Next Article in Journal
Altered Blood and Brain Expression of Inflammation and Redox Genes in Alzheimer’s Disease, Common to APPV717I × TAUP301L Mice and Patients
Next Article in Special Issue
Understanding the Underlying Molecular Mechanisms of Meiotic Arrest during In Vitro Spermatogenesis in Rat Prepubertal Testicular Tissue
Previous Article in Journal
Different Cutibacterium acnes Phylotypes Release Distinct Extracellular Vesicles
Previous Article in Special Issue
Controversies in the Pathogenesis, Diagnosis and Treatment of PCOS: Focus on Insulin Resistance, Inflammation, and Hyperandrogenism
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 10
10.3390/ijms23105798
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Proteoglycans: Systems-Level Insight into Their Expression in Healthy and Diseased Placentas

by
Orsolya Oravecz
1,2,
Andrea Balogh
1,
Roberto Romero
3,4,5,6,7,
Yi Xu
3,8,
Kata Juhasz
1,
Zsolt Gelencser
1,
Zhonghui Xu
3,
Gaurav Bhatti
3,8,
Roger Pique-Regi
3,6,8,
Balint Peterfia
1,
Petronella Hupuczi
9,
Ilona Kovalszky
10,
Padma Murthi
11,12,
Adi L. Tarca
3,8,13,
Zoltan Papp
9,
Janos Matko
1 and
Nandor Gabor Than
1,9,10,*
1
Systems Biology of Reproduction Research Group, Institute of Enzymology, Research Centre for Natural Sciences, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary
2
Doctoral School of Biology, Institute of Biology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary
3
Perinatology Research Branch, Division of Obstetrics and Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Division of Intramural Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (NICHD/NIH/DHHS), Bethesda, MD 20892, and Detroit, MI 48201, USA
4
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
5
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
6
Center for Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, USA
7
Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI 48201, USA
8
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, USA
9
Maternity Private Clinic, H-1126 Budapest, Hungary
10
First Department of Pathology and Experimental Cancer Research, Semmelweis University, H-1085 Budapest, Hungary
11
Department of Pharmacology, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia
12
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Royal Women’s Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3502, Australia
13
Department of Computer Science, Wayne State University College of Engineering, Detroit, MI 48202, USA
 
add Show full affiliation list
 
remove Hide full affiliation list
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(10), 5798; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23105798
Submission received: 26 April 2022 / Revised: 14 May 2022 / Accepted: 15 May 2022 / Published: 21 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advance in Reproductive Biology and Related Diseases)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Proteoglycan macromolecules play key roles in several physiological processes (e.g., adhesion, proliferation, migration, invasion, angiogenesis, and apoptosis), all of which are important for placentation and healthy pregnancy. However, their precise roles in human reproduction have not been clarified. To fill this gap, herein, we provide an overview of the proteoglycans’ expression and role in the placenta, in trophoblast development, and in pregnancy complications (pre-eclampsia, fetal growth restriction), highlighting one of the most important members of this family, syndecan-1 (SDC1). Microarray data analysis showed that of 34 placentally expressed proteoglycans, SDC1 production is markedly the highest in the placenta and that SDC1 is the most upregulated gene during trophoblast differentiation into the syncytiotrophoblast. Furthermore, placental transcriptomic data identified dysregulated proteoglycan genes in pre-eclampsia and in fetal growth restriction, including SDC1, which is supported by the lower concentration of syndecan-1 in maternal blood in these syndromes. Overall, our clinical and in vitro studies, data analyses, and literature search pointed out that proteoglycans, as important components of the placenta, may regulate various stages of placental development and participate in the maintenance of a healthy pregnancy. Moreover, syndecan-1 may serve as a useful marker of syncytialization and a prognostic marker of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Further studies are warranted to explore the role of proteoglycans in healthy and complicated pregnancies, which may help in diagnostic or therapeutic developments.

1. Introduction

Proteoglycans are macromolecules consisting of a protein core to which glycosaminoglycan (GAG) side chains are covalently attached [1]. Most proteoglycans are important components of the extracellular matrix; however, some of them are localized to the cell surface, and serglycin is one with intracellular localization [2]. Proteoglycans regulate various cellular functions (e.g., adhesion, proliferation, migration, invasion, angiogenesis, and apoptosis) in several ways, such as by binding cytokines, growth factors, or other components of the extracellular matrix or by modulating the activation of signaling receptors mostly via interaction with GAG chains [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11].
Emerging data at the RNA and protein levels have shown that more than a dozen of the nearly 50 proteoglycan core proteins [1,12] are expressed by the human placenta (Table S1). They are produced by trophoblasts (syndecans, glypican-3) and other placental cell types or decidualized stromal cells (a cell surface chondroitin-sulfate proteoglycan (CD44) and decorin) [6,13]. Placental proteoglycans are reported to be involved in different physiological functions of the placenta, such as maintenance of blood flow by anticoagulation, regulation of trophoblast migration and proliferation, and angiogenic processes as well as the regulation of inflammation [14,15,16,17,18]. Each of these functions is necessary for proper placental development and the maintenance of pregnancy. Indeed, altered placental expression of proteoglycans (e.g., syndecan-1; endocan, glypican-3) was reported in obstetrical syndromes, such as pre-eclampsia [19,20,21], fetal growth restriction [22,23,24], and gestational diabetes mellitus [25,26], pointing to their potential roles in the development of these syndromes. Furthermore, proteoglycan-attached GAGs are critical mediators of differentiation, migration, tissue morphogenesis, and organogenesis during embryonic development since embryos lacking specific GAG-modifying enzymes have distinct developmental defects [27].
Of note, the extremely rapid development of the placenta highly resembles the formation of malignant tumors. Indeed, among the properties shared by placental trophoblast cells and cancer cells are the capabilities to invade healthy tissues, form new vessels, and promote an environment that is protected from the immune system [28]. Since proteoglycans are strongly involved in various processes during tumorigenesis, which was reviewed by several workgroups [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48], they may have similar key roles in these processes during placentation.
However, only a few studies attempted to determine the proteoglycans’ diverse roles in the placenta, and a systematic effort to provide a global view on placental proteoglycans has not been carried out. Therefore, herein we performed a systems-level analysis on proteoglycan expression in the placenta in normal and complicated pregnancies, focusing on syndecan-1 as one of the most important members of the proteoglycan family in the placenta.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Expression of Proteoglycans by the Placenta

To screen for proteoglycan genes expressed by the term placenta, BioGPS microarray data [49,50] were analyzed by two approaches. First, utilizing a threshold of 100 units of microarray fluorescence, 34 of the 48 proteoglycan genes were found to be expressed by the placenta (Figure 1a). The top four genes with the highest signal intensity were syndecan-1 (SDC1), followed by glypican-3 (GPC3)—both found on the surface of the parenchymal cells—decorin (DCN, an extracellular matrix component), and collagen, type XV, alpha 1 (COL15A1, a basal membrane component).
As a second approach, the placental expression for each gene was transformed as a ratio relative to the median expression in other tissues (Figure 1b). Nine proteoglycan genes had at least six times higher expression in the placenta than the median of other tissues. The top three genes—GPC3, SDC1, and COL15A1—had relative expression orders of magnitude: 441-fold, 390-fold, and 198-fold higher expression in the placenta than the median of other tissues, respectively. Among these genes, GPC3 and SDC1 also met an additional criterion, being predominantly expressed in the placenta, previously defined in papers by Than et al. and Szilagyi et al. [51,52]. Of note, a recent plasma proteome study reported the highest (26-fold) increase in the concentrations of glypican-3, amongst proteins with significant change, in the maternal circulation with advancing gestation [53].
To validate BioGPS microarray data, syndecan-1 expression results were quantified by qRT-PCR, using a TaqMan Assay and a human 48-tissue cDNA panel (Figure 1c). SDC1 mRNA expression patterns from the qRT-PCR data were consistent with the microarray data. The highest expression was observed in the placenta, representing an approximately three-fold increase over the second-highest expression in the liver, while it has low expression in other tissues. These data suggest that proteoglycans, including SDC1, are important structural and molecular components of the placenta.

2.2. Expression Changes of Proteoglycans during Syncytiotrophoblast Differentiation

Since one of the most important processes in placental development is the differentiation of cytotrophoblast cells into the syncytiotrophoblast, change in the expression of proteoglycan genes was investigated in an in vitro trophoblast differentiation model system. The basic experiment involved the spontaneous syncytial differentiation of isolated primary cytotrophoblast cells [52]. The gene expression pattern of these cells was measured daily by microarray for seven days. The maximal difference in the expression of proteoglycan genes compared to the baseline day 0 was ascertained. SDC1 showed the highest difference in the course of syncytial trophoblast differentiation with a 10.9-fold increase in expression on day 2 (Figure 2a). Of note, CD44 and transforming growth factor-beta receptor III (TGFBR3) were also upregulated with a 2.1-fold and 2.6-fold increase, respectively, while leprecan-1—also known as prolyl 3-hydroxylase 1 (P3H1)—(3.4-fold) and serglycin (SRGN) (−3.5-fold)—was downregulated. To validate the microarray results, the expression of SDC1 mRNA was measured by qRT-PCR in cell lysates, and the protein level was monitored in cell culture supernatants by ELISA. The maximum mRNA expression of syndecan-1 was detected in the cells on day 2 after seeding with an approximately 120-fold increase in expression (Figure 2b). The protein expression in the supernatant, correspondingly, showed the same time dependence (Figure 2c).
Cuffdiff analysis of RNA-seq data of Azar et al. found that DCN, lumican (LUM), and P3H1 were downregulated in the syncytiotrophoblast, while edgeR analysis of the same dataset revealed the downregulation of collagen type XII alpha 1 chain (COL12A1), P3H1, syndecan-4 (SDC4), and structural maintenance of chromosomes 3 (SMC3) as well as the upregulation of GPC3 [54]. In addition, single-cell RNA-seq data derived from the Human Protein Atlas also supports that the syncytiotrophoblast (isolated from first-trimester placentas) has the highest SDC1 expression compared to other trophoblast types in the placenta (Figure 3a) [55,56]. At term, expression of SDC1 remains the highest in the syncytiotrophoblast, as evidenced by a recent single-cell RNA-seq study searching for single-cell transcriptional signatures of the human placenta in term and preterm parturition (Figure 3b) [57].
At the protein level, syndecan-1 was also primarily detected in the syncytiotrophoblast, a multinucleated cell layer of the human placenta. In the syncytiotrophoblast, syndecan-1 was localized to the cytoplasm and the apical cell surface. Immunohistochemical examinations showed negative staining for other cell types of the placenta, e.g., villous trophoblasts and stromal cells of chorionic villi [4,21]. In a recent publication revealing the pivotal role of the transcriptional co-activator yes-associated protein in trophoblast stemness of the developing human placenta, syndecan-1 was even used as a cell fusion marker [58]. Furthermore, during a healthy pregnancy, serum concentrations of syndecan-1 increase steadily with gestational age, in line with the growing placenta and syncytiotrophoblast volume [59,60,61].

2.3. Expression Changes of Proteoglycans during Extravillous Trophoblast Differentiation

Cytotrophoblast stem cells also differentiate into extravillous trophoblasts [62], which facilitate critical tissue connection in the developing placental-uterine interface. Therefore, two independent datasets from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and ArrayExpress were used for the analysis to identify proteoglycan expression patterns associated with extravillous trophoblast differentiation. In both studies, mRNA signatures of purified villous trophoblasts (poor invasiveness) and extravillous trophoblasts (high invasiveness), isolated from first-trimester human placentas, were compared by using GeneChip analyses [13,63]. We focused on those genes whose expression was found to be altered in the same direction in both datasets and which attained statistical significance at least in one dataset. Four genes, aggrecan (ACAN), biglycan (BGN), GPC3, and heparan sulfate proteoglycan 2 (HSPG2), showed higher expression in extravillous trophoblasts in both datasets (Figure 4).
Upregulated expression of ACAN, BGN, and HSPG2 was also supported by single-cell RNA-seq data relative to other trophoblast cell clusters (Figure 5a–c) retrieved from the Human Protein Atlas [56]. Single-cell RNA-seq data of glypican-4 (GPC4) (Figure 5d) and SDC1 (Figure 3) expression rather supports the microarray study of Apps et al. [13].

2.4. Placental Expression Changes of Proteoglycans in Pre-Eclampsia and Fetal Growth Restriction

As proteoglycans have important anticoagulant properties in vascular endothelial environments, including the uteroplacental circulation, we and others have examined their placental expression in pregnancies complicated by pre-eclampsia [20] or fetal growth restriction [22,23,24], the two clinical entities having a common etiological background, including abnormal uteroplacental circulation and an antiangiogenic state [64,65,66,67,68,69]. In general, only slight alterations in the mRNA expression of different proteoglycan genes were detectable in placental samples derived from women with early-onset pre-eclampsia compared to gestational-age-matched controls, in the study of Than et al. [51] (Figure 6a).
The greatest changes were detected for sparc/osteonectin, cwcv, and kazal-like domains proteoglycan 2 (SPOCK2), SDC1, brevican (BCAN), transforming growth factor-beta receptor III (TGFBR3), versican (VCAN), and agrin (AGRN) with 2.4-, −2.2-, 1.7-, −1.6-, 1.5-, and 1.5-fold changes, respectively (Figure 6a). However, only AGRN and TGFBR3 had a significant change in expression in early-onset pre-eclampsia.
A comprehensive analysis of high-quality RNA-seq data also found TGFBR3 as the most downregulated gene in pre-eclampsia, while SPOCK2, glypican-5 (GPC5), and chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan 4 (CSPG4) were significantly upregulated [71]. In addition, expression changes in the placenta, obtained from women with preterm pre-eclampsia and from healthy controls, were also revealed in a small single-cell RNA-seq study [70]. DCN and SRGN were upregulated in villous cytotrophoblasts; GPC3 and SRGN were downregulated, while DCN, LUM, SDC4, and SMC3 were upregulated in the syncytiotrophoblast; HSPG2 and syndecan-2 (SDC2) were downregulated, and SRGN was upregulated in extravillous trophoblasts (Figure 6b). When comparing the results of these studies, it transpires that gene expression patterns were similar in the bulk placenta to that of the syncytiotrophoblast at the level of some proteoglycans, probably due to their predominant expression in that cell compartment. Herein, we did not perform a meta-analysis since different patient groups, and different basic methods limit the comparability of numerous studies. However, we investigated transcriptomic changes in pre-eclampsia in a recent publication [72].
In the case of fetal growth restriction, four microarray studies [66,73,74,75] and one RNA-seq study [76] were available. Downregulation of SDC1 [74] and upregulation of epiphycan (EPYC) and sparc/osteonectin, cwcv, and kazal-like domains proteoglycan 1 (SPOCK1) [75] could be detected. Furthermore, Whitehead et al. measured circulating placenta-specific genes by microarray in maternal blood at 26–30 weeks’ gestation to identify pregnancies at risk of late-onset fetal growth restriction [77] and found BGN and GPC3 to be upregulated in fetal growth restriction.
At the protein level, the expression of five proteoglycans (decorin, glypican-1, glypican-3, perlecan, syndecan-2) of the nine measured was significantly decreased in the placentas of women with pre-eclampsia compared to gestational-age-matched controls [20]. Regarding perlecan protein levels in the placenta, our study found the same direction of change in late-onset pre-eclampsia, which constitute the majority of cases, while an opposite directional change was observed in early-onset pre-eclampsia [78]. This may reflect the distinct placental pathologies of these clinically different pre-eclampsia subtypes.
Although reduced SDC1 expression was not significant in microarray and single-cell RNA-seq analyses, syndecan-1 expression levels in the placenta, using immunohistochemistry and/or qRT-PCR, were shown to be reduced during pre-eclampsia, as reported by a few publications [19,60,79]. In line with reduced syndecan-1 expression in placentas with pre-eclampsia, serum levels of syndecan-1 were found to be lower in pre-eclamptic patients compared to healthy controls [21,61,80,81]. Only one study found that plasma concentration of syndecan-1 was similar in pre-eclamptic and normotensive pregnant women [82], and one showed significantly elevated serum concentrations of syndecan-1 in women with hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelet count (HELLP) syndrome [59]. Although Szabó et al. found lower maternal serum concentrations of syndecan-1 in women with pre-eclampsia than in healthy controls, their study revealed higher immunostaining intensity of the syncytiotrophoblast brush border membrane in preterm pre-eclampsia and HELLP syndrome, which may be attributable to the redistribution of syndecan-1 from the plasma toward the cell surface in these syndromes [21]. This is interesting in the light that cellular redistribution of placenta-specific glycan-binding proteins, galectins [83,84,85,86], in the syncytiotrophoblast was also observed in placentas of women with preterm pre-eclampsia [87,88,89]. It is possible that such cellular redistribution of placenta-specific glycan and glycan-binding proteins are linked together as a result of the activation of an ischemic-inflammatory disease pathway in the tropohoblast in preterm pre-eclampsia [90,91]. Interestingly, one study found lower syndecan-1 maternal plasma concentrations in pre-eclampsia (but not gestational hypertension) already at the 20th week of gestation, when clinical signs have not yet been developed [60]. This means that biological pathways leading to decreased syndecan-1 levels in the placenta and consequently in the maternal circulation are present in midgestation. Indeed, this is true for the above-mentioned ischemic inflammatory disease pathways, as we demonstrated in a previous study [51]. This also suggests that syndecan-1 measurements in maternal circulation may have predictive or prognostic value for pre-eclamptic pregnancies. However, large longitudinal studies need to investigate this phenomenon.
In the case of fetal growth restriction, the mRNA and protein expression levels of both syndecan-1 and syndecan-2 were significantly decreased in diseased placentas compared to the controls [23]. However, according to Garcha et al., syndecan-1 serum levels, but not placental protein levels, were reduced significantly in pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction [92]. Overall, these partly contrasting data highlight the complexity of the phenomenon, which requires further studies for a deeper understanding of the proteoglycans’ behavior in the placenta in various obstetrical syndromes, which may help diagnostic or therapeutic developments.

2.5. Potential Functional Significance of Syndecan-1 in the Placenta

Microarray data showed that of the proteoglycans expressed in the placenta, SDC1 production is markedly the highest. Moreover, during villous trophoblast differentiation into the syncytiotrophoblast, SDC1 has the highest upregulation among all proteoglycans. Furthermore, SDC1 gene expression (microarray and RNA-seq data), although not always significantly, is found to be downregulated in pre-eclampsia and fetal growth restriction, which corroborates with a significantly lower concentration of syndecan-1 protein in the maternal blood in these obstetrical syndromes. These findings, along with data on the role of syndecan-1 in regulating cytoskeleton remodeling, cell adhesion, growth factor signaling, anchorage-dependent growth, and invasiveness in different cell systems [3,93,94], suggest that it may play important roles in the maternal-fetal interface.
On the fetal side of the placenta, the critical involvement of syndecan-1 in trophoblast syncytialization [58] has been reported by a few studies. Prakash et al. found that syndecan-1 silencing led to a decrease in cell fusion and even human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) production in trophoblast-like BeWo choriocarcinoma cells. Their explanation was that the impairment in the establishment of cell-to-cell contact is essential for the morphological differentiation leading to cell fusion. The possible ways through which syndecans, e.g., syndecan-1, regulate the cellular function may include supporting cell adhesion via the binding of adhesion molecules such as fibronectins, collagens, and thrombospondin [94] or may help to establish feto-maternal communication through binding with growth factors [4]. In addition, syndecans have been found to serve as primary attachment receptors for a disintegrin and metalloproteinase 12 (ADAM12) in various human and mouse carcinoma and fibroblast cell lines [95], but the same stands for other cells as well. In the case of trophoblasts, ADAM12 is able to shed the ectodomain of E-cadherin and potentiate trophoblast fusion [96]. The importance of syndecan-1 has been revealed in the maintenance of intestinal barrier function [97,98]. In this context, Moore et al. found that syncytialization caused a marked change in syndecans, matching observations of placental extracellular matrices. Furthermore, the barrier function of the extracellular matrix, as measured by electric cell-substrate impedance sensing, increased significantly during and after syncytialization [98].
Interestingly, the role of syndecan-1 also emerges in trophoblast invasion in association with ADAM12. ADAM12, upregulated during extravillous trophoblast differentiation, was suggested to exert its promigratory function in extravillous trophoblasts by inducing integrin beta 1-mediated cellular spreading [99]. As syndecans are key receptors for ADAM12, they may support the spreading.
On the maternal side of the placenta, it was demonstrated by the workgroup of Hess that syndecan-1 is involved in the control of apoptosis both in human endometrial epithelial [100] and in stromal cells [101]. SDC1 knockdown in endometrial epithelial cells resulted in the decreased expression of several anti-apoptotic proteins, a cellular inhibitor of apoptosis (cIAP)-1 and -2, X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis (XIAP), survivin, clusterin, heme oxygenase (HO-2), and heat shock proteins HSP27 and -70. Correspondingly, active caspase-3 was increased more severely in knockdown cells after treatment with implantation-related stimuli [100]. In endometrial stromal cells, active caspase-3 was also increased in knockdown cells after treatment with implantation-related stimuli [101]. Pro-apoptotic BCL2-associated agonist of cell death (Bad) and Fas receptor increased in accordance with decidualization, and SDC1 knockdown further increased Bad expression. On the contrary, anti-apoptotic Livin decreased due to decidualization and knockdown of SDC1. Implantation stimuli provoked an increase of abundant proteins in all different cell types (stromal cell, SDC1 knockdown stromal cells, decidualized stromal cells, and decidualized SDC1 knockdown stromal cells) in varying degrees. Bad was upregulated in all four cell types, whereas anti-apoptotic cIAP-1 and XIAP were downregulated only in knockdown cells [101]. Altogether, these findings suggest that syndecan-1 may affect the fine-tuning of apoptosis in the endometrium, regulating the embryo’s invasion depth as a crucial step for regular implantation followed by successful pregnancy [100,101].
Of note, the same workgroup found that SDC1 knockdown led to significant changes in cytokine, chemokine, growth factors, and angiogenic factor (e.g., C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 1 (CXCL1), CXCL8, C-C motif chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)) expression profiles of human endometrial stromal cells [102]. Incubation with IL-1β altered the expression patterns of chemokines and angiogenic factors toward inflammatory-associated molecules and factors involved in extracellular matrix regulation. Therefore, syndecan-1 appears to play an important role as a co-receptor and storage factor for many cytokines, chemokines, growth factors, and angiogenic molecules during the decidualization and implantation period, supporting proper implantation and angiogenesis by regulation of chemokine and angiogenic factor secretion in favor of the implanting embryo (Figure 7) [102].
Of importance, the syndecan-1 ectodomain can be shed by various matrix metalloproteinases in a highly regulated fashion, and soluble syndecan-1 can compete with the intact one for extracellular ligands. The multiple roles of syndecan shedding, including inflammation, wound healing, and tumor progression, were reviewed by Manon-Jensen et al. [104]. It would be important to reveal the regulation of syndecan shedding and functions of shed syndecans in pregnancy as well.

3. Summary and Conclusions

In this review, we aimed to characterize the expression and potential functions of all proteoglycans at the maternal-fetal interface in healthy and diseased pregnancies. Importantly, we detected SDC1 to be primarily expressed by the placenta among all human tissues and primarily in the syncytiotrophoblast within the placenta, where it is localized to the cytoplasm and the apical cell surface, the largest interface between the maternal and fetal compartments. Microarray data showed that of 34 proteoglycans expressed in the placenta, SDC1 production is markedly the highest. Moreover, during villous trophoblast differentiation into the syncytiotrophoblast, SDC1 has the highest upregulation among all proteoglycans. We also analyzed transcriptomic data of the placenta from various obstetrical syndromes and identified SDC1, among other dysregulated proteoglycan genes, in pre-eclampsia and fetal growth restriction. In line with these findings, syndecan-1 concentrations are decreased in the maternal blood in these syndromes, where placental development and malfunction are at the center of the disease. Since syndecan-1 supports proper implantation and angiogenesis by the regulation of chemokine and angiogenic factor secretion in favor of the implanting embryo, it may have a key role in the development of placental dysfunction in obstetrical syndromes, where these functions are severely affected.
In conclusion, proteoglycans are important components of the placenta and regulate various steps of placental development as well as participate in the maintenance of healthy pregnancy. Syndecan-1, with the highest expression among proteoglycans, may serve as a useful marker of syncytialization and may also be a diagnostic/prognostic marker of adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as pre-eclampsia and fetal growth restriction. Further studies are warranted to explore the role of proteoglycans, including syndecan-1, in healthy pregnancies and in pregnancies with adverse outcomes to better characterize molecular signaling pathways and to reveal potential therapeutic targets.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Placental Expression of Proteoglycan Coding Genes

We downloaded the human U133A/GNF1H microarray data on 79 human tissues from the BioGPS database [105]. In the case of absolute mRNA expression, the threshold was set to 100. To demonstrate gene expression in the placenta on a relative scale, in comparison to other kinds of tissues, the relative placental expression was calculated relative to the median Q50 value of all other tissues.
Microarray data of trophoblast differentiation into the syncytiotrophoblast were downloaded from GEO (Acc. No.: GSE130339) [52]. Microarray data of extravillous trophoblast differentiation were downloaded from GEO (Acc. No.: GSE9773) [63] and the ArrayExpress microarray data repository (Acc. No.: E-MTAB-429) [13]. Microarray data of placentas obtained from women with preterm pre-eclampsia with or without HELLP syndrome (n = 12), as well as gestational-age-matched controls (n = 5), were downloaded from GEO (Acc. No.: GSE66273) [51,106].
Single-cell RNA-seq data (pTPM) were downloaded from the Human Protein Atlas [107]. The 19 cell clusters were narrowed down to the 12 trophoblast clusters, excluding fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and Hofbauer cells. The original study was executed by Vento-Tormo et al. [55].

4.2. Isolation of Primary Trophoblasts and Cell Culturing

Placentas (n = 6) were collected prospectively from normal pregnant women at term, delivered by cesarean section, at Hutzel Women’s Hospital of the Detroit Medical Center (Detroit, MI, USA), and were then processed at the Perinatology Research Branch, NICHD/NIH/DHHS, for in vitro trophoblast experiments. For cytotrophoblast isolation, we used the modified method of Kliman et al. [108]. One hundred grams of villous trophoblast were cut from the placenta, then washed with PBS. The placenta pieces were sequentially digested with 60 U/mL Dnase I (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MI, USA) and 0.25% (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) trypsin for 90 min at 37 °C, then the digested cells were filtered through 100 μm Falcon nylon mesh cell strainers (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) and the erythrocytes were lysed using 5 mL NH4Cl solution (Stemcell Technologies, Vancouver, BC, Canada). The cells were then washed and resuspended, layered over 20–50% Percoll gradients, and centrifuged at 1200× g for 20 min. Negative selection was used to collect trophoblast-containing bands and to exclude non-trophoblastic cells, using anti-CD14 (20 μg/mL) and anti-CD9 (20 μg/mL) mouse monoclonal antibodies (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), MACS anti-mouse IgG microbeads, and MS columns (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA, USA). Next, the primary trophoblast cells were plated on a collagen-coated 12-well plate (BD Biosciences) in Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium (IMDM, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and completed with 1% penicillin/streptomycin and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). Primary trophoblasts were kept in IMDM containing 1% penicillin/streptomycin and 5% non-pregnant human serum (SeraCare, Milford, MA, USA) to test the effect of trophoblast differentiation on selected genes’ expression. Every 24 h, the medium was replenished, and all 24 h cells were harvested for total RNA between days 1 and 7.

4.3. Total RNA Isolation, cDNA Generation, and RT-qPCR

Total RNA was isolated from cells in 12-well plates each day with RNeasy Mini Kit and RNase-Free DNase Set (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). RNA concentrations were measured with a NanoDrop1000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Total RNA (500 ng) was reverse-transcribed with SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis Kit (Invitrogen-Thermo Fisher Scientific). TaqMan Assays (Applied Biosystems-Thermo Fisher Scientific) for SDC1 (Hs00896423_m1) and RPLP0 (large ribosomal protein; Endogenous Control; 4326314E) were used for gene expression profiling on an ABI 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems-Thermo Fisher Scientific). All experiments were run in triplicate.

4.4. Human 48-Tissue cDNA Panel Expression Profiling

The same TaqMan Assays for SDC1 and RPLP0 were also used for gene expression profiling on Human Major Tissue qPCR Arrays containing first-strand cDNAs from 48 different pooled tissues (n = 3), OriGene Technologies, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA) on an ABI 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems-Thermo Fisher Scientific). All experiments were run in triplicate.

4.5. Syndecan-1 Immunoassay

Syndecan-1 concentrations in supernatants of primary trophoblast cell cultures (n = 5) were measured with a human syndecan-1 sandwich ELISA Kit (Cell Sciences, Canton, MA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The sensitivity of the assay was <2.56 ng/mL, and the coefficients of intra-assay variation and inter-assay variation were 7.6% and 6.8%, respectively. All experiments were run in triplicate.

4.6. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 5.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Unpaired t-test was used for the analysis of SDC1 expression profiling with the Human Major Tissue qPCR Array. One-Way ANOVA test with Dunnett’s post-hoc test was used for the analysis of qRT-PCR and ELISA results. Results were considered statistically significant at * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms23105798/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.G.T.; methodology, Y.X., Zs.G., Z.X., G.B., B.P., A.L.T. and N.G.T.; validation, O.O., A.B., Y.X., K.J., Zs.G., Z.X., G.B., P.M., A.L.T. and N.G.T.; formal analysis, O.O., A.B., Y.X., K.J., Zs.G., Z.X., G.B., B.P., A.L.T. and N.G.T.; resources, R.R., Z.P. and N.G.T.; data curation, A.B., P.H., I.K., J.M. and N.G.T.; writing—original draft preparation, O.O., A.B., K.J., Zs.G., B.P., J.M., P.M. and N.G.T.; writing—review and editing, all authors; visualization, A.B., Zs.G., Z.X., G.B. and R.P.-R.; supervision, R.R., I.K., Z.P., J.M. and N.G.T.; project administration, N.G.T.; funding acquisition, A.B., R.R. and N.G.T. Current address of B.P. is the Faculty of Information Technology and Bionics, Pázmány Péter Catholic University, Budapest, Hungary. R.R. contributed to this work as part of his official duties as an employee of the United States Federal Government. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded, in part, by the Perinatology Research Branch, Division of Obstetrics and Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Division of Intramural Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, USA Department of Health and Human Services (NICHD/NIH/DHHS); in part, with Federal funds from NICHD/NIH/DHHS under Contract No. HHSN275201300006C (R.R.); by the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (Momentum Grant No LP2014-7/2014 (N.G.T.) and Premium Postdoc_2019-436 Grant (A.B.)); by the Ministry of Innovation and Technology of Hungary from the National Research, Development Innovation Fund financed under the OTKA K124862 (N.G.T.) and FIEK_16-1-2016-0005 (N.G.T.) funding schemes; and by the Hungarian Ministry For National Economy, Grant No VEKOP-2.3.3-15-2017-0014 (N.G.T.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Wayne State University (approval number: #110605MP4F dated 10 March 2006) and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (approval number: OH97-CH-N067, dated 4 December 1997).

Informed Consent Statement

All participants provided written informed consent prior to the collection of samples for research purposes.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank Judit Baunoch, Andor Jelinek, Katalin Karaszi, Szilvia Szabo (Research Centre for Natural Sciences), Po Jen Chiang, Russ Price, Theodore Price, Rona Wang (Perinatology Research Branch), Matthew Hess, Susan Land, Daniel Lott, Tara Reinholz (Wayne State University) for their assistance, and Maureen McGerty (Wayne State University) for her critical reading of the manuscript. We also thank Krisztian Papp for the generation of heatmaps and processing of fetal growth restriction microarray and single-cell RNA-seq data.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Iozzo, R.V.; Schaefer, L. Proteoglycan form and function: A comprehensive nomenclature of proteoglycans. Matrix Biol. 2015, 42, 11–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Niemann, C.U.; Cowland, J.B.; Klausen, P.; Askaa, J.; Calafat, J.; Borregaard, N. Localization of serglycin in human neutrophil granulocytes and their precursors. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2004, 76, 406–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Couchman, J.R.; Woods, A. Syndecans, signaling, and cell adhesion. J. Cell. Biochem. 1996, 61, 578–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jokimaa, V.; Inki, P.; Kujari, H.; Hirvonen, O.; Ekholm, E.; Anttila, L. Expression of syndecan-1 in human placenta and decidua. Placenta 1998, 19, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Crescimanno, C.; Marzioni, D.; Paradinas, F.J.; Schrurs, B.; Muhlhauser, J.; Todros, T.; Newlands, E.; David, G.; Castellucci, M. Expression pattern alterations of syndecans and glypican-1 in normal and pathological trophoblast. J. Pathol. 1999, 189, 600–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Marzioni, D.; Crescimanno, C.; Zaccheo, D.; Coppari, R.; Underhill, C.B.; Castellucci, M. Hyaluronate and CD44 expression patterns in the human placenta throughout pregnancy. Eur. J. Histochem. 2001, 45, 131–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Khan, S.; Blackburn, M.; Mao, D.L.; Huber, R.; Schlessinger, D.; Fant, M. Glypican-3 (GPC3) expression in human placenta: Localization to the differentiated syncytiotrophoblast. Histol. Histopathol. 2001, 16, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Van Sinderen, M.; Cuman, C.; Winship, A.; Menkhorst, E.; Dimitriadis, E. The chrondroitin sulfate proteoglycan (CSPG4) regulates human trophoblast function. Placenta 2013, 34, 907–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Afratis, N.A.; Nikitovic, D.; Multhaupt, H.A.; Theocharis, A.D.; Couchman, J.R.; Karamanos, N.K. Syndecans-key regulators of cell signaling and biological functions. FEBS J. 2017, 284, 27–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Jeyarajah, M.J.; Jaju Bhattad, G.; Kops, B.F.; Renaud, S.J. Syndecan-4 regulates extravillous trophoblast migration by coordinating protein kinase C activation. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 10175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Goryszewska-Szczurek, E.; Baryla, M.; Kaczynski, P.; Waclawik, A. Prokineticin 1-prokineticin receptor 1 signaling in trophoblast promotes embryo implantation and placenta development. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 13715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Halari, C.D.; Zheng, M.; Lala, P.K. Roles of two small leucine-rich proteoglycans decorin and biglycan in pregnancy and pregnancy-associated diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 10584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Apps, R.; Sharkey, A.; Gardner, L.; Male, V.; Trotter, M.; Miller, N.; North, R.; Founds, S.; Moffett, A. Genome-wide expression profile of first trimester villous and extravillous human trophoblast cells. Placenta 2011, 32, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Xu, G.; Guimond, M.J.; Chakraborty, C.; Lala, P.K. Control of proliferation, migration, and invasiveness of human extravillous trophoblast by decorin, a decidual product. Biol. Reprod. 2002, 67, 681–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Ball, M.; Carmody, M.; Wynne, F.; Dockery, P.; Aigner, A.; Cameron, I.; Higgins, J.; Smith, S.D.; Aplin, J.D.; Moore, T. Expression of pleiotrophin and its receptors in human placenta suggests roles in trophoblast life cycle and angiogenesis. Placenta 2009, 30, 649–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lala, N.; Girish, G.V.; Cloutier-Bosworth, A.; Lala, P.K. Mechanisms in decorin regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor-induced human trophoblast migration and acquisition of endothelial phenotype. Biol. Reprod. 2012, 87, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hayashida, K.; Parks, W.C.; Park, P.W. Syndecan-1 shedding facilitates the resolution of neutrophilic inflammation by removing sequestered CXC chemokines. Blood 2009, 114, 3033–3043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Teng, Y.H.; Aquino, R.S.; Park, P.W. Molecular functions of syndecan-1 in disease. Matrix Biol. 2012, 31, 3–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Jokimaa, V.I.; Kujari, H.P.; Ekholm, E.M.; Inki, P.L.; Anttila, L. Placental expression of syndecan 1 is diminished in preeclampsia. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2000, 183, 1495–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chui, A.; Murthi, P.; Brennecke, S.P.; Ignjatovic, V.; Monagle, P.T.; Said, J.M. The expression of placental proteoglycans in pre-eclampsia. Gynecol. Obstet. Investig. 2012, 73, 277–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Szabo, S.; Xu, Y.; Romero, R.; Fule, T.; Karaszi, K.; Bhatti, G.; Varkonyi, T.; Varkonyi, I.; Krenacs, T.; Dong, Z.; et al. Changes of placental syndecan-1 expression in preeclampsia and HELLP syndrome. Virchows Arch. 2013, 463, 445–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Ogawa, M.; Yanoma, S.; Nagashima, Y.; Okamoto, N.; Ishikawa, H.; Haruki, A.; Miyagi, E.; Takahashi, T.; Hirahara, F.; Miyagi, Y. Paradoxical discrepancy between the serum level and the placental intensity of PP5/TFPI-2 in preeclampsia and/or intrauterine growth restriction: Possible interaction and correlation with glypican-3 hold the key. Placenta 2007, 28, 224–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Chui, A.; Zainuddin, N.; Rajaraman, G.; Murthi, P.; Brennecke, S.P.; Ignjatovic, V.; Monagle, P.T.; Said, J.M. Placental syndecan expression is altered in human idiopathic fetal growth restriction. Am. J. Pathol. 2012, 180, 693–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Gunatillake, T.; Chui, A.; Fitzpatrick, E.; Ignjatovic, V.; Monagle, P.; Whitelock, J.; Zanten, D.; Eijsink, J.; Borg, A.; Stevenson, J.; et al. Decreased placental glypican expression is associated with human fetal growth restriction. Placenta 2019, 76, 6–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chen, C.P.; Chang, S.C.; Vivian Yang, W.C. High glucose alters proteoglycan expression and the glycosaminoglycan composition in placentas of women with gestational diabetes mellitus and in cultured trophoblasts. Placenta 2007, 28, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Murthi, P.; van Zanten, D.E.; Eijsink, J.J.; Borg, A.J.; Stevenson, J.L.; Kalionis, B.; Chui, A.K.; Said, J.M.; Brennecke, S.P.; Erwich, J.J. Decorin expression is decreased in first trimester placental tissue from pregnancies with small for gestation age infants at birth. Placenta 2016, 45, 58–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kramer, K.L. Specific sides to multifaceted glycosaminoglycans are observed in embryonic development. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2010, 21, 631–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Costanzo, V.; Bardelli, A.; Siena, S.; Abrignani, S. Exploring the links between cancer and placenta development. Open Biol. 2018, 8, 180081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Sanderson, R.D. Heparan sulfate proteoglycans in invasion and metastasis. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2001, 12, 89–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Timar, J.; Lapis, K.; Dudas, J.; Sebestyen, A.; Kopper, L.; Kovalszky, I. Proteoglycans and tumor progression: Janus-faced molecules with contradictory functions in cancer. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2002, 12, 173–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Edwards, I.J. Proteoglycans in prostate cancer. Nat. Rev. Urol. 2012, 9, 196–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Theocharis, A.D.; Skandalis, S.S.; Neill, T.; Multhaupt, H.A.; Hubo, M.; Frey, H.; Gopal, S.; Gomes, A.; Afratis, N.; Lim, H.C.; et al. Insights into the key roles of proteoglycans in breast cancer biology and translational medicine. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2015, 1855, 276–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Szatmari, T.; Otvos, R.; Hjerpe, A.; Dobra, K. Syndecan-1 in cancer: Implications for cell signaling, differentiation, and prognostication. Dis. Mark. 2015, 2015, 796052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Baghy, K.; Tatrai, P.; Regos, E.; Kovalszky, I. Proteoglycans in liver cancer. World J. Gastroenterol. 2016, 22, 379–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Schaefer, L.; Tredup, C.; Gubbiotti, M.A.; Iozzo, R.V. Proteoglycan neofunctions: Regulation of inflammation and autophagy in cancer biology. FEBS J. 2017, 284, 10–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Tanaka, Y.; Tateishi, R.; Koike, K. Proteoglycans are attractive biomarkers and therapeutictargets in hepatocellular carcinoma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Xu, L.; Tang, L.; Zhang, L. Proteoglycans as miscommunication biomarkers for cancer diagnosis. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 2019, 162, 59–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Rigoglio, N.N.; Rabelo, A.C.S.; Borghesi, J.; de Sa Schiavo Matias, G.; Fratini, P.; Prazeres, P.; Pimentel, C.; Birbrair, A.; Miglino, M.A. The tumor microenvironment: Focus on extracellular matrix. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2020, 1245, 1–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Teixeira, F.; Gotte, M. Involvement of syndecan-1 and heparanase in cancer and inflammation. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2020, 1221, 97–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Reszegi, A.; Horvath, Z.; Feher, H.; Wichmann, B.; Tatrai, P.; Kovalszky, I.; Baghy, K. Protective role of decorin in primary hepatocellular carcinoma. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gubbiotti, M.A.; Buraschi, S.; Kapoor, A.; Iozzo, R.V. Proteoglycan signaling in tumor angiogenesis and endothelial cell autophagy. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2020, 62, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Espinoza-Sanchez, N.A.; Gotte, M. Role of cell surface proteoglycans in cancer immunotherapy. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2020, 62, 48–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Reszegi, A.; Horvath, Z.; Karaszi, K.; Regos, E.; Postnikova, V.; Tatrai, P.; Kiss, A.; Schaff, Z.; Kovalszky, I.; Baghy, K. The protective role of decorin in hepatic metastasis of colorectal carcinoma. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Wei, J.; Hu, M.; Huang, K.; Lin, S.; Du, H. Roles of proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans in cancer development and progression. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. De Pasquale, V.; Pavone, L.M. Heparan sulfate proteoglycan signaling in tumor microenvironment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 6588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hollosi, P.; Vancza, L.; Karaszi, K.; Dobos, K.; Peterfia, B.; Tatrai, E.; Tatrai, P.; Szarvas, T.; Paku, S.; Szilak, L.; et al. Syndecan-1 promotes hepatocyte-like differentiation of hepatoma cells targeting Ets-1 and AP-1. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Li, N.; Spetz, M.R.; Ho, M. The role of glypicans in cancer progression and therapy. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2020, 68, 841–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Vancza, L.; Karaszi, K.; Peterfia, B.; Turiak, L.; Dezso, K.; Sebestyen, A.; Reszegi, A.; Petovari, G.; Kiss, A.; Schaff, Z.; et al. SPOCK1 promotes the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Front. Oncol. 2022, 12, 819883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Su, A.I.; Wiltshire, T.; Batalov, S.; Lapp, H.; Ching, K.A.; Block, D.; Zhang, J.; Soden, R.; Hayakawa, M.; Kreiman, G.; et al. A gene atlas of the mouse and human protein-encoding transcriptomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 6062–6067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Wu, C.; Orozco, C.; Boyer, J.; Leglise, M.; Goodale, J.; Batalov, S.; Hodge, C.L.; Haase, J.; Janes, J.; Huss, J.W., 3rd; et al. BioGPS: An extensible and customizable portal for querying and organizing gene annotation resources. Genome Biol. 2009, 10, R130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Than, N.G.; Romero, R.; Tarca, A.L.; Kekesi, K.A.; Xu, Y.; Xu, Z.; Juhasz, K.; Bhatti, G.; Leavitt, R.J.; Gelencser, Z.; et al. Integrated systems biology approach identifies novel maternal and placental pathways of preeclampsia. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Szilagyi, A.; Gelencser, Z.; Romero, R.; Xu, Y.; Kiraly, P.; Demeter, A.; Palhalmi, J.; Gyorffy, B.A.; Juhasz, K.; Hupuczi, P.; et al. Placenta-specific genes, their regulation during villous trophoblast differentiation and dysregulation in preterm preeclampsia. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Romero, R.; Erez, O.; Maymon, E.; Chaemsaithong, P.; Xu, Z.; Pacora, P.; Chaiworapongsa, T.; Done, B.; Hassan, S.S.; Tarca, A.L. The maternal plasma proteome changes as a function of gestational age in normal pregnancy: A longitudinal study. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2017, 217, 67.e1–67.e21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Azar, C.; Valentine, M.; Trausch-Azar, J.; Druley, T.; Nelson, D.M.; Schwartz, A.L. RNA-Seq identifies genes whose proteins are transformative in the differentiation of cytotrophoblast to syncytiotrophoblast, in human primary villous and BeWo trophoblasts. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 5142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Vento-Tormo, R.; Efremova, M.; Botting, R.A.; Turco, M.Y.; Vento-Tormo, M.; Meyer, K.B.; Park, J.E.; Stephenson, E.; Polanski, K.; Goncalves, A.; et al. Single-cell reconstruction of the early maternal-fetal interface in humans. Nature 2018, 563, 347–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Karlsson, M.; Zhang, C.; Mear, L.; Zhong, W.; Digre, A.; Katona, B.; Sjostedt, E.; Butler, L.; Odeberg, J.; Dusart, P.; et al. A single-cell type transcriptomics map of human tissues. Sci. Adv. 2021, 7, eabh2169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Pique-Regi, R.; Romero, R.; Tarca, A.L.; Sendler, E.D.; Xu, Y.; Garcia-Flores, V.; Leng, Y.; Luca, F.; Hassan, S.S.; Gomez-Lopez, N. Single cell transcriptional signatures of the human placenta in term and preterm parturition. Elife 2019, 8, e52004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Meinhardt, G.; Haider, S.; Kunihs, V.; Saleh, L.; Pollheimer, J.; Fiala, C.; Hetey, S.; Feher, Z.; Szilagyi, A.; Than, N.G.; et al. Pivotal role of the transcriptional co-activator YAP in trophoblast stemness of the developing human placenta. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 13562–13570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hofmann-Kiefer, K.F.; Knabl, J.; Martinoff, N.; Schiessl, B.; Conzen, P.; Rehm, M.; Becker, B.F.; Chappell, D. Increased serum concentrations of circulating glycocalyx components in HELLP syndrome compared to healthy pregnancy: An observational study. Reprod. Sci 2013, 20, 318–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Gandley, R.E.; Althouse, A.; Jeyabalan, A.; Bregand-White, J.M.; McGonigal, S.; Myerski, A.C.; Gallaher, M.; Powers, R.W.; Hubel, C.A. Low soluble syndecan-1 precedes preeclampsia. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0157608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Kuessel, L.; Husslein, H.; Montanari, E.; Kundi, M.; Himmler, G.; Binder, J.; Schiefer, J.; Zeisler, H. Dynamics of soluble syndecan-1 in maternal serum during and after pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia: A nested case control study. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2019, 58, 50–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Pollheimer, J.; Vondra, S.; Baltayeva, J.; Beristain, A.G.; Knofler, M. Regulation of placental extravillous trophoblasts by the maternal uterine environment. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 2597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Bilban, M.; Haslinger, P.; Prast, J.; Klinglmuller, F.; Woelfel, T.; Haider, S.; Sachs, A.; Otterbein, L.E.; Desoye, G.; Hiden, U.; et al. Identification of novel trophoblast invasion-related genes: Heme oxygenase-1 controls motility via peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma. Endocrinology 2009, 150, 1000–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Espinoza, J.; Romero, R.; Mee Kim, Y.; Kusanovic, J.P.; Hassan, S.; Erez, O.; Gotsch, F.; Than, N.G.; Papp, Z.; Jai Kim, C. Normal and abnormal transformation of the spiral arteries during pregnancy. J. Perinat. Med. 2006, 34, 447–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Brosens, I.; Pijnenborg, R.; Vercruysse, L.; Romero, R. The “Great Obstetrical Syndromes” are associated with disorders of deep placentation. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2011, 204, 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Nishizawa, H.; Ota, S.; Suzuki, M.; Kato, T.; Sekiya, T.; Kurahashi, H.; Udagawa, Y. Comparative gene expression profiling of placentas from patients with severe pre-eclampsia and unexplained fetal growth restriction. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2011, 9, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Chaiworapongsa, T.; Chaemsaithong, P.; Yeo, L.; Romero, R. Pre-eclampsia part 1: Current understanding of its pathophysiology. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2014, 10, 466–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Szalai, G.; Xu, Y.; Romero, R.; Chaiworapongsa, T.; Xu, Z.; Chiang, P.J.; Ahn, H.; Sundell, B.; Plazyo, O.; Jiang, Y.; et al. In vivo experiments reveal the good, the bad and the ugly faces of sFlt-1 in pregnancy. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e110867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Szalai, G.; Romero, R.; Chaiworapongsa, T.; Xu, Y.; Wang, B.; Ahn, H.; Xu, Z.; Chiang, P.J.; Sundell, B.; Wang, R.; et al. Full-length human placental sFlt-1-e15a isoform induces distinct maternal phenotypes of preeclampsia in mice. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0119547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Zhang, T.; Bian, Q.; Chen, Y.; Wang, X.; Yu, S.; Liu, S.; Ji, P.; Li, L.; Shrestha, M.; Dong, S.; et al. Dissecting human trophoblast cell transcriptional heterogeneity in preeclampsia using single-cell RNA sequencing. Mol. Genet. Genom. Med. 2021, 9, e1730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Gong, S.; Gaccioli, F.; Dopierala, J.; Sovio, U.; Cook, E.; Volders, P.J.; Martens, L.; Kirk, P.D.W.; Richardson, S.; Smith, G.C.S.; et al. The RNA landscape of the human placenta in health and disease. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 2639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Than, N.G.; Posta, M.; Gyorffy, D.; Orosz, L.; Orosz, G.; Rossi, S.W.; Ambrus-Aikelin, G.; Szilagyi, A.; Nagy, S.; Hupuczi, P.; et al. Early pathways, biomarkers, and four distinct molecular subclasses of preeclampsia: The intersection of clinical, pathological, and high-dimensional biology studies. Placenta 2022, in press. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Sitras, V.; Paulssen, R.; Leirvik, J.; Vartun, A.; Acharya, G. Placental gene expression profile in intrauterine growth restriction due to placental insufficiency. Reprod. Sci. 2009, 16, 701–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Guo, L.; Tsai, S.Q.; Hardison, N.E.; James, A.H.; Motsinger-Reif, A.A.; Thames, B.; Stone, E.A.; Deng, C.; Piedrahita, J.A. Differentially expressed microRNAs and affected biological pathways revealed by modulated modularity clustering (MMC) analysis of human preeclamptic and IUGR placentas. Placenta 2013, 34, 599–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Medina-Bastidas, D.; Guzman-Huerta, M.; Borboa-Olivares, H.; Ruiz-Cruz, C.; Parra-Hernandez, S.; Flores-Pliego, A.; Salido-Guadarrama, I.; Camargo-Marin, L.; Arambula-Meraz, E.; Estrada-Gutierrez, G. Placental microarray profiling reveals common mRNA and lncRNA expression patterns in preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Majewska, M.; Lipka, A.; Paukszto, L.; Jastrzebski, J.P.; Szeszko, K.; Gowkielewicz, M.; Lepiarczyk, E.; Jozwik, M.; Majewski, M.K. Placenta transcriptome profiling in intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Whitehead, C.L.; McNamara, H.; Walker, S.P.; Alexiadis, M.; Fuller, P.J.; Vickers, D.K.; Hannan, N.J.; Hastie, R.; Tuohey, L.; Kaitu’u-Lino, T.J.; et al. Identifying late-onset fetal growth restriction by measuring circulating placental RNA in the maternal blood at 28 weeks’ gestation. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2016, 214, 521.e521–521.e528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Szenasi, N.L.; Toth, E.; Balogh, A.; Juhasz, K.; Karaszi, K.; Ozohanics, O.; Gelencser, Z.; Kiraly, P.; Hargitai, B.; Drahos, L.; et al. Proteomic identification of membrane-associated placental protein 4 (MP4) as perlecan and characterization of its placental expression in normal and pathologic pregnancies. PeerJ 2019, 7, e6982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Heyer-Chauhan, N.; Ovbude, I.J.; Hills, A.A.; Sullivan, M.H.; Hills, F.A. Placental syndecan-1 and sulphated glycosaminoglycans are decreased in preeclampsia. J. Perinat. Med. 2014, 42, 329–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Alici Davutoglu, E.; Akkaya Firat, A.; Ozel, A.; Yilmaz, N.; Uzun, I.; Temel Yuksel, I.; Madazli, R. Evaluation of maternal serum hypoxia inducible factor-1alpha, progranulin and syndecan-1 levels in pregnancies with early- and late-onset preeclampsia. J. Matern. Fetal. Neonatal. Med. 2018, 31, 1976–1982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Kornacki, J.; Wirstlein, P.; Wender-Ozegowska, E. Levels of syndecan-1 and hyaluronan in early- and late-onset preeclampsia. Pregnancy Hypertens 2019, 18, 108–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Hassani Lahsinoui, H.; Amraoui, F.; Spijkers, L.J.A.; Veenboer, G.J.M.; Peters, S.L.M.; van Vlies, N.; Vogt, L.; Ris-Stalpers, C.; van den Born, B.J.H.; Afink, G.B. Soluble syndecan-1 and glycosaminoglycans in preeclamptic and normotensive pregnancies. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 4387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Than, N.G.; Romero, R.; Goodman, M.; Weckle, A.; Xing, J.; Dong, Z.; Xu, Y.; Tarquini, F.; Szilagyi, A.; Gal, P.; et al. A primate subfamily of galectins expressed at the maternal-fetal interface that promote immune cell death. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 9731–9736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Than, N.G.; Romero, R.; Meiri, H.; Erez, O.; Xu, Y.; Tarquini, F.; Barna, L.; Szilagyi, A.; Ackerman, R.; Sammar, M.; et al. PP13, maternal ABO blood groups and the risk assessment of pregnancy complications. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e21564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Than, N.G.; Balogh, A.; Romero, R.; Karpati, E.; Erez, O.; Szilagyi, A.; Kovalszky, I.; Sammar, M.; Gizurarson, S.; Matko, J.; et al. Placental Protein 13 (PP13)—A placental immunoregulatory galectin protecting pregnancy. Front. Immunol. 2014, 5, 348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Than, N.G.; Romero, R.; Balogh, A.; Karpati, E.; Mastrolia, S.A.; Staretz-Chacham, O.; Hahn, S.; Erez, O.; Papp, Z.; Kim, C.J. Galectins: Double-edged swords in the cross-roads of pregnancy complications and female reproductive tract inflammation and neoplasia. J. Pathol. Transl. Med. 2015, 49, 181–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Than, N.G.; Abdul Rahman, O.; Magenheim, R.; Nagy, B.; Fule, T.; Hargitai, B.; Sammar, M.; Hupuczi, P.; Tarca, A.L.; Szabo, G.; et al. Placental protein 13 (galectin-13) has decreased placental expression but increased shedding and maternal serum concentrations in patients presenting with preterm pre-eclampsia and HELLP syndrome. Virchows Arch. 2008, 453, 387–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Balogh, A.; Pozsgay, J.; Matko, J.; Dong, Z.; Kim, C.J.; Varkonyi, T.; Sammar, M.; Rigo, J., Jr.; Meiri, H.; Romero, R.; et al. Placental protein 13 (PP13/galectin-13) undergoes lipid raft-associated subcellular redistribution in the syncytiotrophoblast in preterm preeclampsia and HELLP syndrome. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2011, 205, 156.e1–156.e14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Than, N.G.; Romero, R.; Xu, Y.; Erez, O.; Xu, Z.; Bhatti, G.; Leavitt, R.; Chung, T.H.; El-Azzamy, H.; LaJeunesse, C.; et al. Evolutionary origins of the placental expression of chromosome 19 cluster galectins and their complex dysregulation in preeclampsia. Placenta 2014, 35, 855–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Burton, G.J.; Jauniaux, E. Placental oxidative stress: From miscarriage to preeclampsia. J. Soc. Gynecol. Investig. 2004, 11, 342–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Szabo, S.; Mody, M.; Romero, R.; Xu, Y.; Karaszi, K.; Mihalik, N.; Xu, Z.; Bhatti, G.; Fule, T.; Hupuczi, P.; et al. Activation of villous trophoblastic p38 and ERK1/2 signaling pathways in preterm preeclampsia and HELLP syndrome. Pathol. Oncol. Res. 2015, 21, 659–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Garcha, D.; Walker, S.P.; MacDonald, T.M.; Hyett, J.; Jellins, J.; Myers, J.; Illanes, S.E.; Nien, J.K.; Schepeler, M.; Keenan, E.; et al. Circulating syndecan-1 is reduced in pregnancies with poor fetal growth and its secretion regulated by matrix metalloproteinases and the mitochondria. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 16595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Bernfield, M.; Gotte, M.; Park, P.W.; Reizes, O.; Fitzgerald, M.L.; Lincecum, J.; Zako, M. Functions of cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1999, 68, 729–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Prakash, G.J.; Suman, P.; Gupta, S.K. Relevance of syndecan-1 in the trophoblastic BeWo cell syncytialization. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2011, 66, 385–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Iba, K.; Albrechtsen, R.; Gilpin, B.; Frohlich, C.; Loechel, F.; Zolkiewska, A.; Ishiguro, K.; Kojima, T.; Liu, W.; Langford, J.K.; et al. The cysteine-rich domain of human ADAM 12 supports cell adhesion through syndecans and triggers signaling events that lead to beta1 integrin-dependent cell spreading. J. Cell Biol. 2000, 149, 1143–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Aghababaei, M.; Hogg, K.; Perdu, S.; Robinson, W.P.; Beristain, A.G. ADAM12-directed ectodomain shedding of E-cadherin potentiates trophoblast fusion. Cell Death Differ. 2015, 22, 1970–1984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Wang, Z.; Li, R.; Tan, J.; Peng, L.; Wang, P.; Liu, J.; Xiong, H.; Jiang, B.; Chen, Y. Syndecan-1 acts in synergy with tight junction through Stat3 signaling to maintain intestinal mucosal barrier and prevent bacterial translocation. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2015, 21, 1894–1907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Moore, K.H.; Murphy, H.A.; Chapman, H.; George, E.M. Syncytialization alters the extracellular matrix and barrier function of placental trophoblasts. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2021, 321, C694–C703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Biadasiewicz, K.; Fock, V.; Dekan, S.; Proestling, K.; Velicky, P.; Haider, S.; Knofler, M.; Frohlich, C.; Pollheimer, J. Extravillous trophoblast-associated ADAM12 exerts pro-invasive properties, including induction of integrin beta 1-mediated cellular spreading. Biol. Reprod. 2014, 90, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Boeddeker, S.J.; Baston-Buest, D.M.; Altergot-Ahmad, O.; Kruessel, J.S.; Hess, A.P. Syndecan-1 knockdown in endometrial epithelial cells alters their apoptotic protein profile and enhances the inducibility of apoptosis. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2014, 20, 567–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Boeddeker, S.J.; Baston-Buest, D.M.; Fehm, T.; Kruessel, J.; Hess, A. Decidualization and syndecan-1 knock down sensitize endometrial stromal cells to apoptosis induced by embryonic stimuli. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0121103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Baston-Bust, D.M.; Gotte, M.; Janni, W.; Krussel, J.S.; Hess, A.P. Syndecan-1 knock-down in decidualized human endometrial stromal cells leads to significant changes in cytokine and angiogenic factor expression patterns. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2010, 8, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Knofler, M.; Pollheimer, J. Human placental trophoblast invasion and differentiation: A particular focus on Wnt signaling. Front. Genet. 2013, 4, 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Manon-Jensen, T.; Itoh, Y.; Couchman, J.R. Proteoglycans in health and disease: The multiple roles of syndecan shedding. FEBS J. 2010, 277, 3876–3889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Daglar, K.; Kirbas, A.; Timur, H.; Ozturk Inal, Z.; Danisman, N. Placental levels of total oxidative and anti-oxidative status, ADAMTS-12 and decorin in early- and late-onset severe preeclampsia. J. Matern. Fetal. Neonatal. Med. 2016, 29, 4059–4064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Varkonyi, T.; Nagy, B.; Fule, T.; Tarca, A.L.; Karaszi, K.; Schonleber, J.; Hupuczi, P.; Mihalik, N.; Kovalszky, I.; Rigo, J., Jr.; et al. Microarray profiling reveals that placental transcriptomes of early-onset HELLP syndrome and preeclampsia are similar. Placenta 2011, 32, S21–S29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Sjostedt, E.; Zhong, W.; Fagerberg, L.; Karlsson, M.; Mitsios, N.; Adori, C.; Oksvold, P.; Edfors, F.; Limiszewska, A.; Hikmet, F.; et al. An atlas of the protein-coding genes in the human, pig, and mouse brain. Science 2020, 367, eaay5947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Kliman, H.J.; Nestler, J.E.; Sermasi, E.; Sanger, J.M.; Strauss, J.F., 3rd. Purification, characterization, and in vitro differentiation of cytotrophoblasts from human term placentae. Endocrinology 1986, 118, 1567–1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Ijms 23 05798 g001 550
Figure 1. Placental expression of proteoglycan genes. (a) Absolute microarray gene expression values in the BioGPS database [49,50] were visualized on a heatmap. Color code depicts log2 gene expression levels. Bold letter: expression above threshold 100. Grey color: no data were available. (b) Placental expression of proteoglycan genes was compared to the median expression of 78 other tissues or cells. Differential expression of proteoglycan genes in the placenta was visualized on a heatmap. Color code depicts log2 gene expression ratios. Grey color: no data were available. (c) Real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) validation of BioGPS data on SDC1 expression in human tissues (n = 3) was visualized on the diagram as the percentage of placental expression. SDC1 mRNA expression values were normalized to RPLP0. Unpaired t-test was used for the analysis of SDC1 expression profiling with the Human Major Tissue qPCR Array. (* p < 0.05). Ribosomal Protein Lateral Stalk Subunit P0—RPLP0; syndecan-1—SDC1.
Figure 1. Placental expression of proteoglycan genes. (a) Absolute microarray gene expression values in the BioGPS database [49,50] were visualized on a heatmap. Color code depicts log2 gene expression levels. Bold letter: expression above threshold 100. Grey color: no data were available. (b) Placental expression of proteoglycan genes was compared to the median expression of 78 other tissues or cells. Differential expression of proteoglycan genes in the placenta was visualized on a heatmap. Color code depicts log2 gene expression ratios. Grey color: no data were available. (c) Real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) validation of BioGPS data on SDC1 expression in human tissues (n = 3) was visualized on the diagram as the percentage of placental expression. SDC1 mRNA expression values were normalized to RPLP0. Unpaired t-test was used for the analysis of SDC1 expression profiling with the Human Major Tissue qPCR Array. (* p < 0.05). Ribosomal Protein Lateral Stalk Subunit P0—RPLP0; syndecan-1—SDC1.
Ijms 23 05798 g001
Ijms 23 05798 g002 550
Figure 2. Changes in proteoglycan gene expression during villous trophoblast differentiation. (a) Microarray data were obtained from primary villous trophoblast cells isolated from third-trimester normal placentas (n = 3) during a seven-day differentiation period. The largest differences in gene expression compared to day 0 were visualized on a heatmap. Color code depicts log2 gene expression ratios. Grey color: no data were available. The original study was published by Szilagyi et al. [52]. (b) SDC1 expression was monitored during villous trophoblast differentiation. qRT-PCR data were obtained from an extended set of primary villous trophoblast cells isolated from third-trimester normal placentas (n = 5) during a seven-day differentiation period. Relative expression of SDC1, normalized to RPLP0, was visualized on the diagraph. (c) Changes in syndecan-1 protein concentration in cell culture supernatants (n = 5) were examined throughout spontaneous syncytial differentiation of primary villous trophoblast cells. One-Way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post-hoc test was used for the analysis of qRT-PCR and ELISA results (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001). Ribosomal Protein Lateral Stalk Subunit P0—RPLP0; syndecan-1—SDC1.
Figure 2. Changes in proteoglycan gene expression during villous trophoblast differentiation. (a) Microarray data were obtained from primary villous trophoblast cells isolated from third-trimester normal placentas (n = 3) during a seven-day differentiation period. The largest differences in gene expression compared to day 0 were visualized on a heatmap. Color code depicts log2 gene expression ratios. Grey color: no data were available. The original study was published by Szilagyi et al. [52]. (b) SDC1 expression was monitored during villous trophoblast differentiation. qRT-PCR data were obtained from an extended set of primary villous trophoblast cells isolated from third-trimester normal placentas (n = 5) during a seven-day differentiation period. Relative expression of SDC1, normalized to RPLP0, was visualized on the diagraph. (c) Changes in syndecan-1 protein concentration in cell culture supernatants (n = 5) were examined throughout spontaneous syncytial differentiation of primary villous trophoblast cells. One-Way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post-hoc test was used for the analysis of qRT-PCR and ELISA results (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001). Ribosomal Protein Lateral Stalk Subunit P0—RPLP0; syndecan-1—SDC1.
Ijms 23 05798 g002
Ijms 23 05798 g003 550
Figure 3. SDC1 expression in the placenta. (a) Single-cell RNA-seq data, derived from first-trimester placentas, were downloaded from the Human Protein Atlas [56]. The original study was performed by Vento-Tormo et al. [55]. SDC1 mRNA expression (pTPM) in trophoblast cell clusters (colored with shades of red) was visualized on a bar chart. (b) Single-cell RNA-seq data, derived from term placentas, were downloaded from http://genome.grid.wayne.edu/sclabor/ (accessed on 5 April 2022). The study was performed by Pique-Regi et al. [57]. SDC1 mRNA expression (normalized log2 count data) in cell clusters in three placental compartments (basal plate, placenta villi, and chorioamniotic membranes) was visualized on a histogram chart. Non-proliferative interstitial—npi; protein-transcripts per million—pTPM.
Figure 3. SDC1 expression in the placenta. (a) Single-cell RNA-seq data, derived from first-trimester placentas, were downloaded from the Human Protein Atlas [56]. The original study was performed by Vento-Tormo et al. [55]. SDC1 mRNA expression (pTPM) in trophoblast cell clusters (colored with shades of red) was visualized on a bar chart. (b) Single-cell RNA-seq data, derived from term placentas, were downloaded from http://genome.grid.wayne.edu/sclabor/ (accessed on 5 April 2022). The study was performed by Pique-Regi et al. [57]. SDC1 mRNA expression (normalized log2 count data) in cell clusters in three placental compartments (basal plate, placenta villi, and chorioamniotic membranes) was visualized on a histogram chart. Non-proliferative interstitial—npi; protein-transcripts per million—pTPM.
Ijms 23 05798 g003
Ijms 23 05798 g004 550
Figure 4. Differentially expressed proteoglycan genes in invasive extravillous trophoblast cells compared to villous cytotrophoblast cells. Microarray data from two independent GEO (study #1) [63] or ArrayExpress (study #2) [13] datasets were reanalyzed. Color code depicts log2 gene expression ratios. Red indicates higher gene expression in extravillous trophoblasts, while blue depicts higher gene expression in villous cytotrophoblasts. Stars show significant differences.
Figure 4. Differentially expressed proteoglycan genes in invasive extravillous trophoblast cells compared to villous cytotrophoblast cells. Microarray data from two independent GEO (study #1) [63] or ArrayExpress (study #2) [13] datasets were reanalyzed. Color code depicts log2 gene expression ratios. Red indicates higher gene expression in extravillous trophoblasts, while blue depicts higher gene expression in villous cytotrophoblasts. Stars show significant differences.
Ijms 23 05798 g004
Ijms 23 05798 g005 550
Figure 5. Expression of selected proteoglycan genes in the placenta. Single-cell RNA-seq data were downloaded from the Human Protein Atlas [56]. The original study was performed by Vento-Tormo et al. [55]. ACAN (a), BGN (b), HSPG2 (c), and GPC4 (d) mRNA expression (pTPM) in trophoblast cell clusters (colored with shades of red) were visualized on a bar chart. Protein-transcripts per million—pTPM.
Figure 5. Expression of selected proteoglycan genes in the placenta. Single-cell RNA-seq data were downloaded from the Human Protein Atlas [56]. The original study was performed by Vento-Tormo et al. [55]. ACAN (a), BGN (b), HSPG2 (c), and GPC4 (d) mRNA expression (pTPM) in trophoblast cell clusters (colored with shades of red) were visualized on a bar chart. Protein-transcripts per million—pTPM.
Ijms 23 05798 g005
Ijms 23 05798 g006 550
Figure 6. Placental proteoglycan gene expression in pre-eclampsia. (a) Placental microarray data from women with early-onset pre-eclampsia (n = 12) and preterm controls (n = 5) were published by Than et al. [51]. Color code depicts log2 gene expression ratios between cases and controls. Red indicates higher gene expression, while blue depicts lower gene expression in pre-eclampsia. Stars show significant differences. (b) Single-cell RNA-seq data from women with early-onset pre-eclampsia and preterm controls were published by Zhang et al. [70]. Differentially expressed genes in villous cytotrophoblasts (VCT), in the syncytiotrophoblast (SCT), and in extravillous trophoblasts (EVT) were visualized on a heatmap. Red indicates higher gene expression, blue depicts lower gene expression in pre-eclampsia (log2 fold change, q-value < 0.05), and grey depicts non-differentially expressed genes.
Figure 6. Placental proteoglycan gene expression in pre-eclampsia. (a) Placental microarray data from women with early-onset pre-eclampsia (n = 12) and preterm controls (n = 5) were published by Than et al. [51]. Color code depicts log2 gene expression ratios between cases and controls. Red indicates higher gene expression, while blue depicts lower gene expression in pre-eclampsia. Stars show significant differences. (b) Single-cell RNA-seq data from women with early-onset pre-eclampsia and preterm controls were published by Zhang et al. [70]. Differentially expressed genes in villous cytotrophoblasts (VCT), in the syncytiotrophoblast (SCT), and in extravillous trophoblasts (EVT) were visualized on a heatmap. Red indicates higher gene expression, blue depicts lower gene expression in pre-eclampsia (log2 fold change, q-value < 0.05), and grey depicts non-differentially expressed genes.
Ijms 23 05798 g006
Ijms 23 05798 g007 550
Figure 7. Physiological aspects of syndecan-1 at the maternal-fetal interface. The figure represents multiple roles of syndecan-1 in implantation, angiogenesis, maternal-fetal immune tolerance, and trophoblast invasion. (a) Embryo implantation. (b) Formation of primary villi by proliferative cytotrophoblasts and syncytialization. (c) Formation of tertiary villi, placental angiogenesis, extravillous trophoblast invasion, and spiral artery remodeling. Amniotic epithelium, AE; cell column trophoblast, CCT; dendritic cell, DC; decidual fibroblast, DF; embryoblast, EB; endothelial cell, EC; extracellular matrix, ECM; extraembryonic mesoderm, EM; endovascular cytotrophoblast, eCTB; giant cell, GC; inner cell mass, ICM; interstitial cytotrophoblast, iCTB; luminal uterine epithelium, LUE; lacunae, L; matrix metalloproteinase, MMP; natural killer, NK; placental fibroblast, pF; primitive syncytium, PS; placental vessel, pV; spiral artery, SA; syncytium, S; smooth muscle cell, SMC; trophectoderm, TE; uterine gland, UG; uterine NK cell, uNK; uterine vessel, UV; villous cytotrophoblast, vCTB. Cartoons are adapted from Knöfler and Pollheimer [103] under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Figure 7. Physiological aspects of syndecan-1 at the maternal-fetal interface. The figure represents multiple roles of syndecan-1 in implantation, angiogenesis, maternal-fetal immune tolerance, and trophoblast invasion. (a) Embryo implantation. (b) Formation of primary villi by proliferative cytotrophoblasts and syncytialization. (c) Formation of tertiary villi, placental angiogenesis, extravillous trophoblast invasion, and spiral artery remodeling. Amniotic epithelium, AE; cell column trophoblast, CCT; dendritic cell, DC; decidual fibroblast, DF; embryoblast, EB; endothelial cell, EC; extracellular matrix, ECM; extraembryonic mesoderm, EM; endovascular cytotrophoblast, eCTB; giant cell, GC; inner cell mass, ICM; interstitial cytotrophoblast, iCTB; luminal uterine epithelium, LUE; lacunae, L; matrix metalloproteinase, MMP; natural killer, NK; placental fibroblast, pF; primitive syncytium, PS; placental vessel, pV; spiral artery, SA; syncytium, S; smooth muscle cell, SMC; trophectoderm, TE; uterine gland, UG; uterine NK cell, uNK; uterine vessel, UV; villous cytotrophoblast, vCTB. Cartoons are adapted from Knöfler and Pollheimer [103] under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Ijms 23 05798 g007
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Oravecz, O.; Balogh, A.; Romero, R.; Xu, Y.; Juhasz, K.; Gelencser, Z.; Xu, Z.; Bhatti, G.; Pique-Regi, R.; Peterfia, B.; et al. Proteoglycans: Systems-Level Insight into Their Expression in Healthy and Diseased Placentas. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 5798. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23105798

AMA Style

Oravecz O, Balogh A, Romero R, Xu Y, Juhasz K, Gelencser Z, Xu Z, Bhatti G, Pique-Regi R, Peterfia B, et al. Proteoglycans: Systems-Level Insight into Their Expression in Healthy and Diseased Placentas. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(10):5798. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23105798

Chicago/Turabian Style

Oravecz, Orsolya, Andrea Balogh, Roberto Romero, Yi Xu, Kata Juhasz, Zsolt Gelencser, Zhonghui Xu, Gaurav Bhatti, Roger Pique-Regi, Balint Peterfia, and et al. 2022. "Proteoglycans: Systems-Level Insight into Their Expression in Healthy and Diseased Placentas" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 10: 5798. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23105798

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop