Next Article in Journal
Developmental Programming of the Metabolic Syndrome: Can We Reprogram with Resveratrol?
Next Article in Special Issue
Vitamin D: Effect on Haematopoiesis and Immune System and Clinical Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Identification of Oxidative Stress in Red Blood Cells with Nanoscale Chemical Resolution by Infrared Nanospectroscopy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Vitamin D and Influenza—Prevention or Therapy?
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 19
Issue 9
10.3390/ijms19092583
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Antiproliferative Activity of Non-Calcemic Vitamin D Analogs on Human Melanoma Lines in Relation to VDR and PDIA3 Receptors

by
Tomasz Wasiewicz
1,
Anna Piotrowska
1,
Justyna Wierzbicka
1,
Andrzej T. Slominski
2,3,4 and
Michal A. Zmijewski
1,*
1
Department of Histology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland
2
Department of Dermatology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
3
Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cancer Chemoprevention Program, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
4
VA Medical Center, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19(9), 2583; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19092583
Submission received: 2 August 2018 / Revised: 21 August 2018 / Accepted: 24 August 2018 / Published: 31 August 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vitamin D and Human Health)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Vitamin D is a precursor for secosteroidal hormones, which demonstrate pleiotropic biological activities, including the regulation of growth and the differentiation of normal and malignant cells. Our previous studies have indicated that the inhibition of melanoma proliferation by a short side-chain, low calcemic analog of vitamin D—21(OH)pD is not fully dependent on the expression of vitamin D receptor (VDR). We have examined the effects of classic vitamin D metabolites, 1,25(OH)2D3 and 25(OH)D3, and two low calcemic vitamin D analogs, (21(OH)pD and calcipotriol), on proliferation, mRNA expression and vitamin D receptor (VDR) translocation in three human melanoma cell lines: WM98, A375 and SK-MEL-188b (subline b of SK-MEL-188, which lost responsiveness to 1,25(OH)2D3 and became VDR−/−CYP27B1−/−). All tested compounds efficiently inhibited the proliferation of WM98 and A375 melanoma cells except SK-MEL-188b, in which only the short side-chain vitamin D analog—21(OH)pD was effective. Overall, 21(OH)pD was the most potent compound in all three melanoma cell lines in the study. The lack of responsiveness of SK-MEL-188b to 1,25(OH)2D3, 25(OH)D3 and calcipotriol is explained by a lack of characteristic transcripts for the VDR, its splicing variants as well as for vitamin D-activating enzyme CYP27B1. On the other hand, the expression of VDR and its splicing variants and other vitamin D related genes (RXR, PDIA3, CYP3A4, CYP2R1, CYP27B1, CYP24A1 and CYP11A1) was detected in WM98 and A375 melanomas with the transcript levels being modulated by vitamin D analogs. The expression of VDR isoforms in WM98 cells was stimulated strongly by calcipotriol. The antiproliferative activities of 21(OH)pD appear not to require VDR translocation to the nucleus, which explains the high efficacy of this noncalcemic pregnacalciferol analog in SK-MEL-188b melanoma, that is, VDR−/−. Therefore, we propose that 21(OH)pD is a good candidate for melanoma therapy, although the mechanism of its action remains to be defined.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Vitamin D is a naturally occurring hormone precursor, which after activation serves as a pleiotropic regulator of homeostasis on cellular and whole organism levels [1,2]. It is produced in the skin which is subjected to the ultraviolet B (UVB) fraction of sunlight or could be acquired from nutritional sources and supplementation. UVB exposure results in the conversion of epidermal 7-dehydrocholesterol (7DHC) into pre-vitamin D3, which undergoes subsequent isomerization to vitamin D3 [2,3,4,5]. Vitamin D3 has to be hydroxylated in order to implement its biological activities. The first step takes place in the liver, where vitamin D3 is converted to 25(OH)D3 (25-hydroxyvitamin D3, calcifediol) by CYP2R1, CYP27A1 or CYP3A4 (CYP3A4 belongs to cytochrome P450 superfamily and is involved in drug metabolism, but also has a capacity for vitamin D hydroxylation), and 25(OH)D3 is subsequently hydroxylated by 1α-hydroxylase (CYP27B1) in the kidney. In addition, 1,25(OH)2D3 can be generated locally in many cell types (keratinocytes, dendritic cells, melanocytes, lymphocytes and cancer cells) expressing appropriate enzymatic machinery [6,7]. The level of 1,25(OH)2D3 and its metabolites in circulation are tightly regulated through a negative feedback loop by 24-hydroxylase (CYP24A1), which metabolizes calcitriol into water-soluble and inactive calcitroic acid [8]. The catalytically inactive splicing variant of CYP24A1 (CYP24SV) may serve as dominant negative regulator of vitamin D3 catabolism and possibly contribute to the extracellular accumulation of 1,25(OH)2D3 [9]. Most recently, it was discovered that CYP11A1, the rate limiting enzyme of steroidogenesis, also metabolizes 7DHC, vitamin D3 and lumisterol to their corresponding hydroxyderivatives with full and short side-chains [10,11,12,13,14,15].
According to the genomic pathway, active forms of vitamin D3 exert their biological activities through interactions with the VDR, which is expressed by a majority of cells in the body [16,17]. Activated VDR forms a heterodimer with retinoid X receptor (RXR), and this complex is translocated to the nucleus where it binds to the VDREs (vitamin D response elements) and activates the expression of hundreds of human genes [17,18]. The activity of this complex is also regulated by the recruitment of co-activators or co-repressors to modulate the expression of selected genes, including those participating in the inhibition of cell cycle progression and the stimulation of differentiation and apoptosis [19,20,21,22].
In addition to the well-characterized vitamin D3 genomic actions, its analogs may also exert a rapid, non-genomic response (RR: rapid response) [23,24,25]. There is growing evidence that the co-localization of VDR [26,27] with caveolae of plasma membrane, as well as the binding of vitamin D to PDIA3 (Protein disulfide-isomerase A3), is responsible for the alternative (non-genomic) action of vitamin D3 and its analogs [23,28].
According to epidemiological studies, the incidence of human malignant melanoma has been increasing steadily since the 1970s [29,30,31,32]. Early detection of melanoma results in a good prognosis for patients; however, the survival rate and therapeutic procedures for advanced or metastatic melanomas are very limited. Ultraviolet radiation, in addition to being fully carcinogenic and a main cause of melanoma [32,33,34], is also the most important factor promoting the formation of vitamin D3. The anti-melanoma activity of vitamin D derivatives have been reported previously [35,36,37,38,39,40]. In addition, the presence of specific polymorphisms of VDR [41,42,43] or a decreased expression of VDR, CYP27B1, CYP24A1 and defects in vitamin D signaling are linked to more advanced stages of melanoma or poorer prognosis [44,45,46,47,48]. Furthermore, proper supplementation with vitamin D is believed to be an important factor in cancer prevention [47,49,50,51].
Active forms of vitamin D3 show antiproliferative properties against several types of cancer, including colorectal cancer [52], breast cancer [53], prostate cancer [54] and melanoma [39,40,55,56,57,58,59]. Furthermore, the use of 1,25(OH)2D3 as an anticancer drug in very high concentrations (above 50,000 units/day) is currently under clinical investigation; however, it has to be acknowledged that it could potentially cause hypercalcemia [40,50,60]. Since vitamin D3 analogs with modified or shortened side-chains were shown to have low or no effect on calcium levels [59,61,62,63], they are potentially better alternatives for calcitriol. So far, more than 3000 vitamin D3 analogs have been synthesized, and their biological activity is still intensively investigated as a single agent or in combination with other cytostatics [40,64,65,66]. In this study, we have investigated the response of three human melanoma cell lines against four vitamin D3 analogs. We have analyzed the antiproliferative potential of analogs (Figure 1) and found that 21(OH)pD inhibits melanoma growth through a mechanism independent from VDR or PDIA3.

2. Results

2.1. New Vitamin D3 Analogs Effectively Inhibit A375 Cell Proliferation

Our previous studies on human melanomas SK-MEL-188 [10,39,57,59,62,67,68,69], A375 [55], and WM98 [39,68] demonstrated the sensitivity of melanoma cells to vitamin D3 analogs with short and full side-chains. The efficacy of compounds was attenuated by melanogenesis, which was associated with the downregulation of VDR expression [56,68]. However, it was also shown that the antiproliferative activity of short side-chain analogs of vitamin D3, such as 21(OH)pD, were not fully dependent on VDR expression in rodent melanomas [56], consistent with the poor docking score on the ligand binding domain of the VDR and the poor translocation of VDR to the nucleus [69].
To better understand the effect of VDR expression on the differential action of vitamin D3 analogs, we used three human melanoma lines, A375 and WM98 and a subline b of SKMEL-188 which lost responsiveness to vitamin D during in vitro passaging [55], and detected the VDR expression and sensitivity to selected vitamin D analogs (1,25(OH)2D3, 25(OH)D3, 21(OH)pD and calcipotriol). As expected, these compounds [40,65] effectively inhibited the proliferation of A375 and WM98 melanomas expressing VDR receptor. IC50 values ranged from pM to µM, and the effects on cell proliferation were strongly dependent on the melanoma cell line and the nature of the compound. Interestingly, non-pigmented SK-MEL-188b was found to be resistant to vitamin D3 analogs with a full-length side-chain (1,25(OH)2D3, 25(OH)D3 and calcipotriol) and sensitive to short side-chained 21(OH)pD (Figure 2). Overall, 21(OH)pD was found to be the most potent inhibitor of growth in tested melanoma cell lines.

2.2. The Effect of Vitamin D3 Compounds on the Expression of Genes Related to Vitamin D3 Action or Metabolism

First, we investigated the expression of vitamin D3-related genes in untreated melanoma cells. As shown in Figure 3, PCR fragments characteristic for VDR, CYP27A1 and CYP27B1 mRNAs were below the level of detectability in SK-MEL-188b melanoma, which did not respond to vitamin D. Only the mRNA of PDIA3 was detected in this line. On the other hand, in A375 and WM98, cell lines corresponding to transcripts for all tested genes were detected.
Next, we tested the effects of vitamin D3 analogues on the relative mRNA levels of vitamin D3-related genes in responsive melanoma cell lines (A375 and WM98). The treatment of WM98 melanoma with full length side-chain vitamin D3 analogs (1,25(OH)2D3, 25(OH)D3 and calcipotriol) is presented in Figure 4. Only 1,25(OH)2D3 stimulated the expression of VDR Co-receptor RXR and of CYP27A1 (Figure 4B). All three analogs, however, stimulated the expression of CYP3A4, CYP2R1, CYP24A1 and its splicing variant CYP24A1sv. Interestingly, the strongest effect (approximately a 6-fold induction) on CYP2R1 mRNA level was observed in cells treated with calcipotriol (Figure 4C). Furthermore, the level of CYP27B1 mRNA was not affected by tested secosteroids (Figure 4G), while the expression of PDIA3 was stimulated only by 25(OH)D3 (Figure 4E).
The treatment of A375 melanoma with four vitamin D3 analogs (1,25(OH)2D3, calcipotriol and 21(OH)pD) decreased the expression of VDR, RXR, PDIA3, CYP2R1 genes (Figure 5). Interestingly, the strongest decrease in the mRNA levels of CYP3A4 and CYP2R1 was observed in A375 melanoma cells treated with 21(OH)pD. The induction of CYP24A1 gene was hundreds of times folds higher in cells treated with 1,25(OH)2D3 and calcipotriol when compared to 21(OH)pD, showing minimal effect. Finally, the mRNA level of CYP27B1 was not affected by vitamin D analogues and CYP11A1 was elevated in A375 melanoma cells only after treatment with calcipotriol.
It is well established that the antiproliferative effects of vitamin D3 analogs strongly depend on the expression of vitamin D receptor VDR [40,47,65]. As shown in Figure 3, the melanoma cell lines used in the study differ in their basal level of VDR expression, and the transcript is absent in SK-MEL-188b, which is not responsive to vitamin D. Theoretically, an alternative splicing of VDR pre-mRNA may results in the production of at least five alternative transcripts (Figure 6A); thus, the unique set of primers was designed in order to detect specific variants of VDR mRNA (Table S1). Detection of specific variants of VDR was confirmed by sequencing of PCR fragments previously separated on agarose gel (Figure 6B). WM98 and A375 melanoma cell lines express all four PCR fragments (Pr 1, Pr 2, Pr 4 and Pr 5) corresponding to VDR splicing variant c (Figure 6A). In the WM98 melanoma, the cell line presence of an mRNA characteristic for isoforms a (Pr 3) and b (Pr 4, upper band) was also detected. Interestingly, in SK-MEL-188b melanoma cells, only one fragment of mRNA corresponding to the alternative promoter region of VDR (isoform c) was detected. Finally, the effects of two vitamin D3 analogs 25(OH)D3 and calcipotriol on the alternative splicing of VDR pre-mRNA was tested in WM98 cell line (Figure 6C). It was show that treatment with calcipotriol, but not 25(OH)D3, resulted in at least 7-fold elevation of mRNA levels corresponding to all fragments of the VDR tested (fragments detected by a set of primers: Pr 1 to Pr 5).

2.3. Translocation of Vitamin D Receptor by Secosteroids

The ligand-induced translocation of VDR receptor into the nucleus was studied using A375 cells stably transduced with pLenti-CMV-VDR-EGFP lentiviral construct [70]. 1,25(OH)2D3 or calcipotriol induced a dose-dependent and efficient translocation of VDR-GFP fusion protein into the nucleus (Figure 7). A lack of VDR-GFP translocation to the nucleus was observed in cells treated with 21(OH)pD.

3. Discussion

There is growing evidence that vitamin D3 analogs are excellent candidates for melanoma therapy [40,47,65,71,72]. This is supported by the strong correlation between an adequate level of 25(OH)D3 (>30 ng/mL in the serum) and a decreased incidence or severity of several cancers, including melanoma [62,73,74,75,76,77]. However, the use of an active form of vitamin D3, 1,25(OH)2D3 is limited due to its potential hypercalcemic effects; thus, the development and biological evaluation of new low calcemic vitamin D3 derivatives is highly desirable [40,55,65,72].
Here, we present results showing the different sensitivities of three melanoma cell lines (SK-MEL-188b, A375 and WM98) to vitamin D3 analogs. Recently, we described vitamin D3-resistant clone of SK-MEL1-88 (SK-MEL-188b) [55]. Contrary to parental SK-MEL-188, this clone was insensitive to the treatment with 1,25(OH)2D3, or with several analogs of vitamin D2, except of PRI-1731 with the inverse orientation of A ring in comparison to parental 1,25(OH)2D3 by the introduction of (5Z,7Z) modification [55,78,79]. This clone does not express the coding region of VDR and of CYP27B1. Therefore, we call it SK-MEL-188VDR−/−CYP27B1−/−. Interestingly, a short side-chain analog of vitamin D3 with a pregnacalciferol-type configuration, such as 21(OH)pD, was shown to inhibit the growth of the SK-MEL-188b line. It has to be underlined that this analog, also showed high potency against two other melanoma cell lines in the study (A375 and WM98) and minimal stimulation of CYP24A1. This indicates that the antiproliferative properties of 21-OHpD are independent on its action on the VDR, which is consistent with our previous findings on pregnacalciferol derivatives acting as poor activators of VDR per VDR translocation studies and molecular modeling [69]. One of the possible mechanisms of 21(OH)pD action could include an activation of non-genomic pathways [25,80], including those linked to the PDIA3 protein [81,82]. However, interaction with other nuclear steroid receptors cannot be excluded. In addition, other receptors such as retinoic orphan acid receptors (ROR)α and γ can be considered since vitamin D hydroxyderivatives can act as reverse agonists on these receptors [62,83] and related pregnalumisterol derivatives can also act on RORα and RORγ [15]. These considerations require future in-depth investigations to define specific receptors for pD compounds (secosteroids with shortened side-chain).
Two other melanoma lines were responsive to vitamin D (WM98 and A375) and showed relatively high expression levels of VDR transcript. Thus, the studies presented above on three melanoma lines are consistent with reports showing that the expression of VDR is the key factor responsible for the antitumor activities of 1,25(OH)2D3 [18,47,84,85]. Of note is that its decreased expression correlates with advanced melanoma staging, progression and decreased overall patient survival and disease-free survival time [45,46]. Accordingly, VDR polymorphism [41,42,72] and decreased levels of 25(OH)D3 in the serum [33,86] positively correlate with melanoma prevalence and poor prognosis.
Here, we show that sensitivity to tested vitamin D3 hydroxyderivatives with full side-chains depends on VDR expression and its alternative splicing. Interestingly, sensitive melanoma lines (A375, WM98) expressed all three major VDR splicing variants, suggesting that they may play an important but not necessarily identical function in vitamin D3 signaling. Further studies are required to elucidate the significance of the expression of VDR splicing variants. Furthermore, the expression of vitamin D3-related genes was altered by vitamin D3 analogs, and the effects on the expression of VDR, RXR, PDIA3, CYP2R1 or CYP24A1 were stronger in WM98 melanoma cells in comparison to the A375 line. This phenomenon could explain higher sensitivity of WM98 to 1,25(OH)2D3 in comparison to A375 line.
In summary, low calcemic vitamin D3 analogs such as 25(OH)D3, 21(OH)pD or calcipotriol showed similar antiproliferative activity to 1,25(OH)2D3 in melanoma cell lines expressing VDR spliced variants. Furthermore, the short side-chain analog 21(OH)pD was found to be superior among vitamin D analogs and was the only one, which inhibited the growth of the melanoma subline negative for VDR, indicating a mechanism of action that is VDR-independent.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Cell Lines and Vitamin D Analogs

In our study, we determined the inhibitory effects of vitamin D3 analogs against immortalized human melanoma cell lines SK-MEL-188b, WM98 and A375. SK-MEL-188b cells were cultured in F10 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Sigma, Poznan, Poland) and 1× antibiotic-antimycotic solution (Anti-Anti, Sigma). A375 and WM98 cell lines were cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% anti-anti. To eliminate the influence of sterols present in fetal bovine serum in the experiments, we used 5% charcoal-stripped FBS (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Warsaw, Poland). Vitamin D3 analogs 1,25(OH)2D3, 25(OH)D3 and calcipotriol were acquired from the Pharmaceutical Research Institute (Warsaw, Poland), while the new short side analog 21(OH)pD was synthesized in collaboration with ProChimia Surfaces (Gdynia, Poland) as described previously [49,50]. The chemical structures of these secosteroids are presented in Figure 1.

4.2. SRB Assay

Melanoma cells were seeded on 96-well plates at a density of 8000 per well in an appropriate medium supplemented with 5% charcoal-stripped FBS and 1× anti-anti solution. After 24 h, the medium was replaced with the fresh one containing vehicle and serial dilutions of vitamin D3 analogs at concentrations from 10 pM to 1 μM. Following incubation for 48 h, 100 μL of 20% TCA (trichloroacetic acid) was added and cells were incubated for 1 h in 4 °C. The medium was discarded and cells were washed 5 times with sterile water. Afterwards, cells were dried and 100 μL of SRB (0.4 g sulforhodamin B in 100 mL 1% acetic acid) was added into the plate wells for 15 min incubation at room temperature. Next, cells were washed 5 times with 1% acetic acid, dried and resolved with 150 μL of 10 mM Tris (pH = 10.5) for 10 min in room temperature. The absorbance was measured spectroscopically at 570 nm with 96-well plate reader (BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA).

4.3. Classical PCR and Real-Time PCR Analysis

SK-MEL-188b, A375 and WM98 melanoma cells were treated with 1,25(OH)2D3, 25(OH)D3 and calcipotriol (only WM98 line) for 24 h (Figure 5 and Figure S1) or collected without treatment (Figure 3 and Figure 4). RNA was isolated using a Total RNA Kit (A&A Biotechnology, Gdynia, Poland). Reverse transcription (500 ng RNA/reaction) was carried out with a RevertAid™ First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Fermentas, Vilnius, Lithuania). Classic PCR and real-time PCR were performed using 5-fold diluted cDNA and 2× PCR Master Mix (A&A Biotechnology) or real time 2× PCR Master Mix SYBR Set A, B (A&A Biotechnology). The primers to amplify fragments of ACTB, VDR, RXR, PDIA3, CYP27A1, CYP2R1, CYP3A4, CYP27B1, CYP24A1, CYP24SV genes were designed with Primer Quest software (Integrated Device Technology, San Jose, CA, USA) (Table S1). The data was collected on a MJ Mini BioRad cycler (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA) or Termocycler StepOne Real-Time PCR Systems (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). PCR products were visualized using the Mupid-One electrophoresis system (BioRad) and ethidium bromide staining.

4.4. VDR Translocation

The melanoma A375 cell line was used to study the VDR receptor translocation to nucleus after vitamin D3 analog treatment. Cells were transduced by pLenti-CMV-VDR-EGFP-pgkpuro plasmid, where VDR and GFP were expressed as a fusion protein in cytoplasmic compartment. Cells were cultured on 12 wells plate (0.5 × 105 cells/well) in DMEM supplemented with 5% charcoal-stripped FBS and 24 h later medium was replaced with DMEM containing 1,25(OH)2D3, calcipotriol and 21(OH)pD at 0.01 µM, 0.1 µM or 1 µM concentrations. After 1 h of incubation VDR translocation from cytoplasm to nucleus was determined with fluorescent Eclipse TE300 microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan).

4.5. Statistical Analysis

SRB viability data was presented using one-way Anova test to compare experimental groups: cells were treated with vitamin D3 analogs with a concentration from 0.01 nM to 1000 nM with control samples (GraphPad Software). The antiproliferative potency of vitamin D3 analogs were compared by the calculation of EC50 for every compound (half maximal effective concentration). Real-time PCR data was analyzed with the comparative ΔΔ-Ct method normalized to the reference gene ACTB. As a control, a probe with sterile water was used instead of cDNA. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 4–6). Student’s t-test (for two groups) or one-way ANOVA with appropriate post-hoc test (for more than two groups) were used to analyze data using Excel (Microsoft) or Prism 7.00 (GraphPad Software), respectively. Statistically significant differences are denoted with asterisks: p < 0.05 (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.0001).

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/19/9/2583/s1.

Author Contributions

T.W. and A.P. and J.W. performed the main experiments, took part in data analysis and preparation of the manuscript. M.A.Z. and A.T.S. designed experiments; M.A.Z., T.W., J.W. and A.T.S. analyzed data and prepared final version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The study was supported by a grant of the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education, Project No. N405 623238 and National Science Center OPUS Program under contract 2017/25/B/NZ3/00431 to MAZ; and NIH grants 1 R01AR073004-01A1. 1 RO1 AR071189-01A1 and R21AR066505 to ATS. Authors would like to thank Adam Figarski, MD, for help in experiment with VDR translocation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

1α,25(OH)2D31α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (calcitriol)
21(OH)pD21-hydroxypregnacalciferol
25(OH)D325-hydroxyvitamin D3 (calcifediol)
7-DHC7-dehydrocholesterol (provitamin D3, cholesta-5,7-dien-3β-ol)
7-DHP7-dehydropregnenolone
MARRS receptorMembrane-Associated Rapid Response to Steroid binding protein (other names: ERp57, GRp58, Pdia3)
PDIA3Protein disulfide-isomerase A3
ROSreactive oxygen species
UVA/Bultraviolet radiation A and B
VDRvitamin D receptor
VDREvitamin D response elements

References

  1. Holick, M.F. Vitamin D: Evolutionary, physiological and health perspectives. Curr. Drug Targets 2011, 12, 4–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bikle, D.D. Vitamin D and the skin: Physiology and pathophysiology. Rev. Endocr. Metab. Dis. 2012, 13, 3–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wierzbicka, J.; Piotrowska, A.; Żmijewski, M.A. The renaissance of vitamin D. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2014, 61, 679–686. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Holick, M.F. Sunlight, UV-radiation, vitamin D and skin cancer: How much sunlight do we need? Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2014, 810, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Wacker, M.; Holick, M.F. Sunlight and vitamin D: A global perspective for health. Dermatoendocrinol 2013, 5, 51–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Tangpricha, V.; Flanagan, J.N.; Whitlatch, L.W.; Tseng, C.C.; Chen, T.C.; Holt, P.R.; Lipkin, M.S.; Holick, M.F. 25-hydroxyvitamin D-1α-hydroxylase in normal and malignant colon tissue. Lancet 2001, 357, 1673–1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Radermacher, J.; Diesel, B.; Seifert, M.; Tilgen, W.; Reichrath, J.; Fischer, U.; Meese, E. Expression analysis of CYP27B1 in tumor biopsies and cell cultures. Anticancer Res. 2006, 26, 2683–2686. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Yu, O.B.; Arnold, L.A. Calcitroic acid-a review. ACS Chem. Biol. 2016, 11, 2665–2672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Ren, S.; Nguyen, L.; Wu, S.; Encinas, C.; Adams, J.S.; Hewison, M. Alternative splicing of vitamin D-24-hydroxylase: A novel mechanism for the regulation of extrarenal 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D synthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 20604–20611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Slominski, A.T.; Zmijewski, M.A.; Semak, I.; Sweatman, T.; Janjetovic, Z.; Li, W.; Zjawiony, J.K.; Tuckey, R.C. Sequential metabolism of 7-dehydrocholesterol to steroidal 5,7-dienes in adrenal glands and its biological implication in the skin. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e4309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Slominski, A.T.; Li, W.; Kim, T.K.; Semak, I.; Wang, J.; Zjawiony, J.K.; Tuckey, R.C. Novel activities of cyp11a1 and their potential physiological significance. J. Steroid Biochem. 2015, 151, 25–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Slominski, A.T.; Kim, T.K.; Li, W.; Postlethwaite, A.; Tieu, E.W.; Tang, E.K.; Tuckey, R.C. Detection of novel cyp11a1-derived secosteroids in the human epidermis and serum and pig adrenal gland. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 14875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Slominski, A.T.; Kim, T.K.; Shehabi, H.Z.; Semak, I.; Tang, E.K.; Nguyen, M.N.; Benson, H.A.; Korik, E.; Janjetovic, Z.; Chen, J.; et al. In vivo evidence for a novel pathway of vitamin D3 metabolism initiated by P450scc and modified by CYP27B1. FASEB J. 2012, 26, 3901–3915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Slominski, A.T.; Kim, T.K.; Chen, J.; Nguyen, M.N.; Li, W.; Yates, C.R.; Sweatman, T.; Janjetovic, Z.; Tuckey, R.C. Cytochrome P450scc-dependent metabolism of 7-dehydrocholesterol in placenta and epidermal keratinocytes. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2012, 44, 2003–2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Slominski, A.T.; Kim, T.K.; Hobrath, J.V.; Janjetovic, Z.; Oak, A.S.W.; Postlethwaite, A.; Lin, Z.; Li, W.; Takeda, Y.; Jetten, A.M.; et al. Characterization of a new pathway that activates lumisterol in vivo to biologically active hydroxylumisterols. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 11434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Cavalier, E.; Delanaye, P.; Chapelle, J.P.; Souberbielle, J.C. Vitamin D: Current status and perspectives. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2009, 47, 120–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Campbell, M.J. Vitamin D and the RNA transcriptome: More than mRNA regulation. Front. Physiol. 2014, 5, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Long, M.D.; Sucheston-Campbell, L.E.; Campbell, M.J. Vitamin D receptor and RXR in the post-genomic era. J. Cell. Physiol. 2015, 230, 758–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Liaw, C.W.; Grigoriadis, D.E.; Lovenberg, T.W.; De Souza, E.B.; Maki, R.A. Localization of ligand-binding domains of human corticotropin-releasing factor receptor: A chimeric receptor approach. Mol. Endocrinol. 1997, 11, 980–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Kerry, D.M.; Dwivedi, P.P.; Hahn, C.N.; Morris, H.A.; Omdahl, J.L.; May, B.K. Transcriptional synergism between vitamin D-responsive elements in the rat 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 24-hydroxylase (CYP24) promoter. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 29715–29721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Wang, T.T.; Tavera-Mendoza, L.E.; Laperriere, D.; Libby, E.; MacLeod, N.B.; Nagai, Y.; Bourdeau, V.; Konstorum, A.; Lallemant, B.; Zhang, R.; et al. Large-scale in silico and microarray-based identification of direct 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 target genes. Mol. Endocrinol. 2005, 19, 2685–2695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Reichrath, J. Will analogs of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (calcitriol) open a new era in cancer therapy? Onkologie 2001, 24, 128–133. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Nemere, I.; Garbi, N.; Hämmerling, G.J.; Khanal, R.C. Intestinal cell calcium uptake and the targeted knockout of the 1,25D3-MARRS (membrane-associated, rapid response steroid-binding) receptor/PDIA3/Erp57. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 31859–31866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Cui, X.; Gooch, H.; Petty, A.; McGrath, J.J.; Eyles, D. Vitamin D and the brain: Genomic and non-genomic actions. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2017, 453, 131–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Hii, C.S.; Ferrante, A. The non-genomic actions of vitamin D. Nutrients 2016, 8, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Huhtakangas, J.A.; Olivera, C.J.; Bishop, J.E.; Zanello, L.P.; Norman, A.W. The vitamin D receptor is present in caveolae-enriched plasma membranes and binds 1α,25(OH)2-vitamin D3 in vivo and in vitro. Mol. Endocrinol. 2004, 18, 2660–2671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Zhao, G.; Simpson, R.U. Membrane localization, caveolin-3 association and rapid actions of vitamin D receptor in cardiac myocytes. Steroids 2010, 75, 555–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Nemere, I.; Safford, S.E.; Rohe, B.; DeSouza, M.M.; Farach-Carson, M.C. Identification and characterization of 1,25D3-membrane-associated rapid response, steroid (1,25D3-MARRS) binding protein. J. Steroid Biochem. 2004, 89–90, 281–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Strouse, J.J.; Fears, T.R.; Tucker, M.A.; Wayne, A.S. Pediatric melanoma: Risk factor and survival analysis of the surveillance, epidemiology and end results database. J. Clin. Oncol. 2005, 23, 4735–4741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Barroso, E.; Fernandez, L.P.; Milne, R.L.; Pita, G.; Sendagorta, E.; Floristan, U.; Feito, M.; Aviles, J.A.; Martin-Gonzalez, M.; Arias, J.I.; et al. Genetic analysis of the vitamin D receptor gene in two epithelial cancers: Melanoma and breast cancer case-control studies. BMC Cancer 2008, 8, 385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Yan, S.F.; Ramasamy, R.; Naka, Y.; Schmidt, A.M. Glycation, inflammation, and rage: A scaffold for the macrovascular complications of diabetes and beyond. Circ. Res. 2003, 93, 1159–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Arnold, M.; de Vries, E.; Whiteman, D.C.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F.; Parkin, D.M.; Soerjomataram, I. Global burden of cutaneous melanoma attributable to ultraviolet radiation in 2012. Int. J. Cancer 2018, 143, 1305–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Reichrath, J.; Reichrath, S. Sunlight, vitamin D and malignant melanoma: An update. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2014, 810, 390–405. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  34. Lo, J.A.; Fisher, D.E. The melanoma revolution: From UV carcinogenesis to a new era in therapeutics. Science 2014, 346, 945–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Mansur, C.P.; Gordon, P.R.; Ray, S.; Holick, M.F.; Gilchrest, B.A. Vitamin D, its precursors, and metabolites do not affect melanization of cultured human melanocytes. J. Investing. Dermatol. 1988, 91, 16–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Reichrath, J. Skin cancer prevention and UV-protection: How to avoid vitamin D-deficiency? Brit. J. Dermatol. 2009, 161, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Wagner, C.L.; McNeil, R.B.; Johnson, D.D.; Hulsey, T.C.; Ebeling, M.; Robinson, C.; Hamilton, S.A.; Hollis, B.W. Health characteristics and outcomes of two randomized vitamin D supplementation trials during pregnancy: A combined analysis. J. Steroid Biochem. 2013, 136, 313–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Pelczynska, M.; Switalska, M.; Maciejewska, M.; Jaroszewicz, I.; Kutner, A.; Opolski, A. Antiproliferative activity of vitamin D compounds in combination with cytostatics. Anticancer Res. 2006, 26, 2701–2705. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  39. Slominski, A.T.; Janjetovic, Z.; Kim, T.K.; Wright, A.C.; Grese, L.N.; Riney, S.J.; Nguyen, M.N.; Tuckey, R.C. Novel vitamin D hydroxyderivatives inhibit melanoma growth and show differential effects on normal melanocytes. Anticancer Res. 2012, 32, 3733–3742. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  40. Slominski, A.T.; Brożyna, A.A.; Skobowiat, C.; Zmijewski, M.A.; Kim, T.K.; Janjetovic, Z.; Oak, A.S.; Jozwicki, W.; Jetten, A.M.; Mason, R.S.; et al. On the role of classical and novel forms of vitamin D in melanoma progression and management. J. Steroid Biochem. 2018, 177, 159–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Cauci, S.; Maione, V.; Buligan, C.; Linussio, M.; Serraino, D.; Stinco, G. Bsmi (rs1544410) and foki (rs2228570) vitamin D receptor polymorphisms, smoking, and body mass index as risk factors of cutaneous malignant melanoma in northeast italy. Cancer Biol. Med. 2017, 14, 302–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. La Marra, F.; Stinco, G.; Buligan, C.; Chiriacò, G.; Serraino, D.; Di Loreto, C.; Cauci, S. Immunohistochemical evaluation of vitamin D receptor (VDR) expression in cutaneous melanoma tissues and four VDR gene polymorphisms. Cancer Biol. Med. 2017, 14, 162–175. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  43. Orlow, I.; Reiner, A.S.; Thomas, N.E.; Roy, P.; Kanetsky, P.A.; Luo, L.; Paine, S.; Armstrong, B.K.; Kricker, A.; Marrett, L.D.; et al. Vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and survival in patients with cutaneous melanoma: A population-based study. Carcinogenesis 2016, 37, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Brożyna, A.A.; Jochymski, C.; Janjetovic, Z.; Jóźwicki, W.; Tuckey, R.C.; Slominski, A.T. CYP24A1 expression inversely correlates with melanoma progression: Clinic-pathological studies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 19000–19017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Brożyna, A.A.; Jozwicki, W.; Janjetovic, Z.; Slominski, A.T. Expression of vitamin D receptor decreases during progression of pigmented skin lesions. Hum. Pathol. 2011, 42, 618–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Brożyna, A.A.; Jóźwicki, W.; Slominski, A.T. Decreased VDR expression in cutaneous melanomas as marker of tumor progression: New data and analyses. Anticancer Res. 2014, 34, 2735–2743. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  47. Slominski, A.T.; Brożyna, A.A.; Zmijewski, M.A.; Jóźwicki, W.; Jetten, A.M.; Mason, R.S.; Tuckey, R.C.; Elmets, C.A. Vitamin D signaling and melanoma: Role of vitamin D and its receptors in melanoma progression and management. Lab. Invest. 2017, 97, 706–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Brożyna, A.A.; Jóźwicki, W.; Janjetovic, Z.; Slominski, A.T. Expression of the vitamin D-activating enzyme 1α-hydroxylase (CYP27B1) decreases during melanoma progression. Hum. Pathol. 2013, 44, 374–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Timerman, D.; McEnery-Stonelake, M.; Joyce, C.J.; Nambudiri, V.E.; Hodi, F.S.; Claus, E.B.; Ibrahim, N.; Lin, J.Y. Vitamin D deficiency is associated with a worse prognosis in metastatic melanoma. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 6873–6882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Grant, W.B. Roles of solar UVB and vitamin D in reducing cancer risk and increasing survival. Anticancer Res. 2016, 36, 1357–1370. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  51. Płudowski, P.; Karczmarewicz, E.; Bayer, M.; Carter, G.; Chlebna-Sokół, D.; Czech-Kowalska, J.; Dębski, R.; Decsi, T.; Dobrzańska, A.; Franek, E.; et al. Practical guidelines for the supplementation of vitamin D and the treatment of deficits in central europe–recommended vitamin D intakes in the general population and groups at risk of vitamin D deficiency. Endokrynol. Pol. 2013, 64, 319–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Wierzbicka, J.M.; Binek, A.; Ahrends, T.; Nowacka, J.D.; Szydłowska, A.; Turczyk, Ł.; Wąsiewicz, T.; Wierzbicki, P.M.; Sądej, R.; Tuckey, R.C.; et al. Differential antitumor effects of vitamin d analogues on colorectal carcinoma in culture. Int. J. Oncol. 2015, 47, 1084–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Nag, K.; Sultana, N.; Kato, A.; Hirose, S. Headless splice variant acting as dominant negative calcitonin receptor. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2007, 362, 1037–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Giardino, W.J.; Mark, G.P.; Stenzel-Poore, M.P.; Ryabinin, A.E. Dissociation of corticotropin-releasing factor receptor subtype involvement in sensitivity to locomotor effects of methamphetamine and cocaine. Psychopharmacology 2012, 219, 1055–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Piotrowska, A.; Wierzbicka, J.; Nadkarni, S.; Brown, G.; Kutner, A.; Żmijewski, M.A. Antiproliferative activity of double point modified analogs of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D2 against human malignant melanoma cell lines. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Wasiewicz, T.; Szyszka, P.; Cichorek, M.; Janjetovic, Z.; Tuckey, R.C.; Slominski, A.T.; Zmijewski, M.A. Antitumor effects of vitamin D analogs on hamster and mouse melanoma cell lines in relation to melanin pigmentation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 6645–6667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Zmijewski, M.A.; Li, W.; Chen, J.; Kim, T.K.; Zjawiony, J.K.; Sweatman, T.W.; Miller, D.D.; Slominski, A.T. Synthesis and photochemical transformation of 3α21-dihydroxypregna-5,7-dien-20-one to novel secosteroids that show anti-melanoma activity. Steroids 2011, 76, 193–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Skobowiat, C.; Oak, A.S.; Kim, T.K.; Yang, C.H.; Pfeffer, L.M.; Tuckey, R.C.; Slominski, A.T. Noncalcemic 20-hydroxyvitamin D3 inhibits human melanoma growth in in vitro and in vivo models. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 9823–9834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Slominski, A.; Kim, T.K.; Zmijewski, M.A.; Janjetovic, Z.; Li, W.; Chen, J.; Kusniatsova, E.I.; Semak, I.; Postlethwaite, A.; Miller, D.D.; et al. Novel vitamin D photoproducts and their precursors in the skin. Dermatoendocrinol 2013, 5, 7–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Zmijewski, M.A.; Fisches, T.W.; Slominski, A.T. Melatonin regulates expression and activity of androgen related genes in human skin cells. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2008, 128, 893. [Google Scholar]
  61. Plum, L.A.; Prahl, J.M.; Ma, X.; Sicinski, R.R.; Gowlugari, S.; Clagett-Dame, M.; DeLuca, H.F. Biologically active noncalcemic analogs of 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D with an abbreviated side chain containing no hydroxyl. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 6900–6904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Slominski, A.T.; Kim, T.K.; Hobrath, J.V.; Oak, A.S.W.; Tang, E.K.Y.; Tieu, E.W.; Li, W.; Tuckey, R.C.; Jetten, A.M. Endogenously produced nonclassical vitamin D hydroxy-metabolites act as “Biased” Agonists on VDR and inverse agonists on roralpha and rorgamma. J. Steroid Biochem. 2017, 173, 42–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Wang, J.; Slominski, A.; Tuckey, R.C.; Janjetovic, Z.; Kulkarni, A.; Chen, J.; Postlethwaite, A.E.; Miller, D.; Li, W. 20-hydroxyvitamin D3 inhibits proliferation of cancer cells with high efficacy while being non-toxic. Anticancer Res. 2012, 32, 739–746. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  64. Duffy, M.J.; Murray, A.; Synnott, N.C.; O'Donovan, N.; Crown, J. Vitamin D analogues: Potential use in cancer treatment. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2017, 112, 190–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Szyszka, P.; Zmijewski, M.A.; Slominski, A.T. New vitamin D analogs as potential therapeutics in melanoma. Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther. 2012, 12, 585–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Reichrath, J.; Zouboulis, C.C.; Vogt, T.; Holick, M.F. Targeting the vitamin D endocrine system (VDES) for the management of inflammatory and malignant skin diseases: An historical view and outlook. Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord. 2016, 17, 405–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Zmijewski, M.A.; Li, W.; Zjawiony, J.K.; Sweatman, T.W.; Chen, J.; Miller, D.D.; Slominski, A.T. Photo-conversion of two epimers (20R and 20S) of pregna-5,7-diene-3β, 17α, 20-triol and their bioactivity in melanoma cells. Steroids 2009, 74, 218–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Janjetovic, Z.; Brozyna, A.A.; Tuckey, R.C.; Kim, T.K.; Nguyen, M.N.; Jozwicki, W.; Pfeffer, S.R.; Pfeffer, L.M.; Slominski, A.T. High basal NF-ĸB activity in nonpigmented melanoma cells is associated with an enhanced sensitivity to vitamin D3 derivatives. Brit. J. Cancer. 2011, 105, 1874–1884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Kim, T.K.; Wang, J.; Janjetovic, Z.; Chen, J.; Tuckey, R.C.; Nguyen, M.N.; Tang, E.K.; Miller, D.; Li, W.; Slominski, A.T. Correlation between secosteroid-induced vitamin D receptor activity in melanoma cells and computer-modeled receptor binding strength. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2012, 361, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Slominski, A.T.; Kim, T.K.; Janjetovic, Z.; Tuckey, R.C.; Bieniek, R.; Yue, J.; Li, W.; Chen, J.; Nguyen, M.N.; Tang, E.K.; et al. 20-hydroxyvitamin D2 is a noncalcemic analog of vitamin D with potent antiproliferative and prodifferentiation activities in normal and malignant cells. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2011, 300, C526–C541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Carlberg, C.; Seuter, S. A genomic perspective on vitamin D signaling. Anticancer Res. 2009, 29, 3485–3493. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  72. Piotrowska, A.; Wierzbicka, J.; Żmijewski, M.A. Vitamin D in the skin physiology and pathology. Acta. Biochim. Pol. 2016, 63, 17–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Hansen, C.M.; Madsen, M.W.; Arensbak, B.; Skak-Nielsen, T.; Latini, S.; Binderup, L. Down-regulation of laminin-binding integrins by 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in human melanoma cells in vitro. Cell Adhes. Commun. 1998, 5, 109–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Evans, S.R.; Houghton, A.M.; Schumaker, L.; Brenner, R.V.; Buras, R.R.; Davoodi, F.; Nauta, R.J.; Shabahang, M. Vitamin D receptor and growth inhibition by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in human malignant melanoma cell lines. J. Surg. Res. 1996, 61, 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Essa, S.; Denzer, N.; Mahlknecht, U.; Klein, R.; Collnot, E.M.; Schäfer, U.; Tilgen, W.; Reichrath, J. VDR microrna expression and epigenetic silencing of vitamin D signaling in melanoma cells. J. Steroid Biochem. 2010, 121, 110–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Krishnan, A.V.; Peehl, D.M.; Feldman, D. The role of vitamin D in prostate cancer. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2003, 164, 205–221. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  77. Seifert, M.; Rech, M.; Meineke, V.; Tilgen, W.; Reichrath, J. Differential biological effects of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 on melanoma cell lines in vitro. J. Steroid Biochem. 2004, 89–90, 375–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Corcoran, A.; Nadkarni, S.; Yasuda, K.; Sakaki, T.; Brown, G.; Kutner, A.; Marcinkowska, E. Biological evaluation of double point modified analogues of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D2 as potential anti-leukemic agents. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Nadkarni, S.; Chodyński, M.; Krajewski, K.; Cmoch, P.; Marcinkowska, E.; Brown, G.; Kutner, A. Convergent synthesis of double point modified analogs of 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D2 for biological evaluation. J. Steroid Biochem. 2016, 164, 45–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Trochoutsou, A.I.; Kloukina, V.; Samitas, K.; Xanthou, G. Vitamin-D in the immune system: Genomic and non-genomic actions. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2015, 15, 953–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Doroudi, M.; Plaisance, M.C.; Boyan, B.D.; Schwartz, Z. Membrane actions of 1α,25(OH)2D3 are mediated by Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II in bone and cartilage cells. J. Steroid Biochem. 2015, 145, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Chen, J.; Doroudi, M.; Cheung, J.; Grozier, A.L.; Schwartz, Z.; Boyan, B.D. Plasma membrane PDIA3 and VDR interact to elicit rapid responses to 1α,25OH2D3. Cell. Signal. 2013, 25, 2362–2373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Slominski, A.T.; Kim, T.K.; Takeda, Y.; Janjetovic, Z.; Brozyna, A.A.; Skobowiat, C.; Wang, J.; Postlethwaite, A.; Li, W.; Tuckey, R.C.; et al. RORα and ROR γ are expressed in human skin and serve as receptors for endogenously produced noncalcemic 20-hydroxy-and 20,23-dihydroxyvitamin D. FASEB J. 2014, 28, 2775–2789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Bikle, D.D.; Jiang, Y.; Nguyen, T.; Oda, Y.; Tu, C.L. Disruption of vitamin D and calcium signaling in keratinocytes predisposes to skin cancer. Front Physiol. 2016, 7, 296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Slominski, A.T.; Zmijewski, M.A.; Plonka, P.M.; Szaflarski, J.P.; Paus, R. How UV light touches the brain and endocrine system through skin, and why. Endocrinology 2018, 159, 1992–2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Wyatt, C.; Lucas, R.M.; Hurst, C.; Kimlin, M.G. Vitamin D deficiency at melanoma diagnosis is associated with higher breslow thickness. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0126394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 19 02583 g001 550
Figure 1. Chemical structure of vitamin D3 analogs: 1,25(OH)2D3 (A), 25(OH)D3 (B), calcipotriol (C) and 21(OH)pD (D).
Figure 1. Chemical structure of vitamin D3 analogs: 1,25(OH)2D3 (A), 25(OH)D3 (B), calcipotriol (C) and 21(OH)pD (D).
Ijms 19 02583 g001
Ijms 19 02583 g002 550
Figure 2. Effects of 1,25(OH)2D3, 25(OH)D3, calcipotriol and 21(OH)pD on growth of human SK-MEL-188b, A375 and WM98 melanoma cells. Cells were seeded into 96-well plates and incubated in a medium supplemented with serial dilution of vitamin D analogs from 0.01 nM to 1000 nM concentration (as described in Material and Methods). The statistical significance of results has been analyzed using one-way ANOVA (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) and data are presented as means ± SEM for at least three independent measurements. The cutoff point of significance was defined as p < 0.05 (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001).
Figure 2. Effects of 1,25(OH)2D3, 25(OH)D3, calcipotriol and 21(OH)pD on growth of human SK-MEL-188b, A375 and WM98 melanoma cells. Cells were seeded into 96-well plates and incubated in a medium supplemented with serial dilution of vitamin D analogs from 0.01 nM to 1000 nM concentration (as described in Material and Methods). The statistical significance of results has been analyzed using one-way ANOVA (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) and data are presented as means ± SEM for at least three independent measurements. The cutoff point of significance was defined as p < 0.05 (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001).
Ijms 19 02583 g002
Ijms 19 02583 g003 550
Figure 3. Differences in mRNA level of VDR, PDIA3, CYP27A1 and CYP27B1 genes in SK-MEL-188b cells in comparison with A375 and WM98 cells. Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used as a reporter gene to normalize all samples. See Table S1 for primer sequences and the predicted length of PCR fragments.
Figure 3. Differences in mRNA level of VDR, PDIA3, CYP27A1 and CYP27B1 genes in SK-MEL-188b cells in comparison with A375 and WM98 cells. Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used as a reporter gene to normalize all samples. See Table S1 for primer sequences and the predicted length of PCR fragments.
Ijms 19 02583 g003
Ijms 19 02583 g004 550
Figure 4. Vitamin D analogs treatment modulate the expression of (A) retinoid X receptor (RXR), (E) disulfide isomerase (PDIA3), 25-hydoxylases ((B) CYP27A1, (C) CYP2R1 or (F) CYP3A4, (G) 1α-hydroxylase (CYP27B1)) and 24-hydroxylases ((D) CYP24A1 or (H) CYP24SV) in WM98 melanoma cell line. Cells were stimulated with 1 µM 1,25(OH)2D3, 25(OH)D3 or calcipotriol for 24 h. Quantitative PCR analyses were performed as described in Materials and Methods. Statistical significance was estimated using t-test and data are presented as means ± SD (n = 3). The cutoff point for significance is defined as p < 0.05 (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Figure 4. Vitamin D analogs treatment modulate the expression of (A) retinoid X receptor (RXR), (E) disulfide isomerase (PDIA3), 25-hydoxylases ((B) CYP27A1, (C) CYP2R1 or (F) CYP3A4, (G) 1α-hydroxylase (CYP27B1)) and 24-hydroxylases ((D) CYP24A1 or (H) CYP24SV) in WM98 melanoma cell line. Cells were stimulated with 1 µM 1,25(OH)2D3, 25(OH)D3 or calcipotriol for 24 h. Quantitative PCR analyses were performed as described in Materials and Methods. Statistical significance was estimated using t-test and data are presented as means ± SD (n = 3). The cutoff point for significance is defined as p < 0.05 (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Ijms 19 02583 g004
Ijms 19 02583 g005 550
Figure 5. Effects of vitamin D compounds (1,25(OH)2D3, 21(OH)pD or calcipotriol) on RXR (A), VDR (B), PDIA3 (C), CYP3A4 (D), CYP2R1 (E), CYP27B1 (F), CYP24A1 (G) and CYP11A1 (H) genes expression in A375 melanoma cells. A375 melanoma cells were incubated with 100 nM of 1,25(OH)2D3, 21(OH)pD or calcipotriol for 24 h. mRNA levels were measured by qPCR. Data are shown as means ± S.D of three independent experiments carried out in duplicate. The cutoff point for significance is defined as p < 0.05 (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
Figure 5. Effects of vitamin D compounds (1,25(OH)2D3, 21(OH)pD or calcipotriol) on RXR (A), VDR (B), PDIA3 (C), CYP3A4 (D), CYP2R1 (E), CYP27B1 (F), CYP24A1 (G) and CYP11A1 (H) genes expression in A375 melanoma cells. A375 melanoma cells were incubated with 100 nM of 1,25(OH)2D3, 21(OH)pD or calcipotriol for 24 h. mRNA levels were measured by qPCR. Data are shown as means ± S.D of three independent experiments carried out in duplicate. The cutoff point for significance is defined as p < 0.05 (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
Ijms 19 02583 g005
Ijms 19 02583 g006 550
Figure 6. (A) Five different PCR primers sets were designed (Pr 1–Pr 5) in order to detect the expression of VDR splicing variants in WM98, A375 and SK-MEL-188b cell lines. The most common isoforms are a b and c and the rarely identified isoforms are d, e, f and g. The positions of sets of primers designed to differentiate VDR isoforms is also shown. Product 1 (Pr 1) of 132 b.p. is characteristic for isoforms a, b, c and f; Product 2 (Pr 2) of 180 b.p. is universal for all isoforms accept f; Product 3 (Pr 3) of 386 b.p. is unique for isoform a; Product 4 (Pr 4), depending on length of the PCR fragment, indicates isoform “b” 532 b.p. or “c” 410 b.p.; Product 5 (Pr 5) of 384 b.p. is characteristic for isoforms a, b, c, d and e, but not g and f (diagram of VDR splicing variants taken from AceView https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/IEB/Research/Acembly/). (B) Semiquntitative PCR was used to differentiate the VDR isoforms (see Material and Methods for details); molecular weight marker (M) as described in. (C) Effects of vitamin D analogs on the expression of VDR isoforms were analyzed in WM98 melanoma cells. Melanoma cells were treated with 25(OH)D3 or calcipotriol at 1 µM concentration for 24 h. Statistical significance was estimated using t-test and data are presented as means ± SD (n = 3). The cutoff point for significance is defined as p < 0.05 (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
Figure 6. (A) Five different PCR primers sets were designed (Pr 1–Pr 5) in order to detect the expression of VDR splicing variants in WM98, A375 and SK-MEL-188b cell lines. The most common isoforms are a b and c and the rarely identified isoforms are d, e, f and g. The positions of sets of primers designed to differentiate VDR isoforms is also shown. Product 1 (Pr 1) of 132 b.p. is characteristic for isoforms a, b, c and f; Product 2 (Pr 2) of 180 b.p. is universal for all isoforms accept f; Product 3 (Pr 3) of 386 b.p. is unique for isoform a; Product 4 (Pr 4), depending on length of the PCR fragment, indicates isoform “b” 532 b.p. or “c” 410 b.p.; Product 5 (Pr 5) of 384 b.p. is characteristic for isoforms a, b, c, d and e, but not g and f (diagram of VDR splicing variants taken from AceView https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/IEB/Research/Acembly/). (B) Semiquntitative PCR was used to differentiate the VDR isoforms (see Material and Methods for details); molecular weight marker (M) as described in. (C) Effects of vitamin D analogs on the expression of VDR isoforms were analyzed in WM98 melanoma cells. Melanoma cells were treated with 25(OH)D3 or calcipotriol at 1 µM concentration for 24 h. Statistical significance was estimated using t-test and data are presented as means ± SD (n = 3). The cutoff point for significance is defined as p < 0.05 (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
Ijms 19 02583 g006
Ijms 19 02583 g007 550
Figure 7. Effects of vitamin D analogs: (A) 1,25(OH)2D3, (B) calcipotriol or (C) 21(OH)pD3 at 0 (C—control), 0.01, 0.1 or 1 μM concentrations on VDR translocation to the nucleus (green fluorescence shown in a gray scale). Melanoma A375 cells were transduced using pLenti-CMV-VDR-GFP-pgkpuro construct: see Materials and Methods. Vitamin D analogs except 21(OH)pD induce VDR translocation to the nucleus after 1 h of incubation in a concentration-dependent manner. Each panel shows four random micrographs for each concentration taken by fluorescent microscope under 100× magnification.
Figure 7. Effects of vitamin D analogs: (A) 1,25(OH)2D3, (B) calcipotriol or (C) 21(OH)pD3 at 0 (C—control), 0.01, 0.1 or 1 μM concentrations on VDR translocation to the nucleus (green fluorescence shown in a gray scale). Melanoma A375 cells were transduced using pLenti-CMV-VDR-GFP-pgkpuro construct: see Materials and Methods. Vitamin D analogs except 21(OH)pD induce VDR translocation to the nucleus after 1 h of incubation in a concentration-dependent manner. Each panel shows four random micrographs for each concentration taken by fluorescent microscope under 100× magnification.
Ijms 19 02583 g007

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wasiewicz, T.; Piotrowska, A.; Wierzbicka, J.; Slominski, A.T.; Zmijewski, M.A. Antiproliferative Activity of Non-Calcemic Vitamin D Analogs on Human Melanoma Lines in Relation to VDR and PDIA3 Receptors. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2583. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19092583

AMA Style

Wasiewicz T, Piotrowska A, Wierzbicka J, Slominski AT, Zmijewski MA. Antiproliferative Activity of Non-Calcemic Vitamin D Analogs on Human Melanoma Lines in Relation to VDR and PDIA3 Receptors. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2018; 19(9):2583. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19092583

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wasiewicz, Tomasz, Anna Piotrowska, Justyna Wierzbicka, Andrzej T. Slominski, and Michal A. Zmijewski. 2018. "Antiproliferative Activity of Non-Calcemic Vitamin D Analogs on Human Melanoma Lines in Relation to VDR and PDIA3 Receptors" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19, no. 9: 2583. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19092583

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop