treated with different antibiotics without being able to eradicate the infection successfully [19,20]. However, effectiveness- and safety-related data for this type of therapy are scattered across individual clinical case reports owing to the few clinical studies conducted. In this review, we summarize the effectiveness- and safety-related data from studies conducted on human patients infected with various types of bacteria who underwent PT as an adjuvant or alternative therapy to antibiotics.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Search Strategy

To carry out the bibliographic search, three databases were selected: ScienceDirect, PubMed, and Google Scholar. The keywords used were phage therapy and multidrug resistant. The search was defined with the use of Boolean operators as follows: “phage therapy” AND “multidrug resistant”. The search was adjusted in each database according to the descriptors and using “phage therapy in the era of multidrug resistance in bacteria” as a reference. The search protocol was conducted by two independent reviewers.

2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

The review included full-text articles and clinical case reports published in Spanish and English over the last ten years, that is, from 1 January 2011 to 25 April 2021. The main objectives of these studies were to describe the use of PT in patients infected with various bacteria, provided that, at the end of the study, it would be possible to tell whether there was a positive or negative response to the treatment.
The review also excluded bibliographic material that had not been reviewed by academic peers; articles written in a language other than Spanish or English; articles published outside the selected duration; bibliographic material, such as reviews, systematic reviews, posters, conferences, book sections, and perspectives; multidrug-resistance-based studies that did not use phage therapy; studies on metagenomics in bacteriophages without subsequent application in human patients; studies on PT in animals; and studies on the use of phages in foods.
The selection of articles was carried out considering the PRISMA statement (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) (Figure 1).

2.3. Data Extraction

The citations selected, along with their title, were imported into EndNote, a Bibliographic Reference Management Software, and Microsoft Office Excel, which was used to check duplicated results between the three databases. Duplicated records were eliminated.

2.4. Data Analysis

Evaluation of the records was carried out by reading the titles and the abstracts. All those that did not meet the inclusion criteria were discarded. Then, the full texts were analyzed to rule out those articles that did not meet the inclusion criteria, thus leaving us with the final records that were included in this review. Subsequently, the information of each article was collected in two Excel tables, whereas the most relevant information was captured in graphs for later analysis.

3. Results

The bibliographic search yielded a total of 1500 articles distributed as follows: 203 in PubMed, 306 in ScienceDirect, and 991 in Google Scholar published between 2011 and 2021. After excluding duplicated records (336 articles) and 1121 articles that did not meet the inclusion criteria, 27 articles were included in this review (Figure 1). Subsequently, information concerning the effectiveness and safety of PT was collected along with other findings that the authors considered relevant [21].
Of a total of 165 patients who underwent phage therapy, 141 (85%) showed a reduction in or complete elimination of the bacterial load accompanied by an improvement in the signs and symptoms, whereas PT was ineffective in the remaining 24 (15%). Only 21% (n = 35) of patients received PT combined with antibiotics, with a 100% success rate. The remaining 79% (n = 130) were treated exclusively with PT, with a success rate of 81%. Bacterial resistance to phages was reported in 6 of the 27 articles reviewed [22,23,24,25,26,27]; in four studies, the initial therapy was modified by changing or including new bacteriophages [22,23,24,25,26,27], whereas in the remaining studies, resistance was measured at the end of the study.
The age of the patients receiving PT ranged from 2 to 88 years, with an average of 54 years. Three of these studies were conducted on minors (12%) [19,28,29], whereas 88% included patients over the age of 18. Most cases yielded positive results in terms of effectiveness (improving the medical condition), and adverse side effects were minimal. In addition, phage administration was not associated with the death of any of the patients (Table 1).
A total of 61 multidrug-resistant bacterial species were reported, including Staphylococcus aureus (24.5%, n = 15/61), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (22.9%, n = 14/61), Klebsiella pneumoniae (13.1%, n = 8/61), and Acinetobacter baumannii (8.1%, n = 5/61) (Figure 2).
In most clinical cases, phage cocktails were administered (84%, n = 21), i.e., a combination of 2 to 12 bacteriophages, whereas in seven cases, a single phage (16%) was administered [23,26,30,31,32]. The routes of administration of the phage cocktails in these 27 cases were as follows: 4 topical (16%) [23,33,34,35], 7 intravenous (28%) [19,25,30,33,34,35,36], 4 in organs or cavities (16%) [22,24,32,37,38], 5 through inhalation (16%) [26,27,29,39], and 6 using more than one route of administration (24%) [28,31,40,41,42,43] (Table 2).
Table 1. Data collection, after reading the full texts of the selected articles.
Table 1. Data collection, after reading the full texts of the selected articles.
Author(s)/
Reference
CountryYear of PublicationMultidrug-Resistant BacteriaSite or Type of InfectionPatients (Number/Gender/
Age)
Comorbidities/ Medical HistoryAdverse EffectsEffect of the Treatment
Ooi, M.L. et al.
[37]
Australia2019Staphylococcus aureusRecalcitrant chronic rhinosinusitis caused by a biofilm9/4 men, 5 women/
18–70 years of age
Endoscopic sinus surgeryDiarrhea, epistaxis, oropharyngeal pain, cough, rhinalgia, and low blood bicarbonate levelPositive treatment effect: 2 patients were cured and the others showed reduced bacterial growth
Schooley, R.T. et al.
[25]
U.S.2017Acinetobacter baumanniiPancreatic pseudocyst infection1/male/68 years of ageDiabetic, necrotizing pancreatitisNot reportedPositive treatment effect: patient showed continuous clinical improvement, woke up from coma, showed renal improvement, and was extubated
Jault, P. et al.
[23]
France–Belgium2018Pseudomonas aeruginosa- Escherichia coliInfection of wounds from burns on the skin12/men and women/
over 18 years of age
Hospitalized patients, treated for burns in a burn unitNo adverse effects related to PT were observedNo/insufficient treatment effect owing to the administration of a very low treatment dose
Law, N. et al.
[34]
U.S.2019Pseudomonas aeruginosaRespiratory tract infection1/woman/26 years of agePatient with cystic fibrosis, persistent respiratory failure, and renal failureNo adverse effects related to PT were observedPositive treatment effect: pneumonia clinically resolved, baseline renal function was restored, and fever disappeared
Aslam, S. et al.
[19]
U.S.2019Pseudomonas aeruginosa-Burkholderia dolosa-Mycobacterium abscessusLower respiratory tract infections3/1 man, 2 women/
67, 28, and 57 years of age
Lung transplantation and progressive kidney failureIntravenous and nebulized formulations of bacteriophages were well tolerated without adverse effects attributed to bacteriophage administrationA positive effect of the treatment was observed in two of the three patients (one male and female, each aged 67 years) as they did not develop further infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and their respiratory status markedly improved. The 28-year-old patient died. However, this was not attributed to PT, but rather to a sequence of events that led to multi-organ failure, most plausibly attributable to postsplenectomy complications and liver disease. Hence, a verdict on the treatment was not possible.
Nir-Paz, R. et al.
[35]
U.S.2019Acinetobacter baumannii-Klebsiella pneumoniaeLeft tibial infection following trauma1/male/42 years of ageGrade IIIA bilateral open fractures of the lower extremities: left bicondylar tibial plateau fracture with compartment syndrome and right distal femoral fractureNo adverse effects associated with PT were observedPositive treatment effect, with healing of the graft and elimination of subtle chronic bone pain in the left leg. During a follow-up period of 8 months after treatment, no Ab- or Kp-positive cultures were obtained from any site.
Tkhilaisshvili, T. et al.
[33]
Germany2019Pseudomonas aeruginosa- Staphylococcus epidermidisChronic recurrent periprosthetic infection of the knee and chronic osteomyelitis of the femur1/woman/
80 years of age
Metabolic syndrome (type II diabetes mellitus and obesity) and chronic renal failureNo adverse effects related to PT were observedPositive treatment effect. The patient did not report pain in the right knee; the soft tissue at the surgical site did not show complications; and mobility was satisfactory. All periprosthetic tissue samples collected intraoperatively resulted in negative cultures.
Corbellino, M. et al.
[28]
Italy2019Klebsiella pneumoniaeInfections of the gastrointestinal and urinary tracts1/male/57 years of ageCrohn’s disease, obstructive nephrolithiasis, right nephrectomy and radical cystectomy, and stage III chronic renal failureNo adverse effects related to PT were observedPositive treatment effect. Long-lasting multi-site colonization by an MDR Kp strain in a patient with a single kidney, a cutaneous ureterostomy, and an indwelling ureteral stent resolved after a 3-week course of PT.
Duplessis, C. et al.
[36]
U.S.2017Pseudomonas aeruginosaRecalcitrant infection after ASD/VSD closures1/male (child)/2 years of ageDiGeorge syndrome and complex congenital heart disease, including a type B interrupted aortic arch, posterior misalignment of a ventricular septal defect (VSD), sub-aortic stenosis, bicuspid aortic valve, and secundum atrial septal defectDecompensation owing to anaphylaxis, which was subsequently attributed to progressive heart failure, although the release of endotoxins as a contributing factor could not be ruled outClinical improvement was seen after treatment for several days with PT; however, the patient decompensated and developed severe arrhythmias and cardiac and septic shocks. This turbulent worsening was attributed to the progressive accumulation of undrained fluids, a history of influenza infection, and end-stage heart failure. Finally, the child passed away.
Qin, J. et al.
[24]
China2021Klebsiella pneumoniaeMultifocal urinary tract infections1/male/66 years of ageThe patient’s cancerous bladder was partially resectedNo adverse effects related to PT were observedNegative treatment effect. The phage cocktail did not work. It is believed that the heterogeneous bacteria that colonized the renal pelvis could not be effectively eliminated because the phages could not reach them.
Tan, X. et al.
[26]
China2021Acinetobacter baumanniiLung infection1/male/86 years of ageExacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and type II diabetesNo adverse effects related to PT were observedPositive treatment effect, with elimination of the pathogen and clinical improvement of the patient’s lung function
Hoyle, N. et al.
[29]
Georgia2018Achromobacter xylosoxidansChronic lung infection1/female/
17 years of age
Cystic fibrosisNo adverse effects related to PT were observedPositive treatment effect; dyspnea resolved and cough was reduced. Lung function: FEV1 increased.
Leitner, L. et al.
[38]
Georgia2018Enterococcus spp. Escherichia coli, Streptococcus spp.Urinary tract infection28/men/
over 18 years of age
Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), with complicated or recurrent uncomplicated UTI without signs of systemic infectionNo adverse effects related to PT were observedPositive effect of treatment in 60% of patients, with normalization of urine cultures
Cano, E.J. et al.
[30]
U.S.2020Klebsiella pneumoniaeKnee joint prosthesis infection1/male/62 years of ageDiabetes mellitus, obesity, total knee arthroplasty, multiple bacterial infectionsNo adverse effects related to PT were observedPositive treatment effect. The patient showed improvement and remained asymptomatic 34 weeks after completing the treatment, in addition to showing improvement of erythema, swelling, pain, range of motion, and function of his right lower extremity.
Gupta, P. et al.
[44]
Varanasi, India2019Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosaInfection of chronic wounds (ulcers) that do not heal20/12–60 years of ageNot reportedNo adverse effects related to PT were observedPositive treatment effect in 7 patients who completely healed; the others showed significant improvement in terms of wound healing
Lebeaux, D. et al.
[45]
Paris, France2021Achromobacter xylosoxidansPersistent lung infection1/male/12 years of ageCystic fibrosis and double lung transplantationNo adverse effects related to PT were observedPositive effect. Respiratory condition gradually improved, and the bacterial load decreased.
Nadareishvili, L. et al.
[40]
Georgia2020Staphylococcus aureusOsteomyelitis of the sternum and parasternal abscess1/male/74 years of ageCoronary artery graft, type II diabetes mellitus, high blood pressureNot reportedPositive treatment effect. The diameter of the wound decreased and the purulent fistula closed.
Staphylococcus aureusChronic osteomyelitis of the right tibia1/female/
60 years of age
Type II diabetes mellitusNot reportedPositive treatment effect with complete wound closure
Burkholderia cepacia, S. aureus, and Enterococcus faecalisOsteomyelitis with foot ulcer1/male/69 years of ageType II diabetes mellitusNot reportedPositive treatment effect. The patient improved and the ulcer healed.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa, then by Staphylococcus aureus and Serratia MarcescensLaryngeal (post-surgical) infection1/male/68 years of ageRemoval of the larynx due to carcinomaNot reportedPositive treatment effect. The patient improved and infection was completely cured.
Patel, D.R. et al.
[46]
India2019Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus species, Citrobacter freundii, Morganella morganii, Acinetobacter baumanniiChronic wound infection of the skin48/34 men, 14 women/12–70 years of age27 diabetics, 8 with high blood pressure, 2 with tuberculosis, and 10 with amputationsNot reportedPositive treatment effect in 39 patients who were completely cured; 2 patients died
Fadlallah, A. et al.
[31]
Georgia2015Staphylococcus aureusEye infection/bacterial keratitis1/female/65 years of agePostoperative corneal abscess of the left eye and interstitial keratitis after craniotomy for acoustic neurinomaNo adverse effects related to PT were observedPositive treatment effects, with stabilization of ocular signs and negative eye and nasal cultures
Jennes, S. et al.
[41]
Belgium2017Pseudomonas aeruginosaAcute kidney infection after injury1/male/61 years of agePeritonitis owing to Enterobacter cloacae and severe abdominal sepsis with disseminated intravascular coagulation secondary to strangulated diaphragmatic hernia. The patient had a prolonged hospital stay complicated by peripheral gangrene of his extremities, which resulted in the amputation of the lower limbs and the development of large necrotic pressure ulcers.No adverse effects related to PT were observedPositive treatment effects; blood cultures were negative, CRP levels decreased, and fever disappeared. Kidney function recovered within a few days. However, the patient died after 4 months from a sudden refractory cardiac arrest in the hospital due to Klebsiella pneumoniae.
Kuipers, S. et al.
[42]
Holland2020Klebsiella pneumoniaeRecurrent urinary tract infection1/male/58 years of ageKidney transplantNo adverse effects related to PT were observedPositive treatment effects. The symptoms of urethritis quickly disappeared.
Onsea, S. et al.
[43]
Belgium2019P. aeruginosa and S. epidermidisChronic osteomyelitis of the pelvisPatient 1Isolated fibrous tumor in the left pelvic regionNot reportedPositive treatment effects. C-reactive protein and white blood cell levels returned to normal.
P. aeruginosa and S. epidermidisNon-union of distal femurPatient 2Polytrauma after aggression, with open segmental fractures of the right femurNot reportedPositive treatment effects. The levels of C-reactive protein and white blood cells returned to normal. Infection-free.
S. agalactiae and S. aureusPostoperative problems of the femur woundPatient 3Polytrauma after the collapse of a building, with crush injuries of the upper right leg and complex fractures of the femurNot reportedPositive treatment effects. C-reactive protein and white blood cell levels returned to normal.
E. faecalisInfection of the surgical site with abscess formation and evolution to osteomyelitis of the femurPatient 4Polytrauma after traffic accident, with fracture of the femurLocal redness and painPositive treatment effects. C-reactive protein and white blood cell levels returned to normal.
Wu, N. et al.
[27]
Shanghai, China2021Acinetobacter baumanniiRespiratory tract infection acquired in the hospital1/male/62 years of ageCritical condition due to COVID-19 (RNA-negative) and co-infection with Candida albicans and Ralstonia mannitolilyticaCytokine storm and fever 4 h after 1Ф phage administration Positive treatment effects. Clinical improvement, discharged from the hospital on day 30.
Respiratory tract and intubation wound infections acquired in the hospital1/male/64 years of ageCritical condition due to COVID-19 (RNA-negative)No adverse effects related to PT were observedPositive treatment effects. Clinical improvement and discharge from the hospital on day 9.
Respiratory tract infection acquired in the hospital1/male/81 years of ageCritical condition due to COVID-19 (RNA-negative) and co-infection with Candida albicans and Candida glabrataNo adverse effects related to PT were observedPositive treatment effects. The infection was eliminated; however, patient died on day 10 owing to respiratory failure caused by infection with Klebsiella pneumoniae.
Respiratory tract and bladder infections acquired in the hospital1/male/78 years of ageCritical status due to COVID-19 (RNA-negative) and co-infection with Candida albicans, Klebsiella pneumoniae resistant to carbapenems, and Sphingomonas paucimobilisNo adverse effects related to PT were observedPositive treatment effect with improvement, patient was discharged from the ICU on day 7; however, he died on day 40 owing to respiratory failure
Bao, J. et al.
[22]
Shanghai, China2020Klebsiella pneumoniaeRecurrent urinary tract infection1/female/63 years of ageType II diabetes and hypertensionNo adverse effects related to PT were observedPositive treatment effect. The infection was completely eradicated.
Rose, T. et al.
[39]
Brussels, Belgium2014Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureusBurn infection9/4 men, 5 women/
27–88 years of age
Not reportedNo adverse effects related to PT were observedNegative treatment effect. Low bacterial load, almost unchanged.
Rubalskii, E. et al.
[32]
Germany2020Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecium, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Escherichia coliPatients had infections associated with immunosuppression after organ transplantation or had infections of vascular grafts, implanted medical devices, and surgical wounds8/7 men, 1 womanNot reportedNo adverse effects related to PT were observedPositive effect of treatment in 7 patients who are completely cured; the other showed a significant improvement in terms of decreased bacterial load

4. Discussion

This systematic review displays effectiveness- and safety-related data as well as some relevant findings that have been reported in PT studies in humans from studies published in English over the last ten years. Based on the findings from a total of 165 patients treated in 27 selected studies, it can be concluded that PT produced encouraging results for the treatment of infections caused by various bacterial species, especially those that are difficult to manage, such as infections caused by bacteria resistant to multiple antibiotics [22,25,28,34,41]. In 85% of the cases, the therapy was successful through the administration of either a single phage or a phage cocktail. One of the primary factors responsible for this success is the use of specific bacteriophages for each bacterial strain. Although 100% of the studies reported having conducted in vitro studies of bacteriophage activity at the beginning of the therapy, in 15% of the cases, the infection had not been resolved at the end of the therapy. Some authors attributed these failures to defective modes of administration [38], a low phage concentration [23], or co-infection with other species of bacterial strains [46], rather than to a low effectiveness of the therapy.
One of the main concerns with PT is the development of phage-resistant strains [19,25]. An in vitro study by Oechslin et al. found that the frequency of spontaneous phage resistance mutations in a susceptible strain of P. aeruginosa was around 10–7. Additionally, the same authors concluded that, although some mutations confer resistance to phages, these mutations can decrease bacterial fitness when compared to normal growth under less strict in vitro conditions in animals [47]. This could explain the success of PT in some patients despite the presence of phage-resistant bacteria [23,26], which would prove that a patient’s immune system plays an important role in the success of PT in the short, medium, and long terms.
Although PT is presented as an emerging strategy to fight multidrug-resistant bacterial infections, evidence suggests that coadministration of phages and antibiotics could be a more effective strategy for the elimination of infection [19]. In cases where combined therapy was administered, patients recovered from the infection with 100% success, whereas 88% of those patients who received PT alone recovered. This result can be explained as follows: combination therapy may decrease the selection of phage-resistant bacteria [47], in addition to increasing the sensitivity to antibiotics [25,47,48]. Additionally, antibiotics could act as adjuvants that minimize the appearance of other pathogens in immunocompromised patients.
Owing to serious public health threats posed by health care-associated infections (HAIs), such as those caused by E. coli, S. aureus, K. pneumoniae, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, and Enterococcus faecalis [49], and given the call made by the WHO for a search for new alternatives in the treatment of multidrug-resistant bacteria, especially those belonging to the ESKAPE group [7], it is not surprising that infections caused by these pathogenic bacteria were more frequently treated with PT (50.8%). A single phage or a cocktail of phages proved effective in the treatment of these infections regardless of their sensitivity or resistance to antibiotics. However, phage cocktails were more widely used (84%) to increase bacterial sensitivity to therapy.
In all studies, the administration of PT was considered safe for patients. The age of the treated patients ranged between 2 and 88 years, with an average of 55 years. Duplessis et al. (2017) reported the case of a 2-year-old patient with DiGeorge syndrome and a series of comorbidities that were difficult to manage, in addition to recalcitrant bacteremia/sepsis owing to multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa. Phage therapy was initiated in this patient to treat the infection. Although sterile blood cultures were obtained for P. aeruginosa in the short term, the treatment had to be interrupted owing to decompensation of the infant caused by anaphylaxis. A refractory infection led to the reinitiation of PT, which once again proved effective, resulting in sterile blood cultures 24 h after therapy onset. Unfortunately, the patient’s decompensation and worsening prognosis owing to severe arrhythmias as well as cardiogenic and septic shocks (caused by the same bacteria), possibly owing to a history of influenza infection and end-stage heart failure, among others (although none of these effects were related to the administration of PT), led relatives to withdraw care, and the child died soon afterwards [36].
Jault et al. (2019) reported the death of an adult man over 70 years of age who was recruited to participate in the controlled clinical trial PhagoBurn, once the inclusion and exclusion criteria were met. The patient received PT topically for the treatment of P. aeruginosa, and his death occurred sometime after completing the treatment regimen, although no association with PT was found [23].
The potential development of adverse events associated with the concentration of endotoxin residues, i.e., the amount of bacterial endotoxin lipopolysaccharide released during phage-mediated lysis [19], has apparently been discarded based on reports that the maximum dose is below 5 units of endotoxin per kg of body weight per hour (required by international regulators), and this is reflected by the absence of serious adverse events during the administration of PT in all the studies. This confirms the safety of PT for the treatment of bacterial infections.
Additionally, bacteriophages offer new advantages, namely, their high specificity toward the host cell, which would reduce the damage to the normal microbiome of the patient and decrease colonization by other pathogens in the absence of in vivo drug interactions, bactericidal activity, minimal variability in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, agnostic bacterial targeting irrespective of the antibacterial susceptibility profile, minimal environmental footprints, and potential inducement of susceptible bacterial profiles [36]. Moreover, their ability to alter the formation of biofilms enhances the action of antibiotics in combination therapies [21]. In addition, free genetic exchange of phages rarely occurs [3,17,18]. Thus, as the frequency of therapy increases, the treatment doses and periods needed to achieve an optimal effect would be expected to decrease [17,18]. However, one of the main challenges that must be faced for the definitive implementation of phage therapy is the unification of criteria and standardized procedures that allow dealing with infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria. This is because the few studies that have been reported present a great variability of results because they not only depend on the multidrug-resistant bacteria, but also on the type and place of the infection that they are causing. This in turn affects the dosage and application of combination therapies, which makes comparison between studies difficult. All this highlights the need to generate guidelines with unified criteria to determine the validity of phage therapy.

5. Conclusions

Phage therapy has proven to be effective and safe for the treatment of infectious diseases caused by various bacterial species, including multidrug-resistant strains. This effectiveness has been demonstrated both through local and systemic administration, with no associated serious adverse events. However, much of the success of PT depends on the selection of specific bacteriophages for each bacterial species and strain, owing to their specificity toward the host cell, which is why extensive libraries of phages are required to personalize treatments. On the other hand, coadministration of antibiotics as adjuvants is recommended as it prevents infections by non-specific bacteria and helps eliminate bacteria already sensitized by the phages.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.A. and A.F.; methodology, C.A., L.D.P. and E.A.M.; software, L.D.P. and E.A.M.; validation, C.A.; formal analysis, C.A., A.F., L.D.P. and E.A.M.; investigation, C.A., A.F., L.D.P. and E.A.M.; resources, C.A.; data curation, C.A.; writing—original draft preparation, C.A., L.D.P. and E.A.M.; writing—review and editing, C.A. and A.F.; visualization, C.A. and A.F.; supervision, C.A. and A.F.; project administration, C.A.; funding acquisition, C.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research has been funded by Dirección General de Investigaciones of the Universidad Santiago de Cali, grants numbers: 2847-20220212 and 3047-20220212, and under call No. 01-2022.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article and are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pires, D.P.; Cleto, S.; Sillankorva, S.; Azeredo, J.; Lu, T.K. Genetically Engineered Phages: A Review of Advances over the Last Decade. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2016, 80, 523–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Payaslian, F.; Gradaschi, V.; Piuri, M. Genetic Manipulation of Phages for Therapy Using BRED. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2021, 68, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Henry, M.; O’Sullivan, O.; Sleator, R.D.; Coffey, A.; Ross, R.P.; McAuliffe, O.; O’Mahony, J.M. In Silico Analysis of Ardmore, a Novel Mycobacteriophage Isolated from Soil. Gene 2010, 453, 9–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kilcher, S.; Loessner, M.J. Engineering Bacteriophages as Versatile Biologics. Trends Microbiol. 2019, 27, 355–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Pérez-Martínez, D.A.; Puente-Muñoz, A.I. Bacterias, Endotoxinas Y Neuroinflamación Crónica: ¿Una Etiopatogenia Para Las Enfermedad De Alzheimer? Rev. Ecuatoriana Neurol. 2020, 29, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Vispo, N.S.; Puchades, Y. Bacteriófagos: De La Terapia Con Fagos a La Biología Combinatoria. Biotecnol. Apl. 2001, 18, 135–147. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ukuhor, H.O. The Interrelationships between Antimicrobial Resistance, COVID-19, Past, and Future Pandemics. J. Infect. Public Health 2021, 14, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. World Health Organization New Report Calls for Urgent Action to Avert Antimicrobial Resistance Crisis. Available online: https://www.who.int/news/item/29-04-2019-new-report-calls-for-urgent-action-to-avert-antimicrobial-resistance-crisis (accessed on 31 March 2022).
  9. Tacconelli, E.; Carrara, E.; Savoldi, A.; Harbarth, S.; Mendelson, M.; Monnet, D.L.; Pulcini, C.; Kahlmeter, G.; Kluytmans, J.; Carmeli, Y.; et al. Discovery, Research, and Development of New Antibiotics: The WHO Priority List of Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria and Tuberculosis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2018, 18, 318–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cecchini, M. Stemming the Superbug Tide Just a Few Dollars More; Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development: Paris, France, 2018; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  11. Suzuki, Y.; Ishimoto, T.; Fujita, S.; Kiryu, S.; Wada, M.; Akatsuka, T.; Saito, M.; Kawano, M. Antimicrobial Antisense RNA Delivery to F-Pili Producing Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria via a Genetically Engineered Bacteriophage. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2020, 530, 533–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tinoco, J.M.; Liss, N.; Zhang, H.; Nissan, R.; Gordon, W.; Tinoco, E.; Sassone, L.; Stevens, R. Antibacterial Effect of Genetically-Engineered Bacteriophage ΦEf11/ΦFL1C(Δ36)PnisA on Dentin Infected with Antibiotic-Resistant Enterococcus Faecalis. Arch. Oral Biol. 2017, 82, 166–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. García, I.; Porras, M. Aislamiento de Bacteriófagos de Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Multidrogo–Resistente En Aguas de Tres Ríos de la Provincia de Lima-Perú; Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos: Lima, Peru, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  14. Sinha, A.; Eniyan, K.; Manohar, P.; Ramesh, N.; Bajpai, U. Characterization and Genome Analysis of B1 Sub-Cluster Mycobacteriophage PDRPxv. Virus Res. 2020, 279, 197884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Romero, J.; Feijoo, C.G.; Navarrete, P. Antibiotics in Aquaculture–Use, Abuse and Alternatives. Heal. Environ. Aquac. 2012, 159, 198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Cebriá-Mendoza, M.; Sanjuán, R.; Domingo-Calap, P. Directed Evolution of a Mycobacteriophage. Antibiotics 2019, 8, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Bajpai, U.; Mehta, A.K.; Eniyan, K.; Sinha, A.; Ray, A.; Virdi, S.; Ahmad, S.; Shah, A.; Arora, D.; Marwaha, D.; et al. Isolation and Characterization of Bacteriophages from India, with Lytic Activity against Mycobacterium Tuberculosis. Can. J. Microbiol. 2018, 64, 483–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Chan, B.K.; Abedon, S.T.; Loc-Carrillo, C. Phage Cocktails and the Future of Phage Therapy. Future Microbiol. 2013, 8, 769–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Aslam, S.; Courtwright, A.M.; Koval, C.; Lehman, S.M.; Morales, S.; Furr, C.L.L.; Rosas, F.; Brownstein, M.J.; Fackler, J.R.; Sisson, B.M.; et al. Early Clinical Experience of Bacteriophage Therapy in 3 Lung Transplant Recipients. Am. J. Transplant 2019, 19, 2631–2639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. De Oliveira, A.; Souza, R.; Piscoya, M.E.; Iquiapaza, R.A. Resistencia Bacteriana y Mortalidad En Un Centro de Terapia Intensiva. Rev. Latino-Am. Enferm. 2010, 18, 6–10. [Google Scholar]
  21. Harper, D.R.; Parracho, H.M.R.T.; Walker, J.; Sharp, R.; Hughes, G.; Werthén, M.; Lehman, S.; Morales, S. Bacteriophages and Biofilms. Antibiotics 2014, 3, 270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bao, J.; Wu, N.; Zeng, Y.; Chen, L.; Li, L.; Yang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, M.; Li, L.; Li, J.; et al. Non-Active Antibiotic and Bacteriophage Synergism to Successfully Treat Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection Caused by Extensively Drug-Resistant Klebsiella Pneumoniae. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2020, 9, 771–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Jault, P.; Leclerc, T.; Jennes, S.; Pirnay, J.P.; Que, Y.A.; Resch, G.; Rousseau, A.F.; Ravat, F.; Carsin, H.; Le Floch, R.; et al. Efficacy and Tolerability of a Cocktail of Bacteriophages to Treat Burn Wounds Infected by Pseudomonas Aeruginosa (PhagoBurn): A Randomised, Controlled, Double-Blind Phase 1/2 Trial. Lancet. Infect. Dis. 2019, 19, 35–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Qin, J.; Wu, N.; Bao, J.; Shi, X.; Ou, H.; Ye, S.; Zhao, W.; Wei, Z.; Cai, J.; Li, L.; et al. Heterogeneous Klebsiella Pneumoniae Co-Infections Complicate Personalized Bacteriophage Therapy. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 10, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Schooley, R.T.; Biswas, B.; Gill, J.J.; Hernandez-Morales, A.; Lancaster, J.; Lessor, L.; Barr, J.J.; Reed, S.L.; Rohwer, F.; Benler, S.; et al. Development and Use of Personalized Bacteriophage-Based Therapeutic Cocktails To Treat a Patient with a Disseminated Resistant Acinetobacter Baumannii Infection. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61, e00954-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Tan, X.; Chen, H.; Zhang, M.; Zhao, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Liu, X.; Huang, W.; Ma, Y. Clinical Experience of Personalized Phage Therapy Against Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter Baumannii Lung Infection in a Patient With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Wu, N.; Dai, J.; Guo, M.; Li, J.; Zhou, X.; Li, F.; Gao, Y.; Qu, H.; Lu, H.; Jin, J.; et al. Pre-Optimized Phage Therapy on Secondary Acinetobacter Baumannii Infection in Four Critical COVID-19 Patients. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2021, 10, 612–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Corbellino, M.; Kieffer, N.; Kutateladze, M.; Balarjishvili, N.; Leshkasheli, L.; Askilashvili, L.; Tsertsvadze, G.; Rimoldi, S.G.; Nizharadze, D.; Hoyle, N.; et al. Eradication of a Multidrug-Resistant, Carbapenemase-Producing Klebsiella Pneumoniae Isolate Following Oral and Intra-Rectal Therapy With a Custom Made, Lytic Bacteriophage Preparation. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 70, 1998–2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hoyle, N.; Zhvaniya, P.; Balarjishvili, N.; Bolkvadze, D.; Nadareishvili, L.; Nizharadze, D.; Wittmann, J.; Rohde, C.; Kutateladze, M. Phage Therapy against Achromobacter Xylosoxidans Lung Infection in a Patient with Cystic Fibrosis: A Case Report. Res. Microbiol. 2018, 169, 540–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cano, E.J.; Caflisch, K.M.; Bollyky, P.L.; Van Belleghem, J.D.; Patel, R.; Fackler, J.; Brownstein, M.J.; Horne, B.; Biswas, B.; Henry, M.; et al. Phage Therapy for Limb-Threatening Prosthetic Knee Klebsiella Pneumoniae Infection: Case Report and In Vitro Characterization of Anti-Biofilm Activity. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2021, 73, E144–E151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Fadlallah, A.; Chelala, E.; Legeais, J.-M. Corneal Infection Therapy with Topical Bacteriophage Administration. Open Ophthalmol. J. 2015, 9, 167–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Rubalskii, E.; Ruemke, S.; Salmoukas, C.; Boyle, E.C.; Warnecke, G.; Tudorache, I.; Shrestha, M.; Schmitto, J.D.; Martens, A.; Rojas, S.V.; et al. Bacteriophage Therapy for Critical Infections Related to Cardiothoracic Surgery. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tkhilaishvili, T.; Winkler, T.; Müller, M.; Perka, C.; Trampuz, A. Bacteriophages as Adjuvant to Antibiotics for the Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Caused by Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas Aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019, 64, e00924-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Law, N.; Logan, C.; Yung, G.; Furr, C.L.L.; Lehman, S.M.; Morales, S.; Rosas, F.; Gaidamaka, A.; Bilinsky, I.; Grint, P.; et al. Successful Adjunctive Use of Bacteriophage Therapy for Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Infection in a Cystic Fibrosis Patient. Infection 2019, 47, 665–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Nir-Paz, R.; Gelman, D.; Khouri, A.; Sisson, B.M.; Fackler, J.; Alkalay-Oren, S.; Khalifa, L.; Rimon, A.; Yerushalmy, O.; Bader, R.; et al. Successful Treatment of Antibiotic-Resistant, Poly-Microbial Bone Infection With Bacteriophages and Antibiotics Combination. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2019, 69, 2015–2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Duplessis, C.; Biswas, B.; Hanisch, B.; Perkins, M.; Henry, M.; Quinones, J.; Wolfe, D.; Estrella, L.; Hamilton, T. Refractory Pseudomonas Bacteremia in a 2-Year-Old Sterilized by Bacteriophage Therapy. J. Pediatric Infect. Dis. Soc. 2018, 7, 253–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Ooi, M.L.; Drilling, A.J.; Morales, S.; Fong, S.; Moraitis, S.; MacIas-Valle, L.; Vreugde, S.; Psaltis, A.J.; Wormald, P.J. Safety and Tolerability of Bacteriophage Therapy for Chronic Rhinosinusitis Due to Staphylococcus Aureus. JAMA Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2019, 145, 723–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Leitner, L.; Ujmajuridze, A.; Chanishvili, N.; Goderdzishvili, M.; Chkonia, I.; Rigvava, S.; Chkhotua, A.; Changashvili, G.; McCallin, S.; Schneider, M.P.; et al. Intravesical Bacteriophages for Treating Urinary Tract Infections in Patients Undergoing Transurethral Resection of the Prostate: A Randomised, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Trial. Lancet. Infect. Dis. 2021, 21, 427–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rose, T.; Verbeken, G.; De Vos, D.; Merabishvili, M.; Vaneechoutte, M.; Lavigne, R.; Jennes, S.; Zizi, M.; Pirnay, J.-P. Experimental Phage Therapy of Burn Wound Infection: Difficult First Steps. Int. J. Burns Trauma 2014, 4, 66. [Google Scholar]
  40. Nadareishvili, L.; Hoyle, N.; Nakaidze, N.; Nizharadze, D.; Kutateladze, M.; Balarjishvili, N.; Kutter, E.; Pruidze, N. Bacteriophage Therapy as a Potential Management Option for Surgical Wound Infections. Phage 2020, 1, 158–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jennes, S.; Merabishvili, M.; Soentjens, P.; Pang, K.W.; Rose, T.; Keersebilck, E.; Soete, O.; François, P.M.; Teodorescu, S.; Verween, G.; et al. Use of Bacteriophages in the Treatment of Colistin-Only-Sensitive Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Septicaemia in a Patient with Acute Kidney Injury-a Case Report. Crit. Care 2017, 21, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Kuipers, S.; Ruth, M.M.; Mientjes, M.; de Sévaux, R.G.L.; van Ingen, J. A Dutch Case Report of Successful Treatment of Chronic Relapsing Urinary Tract Infection with Bacteriophages in a Renal Transplant Patient. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019, 64, e01281-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Onsea, J.; Soentjens, P.; Djebara, S.; Merabishvili, M.; Depypere, M.; Spriet, I.; De Munter, P.; Debaveye, Y.; Nijs, S.; Vanderschot, P.; et al. Bacteriophage Application for Difficult-to-Treat Musculoskeletal Infections: Development of a Standardized Multidisciplinary Treatment Protocol. Viruses 2019, 11, 891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Gupta, P.; Singh, H.S.; Shukla, V.K.; Nath, G.; Bhartiya, S.K. Bacteriophage Therapy of Chronic Nonhealing Wound: Clinical Study. Int. J. Low. Extrem. Wounds 2019, 18, 171–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Lebeaux, D.; Merabishvili, M.; Caudron, E.; Lannoy, D.; Van Simaey, L.; Duyvejonck, H.; Guillemain, R.; Thumerelle, C.; Podglajen, I.; Compain, F.; et al. A Case of Phage Therapy against Pandrug-Resistant Achromobacter Xylosoxidans in a 12-Year-Old Lung-Transplanted Cystic Fibrosis Patient. Viruses 2021, 13, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Patel, D.R.; Bhartiya, S.K.; Kumar, R.; Shukla, V.K.; Nath, G. Use of Customized Bacteriophages in the Treatment of Chronic Nonhealing Wounds: A Prospective Study. Int. J. Low. Extrem. Wounds 2021, 20, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Oechslin, F.; Piccardi, P.; Mancini, S.; Gabard, J.; Moreillon, P.; Entenza, J.M.; Resch, G.; Que, Y.A. Synergistic Interaction Between Phage Therapy and Antibiotics Clears Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Infection in Endocarditis and Reduces Virulence. J. Infect. Dis. 2017, 215, 703–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Chan, B.K.; Turner, P.E.; Kim, S.; Mojibian, H.R.; Elefteriades, J.A.; Narayan, D. Phage Treatment of an Aortic Graft Infected with Pseudomonas Aeruginosa. Evol. Med. Public Heal. 2018, 2018, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Hernando, M.; Barrero, L.; Villalobos, A. Resistencia Bacteriana a Los Antimicrobianos en el Ambito Hospitalario; Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos: Lima, Peru, 2018; pp. 1–17. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. PRISMA flowchart illustrating the search and selection of the articles.
Figure 1. PRISMA flowchart illustrating the search and selection of the articles.
Ijms 23 04577 g001
Figure 2. Number of infections caused by each of the multidrug-resistant bacteria mentioned in the articles.
Figure 2. Number of infections caused by each of the multidrug-resistant bacteria mentioned in the articles.
Ijms 23 04577 g002
Table 2. Characteristics of the bacteriophages used for the treatment of infections.
Table 2. Characteristics of the bacteriophages used for the treatment of infections.
Author(s)/
Reference
Phage/Cocktail IdentificationNumber of Phages in the CocktailPhage Order or Family Route of AdministrationConcentration Per Unit Dose/Duration of TreatmentAntibiotics
Ooi, M.L. et al.
[37]
Cocktail AB-SA013MyoviridaeNasal irrigation3 × 108–109 PFU, for 14 daysNA
Schooley, R.T. et al.
[25]
AB-Navy1-AB-Navy4-AB-Navy71-AB-Navy97-AbTP3Φ1-AC4-C1P12-C2P21-C2P24, cocktails ΦPC-ΦIV-ΦIVB8Myoviridae-Podoviridae (AbTP3Φ1)Intravenous-Intracavitary5 × 109 PFU, for 2 to 16 weeksMeropenem, fluconazole, and minocycline
Jault, P. et al.
[23]
Cocktail PP113112Not reportedTopical1 × 106 PFU, for 7 daysNA
Law, N. et al.
[34]
Cocktail ABPA014Not reportedIntravenous4 × 109 PFU, for 8 weeksCiprofloxacin, piperacillin–tazobactam, doripenem
Aslam, S. et al.
[19]
Cocktails AB-PA01, AB-PA01-m1, Navy 1, Navy 24, 5, 2, 3Not reportedIntravenousBetween 5.3 × 106 PFU and 5 × 109 PFU for 3 to 5 weeksPiperacillin-tazobactam and colistin
Cocktail AB-PA014Piperacillin-tazobactam, tobramycin, and inhaled colistin
BdPF16phi42811Meropenem, ceftazidime-avibactam, minocycline, and tobramycin
Nir-Paz, R. et al.
[35]
ФAbKT21phi3 and ФKpKT21phi12Not reportedIntravenous5 × 107 PFU for 5 daysColistin and
meropenem
Tkhilaisshvili, T. et al.
[33]
Local phage adjuvantsNot reportedNot reportedIntravenous (local administration system)108 PFU for 5 daysColistin, meropenem, and ceftazidime
Corbellino, M. et al.
[28]
vB_KpnM_GFNot reportedNot reportedOral and intrarectalDid not report concentration, for 3 weeksNA
Duplessis, C. et al.
[36]
Phage cocktail2Not reportedIntravenous3.5 × 105 PFU, did not specify duration of treatmentNA
Qin, J. et al.
[24]
Phage cocktails Ф902, ФJD905, ФJD907, ФJD908, JD9105Podoviridae, Myoviridae (ФJD905)Irrigations5 × 108 PFU for 4 weekspiperacillin–
tazobactam, imipenem, amikacin
Tan, X. et al.
[26]
Unique Ab_SZ3 phage1SiphoviridaeAirway (vibrating mesh nebulizer)Increasing concentrations: 5 × 106 on day 1 to 2.5 × 107 PFU, day 2 with 108 PFU, day 4 with 109 PFU, and day 13 with 5 × 1010 PFU for 16 daysTigecycline and
polymyxin E
Hoyle, N. et al.
[29]
Phage cocktail2SiphoviridaeInhalation (compressor nebulizer)3 × 108 PFU for 20 daysPiperacillin-
tazobactam
Leiter, L. et al.
[38]
PYO cocktailNot reportedNot reportedIntravesical instillation104 to 105 PFU for 7 daysNA
Cano, E.J. et al.
[30]
Phage KpJH46Φ21Not reportedPeripheral intravenous40 doses of 6.3 × 1010 PFU/mL for 30 min plus minocyclineMinocycline
Gupta, P. et al.
[44]
Phage cocktail3Not reportedTopical0.1 mL/cm2 (a concentration of 109 PFU/mL from 9 to 13 days)NA
Lebeaux, D. et al.
[45]
JW Delta, JWT, and 2-1 cocktails
(APC 1.1)
3Not reportedInhalation (vibrating mesh nebulizer)4 × 1010 PFU (3 nebulizations/day of 5 mL of solution). Did not specify the duration of treatment.Imipenem
Cocktail 2, plus phage JW alpha
(APC 2.1)
4Not reportedAdministered to the lungs using a fibroscope and through nebulization5 × 109 PFU/mL. Did not specify the duration of treatment.NA
Nadareishvili, L. et al.
[40]
Staphylococcal bacteriophage, PYO bacteriophage, and SES bacteriophage3Not reportedTopical and oralDid not specify the concentration; 10 mL once a day for 20 days and then for 2 weeksNA
Staphylococcus bacteriophage and Intesti bacteriophage2Not reportedTopical and oralDid not specify the concentration; 10 mL once a day for 20 days initially and then for 15 daysNA
Staphylococcus bacteriophage and Intesti bacteriophage2Not reportedTopical and oralDid not specify the concentration; 10 mL once a day for 20 days initially and then for 20 days NA
Pyo bacteriophage and Intesti bacteriophage2Not reportedTopical and oralDid not specify the concentration; 10 mL once a day for 20 days initially and then for 20 days. Solcoseryl (epithelial regenerator) was also used.NA
Patel, D.R.
et al.
[46]
Phage cocktailNot reportedNot reportedTopicalDid not specify the concentration or the duration of treatment; 500 μL/cm2, 5–7 applicationsNA
Fadlallah, A. et al.
[31]
Phage SATA-8505 (ATCC PTA-9476)1Not reportedTopical (eye drops and nasal spray) and general (intravenous)Did not specify the concentration, for 4 weeksNA
Jennes, S. et al.
[41]
BFC1 Cocktail2Not reported50 microliters administered through intravenous infusion for 6 h over 10 days. Wounds were irrigated with 50 mL of BFC1 every 8 h for 10 days.Did not specify the concentration, for 10 daysNA
Kuipers, S. et al.
[42]
Anti-Klebsiella pneumoniae phagesNot reportedNot reportedOral and bladder irrigation/
intravesical
Did not report the concentration, for 8 weeksNA
Onsea, S. et al.
[43]
COCKTAIL BCF13Not reportedTopical and in marrow107 PFU/mL for 7 daysVancomycin,
rifampicin,
moxifloxacin
COCKTAIL BCF13Not reportedTopical 107 PFU/mL for 10 daysVancomycin, colistin, fosfomycin
COCKTAIL BCF13Not reportedTopical 107 PFU/mL for 9 daysVancomycin,
clindamycin,
moxifloxacin
PYO phageNot reportedNot reportedTopical 107 PFU/mL for 7 daysAmoxicillin
Wu, N. et al.
[27]
Phage 1Ф (ФAb124)1PodoviridaeRespiratory by inhalation108 PFU/mL for 20 min, two doses with 1 h intervalNA
Cocktail 2Ф (ФAb124 and ФAb121)2Podoviridae and MyoviridaeRespiratory by inhalation1 × 1010 PFU, did not specify concentrationNA
Cocktail 2Ф (ФAb124 and ФAb121)2Podoviridae and MyoviridaeRespiratory by inhalation and topical with a wet compress1 × 1010 PFU, did not specify concentrationNA
Cocktail 2Ф (ФAb124 and ФAb121)2Podoviridae and MyoviridaeRespiratory by inhalation1 × 1010 PFU, did not specify concentrationNA
Cocktail 2Ф (ФAb124 and ФAb121)2Podoviridae and MyoviridaeRespiratory by inhalation1 × 1010 PFU, did not specify concentrationNA
Bao, J. et al.
[22]
Cocktail I (SZ-1, SZ-2, SZ-3, SZ-6) against the CX7224 strain5Not reportedBladder irrigation5 × 108 PFU per mL of each phage for 5 daysNA
Cocktail II (Kp165, Kp166, Kp167, Kp158, and Kp169) for the CX8070 strain5Not reportedBladder irrigationDid not specify the concentration, for 5 daysNA
Cocktail III (Kp152, Kp154, Kp155, Kp164, Kp6377, and HD001)6Not reportedBladder irrigationSMZ-TMP administered orally (800–160 mg) twice daily, plus the cocktail for 5 daysNA
Rose, T. et al.
[39]
BFC-1 cocktail (P. aeruginosa phage 14/1, S. aureus phages ISP and PNM)3Podoviridae and MyoviridaeTopical109 PFU/mL, did not specify the duration of treatment Ceftazidime or
meropenem in
combination with amikacin.
Vancomycin or
linezolid.
Rubalskii, E. et al.
[32]
Staphylococcus phage CH1, Enterococcus phage Enf1, Pseudomonas phage PA5, Pseudomonas phage PA104Myoviridae, Siphoviridae, Myoviridae, MyoviridaeLocal1 × 108 PFU/mlCefepime,
daptomycin, linezolid, tobramycin
Klebsiella phage KPV811, Klebsiella phage KPV152Podoviridae, MyoviridaeRespiratory by inhalation, via nasogastric tube 1 × 108 PFU/mlCeftazidime, linezolid, avibactam, colistin, meropenem,
cotrimoxazole,
tobramycin
Staphylococcus phage CH11Myoviridaelocal application via drainage1 × 109 PFU/mlRifampicin,
flucloxacillin
Staphylococcus phage CH11Myoviridaelocal application via drainage1 × 109 PFU/mlDaptomycin
Staphylococcus phage Sa30, Staphylococcus phage CH1, Staphylococcus phage SCH1, Staphylococcus phage SCH1114Myoviridae, Myoviridae, Podoviridae, PodoviridaeLocal
application via drainage,
intranasal
1 ×109 PFU/mlDaptomycin
Staphylococcus phage Sa301MyoviridaeLocally,
intraoperatively mixed with
fibrin glue
4 × 1010 PFU/mlSultamicillin
Escherichia phage ECD7, Escherichia phage V182MyoviridaeLocally,
intraoperatively mixed with
fibrin glue
4 × 1010 PFU/mlClindamycin
Pseudomonas phage PA5, Pseudomonas phage PA102MyoviridaeLocally, intraoperatively mixed with
fibrin glue
4 ×1010 PFU/mlColistin, ceftazidime, avibactam
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Aranaga, C.; Pantoja, L.D.; Martínez, E.A.; Falco, A. Phage Therapy in the Era of Multidrug Resistance in Bacteria: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 4577. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23094577

AMA Style

Aranaga C, Pantoja LD, Martínez EA, Falco A. Phage Therapy in the Era of Multidrug Resistance in Bacteria: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(9):4577. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23094577

Chicago/Turabian Style

Aranaga, Carlos, Lady Daniela Pantoja, Edgar Andrés Martínez, and Aura Falco. 2022. "Phage Therapy in the Era of Multidrug Resistance in Bacteria: A Systematic Review" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 9: 4577. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23094577

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop