Next Article in Journal
Spectra–Stability Relationships in Organic Electron Acceptors: Excited-State Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Targeting the Galectin Axis in Osteoarthritis: Chondroprotective Effects of Dietary and Pharmacological Phytochemicals
Previous Article in Special Issue
Unlocking the Alkaloid Biological Potential of Chili Pepper (Capsicum spp.), Cacao (Theobroma cacao L.), and Coffee (Coffea spp.) Byproducts: Characterization, Non-Conventional Extraction, Applications, and Future Perspectives
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Phytonutrient Profiles of Mistletoe and Their Values and Potential Applications in Ethnopharmacology and Nutraceuticals: A Review

by
Maeleletse G. Mopai
1,2,
Semakaleng Mpai
1,
Johannes Van Staden
2,* and
Ashwell R. Ndhlala
1,*
1
Department of Plant Production, Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, University of Limpopo, Private Bag X1106, Sovenga 0727, South Africa
2
Research Centre for Plant Growth and Development, School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, Private Bag X01, Scottsville 3209, South Africa
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2025, 30(22), 4390; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30224390
Submission received: 25 August 2025 / Revised: 26 September 2025 / Accepted: 30 September 2025 / Published: 13 November 2025

Abstract

Mistletoe species grow hemiparasitically on a wide spectrum of trees occurring in the tropical, subtropical and temperate zones. Mistletoe has been associated with fertility, vitality and fatality in humans. In the present review, we examine articles published in English and/or with the option to translate them into English on the distribution mechanism, ecological impact and value. This study aimed to interrogate and outline the phytonutrient profiling, ethnomedicinal and ethnopharmacological applications, toxicology and quality control of mistletoes, particularly the Loranthaceae and Viscaceae families. There are at least 1400 species of mistletoe belonging to these two families across the world. Humans have used mistletoe for years, and it has a rich history, mainly in traditional medicine. Recent research interests accompanied by investigations on mistletoe have made a major contribution to our understanding of the survival behavior and mechanisms of the species. This has prompted researchers to intensively investigate and justify its potential and applications in traditional medicine systems to further incorporate it into conventional scientific medicine processes. This study thoroughly outlines the nutritional and phytochemical constituents of various mistletoe species, as well as the factors that play a role in the process. The sections in this study dedicated to elaborating on the nutritional and phytochemical composition of mistletoe show that it is a plant species rich in nutrients and bioactive compounds, especially compared to its host. Its survival mechanism makes it possible for this plant species to contain significant quantities of both nutrients (proximate components and mineral elements) and bioactive compounds (viscin, alkaloids, phenolics and polyphenolics, tannins, flavonoids, terpenoids, glycosides, and saponins). Overall, mistletoe species have potential as medicinal plants, offering a range of health benefits and the ability to treat ailments (both communicable and non-communicable diseases). However, there are insufficient investigations and records of mistletoe’s toxicity, safety and quality control. Therefore, it is important to further investigate the potential applications, mechanisms of action, and optimal uses of mistletoe preparations and/or extracts.

1. Introduction

Throughout history, humankind has relied on nature for its basic needs, such as the production of foodstuffs, shelter, clothing, means of transportation, fertilizers, flavors and fragrances, and, most importantly, medicines for the treatment of various ailments [1]. Plants have formed the basis of sophisticated traditional medicine systems that have been in existence for thousands of years and continue to provide humankind with new remedies [1]. Mistletoe species have played a significant role as a traditional herbal medicine. Mistletoe is a general term given to a group of aerial obligate parasitic angiosperms that are epiphytic to a wide range of host trees from several families and genera. Mistletoe comprises evergreen parasitic plant species that occur on the stems and/or branches/barks of woody plants, conifers and deciduous host trees [2]. They range from hemiparasites that photosynthesize but access nutrients and water from the host xylem to holoparasites that are not capable of photosynthesis and must therefore access photosynthetic products from the phloem of host trees [3]. They have evolved from root parasitic species, whereby, during evolution, they developed a special multi-functional organ known as an haustorium, which penetrates the shoot to connect to the vascular tissues of a host [4]. This parasitic-specific intrusive organ serves as an anchor and as a root for the absorption of water and minerals from its host [5,6,7,8]. For nutrient supply, this species strictly relies on the xylem sap of the host plant for the extraction of some pharmacologically significant metabolites, but, due to a lack of connection between the phloem tissues of the host and epiphyte, the flow of photo-assimilates is restricted from the epiphyte to the host. Haustorium development by mistletoes enables them to overcome direct resource competition from the soil with other more competitive plants, and, by becoming aerial, they minimize canopy shade [9].
Most mistletoe species are of a generalist nature, while some are specialist mistletoes. Polhill and Wiens [10] state that, in Africa, 70% of mistletoes are generalists, parasitizing a wide range of host families, 12% are specific to a few families but occasionally parasitize species of other families, and 18% are specific to host species from one genus. Mistletoe species are primarily represented by the most common, diverse and widespread families including Loranthaceae and Viscaceae, which are taxonomically related to each other, and share the order Santalales [11]. Loranthaceae comprises at least 75 genera with over 900 species, and about 7 genera and an estimated 500 species belong to Viscaceae [11]. Over the years, studies have focused on the common European mistletoe species Viscum album, which revealed much of what is known about this intriguing group of plants [12]. Only in recent years has research focused on other mistletoe species from various genera [13,14,15,16,17,18,19].
This study aimed to generate a comprehensive review of the phytonutrient profiling, ethnomedicinal values and applications, and toxicity and safety of some preparations and extracts of various mistletoe species that belong to the most common and diverse families, Loranthaceae and Viscaceae.

2. Methodology

Several electronic databases, including Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, PubMed, PubChem, Wiley Online, Scopus, Elsevier, and Springer Nature, were scrutinized. Articles, abstracts, and theses were also used as sources of information. The keywords included in the search were: “Loranthaceae”, “Viscaceae”, “systematics”, “Mistletoe ”, “seed dispersal”, “distribution”, “nutritional composition”, “bioactive compounds”, “host-parasite interactions”, “ecological impacts”, “physiological effects”, “ethnopharmacology”, “preparation”, “extract”, “Helix®”, “Iscador®”, “AbnobaViscum®”, “lectin”, “viscotoxin”, “cancer”, “oncology”, “clinical trial”, “therapy”, “safety”, “toxicology”, “pharmacology”, “commercialization”, “anthroposophic medicine”.

3. Distribution and Habitat of Mistletoe Families, Loranthaceae and Viscaceae

Mistletoe species are mainly distributed in major biomes of different climate types [20,21,22]. Mistletoes normally occur in tropical and subtropical regions of Africa, Asia, Australia and Madagascar as well as in temperate zones of Europe, southern Asia and Africa. They are rare and/or absent in parts of northern Africa and completely absent in extremely cold areas [4,23,24], including Russia, Canada and Alaska. Mistletoe distribution is greatly impacted by a wide spectrum of biotic and abiotic factors. Temperature is one of the most critical abiotic factors affecting the occurrence and/or life of mistletoes [25]. Summer and winter temperatures play a fundamental role in limiting the geographical distribution of mistletoe. For instance, the optimum temperatures conducive to mistletoe occurrence range between 15 and 20 °C [25]. Mistletoe has perennial leaves and photosynthetic stems, and it is very sensitive to low winter temperatures, which determines its cold tolerance, and thus its northernmost or uppermost distribution limits [26,27]. According to Varga et al. [28], the distribution limits of mistletoe (V. album) correlate with the monthly mean temperatures of the warmest and coldest months of the year. Furthermore, Varga et al. [28] stated that in the event of climate change, such as global warming, mistletoe is likely to benefit and expand its range. Iversen [26] also reported that mistletoes are limited in their geographic distribution by both low summer and low winter temperatures. Skre [29] found that the mean monthly temperatures of the coolest and the warmest months related closely to the heat sum that is needed as energy for the respiration and growth of evergreen plants (respiration equivalent; RE). For example, the temperature data for these 2 months outlines the limits of occurrence of V. album ssp. album. Besides climatic conditions, the global occurrence and distribution of mistletoe is governed by several factors such as preferred host tree availability, altitude and elevation, geographic location, vegetation type, bird dispersal, habitat disturbance and the presence of competing plants.

4. Ecological Impact and Value of Mistletoes

Mistletoes are known to cause significant damage to forests, orchards, plantations, and ornamentals worldwide. According to Sangüesa-Barreda et al. [23], mistletoes are considered one of the major increasing agents of global forest decline. Hawksworth [30] also noted that mistletoes could impair growth, lower host vigor, reduce wood quality and quantity, and predispose trees to be attacked by insects, disease, and fungi. In North America, dwarf mistletoes (Arceuthobium), which parasitize conifers, are responsible for most of the damage. Dwarf mistletoes (Viscaceae family) can affect their hosts in various ways, including reducing their vigor, growth rate, flowering and fruiting, and the quality and quantity of forest products produced. They can also predispose trees to attack or damage by insects and infection by fungi, which can result in the premature death of commercially valuable trees [31,32]. The semi-parasitic African mistletoe (Loranthus micranthus L.) also causes similar consequences for tree development, although it depends on water and nutrients from the host plant [33].
Mistletoe impacts lead to fatalities, promote the growth of epicormic shoots on host branches, resulting in numerous witches’-brooms (Hexenbesen), cause swelling and cankers on the trunk that may accumulate resin, and cause spike-tops. These factors, especially the massive witches’-brooms, increase the fire hazard by altering the quality, quantity, distribution, and flammability of fuel in the forest [34]. Estimates indicate that these species caused annual wood losses of about 500 million cubic feet in the United States (U.S.) over the previous decade [35] and 150 million cubic feet in British Columbia. In areas where adverse abiotic factors are concentrated, such as increased erosion, higher pollination levels, and frequent drought, hosts become more susceptible to mistletoe infestation [36]. Hardwood trees such as Fagus sylvatica L. are resistant to mistletoe infestation, although other species such as Quercus spp. and Ulmus spp. are rarely affected [37].
Despite their nature as parasites and having major economic impacts, mistletoes (Loranthaceae and Viscaceae) are increasingly recognized as keystone species that contribute disproportionately to ecosystem function and biodiversity. Mistletoe-host relationship often transcends parasitism, showing facultative mutualism whereby the host provides structural support for mistletoe while mistletoes reciprocate by nutrient enrichment of the soil through rapid litter decomposition [38,39]. Mistletoes are regarded as ecological engineers due to their ability to modify their physical environment through soil nutrient cycling, hydrology, and microclimatic conditions (atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) [40]. Additionally, their dense growth structures create significant habitats for birds and arthropod communities [41,42,43]. Despite representing a minor canopy constituent with regard to biomass, at the ecosystem scale, mistletoe enhances the ecosystem/biodiversity through principal mechanisms (1) augmented floral resource provision (nectar, pollen) and the provision of nutrient-rich foliage that support and maintain diverse faunal assemblages, (2) creation of microhabitats through their dense growth morphology and induced host canopy architectural alteration, and (3) subsidization of detrital food webs through enriched litterfall quality and quantity that accelerates nutrient cycling [44,45,46].
As semi-succulent shrubs and relatively to their hosts, mistletoes are rich in tissue nitrogen, phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) concentrations [36,45]; therefore, they serve as critical forage sources for herbivores, from browsing mammals to arthropods [47]. Canopies infected by mistletoe maintain lower temperatures and high humidity rates, creating a microclimate that provides thermal refugia for fauna during heat stress, especially due to accelerating climate change effects [48]. The nutrient-enriched litterfall generated by mistletoe stimulates and promotes facilitative interactions across ecosystems. For example, a study by Watson and Herring [48] showed avian richness declined by 36% due to the removal of mistletoes from the Eucalypt woodlands. Subsequently, during drought conditions, ground-foraging insectivores were significantly negatively affected [48]. In contrast, woodlands infected by mistletoes exhibited greater resilience by supporting two-fold the proportion of woodland-dependent species post-drought conditions compared to woodlands that are mistletoe-free [49]. The overall effects of mistletoe, ranging from trophic support to biogeochemical cycling, underscore mistletoe’s capacity and ability to regulate, modify and amplify ecosystem processes across spatial scales. The ecological significance of mistletoe was placed beyond its parasitic nature [50,51].

5. Nutritional Composition of Mistletoe Species

Generally, medicinal plants are rich in nutrients and substances that have the potential to be used for therapeutics or to synthesize useful drugs [52]. The nutritional constituents of mistletoes are mainly linked to their interactions with their ecosystem. Mistletoe species are autotrophs that entirely or partially rely on the host for water and nutrients [53]. Their nutritional levels are greatly influenced by the physicochemical status of the host because of their parasitic habit [3] as well as other factors, including species, host tree species, environmental conditions, plant age, plant part, and seasonal variation. The plants’ nutritional benefits are due to their chemical composition [54]. Previous investigations have reported mineral element composition of different mistletoe species (Table 1). Calcium (Ca), potassium (K), iron (Fe), magnesium (Mg), manganese (Mn), sodium (Na), zinc (Zn), phosphorus (P), and copper (Cu) amongst other elements [nitrogen (N), sulfur (S), selenium (Se), iodine (I), molybdenum (Mo), and boron (B)], were the major mineral elements reported in different investigations on different mistletoe species belonging to the families Loranthaceae and Viscaceae (Table 1). There is scanty literature on proximate component analysis, such as moisture content, ash, crude fat, total carbohydrate, protein, crude fiber, crude protein, nitrogen-free extract, dry matter, and organic matter of mistletoe, particularly in the Loranthaceae and Viscaceae families. However, there has been a recent interest in investigations aimed at screening and/or profiling the proximate components of various Loranthaceae and Viscaceae species (Table 2).
Parasitism of plants by other plants provides an exceptional opportunity for investigating correlative nutritional relationships. Host plants play a significant role in the quality and quantity of elemental constituents in mistletoe species. The difference in elemental composition as well as natural constituents of mistletoe growing on different host plants is probably due to the nature of the host and interaction with these hosts [18]. Theories have proposed that the higher transpiration rate of mistletoe than its host serves as a nutrient-gathering role since mistletoe has evolved to have a lower energetic investment in haustoria than would be the case for a free-standing plant that requires structural and conducting roots [66]. Mistletoe’s nutrient acquisition mechanisms enable it to accumulate greater foliar mineral concentrations relative to their hosts [67]. Thus, mistletoes contain greater foliar mineral concentrations than their hosts [67] as well as some natural components. This is not the case in all elements and some organic components. However, little is known about whether hemiparasitic mistletoes actively access nutrients from the host phloem [68]. Because N is highly phloem-mobile while Ca is a large molecule, and is phloem-immobile, an N:Ca ratio > 1 implies an active uptake from the host phloem and may suggest that water and nutrient acquisition are not tightly coupled [53,69,70,71].
The nature of the host plants confers differences in the elemental and proximate constituents of mistletoes due to interaction with their host plants. Several studies have reported the presence of various proximate components in various mistletoe species (Table 2). According to Nwoke et al. [18], T. bangwensis leaves exhibited lower concentrations of moisture content and total ash. In contrast, carbohydrates and proteins were present in appreciable amounts. Kim et al. [62] on the other hand reported that the leaves of a V. album var. coloratum were found to contain relatively high moisture, ash, fiber and carbohydrate contents, and low crude protein and fat content. Some of the findings in the literature [17,61,64,65] agree with a study conducted by Mnisi et al. [63] who found that carbohydrate was the predominant proximate component in both leaves and twigs of V. verrucosum followed by crude protein, crude fiber, crude ash and crude fat. The lower moisture content present in plant materials implies the potential long shelf-life characteristic since water content is an indicator of water activity and can be used as a component to assess the stability and susceptibility of the plant material to microbial contamination [72,73]. Furthermore, low total ash content indicates possible low total mineral elements content. High ash content indicates the presence of some mineral elements [74]. The presence of carbohydrates and proteins may be due to conglomerates of bioactive sugars, glycoproteins or proteins that contribute to the plant’s medicinal potency against specific diseases or stresses [75]. Mistletoe extracts with high fiber and low fat content are nutritionally beneficial and reduce the risks of cancer and heart diseases as they play a crucial role in lowering the levels of serum cholesterol [76]. Although there are several factors involved in the presence of proximate components of mistletoe species, there is a discrepancy in several studies profiling and quantifying the proximate components.
Furthermore, mistletoes do not share the nutrients with their hosts to avoid mineral deficiency and cope with excess and imbalances [3]. A possible reason why many mobile nutrients are found in higher concentrations in mistletoes than in their host plants. Türe et al. [58] reported that the nutrient concentrations of N, P, K, Na, Zn, S and Cu; except Mo was higher in mistletoe (V. album) than its host, and Ca, Mg, Mn, Fe and B, lower in mistletoe than four different deciduous host trees, Populus alba, Crataegus monogyna, Salix alba and Robinia pseudoacacia (Table 3). In host trees, concentrations of Ca, Na, Zn, and Mo in P. alba; P, K, Mg, Mn, Cu, S, and B in S. alba; N in R. pseudoacacia; and Fe in C. monogyna are the highest compared to the concentrations recorded in mistletoes [58]. Umucalilar et al. [71] reported the presence of Ca, P, Fe, Cu and Zn in V. album at different vegetation stages, harvested from three different host species, inclusive of almond (Amygdalus communis L.), plum (Prunus domestica L.) and willow (S. alba) (Figure 1). The concentrations of both Ca and P were excessively higher in V. album from all three host species as compared to Fe, Cu and Zn [71]. The V. album harvested from almond (38.5%) and plum (38.5%) was predominated by Ca, and there were no significant differences. Cu and Zn were the lowest mineral elements present in V. album harvested from almond (7.7%) and plum (7.7%). However, there was an increased Zn percentage exhibited by the V. album from willow (20%). Samples of V. album harvested from willow plants exhibited the lowest percentage of Ca (33.3), P (26.7), Fe (13.3) and Cu (6.7) compared to V. album harvested from almond and plum (Figure 1). Elements such as Ca and B were higher in the host trees than in mistletoe, simply because of their limited mobility or immobile characteristics [77]. Lo Gullo et al. [66] also described the increase in mineral content in mistletoe compared to the host. Furthermore, Lo Gullo et al. [66], assumed that the lack of or limited photosynthetic activity in mistletoe leads to the accumulation of nutritional elements, mainly K and Ca. Several studies support these findings [77,78,79].

6. Phytochemical Composition of Mistletoe Species

Secondary metabolites, commonly referred to as phytochemicals, are non-nutrient natural plant bioactive compounds that possess the potential to mitigate disease due to their antioxidant activity [80]. Secondary plant metabolites are necessary for the survival of plants and help to establish interactions between plants and the environment [81]. Phytochemicals constitute an important part of the plant’s defense mechanism against pathogenic attacks and environmental stresses, in addition to providing a valuable range of natural products. Although natural products, particularly secondary metabolites, serve as the foundation for medications, their presence in plant biochemistry is frequently challenging to rationalize [1]. Mistletoe’s bioactive constituents include gastric-irritating alkaloids, cardiac toxins (viscotoxins, phoratoxins), lectins, saponins, sterols, terpenes, glycosides, lycopene, isoflavones, β-carotene [82], tannins, flavonoids, and phenolic compounds [83], yet the contents of these metabolites are unstable. Several studies have reported phytochemical constituents present in different mistletoe species from both the Loranthaceae and Viscaceae families (Table 4). Table 4 shows phytochemical screening of different mistletoe species reported in different studies [14,15,17,18,54,55,84,85,86,87,88]. However, alkaloids, anthraquinones, flavonoids, glycosides, saponins, tannins, steroids and terpenes appear to be the commonly studied and reported phytochemicals [14,15,17,54,55]. The most intriguing aspect is that some of these compounds are derived from the host tree rather than mistletoe. According to Martin Cordero et al. [83], some alkaloids can only be found in mistletoe growing on plants that synthesize these chemicals. Factors such as the region/location effect, host tree and seasonal variation have an impact on the chemical composition of mistletoe [89].
Figure 2 illustrates the overall average phytochemical concentration (%) of African mistletoe’s (T. dodoneifolius (DC) Danser) leaf extracts harvested from 14 different host trees. Notably, there was a significant difference in terms of the presence of the phytochemical constituents of African mistletoe’s (T. dodoneifolius) leaf extracts tested [85]. Overall, the leaf extracts of T. dodoneifolius from 14 different host trees were predominated by anthraquinones (33%) and tannins (31%). Saponins (25%), followed by alkaloids (11%) were the least present phytochemical constituents of the T. dodoneifolius leaf extracts. In contrast, phlobatannins were absent (0%) in all the leaf extracts of T. dodoneifolius harvested from 14 distinct host trees (Figure 2). Due to its bioactive compounds and its beneficial effects on the human body, mistletoe has become more and more studied, developing various pharmaceutical formulations (Iscador, Isorel, Iscucin, Lektinol, Eurixor, Helixor, Abnoba-Viscum and recombinant mistletoe lectin (ML-1)) [24]. Several chemical and pharmacological studies have identified various types of compounds in mistletoe, such as lectins, viscotoxins, lignans, amines, flavonoids, and polysaccharides [90,91]. S. atropurpurea included 16 bioactive materials comprising six (6) fatty acid compounds, two (2) xanthines, two (2) flavonols, a glycoside, monoterpene glycosides, one (1) lignan glycoside, and four (4) flavones [92].
Table 4. Phytochemical screening of different mistletoe species belonging to Loranthaceae and Viscaceae families.
Table 4. Phytochemical screening of different mistletoe species belonging to Loranthaceae and Viscaceae families.
MistletoePhytochemicals DetectedReferences
Family NameScientific Name
LoranthaceaeTapinanthus dodoneifolius (DC.) DanserAnthraquinones, a rare presence of alkaloids, saponins, and tannins[85]
LoranthaceaeLoranthus micranthus L.Alkaloids, saponins, tannins, flavonoids, glycosides and a few steroids[89]
Alkaloids, saponins, tannins, flavonoids, terpenoids, glycosides, reducing sugars[86]
LoranthaceaePhragmanthera incana (Schumach.) BalleAnthraquinones, alkaloids, saponins, tannins, cardenolides[54]
LoranthaceaeTapinanthus bangwensis (Engl. & K.Krause) DanserFlavonoids, saponins, tannins, and cardiac glycosides[14]
Steroidal glycoside, flavonoids, phenols, saponins, tannins[18]
LoranthaceaePhragmanthera capitata (Spreng.) BalleAnthraquinones, alkaloids, phenolic acids, saponins, tannins, flavonoids, cyanogenic glycosides[15]
LoranthaceaeLoranthus micranthus Hook.f.Alkaloids, saponins, tannins, flavonoids, phenolic acids, steroids[17]
LoranthaceaeTapinanthus preussii (Engl.) Tiegh.Anthraquinones, antioxidants, alkaloids, saponins, tannins, flavonoids, phenolic acids, steroids, cardiac glycosides, cyanogenic glycosides, carotenoids, phlobatannins[55]
LoranthaceaeScurrula atropurpurea (Blume) DanserPolyphenols, tannins, flavonoids, monoterpenoids and sesquiterpenoids, steroids, triterpenoids and quinones [84]
ViscaceaeViscum album L.Alkaloids, flavonoids, viscotoxins, lectins, phenolic acids, terpenoids, sterols, phenylpropanoids[87]
Terpenoids, fatty acids and vitamin E [88]
Polyphenols are a group of bioactive compounds that possess significant functions in plants. There are approximately 8000 plant-derived polyphenols, and they are responsible for various metabolic processes. They have higher antioxidant power owing to their chemical structural characteristics [93]. The main polyphenols identified in mistletoes are from the phenolic acids class, both hydroxybenzoic acid (gallic acid, protocatechuic acid) and hydroxycinnamic acid (caffeic, ferulic acid, synaptic acid), and flavonoids including flavanone (naringenin, eriodictiol), flavone (apigenin), and flavonol (3-O-Methyl quercetin, myricetin, and kaempferol). Phenolic acids are important compounds not only for ensuring the construction of lignin, but also for the regulation of plant growth and disease resistance stimulation. For instance, hydroxy-cinnamic acids are associated with the role of plant growth regulators and proteins in the development of certain diseases. Flavonoids are a class of polyphenol compounds, secondary metabolites of vegetal origin, with antioxidant properties, which are found in the free state or seen as esters or glycosides in mistletoe [93]. Several studies have identified and reported polyphenols present in various mistletoe species (Table 5). Their presence and/or availability have been shown to be mainly influenced by the host tree and climatic conditions. However, the mechanisms remain controversial, and at present, most of the research focus is on either limited numbers of metabolic compounds or merely one of these two influencing factors mentioned above.
Investigations have shown that the host tree species, its physiological state of development and harvesting period/season influence the phytochemical composition and antioxidant activities of mistletoes [86,98,99]. The preliminary results of a study conducted by Ukwueze et al. [86], June 2001 (winter season), showed the presence of bioactive compounds including tannins, alkaloids, saponins, flavonoids, glycosides and little or absence of steroids in all mistletoe (L. micranthus) extracts harvested from six different host tree sources, namely Irvingia gabonensis, Pentaclethra macrophylla, Kola accuminata, Baphia nitida, Persea americana and Azadirachta indica (Figure 3). The chemical constituents showed variation in terms of degree of content and not in terms of the kind of chemical compounds present in the extracts of mistletoes harvested from different host trees. For example, alkaloids were more predominant in mistletoe extracts of L. micranthus from I. gabonensis, P. americana and B. nitida than in the other three host tree species examined. Furthermore, glycosides and flavonoids were more predominant in mistletoe extracts harvested from A. indica than in the rest of the sources. Saponins were abundant in A. indica compared to other plant sources [86] (Figure 3).

7. Mechanistic Basis of Host Tree Influence on Mistletoe Biochemical Composition

The significant impact of the tree species hosting mistletoe on its chemical makeup, which includes its essential nutritional components like minerals, carbohydrates, and amino acids, along with unique phytochemicals, is foundational to mistletoe’s biology and poses a significant challenge for establishing uniform standards. This variation related to the host can be understood through a tiered series of linked processes, starting with how resources are gathered and continuing to how metabolism is controlled. The most straightforward mechanism involves mistletoe relying on the xylem sap of its host for all water and nutrient solutes. Each type of sap has a unique composition depending on the tree species, which leaves a fundamental chemical mark on the mistletoe parasite. The tree it attaches to directly influences the basic nutritional characteristics of mistletoe. This entails specific levels of both macro and micronutrients (for example, nitrogen, potassium, calcium, magnesium, zinc, copper) and the types of organic carbon and nitrogen compounds (such as specific amino acids like arginine and certain sugars) found in the xylem. For instance, a mistletoe growing on a pine tree located in nutrient-deficient soil will inherently have a different elemental and nutritional composition compared to one growing on an apple tree in nutrient-rich soil.
In addition to basic nutrition, the xylem sap could also contain particular organic precursors or signaling molecules (like jasmonic acid) that the mistletoe can either use or react to, which in turn can affect the pathways involved in creating complex secondary metabolites. The mineral content taken from the host not only adds nutritional value but also plays a crucial role in managing phytochemical creation. Various important minerals serve as cofactors for significant enzymes involved in secondary metabolic processes. For instance, the success of producing certain phenolic compounds or alkaloids can significantly depend on the presence of metal ions like copper or iron. Hence, a host that delivers xylem sap rich in certain micronutrients can enhance the mistletoe’s synthesis of specific bioactive compounds associated with those nutrients, establishing a direct connection between the nutrition derived from the host and the production of phytochemicals. A more intricate and less substantiated theory suggests a deeper manipulation by the host. It is possible that small regulatory RNA molecules or even functional genes could be transferred from the host to the mistletoe at their attachment site. This gene transfer could directly modify the expression of the mistletoe’s genes that control nutrient uptake, primary metabolism, or secondary metabolite production, resulting in a chemical profile that combines traits from both the mistletoe and its host.
In summary, the influence of the host tree is a multifaceted process. It begins with shaping the elemental and nutritional components of mistletoe through its xylem sap. This initial input lays the groundwork for developing a specific phytochemical profile by supplying the required substrates, cofactors, and potential signaling molecules that direct the mistletoe’s metabolic functions. Understanding these mechanisms illustrates why the choice of host tree is not merely a botanical aspect but a crucial factor determining the chemical and medicinal effectiveness of mistletoe extracts.

8. Ethnomedicinal Values and Application of Mistletoe

Plants have played a crucial role in preserving human health and well-being for millennia. In recent years, there has been renewed interest in natural medicines that are obtained from plant parts or plant extracts [100]. Medicinal plants are used globally as a valuable source for new drug formulations. A significant portion of the global population continues to depend on medicinal plants and other conventional remedies for their day-to-day healthcare needs [1]. Communities using traditional methods may not fully comprehend the scientific justifications for relying on indigenous treatments, but they are aware of the therapeutic benefits of certain plant extract doses [1]. There is a general belief amongst consumers globally that herbal drugs are always safe because they are “natural”. However, scientific evidence suggests otherwise. The mere fact that a product is “natural” may not signify that the product is safe [101]. Although limited evidence suggests that adverse effects associated with the use of herbal drugs are less likely to occur than with conventional drugs, they do usually occur mildly and only affect a small number of people. Recent evidence suggests that some of the herbs considered safe over the last many decades have proven to be associated with health hazards [101]. Historically, natural products or plants represent a valuable and rich source of biologically active compounds with recognized potential in drug discovery and development [102] to create safe, effective, and cost-efficient medications [103]. The therapeutic potential of plants is primarily attributed to their phytochemical components, which accumulate in various plant tissues such as roots, rhizomes, stems, leaves, flowers, or bark [56], which have shown several biological and pharmacological activities. Research on mistletoe in Africa has primarily focused on crop protection, with little attention given to its potential applications in ethnopharmacology [104]. There has been a growing interest in employing medicinal plants, including mistletoe, in developing countries due to the reported safety and lack of adverse effects associated with herbal medicines compared to synthetic drugs [14]. The use of natural health products derived from plants is increasing worldwide. It is known that approximately 80% of the population in developing countries relies on traditional medicine, which mainly consists of herbal prescriptions [105].
Mistletoes, traditionally valued medicinal plants, were described as “an all-purpose herb” due to its rich traditional uses [106] and has been widely used in ethnomedicinal fraternities for various purposes such as antihypertensive, anticancer, antispasmodic, antidiabetic, epilepsy, asthma, headaches, high blood pressure, menopausal symptoms, infertility, dermatitis, arthritis, and rheumatism [107]. However, these claims and/or investigations are rarely supported and validated by clinical studies. In vitro and in vivo studies confirm a broad spectrum of the therapeutic action of mistletoe species. There is an obvious discrepancy between the popularity of mistletoe extracts and their classification as a non-conventional treatment modality with unproven efficacy in oncology. The commercial preparations suffer from several major drawbacks: lack of precise declarations for the molecular characteristics and the concentrations of diverse extract constituents; the composition of extracts can even be influenced by the different methods of preparation, the time of harvest, and the type of host tree; lack of experimentally substantiated instructions for the dose of supposedly effective substance(s) and the schedule of applications to clinically trigger an indisputably documented antitumoral activity; lack of thorough clinical studies according to the generally accepted criteria as the measure for responsible recommendations [108].
Table 6 summarizes the pharmacological activities of different mistletoe species from the Loranthaceae and Viscaceae families. The ethnomedicinal value of these plants (mistletoe) is related to their phytochemical constituents. These bioactive compounds are commonly associated with pharmacologically fundamental activities. Whilst the mechanism of action of some of these bioactive compounds remains vague, there is, however, consensus that their wide pharmacological applications are due to their structural diversity. Mistletoe (Viscum album) preparations contain active components like mistletoe lectins (ML) and viscotoxins, and are reported to show antitumoral properties by causing cell cycle delay or arrest and induction of apoptosis [109,110], affecting tumor angiogenesis [111,112] and exerting immune-potentiating activities that may enhance the host defense system against tumors [113,114,115,116]. Molecular compounds of mistletoe are reported to show in vitro inhibitory potential on P-glycoprotein (P-gp), also known as multidrug resistance protein 1 (MDR1) [117]. Bioactive compounds, such as saponins, flavonoids, tannins, and cardiac glycosides extracted from mistletoe species have been shown to exhibit medicinal and physiological activities [118]. Flavonoids exhibit antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, antiallergic, antimutagenic, antiviral, antineoplastic, antithrombotic, and vasodilatory activities [119]. Flavonoids and phenolic acids are natural antioxidants involved in the biological activity of the plant and used in the prevention of diseases such as cancer, caused by oxidative stress induced by free radicals in the body. Tannins reported in a study by Omoruyi and Onyeneke [14] have a wide variety of applications, ranging from antiviral, antibacterial, antiparasitic, and inhibition of HIV replication in infected H9 lymphocytes with little toxicity, like epigallitannins. Cancer therapy with V. album extracts has been performed in Europe for over six decades on thousands of patients. Plant extracts are mainly used as injections. Currently, several mistletoe preparations (e.g., Helixor and Iscador) are used in many countries to treat different types of cancer [120]. Ohashi et al. [88] reported that the alkynic fatty acid octadeca-8, 10, 12-triynoic acid found as chemical constituents of Scurrula atropurpurea (Loranthaceae), a parasitic plant of the tea plant Thea sinensis (Theaceae), exhibited a potent inhibitory effect on cancer cell invasion in vitro.

9. Ethnopharmacological Correlations: Bridging Traditional Use and Scientific Validation

The customary applications of different mistletoe species, especially in European and African traditional medicine, are now being validated by contemporary pharmacological research to discover the active compounds and how they work. This scientific confirmation enhances the justification for additional research and possible advancement of therapies based on mistletoe. Table 7 outlines the main connectedness between the traditional applications and scientific validation of mistletoe extracts.
The common traditional use of Viscum album (European mistletoe) in cancer care is justified by the strong cell-killing and immune system-regulating effects of its main components, mistletoe lectins (MLs) and viscotoxins. ML-I has been shown to trigger cell death in several cancer cell lines and to activate immune cells, including natural killer (NK) cells, macrophages, and T-lymphocytes [124]. Viscotoxins demonstrate a direct ability to destroy the membranes of tumor cells [125]. These mechanisms offer a scientific foundation for using mistletoe extracts as additional treatment in cancer care. The conventional use of plants such as L. micranthus (African mistletoe) for treating high blood pressure is backed by proof of its effects on the cardiovascular system. Flavonoids and various phenolic compounds extracted from these species have demonstrated vasorelaxant properties on isolated aortic rings, as well as inhibitory activity against angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) in laboratory settings [126]. These activities are linked to a reduction in blood pressure in animal studies. The application of mistletoe for inflammatory ailments such as arthritis is supported by the anti-inflammatory properties of its flavonoid and phenolic acid constituents. Research indicates that extracts from mistletoe can block important pathways that cause inflammation, which includes the creation of cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-6, as well as enzymes like cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) [127]. Historical accounts of using mistletoe for diabetes are associated with its possible blood sugar-lowering effects. Extracts from V. album have been demonstrated to block carbohydrate-digesting enzymes such as α-amylase and α-glucosidase in laboratory studies, and they enhance glucose tolerance in animal models. These effects are believed to result from the presence of polysaccharides and flavonoids (Table 7) [128].
Table 7. Ethnopharmacological correlations of various mistletoe species.
Table 7. Ethnopharmacological correlations of various mistletoe species.
Mistletoe
Species
Traditional Use/AilmentPutative Active
Compound(s)
Reported Biological Activity (In Vitro/In Vivo)References
Loranthus micranthus, Viscum
album
HypertensionFlavonoids (e.g., quercetin)
and phenolic Acids
Vasorelaxant effects, ACE-inhibitory activity, antioxidant activity[125,126]
Viscum albumCancer/TumorsMistletoe lectins (MLs) and
viscotoxins
Induction of apoptosis in cancer cells, immunomodulation (e.g., increased NK cell activity, cytokine release), direct cytotoxic/cytolytic effects[124]
Viscum album, Phragmanthera spp.Inflammation,
arthritis
Flavonoids and phenolic
acids
Inhibition of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6), COX-2 enzyme inhibition, reduction in oxidative stress[127]
Viscum albumDiabetesPolysaccharides and
flavonoids
Alpha-glucosidase and alpha-amylase inhibitory activity, improved glucose tolerance[128]

10. Toxicology and Safety of Mistletoe Preparations: A Critical Analysis of Evidence and Gaps

According to Briskin [129], there has been an unwavering increase in the use and application of products derived from medicinal plants and scientific studies. Medicinal plants are envisioned to generate potent bioactive compounds crucial for enhancing human health and well-being. Although remarkable success has been achieved in the detection, treatment and management of diseases using conventional medicine, many patients still resort to orthodox medicine since many of them are believed/reputed to offer a complete cure with less serious side effects [129]. Synthetic drugs usually consist of a single chemical, while medicinal plants can contain complex mixtures of 400 or more chemicals. It is comparatively easy to figure out the activity and side effects of a single chemical, but there is no way scientists can map all the complex interactions and synergies that might be taking place between the various chemicals found in a plant, or crude plant extract containing these chemicals which is used traditionally [101]. However, most of these plants have been ingested indiscriminately without considering their toxicological adversities and safety. The advancement of technology has enabled scientists to detect minute amounts of carcinogenic and toxic chemicals in herbs and recognize or evaluate potentially hazardous effects of some of the herbs that have been used in traditional medicine for centuries [101]. The growing use of medicinal plants like mistletoe is driven by the perception of being “natural” and safer than synthetic drugs. However, the complex phytochemical nature of plant extracts makes a comprehensive toxicological profile challenging to establish. While mistletoe preparations have a long history of use, a critical analysis reveals significant gaps in our understanding of their safety, particularly regarding long-term toxicity, dose-dependent effects, and the robustness of clinical trial data. Subsequently, there are insufficient preclinical, in vitro and/or in vivo studies on the application, toxicity and safety of mistletoe preparations and/or extracts.
Existing preclinical and clinical studies primarily report that mistletoe extracts, such as Iscador® and Helixor®, are well-tolerated in the short term [130,131,132]. The most commonly documented adverse effects are mild and localized, including reactions at the injection site, subfebrile temperatures, and transient eosinophilia [133,134]. Studies by Huber et al. [135] and Bergmann et al. [136] confirm that these effects are dose-dependent, linked to the key active compound, mistletoe lectin (ML). According to Huber et al. [132,133], repetitive and continuous subcutaneous injections of ML containing mistletoe products are known to cause blood eosinophilia, and allergic reactions are known as possible side effects (Table 8). The long-standing human use, spanning over 80 years, provides a degree of clinical reassurance against acute, severe toxicity [129]. Although there seems to be short-term safety, the existing toxicological information is inadequate for a conclusive assessment of safety. The main shortcoming is the absence of thorough, long-term toxicology research. The majority of early research studies concentrated on immediate harmful effects. Important questions that still need answers are: “What are the overall effects of long-term administration beneath the skin on organ systems, particularly the liver and kidneys? Are there potential risks related to the immune system from prolonged changes to its activity, especially in individuals who do not have cancer or those with weakened immune systems?“ Moreover, the harmful effects of mistletoe compounds and the likelihood of interactions between herbs and drugs have not been thoroughly studied. This is a significant lapse, considering that cancer patients who use mistletoe as an additional treatment are probably also taking other medications, which could lead to interactions that might change the effectiveness or harmfulness of either treatment. While over 40 clinical trials have been conducted, their findings on efficacy remain “controversial” [130] largely due to methodological weaknesses that also impede a clear safety analysis. Many trials are limited by small sample sizes, short duration periods, and a lack of rigorous adverse events monitoring protocols focused on subjective, mild symptoms. A critical gap is the absence of large-scale, prospective, long-term cohort studies specifically designed to detect rare but serious adverse events. Table 8 provides the heterogeneity of preparations, dosages, and standardization methods [108]. While useful, it highlights another issue and/or existing challenge. This variability makes it nearly impossible to perform meaningful cross-study comparisons or meta-analyses to establish a reliable dose-toxicity relationship. For instance, the safety profile of a recombinant ML preparation [136] may not be directly comparable to that of a whole fermented extract such as Iscador®.
Current literature indicates that mistletoe extracts possess a favorable short-term safety profile within a limited dosage range. Nevertheless, this should not be interpreted as a lack of danger. The notable research deficiencies identified are the absence of long-term toxicological data, insufficient exploration of herb-drug interactions, and the methodological constraints of current clinical trials, which underscores an urgent necessity for a new wave of focused study. Future research should emphasize meticulously conducted toxic kinetic studies and comprehensive, large-scale clinical trials that systematically assess safety as a key outcome. Therefore, the promise of mistletoe therapy can only be balanced with a complete and scientifically valid comprehensiveness of its risks through such robust investigations.

11. Commercial Status of Mistletoe Preparations and Regulatory Environment

The development of mistletoe research to produce marketable products is mainly appearing in Europe, where these solutions are effectively incorporated into cancer treatment, especially in anthroposophic medicine. Nonetheless, the process of commercialization encounters obstacles, such as challenges in the widespread cultivation for decorative uses and issues related to quality assurance due to contamination in herbal products. Mistletoe is partially commercialized; however, prominent products such as Iscador® (Weleda AG, Switzerland), Helixor® (Helixor Heilmittel GmbH, Germany), and AbnobaViscum® (Abnoba GmbH, Germany) are produced in accordance with rigorous quality control standards and are officially acknowledged as pharmaceuticals with designated regulatory classifications [137].
Within the European Union (EU), mistletoe products are generally classified as “anthroposophic medicinal products” in accordance with Directive 2001/83/EC [138]. This status recognizes their historical traditional usage. For certain purposes, like enhancing the quality of life and lessening symptoms in cancer patients, some products have received approval due to clinical evidence [139]. The production method is consistent, and every batch undergoes strict testing for biological effects (such as lectin levels) and safety [138]. Anthroposophic preparations play a significant role in mistletoe therapy, surpassing mere branding to reflect a unique philosophical approach and production method. These preparations are developed with a focus on the host tree’s specific traits, affecting their medicinal value. They undergo a fermentation process that modifies their toxicity and boosts immune effects. Unlike standard pharmaceuticals, these products are standardized based on the manufacturing process. They also have a long history of clinical use in integrative medicine.
In the United States (US), the regulatory environment is significantly different. Mistletoe extracts do not have approval from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to be used as prescription medications for cancer therapy. They are, however, accessible as dietary supplements according to the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA) of 1994. This classification indicates that they cannot be legally sold with statements suggesting they can diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any illness. As a result, their application in cancer treatment is regarded as “off-label” and is typically not included in coverage by most insurance policies. Clinical research in the US is currently active, with a focus on producing strong data needed for possible FDA approval as an additional treatment option [139].
There are factors associated with commercialization and applications of mistletoe preparations, but not limited to, global markets and challenges. The worldwide market for mistletoe products is specialized but steady, influenced by demand from Central Europe [124]. Significant obstacles to broader commercialization include regulatory challenges, the complexity of standardization and scientific dispute. The biological activity varies greatly depending on the host tree, the time of harvest, and the method of extraction, presenting a significant challenge for standardizing production between batches. Obtaining authorization as a prescription medication in new markets such as the US necessitates extensive, randomized controlled trials that are both expensive and time-intensive [140]. The continuing discussion about clinical effectiveness, as mentioned earlier, still acts as an obstacle to the broad approval by the established oncology community [141].

12. Conclusions and Recommendations

In the current study, a few of the many mistletoe species belonging to the families Loranthaceae and Viscaceae have been intensively explored and reported on. Their distribution and occurrence, nutritional and phytochemical composition as well as ethnomedicinal potential and applications have been recognized. The general link between parasitic infection and increased tree mortality rates is well established and the modifications of host processes following mistletoe infection are increasingly well understood. Most studies on the phytonutrient profiling of mistletoe are comparative investigations focused on the effects of mistletoe-host interaction and seasonal variations. Additionally, many in vitro studies are aimed at assessing the effects of solvent types and extraction techniques on the phytonutrient profiling of mistletoe. These gaps need to be filled through robust research.
It is evident that mistletoe species play a vital role in maintaining and improving human health, due to their nutritional and phytochemical constituents. The quantities of these nutritional and phytochemical constituents are highly influenced by both biotic and abiotic factors, with the host tree playing a major role. The impact of the host tree starts at the most basic level by determining the diet of the mistletoe through the makeup of the xylem sap. This directly influences its nutritional worth. Following this, the distinctive blend of nutrients, along with possible signaling molecules, generates a particular biochemical setting that influences the production and storage of its specialized phytochemicals. Grasping these processes is crucial for the growth and standardization of mistletoe extracts, as selecting the appropriate host tree significantly influences the chemical properties and healing capabilities of the resulting product. Mistletoe species, both from the Loranthaceae and Viscaceae families, have been shown to exhibit significant concentrations of a wide range of bioactive compounds with strong antioxidant activity that can be employed in ethnomedicine for the treatment of a variety of communicable and non-communicable ailments. Mistletoe extracts have shown that they can be used for treating various ailments; however, only a few of these scientific findings are supported and validated by clinical studies. Therefore, there is a need to continue to investigate, through robust clinical studies, the potential applications and uses of mistletoe extracts to approve and validate the non-clinical claims. Moreover, intensive research is imperative and needed to fully comprehend the effects (short- and long-term) and optimal uses of mistletoe extracts. Ensuring the efficacy and safe use through quality control and standardization of mistletoe extracts and/or products is equally crucial. There is scant literature covering the direct effects of biotic factors such as climatic conditions and habitat structure and heterogeneity, and abiotic factors including host-health and vigor, and water and nutrient availability on the nutritional and phenolic compositions of mistletoe species. Therefore, the climate-mistletoe, climate-host and mistletoe-host health interactive effects on biochemical compounds (nutrients and phytochemicals) need to be investigated and documented.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and writing—original draft, M.G.M.; Critically reviewing the idea and the manuscript and editing the language, S.M.; Guided the work, critically reviewed the manuscript and improved the language. J.V.S. and A.R.N.; Funding acquisition, A.R.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Department of Science, Technology and Innovations (DSI) of the South African Government (Grant number DSI/CON C2235/2021).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the DSTI for funding this study. The authors would also like to extend their deepest gratitude to Lee A. Warren for assistance and support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Gurib-Fakim, A. Medicinal plants: Traditions of yesterday and drugs of tomorrow. Mol. Asp. Med. 2006, 27, 1–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Oosthuizen, D.; Balkwill, K. Viscum songimveloensis, a new species of Mistletoe from South Africa. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2018, 115, 194–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Glatzel, G.; Geils, B.W. Mistletoe ecophysiology: Host–parasite interactions. Botany 2009, 87, 10–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Maul, K.; Krug, M.; Nickrent, D.L.; Müller, K.F.; Quandt, D.; Wicke, S. Morphology, geographic distribution, and host preferences are poor predictors of phylogenetic relatedness in Mistletoe genus Viscum L. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2019, 131, 106–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kuijt, J. The Biology of Parasitic Flowering Plants; University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA, 1969. [Google Scholar]
  6. Riopel, J.L.; Musselman, L.J. Experimental initiation of haustoria in Agalinis purpurea (Scrophulariaceae). Am. J. Bot. 1979, 66, 570–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hibberd, J.M.; Dieter Jeschke, W. Solute flux into parasitic plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2001, 52, 2043–2049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vidal-Russell, R.; Nickrent, D.L. The first Mistletoes: Origins of aerial parasitism in Santalales. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2008, 47, 523–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Westwood, J.H.; Yoder, J.I.; Timko, M.P.; Depamphilis, C.W. The evolution of parasitism in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2010, 15, 227–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Polhill, R.M.; Wiens, D. Mistletoes of Africa Royal Botanic Gardens; Kew Pages: Chicago, IL, USA, 1998; pp. 237–238. [Google Scholar]
  11. Büssing, A. Introduction: History of Mistletoe uses. In Mistletoe; CRC Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2000; pp. 17–22. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kirkup, D.W.; Polhill, R.M.; Wiens, D. Viscum in the context of its family, Viscaceae, and its diversity in Africa. In Mistletoe; CRC Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2000; pp. 23–46. [Google Scholar]
  13. Tennakoon, K.U.; Chak, W.H.; Lim, L.B.; Bolin, J.F. Mineral nutrition of the hyperparasitic Mistletoe Viscum articulatum Burm.F. (Viscaceae) in tropical Brunei Darussalam. Plant Species Biol. 2014, 29, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Omoruyi, B.O.; Onyeneke, E.C. Proximate composition, phytochemical screening and elemental analysis of Mistletoe (Tapinanthus bangwensis) leaves. NISEB J. 2019, 11, 19–22. [Google Scholar]
  15. Isikhuemen, E.M.; Olisaemeka, U.O.; Oyibotie, G.O. Host specificity and phytochemical constituents of Mistletoe and twigs of parasitized plants: Implications for blanket application of Mistletoe as cure-all medicine. J. Med. Herbs Ethnomed. 2020, 6, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. García-García, J.D.; Anguiano-Cabello, J.C.; Arredondo-Valdés, R.; Candido Del Toro, C.A.; Martínez-Hernández, J.L.; Segura-Ceniceros, E.P.; Govea-Salas, M.; González-Chávez, M.L.; Ramos-González, R.; Esparza-González, S.C.; et al. Phytochemical characterization of Viscum album subs. austriacum as Mexican Mistletoe plants with antimicrobial activity. Plants 2021, 10, 1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Oloruntola, O.D.; Ayodele, S.O. Phytochemical, proximate and mineral composition, antioxidant and antidiabetic properties evaluation and comparison of Mistletoe leaves from Moringa and Kolanut trees. Turk. J. Agric. Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 10, 1524–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Nwoke, S.C.; Imaga, N.O.A.; Omojufehinsi, M.; Magbagbeola, A.O.; Ebuehi, O.A.T.; Okafor, U.A. Nutritional and phytochemical properties of aqueous leaf extract of Mistletoe (Tapinanthus Bangwensis) grown on Orange tree. Univ. Lagos J. Basic Med. Sci. 2023, 10, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Marvibaigi, M.; Supriyanto, E.; Amini, N.; Abdul Majid, F.A.; Jaganathan, S.K. Preclinical and clinical effects of Mistletoe against breast cancer. BioMed Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 785479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Norton, D.A.; De Lange, P.J. Host specificity in parasitic Mistletoes (Loranthaceae) in New Zealand. Funct. Ecol. 1999, 13, 552–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Watson, D.M. Mistletoe, a keystone resource in forests and woodlands worldwide. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2001, 32, 219–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Barlow, B.A. Biogeography of Loranthaceae and Viscaceae. In The Biology of Mistletoes; Calder, M., Bernhardt, P., Eds.; Academic Press: Sydney, Australia, 1983; pp. 19–46. [Google Scholar]
  23. Sangüesa-Barreda, G.; Linares, J.C.; Camarero, J.J. Mistletoe effects on Scots pine decline following drought events: Insights from within-tree spatial patterns, growth and carbohydrates. Tree Physiol. 2012, 32, 585–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Pietrzak, W.; Nowak, R. Impact of harvest conditions and host-tree species on chemical composition and antioxidant activity of extracts from Viscum album L. Molecules 2021, 26, 3741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Skrypnik, L.; Maslennikov, P.; Feduraev, P.; Pungin, A.; Belov, N. Ecological and landscape factors affecting the spread of European Mistletoe (Viscum album L.) in urban areas (A Case Study of the Kaliningrad City, Russia). Plants 2020, 9, 394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Iversen, J. Viscum, Hedera and Ilex as climate indicators: A contribution to the study of the post-glacial temperature climate. Geol. Föreningen I Stockh. Förhandlingar 1944, 66, 463–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jeffree, C.E.; Jeffree, E.P. Redistribution of the potential geographical ranges of Mistletoe and Colorado beetle in Europe in response to the temperature component of climate change. Funct. Ecol. 1996, 10, 562–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Varga, I.; Poczai, P.; Tiborcz, V.; Aranyi, N.R.; Baltazár, T.; Bartha, D.; Pejchal, M.; Hyvönen, J. Changes in the distribution of European Mistletoe (Viscum album) in Hungary during the last hundred years. Folia Geobot. 2014, 49, 559–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Skre, O. The regional distribution of vascular plants in Scandinavia with requirements for high summer temperatures. Nor. J. Bot. 1981, 26, 295–318. [Google Scholar]
  30. Hawksworth, F.G. Crop loss assessment. In Proceedings of EC Stakman Commemorative Symposium; University of Minnesota: Minneapolis, MN, USA, 1980; Volume 7. [Google Scholar]
  31. Hawksworth, F.G. Mistletoes as Forest Parasites. In The Biology of Mistletoes; Calder, M., Bernhardt, P., Eds.; Academic Press: Sydney, Australia, 1983; pp. 317–333. [Google Scholar]
  32. Hawksworth, F.G.; Wiens, D.; Geils, B.W.; Nisley, R.G. Dwarf Mistletoes: Biology, Pathology, and Systematics (No. 709); US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: Washington, DC, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  33. Zorofchian Moghadamtousi, S.; Hajrezaei, M.; Abdul Kadir, H.; Zandi, K. Loranthus micranthus Linn. biological activities and phytochemistry. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2013, 2013, 273712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wicker, E.F.; Leaphart, C.D. Fire and dwarf Mistletoe (Arceuthobium spp.) relationships in the northern Rocky Mountains. In Proceedings of the 1974 Tall Timbers Fire Ecology Conference, Portland, OR, USA, 16–17 October 1976; Tall Timbers Research Station: Tallahassee, FL, USA, 1976; pp. 279–298. [Google Scholar]
  35. Shea, K.R.; Howard, B. In Western Forest pest conditions. In Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Western Forestry and Conservation Association, Western Forestry and Conservation Association, Portland, OR, USA, December 1969; Volume 59, pp. 25–32. [Google Scholar]
  36. Barbu, C. The incidence and distribution of white Mistletoe (Viscum album ssp. abietis) on Silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) stands from Eastern Carpathians. Ann. For. Res. 2010, 53, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Becker, H. European Mistletoe: Taxonomy, Host-Trees, Parts Used, Physiology, 1st ed.; CRC Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2000; pp. 47–60. [Google Scholar]
  38. March, W.A.; Watson, D.M. The contribution of Mistletoes to nutrient returns: Evidence for a critical role in nutrient cycling. Austral Ecol. 2010, 35, 713–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bartels, S.F.; Chen, H.Y. Mechanisms regulating epiphytic plant diversity. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2012, 31, 391–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cooney, S.J.; Watson, D.M. An experimental approach to understanding the use of Mistletoe as a nest substrate for birds: Nest predation. Wildl. Res. 2008, 35, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  41. Bowen, M.E.; McAlpine, C.A.; House, A.P.; Smith, G.C. Agricultural landscape modification increases the abundance of an important food resource: Mistletoes, birds and brigalow. Biol. Conserv. 2009, 142, 122–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Griebel, A.; Watson, D.; Pendall, E. Mistletoe, friend and foe: Synthesizing ecosystem implications of Mistletoe infection. Environ. Res. Lett. 2017, 12, 115012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. March, W.A.; Watson, D.M. Parasites boost productivity: Effects of Mistletoe on litter fall dynamics in a temperate Australian forest. Oecologia 2007, 154, 339–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ndagurwa, H.G.; Dube, J.S.; Mlambo, D.; Mawanza, M. The influence of Mistletoes on the litter-layer arthropod abundance and diversity in a semi-arid savannah, Southwest Zimbabwe. Plant Soil 2014, 383, 291–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mellado, A.; Morillas, L.; Gallardo, A.; Zamora, R. Temporal dynamic of parasite-mediated linkages between the forest canopy and soil processes and the microbial community. New Phytol. 2016, 211, 1382–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kuijt, J.; Hansen, B. Loranthaceae: Loranthaceae Juss., Ann. Mus. Hist. Nat. Paris 12: 292 (1808) (‘Loranthaea’), nom. cons.; Barlow, Flora Males. I, 13: 209–401 (1997); Polhill and Wiens, Mistletoes of Africa, Royal Bot. Gard. Kew (1998). Loranthaceae subfam. Loranthoideae Eaton, Bot. Dict., ed. 4: 37 (1836). Elytranthaceae Tiegh. (1896). Nuytsiaceae Tiegh. (1896). Gaiadendraceae Tiegh. Ex Nakai (1952). Psittacanthaceae Nakai (1952). In Flowering Plants, Eudicots: Santalales, Balanophorales; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 73–119. [Google Scholar]
  47. Anderson, S.J.; Braby, M.F. Invertebrate diversity associated with tropical Mistletoe in a suburban landscape from northern Australia. North. Territ. Nat. 2009, 21, 2–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Watson, D.M.; Herring, M. Mistletoe as a keystone resource: An experimental test. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2012, 279, 3853–3860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Watson, D.M. Disproportionate declines in ground-foraging insectivorous birds after Mistletoe removal. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0142992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Press, M.C.; Phoenix, G.K. Impacts of parasitic plants on natural communities. New Phytol. 2005, 166, 737–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Hatcher, M.J.; Dick, J.T.; Dunn, A.M. Diverse effects of parasites in ecosystems: Linking interdependent processes. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2012, 10, 186–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Njoya, H.K.; Christina, O.U.; Uche, I.H. A comparative assessment of the in vitro antioxidant potential of Tapinanthus preussii (African Mistletoe) leaf aqueous and ethanolic extracts. Int. J. Pharmacogn. Pharm. Sci. 2018, 6, 32–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Petropoulos, S.A.; Pereira, C.; Tzortzakis, N.; Barros, L.; Ferreira, I.C. Nutritional value and bioactive compounds characterization of plant parts from Cynara cardunculus L. (Asteraceae) cultivated in central Greece. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ogunmefun, O.T.; Fasola, T.R.; Saba, A.B.; Oridupa, O.A. The ethnobotanical, phytochemical and mineral analyses of Phragmanthera incana (Klotzsch), a species of Mistletoe growing on three plant hosts in South-Western Nigeria. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2013, 9, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Njoya, H.K.; Onyeneke, C.E.; Okwuonu, C.U.; Erifeta, G.O. Phytochemical, proximate and elemental analysis of the African Mistletoe (Tapinanthus preussii) crude aqueous and ethanolic leaf extracts. Extraction 1993, 21, 22. [Google Scholar]
  56. Chizoruo, I.F.; Onyekachi, I.B.; Odinaka, N.P.; Chinyelu, E.M. Phytochemical, FTIR and elemental studies of African Mistlotoe (Viscum album) leaves on Cola nitida from South-Eastern Nigeria. World Sci. News 2019, 132, 84–97. [Google Scholar]
  57. Barberaki, M.; Kintzios, S. Accumulation of selected macronutrients in Mistletoe tissue cultures: Effect of medium composition and explant source. Sci. Hortic. 2002, 95, 133–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Türe, C.; Böcük, H.; Aşan, Z. Nutritional relationships between hemiparasitic Mistletoe and some of its deciduous hosts in different habitats. Biologia 2010, 65, 859–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Bannister, P.; Strong, G.L.; Andrew, I. Differential accumulation of nutrient elements in some New Zealand Mistletoes and their hosts. Funct. Plant Biol. 2002, 29, 1309–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Schulze, E.D.; Lange, O.L.; Ziegler, H.; Gebauer, G. Carbon and nitrogen isotope ratios of Mistletoes growing on nitrogen and non-nitrogen fixing hosts and on CAM plants in the Namib Desert confirm partial heterotrophy. Oecologia 1991, 88, 457–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Makinta, A.A.; Igwebuike, J.U.; Kwari, I.D.; Mohammed, G. Determination of proximate composition, some anti-nutritional factors and amino acid profile of Mistletoe leaf (Tapinanthus bangwensis) meal. Niger. J. Anim. Prod. 2023, 6, 909–913. [Google Scholar]
  62. Kim, C.W.; An, C.H.; Lee, H.S.; Yi, J.S.; Cheong, E.J.; Lim, S.H.; Kim, H.Y. Proximate and mineral components of Viscum album var. coloratum grown on eight different host-tree species. J. For. Res. 2019, 30, 1245–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Mnisi, C.M.; Ramantsi, R.; Ravhuhali, K. Chemical composition and in vitro dry matter degradability of Mistletoe (Viscum verrucosum (Harv.)) on Vachellia nilotica (L.) in North West Province of South Africa. Trop. Agric. 2019, 96, 53–60. [Google Scholar]
  64. Umudi, E.Q.; Umudi, O.P.; Diakparomre, O.; Obiagwe, J.; Nwakwanogo, B.E. Analysis of the Mineral Nutritional and Phytochemical Composition of Mistletoe Leaves (Loranthaceae). Fac. Nat. Appl. Sci. J. Appl. Chem. Sci. Res. 2024, 2, 6–10. [Google Scholar]
  65. Ciftci, B.; Karaman, S.; Kamalak, A.; Kaplan, M. Effects of Hosting Trees on Chemical Composition, Minerals, Amino Acid, Fatty Acid Composition and Gas-Methane Production of Mistletoe (Viscum album) Leaves. Waste Biomass Valorization 2024, 12, 6803–6812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Lo Gullo, M.A.; Glatzel, G.; Devkota, M.; Raimondo, F.; Trifilò, P.; Richter, H. Mistletoes and mutant albino shoots on woody plants as mineral nutrient traps. Ann. Bot. 2012, 109, 1101–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Okubamichael, D.Y.; Griffiths, M.E.; Ward, D. Host specificity, nutrient and water dynamics of Mistletoe Viscum rotundifolium and its potential host species in the Kalahari of South Africa. J. Arid. Environ. 2011, 75, 898–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Bowie, M.; Ward, D. Water and nutrient status of Mistletoe Plicosepalus acaciae parasitic on isolated Negev Desert populations of Acacia raddiana differing in level of mortality. J. Arid. Environ. 2004, 56, 487–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Okubamichael, D.Y. Host Specificity of the Hemiparasitic Mistletoe, Agelanthus natalitius. Ph.D. Thesis, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  70. Panvini, A.D.; Eickmeier, W.G. Nutrient and water relations of Mistletoe Phoradendron leucarpum (Viscaceae): How tightly are they integrated? Am. J. Bot. 1993, 80, 872–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Umucalilar, H.D.; Gülşen, N.; Coşkun, B.E.H.İ.Ç.; Hayirli, A.; Dural, H.Ü.S.E.Y.İ.N. Nutrient composition of Mistletoe (Viscum album) and its nutritive value for ruminant animals. Agrofor. Syst. 2007, 71, 77–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Bassey, P.; Sowemimo, A.; Lasore, O.; Spies, L.; van de Venter, M. Biological activities and nutritional value of Tapinanthus bangwensis leaves. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2012, 11, 13821–13826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Xing, J.J.; Jiang, D.H.; Yang, Z.; Guo, X.N.; Zhu, K.X. effect of humidity-controlled dehydration on microbial growth and quality characteristics of fresh wet noodles. Foods 2021, 10, 844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Ohikhena, F.U.; Wintola, O.A.; Afolayan, A.J. Proximate composition and mineral analysis of Phragmanthera capitata (Sprengel) Balle, a Mistletoe growing on rubber tree. Res. J. Bot. 2017, 12, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Patil, S.P.; Goswami, A.; Kalia, K.; Kate, A.S. Plant-Derived Bioactive Peptides: A Treatment to Cure Diabetes. Int. J. Pept. Res. Ther. 2020, 26, 955–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ishiwu, C.N.; Obiegbuna, J.E.; Aniagolu, N.M. Evaluation of chemical properties of Mistletoe leaves from three different trees (Avocado, African Oil Bean and Kola). Niger. Food J. 2013, 31, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Tarfa, F.D.; Amos, S.; Temple, V.J.; Binda, L.; Emeje, M.; Obodozie, O.; Wambebe, C.; Gamaniel, K. Effect of the aqueous extract of African Mistletoe, Tapinanthus sessilifolius (P. Beauv) van Tiegh leaf on gastrointestinal muscle activity. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 2002, 40, 571–574. [Google Scholar]
  78. Madibela, O.R.; Boitumelo, W.S.; Letso, M. Chemical composition and in vitro dry matter digestibility of four parasitic plants (Tapinanthus lugardii, Erianthenum ngamicum, Viscum rotundifolium and Viscum verrucosum) in Botswana. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2000, 84, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Akinmoladun, A.C.; Ibukun, E.O.; Afor, E.; Obuotor, E.M.; Farombi, E.O. Phytochemical constituent and antioxidant activity of extract from the leaves of Ocimum gratissimum. Sci. Res. Essay 2007, 2, 163–166. [Google Scholar]
  80. Jan, R.; Lubna, A.S.; Khan, M.A.; Kim, K.M. Effect of Mineral Nutrition and PGRs on Biosynthesis and Distribution of Secondary Plant Metabolites under Abiotic Stress. In Medicinal Plants: Their Response to Abiotic Stress; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2023; pp. 287–314. [Google Scholar]
  81. Senthilkumaran, S.; Meenakshisundaram, R.; Thirumalaikolundusubramanian, P. Plant toxins and the heart. In Heart and Toxins; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2015; pp. 151–174. [Google Scholar]
  82. Hill, A.F. Economic botany. A textbook of useful plants and plant products. In Economic Botany, 2nd ed.; McGraw-Hill Publishing Co., Ltd.: London, UK, 1937; pp. x + 592. [Google Scholar]
  83. Martin Cordero, C.; Gil Serrano, A.M.; Ayuso Gonzalez, M.J. Transfer of bipiperidyl and quinolizidinevalkaloids to Viscum cruciatum Sieber (Loranthaceae) hemiparasitic on Retama sphaerocarpa Boissier (Leguminosae). J. Chem. Ecol. 1993, 19, 2389–2393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Ohashi, K.; Winarno, H.; Mukai, M.; Inoue, M.; Prana, M.S.; Simanjuntak, P.; Shibuya, H. Indonesian medicinal plants. XXV. Cancer cell invasion inhibitory effects of chemical constituents in the parasitic plant Scurrula atropurpurea (Loranthaceae). Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2003, 51, 343–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Deeni, Y.Y.; Sadiq, N.M. Antimicrobial properties and phytochemical constituents of the leaves of African Mistletoe (Tapinanthus dodoneifolius (DC) Danser (Loranthaceae): An ethnomedicinal plant of Hausaland, Northern Nigeria. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2002, 83, 235–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Ukwueze, S.E.; Osadebe, P.O.; Ezenobi, N.O. Bioassay-guided evaluation of the antibacterial activity of Loranthus species of the African Mistletoe. Int. J. Pharm. Biomed. Res. 2013, 4, 79–82. [Google Scholar]
  87. Szurpnicka, A.; Zjawiony, J.K.; Szterk, A. Therapeutic potential of Mistletoe in CNS-related neurological disorders and the chemical composition of Viscum species. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2019, 231, 241–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Vlad, D.C.; Popescu, R.; Dumitrascu, V.; Cimporescu, A.; Vlad, C.S.; Vágvölgyi, C.; Krisch, J.; Dehelean, C.; Horhat, F.G. Phyto-components identification in Mistletoe (Viscum album) young leaves and branches, by GC-MS and antiproliferative effect on HEPG2 and McF7 cell lines. Farm. J. 2016, 64, 82. [Google Scholar]
  89. Osadebe, P.O.; Ukwueze, S.E. A comparative study of the phytochemical and anti-microbial properties of the Eastern Nigerian specie of African Mistletoe (Loranthus micranthus) sourced from different host-trees. Bioresearch 2004, 2, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Schötterl, S.; Miemietz, J.T.; Ilina, E.I.; Wirsik, N.M.; Ehrlich, I.; Gall, A.; Huber, S.M.; Lentzen, H.; Mittelbronn, M.; Naumann, U. Mistletoe-based drugs work in synergy with radio-chemotherapy in the treatment of glioma in vitro and in vivo in glioblastoma bearing Mice. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2019, 2019, 1376140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Vergara-Barberán, M.; Lerma-García, M.J.; Nicoletti, M.; Simó-Alfonso, E.F.; Herrero-Martínez, J.M.; Fasoli, E.; Righetti, P.G. Proteomic fingerprinting of Mistletoe (Viscum album L.) via combinatorial peptide ligand libraries and mass spectrometry analysis. J. Proteom. 2017, 164, 52–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Peñaloza, E.; Holandino, C.; Scherr, C.; Araujo, P.I.; Borges, R.M.; Urech, K.; Baumgartner, S.; Garrett, R. Comprehensive metabolome analysis of fermented aqueous extracts of Viscum album L. by liquid chromatography−high resolution tandem mass spectrometry. Molecules 2020, 25, 4006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Kaurinovic, B.; Vastag, D. Flavonoids and phenolic acids as potential natural antioxidants. Antioxidants 2019, 2, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  94. Luczkiewicz, M.; Cisowski, W.; Kaiser, P.; Ochocka, R.; Piotrowski, A. Comparative analysis of phenolic acids in Mistletoe plants from various hosts. Acta Pol. Pharm. 2001, 58, 373–379. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  95. Haas, K.; Bauer, M.; Wollenweber, E. Cuticular waxes and flavonol aglycones of Mistletoes. Z. Naturforsch. C J. Biosci. 2003, 58, 464–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Pietrzak, W.; Nowak, R.; Gawlik-Dziki, U.; Lemieszek, M.; Rzeski, W. LC-ESI-MS/MS identification of biologically active phenolic compounds in Mistletoe berry extracts from different host-trees. Molecules 2017, 22, 624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Zhang, R.Z.; Zhao, J.T.; Wang, W.Q.; Fan, R.H.; Rong, R.; Yu, Z.G.; Zhao, Y.L. Metabolomics-based comparative analysis of the effects of host and environment on Viscum coloratum metabolites and antioxidative activities. J. Pharm. Anal. 2021, 12, 243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. 98Obatomi, D.K.; Bikomo, E.O.; Temple, V.J. Anti-diabetic properties of the African Mistletoe in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. J. Ethnopharmacol. 1994, 43, 13–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Rout, G.R.; Samantaray, S.; Das, P. In vitro manipulation and propagation of medicinal plants. Biotechnol. Adv. 2000, 18, 91–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Mishra, K.P.; Ganju, L.; Sairam, M.; Banerjee, P.K.; Sawhney, R.C. A review of high throughput technology for the screening of natural products. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2008, 62, 94–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. George, P. Concerns regarding the safety and toxicity of medicinal plants-An overview. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2011, 1, 40–44. [Google Scholar]
  102. Ojewole, J.; Kamadyaapa, D.R.; Gondwe, M.M.; Moodley, K.; Musabayane, C.T. Cardiovascular effects of Persea americana Mill (Lauraceae) (Avocado) aqueous leaf extract in experimental animals. Cardiovasc. J. S. Afr. 2007, 18, 69. [Google Scholar]
  103. Ohikhena, F.U.; Wintola, O.A.; Afolayan, A.J. Quantitative phytochemical constituents and antioxidant activities of Mistletoe, Phragmanthera capitata (sprengel) Balle extracted with different solvents. Pharmacogn. Res. 2018, 10, 16. [Google Scholar]
  104. Mahady, G.B. Global harmonization of herbal health claims. J. Nutr. 2001, 131, 1120–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Kafaru, E. ‘Mistletoe, an example of an all-purpose herb’ Herbal Remedies. The Guardian Newspaper, London, UK, 3 June 1993; Volume 3. [Google Scholar]
  106. Nwude, N.; Ibrahim, M.A. Plants used in traditional veterinary medical practice in Nigeria. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Ther. 1980, 3, 261–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Kovacs, E.; Link, S.; Toffol-Schmidt, U. Cytostatic and cytocidal effects of Mistletoe (Viscum album L.) aqueous extract Iscador. Arzneimittelforschung 2006, 56, 467–473. [Google Scholar]
  108. Gabius, H.J.; Gabius, S.; Joshi, S.S.; Koch, B.; Schroeder, M.; Manzke, W.M.; Westerhausen, M. From ill-defined extracts to the immunomodulatory lectin: Will there be a reason for oncological application of Mistletoe? Planta Medica 1994, 60, 2–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Park, W.B.; Lyu, S.Y.; Kim, J.H.; Choi, S.H.; Chung, H.K.; Ahn, S.H.; Hong, S.Y.; Yoon, T.J.; Choi, M.J. Inhibition of tumor growth and metastasis by Korean Mistletoe lectins is associated with apoptosis and antiangiogenesis. Cancer Biother. Radiopharm. 2001, 16, 439–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Urech, K.; Schaller, G.; Jäggy, C. Viscotoxins, Mistletoe lectins and their isoforms in Mistletoe (Viscum album L.) extracts Iscador. Arzneimittelforschung 2006, 56, 428–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Heinzerling, L.; Von Baehr, V.; Liebenthal, C.; Von Baehr, R.; Volk, H.D. Immunologic effector mechanisms of a standardized Mistletoe extract on the function of human monocytes and lymphocytes in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo. J. Clin. Immunol. 2006, 26, 347–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Elluru, S.; Huyen, J.V.; Bharath Wootla, B.W.; Delignat, S.; Prost, F.; Negi, V.S.; Kaveri, S.V. Tumor regressive effects of Viscum album preparations. In Proceedings of the Exploration of Immunomodulatory Mechanisms, International Symposium, New Directions in Cancer Management, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 6–8 June 2007. [Google Scholar]
  113. Büssing, A. Immune modulation using Mistletoe (Viscum album L.) extracts Iscador. Arzneimittelforschung 2006, 56, 508–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Schink, M.; Tröger, W.; Dabidian, A.; Goyert, A.; Scheuerecker, H.; Meyer, J.; Fischer, I.U.; Glaser, F. Mistletoe extract reduces the surgical suppression of natural killer cell activity in cancer patients. A randomized phase III trial. Res. Complement. Med. 2007, 14, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Engdal, S.; Nilsen, O.G. Inhibition of P-glycoprotein in Caco-2 cells: Effects of herbal remedies frequently used by cancer patients. Xenobiotica 2008, 38, 559–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Liu, B.; Bian, H.J.; Bao, J.K. Plant lectins: Potential antineoplastic drugs from bench to clinic. Cancer Lett. 2010, 287, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Sofowora, L.A. Medicinal Plants and Traditional Medicine in Africa; Spectrum Books Ltd.: Ibadan, Nigeria, 1993; pp. 55–71. [Google Scholar]
  118. Miller, N.D. Antioxidant flavonoids: Structure, function and clinical usage. Altern. Med. Rev. 1996, 1, 103–111. [Google Scholar]
  119. Büssing, A.; Schietzel, M. Apoptosis-inducing properties of Viscum album L. extracts from different host-trees correlate with their content of toxic Mistletoe lectins. Anticancer Res. 1999, 19, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  120. Khammash, A. “Holly Parasite or Christmas Mistletoe” Jordan Times Weekender. 2005. Available online: http://www.jordanflora.com/holly.htm (accessed on 16 April 2024).
  121. Atewolara-Odule, O.C.; Aiyelaagbe, O.O.; Ashidi, J.S. Biological and phytochemical investigation of extracts of Tapinanthus bangwensis (Engl. and K. Krause) Danser (Loranthaceae) grown in Nigeria. Afr. J. Sci. Nat. 2018, 6, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Shanavaskhan, A.E.; Sivadasan, M.; Alfarhan, A.H.; Thomas, J. Ethnomedicinal aspects of angiospermic epiphytes and parasites of Kerala, India. Indian J. Tradit. Knowl. 2012, 11, 250–258. [Google Scholar]
  123. Jin, Q.K. Loranthus ferrugineus: A Mistletoe from traditional uses to laboratory bench. J. Pharmacopunct. 2015, 18, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Kienle, G.S.; Kiene, H. Influence of Viscum album L. (European mistletoe) extracts on quality of life in cancer patients: A systematic review of controlled clinical studies. Integr. Cancer Ther. 2010, 9, 142–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Schaller, G.; Urech, K.; Giannattasio, M. Cytotoxicity of different viscotoxins and extracts from the European subspecies of Viscum album L. Phytother. Res. 1996, 10, 473–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Montoya-Inzunza, L.A.; Heredia, J.B.; Patra, J.K.; Gouda, S.; Kerry, R.G.; Das, G.; Gutierrez-Grijalva, E.P. Traditional uses, phytochemical constituents and ethnopharmacological properties of mistletoe from Phoradendron and Viscum species. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen. 2024, 27, 1093–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Nicoletti, M. The anti-inflammatory activity of Viscum album. Plants 2023, 12, 1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Gray, A.M.; Flatt, P.R. Insulin-secreting activity of the traditional antidiabetic plant Viscum album (mistletoe). J. Endocrinol. 1999, 160, 409–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Briskin, D.P. Medicinal plants and phytomedicines. Linking plant biochemistry and physiology to human health. Plant Physiol. 2000, 124, 507–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Horneber, M.; van Ackeren, G.; Linde, K.; Rostock, M. Mistletoe therapy in oncology. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2008, 2008, CD003297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. van Wely, M.; Stoss, M.; Gorter, R.W. Toxicity of a standardized Mistletoe extract in immunocompromised and healthy individuals. Am. J. Ther. 1999, 6, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Huber, R.; Lüdtke, R.; Klassen, M.; Müller-Buscher, G.; Wolff-Vorbeck, G.; Scheer, R. Effects of a Mistletoe preparation with defined lectin content on chronic hepatitis C: An individually controlled cohort study. Eur. J. Med. Res. 2001, 6, 399–405. [Google Scholar]
  133. Huber, R.; Klein, R.; Berg, P.A.; Lüdtke, R.; Werner, M. Effects of a lectin- and a viscotoxins-rich Mistletoe preparation on clinical and hematological parameters: A placebo-controlled evaluation in healthy subjects. J. Altern. Compl. Med. 2002, 8, 857–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Stein, G.M.; Berg, P.A. Characterisation of immunological reactivity of patients with adverse effects during therapy with an aqueous Mistletoe extract. Eur. J. Med. Res. 1999, 4, 169–177. [Google Scholar]
  135. Huber, R.; Eisenbraun, J.; Miletzki, B.; Adler, M.; Scheer, R.; Klein, R.; Gleiter, C.H. Pharmacokinetics of natural Mistletoe lectins after subcutaneous injection. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2010, 66, 889–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Bergmann, L.; Aamdal, S.; Marreaud, S.; Lacombe, D.; Herold, M.; Yamaguchi, T.; Wilhelm-Ogunbiyi, K.; Lentzen, H.; Zwierzina, H. Phase I trial of r viscumin (INN: Aviscumine) given subcutaneously in patients with advanced cancer: A study of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC protocol number 13001). Eur. J. Cancer 2008, 44, 1657–1662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Huber, R.; Rostock, M.; Goedl, R.; Ludtke, R.; Urech, K.; Buck, S.; Klein, R. Mistletoe treatment induces GM-CSF-and IL-5 production by PBMC and increases blood granulocyte-and eosinophil counts: A placebo controlled randomized study in healthy subjects. Eur. J. Med. Res. 2005, 10, 411. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  138. Huber, R.; Lüdtke, H.; Wieber, J.; Beckmann, C. Safety and effects of two Mistletoe preparations on production of Interleukin-6 and other immune parameters-a placebo controlled clinical trial in healthy subjects. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2011, 11, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Maldacker, J. Preclinical investigations with Mistletoe (Viscum album L.) extract Iscador. Arzneimittelforschung 2006, 56, 497–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. European Medicines Agency (EMA). Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Community Code Relating to Medicinal Products for Human Use; European Medicines Agency (EMA): Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  141. Freuding, M.; Keinki, C.; Micke, O.; Buentzel, J.; Huebner, J. Mistletoe in oncological treatment: A systematic review: Part 1: Survival and safety. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2019, 145, 695–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The effect of host tree on mineral element accumulation (%) in V. album [71].
Figure 1. The effect of host tree on mineral element accumulation (%) in V. album [71].
Molecules 30 04390 g001
Figure 2. Phytochemical constituents’ concentrations (%) of the leaf extracts of African mistletoe (T. dodoneifolius (DC) Danser) [84].
Figure 2. Phytochemical constituents’ concentrations (%) of the leaf extracts of African mistletoe (T. dodoneifolius (DC) Danser) [84].
Molecules 30 04390 g002
Figure 3. Screening and quantification (%) of phytochemical constituents of L. micranthus extracts harvested from six (6) different host trees [86].
Figure 3. Screening and quantification (%) of phytochemical constituents of L. micranthus extracts harvested from six (6) different host trees [86].
Molecules 30 04390 g003
Table 1. Mineral elements present in different mistletoe species belonging to Viscaceae and Loranthaceae families.
Table 1. Mineral elements present in different mistletoe species belonging to Viscaceae and Loranthaceae families.
Mistletoe SpeciesElementsReferences
FamilyScientific Name
LoranthaceaeTapinanthus preussii (Engl.) Tiegh.Ca, Fe, K, Na, Mg, Zn, PO43−[55]
LoranthaceaeTupeia antarctica (G.Forst.) Cham. & Schltdl.Ca, Mg, K, Na, P, N[56]
ViscaceaeViscum album L.Ca, Mg, K, P[57]
ViscaceaeViscum album L. subsp. albumCa, Mg, Fe, Mn, N, P, K, Na, S, Cu, Zn, B[58]
Ca, N, P, K, Na, S, Mg, Fe, Cu, Zn, Mn, Mo, B[59]
LoranthaceaeIleostylus micranthus (Hook.f.) Tiegh.Ca, Mg, K, Na, P, N[60]
LoranthaceaeLoranthus micranthus Hook.f.Ca, Mg, P, Zn[17]
LoranthaceaeTapinanthus bangwensis (Engl. & K.Krause) DanserCa, Mg, Mn, P, Zn, K, I, Fe, Na[18]
LoranthaceaePhragmanthera incana (Schumach.) BalleCa, Mg, K, Na[54]
ViscaceaeViscum album subsp. austriacum (Wiesb.) Vollm.Ca, Mg, P, K, Mn, Cu, Zn, Fe, Se, S, Cl[16]
ViscaceaeViscum articulatum Burm. f.Ca, Mg, Mn, Cu, K, P, Fe, Zn, N[13]
Table 2. Components present in various mistletoe species.
Table 2. Components present in various mistletoe species.
Family NameBotanical NameNutritional Constituents and Est. Value (g/100 g Dry Weight)References
LoranthaceaeLoranthus micranthus
Hook.f.
Moisture (18), crude fiber (10.5), crude protein (11.2),
nitrogen-free extract (69.5), fat (3.8) and ash content (4.5)
[17]
LoranthaceaeTapinanthus bangwen-
sis (Engl. & K. Krause)
Danser
Crude fat (4.2), protein (12.5), total carbohydrates (68.4),
crude fiber (9.8), moisture content (7.5) and ash (5.1)
[18]
Moisture (8.2), ash (4.8), crude protein (14.1), ether extract
(3.5), crude fiber (11.2) and nitrogen-free extract (NFE) (66.4)
[61]
LoranthaceaeTapinanthus preussii
(Engl.) Tiegh.
Moisture (7.8), ether extract (fat) (4.5), ash (5.5), protein (13.8),
crude fiber (10.8) and carbohydrates (65.4)
[52]
ViscaceaeViscum album var.
coloratum
Carbohydrates (58.4), crude protein (16.8), crude fiber (14.2),
crude ash (5.8) and crude fat (4.8)
[62]
ViscaceaeZiscum verrucosum
(Harv.)
Dry matter 927.3, organic matter 821.6, crude protein (123.4),
neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber and acid detergent
lignin
[63]
LoranthaceaePhragmanthera incana
(Schumach.) Balle
Fat (5.1), moisture (6.9), crude fiber (12.4), crude protein
(15.3), ash (6.2) and carbohydrates (61.0)
[64]
ViscaceaeViscum album L.Crude protein (12.33), crude oil (5.49), crude ash (7.39), neutral detergent fiber (31.37), and acid detergent fiber (25.73)[65]
Table 3. Mineral element screening and level of abundance in mistletoe species (V. album) harvested from four different host trees [58].
Table 3. Mineral element screening and level of abundance in mistletoe species (V. album) harvested from four different host trees [58].
ElementsHost Tree Species
P. albaS. albaR. pseudoacaciaC. monogyna
N+↓+↓++↑+↓
Ca++↑+↓+↓+↓
P+↓++↑+↓+↓
K+↓++↑+↓+↓
Na++↑+↓+↓+↓
Mg+↓++↑+↓+↓
Mn+↓++↑+↓+↓
Fe+↓+↓+↓++↑
Zn++↑+↓+↓+↓
Cu+↓++↑+↓+↓
S+↓++↑+↓+↓
Mo++↑ +↓+↓
B+↓++↑+↓+↓
++↑ indicates the abundant presence of nutrients higher in the host tree than in mistletoe; +↓ indicates the presence of lower nutrients in the host tree than in the mistletoe.
Table 5. Polyphenols detected in different mistletoe species.
Table 5. Polyphenols detected in different mistletoe species.
Family NameScientific NamePhenolic AcidsFlavonoidsReferences
ViscaceaeViscum album L. ssp
album
Gallic acid (12.5 mg/g), caffeic acid (3.2 mg/g), ferulic acid (1.1 mg/g), p-Coumaric acid (0.8 mg/g), salicylic acid, gentisic acid, grotocatechuic acid, p-hydrobenzoic, rosmarinic acid, and sinapic acid (other acids detected in trace amounts)3-O-Methyl quercetin (8.7 mg/g), apigenin (2.1 mg/g), and naringenin (0.5 mg/g)[94]
ViscaceaeViscum album L. ssp
abietis
p-Coumaric acid (9.8 mg/g), ferulic acid (4.5 mg/g), caffeic acid (2.1 mg/g), salicylic acid, protocatechuic acid, 4-hydrobenzoic acid, vanilic acid, and sinapic acid (other acids detected in trace amounts)Rhamnetin (5.5 mg/g), 3-O-Methyl quercetin (3.2 mg/g), naringenin (1.1 mg/g), rhamnazin, and apigenin (other acids detected in trace amounts)[95]
ViscaceaeViscum album L. ssp
austriacum
Sinapic acid (15.2 mg/g), ferulic acid (6.7 mg/g), caffeic acid (3.4 mg/g), protocatechuic acid, salicylic acid, 4-hydroxybenzoic acid, vanilic acid, and p-Coumaric acid (other acids detected in trace amounts)Quercetin (10.1 mg/g), myricetin (9.5 mg/g), kaempferol (4.3 mg/g), naringenin, eriodictyol, sakuranetin, isorhamnetin, rhamnazin, and rhamnetin (other acids detected in trace amounts)[96]
ViscaceaeViscum album L. ssp
coloratum
Not detected (ND)Eriodictyol (0.8 mg/g)[97]
Table 6. Ethnomedicinal values/importance of various mistletoe species.
Table 6. Ethnomedicinal values/importance of various mistletoe species.
Mistletoe SpeciesMedicinal Values and ApplicationReferences
Family NameScientific Name
LoranthaceaeLoranthus bengwensis L. To treat Diabetes mellitus [98]
LoranthaceaeTapinanthus dodoneifolius (DC.) DanserAntimicrobial activities against certain multiple drug-resistant bacteria and fungal isolates[81]
ViscaceaeViscum album L. var
album
Diabetes, high blood pressure and insomnia[54]
ViscaceaeViscum album L.To treat skin diseases and prostate cancer, anticancer, antihypertensive activity and antidiabetic properties[120]
LoranthaceaeTapinanthus bangwensis (Engl. & K.Krause) Danser Antihypertensive and antidiabetic agents[121]
Hypotensive, hypoglycemic and hypolipidemic effect, which lowers blood pressure, blood glucose and lipid profile[14]
ViscaceaeViscum articulatum Burm. f.Paste and decoction are given to cure cuts, wounds, bone fractures, ulcers and blood diseases, epilepsy and sprains[122]
LoranthaceaeLoranthus ferrugineus Roxb. ex. JackHypertension and gastrointestinal complaint management[123]
ViscaceaeViscum album L. var.
coloratum Ohwi
Material for anticancer functional foods for treatment of tumorigenic cells[109]
Table 8. Applications of different dosages of different mistletoe preparations in clinical trials.
Table 8. Applications of different dosages of different mistletoe preparations in clinical trials.
PreparationExtractHost TreeApplicationDosage (mg Extract
or ng ML)
Standardization
Phytotherapeutic preparations
Eurixor®Aqueous (herb)PoplarSubcutaneous, intracutaneous, intravenous1 mg or 70 ng/ampule
(1 mL)
ML-I
Lektinol®Aqueous (herb)PoplarSubcutaneous0.02–0.07 mg or 15 ng/ampule n(0.5 mL)ML-I
Anthroposophic preparations
Helixor®Aqueous (herb)Apple, fir and pine treeSubcutaneous 0.01–50 mg/amp. (1 mL),
100 mg (2 mL)
Process
Iscador®Aqueous lacto-fermented (herb)Elm and oak treeSubcutaneous0.0001–20 mg/ampule
(1 mL)
Process
Isorel®aqueous (planta tota)M, P, ASubcutaneous, intramuscular 1–60 mgProcess
Note: M, P, A stand for Maple, Pine, Apple, respectively.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mopai, M.G.; Mpai, S.; Van Staden, J.; Ndhlala, A.R. Phytonutrient Profiles of Mistletoe and Their Values and Potential Applications in Ethnopharmacology and Nutraceuticals: A Review. Molecules 2025, 30, 4390. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30224390

AMA Style

Mopai MG, Mpai S, Van Staden J, Ndhlala AR. Phytonutrient Profiles of Mistletoe and Their Values and Potential Applications in Ethnopharmacology and Nutraceuticals: A Review. Molecules. 2025; 30(22):4390. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30224390

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mopai, Maeleletse G., Semakaleng Mpai, Johannes Van Staden, and Ashwell R. Ndhlala. 2025. "Phytonutrient Profiles of Mistletoe and Their Values and Potential Applications in Ethnopharmacology and Nutraceuticals: A Review" Molecules 30, no. 22: 4390. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30224390

APA Style

Mopai, M. G., Mpai, S., Van Staden, J., & Ndhlala, A. R. (2025). Phytonutrient Profiles of Mistletoe and Their Values and Potential Applications in Ethnopharmacology and Nutraceuticals: A Review. Molecules, 30(22), 4390. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30224390

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop