Next Article in Journal
Home-Processed Red Beetroot (Beta vulgaris L.) Products: Changes in Antioxidant Properties and Bioaccessibility
Next Article in Special Issue
An Efficient, Versatile, and Safe Access to Supported Metallic Nanoparticles on Porous Silicon with Ionic Liquids
Previous Article in Journal
Activation of DNA Damage Response Induced by the Kaposi’s Sarcoma-Associated Herpes Virus
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Eco-Friendly Ultrasound-Assisted Synthesis of Novel Fluorinated Pyridinium Salts-Based Hydrazones and Antimicrobial and Antitumor Screening
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 17
Issue 6
10.3390/ijms17060860
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Influence of Ionic Liquids on an Iron(III) Catalyzed Three-Component Coupling/Hydroarylation/Dehydrogenation Tandem Reaction

by
Maren Muntzeck
and
René Wilhelm
*
Department of Chemistry, University of Paderborn, Warburgerstr. 100, Paderborn 33098, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17(6), 860; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17060860
Submission received: 30 March 2016 / Revised: 1 May 2016 / Accepted: 13 May 2016 / Published: 1 June 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ionic Liquids 2016 and Selected Papers from ILMAT III)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A three-component oxidative dehydrogenation tandem reaction via the coupling and hydroarylation of benzaldehyde, aniline and phenylacetylene to a quinoline derivate was catalyzed by an iron-containing ionic liquid. The reaction was air mediated and could be performed under neat conditions. The iron(III) of the ionic liquid was the oxidizing species.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Ionic liquids (ILs), which are salts that have, per definition, a melting point below 100 °C, have attracted much interest in recent years as novel solvents for reactions and electrochemical processes [1]. Several of these liquids can be considered to be “green solvents” [2]. An additional advantage is the efficient recovery of some of these salts. However, for a few examples it is also known that certain ILs are not inert and react with some reagents [3,4,5]. The range of ILs based on various combinations of cations and anions has dramatically increased, and new salts [1,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13] are continuously being reported. In the 1960s ILs were prepared from organic cations and chloroaluminate anions [14]. Since AlCl3 was present in these liquids, the latter were also used as catalysts in Lewis acid–catalyzed reactions. In addition, many of the ILs developed in the 1990s, which incorporated relatively inert lipophilic anions, have been used as solvents for catalytic reactions [15,16,17,18,19]. However, it is also known that these ILs are capable of catalyzing reactions, either in substoichiometric amounts or as reaction media due to stronger interactions with the reaction partners compared to some standard solvents [20].
Next to ionic liquids incorporating chloroaluminate anions, other metal-containing ionic liquids are known [21]. Especially metallic ionic liquids such as [BMIM][FeCl4] seem to have good properties for oxidative reactions. This type of ionic liquid can work as a Lewis acid and as an oxidant at the same time. There are examples known where [BMIM]Cl in combination with FeCl3 is successfully used for the oxidative desulfurization of fuels [22,23]. With [FeCl4]−-based ionic liquids oxidations of organic halides to aldehydes and ketones were also performed. The IL was used in substoichiometric amounts with H5IO6 as the oxidation agent [24]. However, tetrachloroferrate-based ionic liquids have been mainly used in reactions as Lewis acidic solvents [25].
Due to our interest in ionic liquids [4,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34], we wanted to explore the catalytic oxidative behavior of tetrachloroferrate-based ionic liquids in the synthesis of a quinoline derivate. Quinoline derivates and quinoline itself are important structural units in a variety of biologically active natural products. They are also necessary starting materials for the chemical and pharmaceutical industry [35,36,37]. One of the most common methods for creating quinolines is the Friedländer reaction. It is based on an aldol condensation of 2-aminobenzaldehydes. Due to the instability of 2-aminobenzaldehydes, these are generated in situ by the reduction of 2-nitrobenzaldehyde derivatives, which are not readily available [38,39,40,41]. Therefore, the development of quinoline syntheses has attracted increasing attention and has been studied by several groups over the last years. Especially synthetic methods based on the use of transition metal catalysts showed good results as they can give the desired products in a simple one-step reaction with easily available starting materials [42,43,44,45,46,47]. Furthermore, there are some examples of the synthesis of quinolines using different iron salt–based catalysts [48,49,50]. Iron salts are a promising catalyst for a variety of reactions and iron is outstanding due to its non-toxicity, low price and environmentally friendly features [51].

2. Results

We chose the reaction of benzaldehyde 1 with aniline 2 and phenylacetylene 3 to 2,4-diphenylquinoline 4 as the model reaction. The results are summarized in Table 1. First only FeCl3·6H2O was applied as the catalyst under an atmosphere of air in toluene. The reaction time was 24 h and the reaction temperature was 110 °C.
The hexahydrate salt of iron(III) chloride was chosen since many ionic liquids are known to be hygroscopic and contain some amounts of water [1]. These conditions gave a baseline for the further reactions. Next, several ionic liquids were applied in the catalytic reaction. The used ionic liquids, depicted in Scheme 1, were 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrachloroferrate [BMIM][FeCl4] 5, 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium heptachlorodiferrate [BMIM][Fe2Cl7] 6, tetrabutylphosphonium tetrachloroferrate [TBP][FeCl4] 7, tetrabutylphosphonium heptachlorodiferrate [TBP][Fe2Cl7] 8, trihexyl(tetradecyl)phosphonium tetrachloroferrate [THTDP][FeCl4] 9, trihexyl(tetradecyl)phosphonium heptachlorodiferrate [THTDP][Fe2Cl7] 10, trihexyl(tetradecyl)phosphonium chloride with 1.5 eq. FeCl3 11, bis-trihexyl(tetradecyl)phosphonium tetrachlorocuprate [THTDP]2[CuCl4] 12, trihexyl(tetradecyl)phosphonium trichlorocuprate [THTDP][CuCl3] 13 and trihexyl(tetradecyl)phosphonium chloride [THTDP]Cl 14.
The focus of the presented work was on ILs with [FeCl4] as the anion; however, two copper-based ILs were also explored. First, ILs with an anion-to-cation ratio of 1:1 were applied. None of these ILs 5–7 (Table 1, entries 2–4) supported the reaction. Hence, the metal content was changed to a ratio of 2:1 (FeCl3 to IL). The best result was achieved by using [TBP][Fe2Cl7] 9 which gave the product in 62% yield (Table 1, entry 8). The other ILs with a higher iron content gave yields of 53% ([THTDP][Fe2Cl7] 10) and 44% ([BMIM][Fe2Cl7] 8) (Table 1, entries 5 and 9). Neat reaction conditions at 130 °C with compound 8 as the catalyst resulted in a low yield of 16% (Table 1, entry 7).
For the further experiments, the focus was directed on the reaction with [THTDP] iron salts as catalysts, due to their low viscosity. With [THTDP][Fe2Cl7] 10 and 1,2-dichloroethane as the solvent at 85 °C, a yield of 50% was obtained (Table 1, entry 10). Under neat reaction conditions with [THTDP][Fe2Cl7] 10 as the catalyst, a yield of 30% was found (Table 1, entry 11). The use of a higher reaction temperature at 130 °C in combination with neat conditions raised the yield to 38% (Table 1, entry 12). Next, the system was investigated by performing the reaction in a microwave oven. Under neat reaction conditions and 110 °C for 10 min (150 W), a yield of 41% was obtained (Table 1, entry 13). With the achieved results so far, it was concluded that the ratio of the metal ion to the cation has an important influence. Therefore, another ionic liquid with an anion-to-cation ratio in between the two investigated ranges was applied in the reaction. This ionic liquid consisted of 1.5 equivalents iron trichloride to one equivalent [THTDP]Cl 14. The reaction was performed in toluene and 1,2-dichloroethane. In toluene at 110 °C, a yield of 48% was obtained while the reaction in 1,2-dichloroethane at 85 °C gave a yield of 38% (Table 1, entries 14–15). The change of the reaction time to 14 h in toluene lowered the yield to 38% (Table 1, entry 16). Under neat conditions, the yield of the reaction was 36% (Table 1, entry 17). Raising the temperature to 130 °C under neat conditions did not improve the yield (31%) (Table 1, entry 18). Under microwave conditions, a yield of 10% was obtained after 10 min (Table 1, entry 20). Prolonging the reaction time to 20 min changed the yield to 43% (Table 1, entry 19). In addition, an experiment was performed with the metal-free IL [THTDP]Cl 14. As expected, the reaction failed in the absence of iron (Table 1, entry 21). Furthermore, the reaction was investigated with copper salts; however, no desired product could be isolated (Table 1, entries 22–24).

3. Discussion

The examined reaction depends on the transition metal catalyst. No reactions were observed when copper catalysts were tested in place of iron analogs. The iron(III) functioned as a Lewis acid and as an oxidant. Taking the result with iron(III) chloride hexahydrate and the literature results by Tu et al. [48] into account, it can be concluded that the reaction’s performance in the presence of water is not as good as in the absence of water. Ionic liquids are known to always contain a certain amount of water so the reaction yield may be lowered by this fact [1]. However, due to the fact that the first step of the reaction is the formation of an imine species T (Scheme 2), water is formed during the reaction. The imine was present after the reaction and was also isolated; hence, the imine formation was not the limiting parameter in the reaction. A yield of 53% was achieved when iron(III) chloride hexahydrate was used under an atmosphere of air. By using [TBP][Fe2Cl7] 9 the yield was increased to 62%. The three different cations investigated differed strongly in their structure. The [BMIM] cations are known to change to less stable mesomeric structures that can build complexes with metalates [52,53]. Furthermore, [BMIM] cations are less stable because of this change in their structure and are more likely to react under harsh reaction conditions. In addition, [BMIM] cations can be activated at the C(2)–H bond. The other two cations applied differ in their chain length. Both cations contain phosphorus, but the [TBP] cation has shorter chains and is more symmetrical than the [THTDP] cation. Therefore, [TBP][Fe2Cl7] 9 is less lipophilic than [THTDP][Fe2Cl7] 10.
The reaction did not give the desired product when the ionic liquids were used with FeCl3 in a ratio of 1:1. This can be explained considering the possible reaction mechanism. A tentative mechanism for the reaction is shown in Scheme 2 [48]. As mentioned before, in the first step benzaldehyde 1 forms with aniline 2 an imine T in situ through a condensation reaction. The Lewis acidic iron(III) coordinates with this imine T and phenylacetylene 3 to form intermediate X. The propargylamine Y is formed through the addition of acetylene 3 to the imine T. It forms the dihydroquinoline intermediate Z by performing an intermolecular hydroarylation. Z is oxidized by iron(III) which is reduced to iron(II) in this process. The iron(III) species is regenerated by oxygen in the air atmosphere. This mechanism is based on the equilibrium of the [Fe2Cl7] anion, which is shown in Scheme 3.
As can be seen in Scheme 2, iron(III) is acting as a Lewis acid and coordinates the reagents. At the same time, an iron(III) species is used as an oxidant. Furthermore, free FeCl3 with an accessible coordination side is necessary. Therefore, an excess of iron trichloride is needed. This theory is based on the experiments with [THTDP]/1.5 FeCl3 as a catalyst, which gave lower yields than [THTDP][Fe2Cl7] 10. It is possible that in the oxidation step, iron(III) is the oxidant. It is also possible that oxygen from the air is acting directly as the oxidant. We base our first assumption on the fact that the reaction solution turns from a yellow shade that is most likely from the iron(III) salt to a green color which is characteristic of iron(II) salts. The ionic liquid changes its color back to yellow when it is stored in air. Through this, it will be possible to reuse the ionic liquid for further reactions. The fact that [FeCl4]−-based ILs gave no yields whatsoever can be attributed to the fact that an equilibrium between FeCl3 + [Cl] and tetrachloroferrate is far on the latter side. Hence, FeCl3 is not present in sufficient amounts with a free coordination site on the iron(III) center.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. General Methods

The [BMIM][FeCl4] 5 [54] and [BMIM][Fe2Cl7] 6 [55] were prepared according to the literature from [BMIM]Cl which was purchased from commercial sources. The [TBP][FeCl4] 7 [56] and [TBP][Fe2Cl7] 8 were prepared according to the literature from [TBP]Cl which was purchased from commercial sources. The [THTDP][FeCl4] 9 [57], [THTDP][Fe2Cl7] 10, [THTDP]Cl/1.5 FeCl3 11, [THTDP]2[CuCl4] 12 and [THTDP][CuCl3] 13 were prepared according to literature from [THTDP]Cl which was purchased from commercial sources. All of the other reagents were commercially available and used as supplied without further purification. Solvents were either employed as purchased or dried according to procedures described in the literature. IR spectra were recorded on a Bruker VERTEX 70 FT-IR spectrometer. The 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR spectra were recorded at 500 MHz or 125 MHz on a Bruker Avance 500 spectrometer using the deuterated solvent as the lock and the residual solvent or TMS as the internal reference. Mass spectra were obtained on a Bruker Esquire 3000 plus mass spectrometer (Bruker-Franzen Analytik GmbH, Bremen, Germany) equipped with an ESI interface and an ion trap analyzer. High-resolution mass spectra (ESI) were recorded on a Waters Quadrupole-ToF Synapt 2G. The reactions were followed by thin layer chromatography on silica gel precoated plates (Merck TLC silica gel F254). Column chromatography was performed using silica gel 60.

4.2. General Experimental for the Preparation of 2,4-Diphenylquinoline 4

Benzaldehyde 1 (106 mg, 0.101 mL, 1.0 mmol), aniline 2 (98 mg, 0.096 mL, 1.05 mmol), phenylacetylene 3 (153 mg, 0.165 mL, 1.5 mmol) and [THTDP][Fe2Cl7] 10 (83 mg, 0.1 mmol) were added to a 10 mL flask under an atmosphere of air. After toluene (1 mL) was added, the reaction mixture was stirred at 110 °C for 24 h. Afterwards the reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature. The purification was performed by flash chromatography (petroleum ether/AcOEt = 20:1) to afford 4 (136 mg, 50% yield). 1H-NMR(CDCl3, 500 MHz, ppm): δ 8.31–8.29 (d, J = 10 Hz, 1 H), 8.25–8.24 (m, 2 H), 7.95–7.93 (d, J = 10 Hz, 1 H), 7.86 (s, 1 H), 7.78–7.75 (m, 1 H), 7.60–7.48 (m, 9 H); 13C-NMR(CDCl3, 125 MHz, ppm): δ 156.8, 149.1, 148.8, 139.6, 138.4, 130.1, 129.5, 129.4, 129.3, 128.8, 128.5, 128.4, 127.6, 126.3, 125.8, 125.6, 119.3 (Figure S1). The spectral data of the product was consistent with literature values [48].

4.3. Preparation of Metallic Ionic Liquids

1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrachloroferrate [BMIM][FeCl4] 5: [BMIM]Cl (1 g, 5.8 mmol) and FeCl3·6H2O (1.56 g, 5.8 mmol) were stirred at RT for 30 min in a 10 mL round bottom flask. The developing water phase was separated and the ionic liquid was dried for three days under vacuum. [BMIM][FeCl4] 5 was obtained as viscous brown oil (1.95 g, 5.8 mmol, 100%).
1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium heptachlorodiferrate [BMIM][Fe2Cl7] 6: [BMIM]Cl (0.5 g, 2.9 mmol) and FeCl3·6H2O (1.56 g, 5.8 mmol) were stirred at RT for 30 min in a 10 mL round bottom flask. The developing water phase was separated and the ionic liquid was dried for three days under vacuum. [BMIM][Fe2Cl7] 6 was obtained as viscous brown oil (1.45 g, 2.9 mmol, 100%).
Tetrabutylphosphonium tetrachloroferrate [TBP][FeCl4] 7: [TBP]Cl (1.7 g, 5.8 mmol) and FeCl3·6H2O (1.56 g, 5.8 mmol) were stirred at RT for 30 min in a 10 mL round bottom flask. The developing water phase was separated and the ionic liquid was dried for three days under vacuum. [TBP][FeCl4] 7 was obtained as yellow powder (2.65 g, 5.8 mmol, 100%). IR: ν (cm−1): 2963, 2931, 2876, 1464, 1404, 1381, 1231, 1188, 1100, 1006, 968, 918, 812, 713 (Figure S2).
Tetrabutylphosphonium heptachlorodiferrate [TBP][Fe2Cl7] 8: [TBP]Cl (0.85 g, 2.9 mmol) and FeCl3·6H2O (1.56 g, 5.8 mmol) were stirred at RT for 30 min in a 10 mL round bottom flask. The developing water phase was separated and the ionic liquid was dried for three days under vacuum. [TBP][Fe2Cl7] 8 was obtained as yellow powder (1.8 g, 2.9 mmol, 100%). IR: ν (cm−1): 2964, 2932, 2876, 1464, 1404, 1381, 1229, 1188, 1100, 1004, 969, 918, 812, 713 (Figure S3).
Trihexyl(tetradecyl)phosphonium tetrachloroferrate [THTDP][FeCl4] 9: [THTDP]Cl (3 g, 5.8 mmol) and FeCl3·6H2O (1.56 g, 5.8 mmol) were stirred at RT for 30 min in a 10 mL round bottom flask. The developing water phase was separated and the ionic liquid was dried for three days under vacuum. [THTDP][FeCl4] 9 was obtained as yellow oil (3.95 g, 5.8 mmol, 100%). IR (KBr): ν (cm−1): 2922, 2852, 1458, 1408, 1377, 1215, 1111, 987, 862, 810, 719 (Figure S4).
Trihexyl(tetradecyl)phosphonium heptachlorodiferrat [THTDP][Fe2Cl7] 10: [THTDP]Cl (1.5 g, 2.9 mmol) and FeCl3·6H2O (1.56 g, 5.8 mmol) were stirred at RT for 30 min in a 10 mL round bottom flask. The developing water phase was separated and the ionic liquid was dried for three days under vacuum. [THTDP][Fe2Cl7] 10 was obtained as yellow oil (2.45 g, 2.9 mmol, 100%). IR: ν (cm−1): 2922, 2852, 1458, 1408, 1377, 1216, 1111, 987, 862, 811, 719 (Figure S5).
Trihexyl(tetradecyl)phosphonium chloride with 1.5 eq. FeCl3 11: [THTDP]Cl (3 g, 5.8 mmol) and FeCl3·6H2O (2.35 g, 8.7 mmol) were stirred at RT for 30 min in a 10 mL round bottom flask. The developing water phase was separated and the ionic liquid was dried for three days under vacuum. The IL was obtained as yellow oil (4.41 g, 5.8 mmol, 100%). IR: ν (cm−1): 2922, 2852, 1457, 1408, 1378, 1215, 1111, 987, 862, 811, 718 (Figure S6).
The spectral data of the ionic liquids were consistent with literature [54,55,56,57] values.
Bis-trihexyl(tetradecyl)phosphonium tetrachlorocuprate [THTDP]2[CuCl4] 12: [THTDP]Cl (6 g, 11.6 mmol) and CuCl2 (0.78 g, 5.8 mmol) were stirred at RT for 30 min in a 10 mL round bottom flask. The developing water phase was separated and the ionic liquid was dried for three days under vacuum. [THTDP]2[CuCl4] 12 was obtained as viscous red-brown oil (6.78 g, 5.8 mmol, 100%). IR (KBr): ν (cm−1): 2922, 2852, 1458, 1408, 1377, 1215, 1111, 987, 862, 810, 719 (Figure S7).
Trihexyl(tetradecyl)phosphonium trichlorocuprate [THTDP][CuCl3] 13: [THTDP]Cl (3 g, 5.8 mmol) and CuCl2 (0.78 g, 5.8 mmol) were stirred at RT for 30 min in a 10 mL round bottom flask. The developing water phase was separated and the ionic liquid was dried for three days under vacuum. [THTDP][CuCl3] 13 was obtained as viscous red-brown oil (3.59 g, 5.8 mmol, 100%). IR: ν (cm−1): 2922, 2852, 1458, 1407, 1378, 1215, 1111, 986, 862, 720 (Figure S8).

5. Conclusions

In the presented work the influence of ionic liquids on an iron trichloride–catalyzed oxidative tandem and hydroarylation reaction of benzaldehyde 1, aniline 2 and phenylacetylene 3 was investigated. It was possible to use an iron-containing IL as a catalyst and achieve higher yields compared to iron(III) chloride hexahydrate. In addition, it was shown that the [FeCl4]− species were not able to catalyze the reaction. The reaction could be performed under a normal atmosphere. The iron(III) functions as a Lewis acid and an oxidant. Air is a co-oxidant and regenerates the iron(II) species to iron(III). The studies will allow the development of further reactions with metalate-based ionic liquids as catalysts.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/17/6/860/s1.

Author Contributions

Maren Muntzeck and René Wilhelm conceived and designed the experiments; Maren Muntzeck performed the experiments; Maren Muntzeck analyzed the data; Maren Muntzeck and René Wilhelm wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wasserscheid, P.; Welton, T. Ionic Liquids in Synthesis, 2nd ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2008; Volumes 1–2. [Google Scholar]
  2. Rogers, R.D.; Seddon, K.R. Ionic Liquids as Green Solvents: Progress and Prospects; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 2003; pp. 2–12. [Google Scholar]
  3. Chowdhury, S.; Mohan, R.S.; Scott, J.L. Reactivity of ionic liquids. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 2363–2389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jurčík, V.; Wilhelm, R. An imidazolinium salt as ionic liquid for medium and strong bases. Green Chem. 2005, 7, 844–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dupont, J.; Spencer, J. On the Noninnocent Nature of 1,3-Dialkylimidazolium Ionic Liquids. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 5296–5297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Katritzky, A.R.; Singh, S.; Kirichenko, K.; Holbrey, J.D.; Smiglak, M.; Reichert, W.M.; Rogers, R.D. 1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium 3,5-dinitro-1,2,4-triazolate: A novel ionic liquid containing a rigid, planar energetic anion. Chem. Commun. 2005, 21, 868–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Fukumoto, K.; Yoshizawa, M.; Ohno, H. Room Temperature Ionic Liquids from 20 Natural Amino Acids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 2398–2399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Carter, E.B.; Culver, S.L.; Fox, P.A.; Goode, R.D.; Ntai, I.; Tickell, M.D.; Traylor, R.K.; Hoffman, N.W.; Davis, J.H. Sweet success: Ionic liquids derived from non-nutritive sweeteners. Chem. Commun. 2004, 10, 630–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Keglevich, G.; Baan, Z.; Hermecz, I.; Novak, T.; Odinets, I.L. The Phosphorus Aspects of Green Chemistry: The Use of Quaternary Phosphonium Salts and 1,3-Dialkylimidazolium Hexafluorophosphates in Organic Synthesis. Curr. Org. Chem. 2007, 11, 107–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Steinrück, H.P.; Wasserscheid, P. Ionic Liquids in Catalysis. Catal. Lett. 2015, 145, 380–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Petkovic, M.; Kenneth, K.R.; Rebelo, L.P.N.; Pereira, C.S. Ionic liquids: A pathway to environmental acceptability. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 1383–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Chatel, G.; Pereira, J.F.B.; Debbeti, V.; Wang, H.; Rogers, R.D. Mixing ionic liquids—“simple mixtures” or “double salts”? Green Chem. 2014, 16, 2051–2083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Niedermeyer, H.; Hallett, J.P.; Villar-Garcia, I.J.; Hunt, P.A.; Welton, T. Mixtures of ionic liquids. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 7780–7802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Welton, T. Room-Temperature Ionic Liquids. Solvents for Synthesis and Catalysis. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 2071–2083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhao, D.; Wu, M.; Kou, Y.; Min, E. Ionic liquids: Applications in catalysis. Catal. Today 2002, 74, 157–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Baudequin, C.; Baudoux, J.; Levillain, J.; Cahard, D.; Gaumont, A.C.; Plaquevent, J.C. Ionic liquids and chirality: Opportunities and challenges. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2003, 14, 3081–3093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jain, N.; Kumar, A.; Chauhan, S.; Chauhan, S.M.S. Chemical and biochemical transformations in ionic liquids. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 1015–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Parvulescu, V.I.; Hardacre, C. Catalysis in Ionic Liquids. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 2615–2665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Durand, J.; Teuma, E.; Goez, M. Ionic liquids as a medium for enantioselective catalysis. C. R. Chim. 2007, 10, 152–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sereda, O.; Tabassum, S.; Wilhelm, R. Lewis acid organocatalysts. Top. Curr. Chem. 2010, 291, 349–394. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  21. Estager, J.; Holbrey, J.D.; Swadzba-Kwasny, M. Halometallate ionic liquids—Revisited. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 847–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Li, H.; Zhu, W.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Lub, J.; Yana, Y. Deep oxidative desulfurization of fuels in redox ionic liquids based on iron chloride. Green Chem. 2009, 11, 810–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ko., N.H.; Lee, J.S.; Huh, E.S.; Lee, H.; Jung, K.D.; Kim, H.S.; Cheong, M. Extractive Desulfurization Using Fe-Containing Ionic Liquids. Energy Fuels 2008, 22, 1687–1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hu, Y.L.; Liu, Q.F.; Lu, T.T.; Lu, M. Highly efficient oxidation of organic halides to aldehydes and ketones with H5IO6 in ionic liquid [C12MIM][FeCl4]. Catal. Commun. 2010, 11, 923–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bica, K.; Leder, S.; Gaertner, P. From solvent to sustainable catalysis. Chloroferrate ionic liquids in synthesis. Curr. Organ. Synth. 2011, 8, 824–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jurčík, V.; Wilhelm, R. The preparation of new enantiopure imidazolinium salts and their evaluation as catalysts and shift reagents. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2006, 17, 801–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jurčík, V.; Gilani, M.; Wilhelm, R. Easily accessible chiral imidazolinium salts bearing two hydroxy-containing substituents as shift reagents and carbene precursors. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 2, 5103–5109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Winkel, A.; Wilhelm, R. New Chiral Ionic Liquids Based on Imidazolinium Salts. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2009, 20, 2344–2350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Winkel, A.; Wilhelm, R. New Chiral Ionic Liquids Based on Enantiopure Sulphate and Sulfonate Anions for Chiral Recognition. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 30, 5817–5824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Blanrue, A.; Wilhelm, R. Methylated Imidazolinium-Dithiocarboxylates: Two Representatives of a New Class of Ionic Liquids. Synthesis 2009, 4, 583–586. [Google Scholar]
  31. Jurčík, V.; Wilhelm, R. Imidazolinium salts as catalysts for the aza-Diels-Alder reaction. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2005, 3, 239–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Sereda, O.; Clemens, N.; Heckel, T.; Wilhelm, R. Imidazolinium and amidinium salts as Lewis acid organocatalysts. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2012, 8, 1798–1803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Heckel, T.; Konieczna, D.D.; Wilhelm, R. An Ionic Liquid Solution of Chitosan as Organocatalyst. Catalysts 2013, 3, 914–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Heckel, T.; Winkel, A.; Wilhelm, R. Chiral ionic liquids based on nicotine for the chiral recognition of carboxylic acids. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2013, 24, 1127–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chen, Y.L.; Fang, K.C.; Sheu, J.Y.; Hsu, S.L.; Tzeng, C.C. Synthesis and antibacterial evaluation of certain quinolone derivatives. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 2374–2377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Michael, J.P. Quinoline, quinazoline and acridone alkaloids. Nat. Prod. Rep. 1997, 14, 605–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Solomonov, I.; Osipova, M.; Feldman, Y.; Baehtz, C.; Kjaer, K.; Robinson, I.K.; Webster, G.T.; McNaughton, D.; Wood, B.R.; Weissbuch, I.; et al. Crystal nucleation, growth, andmorphology of the synthetic malaria pigment beta-hematin and the effect thereon by quinoline additives: The malaria pigment as a target of various antimalarial drugs. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 2615–2627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Dormer, P.G.; Eng, K.K.; Farr, R.N.; Humphrey, G.R.; McWilliams, J.C.; Reider, P.J.; Sager, J.W.; Volante, R.P. Highly regioselective Friedlander annulations with unmodified ketones employing novel amine catalysts: Syntheses of 2-substituted quinolines, 1,8-naphthyridines, and related heterocycles. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 467–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Hsiao, Y.; Rivera, N.R.; Yasuda, N.; Hughes, D.L.; Reider, P.J. Highly regioselective Friedlander reaction. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1101–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Hu, Y.Z.; Zhang, D.; Thummel, R.P. Friedlander approach for the incorporation of 6-bromoquinoline into novel chelating ligands. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 2251–2253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. McNaughton, B.R.; Miller, B.L. A mild and efficient one-step synthesis of quinolines. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4257–4259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Cho, H.; Torok, F.; Torok, B. Energy efficiency of heterogeneous catalytic microwave-assisted organic reactions. Green Chem. 2014, 16, 3623–3634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kumar, A.; Rao, V.K. Microwave-Assisted and Yb(OTf)3-Promoted One-Pot Multicomponent Synthesis of Substituted Quinolines in Ionic Liquid. Synlett 2011, 15, 2157–2162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kuninobu, Y.; Inoue, Y.; Takai, K. Copper(I)- and gold(I)-catalyzed synthesis of 2,4-disubstituted quinoline derivatives from N-aryl-2-propynylamines. Chem. Lett. 2007, 36, 1422–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Tang, J.; Wang, L.M.; Mao, D.; Wang, W.B.; Zhang, L.; Wu, S.Y.; Xie, Y.S. Ytterbium pentafluorobenzoate as a novel fluorous Lewis acid catalyst in the synthesis of 2,4-disubstituted quinolines. Tetrahedron 2011, 67, 8465–8469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Xiao, F.P.; Chen, Y.L.; Liu, Y.; Wang, J.B. Sequential catalytic process: Synthesis of quinoline derivatives by AuCl3/CuBr-catalyzed three-component reaction of aldehydes, amines, and alkynes. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 2755–2761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhang, X.; Liu, B.Q.; Shu, X.; Gao, Y.; Lv, H.P.; Zhu, J. Silver-Mediated C-H Activation: Oxidative Coupling/Cyclization of N-Arylimines and Alkynes for the Synthesis of Quinolines. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 501–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Cao, K.; Zhang, F.M.; Tu, Y.Q.; Zhuo, X.T.; Fan, C.A. Iron(III)-Catalyzed and Air-MediatedTandem Reaction of Aldehydes, Alkynes and Amines: An Efficient Approach to Substituted Quinolines. Chem. Eur. J. 2009, 15, 6332–6334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Patil, S.S.; Patil, S.V.; Bobade, V.D. Synthesis of Aminoindolizine and Quinoline Derivatives via Fe(acac)3/TBAOH-Catalyzed Sequential Cross-Coupling-Cycloisomerization Reactions. Synlett 2011, 16, 2379–2383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yao, C.S.; Qin, B.B.; Zhang, H.H.; Lu, J.; Wang, D.L.; Tu, S.J. One-pot solvent-free synthesis of quinolines by C-H activation/C-C Bond formation catalyzed by recyclable iron(III) triflate. RSC Adv. 2012, 2, 3759–3764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bauer, I.; Knolker, H.J. Iron Catalysis in Organic Synthesis. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 3170–3387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Bradley, A.E.; Hatter, J.E.; Nieuwenhuyzen, M.; Pitner, W.R.; Seddon, K.R.; Thied, R.C. Precipitation of a dioxouranium(VI) species from a room temperature ionic liquid medium. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 1692–1694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Oxley, J.D.; Prozorov, T.; Suslick, K.S. Sonochemistry and sonoluminescence of room-temperature ionic liquids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 11138–11139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Bica, K.; Gaertner, P. An iron-containing ionic liquid as recyclable catalyst for aryl grignard cross-coupling of alkyl halides. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 733–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Nguyen, M.D.; Nguyen, L.V.; Jeon, E.H.; Kim, J.H.; Cheong, M.; Kim, H.S.; Lee, J.S. Fe-containing ionic liquids as catalysts for the dimerization of bicyclo[2.2.1]hepta-2,5-diene. J. Catal. 2008, 258, 5–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Vincze, L.; Papp, S. Calculation of Association Constants and Distribution of Contact and Dipolar Interactions for [R3P+R'][FeCl4]− Ion-Pairs. Acta Chim. Hung. 1982, 110, 163–173. [Google Scholar]
  57. Santos, E.; Albo, J.; Rosatella, A.; Afonso, C.A.M.; Irabien, A. Synthesis and characterization of Magnetic Ionic Liquids (MILs) for CO2 separation. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2014, 89, 866–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 17 00860 sch001 1024
Scheme 1. Structures of metallic ionic liquids.
Scheme 1. Structures of metallic ionic liquids.
Ijms 17 00860 sch001
Ijms 17 00860 sch002 1024
Scheme 2. Possible mechanism for the oxidative tandem and hydroarylation reaction of benzaldehyde 1, aniline 2 and phenylacetylene 3.
Scheme 2. Possible mechanism for the oxidative tandem and hydroarylation reaction of benzaldehyde 1, aniline 2 and phenylacetylene 3.
Ijms 17 00860 sch002
Ijms 17 00860 sch003 1024
Scheme 3. Equilibrium of the [Fe2Cl7] anion.
Scheme 3. Equilibrium of the [Fe2Cl7] anion.
Ijms 17 00860 sch003
Table
Table 1. Reaction of benzaldehyde 1, aniline 2 and phenylacetylene 3 to 2,4-phenylquinoline 4. Ijms 17 00860 i001
Table 1. Reaction of benzaldehyde 1, aniline 2 and phenylacetylene 3 to 2,4-phenylquinoline 4. Ijms 17 00860 i001
Entry aCatalystSolventsTimeT [°C]Yield [%] b
1FeCl3·6H2Otoluene24 h11053
2[BMIM][FeCl4] 5toluene24 h110-
3[TBP][FeCl4] 7toluene24 h110-
4[THTDP][FeCl4] 9toluene24 h110-
5[BMIM][Fe2Cl7] 6toluene24 h11044
6[BMIM][Fe2Cl7] 6toluene18 h11040
7[BMIM][Fe2Cl7] 6-24 h13016
8[TBP][Fe2Cl7] 8toluene24 h11062
9[THTDP][Fe2Cl7] 10toluene24 h11054
10[THTDP][Fe2Cl7] 101,2-dichloroethane24 h8550
11[THTDP][Fe2Cl7] 10-24 h11030
12[THTDP][Fe2Cl7] 10-24 h13038
13 c[THTDP][Fe2Cl7] 10-10 min11041
14[THTDP]Cl/1.5 FeCl3 11toluene24 h11048
15[THTDP]Cl/1.5 FeCl3 111,2-dichloroethane24 h8538
16[THTDP]Cl/1.5 FeCl3 11toluene14 h11038
17[THTDP]Cl/1.5 FeCl3 11-24 h11036
18[THTDP]Cl/1.5 FeCl3 11-24 h13031
19 c[THTDP]Cl/1.5 FeCl3 11-20 min11043
20 c[THTDP]Cl/1.5 FeCl3 11-10 min11010
21 c[THTDP]Cl 14-20 min110-
22CuCl2toluene24 h110-
23[THTDP]2[CuCl4] 12toluene24 h110-
24[THTDP][CuCl3] 13toluene24 h110-
a General reaction conditions: benzaldehyde 1 (106 mg, 1 mmol), aniline 2 (98 mg, 1.05 mmol), phenyl acetylene 3 (153 mg, 1.5 mmol), catalyst (0.1 mmol), solvent (1 mL) under an atmosphere of air; b Isolated yields; c Reaction was performed in a microwave oven at 150 W.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Muntzeck, M.; Wilhelm, R. Influence of Ionic Liquids on an Iron(III) Catalyzed Three-Component Coupling/Hydroarylation/Dehydrogenation Tandem Reaction. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 860. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17060860

AMA Style

Muntzeck M, Wilhelm R. Influence of Ionic Liquids on an Iron(III) Catalyzed Three-Component Coupling/Hydroarylation/Dehydrogenation Tandem Reaction. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2016; 17(6):860. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17060860

Chicago/Turabian Style

Muntzeck, Maren, and René Wilhelm. 2016. "Influence of Ionic Liquids on an Iron(III) Catalyzed Three-Component Coupling/Hydroarylation/Dehydrogenation Tandem Reaction" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 17, no. 6: 860. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17060860

APA Style

Muntzeck, M., & Wilhelm, R. (2016). Influence of Ionic Liquids on an Iron(III) Catalyzed Three-Component Coupling/Hydroarylation/Dehydrogenation Tandem Reaction. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 17(6), 860. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17060860

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop