Next Article in Journal
Antimicrobial Activity and Synergy Investigation of Hypericum scabrum Essential Oil with Antifungal Drugs
Next Article in Special Issue
Assessment of Agroeconomic Indicators of Sesamum indicum L. as Influenced by Application of Boron at Different Levels and Plant Growth Stages
Previous Article in Journal
Diterpenoid Compounds Isolated from Chloranthus oldhamii Solms Exert Anti-Inflammatory Effects by Inhibiting the IKK/NF-κB Pathway
Previous Article in Special Issue
Recent Advances in Crystalline Oxidopolyborate Complexes of d-Block or p-Block Metals: Structural Aspects, Syntheses, and Physical Properties
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 26
Issue 21
10.3390/molecules26216544
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis of Boronated Amidines by Addition of Amines to Nitrilium Derivative of Cobalt Bis(Dicarbollide) †

by
Ekaterina V. Bogdanova
1,2,
Marina Yu. Stogniy
1,2,*,
Kyrill Yu. Suponitsky
1,3,
Igor B. Sivaev
1 and
Vladimir I. Bregadze
1
1
A.N. Nesmeyanov Institute of Organoelement Compounds, Russian Academy of Sciences, 28 Vavilov Street, 119991 Moscow, Russia
2
M.V. Lomonosov Institute of Fine Chemical Technology, MIREA—Russian Technological University, 86 Vernadsky Av., 119571 Moscow, Russia
3
Basic Department of Chemistry of Innovative Materials and Technologies, G.V. Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, 36 Stremyannyi Line, 117997 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
In memory of Professor Fred Hawthorne (1928–2021), one of father of modern boron chemistry.
Molecules 2021, 26(21), 6544; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26216544
Submission received: 9 October 2021 / Revised: 26 October 2021 / Accepted: 28 October 2021 / Published: 29 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Frontiers of Boron Chemistry in 21th Century: From Fundamental Science to Applications - In Memory of Professor M. Frederick Hawthorne)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A series of novel cobalt bis(dicarbollide) based amidines were synthesized by the nucleophilic addition of primary and secondary amines to highly activated B-N+≡C–R triple bond of the propionitrilium derivative [8-EtC≡N-3,3′-Co(1,2-C2B9H10)(1′,2′-C2B9H11)]. The reactions with primary amines result in the formation of mixtures of E and Z isomers of amidines, whereas the reactions with secondary amines lead selectively to the E-isomers. The crystal molecular structures of E-[8-EtC(NMe2)=HN-3,3′-Co(1,2-C2B9H10)(1′,2′-C2B9H11)], E-[8-EtC(NEt2)=HN-3,3′-Co(1,2- C2B9H10)(1′,2′-C2B9H11)] and E-[8-EtC(NC5H10)=HN-3,3′-Co(1,2-C2B9H10)(1′,2′-C2B9H11)] were determined by single crystal X-ray diffraction.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Cobalt bis(dicarbollide) [3,3′-Co(1,2-C2B9H11)2]− is the most available and the most stable of metallacarboranes [1,2,3,4], which attracts considerable attention of researchers due to possibility of its use in a variety of fields, from the development of new materials [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12] to medicine [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. Therefore, the development of new convenient methods for the functionalization of cobalt bis(dicarbollide) cobalt is an important task [3,4]. One of the convenient methods for the functionalization of the cobalt bis(dicarbollide) anion is the ring opening of its cyclic oxonium derivatives with various nucleophiles [29]. Another promising method is the addition of nucleophiles to the nitrilium derivatives of cobalt bis(dicarbollide). Nucleophilic addition reactions to the highly polarized –N+≡CR triple bonds in aryl- and alkylnitrilium salts [30] and nitrile complexes of transition metals [31,32,33,34,35] are widely used in organic synthesis and have large potential in the modification of polyhedral boron hydrides [36]. Thus, the nitrilium derivatives of the closo-decaborate anion react with water [37,38], alcohols [39], amines [40,41], hydrazines [42], hydrazones [42] and oximes [43,44], as well as with various carbanions [45,46] to form the corresponding addition products. Like organic nitrilium salts, they are able to participate in 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reactions with azides and nitrones leading to the corresponding boronated tetrazoles [47] and 2,3-dihydro-1,2,4-oxadiazoles [48], respectively. Several examples of nucleophile addition reactions to the activated triple bond of the nitrilium derivatives of cobalt bis(dicarbollide) [8-RC≡N-3,3′-Co(1,2-C2B9H10)(1′,2′-C2B9H11)2] (R = Me, Ph) were also reported [49,50].
Recently, we initiated a systematic study of nucleophilic addition reactions to the activated triple bond of nitrilium derivatives of cobalt bis(dicarbollide) and described the synthesis of a series of imidates and thioimidates based thereof [51]. In this contribution, we report on the synthesis of boronated amidines by nucleophilic addition of primary and secondary amines to the propionitrilium derivative of cobalt bis(dicarbollide).

2. Results and Discussion

Amidines, that are the nitrogen analogues of carboxylic acids and esters, are well known and studied class of organic compounds [52,53,54,55,56]. Amidine derivatives are commonly used for the synthesis of many important heterocycles such as imidazoles, triazoles, thiazoles, oxadiazoles, pyrimidines, pyridines and triazines. The amidine moiety is a key pharmacophore in many biologically active compounds [57,58,59,60,61,62,63]. 1,8-Diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (DBU) and some other amidines are used as organocatalysts in organic synthesis [64,65,66,67,68].
The direct addition of amines to nitriles is a straightforward and atom-economical approach to the synthesis of amidines. However, this approach is complicated by the need to activate organic nitriles by introducing electron-withdrawing substituents or by using harsh reaction conditions [52,53,54]. The use of various Lewis acids (AlCl3, ZnCl2, CaCl2, SmI2, TiCl4 or SnCl4) or organoaluminum compounds facilitates the addition of amines to organic nitriles to form amidines, but requires their stoichiometric equivalents along with nitrile and amine substrates. Of particular interest are the reactions of nitriles with amines in the presence of transition metal complexes, which can be used both in a stoichiometric ratio to study the reactions of coordinated nitriles [31,32], and in catalytic amounts in organic synthesis [69,70,71]. Synthesis of boronated amidines by the reaction of nucleophilic addition of amines to alkylnitrilium derivatives was first described for arachno-decaborate [72] and closo-decaborate [40,41,73,74,75,76] anions. Later, amidines on the base of nido-carborane [77,78,79] and the closo-dodecaborate anion [80] were synthesized. The reactions of [(8-RC≡N-3,3′-Co(1,2-C2B9H10)(1′,2′-C2B9H11] (R = Me, Ph) with n-butylamine and diethylamine resulting in the corresponding amidines were reported as well [49]. This prompted us to study in more detail the reactions of nitrilium derivatives of cobalt bis(dicarbollide) with various primary and secondary amines. The propionitrilium derivative of cobalt bis(dicarbollide) [51] was chosen for this study due to clear identification of ethyl group in NMR spectra and, first of all, in 1H NMR.

2.1. Nucleophilic Addition of Primary Amines

The nucleophilic addition reactions of primary amines (methylamine, ethylamine, propylamine, but also 3-amino-1-propanol, 2-methoxyethylamine, ethylenediamine and N,N-dimethylethylenediamine) to highly activated triple bond B-N+≡C-R of [8-EtC≡N-3,3′-Co(1,2-C2B9H10)(1′,2′-C2B9H11)] were studied. The reactions were carried out in acetonitrile solution in air at room temperature. The nucleophilic addition of amines occurs very fast and is completed in 5–10 min. In all cases, except for the reaction with ethylenediamine, the corresponding cobalt bis(dicarbollide) amidines 1–6 were obtained (Scheme 1). Purification of the products (if required) was carried out by column chromatography on silica.
Although 2-aminoethanol NH2CH2CH2OH, as ambidentate nucleophile, can be added to nitriles via nitrogen or oxygen atoms, it was reasonable to assume that the addition will occur through the more nucleophilic N-center. Indeed, we found that the reaction of [8-EtC≡N-3,3′-Co(1,2-C2B9H10)(1′,2′-C2B9H11)] with 2-aminoethanol leads exclusively to amidine 5, rather than the corresponding amidate. It should be noted that the addition reactions of amino alcohols to the coordinated propionitrile in the platinum(IV) complex trans-[PtCl4(EtCN)2] proceed in a similar way [81].
In the case of ethylenediamine, the reaction with the propionitrilium derivative of cobalt bis(dicarbollide) lead to the destruction of the metallacarborane complex with the formation of a mixture of nido-carborane containing products. It should be noted that the reaction of the propionitrilium derivative of nido-carborane 10-EtC≡N-7,8-C2B9H11 with ethylenediamine led to the formation of ammonium derivative of nido-carborane 10-H3N-7,8-C2B9H11 instead of the expected amidine [77].
Amidines 1–6 were obtained as mixtures of E and Z isomers in nearly quantitative yields. The formation of E and Z isomers was earlier observed for cobalt bis(dicarbollide) based imidates and thioimidates [51]. For the imidates with short alkoxy substituent such as methoxy and ethoxy, it was possible to separate isomers by column chromatography on silica. However, in the case of the isopropoxy and butoxy substituents, as well as for the thioimidates, fast mutual isomerization of individual isomers in solution was observed.
In the case of amidines, the formation of mixtures of E and Z isomers of 1–6 was detected using thin-layer chromatography, but all attempts to separate them by column chromatography on silica were failed. This can be explained by fast isomerization of pure isomers in solution with the formation of equilibrium mixtures of E and Z isomers, which is typical for organic amidines [82]. In all mixtures of isomers we observed an excess of Z isomers over E isomers with the E:Z ratio varying from 1:1.2 to 1:2.3 depending on the amine used (the measurements were performed by comparing the integrated intensities of signals of the same groups for different isomers in the 1H NMR spectra). A noticeable difference in the chemical shifts of the signals of the same groups for the E and Z isomers in the 1H and 13C NMR spectra made is possible to assign them to individual isomers using the (HH)gCOSY and (HC)HSQC NMR methods (Figure 1) as well as the spectral data of the amidines 7–10 obtained by the reactions with secondary amines (See below).
The 1H NMR spectra of E and Z isomers of amidines 1–6 are significantly different. The most sensitive to the isomer geometry are signals of atoms at the double bond. First of all, these are the signals of NH protons. In most of cases for the E-isomers the signal of the NHR hydrogen is in a lower field than the signal of the NH=C hydrogen, whereas for Z-isomers the position of these signals is opposite. The characteristic quartet form the CH2 group of the ethyl substituent in the 1H NMR spectra of the E-isomers is observed at 2.84–2.89 ppm, whereas for the Z-isomers this signal is high-field shifted and appears at 2.68–2.70 ppm. The signal from the NH–CH2– group generally appear in some higher field for the E isomers than for the Z-isomer (for example the signal of NH-CH3 appears at 3.06 ppm for 1a and at 3.19 ppm for 1b).
The 13C NMR spectra of amidines 1–6 are much less sensitive to the isomer geometry and in many cases the signals of the same groups for different isomers coincide with each other, for example, the signals of the NH=C group, which appear in low field at ~167–169 ppm. Another example is the signals of the CH2 group of the ethyl substituent that are observed in higher field for the E-isomers (at ~24 ppm) in comparing with those for the Z-isomers (~25 ppm).
In the 11B NMR spectra the most sensitive are the signals of the substituted boron atom. They appear at ~−12.5 for the E-isomers and at ~−10.5 ppm for the Z-isomers. The IR spectra of amidines 1–6 contain the characteristic absorption bands of the NH and N=C stretching as 3290–3380 and 1630–1640 cm−1, respectively.
Although the formation of mixtures of the E and Z isomers for organic amidines is well known [82], the presence of E- and Z-isomers in solutions of boronated amidines prepared by addition of primary amines to nitrilium derivatives of polyhedral boron hydrides was reported only for the nido-decaborane [72] and nido-carborane [77,79] based amidines. This could be an indication that for the other boronated amidines only one isomer is present in solution, or that the interconversion between the E-and Z-isomers is fast on the NMR time scale. However, in the solid state all these amidines have Z-configuration [40,49,75,76]. On the other hand, earlier, when studying the addition of primary amines to the coordinated nitrile ligands in platinum(II) complexes cis- and trans-[PtCl2(NCR)2], it was found that the reactions with the acetonitrile complexes (R = Me) produce exclusively the Z-amidines [83], while the reactions with the benzonitrile complexes (R = Ph) result in mixtures of the E and Z isomers [84]. Again, in a solid state the amidine ligands in these complexes have Z-configuration. Thus, the equilibrium between the E and Z isomers of amidines in solution largely depends on the substituents in the amidine fragment.

2.2. Nucleophilic Addition of Secondary Amines

In contrast to the primary amines, the nucleophilic addition of secondary amines (dimethylamine, diethylamine, piperidine and morpholine) to the activated triple bond of [8-EtC≡N-3,3′-Co(1,2-C2B9H10)(1′,2′-C2B9H11)] results in the formation of exclusively E isomers of amidines 7–10 (Scheme 2). The formation of only E isomers was previously observed for the nucleophilic addition of secondary amines to the propionitrilium derivative of nido-carborane, whereas the reactions with primary amines resulted in mixtures of E and Z isomers [56].
The assignment of the E isomers of amidines 7–10 was performed using the (HH)NOESY NMR method. The presence cross-peaks between the signals of the NH and OCH2 hydrogens clearly indicates the formation of the E isomers (Figure 2).
The NMR spectral data of the E isomers of amidines 7–10 allowed us to verify the assignment of spectral signals made for the mixtures of E and Z isomers of amidines 1–6. Thus, in the 11B NMR spectra of amidines 7–10 the singlet from substituted boron atom appears at ~13.0 ppm that corresponds to the chemical shift of this signal in the E isomers of compounds 1–6. The comparison of other spectral data is also in good agreement. In the 1H NMR spectrum of amidine 7 the signals of two non-equivalent methyl groups of the dimethylamino fragment N(CH3)2 are observed as two singlets at 3.38 and 3.26 ppm, whereas for amidine 8 the signals of the diethylamino N(CH2CH3)2 fragment appear as a multiplet at 3.66 ppm and two triplets at 1.29 and 1.27 ppm. Similarly, in the 13C NMR spectrum of 7 there are two signals from the N(CH3)2 fragment at 39.9 and 37.8 ppm, whereas the signals from the N(CH2CH3)2 fragment of 8 are represented by two peaks in lower field at 45.0 and 41.9 ppm and two peaks in high field at 13.1 and 11.1 ppm. Such non-equivalence of alkyl groups at the nitrogen atom is due to restricted rotation around the C=N bond in the amidine fragment.

2.3. X-ray Diffraction Study

Crystals of amidines 7–9, suitable for X-ray diffraction studies, were grown by slow evaporation of solutions in acetone-hexane or acetonitrile-hexane. The amidine fragments in all compounds have the E configuration with a nearly planar structure (Figure 3). The lengths of the B(8)–N(1), N(1)–C(3), C(3)–N(2) and C(3)–C(4) bonds are 1.518–1.522, 1.312–1.319, 1.327–1.330 and 1.491–1.498 Å, respectively, which are close to the values found earlier in [8-MeC(NEt2)=HN-3,3′-Co(1,2-C2B9H10)(1′,2′-C2B9H11)] [49]. The E-configuration was found also in amidines prepared by addition of secondary amines to nitrilium derivatives of other polyhedral boron hydrides ((Bu4N)[2- B10H9NH=C(N(CH2CH2)2O)Me] [41], (Bu4N)[2-B10H9NH=C(N(CH2)5)Me] [41], [2- B10H9NH=C(N(Me)(CH2)3NHMe2)Me] [73] and [6,9-B10H12(NH=C(NBu2)Me)2] [72]), as well as in the related amidine complexes of transition metals (cis- [PtCl2(N≡CPh)(NH=C(N(tBu)CH2CH2NHtBu))] [85], cis-[PtCl2(NH=(NMe2)Me)2] [86], trans-[PtCl2(NCMe)(NH=C(NMeBut)Me)] [83], cis-[PtCl2(NH=C(NEt2)Me)2] [87], [Pd(NH=C(NEt2)Me)4][BF4]2 [87], [Cp*Ir(η3-CH2CHCHPh)(NH=C(NMe2)Me)](OTf) [88] and [(Quin)2Zn(NH=C(NC4H8)Me)] [89]).
The dicarbollide ligands in all structures are slightly (by 38.5–41.7°) rotated relative to each other, adopting the cisoid conformation. The substituents in compounds 7 and 8 are rotated in such a way that they form short NH···HB contacts of ~ 2.23–2.24 Å length with the B(8′)H group of the opposite unsubstituted dicarbollide ligand, whereas in the structure of 9 the short NH···HB contact of 1.76 Å is formed with the B(4′)H group of the opposite dicarbollide ligand. These distances are less than the sum of the van der Waals radii of two hydrogen atoms (2.4 Å), which is indicative of the weak N–Hδ+···Hδ-–B dihydrogen bonding that is commonly observed in compounds containing boron and nitrogen atoms [90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101]. It was shown that in the case of the imidate derivative of cobalt bis(dicarbollide) [8-EtC(OiPr)=HN-3,3′-Co(1,2-C2B9H10)(1′,2′-C2B9H11)], the presence of even weaker NH···HB contact (2.31 Å) leads to additional stabilization of the cisoid conformation by ~2 kcal mol−1 [51]. Therefore, for the amidines, a more significant stabilization of the cisoid conformation can be expected, especially in the case of compound 9.

3. Conclusions

In this work, the nucleophilic addition reactions of primary and secondary amines to highly activated B–N+≡C–R triple bond of the propionitrilium derivative of cobalt bis(dicarbollide) anion [8-EtC≡N-3,3′-Co(1,2-C2B9H10)(1′,2′-C2B9H11)] were studied. As a result, a series of new metallacarborane-based amidines was synthesized. It was found out that the reactions with primary amines result in the formation of mixtures of the E- and Z-isomers, whereas the reactions with secondary amines leads selectively to the E- isomers. The crystal molecular structures of E-[8-EtC(NMe2)=HN-3,3′-Co(1,2- C2B9H10)(1′,2′-C2B9H11)], E-[8-EtC(NEt2)=HN-3,3′-Co(1,2-C2B9H10)(1′,2′-C2B9H11)] and E-[8- EtC(NC5H10)=HN-3,3′-Co(1,2-C2B9H10)(1′,2′-C2B9H11)] were determined by single crystal X-ray diffraction.

4. Experimental

4.1. Materials and Methods

The propionitrilium derivative of cobalt bis(dicarbollide) was prepared according to the literature procedure [51]. Methylamine, ethylamine and dimethylamine were generated from their concentrated aqueous solutions by the addition of K2CO3 at –5 °C. Propylamine, diethylamine, ethylenediamine, N,N-dimethylethylenediamine, 2-methoxyethylamine and 3-amino-1-propanol were purchased from Acros Organics and used without purification. Piperidine and morpholine were commercially analytical grade reagents and used without further treatment. Acetonitrile was dried using standard procedures [102]. All reactions were carried out in air. The reaction progress was monitored by thin-layer chromatography (Merck F254 silica gel on aluminum plates) and visualized using 0.5% PdCl2 in 1% HCl in aq. MeOH (1:10). Acros Organics silica gel (0.060–0.200 mm) was used for column chromatography. The NMR spectra at 400.1 MHz (1H), 128.4 MHz (11B) and 100.0 MHz (13C) were recorded in acetone-d6 with Varian Inova 400 spectrometer. The residual signal of the NMR solvent relative to tetramethylsilane was taken as the internal reference for 1H and 13C NMR spectra. 11B NMR spectra were referenced using BF3.Et2O as external standard. Infrared spectra were recorded on IR Prestige-21 (SHIMADZU) instrument. High resolution mass spectra (HRMS) were measured using Bruker micrOTOF II instrument with electrospray ionization (ESI). The measurements were performed in positive ion mode (interface capillary voltage—4500 V). A syringe injection was used for solutions in acetonitrile (flow rate 3 mL/min). Nitrogen was applied as a dry gas; interface temperature was set at 180 °C.

4.2. General Procedure for Synthesis of Compounds 1–10

To a solution of propionitrilium derivative of cobalt bis(dicarbollide) (0.20 g, 0.53 mmol) in acetonitrile (10 mL) amine (1–2 mL) was added and the solution was stirred for about 10 min at room temperature. The reaction mixture was evaporated to dryness in vacuum. The desired products were isolated by column chromatography on silica with CH2Cl2 or ethyl acetate as an eluent to give orange solids of 1–10.
[8-EtC(NHMe)=HN-3,3′-Co(1,2-C2B9H10)(1′,2′-C2B9H11)] (1a,1b)
Yield 0.18 g (85%) (ratio 1a:1b = 1:1.3)
1a.1H NMR (ppm): δ 8.20 (1H, s, NHCH3), 7.05 (1H, s, NH=C), 4.20 (2H, s, CHcarb), 4.10 (2H, s, CHcarb), 3.06 (3H, d, J = 4.9 Hz, NHCH3), 2.87 (2H, q, J = 7.5 Hz, CH2), 1.23 (3H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, CH3), 4.0–0.6 (17H, br s, BH). 13C NMR (ppm): δ 168.8 (NH=C), 52.7 (CHcarb), 49.5 (CHcarb), 27.5 (NHCH3), 24.0 (CH2), 10.9 (CH3).
1b.1H NMR (ppm): 7.68 (1H, s, NH=C), 6.98 (1H, s, NHCH3), 4.20 (2H, s, CHcarb), 4.10 (2H, s, CHcarb), 3.19 (3H, d, J = 5.1 Hz, NHCH3), 2.70 (2H, q, J = 7.6 Hz, CH2), 1.28 (3H, t, J = 7.6 Hz, CH3), 4.0–0.6 (17H, br s, BH). 13C NMR (ppm): δ 168.8 (NH=C), 52.4 (CHcarb), 49.2 (CHcarb), 29.6 (NHCH3), 24.9 (CH2), 9.8 (CH3).
11B NMR (ppm): δ 12.7 (s, 1a), 10.6 (s, 1b), 8.5 (d, J = 119 Hz), 2.9 (d, J = 144 Hz), −1.4 (d, J = 146 Hz), −4.3 (d, J = 146 Hz), -5.3 (d, J = 139 Hz), −6.7 (d, J = 144 Hz), −8.0 (d, J = 174 Hz), −16.2 (d, J = 156 Hz), −18.6 (d, J = 158 Hz), −21.6 (d, J = 156 Hz), −25.6 (d, J = 143 Hz). IR (film, cm−1): 3376 (νN-H), 3294 (νN-H), 3148 (νC-H), 3040 (νC-H), 2981 (νC-H), 2945 (νC-H), 2924 (νC-H), 2570 (νB-H), 2555 (νB-H), 1640 (νN=C), 1562, 1458, 1415, 1308, 1252. Supplementary Materials HRMS: m/z for C8H31B18CoN2: calcd 427.3947 [M+NH4]+, obsd 427.3930 [M+NH4]+.
[8-EtC(NHEt)=HN-3,3′-Co(1,2-C2B9H10)(1′,2′-C2B9H11)] (2a,2b)
Yield 0.20 g (88%) (ratio 2a:2b = 1:1.8)
2a. 1H NMR (ppm): δ 8.08 (1H, s, NHCH2CH3), 7.07 (1H, s, NH=C), 4.19 (2H, s, CHcarb), 4.08 (2H, s, CHcarb), 3.46 (2H, m, NHCH2CH3), 2.84 (2H, q, J = 7.6 Hz, CH2), 1.29 (3H, t, J = 7.2 Hz, NHCH2CH3), 1.23 (3H, t, J = 7.6 Hz, CH3), 4.0–0.7 (17H, br s, BH). 13C NMR (ppm): δ 167.8 (NH=C), 52.3 (CHcarb), 49.2 (CHcarb), 36.3 (NCH2CH3), 24.0 (CH2), 12.7 (NCH2CH3), 11.4 (CH3).
2b.1H NMR (ppm): 7.68 (1H, s, NH=C), 6.90 (1H, s, NHCH2CH3), 4.21 (2H, s, CHcarb), 4.11 (2H, s, CHcarb), 3.58 (2H, m, NHCH2CH3), 2.69 (2H, q, J = 7.6 Hz, CH2), 1.30 (3H, t, J = 7.2 Hz, NHCH2CH3), 1.28 (3H, t, J = 7.6 Hz, CH3), 4.0–0.7 (17H, br s, BH). 13C NMR (ppm): δ 167.6 (NH=C), 52.8 (CHcarb), 49.4 (CHcarb), 38.4 (NCH2CH3), 24.8 (CH2, t, J = 3.7 Hz), 14.4 (NCH2CH3), 10.4 (CH3).
11B NMR (ppm): δ 12.7 (s, 2a), 10.5 (s, 2b), 8.4 (d, J = 131 Hz), 3.1 (d, J = 136 Hz), −1.4 (d, J = 144 Hz), −4.3 (d, J = 119 Hz), −5.2 (d, J = 138 Hz), −6.7 (d, J = 185 Hz), −8.1 (d, J = 169 Hz), −16.1 (d, J = 152 Hz), −18.6 (d, J = 157 Hz), −21.6 (d, J = 160 Hz), −24.9 (d, J = 146 Hz). IR (film, cm−1): 3371 (νN-H), 3314 (νN-H), 3041 (νC-H), 2982 (νC-H), 2940 (νC-H), 2894 (νC-H), 2555 (br νB-H), 1635 (νN=C), 1559, 1452, 1417, 1388, 1344, 1245. Supplementary Materials HRMS: m/z for C9H33B18CoN2: calcd 446.3658 [M+Na]+, obsd 446.3647 [M+Na]+.
[8-EtC(NHPr)=HN-3,3′-Co(1,2-C2B9H10)(1′,2′-C2B9H11)] (3a,3b)
Yield 0.20 g (96%) (ratio 3a:3b = 1:2.3)
3a.1H NMR (ppm): δ 8.10 (1H, s, NHCH2CH2CH3), 7.11 (1H, s, NH=C), 4.18 (2H, s, CHcarb), 4.07 (2H, s, CHcarb), 3.37 (2H, q, J = 7.0 Hz, NHCH2CH2CH3), 2.84 (2H, q, J = 7.6 Hz, CH2), 1.74 (2H, m, NHCH2CH2CH3), 1.23 (3H, t, J = 7.6 Hz, CH3), 0.96 (3H, t, J = 7.0 Hz, NHCH2CH2CH3), 3.9–0.6 (17H, br s, BH). 13C NMR (ppm): δ 169.3 (NH=C), 52.4 (CHcarb), 49.3 (CHcarb), 43.0 (NHCH2CH2CH3), 24.0 (CH2), 21.1(NHCH2CH2CH3), 11.5 (CH3), 10.7 (NHCH2CH2CH3).
3b. 1H NMR (ppm): 7.70 (1H, s, NH=C), 6.91 (1H, s, NHCH2CH2CH3), 4.21 (2H, s, CHcarb), 4.11 (2H, s, CHcarb), 3.50 (2H, q, J = 6.9 Hz, NHCH2CH2CH3), 2.69 (2H, q, J = 7.6 Hz, CH2), 1.71 (2H, m, NHCH2CH2CH3), 1.28 (3H, t, J = 7.6 Hz, CH3), 1.03 (3H, t, J = 7.0 Hz, NHCH2CH2CH3), 3.9–0.6 (17H, br s, BH). 13C NMR (ppm): δ 168.0 (NH=C), 52.8 (CHcarb), 49.4 (CHcarb), 45.0 (NHCH2CH2CH3), 24.9 (CH2), 22.8 (NHCH2CH2CH3), 10.5 (CH3), 10.3 (NHCH2CH2CH3).
11B NMR (ppm): δ 12.7 (s, 3a), 10.5 (s, 3b), 8.4 (d, J = 129 Hz), 3.1 (d, J = 134 Hz), −1.4 (d, J = 141 Hz), −4.4 (d, J = 127 Hz), −5.2 (d, J = 147 Hz), −6.7 (d, J = 186 Hz), −8.1 (d, J = 188 Hz), −16.1 (d, J = 157 Hz), −18.6 (d, J = 158 Hz), −21.6 (d, J = 164 Hz), −24.8 (d, J = 138 Hz). IR (film, cm−1): 3370 (νN-H), 3324 (νN-H), 3133 (νC-H), 3042 (νC-H), 2968 (νC-H), 2937 (νC-H), 2878 (νC-H), 2588 (νB-H), 2564 (νB-H), 2530 (νB-H), 1629 (νN=C), 1555, 1464, 1418, 1387, 1344, 1249. Supplementary Materials HRMS: m/z for C10H35B18CoN2: calcd 455.4262 [M+NH4]+, obsd 455.4242 [M+NH4]+.
[8-EtC(NHCH2CH2OMe)=HN-3,3′-Co(1,2-C2B9H10)(1′,2′-C2B9H11)] (4a,4b)
Yield 0.22 g (93%) (ratio 4a:4b = 1:2.0)
4a.1H NMR (ppm): δ 8.10 (1H, s, NHCH2CH2OMe), 7.86 (1H, s, NH=C), 4.16 (2H, s, CHcarb), 4.09 (2H, s, CHcarb), 3.61 (4H, m, NHCH2CH2OMe), 3.36 (3H, s, OMe), 2.88 (2H, q, J = 7.6 Hz, CH2), 1.23 (3H, t, J = 7.6 Hz, CH3), 4.0–0.9 (17H, br s, BH). 13C NMR (ppm): δ 167.9 (NH=C), 71.4 (NHCH2CH2OMe), 58.2 (NHCH2CH2OMe), 52.3 (CHcarb), 49.3 (CHcarb), 42.6 (NHCH2CH2OMe), 24.1 (CH2), 11.1 (CH3).
4b. 1H NMR (ppm): 7.68 (1H, s, NH=C), 7.28 (1H, s, NHCH2CH2OMe), 4.19 (2H, s, CHcarb), 4.09 (2H, s, CHcarb), 3.66 (2H, m, NHCH2CH2OMe), 3.62 (2H, m, NHCH2CH2OMe), 3.37 (3H, s, OMe), 2.70 (2H, q, J = 7.6 Hz, CH2), 1.27 (3H, t, J = 7.6 Hz, CH3), 4.0–0.9 (17H, br s, BH). 13C NMR (ppm): δ 167.9 (NH=C), 70.1 (NHCH2CH2OMe), 58.1 (NHCH2CH2OMe), 52.7 (CHcarb), 49.5 (CHcarb), 43.2 (NHCH2CH2OMe), 25.1 (CH2), 10.2 (CH3).
11B NMR (ppm): δ 12.7 (s, 4a), 10.9 (s, 4b), 8.3 (d, J = 123 Hz), 2.7 (d, J = 142 Hz), −1.3 (d, J = 138 Hz), −4.5 (d, J = 143 Hz), −5.4 (d, J = 144 Hz), −6.6 (d, J = 161 Hz), −8.0 (d, J = 176 Hz), −16.3 (d, J = 155 Hz), −18.8 (d, J = 158 Hz), −21.8 (d, J = 170 Hz), −25.1 (d, J = 177 Hz). IR (film, cm−1): 3354 (br νN-H), 3041 (νC-H), 2985 (νC-H), 2934 (νC-H), 2896 (νC-H), 2834 (νC-H), 2557 (br νB-H), 1638 (νN=C), 1558, 1456, 1417, 1388, 1249. Supplementary Materials HRMS: m/z for C10H35B18CoN2O: calcd 472.4169 [M+NH4]+, obsd 472.4160 [M+NH4]+.
[8-EtC(NHCH2CH2CH2OH)=HN-3,3′-Co(1,2-C2B9H10)(1′,2′-C2B9H11)] (5a,5b)
Yield 0.22 g (91%) (ratio 5a:5b = 1:1.7)
5a.1H NMR (ppm): δ 8.15 (1H, s, NHCH2CH2CH2OH), 7.45 (1H, s, NH=C), 4.16 (2H, s, CHcarb), 4.06 (2H, s, CHcarb), 3.65 (2H, m, NHCH2CH2CH2OH), 3.53 (2H, q, J = 6.3 Hz, NHCH2CH2CH2OH), 2.87 (2H, q, J = 7.5 Hz, CH2), 1.85 (2H, m, J = 6.4 Hz, NHCH2CH2CH2OH), 1.23 (3H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, CH3), 3.9–0.7 (17H, br s, BH). 13C NMR (ppm): δ 168.5 (NH=C), 58.5 (NHCH2CH2CH2OH), 52.7 (CHcarb), 49.2 (CHcarb), 38.6 (NHCH2CH2CH2OH), 30.6 (NHCH2CH2CH2OH), 24.2 (CH2), 11.1 (CH3).
5b. 1H NMR (ppm): 7.66 (1H, s, NH=C), 7.05 (1H, s, NHCH2CH2CH2OH), 4.20 (2H, s, CHcarb), 4.10 (2H, s, CHcarb), 3.70 (2H, m, NHCH2CH2CH2OH), 3.64 (2H, m, NHCH2CH2CH2OH), 2.70 (2H, q, J = 7.6 Hz, CH2), 1.85 (2H, m, J = 6.4 Hz, NHCH2CH2CH2OH), 1.28 (3H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, CH3), 3.9–0.7 (17H, br s, BH). 13C NMR (ppm): δ 167.2 (NH=C), 58.3 (NHCH2CH2CH2OH), 52.7 (CHcarb), 49.4 (CHcarb), 40.8 (NHCH2CH2CH2OH), 32.1 (NHCH2CH2CH2OH), 25.0 (CH2), 10.4 (CH3).
11B NMR (ppm): δ 12.8 (s, 5a), 10.6 (s, 5b), 8.5 (d, J = 135 Hz), 3.1 (d, J = 139 Hz), −1.3 (d, J = 146 Hz), −4.3 (d, J = 149 Hz), −5.3 (d, J = 151 Hz), −6.7 (d, J = 185 Hz), −8.1 (d, J = 186 Hz), −16.2 (d, J = 160 Hz), −18.7 (d, J = 164 Hz), −21.7 (d, J = 162 Hz), −25.0 (d). IR (film, cm−1): 3370 (br νN-H), 3325 (br νN-H), 3130 (νC-H), 3041 (νC-H), 2944 (νC-H), 2885 (νC-H), 2564 (br νB-H), 2536 (br νB-H), 1635 (νN=C), 1559, 1467, 1419, 1387, 1349, 1252. Supplementary Materials HRMS: m/z for C10H35B18CoN2O: calcd 472.4169 [M+NH4]+, obsd 472.4155 [M+NH4]+.
[8-EtC(NHCH2CH2NMe2)=HN-3,3′-Co(1,2-C2B9H10)(1′,2′-C2B9H11)] (6a,6b)
Yield 0.22 g (89%) (ratio 6a:6b = 1:2.0)
6a.1H NMR (ppm): δ 10.16 (1H, s, NH=C), 7.94 (1H, s, NHCH2CH2NMe2), 4.14 (2H, s, CHcarb), 4.08 (2H, s, CHcarb), 3.47 (2H, m, NHCH2CH2NMe2), 2.89 (2H, q, J = 7.6 Hz, CH2), 2.58 (2H, m, NHCH2CH2NMe2), 2.31 (6H, s, NMe2), 1.22 (3H, t, J = 7.6 Hz, CH3), 4.0–0.8 (17H, br s, BH). 13C NMR (ppm): δ 167.1 (NH=C), 59.3 (NHCH2CH2NMe2), 52.2 (CHcarb), 49.2 (CHcarb), 45.3 (NMe2), 41.9 (NHCH2CH2NMe2), 24.2 (CH2), 11.0 (CH3).
6b. 1H NMR (ppm): δ 7.78 (1H, s, NH=C), 7.53 (1H, s, NHCH2CH2NMe2), 4.18 (2H, s, CHcarb), 4.08 (2H, s, CHcarb), 3.54 (2H, m, NHCH2CH2NMe2), 2.68 (2H, q, J = 7.6 Hz, CH2), 2.57 (2H, m, NHCH2CH2NMe2), 2.27 (6H, s, NMe2), 1.27 (3H, t, J = 7.6 Hz, CH3), 4.0–0.8 (17H, br s, BH). 13C NMR (ppm): δ 167.1 (NH=C), 56.2 (NHCH2CH2NMe2), 52.6 (CHcarb), 49.4 (CHcarb), 43.9 (NMe2), 40.4 (NHCH2CH2NMe2), 25.6 (CH2), 9.9 (CH3).
11B NMR (ppm): δ 12.7 (s, 6a), 10.9 (s, 6b), 8.3 (d, J = 123 Hz), 2.7 (d, J = 142 Hz), −1.3 (d, J = 142 Hz), −4.5 (d, J = 143 Hz), −5.4 (d, J = 144 Hz), −6.6 (d, J = 161 Hz), −8.0 (d, J = 176 Hz), −16.3 (d, J = 154 Hz), −18.8 (d, J = 160 Hz), −21.8 (d, J = 168 Hz), −25.1 (d, J = 164 Hz). IR (film, cm−1): 3309 (br νN-H), 3041 (νC-H), 2977 (νC-H), 2948 (νC-H), 2863 (νC-H), 2828 (νC-H), 2779 (νC-H), 2568 (br νB-H), 1629 (νN=C), 1550, 1507, 1465, 1457, 1250. ESI HRMS: m/z for C11H38B18CoN3: calcd 489.4082 [M+Na]+, obsd 489.4085 [M+Na]+.
[8-EtC(NMe2)=HN-3,3′-Co(1,2-C2B9H10)(1′,2′-C2B9H11)] (7)
Yield 0.20 g (88%). 1H NMR (ppm): δ 6.93 (1H, s, NH), 4.17 (2H, s, CHcarb), 4.08 (2H, s, CHcarb), 3.38 (3H, s, NCH3), 3.26 (3H, s, NCH3), 2.95 (2H, q, J = 7.5 Hz, CH2), 1.18 (3H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, CH3), 3.9–0.7 (17H, br s, BH). 13C NMR (ppm): δ 168.5 (NH=C), 52.4 (CHcarb), 49.2 (CHcarb), 39.9 (NCH3), 37.8 (NCH3), 22.0 (CH2), 10.4 (CH3). 11B NMR (ppm): δ 13.1 (1B, s), 8.7 (1B, d, J = 142 Hz), 2.6 (1B, d, J = 144 Hz), −1.3 (1B, d, J = 146 Hz), −4.2 (2B, d, J = 169 Hz), −5.5 (2B, d, J = 135 Hz), −6.4 (2B, d, J = 132 Hz), −7.7 (2B, d, J = 163 Hz), −16.3 (2B, d, J = 162 Hz), −18.5 (2B, d, J = 163 Hz), −21.6 (1B, d, J = 167 Hz), −25.6 (1B, d, J = 169 Hz). IR (film, cm−1): 3385 (νN-H), 3039 (νC-H),, 2987 (νC-H), 2944 (νC-H), 2924 (νC-H), 2854 (νC-H), 2605 (νB-H), 2576 (νB-H), 2555 (νB-H), 1615 (νN=C), 1512, 1458, 1434, 1380, 1245. Supplementary Materials HRMS: m/z for C9H33B18CoN2: calcd 440.4135 [M+NH4]+, obsd 440.4121 [M+NH4]+.
[8-EtC(NEt2)=HN-3,3′-Co(1,2-C2B9H10)(1′,2′-C2B9H11)] (8)
Yield 0.22 g (91%). 1H NMR (ppm): δ 6.88 (1H, s, NH), 4.19 (2H, s, CHcarb), 4.10 (2H, s, CHcarb), 3.66 (4H, m, NCH2CH3), 2.94 (2H, q, J = 7.5 Hz, CH2), 1.29 (3H, t, J = 7.2 Hz, NCH2CH3), 1.27 (3H, t, J = 7.2 Hz, NCH2CH3), 1.19 (3H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, CH3), 3.9–0.7 (17H, br s, BH). 13C NMR (ppm): δ 167.7 (NH=C), 52.4 (CHcarb), 49.2 (CHcarb), 45.0 (NCH2CH3), 41.9 (NCH2CH3), 21.1 (CH2), 13.1 (NCH2CH3), 11.6 (CH3), 11.1 (NCH2CH3). 11B NMR (ppm): δ 13.2 (1B, s), 8.6 (1B, d, J = 141 Hz), 2.5 (1B, d, J = 144 Hz), −1.3 (1B, d, J = 144 Hz), −4.2 (2B, d, J = 152 Hz), −5.4 (2B, d, J = 139 Hz), −6.4 (2B, d, J = 142 Hz), −7.6 (2B, d, J = 141 Hz), −16.3 (2B, d, J = 160 Hz), −18.4 (2B, d, J = 170 Hz), −21.6 (1B, d, J = 163 Hz), −25.6 (1B, d, J = 175 Hz). IR (film, cm−1): 3389 (νN-H), 3043 (νC-H), 2975 (νC-H), 2943 (νC-H), 2608 (νB-H), 2574 (νB-H), 2545 (νB-H), 1606 (νN=C), 1507, 1496, 1450, 1383, 1358, 1238. Supplementary Materials HRMS: m/z for C11H37B18CoN2: calcd 470.4377 [M+NH4]+, obsd 470.4354 [M+NH4]+.
[8-EtC(NC5H10)=HN-3,3′-Co(1,2-C2B9H10)(1′,2′-C2B9H11)] (9)
Yield 0.23 g (94%). 1H NMR (ppm): δ 7.01 (1H, s, NH), 4.17 (2H, s, CHcarb), 4.08 (2H, s, CHcarb), 3.73 (4H, m, NCH2), 3.02 (2H, q, J = 7.5 Hz, CH2), 1.74 (6H, m, -CH2-), 1.16 (3H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, CH3), 4.0–0.7 (17H, br s, BH). 13C NMR (ppm): δ 173.1 (NH=C), 52.2 (CHcarb), 49.4 (CHcarb), 49.2 (NCH2), 46.3 (NCH2), 26.5 (CH2), 25.3 (CH2), 23.5 (CH2), 21.5 (CH2), 11.3 (CH3). 11B NMR (ppm): δ 13.2 (1B, s), 8.6 (1B, d, J = 141 Hz), 2.5 (1B, d, J = 144 Hz), −1.2 (1B, d, J = 145 Hz), −4.3 (2B, d, J = 153 Hz), −5.4 (2B, d, J = 117 Hz), −6.0 (2B, d, J = 119 Hz), −7.8 (2B, d, J = 152 Hz), −16.4 (2B, d, J = 154 Hz), −18.6 (2B, d, J = 156 Hz), −21.7 (1B, d, J = 166 Hz), −25.4 (1B, d, J = 151 Hz). IR (film, cm−1): 3381 (νN-H), 3040 (νC-H), 2976 (νC-H), 2945 (νC-H), 2862 (νC-H), 2568 (br νB-H), 1601 (νN=C), 1506, 1485, 1457, 1445, 1382, 1361, 1248. Supplementary Materials HRMS: m/z for C12H37B18CoN2: calcd 502.3715 [M+K]+, obsd 502.3714 [M+K]+.
[8-EtC(NC4H8O)=HN-3,3′-Co(1,2-C2B9H10)(1′,2′-C2B9H11)] (10)
Yield 0.23 g (93%). 1H NMR (ppm): δ 7.17 (1H, s, NH), 4.17 (2H, s, CHcarb), 4.08 (2H, s, CHcarb), 3.79 (8H, m, NCH2 + OCH2), 3.06 (2H, q, J = 7.5 Hz, CH2), 1.17 (3H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, CH3), 3.9–0.6 (17H, br s, BH). 13C NMR (ppm): δ 170.4 (NH=C), 69.3 (OCH2), 68.4 (OCH2), 55.1 (CHcarb), 52.1 (CHcarb), 51.2 (NCH2), 48.4 (NCH2), 24.2 (CH2), 13.8 (CH3). 11B NMR (ppm): δ 13.0 (1B, s), 8.6 (1B, d, J = 131 Hz), 2.6 (1B, d, J = 140 Hz), −1.0 (1B, d, J = 143 Hz), −4.3 (2B, d, J = 137 Hz), −5.4 (2B, d, J = 123 Hz), −6.0 (2B, d, J = 121 Hz), −7.8 (2B, d, J = 153 Hz), −16.4 (2B, d, J = 156 Hz), −18.6 (2B, d, J = 158 Hz), −21.7 (1B, d, J = 147 Hz), −25.3 (1B, d, J = 136 Hz). IR (film, cm−1): 3377 (νN-H), 3338 (νN-H), 3041 (νC-H), 2977 (νC-H), 2929 (νC-H), 2860 (νC-H), 2588 (νB-H), 2563 (νB-H), 2534 (νB-H), 1604 (νN=C), 1588, 1506, 1456, 1382, 1363, 1249. Supplementary Materials HRMS: m/z for C11H35B18CoN2O: calcd 488.3765 [M+Na]+, obsd 488.3748 [M+Na]+.

4.3. Single Crystal X-ray Diffraction Study

X-ray experiments for compounds 7, 8 and 9 were carried out using SMART APEX2 CCD diffractometer (λ(Mo-Kα)=0.71073 Å, graphite monochromator, ω-scans) at 120 K. Collected data were processed by the SAINT and SADABS programs incorporated into the APEX2 program package [103]. The structures were solved by the direct methods and refined by the full-matrix least-squares procedure against F2 in anisotropic approximation. The refinement was carried out with the SHELXTL program [104]. Compound 9 crystallizes in the form of dihydrate. All water molecules are significantly disordered and were eliminated from the refinement using common SQUIZZE option. The CCDC numbers (2114706, 2114707 and 2114708, for 7, 8 and 9, respectively) contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif (accessed on 9 October 2021).
Crystallographic data for 7: C9H33B18CoN2 are orthorhombic, space group Pna21: a = 27.1787(4) Å, b = 7.08410(10) Å, c = 11.5151(2) Å, V = 2217.08(6) Å3, Z = 4, M = 422.88, dcryst = 1.267 g·cm−3. wR2 = 0.0619 calculated on F2hkl for all 5112 independent reflections with 2θ < 56.0°, (GOF = 1.078, R = 0.0277 calculated on Fhkl for 4862 reflections with I > 2σ(I)).
Crystallographic data for 8: C11H37B18CoN2 are orthorhombic, space group Pca21: a = 13.3717(4) Å, b = 16.2810(5) Å, c = 11.2565(3) Å, V = 2450.59(12) Å3, Z = 4, M = 450.93, dcryst = 1.222 g·cm−3. wR2 = 0.0734 calculated on F2hkl for all 5343 independent reflections with 2θ < 54.2°, (GOF = 1.025, R = 0.0326 calculated on Fhkl for 4406 reflections with I > 2σ(I)).
Crystallographic data for 9: C12H37B18CoN2·2H2O are tetragonal, space group I41/a: a = b = 39.0901(11) Å, c = 6.9515(3) Å, V = 10,622.1(8) Å3, Z = 16, M = 498.98, dcryst = 1.248 g·cm−3. wR2 = 0.1626 calculated on F2hkl for all 5836 independent reflections with 2θ < 54.3°, (GOF = 1.028, R = 0.0684 calculated on Fhkl for 3384 reflections with I > 2σ(I)).

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online. Copies of 1H, 13C-NMR, 11B NMR, (HH)gCOSY NMR, NOESY NMR and main crystallographic data for compounds 7, 8 and 9.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.B.S. and M.Y.S.; methodology, I.B.S. and M.Y.S.; validation, V.I.B.; formal analysis, K.Y.S.; synthesis, E.V.B. and M.Y.S.; writing, M.Y.S. and I.B.S.; NMR investigation, M.Y.S.; IR investigation, M.Y.S.; X-ray diffraction study; editing V.I.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (No. 21-73-10199).

Acknowledgments

The X-ray diffraction and NMR spectral data were obtained using equipment of the Center for Molecular Structure Studies at A.N. Nesmeyanov Institute of Organoelement Compounds operating with financial support of Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hawthorne, M.F.; Andrews, T.D. Carborane analogues of cobalticinium ion. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1965, 19, 443–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hawthorne, M.F.; Young, D.; Andrews, T.D.; Hove, D.V.; Pilling, R.L.; Pitts, A.D.; Reintjes, M.; Warren, L.F.; Wegner, P.A. π-Dicarbollyl derivatives of the transition metals. Metallocene analogs. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 879–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sivaev, I.B.; Bregadze, V.I. Chemistry of cobalt bis(dicarbollides). A review. Collect. Czechoslov. Chem. Commun. 2002, 64, 783–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Dash, B.P.; Satapathy, R.; Swain, B.R.; Mahanta, C.S.; Jena, B.B.; Hosmane, N.S. Cobalt bis(dicarbollide) anion and its derivatives. J. Organomet. Chem. 2017, 849–850, 170–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kennedy, R.D.; Clingerman, D.J.; Morris, W.; Wilmer, C.E.; Sarjeant, A.A.; Stern, C.L.; O’Keeffe, M.; Snurr, R.Q.; Hupp, J.T.; Farha, O.K.; et al. Metallacarborane-based metal-organic framework with a complex topology. Cryst. Growth Des. 2014, 14, 1324–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tarres, M.; Arderiu, V.S.; Zaulet, A.; Viñas, C.; Fabrizi de Biani, F.; Teixidor, F. How to get the desired reduction voltage in a single framework! Metallacarborane as an optimal probe for sequential voltage tuning. Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 11690–11695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Buades, A.B.; Arderiu, V.S.; Olid-Britos, D.; Viñas, C.; Sillanpää, R.; Haukka, M.; Fontrodona, X.; Paradinas, M.; Ocal, C.; Teixidor, F. Electron accumulative molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 2957–2970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bregadze, V.I.; Dyachenko, O.A.; Kazheva, O.N.; Kravchenko, A.V.; Sivaev, I.B.; Starodub, V.A. Tetrathiafulvalene-based radical cation salts with transition metal bis(dicarbollide) anions. CrystEngComm 2015, 17, 4754–4767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bregadze, V.I.; Dyachenko, O.A.; Kazheva, O.N.; Kosenko, I.D.; Kravchenko, A.V.; Sivaev, I.B.; Starodub, V.A. Electroconducting radical-cation salts based on tetrathiafulvalene derivatives and transition metal bis(dicarbollides). Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 2019, 89, 971–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pichaandi, K.R.; Nilakantan, L.; Safronov, A.V.; Sevryugina, Y.V.; Jalisatgi, S.S.; Hawthorne, M.F. Electronic interactions between ferrocenyl units facilitated by the cobalt bis(dicarbollide) anion linker: An experimental and DFT study. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 666–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Anufriev, S.A.; Erokhina, S.A.; Suponitsky, K.Y.; Godovikov, I.A.; Filippov, O.A.; Fabrizi de Biani, F.; Corsini, M.; Chizhov, A.O.; Sivaev, I.B. Methylsulfanyl-stabilized rotamers of cobalt bis(dicarbollide). Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 4444–4451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Anufriev, S.A.; Timofeev, S.V.; Anisimov, A.A.; Suponitsky, K.Y.; Sivaev, I.B. Bis(dicarbollide) complexes of transition metals as a platform for molecular switches. Study of complexation of 8,8′-bis(methylsulfanyl) derivatives of cobalt and iron bis(dicarbollides). Molecules 2020, 25, 5745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fuentes, I.; Garcıa-Mendiola, T.; Sato, S.; Pita, M.; Nakamura, H.; Lorenzo, E.; Teixidor, F.; Marques, F.; Viñas, C. Metallacarboranes on the road to anticancer therapies: Cellular uptake, DNA interaction, and biological evaluation of cobaltabisdicarbollide [COSAN]−. Chem. Eur. J. 2018, 24, 17239–17254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Řezačova, P.; Cigler, P.; Matejiček, P.; Lepšik, M.; Pokorna, J.; Grüner, B.; Konvalinka, J. Medicinal application of carboranes: Inhibition of HIV protease. In Boron Science: New Technologies and Applications; Hosmane, N.S., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2012; pp. 41–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Grüner, B.; Brynda, J.; Das, V.; Šicha, V.; Stepankova, J.; Nekvinda, J.; Holub, J.; Pospisilova, K.; Fabry, M.; Pachtl, P.; et al. Metallacarborane sulfamides: Unconventional, specific, and highly selective inhibitors of carbonic anhydrase IX. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 62, 9560–9575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Grüner, B.; Kugler, M.; El Anwar, S.; Holub, J.; Nekvinda, J.; Bavol, D.; Růžičková, Z.; Pospíšilová, K.; Fábry, M.; Král, V.; et al. Cobalt bis(dicarbollide) alkylsulfonamides: Potent and highly selective inhibitors of tumor specific carbonic anhydrase IX. ChemPlusChem 2021, 86, 352–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kugler, M.; Nekvinda, J.; Holub, J.; El Anwar, S.; Das, V.; Šícha, V.; Pospíšilová, K.; Fábry, M.; Král, V.; Brynda, J.; et al. Inhibitors of CA IX enzyme based on polyhedral boron compounds. ChemBioChem 2021, 22, 2741–2761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Nekvinda, J.; Rozycka, D.; Rykowski, S.; Wyszko, E.; Fedoruk-Wyszomirska, A.; Gurda, D.; Orlicka-Płocka, M.; Giel-Pietraszuk, M.; Kiliszek, A.; Rypniewski, W.; et al. Synthesis of naphthalimide-carborane and metallacarborane conjugates: Anticancer activity, DNA binding ability. Bioorg. Chem. 2020, 94, 103432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Olejniczak, A.B.; Nawrot, B.; Lesnikowski, Z.J. DNA modified with boron-metal cluster complexes [M(C2B9H11)2]-: Synthesis, properties, and applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Grin, M.A.; Titeev, R.A.; Brittal, D.I.; Ulybina, O.V.; Tsiprovskiy, A.G.; Berzina, M.Y.; Lobanova, I.A.; Sivaev, I.B.; Bregadze, V.I.; Mironov, A.F. New conjugates of cobalt bis(dicarbollide) with chlorophyll a derivatives. Mendeleev Commun. 2011, 21, 84–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Efremenko, A.V.; Ignatova, A.A.; Grin, M.A.; Sivaev, I.B.; Mironov, A.F.; Bregadze, V.I.; Feofanov, A.V. Chlorin e6 fused with a cobalt-bis(dicarbollide) nanoparticle provides efficient boron delivery and photoinduced cytotoxicity in cancer cells. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2014, 13, 92–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Volovetsky, A.B.; Sukhov, V.S.; Balalaeva, I.V.; Dudenkova, V.V.; Shilyagina, N.Y.; Feofanov, A.V.; Efremenko, A.V.; Grin, M.A.; Mironov, A.F.; Sivaev, I.B.; et al. Pharmacokinetics of chlorin e6-cobalt bis(dicarbollide) conjugate in balb/c mice with engrafted carcinoma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Bregadze, V.I.; Sivaev, I.B.; Dubey, R.D.; Semioshkin, A.; Shmal’ko, A.V.; Kosenko, I.D.; Lebedeva, K.V.; Mandal, S.; Sreejyothi, P.; Sarkar, A.; et al. Boron-containing lipids and liposomes: New conjugates of cholesterol with polyhedral boron hydrides. Chem. Eur. J. 2020, 26, 13832–13841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Druzina, A.A.; Shmalko, A.V.; Andreichuk, E.P.; Zhidkova, O.B.; Kosenko, I.D.; Semioshkin, A.; Sivaev, I.B.; Mandal, S.; Shen, Z.; Bregadze, V.I. ‘Click’ synthesis of cobalt bis(dicarbollide)–cholesterol conjugates. Mendeleev. Commun. 2019, 29, 628–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dubey, R.D.; Sarkar, A.; Shen, Z.; Bregadze, V.I.; Sivaev, I.B.; Druzina, A.A.; Zhidkova, O.B.; Shmal’ko, A.V.; Kosenko, I.D.; Sreejyothi, P.; et al. Effects of linkers on the development of liposomal formulation of cholesterol conjugated cobalt bis(dicarbollides). J. Pharm. Sci. 2021, 110, 1365–1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zheng, Y.; Liu, W.; Chen, Y.; Jiang, H.; Yan, H.; Kosenko, I.; Chekulaeva, L.; Sivaev, I.; Bregadze, V.; Wang, X. A highly potent antibacterial agent targeting methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus based on cobalt bis(1,2-dicarbollide) alkoxy derivative. Organometallics 2017, 36, 3484–3490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Swietnicki, W.; Goldeman, W.; Psurski, M.; Nasulewicz-Goldeman, A.; Boguszewska-Czubara, A.; Drab, M.; Sycz, J.; Goszczyński, T.M. Metallacarborane derivatives effective against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Yersinia enterocolitica. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 6762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fink, K.; Uchman, M. Boron cluster compounds as new chemical leads for antimicrobial therapy. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2021, 431, 213684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Druzina, A.A.; Shmalko, A.V.; Sivaev, I.B.; Bregadze, V.I. Cyclic oxonium derivatives of cobalt and iron bis(dicarbollides) and their use in organic synthesis. Russ. Chem. Rev. 2021, 90, 785–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Van Dijk, T.; Slootweg, J.C.; Lammertsma, K. Nitrilium ions—Synthesis and applications. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2017, 15, 10134–10144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Michelin, R.A.; Mozzon, M.; Bertani, R. Reactions of transition metal-coordinated nitriles. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1996, 147, 299–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kukushkin, V.Y.; Pombeiro, A.J.L. Additions to metal-activated organonitriles. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 1771–1802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kukushkin, V.Y.; Pombeiro, A.J.L. Metal-mediated and metal-catalyzed hydrolysis of nitriles. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2005, 358, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bokach, N.A.; Kukushkin, V.Y. Addition of HO-nucleophiles to free and coordinated nitriles. Russ. Chem. Rev. 2005, 74, 153–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bolotin, D.S.; Bokach, N.A.; Demakova, M.Y.; Kukushkin, V.Y. Metal-involving synthesis and reactions of oximes. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 13039–13122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Stogniy, M.Y.; Erokhina, S.A.; Sivaev, I.B.; Bregadze, V.I. Nitrilium derivatives of polyhedral boron compounds (boranes, carboranes, metallocarboranes): Synthesis and reactivity. Phosphorus Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem. 2019, 194, 983–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhdanov, A.P.; Bykov, A.Y.; Kubasov, A.S.; Polyakova, I.N.; Razgonyaeva, G.A.; Zhizhin, K.Y.; Kuznetsov, N.T. Hydrolysis of nitrilium derivatives of the closo-decaborate anion [2-B10H9(N≡CR)]- (R = CH3, C2H5, C(CH3)3, or C6H5). Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 62, 468–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Voinova, V.V.; Selivanov, N.A.; Plyushchenko, I.V.; Vokuev, M.F.; Bykov, A.Y.; Klyukin, I.N.; Novikov, A.S.; Zhdanov, A.P.; Grigoriev, M.S.; Rodin, I.A.; et al. Fused 1,2-diboraoxazoles based on closo-decaborate anion—Novel members of diboroheterocycle class. Molecules 2021, 26, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhdanov, A.P.; Klyukin, I.N.; Bykov, A.Y.; Grigoriev, M.S.; Zhizhin, K.Y.; Kuznetsov, N.T. Nucleophilic addition of alcohols to anionic [2-B10H9NCR]− (R=Et, t-Bu): An approach to producing new borylated imidates. Polyhedron 2017, 123, 176–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhdanov, A.P.; Polyakova, I.N.; Razgonyaeva, G.A.; Zhizhin, K.Y.; Kuznetsov, N.T. Reactions of nucleophilic addition of primary amines to the nitrilium derivative of the closo-decaborate anion [2-B10H9(N≡CCH3)]−. Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2011, 56, 847–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhdanov, A.P.; Nelyubin, A.V.; Klyukin, I.N.; Selivanov, N.A.; Bortnikov, E.O.; Grigoriev, M.S.; Zhizhin, K.Yu.; Kuznetsov, N.T. Nucleophilic addition reaction of secondary amines to acetonitrilium closo-decaborate [2-B10H9NCCH3]−. Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 64, 841–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Burianova, V.K.; Bolotin, D.S.; Mikhredov, A.S.; Novikov, A.S.; Mokolokolo, P.P.; Roodt, A.; Boyarskiy, V.P.; Dar’in, D.; Krasavin, M.; Suslonov, V.V.; et al. Mechanism of generation of closo-decaborato amidrazones. Intramolecular non-covalent B–H⋯π(Ph) interaction determines stabilization of the configuration around the amidrazone C=N bond. New J. Chem. 2018, 42, 8693–8703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bolotin, D.S.; Burianova, V.K.; Novikov, A.S.; Demakova, M.Y.; Pretorius, C.; Mokolokolo, P.P.; Roodt, A.; Bokach, N.A.; Suslonov, V.V.; Zhdanov, A.P.; et al. Nucleophilicity of oximes based upon addition to a nitrilium closo-decaborate cluster. Organometallics 2016, 35, 3612–3623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bolotin, D.S.; Demakova, M.Y.; Daines, E.A.; Avdontseva, M.S.; Zhdanov, A.P.; Zhizhin, K.Yu.; Kuznetsov, N.T. Nucleophilic addition of aromatic amide oximes to [2-B10H9NCC2H5]- anion. Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 2017, 87, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mindich, A.L.; Bokach, N.A.; Kuznetsov, M.L.; Haukka, M.; Zhdanov, A.P.; Zhizhin, K.Y.; Miltsov, S.A.; Kuznetsov, N.T.; Kukushkin, V.Y. Coupling of azomethine ylides with nitrilium derivatives of closo-decaborate clusters: A synthetic and theoretical study. ChemPlusChem 2012, 77, 1075–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Daines, E.A.; Bolotin, D.S.; Bokach, N.A.; Gurzhiy, V.V.; Zhdanov, A.P.; Zhizhin, K.Y.; Kuznetsov, N.T. Push-pull alkenes bearing closo-decaborate cluster generated via nucleophilic addition of carbanions to borylated nitrilium salts. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2018, 471, 372–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mindich, A.L.; Bokach, N.A.; Kuznetsov, M.L.; Starova, G.L.; Zhdanov, A.P.; Zhizhin, K.Y.; Miltsov, S.A.; Kuznetsov, N.T.; Kukushkin, V.Y. Borylated tetrazoles from cycloaddition of azide anions to nitrilium derivatives of closo-decaborate clusters. Organometallics 2013, 32, 6576–6586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Mindich, A.L.; Bokach, N.A.; Dolgushin, F.M.; Haukka, M.; Lisitsyn, L.A.; Zhdanov, A.P.; Zhizhin, K.Y.; Miltsov, S.A.; Kuznetsov, N.T.; Kukushkin, V.Y. 1,3-Dipolar cycloaddition of nitrones to a nitrile functionality in closo-decaborate clusters: A novel reactivity mode for the borylated C≡N group. Organometallics 2012, 31, 1716–1724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Šícha, V.; Plešek, J.; Kvíčalová, M.; Císařová, I.; Grüner, B. Boron(8) substituted nitrilium and ammonium derivatives, versatile cobalt bis(1,2-dicarbollide) building blocks for synthetic purposes. Dalton Trans. 2009, 851–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. El Anwar, S.; Růžičková, Z.; Bavol, D.; Fojt, L.; Grüner, B. Tetrazole Ring substitution at carbon and boron sites of the cobalt bis(dicarbollide) ion available via dipolar cycloadditions. Inorg. Chem. 2020, 59, 17430–17442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Bogdanova, E.V.; Stogniy, M.Y.; Chekulaeva, L.A.; Anisimov, A.A.; Suponitsky, K.Y.; Sivaev, I.B.; Grin, M.A.; Mironov, A.F.; Bregadze, V.I. Synthesis and reactivity of propionitrilium derivatives of cobalt and iron bis(dicarbollides). New J. Chem. 2020, 44, 15836–15848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Shriner, R.; Neumann, F. The chemistry of the amidines. Chem. Rev. 1944, 35, 351–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Patai, S. (Ed.) The Chemistry of Amidines and Imidates, Vol. 1 (PATAI’S Chemistry of Functional Groups); John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: London, UK, 1975; 677p. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Patai, S.; Rappoport, Z. (Eds.) The Chemistry of Amidines and Imidates, Vol. 2 (PATAI’S Chemistry of Functional Groups); John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 1991; 924p. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Granik, V.G. Advances in the chemistry of amidines. Russ. Chem. Rev. 1983, 52, 669–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Aly, A.A.; Bräse, S.; Gomaa, M.A.-M. Amidines: Their synthesis, reactivity, and applications in heterocycle synthesis. ARKIVOC 2018, 85–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Chen, X.M.; Orser, B.A.; MacDonald, J.F. Design and screening of ASIC inhibitors based on aromatic diamidines for combating neurological disorders. Eur. J. Pharm. 2010, 648, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kotthaus, J.; Steinmetzer, T.; van de Locht, A.; Clement, B. Analysis of highly potent amidine containing inhibitors of serine proteases and their N-hydroxylated prodrugs (amidoximes). J. Enzyme Inhibition Med. Chem. 2011, 26, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Huang, T.L.; Mayence, A.; Vanden Eynde, J.J. Some non-conventional biomolecular targets for diamidines. A short survey. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2014, 22, 1983–1992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Krstulović, L.; Stolić, I.; Jukić, M.; Opačak-Bernardi, T.; Starčević, K.; Bajić, M.; Glavaš-Obrovac, L. New quinoline-arylamidine hybrids: Synthesis, DNA/RNA binding and antitumor activity. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 137, 196–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Rastija, V.; Jukić, M.; Opačak-Bernardi, T.; Krstulović, L.; Stolić, I.; Glavaš-Obrovac, L.; Bajić, M. Investigation of the structural and physicochemical requirements of quinoline-arylamidine hybrids for the growth inhibition of K562 and Raji leukemia cells. Turk. J. Chem. 2019, 43, 251–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Yadava, U.; Yadav, S.K.; Yadav, R.K. Investigations on bisamidine derivatives as novel minor groove binders with the dodecamer 5′(CGCGAATTCGCG)3′. J. Mol. Liq. 2019, 280, 135–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Behrouz, S.; Kühl, N.; Klein, C.D. A facile approach towards amidinophenylalanine derivatives as building blocks for the synthesis of non-natural peptides and peptidomimetics. Tetrahedron Lett. 2021, 81, 153342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ishikawa, T.; Kumamoto, T. Amidines in Organic Synthesis. In Superbases for Organic Synthesis: Guanidines, Amidines, Phosphazenes and Related Organocatalysts; Ishikawa, T., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2009; pp. 49–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Taylor, J.E.; Bull, S.D.; Williams, J.M.J. Amidines, isothioureas, and guanidines as nucleophilic catalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 2109–2121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Davis, Y.A.; Danneman, M.W.; Johnston, J.N. Chiral proton catalysis of secondary nitroalkane additions to azomethine: Synthesis of a potent GlyT1 inhibitor. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 5578–5580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Vara, B.A.; Mayasundari, A.; Tellis, J.C.; Danneman, M.W.; Arredondo, V.; Davis, T.A.; Min, J.; Finch, K.; Guy, R.K.; Johnston, J.N. Organocatalytic, diastereo- and enantioselective synthesis of nonsymmetric cis-stilbene diamines: A platform for the preparation of single-enantiomer cis-imidazolines for protein-protein inhibition. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 6913–6938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Ahlemeyer, N.A.; Streff, E.V.; Muthupandi, P.; Birman, V.B. Dramatic acceleration of an acyl transfer-initiated cascade by using electron-rich amidine-based catalysts. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 6486–6489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Wang, J.; Xu, F.; Cai, T.; Shen, Q. Addition of amines to nitriles catalyzed by ytterbium amides:  An efficient one-step synthesis of monosubstituted N-arylamidines. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 445–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Li, W.; Xue, M.; Xu, F.; Tu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Shen, Q. Synthesis, characterization of bridged bis(amidinate) lanthanide amides and their application as catalysts for addition of amines to nitriles for monosubstituted N-arylamidines. Dalton Trans. 2012, 8252–8260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Garduño, J.A.; García, J.J. Synthesis of amidines and benzoxazoles from activated nitriles with Ni(0) catalysts. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 3470–3477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Froehner, G.; Challis, K.; Gagnon, K.; Getman, T.D.; Luck, R.L. A re-investigation of the reactions of amines and alcohols with 6,9-bis-(acetonitrile)decaborane. Synth. React. Inorg. Met. Org. Chem. 2006, 36, 777–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Getman, T.D.; Luck, R.L.; Cienkus, C. 2-[(1-{[3-(dimethylazaniumyl)propyl]-methylaminoethylidene)azaniumyl]- nonahydro-closo-decaborate dimethyl sulfoxide disolvate. Acta Cryst. E 2011, 67, o1682–o1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Losytskyy, M.Y.; Kovalska, V.B.; Varzatskii, O.A.; Kuperman, M.V.; Potocki, S.; Gumienna-Kontecka, E.; Zhdanov, A.P.; Yarmoluk, S.M.; Voloshin, Y.Z.; Zhizhin, K.Y.; et al. An interaction of the functionalized closo-borates with albumins: The protein fluorescence quenching and calorimetry study. J. Lumin. 2016, 169, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Nelyubin, A.V.; Klyukin, I.N.; Zhdanov, A.P.; Grigoriev, M.S.; Zhizhin, K.Y.; Kuznetsov, N.T. Synthesis of substituted derivatives of closo-decaborate anion with a peptide bond: The way towards designing biologically active boron-containing compounds. Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 64, 1499–1506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Nelyubin, A.V.; Klyukin, I.N.; Novikov, A.S.; Zhdanov, A.P.; Grigoriev, M.S.; Zhizhin, K.Y.; Kuznetsov, N.T. Nucleophilic addition of amino acid esters to nitrilium derivatives of closo-decaborate anion. Mendeleev Commun. 2021, 31, 201–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Stogniy, M.Yu.; Erokhina, S.A.; Suponitsky, K.Y.; Anisimov, A.A.; Godovikov, I.A.; Sivaev, I.B.; Bregadze, V.I. Synthesis of novel carboranyl amidines. J. Organomet. Chem. 2020, 909, 121111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Stogniy, M.Y.; Erokhina, S.A.; Anisimov, A.A.; Suponitsky, K.Y.; Sivaev, I.B.; Bregadze, V.I. 10-NCCH2CH2OCH2CH2C≡N-7,8-C2B9H11: Synthesis and reactions with various nucleophiles. Polyhedron 2019, 174, 114170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Stogniy, M.Y.; Erokhina, S.A.; Suponitsky, K.Y.; Markov, V.Y.; Sivaev, I.B. Synthesis and crystal structures of nickel(II) and palladium(II) complexes with o-carboranyl amidine ligands. Dalton Trans. 2021, 50, 4967–4975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Nelyubin, A.V.; Selivanov, N.A.; Klyukin, I.N.; Bykov, A.Y.; Zhdanov, A.P.; Zhizhin, K.Y.; Kuznetsov, N.T. New method for synthesis of substituted N-borylated dipeptides based on acetonitrile derivative of the closo-dodecaborate anion. Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2021, 66, 1390–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Makarycheva-Mikhailova, A.V.; Kukushkin, V.Y.; Nazarov, A.A.; Garnovskii, D.A.; Pombeiro, A.J.L.; Haukka, M.; Keppler, B.K.; Galanski, M. Amidines derived from Pt(IV)-mediated nitrile-amino alcohol coupling and their Zn(II)-catalyzed conversion into oxazolines. Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42, 2805–2813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Kalz, K.F.; Hausmann, A.; Dechert, S.; Meyer, S.; John, M.; Meyer, F. Solution chemistry of N,N’-disubstituted amidines: Identification of isomers and evidence for linear dimer formation. Chem. Eur. J. 2016, 22, 18190–18196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Belluco, U.; Benetollo, F.; Bertani, R.; Bombieri, G.; Michelin, R.A.; Mozzon, M.; Pombeiro, A.J.L.; Guedes da Silva, F.C. Stereochemical investigation of the addition of primary and secondary aliphatic amines to the nitrile complexes cis- and trans-[PtCl2(NCMe)2]. X-ray structures of the amidine complexes trans-[Pt(NH2Pri)2{Z-N(H)=C(NHPri)Me}]Cl2·4H2O and trans-[PtCl2(NCMe){E-N(H)=C(NMeBut)Me}]. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2002, 330, 229–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Belluco, U.; Benetollo, F.; Bertani, R.; Bombieri, G.; Michelin, R.A.; Mozzon, M.; Tonon, O.; Pombeiro, A.J.L.; Guedes da Silva, F.C. Addition reactions of primary and secondary aliphatic amines to the benzonitrile ligands in cis- and trans-[PtCl2(NCPh)2] complexes. X-ray structure of the amidine complex trans-[PtCl2{Z-N(H)=C(NHBut)Ph}2]. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2002, 334, 437–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Maresca, L.; Natile, G.; Intini, F.P.; Gasparrini, F.; Tiripiccbio, A.; Tiripicchio-Camellinil, M. Nucleophilic attack of amine and hydroxide to platinum dibenzonitrile dichloride. Crystal structure of [Pt(NH=CPhN-t-BuCH2CH2NH-t- Bu)Cl(NHCO(Ph)] (2) and cis-[Pt(NH=CPhN-t-BuCH2CH2NH-t-Bu)Cl2(NCPh)] (3). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 1180–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Michelin, R.A.; Betani, R.; Mozzon, M.; Sassi, A.; Benetollo, F.; Bombieri, G.; Pombeiro, A.J.L. cis-Addition of dimethylamine to the coordinated nitriles of cis- and trans-[PtCl2(NCMe)2]. X-ray structure of the amidine complex cis- [PtCl2{E-N(H)=C(NMe2)Me}2]·CH2Cl2]. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2001, 4, 275–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Bacchi, A.; Belli Dell’ Amico, D.; Calderazzo, F.; Labella, L.; Pelizzi, G.; Marchetti, F.; Samaritani, S. Reactions of the homoleptic acetonitrile complexes of palladium and platinum with diethylamine. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2010, 363, 2467–2473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Chin, C.S.; Chong, D.; Lee, B.; Jeong, H.; Won, G.; Do, Y.; Park, Y.J. Activation of acetonitrile in [Cp*Ir(η3- CH2CHCHPh)(NCMe)]+: Crystal structures of iridium-amidine, imino-ether, amido, and amide complexes. Organometallics 2000, 19, 638–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Podjed, N.; Modec, B.; Alcaide, M.; Lopez-Serrano, J. From cyclic amines and acetonitrile to amidine zinc(II) complexes. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 18200–18221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Richardson, T.; de Gala, S.; Crabtree, R.H.; Siegbahn, P.E.M. Unconventional hydrogen bonds: Intermolecular B-H···H-N interactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 12875–12876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Klooster, W.T.; Koetzle, T.F.; Siegbahn, P.E.M.; Richardson, T.B.; Crabtree, R.H. Study of the N-H···H-B dihydrogen bond including the crystal structure of BH3NH3 by neutron diffraction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 6337–6343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Chen, X.; Zhao, J.-C.; Shore, S.G. The roles of dihydrogen bonds in amine borane chemistry. Acc. Chem. Res. 2013, 46, 2666–2675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Huang, Z.; Lingam, H.K.; Chen, X.; Porter, S.; Du, A.; Woodard, P.M.; Shore, S.G.; Zhao, J.-C. Synthesis, structural analysis, and thermal decomposition studies of [(NH3)2BH2]B3H8. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 7460–7465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Tan, Y.; Gu, Q.; Kimpton, J.A.; Li, Q.; Chen, X.; Ouyang, L.; Zhu, M.; Sun, D.; Yu, X. A synergistic strategy established by the combination of two H-enriched B-N based hydrides towards superior dehydrogenation. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 10155–10165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Guan, R.; Wang, P.; Song, Y.; Staroverov, V.N. Pressure-induced polymorphic transformations of ethylenediamine bisborane. J. Phys. Chem. C 2021, 125, 18614–18622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Orlova, A.M.; Mustyatsa, V.N.; Goeva, L.V.; Katser, S.B.; Solntsev, K.A.; Kuznetsov, N.T. Bipyridylammonium salts of closo-borate anions BnHn2- (n = 6, 10, and 12). Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 1996, 41, 1856–1862. [Google Scholar]
  97. Mebs, S.; Kalinowski, R.; Grabowsky, S.; Förster, D.; Kickbusch, R.; Justus, E.; Morgenroth, W.; Paulmann, C.; Luger, P.; Gabel, D.; et al. Charge transfer via the dative N-B bond and dihydrogen contacts. Experimental and theoretical electron density studies of four deltahedral boranes. J. Phys. Chem. A 2011, 115, 1385–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Avdeeva, V.V.; Vologzhanina, A.V.; Malinina, E.A.; Kuznetsov, N.T. Dihydrogen bonds in salts of boron cluster anions [BnHn]2- with protonated heterocyclic organic bases. Crystals 2019, 9, 330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Schulz, F.; Sumerin, V.; Heikkinen, S.; Pedersen, B.; Wang, C.; Atsumi, M.; Leskela, M.; Repo, T.; Pyykko, P.; Petry, W.; et al. Molecular hydrogen tweezers: Structure and mechanisms by neutron diffraction, NMR, and deuterium labeling studies in solid and solution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 20245–20257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Mo, Z.; Rit, A.; Campos, J.; Kolychev, E.L.; Aldridge, S. Catalytic B-N dehydrogenation using frustrated Lewis pairs: Evidence for a chain-growth coupling mechanism. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 3306–3309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Zhdanov, A.P.; Voinova, V.V.; Klyukin, I.N.; Kubasov, A.S.; Zhizhin, K.Y.; Kuznetsov, N.T. New synthesis method of N-monosubstituted ammonium-closo-decaborates. J. Cluster Sci. 2019, 30, 1327–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Armarego, W.L.F.; Chai, C.L.L. Purification of Laboratory Chemicals; Butterworth-Heinemann: Burlington, VT, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. APEX2 and SAINT; Bruker AXS Inc.: Madison, WI, USA, 2014.
  104. Sheldrick, G.M. Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL. Acta Crystallogr. 2015, C71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 26 06544 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Nucleophilic addition reactions of primary amines to the propionitrilium derivative of cobalt bis(dicarbollide).
Scheme 1. Nucleophilic addition reactions of primary amines to the propionitrilium derivative of cobalt bis(dicarbollide).
Molecules 26 06544 sch001
Molecules 26 06544 g001 550
Figure 1. (HH)gCOSY NMR spectrum of amidines 1 in acetone-d6. The ratio of 1a:1b is 1:1.3.
Figure 1. (HH)gCOSY NMR spectrum of amidines 1 in acetone-d6. The ratio of 1a:1b is 1:1.3.
Molecules 26 06544 g001
Molecules 26 06544 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Nucleophilic addition of secondary amines to the propionitrilium derivative of cobalt bis(dicarbollide).
Scheme 2. Nucleophilic addition of secondary amines to the propionitrilium derivative of cobalt bis(dicarbollide).
Molecules 26 06544 sch002
Molecules 26 06544 g002 550
Figure 2. (HH)NOESY NMR spectrum of amidine 8 in acetone-d6 with diagonal peak suppression.
Figure 2. (HH)NOESY NMR spectrum of amidine 8 in acetone-d6 with diagonal peak suppression.
Molecules 26 06544 g002
Molecules 26 06544 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) The crystal molecular structures of E-[8-EtC(NMe2)=HN-3,3′-Co(1,2-C2B9H10)(1′,2′-C2B9H11)] (7); (b) E-[8-EtC(NEt2)=HN-3,3′-Co(1,2-C2B9H10)(1′,2′-C2B9H11)] (8) and (c) E-[8-EtC(NC5H10)=HN-3,3′-Co(1,2-C2B9H10)(1′,2′-C2B9H11)] (9).
Figure 3. (a) The crystal molecular structures of E-[8-EtC(NMe2)=HN-3,3′-Co(1,2-C2B9H10)(1′,2′-C2B9H11)] (7); (b) E-[8-EtC(NEt2)=HN-3,3′-Co(1,2-C2B9H10)(1′,2′-C2B9H11)] (8) and (c) E-[8-EtC(NC5H10)=HN-3,3′-Co(1,2-C2B9H10)(1′,2′-C2B9H11)] (9).
Molecules 26 06544 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bogdanova, E.V.; Stogniy, M.Y.; Suponitsky, K.Y.; Sivaev, I.B.; Bregadze, V.I. Synthesis of Boronated Amidines by Addition of Amines to Nitrilium Derivative of Cobalt Bis(Dicarbollide). Molecules 2021, 26, 6544. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26216544

AMA Style

Bogdanova EV, Stogniy MY, Suponitsky KY, Sivaev IB, Bregadze VI. Synthesis of Boronated Amidines by Addition of Amines to Nitrilium Derivative of Cobalt Bis(Dicarbollide). Molecules. 2021; 26(21):6544. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26216544

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bogdanova, Ekaterina V., Marina Yu. Stogniy, Kyrill Yu. Suponitsky, Igor B. Sivaev, and Vladimir I. Bregadze. 2021. "Synthesis of Boronated Amidines by Addition of Amines to Nitrilium Derivative of Cobalt Bis(Dicarbollide)" Molecules 26, no. 21: 6544. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26216544

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop