Next Article in Journal
The Quest for Green Solvents for the Sustainable Production of Nanosheets of Two-Dimensional (2D) Materials, a Key Issue in the Roadmap for the Ecology Transition in the Flatland
Previous Article in Journal
Characterization and Comparison of Extra Virgin Olive Oils of Turkish Olive Cultivars
Previous Article in Special Issue
Review and Chemoinformatic Analysis of Ferroptosis Modulators with a Focus on Natural Plant Products
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Redox Active Molecules in Cancer Treatments

by
Višnja Stepanić
1,* and
Marta Kučerová-Chlupáčová
2,*
1
Laboratory for Machine Learning and Knowledge Representation, Ruđer Bošković Institute, Bijenička 54, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
2
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Analysis, Faculty of Pharmacy in Hradec Králové, Charles University, Ak. Heyrovského 1203/8, 500 05 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(3), 1485; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28031485
Submission received: 29 January 2023 / Accepted: 31 January 2023 / Published: 3 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Redox Active Molecules in Cancer Treatments)
Cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide, with nearly 10 million deaths in 2020 [1]. Redox active molecules in the diet, dietary supplements, or in approved drug preparations are used to prevent and treat cancer.
The main objective of this Special Issue, “Redox Active Molecules in Cancer Treatments”, in the journal Molecules is to present the results of in vitro, in vivo, and/or in silico studies on the biological effects and activities of anti- and pro-oxidant molecules observed in original research studies or collected and discussed in review articles. This goal is achieved by compiling seventeen articles. They present antioxidative or targeted oxidative effects of miscellaneous small-molecular-weight compounds or proteins against a variety of cancer types:
  • An endogenous compound—melatonin [2].
  • Natural plant compounds (naringenin [3], papaverine [4], polyphenols isolated from Myrciaria trunciflora [5] or Anneslea fragrans [6], and seed-derived peptides [7]), natural compounds also found in animals (melatonin [2,8]), and peptides as well as proteins from Jellyfish venom [9].
  • Synthetic compounds, i.e., alkyl thiols [10], dimethyl sulfoxide [11], metformin and S63845 [12], the ruthenium complex [Ru(Phen)3]2+ [13], and copper-based compounds—Casiopeinas [14].
  • Different formulations, i.e., peptide fractions from germinated soybeans conjugated to Fe3O4 nanoparticles [15] and astaxanthin microparticles in combination with pentoxifylline [16].
  • Proteins (aquaporins [17]) and nuclear factor erythroid-2-related factor 2 (NRF2) [8].
The studies explored diverse anticancer mechanisms of action of redox-active molecules in association with specific signaling pathways by using in vitro and in vivo methods. Some studies investigated the use of redox-active compounds to alleviate radiation-induced fibrosis, which is a side-effect of radiotherapy [16], or to detect oxygen in vitro and in vivo [13]. Most studies examined the effect of the tested compounds on cancer cell viability/proliferation assays [2,3,4,6,11,12] and/or analyses of reactive oxygen species concentrations [2,3,6,11,15,16]. Some other studies used in vitro assays such as cell cycle analyses [2,3,4,9], DNA fragmentation assays [3,9], analyses of the expression of apoptosis-related proteins and/or genes [9,11,12], etc. The two included studies are based on the application of state-of-the-art chemoinformatic analysis and modeling approaches—molecular docking and molecular dynamics [7,18].
The whole series of thirteen experimental investigations and one computational study is accompanied by three review articles focusing on aquaporins as redox regulators in breast cancer [17], natural compounds affecting ferroptosis [18], and modulation of NRF2 expression at the mRNA and protein levels [8].
We hope that readers will enjoy the book and glean interesting and useful information from the particular studies.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all of the authors who contributed to this Special Issue.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. World-Health-Organization. Cancer. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cancer (accessed on 11 January 2023).
  2. Chok, K.C.; Koh, R.Y.; Ng, M.G.; Ng, P.Y.; Chye, S.M. Melatonin Induces Autophagy via Reactive Oxygen Species-Mediated Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Pathway in Colorectal Cancer Cells. Molecules 2021, 26, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lee, C.W.; Huang, C.C.Y.; Chi, M.C.; Lee, K.H.; Peng, K.T.; Fang, M.L.; Chiang, Y.C.; Liu, J.F. Naringenin Induces ROS-Mediated ER Stress, Autophagy, and Apoptosis in Human Osteosarcoma Cell Lines. Molecules 2022, 27, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gomes, D.A.; Joubert, A.M.; Visagie, M.H. In Vitro Effects of Papaverine on Cell Proliferation, Reactive Oxygen Species, and Cell Cycle Progression in Cancer Cells. Molecules 2021, 26, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Augusti, P.R.; Quatrin, A.; Mello, R.; Bochi, V.C.; Rodrigues, E.; Prazeres, I.D.; Macedo, A.C.; Oliveira-Alves, S.C.; Emanuelli, T.; Bronze, M.R.; et al. Antiproliferative Effect of Colonic Fermented Phenolic Compounds from Jaboticaba (Myrciaria trunciflora) Fruit Peel in a 3D Cell Model of Colorectal Cancer. Molecules 2021, 26, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. He, S.Y.; Cui, X.Y.; Khan, A.; Liu, Y.P.; Wang, Y.D.; Cui, Q.M.; Zhao, T.R.; Cao, J.X.; Cheng, G.G. Activity Guided Isolation of Phenolic Compositions from Anneslea fragrans Wall. and Their Cytoprotective Effect against Hydrogen Peroxide Induced Oxidative Stress in HepG2 Cells. Molecules 2021, 26, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Chai, T.T.; Koh, J.A.; Wong, C.C.C.; Sabri, M.Z.; Wong, F.C. Computational Screening for the Anticancer Potential of Seed-Derived Antioxidant Peptides: A Cheminformatic Approach. Molecules 2021, 26, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Aliyev, A.T.; Panieri, E.; Stepanić, V.; Gurer-Orhan, H.; Saso, L. Involvement of NRF2 in Breast Cancer and Possible Therapeutical Role of Polyphenols and Melatonin. Molecules 2021, 26, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tawfik, M.M.; Eissa, N.; Althobaiti, F.; Fayad, E.; Abu Almaaty, A.H. Nomad Jellyfish Rhopilema nomadica Venom Induces Apoptotic Cell Death and Cell Cycle Arrest in Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma HepG2 Cells. Molecules 2021, 26, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Heymans, V.; Kunath, S.; Hajieva, P.; Moosmann, B. Cell Culture Characterization of Prooxidative Chain-Transfer Agents as Novel Cytostatic Drugs. Molecules 2021, 26, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Sangweni, N.F.; Dludla, P.V.; Chellan, N.; Mabasa, L.; Sharma, J.R.; Johnson, R. The Implication of Low Dose Dimethyl Sulfoxide on Mitochondrial Function and Oxidative Damage in Cultured Cardiac and Cancer Cells. Molecules 2021, 26, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Valiuliene, G.; Vitkeviciene, A.; Skliute, G.; Borutinskaite, V.; Navakauskiene, R. Pharmaceutical Drug Metformin and MCL1 Inhibitor S63845 Exhibit Anticancer Activity in Myeloid Leukemia Cells via Redox Remodeling. Molecules 2021, 26, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Huntosova, V.; Horvath, D.; Seliga, R.; Wagnieres, G. Influence of Oxidative Stress on Time-Resolved Oxygen Detection by Ru(Phen)(3) (2+) In Vivo and In Vitro. Molecules 2021, 26, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ramirez-Palma, L.G.; Espinoza-Guillen, A.; Nieto-Camacho, F.; Lopez-Guerra, A.E.; Gomez-Vidales, V.; Cortes-Guzman, F.; Ruiz-Azuara, L. Intermediate Detection in the Casiopeina-Cysteine Interaction Ending in the Disulfide Bond Formation and Copper Reduction. Molecules 2021, 26, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Augusto-Jimenez, Y.E.; Gonzalez-Montoya, M.; Naranjo-Feliciano, D.; Uribe-Ramirez, D.; Cristiani-Urbina, E.; Diaz-Aguila, C.; Yee-Madeira, H.; Mora-Escobedo, R. Antioxidant Activity of Bioactive Peptide Fractions from Germinated Soybeans Conjugated to Fe3O4 Nanoparticles by the Ugi Multicomponent Reaction. Molecules 2021, 26, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Binatti, E.; Zoccatelli, G.; Zanoni, F.; Dona, G.; Mainente, F.; Chignola, R. Effects of Combination Treatments with Astaxanthin-Loaded Microparticles and Pentoxifylline on Intracellular ROS and Radiosensitivity of J774A.1 Macrophages. Molecules 2021, 26, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Milković, L.; Čipak Gašparović, A. AQP3 and AQP5-Potential Regulators of Redox Status in Breast Cancer. Molecules 2021, 26, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Stepanić, V.; Kučerová-Chlupáčová, M. Review and Chemoinformatic Analysis of Ferroptosis Modulators with a Focus on Natural Plant Products. Molecules 2023, 28, 475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Stepanić, V.; Kučerová-Chlupáčová, M. Redox Active Molecules in Cancer Treatments. Molecules 2023, 28, 1485. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28031485

AMA Style

Stepanić V, Kučerová-Chlupáčová M. Redox Active Molecules in Cancer Treatments. Molecules. 2023; 28(3):1485. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28031485

Chicago/Turabian Style

Stepanić, Višnja, and Marta Kučerová-Chlupáčová. 2023. "Redox Active Molecules in Cancer Treatments" Molecules 28, no. 3: 1485. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28031485

APA Style

Stepanić, V., & Kučerová-Chlupáčová, M. (2023). Redox Active Molecules in Cancer Treatments. Molecules, 28(3), 1485. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28031485

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop