Abstract
Biologically active taxanes, present in small- to medium-sized evergreen conifers of various Taxus species, are widely used for their antioxidant, antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory effects, but mostly for their antitumour effects used in the treatment of solid tumours of the breast, ovary, lung, bladder, prostate, oesophagus and melanoma. More of the substances found in Taxus plant extracts have medical potential. Therefore, at the beginning of this review, we describe the methods of isolation, identification and determination of taxanes in different plant parts. One of the most important taxanes is paclitaxel, for which we summarize the pharmacokinetic parameters of its different formulations. We also describe toxicological risks during clinical therapy such as hypersensitivity, neurotoxicity, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, haematological, skin and renal toxicity and toxicity to the respiratory system. Since the effect of the drug-form PTX is enhanced by various Taxus spp. extracts, we summarize published clinical intoxications and all fatal poisonings for the Taxus baccata plant. This showed that, despite their significant use in anticancer treatment, attention should also be focused on the risk of fatal intoxication due to ingestion of extracts from these plants, which are commonly found in our surroundings.
Keywords:
natural taxanes; paclitaxel; plant composition; pharmacokinetics; toxicity; intoxication; Taxus baccata; death 1. Introduction
Over millions of years, plants have evolved and adapted to withstand bacteria, insects, fungi, animals and humans, and extreme conditions, and to produce unique, structurally diverse secondary metabolites. Plants have been documented for their medicinal uses for thousands of years, and the use of natural products as medicinals is described throughout history in the form of traditional medicines, remedies, decoctions and oils. However, many of these bioactive natural products as well as their medicinal effects have not yet been described.
Historically, the Taxus Gymnosperms are an ancient plant group that originated in the Permian Era, 200–300 million years ago. Although they are outnumbered by angiosperms in terms of species richness, gymnosperms, especially conifers, dominate the world’s forest types and occur in vast temperate landscapes of both hemispheres [1]. Taxaceae are a unique family among gymnosperms. The species name Taxus comes from the poisonous taxanes found in parts of the tree. Some botanists did not consider yew a true conifer because it does not bear seeds in a cone. However, a proper consideration of its evolutionary relationships now places the Taxaceae family firmly among the conifers [1]. Eight genera of the Taxus species are typically recognized. Taxus baccata (European or English yew), Taxus brevifolia (Pacific or western yew), Taxus canadensis (Canadian yew), Taxus chinensis (Chinese yew), Taxus cuspidata (Japanese yew), Taxus floridana (Florida yew), Taxus globosa (Mexican yew) and Taxus wallichiana (Himalayan yew) [2]. Taxus baccata or European yew is widespread in the temperate zones of the northern hemisphere. It is a small- to medium-sized evergreen tree that has historically been used for weapons and medicine. Apart from the fleshy skin of the fruit, it is poisonous. Zhou et al. analysed a total of 2246 substances of primary and secondary metabolism, of which in T. media, T. cuspidata and T. maieri, most substances were part of the “diterpenoid biosynthesis” pathway, which produces paclitaxel (PTX). The components of individual taxanes differ between individual plants and in individual plant parts, and their amount also depends on the actual season [3]. PTX concentration in T. cuspidata, T. media, and T. mairei is 1.67, 1.22, and 0.66 mg/g, respectively. Paclitaxel (Taxol A) was isolated from Taxus plants and has been widely used since 1984 in the treatment of various cancers (mainly tumours of the breast, ovaries, pancreas or stomach) [4], while in order to improve the effect, new ways of administering this drug are constantly being developed [5,6,7,8,9]. The reason is mainly the achievement of a better biological effect in the exact target place in different types of tissues [10,11] with the least possible number of side effects and at the same time bypassing various resistant mechanisms of tumour cells (overexpression of multidrug resistance (MDR) efflux transporters or by microtubule alterations) [8,12]. Therefore, it is good to know both how paclitaxel works when administered by itself and how this drug behaves when it is part of the plant in which it occurs naturally. For example, in an animal study, 10-Deacetylbaccatine III (10-DAB III, also a taxane with antitumor effect) reached higher concentrations in the blood, lungs, kidney, brain, liver, heart, and spleen throughout the time range of concentration measurement when T. chinensis extract was administered compared to the administration of pure 10-DAB III substance [11]. In various plants as well as Taxus spp., different mechanisms have been observed where the components of the same plant can have a synergistic effect of biologically active substances, which can ultimately have a positive or negative effect [13,14,15]. Recently, one of the improvements in the effect of PTX is its combination with the Taxus extract itself. In an animal study, it was observed that orally administered PTX together with T. yunnanensis extract increased its pharmacokinetic parameters (area under curve (AUC) and maximum serum concentration (Cmax)) due to the inhibition of PTX efflux in the gastrointestinal tract. In addition, it was later observed that this extract potentiates PTX-induced cytotoxicity, i.e., exerts an anti-cancer effect through oral administration [16]. Similarly, it was also observed in the combination of PTX with other extracts from Taxus spp. (e.g., T. chinensis), where the distribution of PTX into the tissues also increased [17]. Originally, paclitaxel was commercially isolated from the bark of Taxus baccata, the European yew tree, which contains the greatest amount of this compound among all kinds of yew [15]. In addition to PTX, natural taxanes extracted from Taxus spp. (mainly T. baccata) contain a wide range of alkaloids, the most famous of which are: taxine A, taxine B and paclitaxel (taxol A), as well as other alkaloids milosine, ephedrine, taxicatin glycoside and their derivatives and natural dyes from the flavonoid group [18]. The above-mentioned molecules could have a mutually supportive and synergistic effect [19].
When using PTX or extracts from Taxus spp. or their combination, especially with T. baccata, however, one must be extremely careful since its use is associated with high cardio-toxicity described in several clinical case reports [20]. Moreover, its use has been linked to several deaths [21,22].
This comprehensive review offers a strong basis for choosing appropriate methods for the isolation, identification and quantification of new or already known substances found in Taxus spp. One of these substances is paclitaxel, belonging to the most important chemotherapy drugs, for which we describe the basic mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in humans. The importance of this article can also be seen in the last sections, where the adverse effects of PTX treatment on organ systems, mechanisms of toxicity, and intoxication are summarized not only in the case of PTX, but also in the case of the use of the plant itself, often ending in death. We also point out that in addition to the observed unwanted toxic effects during treatment, their correlation with actual blood levels of taxane would be useful, especially in cases of patients non-responding to chemotherapy. It is similar to clinical cases of poisoning, where current levels of taxanes in the blood and their correlation with symptoms of acute intoxication are required.
2. Taxus spp. and Biologically Active Compounds
2.1. Overall Distribution of Compounds
Regarding the distribution of taxanes between individual plant genera, the content of paclitaxel (PTX), baccatine III (BAC III), 10-deacetyl paclitaxel (10-DAT) and 10-deacetylbaccatine III (10-DAB III) was compared in T. media, T. mairei and T. cuspidata. It was found that paclitaxel is most represented in T. cuspidata and least in T. mairei. Baccatine III is the most abundant in T. cuspidata and the least in T. media. 10-Deacetyl paclitaxel is most represented in T. cuspidata and least in T. mairei, while 10-deacetylbaccatine III most in T. mairei and least in T. media [23]. Poupat et al. (1999) compared the content of paclitaxel and 10-DAB III in the leaves of individual trees. They found that the lowest content of paclitaxel and 10-DAB III in T. breviolia is 0–15 and 77.4–297.6 µg/g, respectively. The highest content of paclitaxel was 0–169 µg/g in T. cuspidata, and the highest content of 10-DAB III in T. wallichiana was 247.6–594.9 µg/g. The content of paclitaxel decreased in the order T. cuspidate > T. canadensis > T. floridana > T. wallichiana > T. brevifolia [24]. Based on Table 1, it is possible to see that paclitaxel is most represented specifically in the tree part of T. cuspidata (46–1670 µg/g), T. media (15–1220 µg/g), T. mairei (<100–660 µg/g), T. chinesis (15–90 µg/g), T. yunnanensis (84 µg/g) and the least paclitaxel contains T. fuana (27 µg/g). For BAC III, the trend is as follows: T. cuspidata > T. mairei > T. media > T. yunnanensis > T. chinesis > T. fuana. Regarding the sum of concentrations of substances PTX, BAC III, 10-DAT, 10-DABIII, 7-epi-10-deacetylpaclitaxel (7-epi-10-DAP), cephalomannine (CEPH), 7-epi-deacetylbaccatine (7-E-DAB), 7-xyl-10- deacetylpaclitaxel (7-xyl-10-DAT), 7-epitaxol in the tree part of the selected trees, the highest concentration of these substances are in T. cuspidata (5137.4 µg/g), T. media (3502.2 µg/g), T. mairei (2540 µg/g), T. chinesis (2036.2 µg/g), T. yunnanensis (1124 µg/g) and the smallest concentration in T. fuana (322 µg/g) (Table 1). Comparing the total maximum concentration of taxanes in the needles of T. chinesis and T. baccata trees, 1964 µg/g and 893 µg/g was found, respectively, which is a more than two-fold difference (Table 1). Concentration of paclitaxel in woody parts is at most 10 times higher than in needles and more than 300 times higher than in red arils. For DAB III, it was observed that the highest concentration was in woody parts, then in needles, and the lowest in red arils. This trend can also be observed for other taxanes. Individual Taxus trees could be distinguished on the basis of some characteristic substances present in the given species or based on the given concentrations. There is high inter- and intra-species variability in taxane content [25,26], and it has been shown that this variability can depend on the season and taxoid type. The concentration of 10-DAB in first- and second-year needles of T. baccata grown in a Polish garden was highest in January and lowest in April [3], while in a study in Tehran, Iran [6], the highest concentration in yew needles was reached in August. The bark of T. baccata grown in the forests of the Czech Republic showed that the highest concentration of PTX and three other taxanes was in October and the lowest in January [27].
Table 1.
Overview of the latest methods for analysing the composition of Taxaceae spp. for the last 5 years. The table does not include publications focused on in vitro, in vivo, clinical or forensic studies.
2.2. Physiochemical Properties of Biologically Active Taxanes
Taxanes belong to the most diverse group of pharmaceutically important natural tricyclic diterpenes [54]. They are formed in gymnosperms (Gymnospermophyta) belonging to the order Cupressales, family Taxaceae and species Taxus with genera such as T. baccata (English or European yew), T. brevifolia (Pacific or Western yew), T. canadensis (Canadian yew), T. celebica (Chinese yew), T. cuspidata (Japanese yew), T. floridana (Florida yew), T. globosa (Mexican yew), T. wallichiana (Himalayan yew) and T. fuana (West Himalayan yew). Wang et al. comprehensively described the structures of taxanes and divided them into 11 types according to their carbon ring system (6/8/6, 6/5/5/6, 6/10/6, 5/7/6, 5/6/6, 6/12, 6/8/6/6, 6/5/5/5/6, 5/5/4/6/6/6, and 8/6). According to the order of their discovery, they are divided into 10 types of taxane skeletons (I-X), and based on skeleton/substitution patterns, they were divided into 28 groups representing more than 600 isolated substances from various yews [40,55]. From this huge number of substances, it is obvious that their structure is very variable, and their side chains will play important roles. Among these secondary metabolites with anticancer activity, the most pharmacologically important is taxol (Figure 1), also known as paclitaxel (PTX) (5β, 20-epoxy-1,2α, 4,7β, 13α-hexahydroxytax-11-en-9one-4,10-diacetate-2-benzoate-13 ester with (2R,3S)-N-benzoyl-3-phenylisoserine) [56]. The core of taxol’s structure is a skeleton motif (6/8/6), which has several functional groups including two OH groups, one benzoyl group, two acetyl groups and an oxetane ring (Figure 1). Taxol itself as well as its side chains have been intensively studied, while we will only mention the biological activity of individual structures in general. Mazumder et al. reported that the acetyl group at C-10 is responsible for the variability of taxol analogs. The substituent at C-13 (it is H in paclitaxel, and an OH group in Baccatin III, Figure 1), the OH group at C-1, and the substituent at C-2 are significant variables for bioavailability. The oxetane ring (D-ring) is essential for enhanced activity [57]. Hao et al. describe that affinity for P-gp (P-glycoprotein, MDR1 and ABCB1) is largely dependent on the number and strength of hydrogen bonds in a compound. If C-10 is modified to PTX or Taxol C (the same as taxol with a small change to the C-13 substituent), the interaction with P-gp is reduced, and thus, they are not effluxed through the blood–brain barriers or out of the tumour cell [58]. Wang et al. describe that the 6/8/6 membered ring and free hydroxy group at C-2 are important for PTX activity. C-13 is important for bioviability (see above), but at the same time, removal of the side chain abolished its antimitotic and antimicrotubule activity. Although C-7 and C-10 in PTX interact with tubulin, C-13, C-2 and C-4 are more important for this interaction [40]. Most recently, Jara et al. summarized that the taxane ring, C-13 side chain, D-ring and 2’ position of the hydroxyl group and the hemochiral ester chain are essential for its correct antitumoral activity [4]. Matesanz et al. [59] observed that hydroxyl groups at C-7 and C-10 in cephalomannine (Figure 1) interact with microtubules, but are not essential for the antitumor activity in PTX [4].
Figure 1.
Structures of selected taxanes.
Paclitaxel is a white to off-white crystalline powder. It is insoluble in water (5.56 × 10−3 g/L), with a melting point near 216 °C, and it is highly lipophilic. In addition, Taxol is unstable in many commonly used solvents and at temperatures above 60 °C. One of the problems was also related to its low solubility in water (poor oral bioavailability) and the fact that the drug was isolated in a very low yield [60]. Low solubility in water and high lipophilicity are related to its polar surface area (PSA). Table 2 describes the PSA values of PTX and some taxanes (134–221 Å), indicating their different solubility in water. In addition, synthetic/semisynthetic taxanes have a significantly higher PSA (222.88 ± 23.14 Å), which is also related to their poor oral bioavailability [58,61]. That is also why the development of various methods of administration to improve oral bioavailability (drug delivery transport) began, for example by binding to various carriers, different formulations arise, such as Cremophor EL (solvent based formulation of PTX), nab-paclitaxel (nab-P, albumin-bound nanoparticle formulation of PTX), polymer micellar PTX (monomethoxy poly(ethylene glycol)– block–poly(D,L -lactide) polymer formulation of PTX) and micellar formulation of paclitaxel encapsulated in the proprietary retinoid compound XR-17 (mixture of two iso-forms of N-retinoyl-L-cysteic acid methyl ester sodium salt) [4,10,62].
Table 2.
Characteristics of selected taxanes, including molecular weight, general formula, polarity. Data were obtained from https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ (accessed on 5 November 2022).
2.3. Method of Analysis in Taxus spp.
Advances in research related to the development and improvement of therapeutic procedures have led to a growing interest in analytical methods aimed at identifying and quantifying molecules in various plant parts of the Taxaceae familia. These methods should be relevantly optimized to achieve the highest possible sensitivity and specificity for the analytical signal of interest, lower consumption of extraction reagents or the fastest possible analyses. Simplification of pre-analytical sample processing and faster analyses are beneficial for reducing error sources in method validation and at the same time are necessary for current monitoring of taxane levels in clinical studies or the search for new biologically active substances [63,64]. Using these recent simplifications, the gentlest methods are supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) and ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE). Although SFE uses non-toxic solvents (water or carbon dioxide), its industrial applicability is hindered by the use of complex, expensive equipment and relatively low product yields. Alternatively, UAE combines ultrasound treatment and conventional Soxhlet extraction (SE) [65] with solid/liquid systems being the most common candidates for UAE. One of its main advantages lies in the enhancement of the mass transfer brought about by acoustic-induced cavitation in a liquid medium [35,66]. This mechanism allows researchers to use a reduced amount of organic solvents compared to Soxhlet extraction.
In the literature, several analytical methods have been described for the quantification of taxanes in various matrices. These methods include, for example, immunoassays and micellar electrokinetic chromatography (MEKC). However, most techniques involve the use of high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled with an ultraviolet (UV) or mass spectrometric (MS) detector due to higher sensitivity and resolution, as well as the ability to work with different types of matrices (Table 1). In addition, the HPLC technique is used as a standard method in the pharmaceutical industry. Besides HPLC, gas chromatography (GC) and gas chromatography–mass spectroscopy (GC-MS), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and/or nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) are also used (Table 1). Their disadvantage is that the development of new methods focuses mainly on the detection of biologically active substances in extracts from the Taxaceae familia, while analytical procedures for the detection of these substances in human biological samples are rarely developed (See Section 4).
The fastest and the most sensitive method for taxane analysis published in the last 5 years (Table 1) is the ultra-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) method, which was developed for the simultaneous determination of seven taxanes and seven flavonoids in twigs and leaves of three species from the Taxaceae familia. The LOQs of all analytes ranged from 0.01 to 1.66 ng/mL. The method had the best validation parameters of all the published works described in present paper, with the extraction taking just over 20 min and the analysis 5 min [67].
As can be seen from Table 1, the most monitored plants in the last 5 years were T. cuspidata, T. chinesis and T. baccata. Six articles also described the analytes found in T. media. As for the plant parts, leaves are the most researched, with up to 13 articles devoted to them. In addition to leaves, stems, twigs, red arils, sapwood, heartwood, essential oil, roots and branches were analysed. Carotenoids, amino acids, taxanes, vitamin C, polyphenols, macroelements, microelements, antioxidants, flavonoids, fatty acids, proteins, lipids, carbohydrates, xanthophyll esters were observed in red arils. Flavonoids, phenols, polysaccharides and, last but not least, mainly taxanes were observed in the needles. Various ethers, alcohols, acids, flavonoids, ketones, phenols, esters were monitored in the tree part. Aldehydes, pyridines, fatty acids, volatile substances, alkanes, lipids, nucleotides, amino acids, alkaloids, vitamins, terpenes, cofactors, carbohydrates, phenylpropanoids, hormones, antioxidants and taxanes were described in twigs. The most frequently used analytical methods were liquid chromatography, either high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection (HPLC-UV), high-performance liquid chromatography with diode-array detection (HPLC-DAD), liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry (LC-MS), ultra-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS), liquid chromatography with quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-QTOF), or high-performance liquid chromatography with photodiode array detection (HPLC-PDA). This was followed by the use of the gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) method; the least used were ultraviolet–visible spectroscopy (UV-VIS), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), gas chromatography with flame ionisation detector (GC-FID), thin-layer chromatography (TLC), high-resolution mass spectrometry (HR-MS) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). The distribution of individual taxanes in different parts of the plant is not uniform. The concentration of taxanes in red arils was in the range 3.9–38 µg/g for 10-DAB III; BAC III 1–28 µg/g; CEPH 0.04–7.2 µg/g; taxinine M 0.02–2 µg/g; paclitaxel (PTX) 0.02–5.5 µg/g. In needles, the concentration range was as follows: 10-DAB III 21.1–703.4 µg/g; PTX 9.31–162.75 µg/g; 10-diacetyltaxol 14.7–236.49 µg/g; BAC III trace-120.48 µg/g; CEPH 19.2–105.69 µg/g; 7-xyl-10-DAT 351.44–546.95 µg/g; 7-epi-10-DAT 94.45–166.44 µg/g. The highest concentration range for paclitaxel 30–1670 µg/g was observed in woody parts: BAC III 5–800 µg/g; 10-DAP 100–850 µg/g; 10-DAB III 50–1000 µg/g; 7-E-10-DAP 170–300 µg/g; CEPH 30–150 µg/g.
Monitoring the composition of Taxaceae plant species can be helpful in the search and isolation of new biologically active substances, precursors for the synthesis of new drugs and, last but not least, for the diagnosis of intoxication.
3. Pharmacology of Taxanes
3.1. Molecular Mechanism of Action
The cytoskeleton is a strictly and specifically arranged system of filaments, which is involved in cell division, intracellular movement of organelles and building cellular materials, and last but not least, maintains the necessary shape of the cell. We know three types of filaments: intermediate filaments, microtubules and actin filaments. Microtubules ensure the position of membrane-enclosed organelles, control intracellular transport and play an essential role in cell division. They have the shape of long hollow cylinders formed by the protein subunit tubulin, which is a heterodimer composed of α-tubulin and β-tubulin (α-β interaction). They connect vertically to each other so that the top of the β monomer in the heterodimer is connected to the bottom of the α monomer in the next heterodimer to form a single-chain protofilament (β-α interaction). Protofilaments arise in different numbers in different cells. Mostly thirteen protofilaments form through lateral α-α and β-β interactions in the cylindrical hollow structures—microtubules [68,69,70]. Monomer α-tubulin permanently binds guanosine-5’-triphosphate (GTP) at the dimer interface. Monomer β-tubulin binds GTP and guanosine-5’-diphosphate (GDP), which are important in the growing (polymerisation) and shrinking (depolymerisation) of microtubules, respectively. If the concentration of heterodimers with bound GTP or GDP is higher or lower than the critical concentration, microtubule polymerization or depolymerisation occurs, respectively. The critical concentration of tubulin may vary between species. For example, mung tubulin is up to 10 times lower than for brain tubulin [70]. The end of microtubules, where the polymerisation and depolymerisation of microtubules is more dynamic, is called plus (+), the other end is then minus (-). Natural taxanes such as paclitaxel (PTX) or cephalomannine (CPH) bind in the cavity of this cylindrical structure (called the nucleus or lumenal site), which prevents the polymerisation of microtubules (in “freezing” effect, stabilising them “kinetically”). [59]. These taxanes are also used as microtubule-stabilising agents in the study of the pathway of microtubule assembly. Matesanz et al. described in detail the luminal site and pore site as model binding sites for taxanes. These are bound in these places via substituents in the C-7 and C-10 positions, increasing or decreasing the interprotofilament angle, respectively [59]. Binding affinity in these paclitaxel binding sites plays a key role for the biological effect of taxanes and is at the same time a useful tool for detecting the pharmacological effect of potential chemotherapeutics-taxane analogs/derivatives. In vitro measured apparent binding constant (Kb) for PTX is 1.43 ± 0.17 × 107 M−1 [71] and 3.7 × 107 M−1 [72]. In vivo experiments measured the binding equilibrium dissociation constant (Kd) to be significantly higher in RPE1 cells Kd = 5 × 109 ± 0.1 M [73], in HT1080 cells Kd = 7.6 ± 0.9 × 109 M [74] and 5.0 × 109 in MCF7 cells [75]. CPH is Kb = 0.69 ± 0.08 × 107 M−1 [73], and Baccatine III is Kb = 1.5 × 105 M−1 [72] for the PTX binding site. Pineda et al. in the cell lines RPE1 and HT1080 found that loss of microtubule dynamics, micronucleation and mitotic arrest were approximately at 0.1 (10%), 0.2 (20%) and 0.6–1 (60–100%) occupancy of the binding site for PTX, respectively. At the same time, these authors state that in order to completely stop tumour growth in a mouse xenograft tumour model, it is necessary that at least 80% of the binding sites for PTX on microtubules were occupied [74]. However, the binding affinities constants are determined at different temperatures by different methods and in different ways (in vitro or in vivo). The pharmacological effect of a ligand on its binding site can be influenced to some extent by the presence of a drug efflux pump [76]. Kuh et al., however, found that when Pgp-mediated paclitaxel efflux in MCF7 cells is inhibited, PTX passes through by free diffusion, and compared to extracellular binding, the dissociation constant for intracellular binding is approximately 160 times smaller, while the maximum binding capacity is 15 times larger [75].
3.2. Human Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Taxanes
The effect of the drug on the organism should be therapeutically monitored using basic pharmacokinetic parameters (PK), for example its maximum concentration in the blood (Cmax) [77]. However, an even more important parameter is its concentration in the local therapeutic site, in the case of taxanes inside the tumour cell. Only a few studies are describing intracellular concentrations of paclitaxel (PTX). Kuh et al. found that when MCF7 was incubated with PTX in the concentration range of 1–5000 nM, there was a high intracellular-to-extracellular concentration ratio, while after 4 h, the intracellular concentration was the highest (0.31–269,010 ng/mL). Only treatment with 85.4 and 854 ng/mL PTX enhanced the polymerisation significantly, and after 24 h, induction of tubulin production was also observed [75]. In another study, Wang et al. investigated the effect on cycle arrest, tubulin assembly and cell viability when HeLa cells were incubated with 0–85.4 ng/mL AbraxaneTM (albumin nanoparticle-based), further with PGA-PTX, also known as CT-2103 (polymer nanoparticle-based degradable paclitaxel carrier, with poly(L-glutamic acid)-paclitaxel conjugate) and pure PTX. For Abraxane and pure PTX, most cells were arrested in the G2 phase (concentration about 8540 ng/mL) what correlated with inhibiting 50% tubulin assembly. The percentage of viable cells decreased with the increasing number of polymerised tubulin, while the IC50 for Abraxane was 6.9 ng/mL, and for PTX, the IC50 was 11.44 ng/mL. PGA-PTX needed a longer incubation time (72 h) to obtain similar kinetics as the previous two PTX formulations, which was related to its much lower concentration of free PTX in the cell lysate (20 ng/mg protein vs. approximately 80 ng/mg protein). The IC50 for PGA-PTX was 9.4 ng/mL at prolonged exposure to HeLa cells [78]. Determination of the mechanisms of action of PTX at the cellular level, or determination of the intracellular concentration at a known extracellular concentration, represents a direct insight into its effect and can help in clinical studies application.
It is obvious that the pharmacokinetic parameters for PTX will be different (Table 3) if administered in different formulations, alone (monotherapy) or together with other drugs. By reviewing 53 pharmacokinetic studies, Stage and co-authors found non-linear pharmacokinetics where Cremophor EL® and nab-paclitaxel were administered weekly and in 3-week dosing cycles. The time of PTX level in plasma above the threshold effective value (0.05 µmol/L = 42.7 mg/mL) was 23.8 h. For Cremophor EL®, clearance (CL) decreased with increasing dose, in the shorter (1, 3 and 6 h) and in the longer infusion times (24 and 96 h). Cmax values increased with increasing dose at both infusion times and reached higher values at short infusion. A similar dose-dependent trend in CL and Cmax was observed with the nab-PTX formulation [79].
Another study compared the PK parameters of nab-PTX with micellar formulation-PTX, which is formulated with the surfactant XR17 (mixture of two iso-forms of N-retinoyl-L-cysteic acid methyl ester sodium salt) (Table 3). For 28 patients with metastatic breast cancer (Caucasian females, average BSA was 1.7 ± 0.2 kg/m2), the same dose of 260 mg/m2 was administered (1 h intravenous infusion) for both formulations. Micellar PTX and nab-PTX were considered clinically equivalent. Unbound plasma PK profile of PTX reflected above-mentioned total PK profile with concentrations of approximately 5% of the corresponding total concentrations [80]. Clearance was not investigated, but similar PK parameters were observed earlier in a different group of patients (Caucasians) with solid metastatic tumour. CL was approximately 15 L/h/m2, unchanged over the dose range (150–275 mg/m2), and Cmax along with area under the plasma concentration–time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf) increased linearly over the dose range [81]. PTX protein-bound particles for injectable suspension and AbraxaneR were considered as clinically equivalent.
Chinese patients (28) with breast cancer (average body surface area (BSA) = 1.63 kg/m2) received a dose of 260 mg/m2 PTX of two formulations in the form of an infusion lasting 30 min. For both formulations, T1/2 (24.48 ± 4.47 vs. 27.32 ± 10.10 h) was approximately the same [82]. Chinese patients had significantly higher Cmax compared with the studies described thus far (Table 3). This could be due to the shorter duration of the infusion (30 min) with approximately the same formulation and amount of 260 mg/m2/1.63 kg/m2 = 160 mg/kg compared to the study by Borg et al. [81] with a dose of 260 mg/m2/1.7 kg/m2 = 153 mg/kg (duration of infusion 1 h). This was observed earlier when summarizing 53 PK studies [79]. Furthermore, differences in Cmax may be related to ethnic characteristics because at a dose of 260 mg/m2 during a 30 min infusion, European/Americans had significantly higher Cmax (19,556 ng/mL, not shown in the table) [83]. Tumour concentrations of PTX are much lower than plasma concentrations, and thus, it can be assumed that tumour type and size would not affect plasma concentration in the above studies. Pharmacokinetics of PTX in tumour cells is poorly described in the literature. Desai et al. found that in the xenograft tumour, the highest concentration of PTX formulations was around 1 h after a dose of 20 mg/kg and reached a value of approximately 7 ng/mg [84]. At a dose of 50 or 100 mg/m2 PTX together with carboplatin or concomitant radiotherapy to fourteen patients (median body surface area, BSA = 2.1) once per week with an infusion duration of 1 h, it was found that after 4 h from the dose, the concentration of PTX inside the tumour (oesophageal tumour) was 2.91 ng/mg. This was significantly higher than in its surroundings (oesophageal mucosa = 2 ng/mg). Total amount of active drug that reaches the systemic circulation (AUC 0–48 h, 1500–10,000 ng·h/mL) and the concentration taken 4 h (50–350 ng/mL) after the dose were positively correlated with the intratumoral concentration (approximately 1.5–7.0 ng/mg). The concentration in the oesophageal mucosa did not correlate with these parameters and was approximately the same at the beginning and at the end of the PTX dosing cycle [85].
The following studies were unique in their parameters, for example by examining the relationship between steady state concentration (Css) and antitumor response. Css, AUC, and total body clearance CL were analysed in 48 patients at a dose of Cremophore EL 250 mg/m2 by 24 h infusion every 21 days (Table 3). The high frequency of hematologic effects prevented the investigation of the relationship between Css and antitumor response, and as the authors concluded, the solution would be lower doses [86].
Similarly, Rowinsky et al. in 1999 stated that with Css, the binding sites may already be saturated and the trend between concentration and effect on the organism could only be observed at low doses. The dose was 75 mg/m2 cisplatin i.v., combined with either a low dose of paclitaxel (135 mg/m2, 24-h i.v., infusion) for 78 patients or a higher dose of paclitaxel (250 mg/m2 i.v., 24-h i.v.) for 87 patients with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. The authors observed the lack of relationships between disease outcome, and both paclitaxel dose and Css were obtained. Moreover, no relationship was observed between Css and the tendency to develop neurotoxicity, but the relationship with the development of the worst degree of leucopoenia was significant [87].
Hurria et al. found that Cmax increases with patient age in 40 patients (mean age 60, (30–81) years) with metastatic breast cancer. However, there was no significant difference in toxicity, dose reduction, or dose omissions in older versus younger adults [88].
Table 3.
Human pharmacokinetic parameters at different PTX formulations.
Table 3.
Human pharmacokinetic parameters at different PTX formulations.
| PTX Formulation | Dose (mg/m2) | Cmax (ng/mL) | Tmax (h) | CL | AUC (h ng/mL) | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cremophor EL® nab-paclitaxel | 175 (135–240) | median 4335 (2635–8160) | na | median 12 L/h/m2 | na | [79] |
| Micellar PTX | 260 | 8006 ± 1703 | 50 ± 17 | na | 13,484 ± 3491 (0–10 h) | [80,81] |
| nab-paclitaxel | 8073 ± 4124 | 46 ± 20 | na | 11,388 ± 3123 (0–10 h) | ||
| PTX Abraxane® | 260 | 12,295 ± 2370 12,771 ± 2065 | 0.5 0.5 | na | 12,587 ± 2932 (0-inf) 13,078 ± 2880 (0-inf) | [82] |
| Cremophore EL® | 250 | 725.9 ± 179.34 (steady state) | na | 256 ± 72 mL·min−1·m−2 | 17,336.2 ± 4355.4 | [86] |
| cisplatin + PTX cisplatin + PTX | 75 + 135 75 + 250 | 273.3 (102–2306); 691 (93.4–3074.4), | na | na | na | [87] |
| nab-PTX | 100 | 5482 ± 3967 | na | 37.16 | 5316 (3001) (0–48 h) | [88] |
3.3. Human Pharmacodynamic Parameters of Taxanes
The most well-known substance from the group of taxanes used as a medicine is taxol A (PTX). It is an antineoplastic substance that is used for first-line therapy and for the subsequent therapy of advanced tumours [4]. The mechanism of action of this drug is non-selective for human cells, but rapidly dividing cells (tumour, hematopoietic, intestinal, skin, etc.) are most affected by this treatment, which can be observed in the change of progression in the tumour disease as well as in the unwanted effect on organ systems. Its mechanism of action is on microtubules [4], and for example in canine mammary carcinoma, it was observed that increasing concentrations of PTX decreased cell viability, increased the percentage of cell apoptosis and increased relative reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels [89]. This causes cell cycle arrest and subsequent cell death. Another antitumor mechanism of paclitaxel is the induction of calcium depletion in the cell mitochondria, which leads to the release of apoptogenic factors and the initiation of apoptosis [90].
For monitoring the drug effect on the body, the dosage strategy (dose, length of administration of the infusion dose, total number of doses, time intervals between individual doses) is important, followed by its maximum concentration in the blood, which should reflect the observable pharmacodynamic effects on the body. Administration of PTX in weekly doses prolongs progression-free survival compared to dosing in three-week intervals but does not improve overall survival, while the incidence of adverse effects is slightly higher [91]. For example, weekly dosing (6 cycles) in ovarian cancer therapy uses a dose of 80 mg/m2 PTX in combination with carboxyplatinum, a three-week dosing schedule uses 175 mg/m2 (6 cycles) [92], and higher incidence of adverse effects in terms of anaemia and neuropathy was observed. A similar trend can be observed in the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer [93]. The results of clinical studies focused on the influence of the dosing strategy on the occurrence of adverse effects are very heterogeneous. Research activity in this area is very extensive. Dosing of taxanes in individual cytostatic schemes during the treatment of various cancer diseases in different disease stages is a complex issue that exceeds the possibilities and scope of this publication.
3.3.1. Common Physiological and Unwanted Effects
Most patients treated with paclitaxel experience adverse effects, the incidence and severity of which depend on the specific composition of the drug, including excipients, patient risk factors, and the chosen cytostatic therapy strategy [94]. Due to the mechanism of action of paclitaxel or taxanes on microtubules, which results in the inhibition of the cell division cycle, in addition to tumour cells, organ systems containing rapidly dividing cells are most often affected, such as: the hematopoietic system and the development of myelosuppression, the neurological system and the development of neuropathy, the gastrointestinal system and the development of the upper and lower dyspepsia, diarrhoea and skin leading to alopecia. The incidence of adverse effects and symptoms of toxicity in the treatment of cancer patients with paclitaxel ranges from 70% to 83.6% [95,96]. Due to the frequent occurrence of adverse effects, which can limit the dosing schedule of paclitaxel, the effort is to find suitable combinations with other substances in order to reduce them. Curcumin appears to be one of the investigated natural substances that can reduce the incidence of unwanted effects [97].
3.3.2. Hypersensitivity Response and Anaphylaxis
Although the administration of paclitaxel is generally safe and well tolerated, cases of hypersensitivity reactions up to fatal anaphylaxis may occur. The occurrence of a hypersensitivity reaction during the administration of paclitaxel is approximately 10% of patients, despite the administered prophylactic therapy with antihistamines and glucocorticoids [98]. The mechanism of the hypersensitivity reaction is not fully known and may occur immediately after the first administration, without prior sensitisation [99]. The hypersensitivity reaction is mainly caused by adjuvants that allow for the transport and transfer of hydrophobic paclitaxel into cells. The most frequently used carrier solution for the drug is polyoxyl 35 castor oil (Cremophor EL®), which acts as an activator of basophils and mast cells and as a direct histamine liberator. Furthermore, allergic or even anaphylactic reactions occur through IgE- and IgG-mediated immune response to paclitaxel and/or adjuvants [98,100]. For this reason, there is a high need for the development of another carrier vehicle for the drug, which will enable a more efficient transfer into the tumorous tissue and reduce the occurrence of adverse effects. The trend in development is the creation of suspensions based on nanoparticles, while nanoparticles can be based on human albumin (nab-paclitaxel, FDA-approved), liposomes (EndoTag-I, LEP-ETU), micelles (Genexol-PM), nanodispersions (substance PICN) and microparticles (substance AI-850) [101]. Nab-paclitaxel has a 33% higher penetration into tumorous tissue compared to conventional paclitaxel [101]. According to a meta-analysis by Chou et. al, who analysed the occurrence and degree of severity of hypersensitivity reaction when using different paclitaxel solutions based on nanoparticles, the liposomal phospholipid emulsion has the lowest incidence of hypersensitivity reactions, in which a lower dose can be administered to achieve the same therapeutic effect [94,101]. A colloidal suspension of albumin-paclitaxel nanoparticles (nab-paclitaxel) created for the purpose of increasing paclitaxel permeation through tumour albumin receptors proved to be 4.5 times more effective compared to conventional PTX [93,102]. An immediate hypersensitivity response usually occurs during the first cycle of drug administration, minutes after the start of the infusion. This response is manifested by flushing, itching, rash with back and chest pain [103]. If hypersensitivity reaction progresses to a moderate severity, symptoms of dyspnoea are added to the symptoms without a decrease in blood oxygen saturation and without a decrease in blood pressure [104]. In a severe stage of hypersensitivity reaction, the reaction is accompanied by hemodynamic instability, a decrease in blood oxygen saturation, nausea and vomiting. Considering that hypersensitivity response or anaphylactic reaction are potentially life-threatening conditions, it is recommended to start premedication with H1, H2 blockers and dexamethasone before administration of standard paclitaxel [98]. Despite the administered premedication, cases of fatal hypersensitivity reactions have been described [99]. Due to the fact that the administration of standard paclitaxel is associated with a hypersensitivity reaction, it is necessary to monitor vital functions during administration and to immediately stop administration at the appearance of the first symptoms. Nab-paclitaxel is to date the only FDA-approved preparation containing taxane-saturated polymer nanoparticles of human albumin non-covalently bound to paclitaxel, which does not require premedication with H1, H2 and glucocorticoids [105].
3.3.3. Neurotoxicity
Neurotoxicity is one of the first and most common symptoms of chemotherapy-related toxicity. The most common first manifestation of neurotoxicity is the development of paresthesis; then, as the symptoms of toxicity progress, sensory disorders, motor disorders, and autonomic nervous dysregulation occur. Primarily, the first symptoms occur on the distal parts of the limbs and progress proximally [96]. The emergence of this peripheral neuropathy is explained by the arrest of the growth of distal part of the axons of sensory neurons in the skin and proximal parts of the limbs, which causes the sensory symptoms of neurotoxicity described above [106]. Taxanes accumulate in the ganglia of the posterior spinal horns, which causes initial disturbances in axonal transport and changes in Schwann cells, which subsequently lead to ganglion neuropathy and axonopathy. Symptoms of neurotoxicity are a frequent reason for the need to reduce the administered dose of paclitaxel or even to interrupt its administration. The rate of neurotoxicity depends on the type of paclitaxel administered. In the study realised by Guo et al. in 2022, it was found that paclitaxel administered in the form of albumin-paclitaxel nanoparticles, nab-paclitaxel, has a higher anti-tumour effect and a lower incidence of drug resistance, thereby increasing the survival of patients with breast cancer, but on the other hand, it also has a higher incidence of neurotoxic symptoms compared to standard paclitaxel. Atypical symptoms of neurotoxicity include numbness, burning sensations, firing of discharges, hyperalgesia, acute pain syndrome, convulsions, and transient encephalopathy. Neurotoxicity and its manifestations significantly reduce the quality of patient’s life and can lead to paralysis, withdrawal from normal life, and disability. The incidence of nab-paclitaxel toxicity is 70%, and 10% of patients experience a severe grade with significantly reduced quality of life. Symptoms begin to appear during the first cycle of administration and may persist for up to one year [96]. The incidence of taxane-induced neurotoxicity occurs in 13–62% of cases, with severe grade occurring in 5–10%. In cases where patients were treated primarily with taxanes for primary tumour, they showed signs of peripheral neurotoxicity for a long time, and these symptoms significantly reduced their quality of life [107]. Cryotherapy with frozen gloves and socks can be used as a treatment method that has promising results in preventing the occurrence of neuropathy on acres [108].
3.3.4. Gastrointestinal (GIT) Toxicity
Among the most common symptoms of this type of toxicity are nausea, vomitus and diarrhoea, but adverse effects can also lead to the development of severe damage to the GIT, the development of colitis and intestinal perforation. Paclitaxel has a low emetogenic effect and is associated with approximately a 10–30% risk of nausea. The mechanism of toxicity is attributed to the direct binding of the ligand (PTX) to the mucosal Toll-like receptor 4, which mediates damage to the intestinal epithelium [109]. Toll-like receptor 4 is a transmembrane receptor that is found on cell surfaces of macrophages, dendritic cells, and neutrophils, as well as on the surface of epithelial cells lining the respiratory and intestinal tracts. It triggers the inflammatory cascade by activating pro-inflammatory genes [110]. Risk factors for nausea include combination with other more emetogenic chemotherapeutics, younger age, female gender, low alcohol consumption, previous history of motion sickness and gestational nausea. Diarrhoea occurs in approximately 50% of patients, and the mechanism of this toxicity consists in the disruption of the villous part of the enterocyte, disruption of the integrity of enterocytes and an increase in their permeability to toxins [111]. The incidence of taxane-induced colitis is not frequent. In a study by Chen et al. in 2019, the occurrence of taxane-induced colitis was documented in 0.2% of cases, while the development of this disease was a gradual deterioration of GIT functions over time. Treatment with nab-paclitaxel resulted in the development of a more severe degree of colitis compared to conventional paclitaxel, with 100% of nab-paclitaxel-treated patients developing colitis requiring hospitalisation, compared to 34% in case of standard paclitaxel-treated patients [112].
3.3.5. Cardiovascular Toxicity
The cardiotoxicity of taxanes has been known for a long time and occurs at a higher incidence when paclitaxel is administered with other cardiotoxic chemotherapeutics. The exact mechanism is unclear, but several pathophysiological mechanisms have already been identified [113]. A hypersensitivity reaction causes the release of histamine into the bloodstream, which subsequently causes stimulation of the histamine receptors of the myocardium and a change in the conduction system of the heart, which leads to arrhythmias [114]. Bradycardia, as the most common symptom of cardiotoxicity, arises on the basis of central autonomic dysregulation, which is a manifestation of neurotoxicity [115]. The proarrhythmogenic effect is also caused by the interaction of PTX with HERG K channels (human ether-a-go-go), which causes a rapid decrease in the influx of potassium into the cardiomyocytes and causes a prolongation of the QT interval [116]. Another probable mechanism of action of taxanes lies in a direct effect on cardiomyocytes by causing an increased formation of reactive oxygen species in mitochondria, which leads to their damage, and the permeability of mitochondrial membranes increases, which causes cardiomyocyte dysfunction and subsequent myocardial dysfunction [113]. The incidence of taxane cardiotoxicity according to the analysis of registers of adverse effects carried out by Batra et al. is approximately 11.8% [117]. The most common symptom was the occurrence of arterial hypertension requiring hospitalisation in 30.2% of cases. Taxane-induced cardiac symptoms were detected in 16.6% of cases [117]. Myocardial toxicity is manifested by acute or subacute reversible bradycardia, which is typical for paclitaxel, AV blockades, prolongation of the QT interval, atrial or ventricular fibrillation and left ventricular dysfunction [117,118]. Congestive heart failure is less common compared to other antimicrotubular agents such as vinca alkaloids, while in monotherapy, the incidence of cardiotoxicity symptoms is lower compared to combinations. The combination of paclitaxel with anthracyclines causes reduced elimination of anthracyclines in plasma, which increases their toxicity on the cardiovascular system [119,120]. Risk factors for the occurrence of these adverse effects are age, the presence of diabetes mellitus, hypertension and previous radiation therapy of the chest. It is recommended to avoid other combinations of drugs with a cardiogenic effect, such as tricyclic antidepressants or beta-blockers [90]. There is a lack of evidence on the myocardial effects of nab-paclitaxel, the incidence and severity of cardiovascular adverse effects compared to conventional paclitaxel.
3.3.6. Haematological Toxicity, Myelosuppression
One of the most common adverse effects of paclitaxel treatment is neutropenia and immunocompromitation. The mechanism of occurrence of this undesirable effect consists in the direct effect of the taxane on cessation of the division cycle of hematopoietic stem cells. Neutropenia caused by this mechanism is reversible, but directly dependent on the method of administration. Neutropenia is more common with 1 h paclitaxel regimens compared to 3 h regimens. Neutropenia and leukopenia are the most common adverse effects of therapy [90]. At the same time, anaemia and thrombocytopenia are also present in a mild form as a result of complex myelosuppression [121]. In a meta-analysis by Chou et al. in 2020, nab-paclitaxel was found to cause a higher incidence of neutropenia and leukopenia compared to conventional paclitaxel [94]. The treatment of this unwanted effect consists in the administration of colony-stimulating (CSF) or granulocyte colony-stimulating (G-CSF) growth factors [122]. Myelosupression is one of the serious adverse effects that threaten the patient with the development of a life-threatening infection [121].
3.3.7. Respiratory System
The most common adverse effects of paclitaxel affecting the respiratory system are interstitial pneumonitis and capillary leak syndrome, which can develop within hours to weeks after therapy initiation. The most common occurrence of this complication is in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer, breast and prostate tumours [123]. Pneumonitis as an adverse effect of chemotherapy was defined as the presence of an otherwise unexplained worsening of dyspnoea in the last 30 days, the presence of ground-glass-opacities (GGO) or lung consolidations on high-resolution computerized tomography (HRCT), and excluded infectious origin, excluded progression of the tumour process to the lungs (in the lungs), absence of heart failure and no more than 4 weeks since the last dose of chemotherapy [124]. The mechanism of the development of this disease consists in a type IV immune response, a cell-mediated response, when an antigen is presented to T cells and causes their activation [125,126], while nab-paclitaxel also causes pneumonitis but at a lower incidence compared to conventional paclitaxel [127]. Another mechanism of pneumonitis development is the paclitaxel-activated release of tumour necrosis factor α (TNF-α) from macrophages, abnormal expression of cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) and initiation of a pro-inflammatory cascade that directly destroys the alveolar epithelium [128,129,130]. The incidence of this complication is approximately 1-5%, while the severity of the disease is severe to very severe; in the case of using nab-paclitaxel, it is moderate [127]. Patients who require the administration of G-CSF or CSF growth factors during paclitaxel therapy also have a higher incidence of interstitial pneumonitis [131]. Symptoms of pneumonitis include cough, dyspnoea, weakness, malaise, chest tightness, weight loss, and body aches [123,132]. Pulmonary fibrosis is described as a late complication of pneumonitis, which is irreversible damage to the lung parenchyma [133]. Risk factors are mainly pre-existing lung disease, chest radiotherapy, combination with other cytostatics, and taxane dosing strategy (doses higher than 250 mg/m2 are associated with a higher risk; weekly administration is riskier compared to triweekly administration) [133]. High-dose glucocorticoids [134], COX-2 inhibitors [128] and symptomatic therapy are used to treat this toxicity.
3.3.8. Skin Toxicity
Skin toxicity occurs in 89% of patients [135]. Paclitaxel causes many adverse effects on the skin through several mechanisms. It is directly cytotoxic to keratinocytes, causing allergic and hypersensitive reactions of type I and IV, which affect, among other parts, the skin [136]. Another mechanism of toxicity is inhibition of Bcl-2 expression, increase in p53 and p21 expression, decrease in vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), increase in markers of oxidative stress and proinflammatory markers, decrease in markers of elasticity and increased pigment production in melanocytes [137]. The most common taxane-induced skin symptoms typical of a hypersensitivity reaction are rash and pruritus, which are not serious. However, some patients may experience symptoms of hypersensitivity associated with systemic symptoms such as bronchospasm and blood pressure drop [104]. Skin toxicity is characterized by macular and papular skin changes that cause pruritus and pain. Painful, bilaterally occurring inflammatory patches in the axillary and inguinal regions can even have the character of toxic erythema [138]. The occurrence of eczema and folliculitis is also described [139]. Alopecia after administration of paclitaxel is present in at least 60% of patients and causes considerable distress to patients during chemotherapy, while 10% may develop permanent alopecia [140,141]. Toxic manifestations on the nails occur in up to 89%, most often in the form of onycholysis [140].
Cryotherapy can be used to prevent toxic manifestations on the skin and nails, having a good preventive effect and minimal side effects [108]. Lugtenberg et al. carried out research on the effect of cryotherapy on the prevention of alopecia during the administration of paclitaxel in monotherapy, while they found that cooling the head, which begins before the administration of paclitaxel and continues 20–45 min after administration, was effective and led to the prevention of severe alopecia in 78% of cases [142].
3.3.9. Sex Differences in Toxicity
There are differences in the pharmacokinetics, occurrence of adverse effects and responses to administered taxanes between men and women. Men have a faster elimination of the drug compared to women, which predicts a lower incidence of adverse effects in men and at the same time alters the maximum tolerable doses within the treatment plan. Compared to women, men have a 20% higher elimination capacity. Paclitaxel-induced toxic manifestations are more frequent in women, the degree of toxicity is more severe and the duration of adverse effects is longer [143].
3.3.10. Renal Toxicity
Administration of paclitaxel is nephrotoxic already at therapeutic doses. Tubular necrosis and, at higher doses, glomerular atrophy were observed. The mechanism of nephrotoxicity results directly from the effects of paclitaxel on the inhibition of the cell cycle and the occurrence of apoptosis, especially of proximal tubular cells [144].
4. Toxicity of Taxanes
4.1. Clinical (Non-Lethal) Toxicity
Intoxications with plants from the Taxus spp. are not so frequent but may also occur due to the easy availability of this plant. Intoxication with paclitaxel (PTX) is rarer, since it is an infusion dose applied in a hospital, and its availability is thus considerably limited. In addition to the usual unwanted effects associated with the treatment, several cases were observed where PTX or docetaxel (semi-synthetic taxane) was a cause of ethanol intoxication. In one case, PTX was administered by infusion of 600 mg (50 mL of absolute ethanol, equivalent to 1 L of beer) with symptoms of alcohol intoxication with a concentration of ethanol in the blood of 0.98 g/kg [145]. Other authors described that a dose of 300 mg (25 mL of ethanol, 0.5 L of beer) in three hours resulted in a feeling of head pressure, a change in balance, and ataxic gait with a wide base developed, which lasted 4–6 h [146]. During the first infusion of docetaxel (the dose was not given) to one patient with breast cancer, the treatment was interrupted when she was committed to the psychiatry ward because of a relapse of her alcohol addiction [147]. Another study describes a patient who had a ninth cycle of docetaxel 75 mg/m2 and who developed symptoms of alcohol intoxication such as blurred vision, drowsiness, imbalance, mild confusion and diplopia. According to the authors, the dose was 150 mg of docetaxel (ethanol inside amounts to 75 mL of beer) [148]. Although by default, the effects of alcohol are described with an oral dose, and thus, ethanol has a higher effect on the body in an infusion dose. The symptoms of ethanol described above are significantly higher due to its applied amount. Thus, the question remains whether PTX also contributes to the pharmacodynamic effect of ethanol. Other cases of paclitaxel poisoning have not been described. However, the literature describes poisoning by Taxus plants, in which paclitaxel itself is present.
Labossiere et al. carried out an overview of such poisonings in order to map clinical cases of acute yew intoxication and the treatment strategy, finding that the majority of unintentional poisonings were not life-threatening, and for life-threatening intoxications, different treatment strategies were chosen in an effort to target the specifics of this intoxication. These treatment strategies had little demonstrable effect. The documented mortality of intentional intoxications in this study was 42% [20]. After ingestion, taxines (Figure 1) are very quickly absorbed into the bloodstream, also due to the low pH in the stomach, and cause nausea, vomiting, dizziness and abdominal pain 150]. The first symptoms after ingestion begin to appear in 30 min to 1.5 h, while death usually occurs between 1.5 and 24 h [149]. At this time, the concentrations of substances have a toxic effect on the organism. In addition, toxicological analysis is necessary for the later determination of the diagnosis. Dahlqvist et al. observed approximately 30 min after hospital admission that taxine B concentrations decreased from approximately 125 ng/mL (before haemodialysis) to 80 ng/mL 2 h after dialysis [150]. Another clinical case of suicide attempt, when poisoning was analytically proven, describes the concentrations found in the yew. Concentrations (ng/mL) were measured in serum and urine on the day of admission and two days after treatment for PTX (serum 0.52 and <0.016, urine 0.72 and 39.6), cephalomannine (serum <0.012 and <0.012, urine 1.46 and 166.2) and for Baccatine III (serum 2.95 and 0.32, urine 51.6 and 105.3) [151]. Clinical studies of patients who have survived intoxication have distorted laboratory results due to the intensive initial therapy. However, it can be assumed that the concentrations mentioned above could be even higher before the therapy. Therapy of acute symptomatic intoxication and cardiopulmonary resuscitation of patients includes advanced life support, according to the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) guidelines 2021—securing airways, ventilation, circulation by administration of crystalloid solutions, catecholamines, calcium, administration of antidote for digoxin intoxication for its described possible positive effect on taxane intoxication, administration of activated charcoal to the GIT via a nasogastric tube to reduce further resorption of toxins, treatment of arrhythmias with amiodarone or lidocaine, magnesium, cardioversion—but their effectiveness is low [152,153]. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation is started immediately when electromechanical dissociation occurs, and if veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) is available, it can be used for the therapy of a refractory shock. [151,154,155]. Due to the large volume of distribution, large molecular weight of taxins and high binding to proteins, the effectiveness of haemodialysis as an elimination method for the treatment of intoxication is unlikely [150], but it can be used to treat or stabilise the disruption of the acid–base and mineral balance [20].
The mechanism of the acute toxic effect on the organism is caused by the alkaloids taxine A, taxine B, isotaxine B, paclitaxel (taxol A), taxol B and taxicatin glycosite. Taxine A, but especially taxine B, binds to the sodium and calcium channels of cardiomyocytes and causes their blockade [150]. Blockage of sodium and calcium channels leads to impairment of the conduction system of the heart, reduction of excitability and conduction velocity, which causes the ineffectiveness of external cardiac stimulation or drug stimulation of the myocardium [154,156]. Taxines as antagonists of calcium channels of cardiomyocytes have a similar effect on the myocardium as antiarrhythmic drugs of group IV calcium blockers, while the cardioselectivity of taxines is higher than that of verapamil [157]. This mechanism of action also explains the very low effectiveness of administered Atropine in the treatment of bradycardia caused by intoxication and the low effectiveness of catecholamines for vasodilation [20]. The toxic effect is subsequently manifested by cardiovascular instability: a negative inotropic, chromotropic and dromotropic effect, at the same time, a highly proarrhythmogenic effect (disappearance of the P wave, AV blockade, prolongation of the QT interval, readiness of the myocardium for malignant rhythm disorder) and vasodilation up to vasoplegia [158]. Other manifestations of intoxication are nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, disturbances of consciousness, and convulsions. Clinically, intoxication is manifested by impaired consciousness, bradycardia (especially at the beginning), hypotension, cyanosis, and mydriasis, followed by bizarre tachyarrhythmias and dyspnoea, which can subsequently result in circulatory arrest and death. There is no causal therapy for intoxication [158].
4.2. Lethal Intoxications
Table 4 contains all (except one) published fatal plant intoxication by Taxus, including three previously unpublished cases. In total, it includes 38 fatal cases of Taxus poisoning, 19 males and 19 females. The average age of men and women was the same—29.7 years. Age ranged from 16 to 70 years, in both cases women. As for the usage form of the Taxus plant, in 27 cases, the needles of the plant alone were used, in 4 cases a decoction/tea from needles, in 5 cases needles in combination with a decoction, and in 1 case the bark was used. In 22 cases of fatal poisoning, it was suicide, in one case accidental intoxication, and in the remaining 15 cases, the manner of death was not stated. Medical history of psychiatric illness occurred in 14 cases, the most common being depression with suicidal thoughts. In 3 cases, no autopsy was performed, and in another 4 cases, no record of autopsy was given in the publication. Autopsy was performed in the remaining 31 cases.
Table 4.
Fatal cases of poisoning by Taxus spp.
Autopsy examination and findings in acute yew poisoning are mostly unremarkable. At the autopsy, only non-specific symptoms are detected—significant acute congestion of the internal organs, especially the lungs, liver, kidneys and brain, acute dilation of the heart cavities, and swelling of the brain and lungs, often with bleeding into the lung alveoli. Microscopic findings are also nonspecific. Thus far, no specific morphological autopsy or histological findings on body tissues and organs have been recorded in the professional literature, which would indicate or prove yew intoxication. An autopsy finding that points to possible yew intoxication is the evidence of yew plant parts—most often typical needles (whole, chopped, crushed) in the digestive tract (especially in the contents of the stomach, duodenum and small intestine). Thus, fatal yew intoxication can be detected by evidence of needle-like leaves or their fragments in the body (digestive tract) and toxicological analysis (evidence of taxanes), which is decisive for determining the cause of death. If needles or their fragments are not found in the body, or autopsy is not performable, the only evidence of yew intoxication remains a toxicological analysis to detect the presence of taxanes in the stomach contents or in the blood or other biological materials. The concentrations of these substances found in cases of fatal taxus poisoning depend on the amount, part (leaves, bark, berries) as well as the form (e.g., whole leaves, cut leaves, crushed leaves, leaf mash, decoction) of the ingested parts of the Taxus plant (Table 2). In the table containing 38 cases of fatal yew intoxication, toxicological analysis was performed in 23 cases (60.5%). The disadvantage was that not all of them carried out a quantitative analysis. The concentration range for taxine B (sometimes quantified together with isotaxine) in blood was from 150 to 80,900 ng/mL, in gastric contents from 2000 to 40,500 µg/mL. PTX concentrations in blood were less than 0.5 ng/mL, the concentration range for PTX in gastric contents was 20–82 ng/mL and in bile 24–800 ng/mL. The concentration range of 3,5-DMP (Figure 1) was in heart blood 31-820 ng/mL, in femoral blood 29–283 ng/mL, in urine 56–8700 ng/mL, in liver 161-918 ng/g, in the kidneys 275–418 ng/g, in the brain up to 35 ng/g, in bile 50–250 ng/mL, in the stomach contents 150–118,000 ng/mL, and in the duodenum 7800 ng/mL. As for other substances, the higher concentrations of 10-DAT (325–4900 ng/mL), BAC III (6.2–292 ng/mL), 10-DAB III (290–1690 ng/mL) and CEPH (37–482 ng/mL) found in bile were collected post mortem. The mentioned substances do not have a uniform distribution in the organism, but in order to determine the trend, it would be necessary to analyse the concentration in all cases of poisoning by the Taxus plant. Moreover, the concentrations can be helpful in the diagnosis of clinical poisonings or in post-mortem diagnosis.
The immediate cause of death is most often heart failure due to fatal cardiac arrhythmia. In all three cases (100%) of fatal yew intoxication published by us, pronounced mydriasis was found at autopsy. In the other 35 cases from the table, mydriasis was present in only five cases (14.3%). The observed differences can be explained either by not recording this clinical symptom, or by its absence in cases of fatal yew intoxication. Mydriasis, however, was observed in some clinical poisonings. In six cases from the table, the net weight of plant parts, needles found during dissection in the digestive tract, which ranged from 3.6 g to 200 g, is given. According to literature data, lethal oral doses of yew needles in humans are in the range of 0.6–1.3 g/kg of body weight [168]. If we assume that 1 g of yew leaves contains approximately 5 mg of taxines, the minimum toxic dose for humans is then calculated at 3.0–6.5 mg of taxines/kg of body weight. In one fatal case of yew intoxication (Case 1) described by us, 35 g of ground (crushed) and whole yew needles was found in the small intestine of a 64 kg man (for whom the lethal amount is 38.4–83.2 g of ingested yew leaves). This represents a fatal dose for the man, taking into account that the man vomited needles and a larger amount of needles was sucked out of his stomach at the hospital (about 1.5 h after being found).
Thus far, serious intoxications due to the ingestion of drugs with Taxol as the active substance used for the treatment of cancer diseases have not been described in the scientific literature. On the other hand, poisonous yews are commonly found freely accessible in parks, gardens, orchards or cemeteries. This makes them potentially dangerous, and one must be vigilant, as even accidental ingestion of a Taxus part can lead to severe intoxication or even death. In addition, scientific publications describing the synergistic effect of paclitaxel due to co-administration with the extract of the Taxus spp. plant are beginning to appear in the literature.
5. Conclusions and Future Perspectives
The most frequently used analytical methods were liquid chromatography with various detectors, and the highest concentration range for paclitaxel, BAC III, 10-DAP, 10-DAB III, 7-E-10-DAP and CEPH was observed in woody parts. The most studied plants were T. cuspidata, T. chinesis and T. baccata.
We summarized the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters such as Cmax, Tmax, CL and AUC for different PTX formulations. However, there is still a need for more studies of PK parameters for these formulations in other ethnic groups and in geriatric patients as well as PK parameters for the newly developing co-administration of taxane extracts and PTX. Even despite premedication, there is still a predominantly organ-oriented toxicity during PTX administration, which could be better correlated not only with the dose but also with monitoring of the therapeutic level by fast and sensitive methods. At the same time, these would also be useful in the diagnosis of ever-present intoxications (often fatal) by Taxus spp. The already mentioned co-administration of PTX with Taxus spp. plant extracts brings the risk of intoxication, and for that reason, we have summarized the fatal intoxications with their medical history, clinical symptoms and autopsy findings, where apart from the characteristic mydriasis, no clear specific diagnostic sign was observed.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, Ľ.N.; writing—original draft preparation, Ľ.N., D.O., Ž.N., R.K., A.H.S., M.M. and A.S.; writing—review and editing, Ľ.N. and Ž.N.; supervision, Ľ.N. and Ž.N.; funding acquisition, Ľ.N. and M.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Acknowledgments
Part of this work was supported by the Health Care Surveillance Authority, Bratislava, Slovak Grant Agency for Science VEGA 1/0790/21, Slovak Research and Development Agency (APVV-17-0318) and by the Slovak Grant Agency for Science (VEGA 1/0116/22). We would like to give thanks to Jaroslav Blaško for chemical structures preparation.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Bhuju, S.; Gauchan, D.P. Taxus wallichiana (Zucc.), an Endangered Anti-Cancerous Plant: A Review. Int. J. Res. 2018, 5, 10–21. [Google Scholar]
- Malik, S.; Cusidó, R.M.; Mirjalili, M.H.; Moyano, E.; Palazón, J.; Bonfill, M. Production of the anticancer drug taxol in Taxus baccata suspension cultures: A review. Process Biochem. 2011, 46, 23–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Glowniak, K.; Mroczek, T.; Zobel, A.M. Seasonal changes in the concentrations of four taxoids in Taxus baccata L. during the autumn-spring period. Phytomedicine 1999, 6, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gallego-Jara, J.; Lozano-Terol, G.; Sola-Martínez, R.A.; Cánovas-Díaz, M.; de Diego Puente, T. A Compressive Review about Taxol®: History and Future Challenges. Molecules 2020, 25, 5986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, T.; Tu, L.; Wang, G.; Qi, N.; Wu, W.; Zhang, W.; Feng, J. Multi-functional chitosan polymeric micelles as oral paclitaxel delivery systems for enhanced bioavailability and anti-tumor efficacy. Int. J. Pharm. 2020, 578, 119105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Luo, Z.; Zhan, R.; Xu, H.; Chen, W.; Huang, H. Synthesis, biological evaluation and low-toxic formulation development of glycosylated paclitaxel prodrugs. Molecules 2018, 23, 3211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, H.; Huang, S.; Wang, H.; Chen, X.; Zhang, H.; Xu, Y.; Fan, W.; Pan, Y.; Wen, Q.; Lin, Z.; et al. Preparation and characterization of paclitaxel palmitate albumin nanoparticles with high loading efficacy: An in vitro and in vivo anti-tumor study in mouse models. Drug Deliv. 2021, 28, 1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.; Shen, M.; Liao, H.; Guo, Q.; Fu, H.; Yu, J.; Duan, Y. A paclitaxel and microRNA-124 coloaded stepped cleavable nanosystem against triple negative breast cancer. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2021, 19, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liao, W.S.; Ho, Y.; Lin, Y.W.; Naveen Raj, E.; Liu, K.K.; Chen, C.; Zhou, X.Z.; Lu, K.P.; Chao, J.I. Targeting EGFR of triple-negative breast cancer enhances the therapeutic efficacy of paclitaxel- and cetuximab-conjugated nanodiamond nanocomposite. Acta Biomater. 2019, 86, 395–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, F.; Zhang, H.; He, M.; Liao, J.; Chen, N.; Li, Y.; Zhou, S.; Palmisano, M.; Yu, A.; Pai, M.P.; et al. Different Nanoformulations Alter the Tissue Distribution of Paclitaxel, Which Aligns with Reported Distinct Efficacy and Safety Profiles. Mol. Pharm. 2018, 15, 4505–4516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Lv, J.; Wang, L.; Shao, H. Comparison of Pharmacokinetics and Biodistribution of 10-Deacetylbaccatin III after Oral Administration as Pure Compound or in Taxus chinensis Extract: A Pilot Study. Planta Med. 2016, 82, 230–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Das, T.; Anand, U.; Pandey, S.K.; Ashby, C.R.; Assaraf, Y.G.; Chen, Z.S.; Dey, A. Therapeutic strategies to overcome taxane resistance in cancer. Drug Resist. Updates 2021, 55, 100754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nižnanský, L.; Nižnanská, Ž.; Kuruc, R.; Szórádová, A.; Šikuta, J.; Zummerová, A. Ayahuasca as a Decoction Applied to Human: Analytical Methods, Pharmacology and Potential Toxic Effects. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhao, Q.; Luan, X.; Zheng, M.; Tian, X.H.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, W.D.; Ma, B.L. Synergistic mechanisms of constituents in herbal extracts during intestinal absorption: Focus on natural occurring nanoparticles. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Škubník, J.; Pavlíčková, V.; Ruml, T.; Rimpelová, S. Current Perspectives on Taxanes: Focus on Their Bioactivity, Delivery and Combination Therapy. Plants 2021, 10, 569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, D.; Jin, J.; Bi, H.; Zhong, G.; Zhou, M.; Guo, J.; Cai, Y.; Liang, M.; Gu, Q.; Hu, Z.; et al. Paclitaxel-Containing Extract Exerts Anti-Cancer Activity through Oral Administration in A549-Xenografted BALB/C Nude Mice: Synergistic Effect between Paclitaxel and Flavonoids or Lignoids. Evid.-Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2022, 2022, 3648175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; Zheng, X.; Lv, J.; Zhou, X.; Wang, Q.; Wen, X.; Liu, H.; Jiang, J.; Wang, L. Pharmacokinetic synergy from the taxane extract of Taxus chinensis improves the bioavailability of paclitaxel. Phytomedicine 2015, 22, 573–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bekhouche, M.; Benyammi, R.; Slaoui, M.K.; Krimat, S.; Paris, C.; Khelifi, L.; Morsli, A. Flavonoid profile and antioxidant properties of Algerian common yew (Taxus baccata L.). Clin. Phytosci. 2022, 8, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Upreti, S.; Pandey, S.C.; Bisht, I.; Samant, M. Evaluation of the target-specific therapeutic potential of herbal compounds for the treatment of cancer. Mol. Divers. 2022, 26, 1823–1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Labossiere, A.W.; Thompson, D.F. Clinical Toxicology of Yew Poisoning. Ann. Pharmacother. 2018, 52, 591–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jamloki, A.; Trivedi, V.L.; Nautiyal, M.C.; Semwal, P.; Cruz-Martins, N. Poisonous Plants of the Indian Himalaya: An Overview. Metabolites 2022, 12, 540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Reijnen, G.; Bethlehem, C.; van Remmen, J.M.B.L.; Smit, H.J.M.; van Luin, M.; Reijnders, U.J.L. Post-mortem findings in 22 fatal Taxus baccata intoxications and a possible solution to its detection. J. Forensic Leg. Med. 2017, 52, 56–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhou, T.; Luo, X.; Zhang, C.; Xu, X.; Yu, C.; Jiang, Z.; Zhang, L.; Yuan, H.; Zheng, B.; Pi, E.; et al. Comparative metabolomic analysis reveals the variations in taxoids and flavonoids among three Taxus species. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Parmar, V.S.; Jha, A.; Bisht, K.S.; Taneja, P.; Singh, S.K.; Kumar, A.; Denmarkpp; Jain, R.; Olsen, C.E. Review Article Number 138: Constituents of the yew trees. Phytochemistry 1999, 50, 1267–1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Van Rozendaal, E.L.M.; Lelyveld, G.P.; van Beek, T.A. Screening of the needles of different yew species and cultivars for paclitaxel and related taxoids. Phytochemistry 2000, 53, 383–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Seasonal Variation of Neutral and Basic Taxoid Contents in Shoots of European Yew (Taxus baccata). Available online: https://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=US201302947451 (accessed on 3 November 2022).
- Wang, X.; Huang, Y.; Mort, A.J.; Zeng, Y.; Tauer, C.G.; Cochran, K.D. Variation of taxane content in needles of Taxus x media cultivars with different growth characteristics. Z. Naturforsch. C. 2006, 61, 619–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tabaszewska, M.; Antoniewska, A.; Rutkowska, J.; Skoczylas, Ł.; Słupski, J.; Skoczeń-Słupska, R. Bioactive components, volatile profile and in vitro antioxidative properties of Taxus baccata L. Red arils. Molecules 2021, 26, 4474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, Z.; Chen, J.T.; Jiang, S.C.; Liu, Z.; Ge, S.B.; Zhang, Z. Chemical components and functions of Taxus chinensis extract. J. King Saud Univ.–Sci. 2020, 32, 1562–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, Q.; Yin, C.W. Chemical Composition of Essential Oils from the Stems of Taxus chinensis var. mairei. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2019, 22, 1144–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, S.; Lu, X.; Zheng, T.; Guo, X.; Chen, Q.; Tang, Z. Investigation of bioactivities of Taxus chinensis, Taxus cuspidata, and Taxus × media by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Open Life Sci. 2021, 16, 287–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huong, L.T.; Thuong, N.T.H.; Chac, L.D.; Dai, D.N.; Ogunwande, I.A. Antimicrobial Activity and Chemical Constituents of Essential Oils from the Leaf and Wood of Taxus chinensis (Rehder & E.H. Wilson) Rehder (Taxaceae) from Vietnam. J. Biol. Act. Prod. Nat. 2020, 10, 8–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bekhouche, M.; Benyammi, R.; Slaoui, M.K.; Khelifi, L.; Morsli, A. Free Radical Scavenging Activity and Detailed Flavonoid Profiling of Algerian Yew (Taxus baccata L.) by LC–ESI–MS/MS. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2020, 12, 2613–2619. [Google Scholar]
- Shao, F.; Zhang, L.; Guo, J.; Liu, X.; Ma, W.; Wilson, I.W.; Qiu, D. A comparative metabolomics analysis of the components of heartwood and sapwood in Taxus chinensis (Pilger) Rehd. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 17647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kayan, B.; Gizir, A.M.; Kalderis, D. Ultrasonic-assisted extraction of 10-deacetylbaccatin III from Taxus baccata L.: Optimization using response surface methodology. J. Iran. Chem. Soc. 2020, 18, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dalmaris, E.; Avramidou, E.V.; Xanthopoulou, A.; Aravanopoulos, F.A. Dataset of Targeted Metabolite Analysis for Five Taxanes of Hellenic Taxus baccata L. Populations. Data 2020, 5, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dalmaris, E.; Sarrou, E.; Multari, S.; Xanthopoulou, A.; Avramidou, E.; Mansuero, D.; Martens, S.; Aravanopoulos, F. Targeted LC-MS/MS analysis for the quantification of taxanes: Assessment of chemodiversity in different European yew (Taxus baccata) populations from Greece. Planta Med. 2019, 85, 1467–1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tabaszewska, M.; Rutkowska, J.; Skoczylas, Ł.; Słupski, J.; Antoniewska, A.; Smoleń, S.; Łukasiewicz, M.; Baranowski, D.; Duda, I.; Pietsch, J. Red arils of Taxus baccata L.—A new source of valuable fatty acids and nutrients. Molecules 2021, 26, 723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, C.; Zhan, X.; Zhang, C.; Xu, X.; Huang, J.; Feng, S.; Shen, C.; Wang, H. Comparative metabolomic analyses revealed the differential accumulation of taxoids, flavonoids and hormones among six Taxaceae trees. Sci. Hortic. 2021, 285, 110196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.F.; Shi, Q.W.; Dong, M.; Kiyota, H.; Gu, Y.C.; Cong, B. Natural taxanes: Developments since 1828. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 7652–7709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, P.; Zhang, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Xiong, J.; Wang, F.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, C. Extraction, Purification, and Biological Activities of Polysaccharides from Branches and Leaves of Taxus cuspidata S. et Z. Molecules 2019, 24, 2926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, C.; Luo, X.; Zhan, X.; Hao, J.; Zhang, L.; Song, Y.B.L.; Shen, C.; Dong, M. Comparative metabolomics reveals the metabolic variations between two endangered Taxus species (T. fuana and T. yunnanensis) in the Himalayas. BMC Plant Biol. 2018, 18, 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mubeen, S.; Li, Z.L.; Huang, Q.M.; He, C.T.; Yang, Z.Y. Comparative Transcriptome Analysis Revealed the Tissue-Specific Accumulations of Taxanes among Three Experimental Lines of Taxus yunnanensis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 10410–10420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Elansary, H.O.; Szopa, A.; Kubica, P.; Al-Mana, F.A.; Mahmoud, E.A.; Ali Zin El-Abedin, T.K.; Mattar, M.A.; Ekiert, H. Phenolic Compounds of Catalpa speciosa, Taxus cuspidate, and Magnolia acuminata have Antioxidant and Anticancer Activity. Molecules 2019, 24, 412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhao, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Meng, H.; Li, W.; Wang, S. Identification and Optimization of a Novel Taxanes Extraction Process from Taxus cuspidata Needles by High-Intensity Pulsed Electric Field. Molecules 2022, 27, 3010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Meng, A.P.; Li, J.; Pu, S.B. Chemical Constituents of Leaves of Taxus chinensis. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2018, 54, 841–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schex, R.; Lieb, V.M.; Schäfer, C.; Schweiggert, R.; Steingass, C.B. Carotenoid profiles of red- and yellow-colored arils of cultivars of Taxus baccata L. and Taxus × media Rehder. Phytochemistry 2021, 186, 112741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siegle, L.; Pietsch, J. Taxus ingredients in the red arils of Taxus baccata L. determined by HPLC-MS/MS. Phytochem. Anal. 2018, 29, 446–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Li, W.; Tang, Y.; Meng, H.; Wang, S. Separation and Purification of Taxanes from Crude Taxus cuspidata Extract by Antisolvent Recrystallization Method. Separations 2022, 9, 304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adhikari, P.; Joshi, K.; Singh, M.; Pandey, A. Influence of altitude on secondary metabolites, antioxidants, and antimicrobial activities of Himalayan yew (Taxus wallichiana). Plant Biosyst.–Int. J. Deal. All Asp. Plant Biol. 2020, 156, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghaffar, N.; Lee, L.S.; Choi, Y.J.; Perre, C.; Khan, B. Efficient Heated Ultrasound Assisted Extraction and Clean-Up Method for Quantifying Paclitaxel Concentrations in Taxus wallichiana. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2019, 101, 549–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, X.H.; Wang, L.T.; Chang, Y.H.; An, J.Y.; Zhu, Y.W.; Yang, Q.; Meng, D.; Fu, Y.J. Application of green and recyclable menthol-based hydrophobic deep eutectic solvents aqueous for the extraction of main taxanes from Taxus chinensis needles. J. Mol. Liq. 2021, 326, 114970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, T.; Zhang, F.; Zhuang, W.; Shu, X.; Wang, Z. Metabolic variations of flavonoids in leaves of T. media and T. mairei obtained by UPLC-ESI-MS/MS. Molecules 2019, 24, 3323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nagy, M.; Grančai, D.; Mučaji, P. Farmacognosis, Biogenesis of Natural Substances, 1st ed.; Osveta: Martin, Slovakia, 2011; ISBN 978-80-8063-368-4. [Google Scholar]
- Lange, B.M.; Conner, C.F. Taxanes and taxoids of the genus Taxus—A comprehensive inventory of chemical diversity. Phytochemistry 2021, 190, 112829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jahodář, L. Farmaceuticky Významné Semenné Rastliny; Univerzita Karlova, Nakladatelství Karolinium: Prague, Czech Republic, 2022; ISBN 978-80-246-4952-8. [Google Scholar]
- Mazumder, K.; Aktar, A.; Roy, P.; Biswas, B.; Hossain, M.E.; Sarkar, K.K.; Bachar, S.C.; Ahmed, F.; Monjur-Al-hossain, A.S.M.; Fukase, K. A Review on Mechanistic Insight of Plant Derived Anticancer Bioactive Phytocompounds and Their Structure Activity Relationship. Molecules 2022, 27, 3036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hao, D.-C.; Ge, G.-B.; Wang, P.; Yang, L. Impact of Drug Metabolism/Pharmacokinetics and Their Relevance Upon Taxus-based Drug Development. Curr. Drug Metab. 2018, 19, 930–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matesanz, R.; Rodríguez-Salarichs, J.; Pera, B.; Canales, Á.; Andreu, J.M.; Jiménez-Barbero, J.; Bras, W.; Nogales, A.; Fang, W.S.; Díaz, J.F. Modulation of microtubule interprotofilament interactions by modified taxanes. Biophys. J. 2011, 101, 2970–2980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alves, R.C.; Fernandes, R.P.; Eloy, J.O.; Salgado, H.R.N.; Chorilli, M. Characteristics, Properties and Analytical Methods of Paclitaxel: A Review. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2018, 48, 110–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dörwald, F.Z. Lead Optimization for Medicinal Chemists; Wiley: Weinheim, Germany, 2012; ISBN 978-3-527-33226-7. [Google Scholar]
- Zou, L.; Zhang, Z.; Feng, J.; Ding, W.; Li, Y.; Liang, D.; Xie, T.; Li, F.; Li, Y.; Chen, J.; et al. Paclitaxel-Loaded TPGS2k/Gelatin-Grafted Cyclodextrin/Hyaluronic Acid-Grafted Cyclodextrin Nanoparticles for Oral Bioavailability and Targeting Enhancement. J. Pharm. Sci. 2022, 111, 1776–1784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uslu, B.; Lingeman, H.; Ozkan, S.A.; Palit, M.; Dogan-Topal, B. Analytical Method Development and Validation of Pharmaceutical Analysis Using Chromatographic Techniques. Chromatogr. Res. Int. 2012, 2012, 948129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siddiqui, M.R.; AlOthman, Z.A.; Rahman, N. Analytical techniques in pharmaceutical analysis: A review. Arab. J. Chem. 2017, 10, S1409–S1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vázquez, M.F.B.; Comini, L.R.; Martini, R.E.; Montoya, S.C.N.; Bottini, S.; Cabrera, J.L. Ultrasonic-assisted extraction of anthraquinones from Heterophyllaea pustulata Hook f. (Rubiaceae) using ethanol–water mixtures. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2015, 69, 278–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baloglu, E.; Kingston, D.G.I. The taxane diterpenoids. J. Nat. Prod. 1999, 62, 1448–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gai, Q.Y.; Jiao, J.; Wang, X.; Liu, J.; Fu, Y.J.; Lu, Y.; Wang, Z.Y.; Xu, X.J. Simultaneous determination of taxoids and flavonoids in twigs and leaves of three Taxus species by UHPLC-MS/MS. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2020, 189, 113456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Knossow, M.; Campanacci, V.; Khodja, L.A.; Gigant, B. The Mechanism of Tubulin Assembly into Microtubules: Insights from Structural Studies. iScience 2020, 23, 101511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Caplow, M.; Ruhlen, R.; Shanks, J.; Walker, R.A.; Salmon, E.D. Stabilization of Microtubules by Tubulin-GDP-Pi Subunits. Biochemistry 1989, 28, 8136–8141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jain, K.; Basu, J.; Roy, M.; Yadav, J.; Patil, S.; Athale, C.A. Polymerization kinetics of tubulin from mung seedlings modeled as a competition between nucleation and GTP-hydrolysis rates. Cytoskeleton 2021, 78, 436–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Buey, R.M.; Díaz, J.F.; Andreu, J.M.; O’Brate, A.; Giannakakou, P.; Nicolaou, K.C.; Sasmal, P.K.; Ritzén, A.; Namoto, K. Interaction of epothilone analogs with the paclitaxel binding site: Relationship between binding affinity, microtubule stabilization, and cytotoxicity. Chem. Biol. 2004, 11, 225–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andreu, J.M.; Barasoain, I. The-interaction of baccatin III with the Taxol binding site of microtubules determined by a homogeneous assay with fluorescent taxoid. Biochemistry 2001, 40, 11975–11984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matesanz, R.; Barasoain, I.; Yang, C.G.; Wang, L.; Li, X.; De Ines, C.; Coderch, C.; Gago, F.; Barbero, J.J.; Andreu, J.M.; et al. Optimization of Taxane Binding to Microtubules: Binding Affinity Dissection and Incremental Construction of a High-Affinity Analog of Paclitaxel. Chem. Biol. 2008, 15, 573–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pineda, J.J.; Miller, M.A.; Song, Y.; Kuhn, H.; Mikula, H.; Tallapragada, N.; Weissleder, R.; Mitchison, T.J. Site occupancy calibration of taxane pharmacology in live cells and tissues. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, E11406–E11414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuh, H.-J.; Jang, S.H.; Wientjes, M.G.; Au, J.L.-S. Computational Model of Intracellular Pharmacokinetics of Paclitaxel. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2000, 293, 761–770. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Maloney, S.M.; Hoover, C.A.; Morejon-Lasso, L.V.; Prosperi, J.R. cancers Mechanisms of Taxane Resistance. Cancers 2020, 12, 3323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Posocco, B.; Buzzo, M.; Follegot, A.; Giodini, L.; Sorio, R.; Marangon, E.; Toffoli, G. A new high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the determination of paclitaxel and 6α-hydroxy-paclitaxel in human plasma: Development, validation and application in a clinical pharmacokinetic study. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0193500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, Y.; Liu, J.; Zhang, J.; Wang, L.; Chan, J.; Wang, H.; Jin, Y.; Yu, L.; Grainger, D.W.; Ying, W. A cell-based pharmacokinetics assay for evaluating tubulin-binding drugs. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2014, 11, 479–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stage, T.B.; Bergmann, T.K.; Kroetz, D.L. Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Paclitaxel Monotherapy: An Updated Literature Review. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 2018, 57, 7–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borgå, O.; Lilienberg, E.; Bjermo, H.; Hansson, F.; Heldring, N.; Dediu, R. Pharmacokinetics of Total and Unbound Paclitaxel After Administration of Paclitaxel Micellar or Nab-Paclitaxel: An Open, Randomized, Cross-Over, Explorative Study in Breast Cancer Patients. Adv. Ther. 2019, 36, 2825–2837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roger, O.B.; Helena, H.; Elsa, B.; Nina, L.; Loman, H.N. Maximum Tolerated Dose and Pharmacokinetics of Paclitaxel Micellar in Patients with Recurrent Malignant Solid Tumours: A Dose-Escalation Study. Adv. Ther. 2019, 36, 1150–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Li, W.; Dai, X.; Zhong, D.; Ding, Y.; Chen, X. Bioequivalence of paclitaxel protein-bound particles in patients with breast cancer: Determining total and unbound paclitaxel in plasma by rapid equilibrium dialysis and liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 2019, 13, 1739–1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gardner, E.R.; Dahut, W.L.; Scripture, C.D.; Jones, J.; Aragon-Ching, J.B.; Desai, N.; Hawkins, M.J.; Sparreboom, A.; Figg, W.D. Randomized Crossover Pharmacokinetic Study of Solvent-Based Paclitaxel and nab-Paclitaxel. Clin. Cancer Res. 2008, 14, 4200–4205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Desai, N.; Trieu, V.; Yao, Z.; Louie, L.; Ci, S.; Yang, A.; Tao, C.; De, T.; Beals, B.; Dykes, D.; et al. Increased Antitumor Activity, Intratumor Paclitaxel Concentrations, and Endothelial Cell Transport of Cremophor-Free, Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel, ABI-007, Compared with Cremophor-Based Paclitaxel. Clin. Cancer Res. 2006, 12, 1317–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Eerden, R.A.G.; van Doorn, L.; de Man, F.M.; Heersche, N.; Doukas, M.; van den Bosch, T.P.P.; Oomen-de Hoop, E.; de Bruijn, P.; Bins, S.; Ibrahim, E.; et al. Tissue Type Differences in ABCB1 Expression and Paclitaxel Tissue Pharmacokinetics in Patients with Esophageal Cancer. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 759146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jamis-Dow, C.A.; Klecker, R.W.; Sarosy, G.; Reed, E.; Collins, J.M. Steady-state plasma concentrations and effects of taxol for a 250 mg/m2 dose in combination with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in patients with ovarian cancer. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 1993, 33, 48–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rowinsky, E.K.; Jiroutek, M.; Bonomi, P.; Johnson, D.; Baker, S.D. Paclitaxel steady-state plasma concentration as a determinant of disease outcome and toxicity in lung cancer patients treated with paclitaxel and cisplatin. Clin. Cancer Res. 1999, 5, 767–774. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Hurria, A.; Blanchard, M.S.; Synold, T.W.; Mortimer, J.; Chung, C.T.; Luu, T.; Katheria, V.; Rotter, A.J.; Wong, C.; Choi, A.; et al. Age-Related Changes in Nanoparticle Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics: Influence of Chronological Versus Functional Age. Oncologist 2015, 20, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren, X.; Zhao, B.; Chang, H.; Xiao, M.; Wu, Y.; Liu, Y. Paclitaxel suppresses proliferation and induces apoptosis through regulation of ROS and the AKT/MAPK signaling pathway in canine mammary gland tumor cells. Mol. Med. Rep. 2018, 17, 8289–8299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Mahayri, Z.N.; AlAhmad, M.M.; Ali, B.R. Current opinion on the pharmacogenomics of paclitaxel-induced toxicity. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 2021, 17, 785–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ngoi, N.Y.; Syn, N.L.; Goh, R.M.; Goh, B.C.; Huang, R.Y.J.; Soon, Y.Y.; James, E.; Cook, A.; Clamp, A.; Tan, D.S. Weekly versus tri-weekly paclitaxel with carboplatin for first-line treatment in women with epithelial ovarian cancer. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2022, 2022. 12, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chan, J.K.; Brady, M.F.; Penson, R.T.; Huang, H.; Birrer, M.J.; Walker, J.L.; Disilvestro, P.A.; Rubin, S.C.; Martin, L.P.; Davidson, S.A.; et al. Weekly vs. Every-3-Week Paclitaxel and Carboplatin for Ovarian Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 381, 738–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, H.; Zha, S.; Zhang, W.; Wang, Q.; Jiang, D.; Xu, X.; Zheng, X.; Qiu, M.; Shan, C. A systematic review and meta-analysis of nab-paclitaxel mono-chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. BMC Cancer 2021, 21, 830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chou, P.L.; Huang, Y.P.; Cheng, M.H.; Rau, K.M.; Fang, Y.P. Improvement of paclitaxel-associated adverse reactions (ADRs) via the use of nano-based drug delivery systems: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Int. J. Nanomed. 2020, 15, 1731–1743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marschner, N.; Salat, C.; Söling, U.; Hansen, R.; Grebhardt, S.; Harde, J.; Nusch, A.; Potthoff, K. Final Effectiveness and Safety Results of NABUCCO: Real-World Data from a Noninterventional, Prospective, Multicenter Study in 697 Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer Treated with nab-Paclitaxel. Clin. Breast Cancer 2018, 18, e1323–e1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Guo, Q.; Zhang, H.; Li, X.; Quan, X. Risk Factors for Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Caused by Nanoparticle Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel in Advanced Breast Cancer. Biomed Res. Int. 2022, 2022, 9430952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ashrafizadeh, M.; Zarrabi, A.; Hashemi, F.; Moghadam, E.R.; Hashemi, F.; Entezari, M.; Hushmandi, K.; Mohammadinejad, R.; Najafi, M. Curcumin in cancer therapy: A novel adjunct for combination chemotherapy with paclitaxel and alleviation of its adverse effects. Life Sci. 2020, 256, 117984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Picard, M. Management of Hypersensitivity Reactions to Taxanes. Immunol. Allergy Clin. N. Am. 2017, 37, 679–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- D’Errico, S.; Baldari, B.; Arcangeli, M.; Santurro, A.; Frati, P.; Fineschi, V. Mast cells activation and high blood tryptase levels due to paclitaxel administration. Is Cremophor EL the culprit? A case report. Medicine 2020, 99, e22814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pagani, M.; Bavbek, S.; Alvarez-Cuesta, E.; Berna Dursun, A.; Bonadonna, P.; Castells, M.; Cernadas, J.; Chiriac, A.; Sahar, H.; Madrigal-Burgaleta, R.; et al. Hypersensitivity reactions to chemotherapy: An EAACI Position Paper. Allergy 2022, 77, 388–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Eerden, R.A.G.; Mathijssen, R.H.J.; Koolen, S.L.W. Recent clinical developments of nanomediated drug delivery systems of taxanes for the treatment of cancer. Int. J. Nanomed. 2020, 15, 8151–8166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Altundag, K.; Dede, D.S.; Purnak, T. Albumin-bound paclitaxel (ABI-007; Abraxane) in the management of basal-like breast carcinoma. J. Clin. Pathol. 2007, 60, 958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Otani, I.M.; Lax, T.; Long, A.A.; Slawski, B.R.; Camargo, C.A.; Banerji, A. Utility of Risk Stratification for Paclitaxel Hypersensitivity Reactions. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 2018, 6, 1266–1273.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thangwonglers, T.; Santimaleeworagun, W.; Therasakvichya, S.; Saengsukkasemsak, N.; Pimsi, P. Characteristics of immediate hypersensitivity reaction to paclitaxel-based chemotherapy in gynecologic cancer patients. Asian Pacific J. Allergy Immunol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.S.; Suh, K.J.; Lee, D.W.; Woo, G.U.; Kim, M.; Kim, S.H.; Ryu, H.S.; Lee, K.H.; Kim, T.Y.; Han, S.W.; et al. A Real-world Efficacy of Nab-paclitaxel Monotherapy in Metastatic Breast Cancer. Cancer Res. Treat. 2022, 54, 488–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gornstein, E.L.; Schwarz, T.L. Neurotoxic mechanisms of paclitaxel are local to the distal axon and independent of transport defects. Exp. Neurol. 2017, 288, 153–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dhawan, S.; Andrews, R.; Kumar, L.; Wadhwa, S.; Shukla, G. A Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Effectiveness of Muscle Strengthening and Balancing Exercises on Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathic Pain and Quality of Life among Cancer Patients. Cancer Nurs. 2020, 43, 269–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shigematsu, H.; Hirata, T.; Nishina, M.; Yasui, D.; Ozaki, S. Cryotherapy for the prevention of weekly paclitaxel-induced peripheral adverse events in breast cancer patients. Support. Care Cancer 2020, 28, 5005–5011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cario, E. Toll-like receptors in the pathogenesis of chemotherapy-induced gastrointestinal toxicity. Curr. Opin. Support. Palliat. Care 2016, 10, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mallick, P.; Basu, S.; Moorthy, B.; Ghose, R. Role of Toll-like receptor 4 in Drug-drug Interaction between Paclitaxel and Irinotecan in vitro. Toxicol. In Vitro 2017, 41, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moisan, A.; Michielin, F.; Jacob, W.; Kronenberg, S.; Wilson, S.; Avignon, B.; Gerard, R.; Benmansour, F.; McIntyre, C.; Meneses-Lorente, G.; et al. Mechanistic investigations of diarrhea toxicity induced by Anti-HER2/3 combination therapy. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2018, 17, 1464–1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, E.; Abu-Sbeih, H.; Thirumurthi, S.; Mallepally, N.; Khurana, S.; Wei, D.; Altan, M.; Morris, V.K.; Tan, D.; Barcenas, C.H.; et al. Clinical characteristics of colitis induced by taxane-based chemotherapy. Ann. Gastroenterol. 2020, 33, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morelli, M.B.; Bongiovanni, C.; Da Pra, S.; Miano, C.; Sacchi, F.; Lauriola, M.; D’Uva, G. Cardiotoxicity of Anticancer Drugs: Molecular Mechanisms and Strategies for Cardioprotection. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2022, 9, 680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gergs, U.; Weisgut, J.; Griethe, K.; Mißlinger, N.; Kirchhefer, U.; Neumann, J. Human histamine H2 receptors can initiate cardiac arrhythmias in a transgenic mouse. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch. Pharmacol. 2021, 394, 1963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dermitzakis, E.V.; Kimiskidis, V.K.; Lazaridis, G.; Alexopoulou, Z.; Timotheadou, E.; Papanikolaou, A.; Romanidou, O.; Georgiadis, G.; Kalogeras, K.T.; Tsiptsios, I.; et al. The impact of paclitaxel and carboplatin chemotherapy on the autonomous nervous system of patients with ovarian cancer. BMC Neurol. 2016, 16, 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Florescu, M.; Cinteza, M.; Vinereanu, D. Chemotherapy-induced Cardiotoxicity. Maedica A J. Clin. Med. 2013, 8, 59–67. [Google Scholar]
- Batra, A.; Patel, B.; Addison, D.; Baldassarre, L.A.; Desai, N.; Weintraub, N.; Deswal, A.; Hussain, Z.; Brown, S.A.; Ganatra, S.; et al. Cardiovascular safety profile of taxanes and vinca alkaloids: 30 years FDA registry experience. Open Heart 2021, 8, e001849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bikiewicz, A.; Banach, M.; von Haehling, S.; Maciejewski, M.; Bielecka-Dabrowa, A. Adjuvant breast cancer treatments cardiotoxicity and modern methods of detection and prevention of cardiac complications. ESC Heart Fail. 2021, 8, 2397–2418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lanza, O.; Ferrera, A.; Reale, S.; Solfanelli, G.; Petrungaro, M.; Melato, G.T.; Volpe, M.; Battistoni, A. New Insights on the Toxicity on Heart and Vessels of Breast Cancer Therapies. Med. Sci. 2022, 10, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schlitt, A.; Jordan, K.; Vordermark, D.; Schwamborn, J.; Langer, T.; Thomssen, C. Cardiotoxicity and oncological treatments. Dtsch. Arztebl. Int. 2014, 111, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marupudi, N.I.; Han, J.E.; Li, K.W.; Renard, V.M.; Tyler, B.M.; Brem, H. Paclitaxel: A review of adverse toxicities and novel delivery strategies. Expert Opin. Drug Saf. 2007, 6, 609–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahtani, R.L.; Parisi, M.; Glück, S.; Ni, Q.; Park, S.; Pelletier, C.; Faria, C.; Braiteh, F. Comparative effectiveness of early-line nab-paclitaxel vs. paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer: A US community-based real-world analysis. Cancer Manag. Res. 2018, 10, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anoop, T.M.; Joseph, R.; Unnikrishnan, P.; Thomas, F.; Venugopal, M. Taxane-induced acute interstitial pneumonitis in patients with breast cancer and outcome of taxane rechallenge. Lung India 2022, 39, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fujimoto, D.; Kato, R.; Morimoto, T.; Shimizu, R.; Sato, Y.; Kogo, M.; Ito, J.; Teraoka, S.; Nagata, K.; Nakagawa, A.; et al. Characteristics and Prognostic Impact of Pneumonitis during Systemic Anti-Cancer Therapy in Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0168465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khaled, M.; Kondamudi, N.P. Type IV Hypersensitivity Reaction; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Fujimori, K.; Yokoyama, A.; Kurita, Y.; Uno, K.; Saijo, N. Paclitaxel-induced cell-mediated hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Diagnosis using leukocyte migration test, bronchoalveolar lavage and transbronchial lung biopsy. Oncology 1998, 55, 340–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Njigha, E.; Vuky, J.; Paxton, J.; Palumbo, A. Use of Nanoparticle Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel in Patients with Breast Cancer and Paclitaxel-Induced Pneumonitis: Single-Center Case Series. J. Hematol. Oncol. Pharm. 2019, 9, 199–205. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, W.J.; Zhong, Z.J.; Cao, L.H.; Li, H.T.; Zhang, T.H.; Lin, W.Q. Paclitaxel-induced lung injury and its amelioration by parecoxib sodium. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 12977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Matsuno, O. Drug-induced interstitial lung disease: Mechanisms and best diagnostic approaches. Respir. Res. 2012, 13, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khan, A.; McNally, D.; Tutschka, P.J.; Bilgrami, S. Paclitaxel-Induced Acute Bilateral Pneumonitis. Ann. Pharmacother. 2016, 31, 1471–1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McNeish, I.A.; Kanfer, E.J.; Haynes, R.; Giles, C.; Harland, S.J.; Driver, D.; Rustin, G.J.S.; Newlands, E.S.; Seckl, M.J. Paclitaxel-containing high-dose chemotherapy for relapsed or refractory testicular germ cell tumours. Br. J. Cancer 2004, 90, 1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kashiwada, T.; Saito, Y.; Terasaki, Y.; Hisakane, K.; Takeuchi, S.; Sugano, T.; Miyanaga, A.; Noro, R.; Minegishi, Y.; Seike, M.; et al. Interstitial lung disease associated with nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel treatment in patients with lung cancer. Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol. 2019, 49, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ardolino, L.; Lau, B.; Wilson, I.; Chen, J.; Borella, L.; Stone, E.; Lim, E. Case Report: Paclitaxel-Induced Pneumonitis in Early Breast Cancer: A Single Institution Experience and Review. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 2479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bielopolski, D.; Evron, E.; Moreh-Rahav, O.; Landes, M.; Stemmer, S.M.; Salamon, F. Paclitaxel-induced pneumonitis in patients with breast cancer: Case series and review of the literature. J. Chemother. 2017, 29, 113–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marks, D.H.; Qureshi, A.; Friedman, A. Evaluation of Prevention Interventions for Taxane-Induced Dermatologic Adverse Events: A Systematic Review. JAMA Dermatol. 2018, 154, 1465–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, C.; Gianos, M.; Klaustermeyer, W.B. Diagnosis and management of hypersensitivity reactions related to common cancer chemotherapy agents. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2009, 102, 179–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Perez-Fidalgo, J.A.; Navarro, C.E.; Garcia, C.S.; Perez-Leal, M.; Ferriols, J.P.; Cervantes, A.; Paya, J.M.; Gimeno, J.C. Mechanisms of skin toxicity of paclitaxel: An in vitro preclinical assessment. J. Clin. Oncol. 2020, 38, e15511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jennings, E.; Huang, S.; Lee, J.B.; Cha, J.; Hsu, S. Toxic Erythema of Chemotherapy Secondary to Gemcitabine and Paclitaxel. Dermatol. Online J. 2020, 26, 13030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, M.H.; Chen, G.Y.; Lin, J.H.; Lee, H.H.; Chung, K.C.; Wang, P.H. Paclitaxel-related dermatological problems: Not only alopecia occurs. Taiwan. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2019, 58, 877–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sibaud, V.; Leboeuf, N.R.; Roche, H.; Belum, V.R.; Gladieff, L.; Deslandres, M.; Montastruc, M.; Eche, A.; Vigarios, E.; Dalenc, F.; et al. Dermatological adverse events with taxane chemotherapy. Eur. J. Dermatol. 2016, 26, 427–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chan, J.; Adderley, H.; Alameddine, M.; Armstrong, A.; Arundell, D.; Fox, R.; Harries, M.; Lim, J.; Salih, Z.; Tetlow, C.; et al. Permanent hair loss associated with taxane chemotherapy use in breast cancer: A retrospective survey at two tertiary UK cancer centres. Eur. J. Cancer Care 2021, 30, e13395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lugtenberg, R.T.; van den Hurk, C.J.G.; Smorenburg, C.H.; Mosch, L.; Houtsma, D.; Deursen, M.A.G.D.H.V.; Kaptein, A.A.; Gelderblom, H.; Kroep, J.R. Comparable effectiveness of 45- and 20-min post-infusion scalp cooling time in preventing paclitaxel-induced alopecia—A randomized controlled trial. Support. Care Cancer 2022, 30, 6641–6648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chmielewski, N.N.; Limoli, C.L. Sex Differences in Taxane Toxicities. Cancers 2022, 14, 3325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rabah, S.O. Acute Taxol nephrotoxicity: Histological and ultrastructural studies of mice kidney parenchyma. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2010, 17, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilson, D.B.; Beck, T.M.; Gundlach, C.A. Paclitaxel formulation as a cause of ethanol intoxication. Ann. Pharmacother. 1997, 31, 873–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perry, J.R.; Warner, E. Transient encephalopathy after paclitaxel (Taxol) infusion. Neurology 1996, 46, 1596–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fries, H.; Hitzschke, M.; Lordick, F. A Different Kind of Relapse: Ethanol as an Additive in Chemotherapy Formulations. Oncol. Res. Treat. 2019, 42, 350–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mirza, A.; Mithal, N. Alcohol intoxication with the new formulation of docetaxel. Clin. Oncol. 2011, 23, 560–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pilija, V.; Djurendic-Brenesel, M.; Miletic, S. Fatal poisoning by ingestion of Taxus baccata leaves. Forensic Sci. Int. 2018, 290, e1–e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dahlqvist, M.; Venzin, R.; König, S.; Faber, K.; Weinmann, W.; Terbeck, S.; Ceschi, A.; Dünser, M.W. Haemodialysis in Taxus baccata poisoning: A case report. QJM Int. J. Med. 2012, 105, 359–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vardon Bounes, F.; Tardif, E.; Ruiz, S.; Gallart, J.C.; Conil, J.M.; Delmas, C. Suicide attempt with self-made Taxus baccata leaf capsules: Survival following the application of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for ventricular arrythmia and refractory cardiogenic shock. Clin. Toxicol. 2017, 55, 925–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Farag, M.; Badowski, D.; Koschny, R.; Skopp, G.; Brcic, A.; Szabo, G.B. Extracorporeal life support and digoxin-specific Fab fragments for successful management of Taxus baccata intoxication with low output and ventricular arrhythmia. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2017, 35, 1987.e3–1987.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lott, C.; Truhlář, A.; Alfonzo, A.; Barelli, A.; González-Salvado, V.; Hinkelbein, J.; Nolan, J.P.; Paal, P.; Perkins, G.D.; Thies, K.C.; et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Cardiac arrest in special circumstances. Resuscitation 2021, 161, 152–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thooft, A.; Goubella, A.; Fagnoul, D.; Taccone, F.S.; Brimioulle, S.; Vincent, J.-L.; De Backer, D. Combination of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and hypothermia for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to Taxus intoxication. CJEM 2014, 16, 504–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vališ, M.; Kočí, J.; Tuček, D.; Lutonský, T.; Kopová, J.; Bartoń, P.; Vyšata, O.; Krajíčková, D.; Korábečný, J.; Masopust, J.; et al. Common yew intoxication: A case report. J. Med. Case Rep. 2014, 8, 2–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baum, C.; Bohnen, S.; Sill, B.; Philipp, S.; Damerow, H.; Kluge, S.; Reichenspurner, H.; Blankenberg, S.; Söffker, G.; Barten, M.J.; et al. Prolonged resuscitation and cardiogenic shock after intoxication with European yew (Taxus baccata): Complete recovery after intermittent mechanical circulatory support. Int. J. Cardiol. 2015, 181, 176–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wilson, C.R.; Sauer, J.M.; Hooser, S.B. Taxines: A review of the mechanism and toxicity of yew (Taxus spp.) alkaloids. Toxicon 2001, 39, 175–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fuchs, J.; Rauber-Lüthy, C.; Kupferschmidt, H.; Kupper, J.; Kullak-Ublick, G.A.; Ceschi, A. Acute plant poisoning: Analysis of clinical features and circumstances of exposure. Clin. Toxicol. 2011, 49, 671–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Czerwek, H.; Fischer, W. Tödlicher Vergiftungsfall mit Taxus baccata. Arch. Toxikol. 1960, 18, 88–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Frohne, D.; Pribilla, O. Tödliche Vergiftung mit Taxus baccata. Arch. Toxikol. 1965, 21, 150–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schulte, T. Tödliche Vergiftung mit Eibennadeln (Taxus baccata). Arch. Toxicol. 1975, 34, 153–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yersin, B.; Frey, J.G.; Schaller, M.D.; Nicod, P.; Perret, C. Fatal cardiac arrhythmias and shock following yew leaves ingestion. Ann. Emerg. Med. 1987, 16, 1396–1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sinn, L.E. Fatal Taxine Poisoning from Yew Leaf Ingestion. J. Forensic. Sci. 1991, 36, 599–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Ingen, G.; Visser, R.; Peltenburg, H.; van der Ark, A.M.; Voortman, M. Sudden unexpected death due to Taxus poisoning. A report of five cases, with review of the literature. Forensic Sci. Int. 1992, 56, 81–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mufihoff, F.; Jacob, B.; Fowinkel, C.; Daldrup, T. Suicidal yew leave ingestion—Phloroglucindimethylether (3, 5-dimethoxyphenol) as a marker for poisoning from Taxus baccata. Int. J. Leg. Med. 1993, 106, 45–50. [Google Scholar]
- Beike, J.; Karger, B.; Meiners, T.; Brinkmann, B.; Köhler, H. LC-MS determination of Taxus alkaloids in biological specimens. Int. J. Leg. Med. 2003, 117, 335–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Frommherz, L.; Kintz, P.; Kijewski, H.; Köhler, H.; Lehr, M.; Brinkmann, B.; Beike, J. Quantitative determination of taxine B in body fluids by LC-MS-MS. Int. J. Leg. Med. 2006, 120, 346–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pietsch, J.; Schulz, K.; Schmidt, U.; Andresen, H.; Schwarze, B.; Dreßler, J. A comparative study of five fatal cases of Taxus poisoning. Int. J. Leg. Med. 2007, 121, 417–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Roll, P.; Beham-Schmid, C.; Beham, A.; Kollroser, M.; Reichenpfader, B. Suicidal yew ingestion. Forensic Sci. Int. Suppl. Ser. 2009, 1, 20–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Froldi, R.; Croci, P.F.; Dell’Acqua, L.; Farè, F.; Tassoni, G.; Gambaro, V. Preliminary gas chromatography with mass spectrometry determination of 3,5-dimethoxyphenol in biological specimens as evidence of Taxus poisoning. J. Anal. Toxicol. 2010, 34, 53–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stríbrný, J.; Dogosi, M.; Snupárek, Z.; Toupalík, P.; Baláz, P.; Bartos, P. 3,5-Dimethoxyfenol—Marker Intoxication with Taxus baccata. Soud. Lek. 2010, 55, 36–39. [Google Scholar]
- Grobosch, T.; Schwarze, B.; Stoecklein, D.; Binscheck, T. Fatal poisoning with Taxus baccata. Quantification of paclitaxel (taxol A), 10-deacetyltaxol, baccatin III, 10-deacetylbaccatin III, cephalomannine (taxol B), and 3,5-dimethoxyphenol in body fluids by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J. Anal. Toxicol. 2012, 36, 36–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grobosch, T.; Schwarze, B.; Felgenhauer, N.; Riesselmann, B.; Roscher, S.; Binscheck, T. Eight cases of fatal and non-fatal poisoning with Taxus baccata. Forensic Sci. Int. 2013, 227, 118–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tranca, S.; Petrisor, C.L. A fatal case of Taxus poisoning. Clujul Med. 2013, 86, 279–281. [Google Scholar]
- Perju-Dumbravǎ, D.; Morar, S.; Chiroban, O.; Lechintan, E.; Cioca, A. Suicidal poisoning by ingestion of Taxus baccata leaves. Case report and literature review. Rom. J. Leg. Med. 2013, 21, 115–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piskač, O.; Stříbrný, J.; Rakovcová, H.; Malý, M. Cardiotoxicity of yew. Cor Vasa 2015, 57, e234–e238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arens, A.M.; Anaebere, T.C.; Horng, H.; Olson, K. Fatal Taxus baccata ingestion with perimortem serum taxine B quantification. Clin. Toxicol. 2016, 54, 878–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brooks-Lim, E.W.L.; Mérette, S.A.; Hawkins, B.J.; Maxwell, C.; Washbrook, A.; Shapiro, A.M. Fatal ingestion of Taxus baccata: English yew. J. Forensic Sci. 2022, 67, 820–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alarfaj, M.; Goswami, A. Cardiotoxicity in yew berry poisoning. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2021, 50, 812.e1–812.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
