Next Article in Journal
Integrated Biological and Chemical Investigation of Indonesian Marine Organisms Targeting Anti-Quorum-Sensing, Anti-Biofilm, Anti-Biofouling, and Anti-Biocorrosion Activities
Next Article in Special Issue
Polythiophene/Ti3C2TX MXene Composites for Effective Removal of Diverse Organic Dyes via Complementary Activity of Adsorption and Photodegradation
Previous Article in Journal
Enhanced Electrocatalytic Performance of P-Doped MoS2/rGO Composites for Hydrogen Evolution Reactions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Adsorptive–Photocatalytic Composites of α-Ferrous Oxalate Supported on Activated Carbon for the Removal of Phenol under Visible Irradiation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bioethanol Steam Reforming for Hydrogen Production over Ni-Cr/SBA 15: Influence of Metal Loading and Ni/Cr Ratio

by
Pedro J. Megía
1,
Lourdes García-Moreno
1,
Arturo J. Vizcaíno
1,
José A. Calles
1,2,* and
Alicia Carrero
1,2
1
Chemical and Environmental Engineering Group, Rey Juan Carlos University, Tulipán Street s/n, 28933 Móstoles, Madrid, Spain
2
Institute of Sustainable Technologies, Rey Juan Carlos University, Tulipán Street s/n, 28933 Móstoles, Madrid, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2025, 30(6), 1206; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30061206
Submission received: 6 February 2025 / Revised: 4 March 2025 / Accepted: 6 March 2025 / Published: 7 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Heterogeneous Catalysis for Sustainability and Carbon-Neutrality)

Abstract

:
This work examines the influence of metal loading and the Ni/Cr ratio of Ni-Cr/SBA-15 catalysts on bioethanol steam reforming for the first time. The characterization of the synthesized samples reveals that higher Cr amounts result in lower Ni crystallite sizes due to the promoting effect of Cr, thereby enhancing the dispersion of the active phase. The catalytic performance has been evaluated in terms of ethanol conversion and H2 TOF (min−1). Ethanol conversion exhibits an increasing trend with higher Ni content, reaching up to 90% for samples containing 15 wt.%. By increasing the Cr content (lower Ni/Cr ratio) the results evidence a similar trend. A synergistic effect between Ni and Cr was appreciated in conversion values when the Ni content was below 11 wt.% and the Cr content exceeded 2 wt.%, which coincides with a smaller Ni crystallite size. Concerning the H2 TOF, the catalyst with the lowest Ni content (7 wt.%) exhibited a higher value with a notable enhancement upon increasing the Cr loading. However, a considerable decrease in H2 TOF was observed for samples with higher Ni loading. Therefore, the best catalytic performance, achieving nearly complete ethanol conversion and high hydrogen production, was reached when using catalysts with 7 wt.% Ni; the Cr loading should be increased to around 2 wt.%.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Despite hydrogen being considered the energy vector of the future, the cleanness of its production is crucial to ensure this grade and to achieve the so-called Hydrogen Economy [1,2]. Nowadays, hydrogen is mostly produced using fossil fuels like natural gas steam reforming and coal gasification, contributing to global climate change. Moreover, despite fossil fuel prices having receded from their peaks in 2022, markets continue to exhibit tension and volatility [3]. Therefore, the development of new technologies based on renewable sources is a key role for its sustainability [4]. On this basis, numerous studies have focused their attention on an effective and environmentally friendly technology for its production [5].
Hydrogen production from biomass and/or residual wastes could be technically and economically feasible, given the current state of technology in developed countries [6]. In this regard, thermochemical processes are the most effective methods for producing hydrogen-rich gases from biomass [7,8]. More specifically, the steam reforming of biomass derivatives presents more benefits than pyrolysis and gasification from the point of view of production costs [9]. Compared to methane and other hydrocarbons, ethanol steam reforming (ESR) has the potential for widespread availability, low cost, and superior reactivity, which is the reason why it has been deeply studied in the literature [10]. Moreover, ethanol has a high hydrogen content, and, given that it is not toxic, its handling, storage, and transportation are safe [11]. These characteristics enable its distribution in a logistic net close to those used for conventional fuel stations.
ESR is an endothermic process, thus favored at high temperatures, which can be stoichiometrically represented as follows:
CH 3 CH 2 OH + 3 H 2 O     2 CO 2 + 6 H 2
The hydrogen yield is affected not only by the main reaction but also due to other side reactions that can lead to the formation of undesirable intermediated compounds or byproducts, whose prevalence is closely linked to the operating conditions and the design of the catalyst [12,13]. In this respect, Ni-based catalysts have been widely used in the literature because they have demonstrated promising results towards hydrogen selectivity and are cheaper than those based on noble metals. They have shown promising activity to facilitate the C-C and C-H bonds cleavage [14,15,16]. Unfortunately, Ni catalysts present some limitations, including deactivation by coke deposition and/or metal sintering, sensitivity to poisoning, and the lack of selectivity through the formation of undesirable byproducts. Perhaps the most significant drawback of Ni-based catalysts during steam reforming is their tendency to easily form coke deposits over the Ni crystallite surface. These carbon deposits may block active sites on the catalysts, decreasing their efficiency and ultimately causing deactivation, which also results in a decrease in hydrogen production [17,18]. These concerns have driven research into modifications of Ni catalysts, such as the incorporation of a second metal leading to bimetallic formulations to improve their catalytic stability and selectivity [19,20,21,22,23]. In previous works [22,23], we have reported the benefits of adding a second metal to Ni/SBA-15 in the steam reforming of various oxygenated hydrocarbons commonly found in aqueous streams resulting from thermochemical biomass treatments. More specifically, the combination of Ni and Cr, both in the catalyst’s formulation, exhibited higher conversion and hydrogen production when compared to Ni/SBA-15. Moreover, the coke deposited during the reforming reaction was drastically decreased, attributed to the formation of smaller Ni crystallites induced by the presence of Cr. Similarly, Bui et al. [24] evaluated plate Ni-Cr catalysts for the steam reforming of biogas, highlighting the beneficial role of Cr in preventing deactivation via sintering. This effect has also been reported elsewhere for other reforming reactions using Co-based catalysts [25,26]. Additionally, Cr has been employed as a promoter in different catalyst formulations to enhance the dispersion of the active phase, thereby preventing thermal sintering, while also creating oxygen vacancies due to its redox nature [27,28,29]. Rouibah et al. [30] prepared Ni-M (M = Cr, Mn, Co) catalysts for the dry reforming of methane. The presence of Cr in the catalyst formulation not only enhances the catalytic activity but also stabilizes the active Ni phase and potentially reduces coke formation, thus achieving the best catalytic performance. Ramantani et al. [31] studied the incorporation of different transition metals to a Ni-based perovskite, concluding that the presence of Cr not only improved the structural stability but also increased the oxygen vacancies and reduced coke formation in the steam reforming of propane. For their part, Abrokwah et al. [32] studied the effect of Cr and CeO2 addition to Ni/SBA-15 in the steam reforming of glycerol. They concluded that chromium has a dual effect in the glycerol steam reforming since it negatively impacts glycerol conversion and hydrogen selectivity in the short-term time-on-stream but, in the long-term, it significantly enhances the stability of the catalyst by preventing sintering and structural collapse. To our knowledge, there are no studies that have evaluated the Cr content in the catalytic behavior of bimetallic Ni-based catalysts. Furthermore, over the past two decades, the Scopus database shows that less than 15 articles have been published on bimetallic Ni-Cr catalysts for steam reforming, with none of them specifically addressing bioethanol as a feedstock. Therefore, the aim of the present work is the preparation of different Ni-Cr/SBA-15 catalysts with varying metal content and Ni/Cr ratios to optimize their catalytic properties towards hydrogen production in the ESR reaction.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Catalysts Characterization

N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms, displayed in Figure 1A for all the prepared Ni-Cr/SBA-15 catalysts, show a type IV isotherm with an H1-hysteresis loop in all cases. According to the IUPAC, this isotherm model is characteristic of mesoporous materials with hexagonal pore arrangements. This indicates the preservation of the initial SBA-15 structure after the metal incorporation. However, as the metal content increases, some distortion of the porous structure can be assumed from the shape of the isotherm, and less nitrogen is adsorbed, which suggests some loss of porosity given the higher metal content. The pore size distribution obtained using the BJH method is shown in Figure 1B. It seems clear that the pore size distribution curve is narrower when the metal content is the smallest. The peaks are widened as a result of the partial blockage of the mesopores with increasing metal content, thus corroborating some distortion of the porous structure. The textural properties determined from the N2-physisorption isotherms of calcined catalysts are summarized in Table 1 along with other physicochemical properties. As the metal content increases, there is a notable decrease in both the BET surface area and pore volume, even though these values were high for all the samples.
Diffraction patterns of calcined Ni-Cr/SBA-15 catalysts are depicted in Figure 2. Peaks at 2θ = 37.2, 43.3, 63.0, 75.5, and 79.2° corresponding to (111), (200), (220), (311), and (222) planes of the cubic phase of NiO (JCPDS 01-075-0197), respectively, arise in all the samples. No peaks ascribed to any Cr species are possible to be discerned in the calcined catalysts. This observation aligns with results reported by other authors when incorporating Cr as a promoter [35]. This effect could be related to the higher Ni content compared to the Cr content, which can contribute to the lower intensity of Cr-oxides peaks, especially at low loadings, as previously reported [22,26], or because the formation of NiCr2O4 (JCPDS 01-088-0109) spinel, which could not be detected by XRD due to the overlap with the main lines of the NiO pattern. It is noticeable that with an increase in the Ni content in the catalyst, formulation peaks become narrower, highlighting the formation of larger crystallites size. This was verified with the results calculated using the Scherrer equation in the (200) plane of cubic NiO (see Table 1). On the contrary, when the Cr content increases, peaks corresponding to NiO become wider, leading to smaller crystallite sizes. This is in line with that reported in the literature since Cr has been used as a promoter agent to increase dispersion in metal-supported catalysts [36].
TEM images of samples with a 15 wt.% of Ni, varying the Ni/Cr ratio between 2.5 and 7.5, are displayed in Figure 3 to give an overview of the catalyst morphology and active phase dispersion over the SBA-15 support. The micrographs evidence the well-ordered hexagonal array of cylindrical channels characteristic of SBA-15 material, agreeing with the results obtained by N2 physisorption isotherms. Moreover, dark zones can be observed on the mesoporous structure of SBA-15, corresponding to Ni and Cr oxides. As the Ni/Cr ratio decreases, the oxide particles diminish, thereby confirming a higher dispersion of NiO particles in agreement with the mean crystallite sizes calculated from the XRD patterns (see Table 1).
To study the reduction behavior of the oxide species in the calcined catalysts, H2-TPR analyses were performed, as shown in Figure 4. For comparative purposes, the reduction profile of Ni from refs [22,23] has been included in which a single reduction zone with three different features appears at 288, 344, and 447 °C related to NiO particles with varying degrees of interaction with the support. Conversely, in the Ni-Cr samples, two different regions can be distinguished. The first one at lower temperatures (180–210 °C) is related to the reduction in Cr-species to Cr3+ affected by the presence of NiO [37,38,39]. As it can be observed, higher Cr content resulted in an increase in the reduction area for this peak since more Cr species are being reduced. On the other hand, the second reduction zone at higher temperatures (with maxima > 400 °C) is ascribed to the reduction in NiO species with different degrees of interaction with the support to Ni0, as evidenced by different maxima in the reduction profile for each sample [40,41]. A shoulder can be distinguished at temperatures close to 500 °C, which could be related to the spinel NiCr2O4, as reported elsewhere [42,43], where Cr2O3 would be forming part of the mixed oxide having strong interaction with NiO. This feature is more intense when referred to samples with the highest Ni/Cr ratio (7.5) along with the lowest area for the reduction region at low temperatures (180–210 °C). This may indicate that, for these catalysts, Cr is preferably taking part in the spinel.
Finally, as expected, samples with higher Ni metal content resulted in increased H2 consumption, as summarized in Table 2, since more Ni oxide species are available. However, in all the cases, the reducibility ranged between 94 and 99%, indicating that all the samples achieved a similar level of NiO reduction.
Once reduced at 600 °C, all the catalysts were characterized again by XRD measurements. As it can be seen from Figure 5A, no diffraction lines of Ni- or Cr-oxides species can be differentiated. On the one hand, regarding Ni-oxides, the absence of NiO diffraction lines indicates complete reduction during the activation process. Instead, peaks corresponding to the (111), (200), and (220) planes of the cubic phase of the Ni0 pattern (JCPDS 01-071-3740) can be appreciated, showing the reflection at 2θ = 44.5, 51.8, and 74.4°, respectively. On the other hand, the absence of peaks ascribed to Cr0 can be explained by the reducibility of Cr2O3, which is hampered due to its extraordinarily high and negative energy of formation [44]. Accounting for the presence of Cr2O3 peaks, a change in the baseline could be discerned, which could be attributed to the presence of the rhombohedral Cr2O3 crystal system (JCPDS 00-006-0504) at 2θ = 63.4°. Hence, the high dispersion of these species over the SBA-15 support is reaffirmed. Ni0 crystallite sizes were estimated using the Scherrer equation from the diffraction plane (111). The dispersion of the Ni crystallites is displayed in Figure 5B as a function of Ni/Cr ratio and Ni content.
To summarize, as the metallic (Ni+Cr) content increases, the specific surface area of the catalyst decreases. Regarding the Ni0 crystallite size, when the Ni content increases, the crystallite size also increases. By contrast, when the Ni/Cr ratio decreases (higher Cr content), the mean crystallite size decreases. Following these trends, ethanol steam reforming should be favored using catalysts with lower metallic content and lower Ni/Cr ratios to achieve smaller Ni particles, leading to more accessible active sites.

2.2. Ethanol Steam Reforming Tests

The catalytic performance of the prepared catalysts was evaluated in the bioethanol steam reforming reaction through ethanol conversion and TOF, as described in the experimental section. Figure 6 shows the 3D surface distribution for ethanol conversion after 5 h time-on-stream as a function of the Ni and Cr content in wt.%. All the samples reached conversions above 85%. Considering only the Ni content, as it increases, the ethanol conversion also rises, reaching a value close to 90% with a 15 wt.% of Ni. Similarly, the ethanol conversion increases with the Cr content, ascribed to higher Ni dispersion. It is possible to observe a region in which the ethanol conversion is almost complete when the Ni content is below 11 wt.% and the Cr content is above 2 wt.%. This area perfectly aligns with the zone with smaller Ni crystallite sizes represented in Figure 5B. According to what is reported in the literature, lower crystallite sizes may lead to better catalytic performance [45]. In line with this, Gupta et al. [46] studied the effect of the metal amount over Ni/Al2O3 catalysts in the tri-reforming of methane, concluding that catalytic performance was closely related to metal dispersion. Considering that Cr is significantly cheaper compared to nickel, to reach 100% ethanol conversion, it would be more economically viable to reduce the nickel percentage to 7 wt.% along with a 2 wt.% of Cr. Furthermore, this combination represents the sample with the highest dispersion of Ni (see Table 1). In this respect, in previous works [23], it was verified that the effect of Cr promotion on the Ni-crystallite sizes avoided the formation of intermediary surface species of coke deposition reaching the best catalytic performance in the steam reforming of model bio-oil aqueous fraction. In another study [26], it was verified that adding Cr to Co/SBA-15 resulted in lower Co crystallites, thus improving the metal dispersion and increasing the activity in acetic acid steam reforming. Similarly, Singha et al. [47] studied the effect of Pd promotion on Ni/MgO for methane dry reforming. They concluded that the increased catalytic activity achieved by promoting Ni catalysts with a small amount of Pd was related to an increase in Ni reducibility and dispersion.
The effect of the Ni and Cr content in the catalyst formulation was also evaluated through the H2 TOF (min−1), defined as the ratio between the H2 formation rate and the number of Ni moles in the catalysts. The obtained 3D surface distribution as a function of Ni content in wt.% and the Ni/Cr molar ratio is displayed in Figure 7. For high Ni contents, close to 15 wt.%, the H2 TOF decreases considerably, resulting in values below 3.5 min−1 in all cases. This effect is related to the hydrogen production, which was not significantly improved for these samples, while the amount of Ni in the catalyst formulation was doubled compared to catalysts with a 7 wt.% of Ni. Conversely, as the Ni content decreases in the catalyst, the H2 TOF value increases, reaching the maximum values of 5.5–6.0 min−1 for the catalysts with a 7 wt.% of Ni. Concerning the Ni/Cr ratio for these samples, an increase in the TOF value can be observed at lower values ascribed to the higher ethanol conversions obtained (see Figure 6).
Apart from hydrogen, other byproducts are formed during bioethanol steam reforming using Ni-Cr catalysts. In this regard, Table 3 shows, along with hydrogen selectivities, the byproducts distribution, including CO2, CO, CH4, and coke. Regarding the distribution of gaseous products, no significant differences can be highlighted among the catalysts tested in the bioethanol reforming reaction. In all cases, the molar percentages were similar, with CO2 ranging approximately between 20% and 22%, CO between 13% and 15%, and CH4 between 3% and 6%. These small variations can be attributed to the different metal amounts in the catalysts, which influence the extent to which certain reactions are favored within the complex network of reactions involved in bioethanol reforming. Concerning coke deposition, in all cases, the amount was very low since the presence of Cr provides high resistance to coke formation because it inhibits the Ni active sites encapsulation by the carbon formation [48]. A significant reduction in coke deposition was observed in all cases with the lowest Ni/Cr ratio, highlighting the positive impact of including Cr in the catalyst formulation. This reduction in coke formation is in line with the smaller maximum temperature obtained in the DTG profiles summarized in Table 3. In all the cases, the maximum temperature is between 510 and 540 °C, suggesting the formation of carbon nanofilaments with different ordering degrees since amorphous carbon oxidizes at lower temperatures [49]. The lower the temperature, the more disordered the coke structures become, making its gasification easier in the reaction environment. This assumption aligns with the coke deposited after 5h time-on-stream, since for a Ni/Cr ratio of 2.5—regardless of the Ni content—the lower temperature is achieved, which explains the smaller amount of coke deposited over these samples. Furthermore, the mean crystallite sizes of the spent catalysts estimated by applying the Scherrer equation on the main diffraction line on Ni0 in the spent catalysts (Figure S1) are also displayed in Table 3. For all the catalysts tested, the increase in the Ni0 size is below 10% compared to the reduced samples, thus stating that the sintering effect under the operating conditions has a minor effect.
Based on the results described above, to select the sample with the best catalytic performance based on the metal content and the Ni/Cr ratio, attention should be paid to the hydrogen production and the ethanol conversion. In this regard, considering the results shown in Figure 6 and Figure 7, it can be established that 7 wt.% of Ni will increase the H2 TOF value. To maximize the conversion, the amount of Cr in the catalyst formulation should be increased up to 2 wt.% (Ni/Cr = 3.75) to achieve conversions close to 100%, thus optimizing the catalytic performance of the Ni-Cr/SBA-15 catalysts in the steam reforming of ethanol.

3. Materials and Methods

Catalysts containing different concentrations of Ni and Cr were prepared by incipient wetness impregnation over SBA-15 material used as support using mixed aqueous solutions of Ni(NO3)2·6H2O (Scharlau, Barcelona, Spain) and Cr(NO3)3·9H2O (Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) as metal precursors. The prepared catalysts were subsequently calcined under airflow up to 600 °C with a heating ramp of 2 °C/min. Samples were named (X-Y)NiCr/SBA15, where X refers to the molar Ni/Cr ratio (2.5–7.5) while Y refers to the amount of Ni in terms of wt.% (7–15). Calcined catalysts were characterized using different techniques, such as XRD, N2-physisorption, ICP-AES, H2-TPR, and TEM, to evaluate their textural and chemical properties.
X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements were recorded using an X’pert PRO diffractometer (Philips, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) with CuKα radiation. The Scherrer equation was used to estimate the mean crystallite size based on the obtained diffractograms. N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms were acquired on a Micromeritics Tristar 3000 analyzer (Micromeritics, Norcross, GA, USA) at 77 K, from which specific surface areas were estimated using the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller model (BET). Pore volumes were estimated by applying the Barret–Joyner–Halenda model (BJH) from the desorption branch. Before the analysis, all the samples were outgassed under vacuum for 4 h at 200 °C. Inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) was used to determine the Ni and Cr contents, using a Varian VISTA-PROAX spectrophotometer (Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA). The temperature-programmed reduction (H2-TPR) technique was used to evaluate the reducibility of the prepared catalysts. The reduction profiles were recorded on a Micromeritics AUTOCHEM 2910 apparatus (Micromeritics, Norcross, GA, USA), reducing the samples in 10% H2/Ar with a heating rate of 5 °C/min until 980 °C. The transmission electron microscopy (TEM) technique gives information about the catalyst morphology. TEM micrographs were acquired on a Philips TECNAI 20 microscope (200 kV; Philips, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) with a resolution of 0.28 nm after sample preparation, which involved its suspension in acetone and subsequent deposition on a carbon-coated copper grid.
ESR reactions were performed in a Microactivity PRO unit (PID Eng. & Tech; Alcobendas, Madrid, Spain) equipped with a stainless steel 316 (i.d. = 9.2 mm, L = 300 mm) fixed-bed reactor located in an electric oven. The reactions were carried out isothermally at 600 °C (measured employing a K-type thermocouple) under atmospheric pressure. The samples were previously reduced with pure hydrogen flow according to the H2-TPR results. The ethanol mixture (steam-to-carbon molar ratio of 1.85) was pumped at WHSV = 16.6 h−1 and then mixed with N2 (60 mL/min), used as a diluent and internal standard. The gas reaction products were analyzed online using an Agilent 490 Micro-GC (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with a thermal conductivity detector (TCD), a PoraPlot U column (10 m), and a Molecular Sieve 5A column (20 m) using He and Ar as carrier gas, respectively. Condensable vapors were collected in a condensing unit based on the Peltier effect and subsequently analyzed in a Varian CP-3900 chromatograph equipped with a CP-WAX 52 CB column (30 m × 0.25 mm, DF = 0.25) and flame ionization detector (FID) using 1,4-butanediol as internal standard. The catalytic performance was evaluated in terms of ethanol conversion (XEtOH, Equation (2)) and H2 turnover frequency (TOF, Equation (3)), where Fi is related to the molar flowrate in the inlet/outlet, and molNi is the total amount of Ni (mol) in the catalyst formulation.
X EtOH ( % ) = F EtOH , in F EtOH , out F EtOH , in · 100
TOF   ( min 1 ) = F H 2 , out mol Ni

4. Conclusions

The effect of the metal content and the Ni/Cr ratio over Ni-Cr/SBA-15 catalysts has been evaluated for the first time in the steam reforming of bioethanol. Increasing the Cr content enhances the Ni dispersion, as evidenced by the reduction in mean crystallite sizes calculated from the main X-ray diffraction lines of NiO and Ni0 in the calcined and reduced samples, respectively. As a result, increasing the Cr loading resulted in higher bioethanol conversion. This behavior is a consequence of the higher amount of active sites due to the promotion of Ni dispersion by Cr. On the other hand, the hydrogen production, measured in terms of TOF (min−1), decreases with the Ni content, suggesting that increased metal content does not necessarily improve hydrogen production. In fact, for the samples with the highest Ni content, TOF values remained below 3.5 min−1 in all cases. Nevertheless, for these samples, increasing the Cr content led to improved hydrogen production due to higher ethanol conversion. These findings suggest that lower Ni contents (7 wt.%) can increase the H2 TOF but, in order to maximize the bioethanol conversion and the hydrogen production, the amount of Cr in the catalyst formulation should be increased to around 2 wt.%. The optimization of the metal content and the Ni/Cr ratio can potentially lead to near-complete ethanol conversion with high hydrogen production, thereby optimizing the catalytic performance of Ni-Cr/SBA-15 catalysts in the steam reforming of bioethanol.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules30061206/s1, Figure S1: XRD of spent Ni-Cr Catalysts after 5h time-on-stream (S/C=1.85, T = 600 °C, P = atm, WHSV = 16.6h−1).

Author Contributions

P.J.M.: Investigation, formal analysis, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing. L.G.-M.: Investigation, formal analysis. A.J.V.: Methodology, formal analysis, writing—review and editing, funding acquisition. J.A.C.: Conceptualization, writing—review and editing, funding acquisition. A.C.: Conceptualization, formal analysis, writing—review and editing, funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Projects ENE2017-83696-R, PID2020-117273RB-I00, and TED2021-131499B-I00).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Abe, J.O.; Popoola, A.P.I.; Ajenifuja, E.; Popoola, O.M. Hydrogen energy, economy and storage: Review and recommendation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 15072–15086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Megía, P.J.; Vizcaíno, A.J.; Calles, J.A.; Carrero, A. Hydrogen Production Technologies: From Fossil Fuels toward Renewable Sources. A Mini Review. Energy Fuels 2021, 35, 16403–16415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. International Energy Agency. World Energy Outlook 2023—Analysis—IEA. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2023 (accessed on 18 January 2024).
  4. Dawood, F.; Anda, M.; Shafiullah, G.M. Hydrogen production for energy: An overview. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 3847–3869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dincer, I. Green methods for hydrogen production. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37, 1954–1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Shahabuddin, M.; Krishna, B.B.; Bhaskar, T.; Perkins, G. Advances in the thermo-chemical production of hydrogen from biomass and residual wastes: Summary of recent techno-economic analyses. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 299, 122557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hossain, M.A.; Jewaratnam, J.; Ganesan, P. Prospect of hydrogen production from oil palm biomass by thermochemical process—A review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2016, 41, 16637–16655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kalinci, Y.; Hepbasli, A.; Dincer, I. Biomass-based hydrogen production: A review and analysis. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2009, 34, 8799–8817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kaiwen, L.; Bin, Y.; Tao, Z. Economic analysis of hydrogen production from steam reforming process: A literature review. Energy Sources Part B Econ. Plan. Policy 2018, 13, 109–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yang, X.; Wang, S.; Li, B.; He, Y.; Liu, H. Performance of ethanol steam reforming in a membrane-assisted packed bed reactor using multiscale modelling. Fuel 2020, 274, 117829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Graschinsky, C.; Labore, M.; Amadeo, N.; Le Valant, A.; Bion, N.; Epron, F.; Duprez, D. Ethanol Steam Reforming over Rh(1%)MgAl2O4/Al2O3: A Kinetic Study. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2010, 49, 12383–12389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Montero, C.; Oar-Arteta, L.; Remiro, A.; Arandia, A.; Bilbao, J.; Gayubo, A.G. Thermodynamic comparison between bio-oil and ethanol steam reforming. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2015, 40, 15963–15971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lindo, M.; Vizcaíno, A.J.; Calles, J.A.; Carrero, A. Ethanol steam reforming on Ni/Al-SBA-15 catalysts: Effect of the aluminium content. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2010, 35, 5895–5901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Xiao, Z.; Li, Y.; Hao, F.; Wu, C.; Pan, L.; Zou, J.; Wang, L.; Zhang, X.; Liu, G.; Li, G. Engineering oxygen vacancies and nickel dispersion on CeO2 by Pr doping for highly stable ethanol steam reforming. Appl. Catal. B 2019, 258, 117940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bepari, S.; Kuila, D. Steam reforming of methanol, ethanol and glycerol over nickel-based catalysts-A review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 18090–18113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Megía, P.J.; Morales, A.; Vizcaíno, A.J.; Calles, J.A.; Carrero, A. Oxidative steam reforming of acetic acid on Ni catalysts: Influence of the La promotion on mesostructured supports. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 52, 1136–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sehested, J. Four challenges for nickel steam-reforming catalysts. Catal. Today 2006, 111, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Montero, C.; Ochoa, A.; Castaño, P.; Bilbao, J.; Gayubo, A.G. Monitoring Ni0 and coke evolution during the deactivation of a Ni/La2O3–αAl2O3 catalyst in ethanol steam reforming in a fluidized bed. J. Catal. 2015, 331, 181–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Claude, V.; Mahy, J.G.; Tilkin, R.G.; Lambert, S.D. Enhancement of the catalytic performances and lifetime of Ni/γ-Al2O3 catalysts for the steam toluene reforming via the combination of dopants: Inspection of Cu, Co, Fe, Mn, and Mo species addition. Mater. Today Chem. 2020, 15, 100229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sharma, Y.C.; Kumar, A.; Prasad, R.; Upadhyay, S.N. Ethanol steam reforming for hydrogen production: Latest and effective catalyst modification strategies to minimize carbonaceous deactivation. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 74, 89–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Horlyck, J.; Lawrey, C.; Lovell, E.C.; Amal, R.; Scott, J. Elucidating the impact of Ni and Co loading on the selectivity of bimetallic NiCo catalysts for dry reforming of methane. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 352, 572–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Carrero, A.; Calles, J.A.; García-Moreno, L.; Vizcaíno, A.J. Production of renewable hydrogen from glycerol steam reforming over bimetallic Ni-(Cu,Co,Cr) catalysts supported on SBA-15 silica. Catalysts 2017, 7, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Calles, J.A.; Carrero, A.; Vizcaíno, A.J.; García-Moreno, L.; Megía, P.J. Steam Reforming of Model Bio-Oil Aqueous Fraction Using Ni-(Cu, Co, Cr)/SBA-15 Catalysts. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bui, Q.T.P.; Kim, Y.; Yool, S.P.; Han, J.; Ham, H.C.; Nam, S.K.; Yoon, C.W. Steam reforming of simulated biogas over plate NiCr catalysts: Influence of pre-oxidation on catalytic activity. Appl. Catal. B 2015, 166–167, 335–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Casanovas, A.; Roig, M.; de Leitenburg, C.; Trovarelli, A.; Llorca, J. Ethanol steam reforming and water gas shift over Co/ZnO catalytic honeycombs doped with Fe, Ni, Cu, Cr and Na. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2010, 35, 7690–7698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Megía, P.J.; Carrero, A.; Calles, J.A.; Vizcaíno, A.J. Hydrogen Production from Steam Reforming of Acetic Acid as a Model Compound of the Aqueous Fraction of Microalgae HTL Using Co-M/SBA-15 (M: Cu, Ag, Ce, Cr) Catalysts. Catalysts 2019, 9, 1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liu, Q.; Zhong, Z.; Gu, F.; Wang, X.; Lu, X.; Li, H.; Xu, G.; Su, F. CO methanation on ordered mesoporous Ni–Cr–Al catalysts: Effects of the catalyst structure and Cr promoter on the catalytic properties. J. Catal. 2016, 337, 221–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yang, L.; Pastor-Pérez, L.; Gu, S.; Sepúlveda-Escribano, A.; Reina, T.R. Highly efficient Ni/CeO2-Al2O3 catalysts for CO2 upgrading via reverse water-gas shift: Effect of selected transition metal promoters. Appl. Catal. B 2018, 232, 464–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, X.; Tian, X.; Zheng, C.; Zhao, H. CrOx/Ce1−xZrxO2 for chemical looping propane oxidative dehydrogenation: The redox interaction between CrOx and the support. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2023, 274, 118697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rouibah, K.; Barama, A.; Benrabaa, R.; Guerrero-Caballero, J.; Kane, T.; Vannier, R.N.; Rubbens, A.; Löfberg, A. Dry reforming of methane on nickel-chrome, nickel-cobalt and nickel-manganese catalysts. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 29725–29734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ramantani, T.; Bampos, G.; Kaponi, K.; Kalamaris, E.; Kondarides, D.I. Propane steam reforming over La0.8Sr0.2Ni1-yMyO3 (M = Cr, Mn, Fe, Co) perovskite-type oxides. Appl. Catal. B Environ. Energy 2024, 358, 124391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Abrokwah, R.Y.; Ntow, E.B.; Jennings, T.; Stevens-Boyd, R.; Hossain, T.; Swain, J.; Bepari, S.; Hassan, S.; Mohammad, N.; Kuila, D. Cr and CeO2 promoted Ni/SBA-15 framework for hydrogen production by steam reforming of glycerol. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2023, 30, 120945–120962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Nogueira, F.G.E.; Assaf, P.G.M.; Carvalho, H.W.P.; Assaf, E.M. Catalytic steam reforming of acetic acid as a model compound of bio-oil. Appl. Catal. B 2014, 160–161, 188–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, Y.; Chen, M.; Yang, Z.; Liang, T.; Liu, S.; Zhou, Z.; Li, X. Bimetallic Ni-M (M = Co, Cu and Zn) supported on attapulgite as catalysts for hydrogen production from glycerol steam reforming. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2018, 550, 214–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Anh, A.N.; Nguyen, H.H.; Pham, T.P.T.; Pham, L.K.H.; Phuong, D.H.L.; Nguyen, N.A.; Vo, D.N.V.; Pham, P.T.H. Insight into the role of material basicity in the coke formation and performance of Ni/Al2O3 catalyst for the simulated- biogas dry reforming. J. Energy Inst. 2023, 108, 101252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Puron, H.; Pinilla, J.L.; Saraev, A.A.; Kaichev, V.V.; Millan, M. Hydroprocessing of Maya vacuum residue using a NiMo catalyst supported on Cr-doped alumina. Fuel 2020, 263, 116717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yun, D.; Baek, J.; Choi, Y.; Kim, W.; Lee, H.J.; Yi, J. Promotional Effect of Ni on a CrOx Catalyst Supported on Silica in the Oxidative Dehydrogenation of Propane with CO2. ChemCatChem 2012, 4, 1952–1959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gaspar, A.B.; Brito, J.L.F.; Dieguez, L.C. Characterization of chromium species in catalysts for dehydrogenation and polymerization. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2003, 203, 251–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gholami, S.; Alavi, S.M.; Rezaei, M. Preparation of highly active and stable nanostructured Ni-Cr2O3 catalysts for hydrogen purification via CO2 methanation reaction. J. Energy Inst. 2021, 95, 132–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Shanmugam, V.; Zapf, R.; Neuberg, S.; Hessel, V.; Kolb, G. Effect of ceria and zirconia promotors on Ni/SBA-15 catalysts for coking and sintering resistant steam reforming of propylene glycol in microreactors. Appl. Catal. B 2017, 203, 859–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Xie, T.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, J.; Shi, L.; Zhang, D. Ni nanoparticles immobilized Ce-modified mesoporous silica via a novel sublimation-deposition strategy for catalytic reforming of methane with carbon dioxide. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2015, 40, 9685–9695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Nakayama, O.; Ikenaga, N.; Miyake, T.; Yagasaki, E.; Suzuki, T. Production of synthesis gas from methane using lattice oxygen of NiO-Cr2O3-MgO complex oxide. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2010, 49, 526–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wang, J.; Yang, G.; Cheng, L.; Shin, E.W.; Men, Y. Three-dimensionally ordered macroporous spinel-type MCr2O4 (M = Co, Ni, Zn, Mn) catalysts with highly enhanced catalytic performance for soot combustion. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2015, 5, 4594–4601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Xiao, Z.; Xiu, J.; Wang, X.; Zhang, B.; Williams, C.T.; Su, D.; Liang, C. Controlled preparation and characterization of supported CuCr2O4 catalysts for hydrogenolysis of highly concentrated glycerol. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2013, 3, 1108–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Da Silva, A.L.M.; Den Breejen, J.P.; Mattos, L.V.; Bitter, J.H.; De Jong, K.P.; Noronha, F.B. Cobalt particle size effects on catalytic performance for ethanol steam reforming—Smaller is better. J. Catal. 2014, 318, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gupta, S.; Deo, G. Effect of metal amount on the catalytic performance of Ni–Al2O3 catalyst for the Tri-reforming of methane. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48, 5478–5492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Singha, R.K.; Shukla, A.; Sandupatla, A.; Deo, G.; Bal, R. Synthesis and catalytic activity of a Pd doped Ni–MgO catalyst for dry reforming of methane. J. Mater. Chem. A Mater. 2017, 5, 15688–15699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Fierro, V.; Akdim, O.; Provendier, H.; Mirodatos, C. Ethanol oxidative steam reforming over Ni-based catalysts. J. Power Sources 2005, 145, 659–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Megía, P.J.; Vizcaíno, A.J.; Ruiz-Abad, M.; Calles, J.A.; Carrero, A. Coke evolution in simulated bio-oil aqueous fraction steam reforming using Co/SBA-15. Catal. Today 2021, 367, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (A) N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms and (B) pore size distribution of the calcined Ni-Cr catalysts.
Figure 1. (A) N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms and (B) pore size distribution of the calcined Ni-Cr catalysts.
Molecules 30 01206 g001
Figure 2. XRD patterns of calcined Ni-Cr-based SBA-15 catalysts.
Figure 2. XRD patterns of calcined Ni-Cr-based SBA-15 catalysts.
Molecules 30 01206 g002
Figure 3. TEM micrographs of calcined (A) (2.5-15)NiCr/SBA15, (B) (3.75-15)NiCr/SBA15, and (C) (7.5-15)NiCr/SBA15 catalysts.
Figure 3. TEM micrographs of calcined (A) (2.5-15)NiCr/SBA15, (B) (3.75-15)NiCr/SBA15, and (C) (7.5-15)NiCr/SBA15 catalysts.
Molecules 30 01206 g003
Figure 4. H2-TPR profiles of calcined SBA-15-supported bimetallic Ni-Cr catalysts compared to Ni/SBA-15 reduction profile from refs. [23,37].
Figure 4. H2-TPR profiles of calcined SBA-15-supported bimetallic Ni-Cr catalysts compared to Ni/SBA-15 reduction profile from refs. [23,37].
Molecules 30 01206 g004
Figure 5. (A) XRD of reduced Ni-Cr catalysts at 700 °C and (B) Ni dispersion as a function of Ni and Cr content.
Figure 5. (A) XRD of reduced Ni-Cr catalysts at 700 °C and (B) Ni dispersion as a function of Ni and Cr content.
Molecules 30 01206 g005
Figure 6. Ethanol conversion after 5 h time-on-stream as a function of Ni and Cr content (S/C = 1.85, T = 600 °C, P = atm, WHSV = 16.6 h−1).
Figure 6. Ethanol conversion after 5 h time-on-stream as a function of Ni and Cr content (S/C = 1.85, T = 600 °C, P = atm, WHSV = 16.6 h−1).
Molecules 30 01206 g006
Figure 7. H2 TOF (min−1) after 5 h time-on-stream as a function of Ni and Cr content (S/C = 1.85, T = 600 °C, P = atm, WHSV = 16.6 h−1).
Figure 7. H2 TOF (min−1) after 5 h time-on-stream as a function of Ni and Cr content (S/C = 1.85, T = 600 °C, P = atm, WHSV = 16.6 h−1).
Molecules 30 01206 g007
Table 1. Physicochemical properties of Ni-Cr/SBA-15 catalysts.
Table 1. Physicochemical properties of Ni-Cr/SBA-15 catalysts.
CatalystNi (wt.%) aCr (wt.%) aSBET
(m2/g)
Vpore (cm3/g) bDpore (nm) cd NiO (nm) dd Ni (nm) eNi Dispersion (%) f
(7.5-7)NiCr/SBA156.41.05340.827.17.87.313.8
(3.75-7)NiCr/SBA157.01.85390.807.37.66.216.3
(2.5-7)NiCr/SBA157.12.75270.797.25.04.522.4
(7.5-11)NiCr/SBA1510.81.15270.817.27.97.613.3
(3.75-11)NiCr/SBA1511.02.75130.747.37.36.816.2
(2.5-11)NiCr/SBA1510.64.14960.737.25.34.622.0
(7.5-15)NiCr/SBA1514.41.84610.707.29.58.911.3
(3.75-15)NiCr/SBA1514.83.84630.677.37.06.216.3
(2.5-15)NiCr/SBA1514.75.74440.647.25.74.920.6
a Determined by ICP-AES in calcined samples; b measured at P/P0 = 0.97; c maximum of the BJH pore size distribution; d determined from XRD of calcined catalysts by Scherrer equation from the (200) diffraction plane of NiO; e determined from XRD of reduced catalysts by Scherrer equation from the (111) diffraction plane of Ni0; f dispersion calculated using the equation D (%) = 101/DNi assuming spherical nickel particles [33,34].
Table 2. Summary of theoretical consumption for NiO reduction and experimental H2-TPR uptake over Ni-Cr catalysts.
Table 2. Summary of theoretical consumption for NiO reduction and experimental H2-TPR uptake over Ni-Cr catalysts.
CatalystH2 Consumption (μmol H2)
Theoretical Experimental
(7.5-7)NiCr/SBA15109.0102.3
(3.75-7)NiCr/SBA15105.699.3
(2.5-7)NiCr/SBA15121.0114.3
(7.5-11)NiCr/SBA15184.0175.8
(3.75-11)NiCr/SBA15187.4178.2
(2.5-11)NiCr/SBA15180.6171.2
(7.5-15)NiCr/SBA15245.3236.5
(3.75-15)NiCr/SBA15252.2249.3
(2.5-15)NiCr/SBA15250.5246.4
Table 3. H2 selectivity, byproduct distribution in the ethanol steam reforming using Ni-Cr catalysts after 5 h time-on-stream (S/C = 1.85, T = 600 °C, P = atm, WHSV = 16.6 h−1), and spent catalysts characterization.
Table 3. H2 selectivity, byproduct distribution in the ethanol steam reforming using Ni-Cr catalysts after 5 h time-on-stream (S/C = 1.85, T = 600 °C, P = atm, WHSV = 16.6 h−1), and spent catalysts characterization.
CatalystS H2 (%)Product Distribution (mol %)Coke (gcoke/gcat·h)TDTG, max (°C)d Ni a (nm)
CO2COCH4
(7.5-7)NiCr/SBA1552.220.413.84.00.0085317.6
(3.75-7)NiCr/SBA1555.320.314.35.30.0085266.7
(2.5-7)NiCr/SBA1557.820.815.63.40.0065124.8
(7.5-11)NiCr/SBA1561.121.313.12.90.0125388.3
(3.75-11)NiCr/SBA1563.121.212.36.10.0135327.1
(2.5-11)NiCr/SBA1558.920.615.15.50.0035184.9
(7.5-15)NiCr/SBA1559.021.114.93.20.0185409.7
(3.75-15)NiCr/SBA1562.921.812.75.40.0145196.2
(2.5-15)NiCr/SBA1563.821.914.12.60.0035115.1
a Determined from XRD of used catalysts by Scherrer equation from the (111) diffraction plane of Ni0.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Megía, P.J.; García-Moreno, L.; Vizcaíno, A.J.; Calles, J.A.; Carrero, A. Bioethanol Steam Reforming for Hydrogen Production over Ni-Cr/SBA 15: Influence of Metal Loading and Ni/Cr Ratio. Molecules 2025, 30, 1206. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30061206

AMA Style

Megía PJ, García-Moreno L, Vizcaíno AJ, Calles JA, Carrero A. Bioethanol Steam Reforming for Hydrogen Production over Ni-Cr/SBA 15: Influence of Metal Loading and Ni/Cr Ratio. Molecules. 2025; 30(6):1206. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30061206

Chicago/Turabian Style

Megía, Pedro J., Lourdes García-Moreno, Arturo J. Vizcaíno, José A. Calles, and Alicia Carrero. 2025. "Bioethanol Steam Reforming for Hydrogen Production over Ni-Cr/SBA 15: Influence of Metal Loading and Ni/Cr Ratio" Molecules 30, no. 6: 1206. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30061206

APA Style

Megía, P. J., García-Moreno, L., Vizcaíno, A. J., Calles, J. A., & Carrero, A. (2025). Bioethanol Steam Reforming for Hydrogen Production over Ni-Cr/SBA 15: Influence of Metal Loading and Ni/Cr Ratio. Molecules, 30(6), 1206. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30061206

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop