Review Reports

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

I think the research is properly planned and conducted in scientific proceedings. 

Especially valuable is the optimization of fermentation values, also bioreactor research is needed in further research.

I have found some editorial mistakes to be improved

Line 10 naringen. (full stop)

Line 57-59 FDA repetition of the case

line 491 Czapek not Czapka

Line 314 data in Table 6 (there is no this table).

Both in numbering tabes as well as figures the renumbering should be done.

 

Author Response

Thank you very much for your comments on our manuscript. They have been included in the revised version of the study. They certainly allowed us to improve our article.

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors,

in general, the present manuscript reports interesting results about developing a method of naringinase biosynthesis by Aspergillus niger KMS on an optimized culture medium. The paper is of interest to readers and the study contains some interesting data. The experimental design is well conducted. In my opinion, the revised manuscript can be accepted after minor revision. See the file attached.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thank you very much for the review of our manuscript. We appreciate your effort to improve this manuscript and are grateful for your insightful comments. Appropriated changes suggested by the Reviewer have been introduced to the manuscript.