Next Article in Journal
Non-Volatile Transistor Memory with a Polypeptide Dielectric
Next Article in Special Issue
Bee Products in Dermatology and Skin Care
Previous Article in Journal
Abnormal Cannabidiol Affects Production of Pro-Inflammatory Mediators and Astrocyte Wound Closure in Primary Astrocytic-Microglial Cocultures
Previous Article in Special Issue
Bioadhesive Polymeric Films Based on Red Onion Skins Extract for Wound Treatment: An Innovative and Eco-Friendly Formulation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Fragaria Genus: Chemical Composition and Biological Activities

by
Radu Claudiu Fierascu
1,2,
Georgeta Temocico
1,*,
Irina Fierascu
1,2,*,
Alina Ortan
1 and
Narcisa Elena Babeanu
1
1
University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest, 59 Mărăști Blvd., 011464 Bucharest, Romania
2
Emerging Nanotechnologies Group, National Institute for Research & Development in Chemistry and Petrochemistry—ICECHIM Bucharest, 202 Spl. Independentei, 060021 Bucharest, Romania
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2020, 25(3), 498; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25030498
Submission received: 23 December 2019 / Revised: 19 January 2020 / Accepted: 22 January 2020 / Published: 23 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Extracts: Biological and Pharmacological Activity)

Abstract

:
The strawberries represent in our days one of the main fresh fruits consumed globally, inevitably leading to large amounts of by-products and wastes. Usually appreciated because of their specific flavor, the strawberries also possess biological properties, including antioxidant, antimicrobial, or anti-inflammatory effects. In spite of the wide spread of the Fragaria genus, few species represent the subject of the last decade scientific research. The main components identified in the Fragaria species are presented, as well as several biological properties, as emerging from the scientific papers published in the last decade.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The production of different fruits all around the world exceeds millions of tons, depending on geographical zones, consumption, and growing traditions, inevitably leading to large amounts of by-products and wastes. Fragaria genus (Rosaceae), commonly known as strawberry, represents one of the most important food plants all over the world, with a double global production compared with all other fruit berries combined [1]. Their widespread use, primarily because of their flavor, can also lead to considerable benefits to human health. Among other characteristics, nonvisual properties like taste, nutritional values, or aroma make these fruits to be in the top of consumer preferences [2].
Known and consumed for thousands of years, Fragaria species are encountered throughout the northern hemisphere, as well as in some areas of South America [1]. Several authors present the historical consumption of strawberries in pre-Columbian sites, Picunche and Mapuche people (Chile), Romans or ancient China. [1,3,4,5] The exact number of accepted species of the genus remains a subject of debate, ranging from 22 [6] to 16 [7]. In addition, there are many hybrids and cultivars representing ploidy levels ranging from diploid (2n = 2x = 14) to decaploid (2n = 10x = 70), influencing the size of the fruits. Most of the research regarding the genus can be traced to the extraordinary work of Antoine Nicolas Duchesne, that offered botanical description, details on the history, cultivation, sex, and polyploidy of different species [5]. Generally speaking, all Fragaria species share some common characteristics: are low-growing perennials, with usually evergreen and trifoliolate leaves, insect-pollinated, with white actinomorphic flowers (usually 5-petalled). The main difference between species is represented by the animal-dispersed accessory aggregate fruits, in terms of color, shape, and achene (the 1-seeded simple fruits) and calyx positions at maturity. From the different composition and other characteristics of those fruits, also arise the potential commercial value of the species. Many cultivars are perennials that vary in their photoperiod needs, leading to varying harvesting times (June-bearers, ever-bearers, day-neutral) [8].
Among the 247 varieties known and listed, only few present commercial interest: Fragaria x ananassa Duchesne (octoploid hybrid-containing 56 chromosomes, known as garden strawberry, native to northern America, cultivated all over the world), and, to a lesser extent, Fragaria vesca L. (diploid species, known as wild strawberry, native to Northern hemisphere) and Fragaria chiloensis (L.) Mill. (octoploid species, known as Chilean strawberry, native to northern, pacific and southern America) [1].
As previously mentioned, the strawberries represent one of the most important fruit plants. Their production reached 9.22 million tones (world level) in 2017, the major producers being China (40.3% of total world production), United States (15.7%), Mexico (7.14%), Egypt (4.42%), Turkey (4.34%), Spain (3.9%), Republic of Korea (2.28%), Poland, Russian Federation, Morocco, Japan, Germany, United Kingdom, and Italy (between 1 and 2%) [9]. This mass-production invariably leads to large amounts of wastes, that can be further exploited in multiple areas, including medicine, cosmetics, and food industry [10]. The wastes are generated throughout the growth cycle (maturation, multiplication, and expansion), while the large-scale methods of cultivation (e.g., in fields, plastic tunnels., etc.) leads to large amounts of wastes from leaves, stolons, fruits, etc.
The present review paper aims to present the identified components in different species of the Fragaria genus, as well as their potential biological activities, as emerging from the scientific papers published in the past decade. The selection of the articles to be included in the present review was performed using the well-known data-bases (Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and PubMed), using specific keywords (“composition”, “therapeutic”, “cytotoxic”, “anti*”—returning results for “antimicrobial”, “antifungal”, “anti-inflammatory”, etc.). The validation of the articles was performed manually (by reading the entire article) and in the present review were inserted only articles with significant contribution to the field of research.

2. Composition of Fragaria L. Genus

Giampieri et al. [11] reviewed the composition of the strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa), while Morales-Quintana and Ramos [12] reviewed the composition and potential applications of the Chilean strawberry (Fragaria chiloensis (L.) Mill.), while the functional properties of the berries, in general, and of the strawberries, in particular, were reviewed by Jimenez-Garcia et al. [13]. As resulting from various literature studies [11,12,13,14,15], the general composition of the strawberries (in terms of major components) can be summarized in Table 1 (with a general image provided in Figure 1).
The presented composition varies with a series of factors, including the value of the cultivar, seasonal variation, and the degree of fruit ripeness. In the reviewed time period, several studies presented the evaluation of species belonging to Fragaria genus. Their main findings are presented in Table 2, while relevant studies are presented in the following paragraphs.
As the major bioactive constituents of Fragaria fruits are represented by anthocyanins, most of the literature studies are focused on their identification/quantification. Cerezo et al. [17] identified multiple anthocyanins and other phenolic compounds present in Fragaria x ananassa (Camarosa variety) puree, among which three of them (delphinidin-3-glucoside, peonidin-3-glucoside, cyanidin-3-galactoside) were proposed for the first time in the literature. A correlation between the cultivation system (classic/organic) and the composition of the strawberries was established by Crecente-Campo et al. [18]. The authors observed higher values of the identified anthocyanins and ascorbic acid (accompanied by a darker, redder color and a superior nutritional value) in the case of organic cultivated strawberries. The differences in terms of volatile esters composition between wild and cultivated strawberries were presented by Dong et al. [19]. The authors suggested that the composition in volatile esters (dominated in the case of F. vesca by acetate esters, and by ethyl hexanoate, in the case of Fragaria x ananassa) is the key factor in the differences in terms of aroma patterns between the two species. Yang et al. [20] evaluated the phenolic compounds present in Fragaria x ananassa Duch. cv. Falandi fruits, identifying flavone glucuronides, lignan glycosides, and other compounds. The authors also isolated, for the first time in the literature, three phenolic glucosides (2,3′′-epoxy-4-(butan-2-one-3-yl)-5,7,40-trihydroxy flavane 3-glucoside, kaempferol 3-(6-butylglucuronide), benzyl 2-glucosyl-6-rhamnosylbenzoate), offering their spectroscopic characteristics in support of the suggested structures. Roy et al. [21] studied comparatively the polyphenolic composition of Fragaria x ananassa and Fragaria vesca mutant fruits (white-colored) with regular fruits. Their study revealed the presence of 22 compounds belonging to different groups, as anthocyanins (cyanidin-3-glucoside, pelargonidin-3-glucoside, peonidin-3-glucoside, pelargonidin malonyl-glucoside, peonidin-malonyl-glucoside, and cyanidin-malonyl-glucoside) flavonols (quercetin, quercetin-3-glucoside, kaempferol-3-glucoside, kaempferol-acetyl glucoside, and kaempferol-coumaroyl hexoside), flavan-3-ols (proanthocyanidin dimers, catechin and epicatechin), hydroxycinnamic acids (caffeic acid, chlorogenic acid, and p-coumaroyl hexose), and ellagic acid-derived compounds (ellagic acid deoxyhexoside, methyl ellagic acid pentoside, and dimethyl ellagic acid pentoside). The major difference recorded between the white and red fruits (for both species) was the anthocyanins content. The white fruits had much lower total anthocyanin levels (0.11–0.35 for F. vesca and 0.89 mg/100 g fresh fruits for Fragaria x ananassa), compared with the red fruits (8.36, respectively 15.20 mg/100 g fresh fruits). Another major difference was recorded in terms of free ellagic acid and its derivatives (higher for F. vesca white fruits compared with the red fruits). Although the study was focused on the identification of specific mutations in different white-fruited genotypes, the article offers a very good insight on the variation of the phenolic composition, both with species and genotype. This could be further useful for the selection of the phenotype for separation of bioactive compounds for targeted applications. Two different compounds (a protease enzyme with molecular weight 65.8 kDa, stable at high temperatures and over a wide pH range, with specificity toward hemoglobin, respectively a cysteine protease inhibitor cystatin FchCYS1) were isolated in 2018 from Fragaria x ananassa [22], respectively Fragaria chiloensis [23], while a new ellagitannin (a galloylated derivative of agrimoniin, with molecular weight 2038) named fragariin A was isolated in 2019 by Karlińska et al. from strawberry fruits (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) [24]. The distribution of the active compounds found in Fragaria x ananassa Duch. fruits was elucidated in 2019 by Nizioł et al. [25], by applying mass spectrometry imaging with 109Ag nanoparticle enhanced target. The authors studied thirty-two known metabolites and reached the conclusion that γ-aminobutyric acid, quinic acid, vitamin C, catechin, xylose, 4-hydroxy-2,5-dimethyl-3(2H)-furanone and nonanal are located under the fruit’s skin, aldehydes (hexanal, benzaldehyde) and ketones (1-penten-3-one, geranylacetone) are distributed throughout the fruits (in the inner core and in the cortex layer), while asparagine, lysine, gambriin C, oxalic acid and 2-methylbutanoic acid are found on/around the surface of the achenes. The authors suggested that their distribution is strongly connected with both the sites of their biosynthesis and to their function.
The composition of the fruits, although representing a characteristic of each species, can be influenced by a number of factors (as presented in Table 2), including the characteristics of the cultivar [21,27,29,31,34,39,43,44,45,46], cultivation factors, and the environmental conditions [18,27,37,38,47,48,49,50], ripening stage [28,29,35,51], or by biotechnological approaches [52,53,54]. For example, the variation in composition of a large number of Fragaria × ananassa Duch. cultivars was presented in 2019 by Nowicka et al. [43]. The authors identified as main components in the strawberry fruits the anthocyanins (pelargonidin-3-O-β-glucoside, cyanidin-3-O-β-glucoside, pelargonidin-3-O-rutinoside, cyaniding-3-O-(6″malonyl)glucoside, pelargonidin-3-O-(6″malonyl)glucoside)), flavonoids (derivatives of quercetin, kaempferol and isorhamnetin), cinnamic acid derivatives (isomers of 1-O-p-coumaroylhexose, 1-O-feruloylhexose, 1-O-p-coumaroyl-β-glucose, 1-O-trans-cinnamoyl-β-glucose), tannins and related compounds (gallotannins, glycosides of ellagic acid and methylellagic acid, free ellagic acid, flavan-3-ol derivatives), and triterpenoids (methyl or hydroxyl derivatives of tormentic or dihydrotormentic acid). More importantly, using the variation of the analyzed compounds allowed the authors to propose some of the cultivars for future studies and biomedical uses. Another interesting study was presented in 2011 by Pineli et al. who studied the compositional differences between two Fragaria x ananassa cultivars (Osogrande and Camino Real) in different ripening stages. Interestingly, the authors observed higher amounts of total phenolics, total ellagic acid, and vitamin C in the pink strawberries (3/4 ripe, as defined by the authors), compared with the green and fully ripe ones [28]. The differences recorded between the cited literature studies can be thus explained by the influence of those factors, as well as by the extraction procedure followed (which also have a strong influence on the final composition of the extracts), as demonstrated by Pawlaczyk-Graja et al. on the structure of polyphenolic-polysaccharide conjugates obtained from the leaves of Fragaria vesca using different classical and modern methods [55].
As the primary economic importance of the Fragaria genus is related to their fruits, it must be stated that, besides the previously presented factors, their composition (and finally, their health benefits) is correlated with the applied processing methods. The most encountered forms of products (besides fresh fruits) are represented by the dried fruits and puree. Méndez-Lagunas et al. [56] studied the influence of the thermal drying on the anthocyanins and total phenolic content of Fragaria × ananassa Duch. fruits. The study revealed a 26% loss of anthocyanins content when drying at 50 °C, respectively a 45% loss upon drying at 60 °C. The total phenolic content was even more seriously affected by the thermal process, with 60.9% loss associated with 50 °C, and 78.1% for the 60 °C treatment, respectively. Thus, the importance of fresh fruits consumption and when not possible, application of appropriate drying methods was emphasized; the authors propose the 50 °C treatment as suitable for preserving the bioactive compounds found in the strawberries (particularly anthocyanins). Álvarez-Fernández et al. [57] evaluated the variation in non-anthocyanin phenolic composition (hydrolyzed tannins, flavanols and condensed tannins, ellagic acid and derivatives, hydroxycinnamic acids, flavonol glycosides and stilbenes) of strawberry puree in different production stages. If mashing process affected the content of some phenolics (gallic acid, monogalloylglucoside and ellagic acid), the pasteurization process induced the decrease of all the compounds’ concentration. However, the non-anthocyanin phenolic profile was not significantly affected, suggesting that the strawberry puree represents a good source of phenolic compounds.
The strawberry “seeds” (achenes) were proven to be a valuable source of unsaturated fatty acids. Thus, several studies revealed that commercially available achenes oil contained high amounts of linoleic and α-linoleic acids (over 70%), with a total content of over 90% unsaturated fatty acids (also including oleic and traces of palmitoleic acid), while the saturated fatty acids were mainly represented by palmitic and stearic acids [58,59]. In the same time, the seeds could also be considered a source of dietary fibers, proteins, polyphenols (mainly ellagitannins), and vitamins [60]. Figure 1 summarizes the main classes of constituents found in Fragaria genus.

3. Biological Activities of Fragaria Genus

3.1. Antioxidant Properties

Traditionally consumed in the form of fruits (as previously presented), Fragaria species have also found application in traditional medicine. For example, Fragaria vesca leaves and fruits were traditionally used for the treatment of external rashes, as well as internally, as blood purification and roborontarium, for the treatment of diarrhea [61], as macerate for renal stones, or as tea (together with other medicinal plants) for treating stomach inflammations, sedation, or regulation of digestion [62]. The following paragraphs presents the main biological properties of different Fragaria species, as emerging from the literature data published in the past decade. Particularly, the anthocyanins family represent the subject of several review papers published in the last years, dealing with their bioavailability and potential health benefits [63,64,65]. The following chapters includes only the studies regarding the biological activity of compounds or extracts obtained from Fragaria species (not studies presenting the activity of compounds that are found in those plants).
The major classes of compounds found in the Fragaria species (anthocyanins and non-anthocyanin phenolic compounds) are known for their antioxidant properties [65,66]. As can be expected, the vast majority of the literature presenting the biological activities of species belonging to Fragaria genus present their antioxidant activity. However, the studies that will be presented should be carefully considered, as many are performed using assays predisposed to positive results in the presence of oxygenated functions on aromatic rings (thus being considered more “class-related” than as specific molecular targeting) [67]. Thus, those studies, although useful as screening tools, should be confirmed by more specific assays, such as in vivo or cell-based models [66,67].
Pineli et al. [28] performed a study on two Fragaria × ananassa Duch. cultivars (Osogrande and Camino Real), regarding the correlation between composition and the antioxidant activity (established using 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical-scavenging activity—DPPH and ferric reducing antioxidant power—FRAP assays) of acetone extracts obtained from fruits at different ripening stages. Very interestingly, although, as expected, the anthocyanins levels were higher in the red fruits (full ripe), the best antioxidant activities, for both cultivars and both assays were obtained for the pink fruits. The only exception is represented by the DPPH assay results for Osogrande cultivar (for which the best results were obtained for the red fruits); however, the differences between the results of the DPPH assay for the cultivar at the three ripening stages were not statistically significant. The differences between the results can be explained by the different mechanisms of the assays (as previously described by our group) [66]. A much better correlation was observed by the authors with the total phenolic and vitamin C content. Finally, the Osogrande cultivar presented superior antioxidant properties (associated with higher levels of the total phenolic and total ellagic acid content, especially in pink and red fruits). Zhu et al. [35] evaluated the influence of the solvent used for room-temperature extraction (water/ethanol) and of the extracted Fragaria × ananassa var. Amaou parts (red fruit, green fruit, red calyx, green calyx, flower, leaf, stolon, stolon leaf, stem, crown, and root) on the antioxidant properties of the extract. Their conclusion was that the ethanol was the solvent of choice (because of different polarities of the phenolic compounds found in the plant) and, among the plant parts, best results (presented as Trolox equivalents—TE per gram or extract and per 100 g of plant fresh weight—FW) were obtained for flower extracts (1460.1 μmol TE/g extract), respectively for crown (6212.3 μmol TE/100g FW), when reported to a fresh weight basis. Stolon leaves (1456.7 μmol TE/g extract, respectively 5244.2 μmol TE/100g FW) also exhibited a very good antioxidant activity.
Individual compounds (including phenolic glucosides, flavone glucuronides, and lignan glycosides) were isolated from the Fragaria x ananassa Duch. cv. Falandi fruits by Yang et al. [20] and tested for antioxidant properties. The best results were obtained for flavone glucuronides (in the ABTS and DPPH assays), and a lignan glycoside (in the FRAP assay), respectively. Considering the results obtained for the positive control used in the antioxidant assays (ascorbic acid), the authors suggested that the investigated phenolic compounds play an important role in the overall antioxidant property of the plant. Contrary to other studies, Chaves et al. [39] demonstrated a correlation between the total anthocyanin content and the antioxidant potential of strawberry fruits, in a study over seven cultivars. The antioxidant potential of plants, as it results from literature studies, seems to be correlated with total anthocyanins and not with total phenolic content.
In 2019, Nowicka et al. [43] published a study regarding the variation in composition and antioxidant properties of 90 cultivars of Fragaria × ananassa Duch. fruits over two years of production. The results (average values presented in Table 3) revealed not only that some cultivars can be considered as having superior antioxidant properties (Roxana, Gigaline, Selvik, Thuriga ISK, Eratina, Siria, Dagol, Plarionfre, Grenadier, and Kimberly), but also, considering the phytochemical profile, that the main compounds responsible for the activity are the tannins, especially ellagitannins and procyanidins.
As previously stated, because of the increasing request, strawberries are often commercialized as processed products. The effect of fruit drying on the antioxidant potential of the Fragaria × ananassa Duch., Diamante var. fruits was presented by Méndez-Lagunas et al. [56]. The antioxidant assay performed on the processed fruits (DPPH) revealed 74.7% loss of antioxidant activity for the thermal treatment at 50 °C, while the 60 °C treatment led to a 66.2% loss of the activity. The results suggested that, beyond temperature, heat treatment time has a stronger effect on the antioxidant activity (as at higher temperature, shorter periods are necessary). Similar, several researches were performed regarding the changes of antioxidant activity (determined using ORAC and DPPH assays) during different stages of puree production [57]. Although slight reduction of the antioxidant properties was recorded (statistically significant only for the pasteurization step), the authors recommended the strawberry puree as an excellent source of antioxidants. The same group [68] observed no effect of the gluconic fermentation of strawberry puree (applied for the production of beverages) on the antioxidant activity (determined using the DPPH assay); the authors even reported an increase of the antioxidant potential after the pasteurization step, which was correlated with an increase in the gallic acid and hydroxycinnamic derivatives content. The results would suggest that the gluconic fermentation could maintain the antioxidant potential of the fresh products upon processing.
The antioxidant potential of strawberries could rapidly find industrial applications, as was the case for other plant-derived antioxidants [69,70] in, for example, meat industry, as recently reviewed by Lorenzo et al. [71], for increasing the shelf-life of different products (as sausages or raw, cooked, and cooked-chilled porcine patties).
Table 3 summarizes the main findings regarding the antioxidant potential of Fragaria species, as well as the responsible classes of compounds (as presented by the authors).
As a general remark, it can be observed that most authors assign the antioxidant potential to the total phenolic content in general, and in particular to some classes of compounds, such as anthocyanins, flavan-3-ols or tannins. Considering the individual species, Fragaria x ananassa fruits presented antioxidant properties in the DPPH assay (the assays with the widest application) between 76.73–100 mg/mL (IC50) for various cultivars (the best results being obtained for the Camarosa cultivar) [39] or between 300 and 1300 μmol trolox/100 g fresh weight, for a larger survey (comprising 90 cultivars) [43]. Also, regarding the differences between the antioxidant potential of different plant parts, for F. chiloensis methanolic extracts the best activity was observed for fruits [26], while for Fragaria × ananassa for the crown ethanolic extract (6213.3 μmol trolox/100 g fresh weight). Fragaria vesca was mainly evaluated in terms of leaves, roots, or vegetative parts antioxidant activity, with antioxidant potential ranging from 13.46 mg/L to approx. 140 mg/L (IC50), strongly dependent on the source of vegetal material and applied extraction technique [72,73].

3.2. Anti-Inflammatory Properties

As previously stated, one of the traditional uses of Fragaria is as an anti-inflammatory agent [61,62]. Most of the authors assign the anti-inflammatory properties to the presence of anthocyanins (the most representative being pelargonidin and cyanidin derivates) [75], molecules with known anti-inflammatory potential [76,77], demonstrated both in vitro and in vivo [78,79]. Similar to the other biomedical potential, the anti-inflammatory action is also correlated with the composition of different Fragaria species. The traditional use of F. vesca as an anti-inflammatory agent was supported by the study of Liberal et al. [80]. The authors observed the decrease of a relevant mediator of the inflammatory response (nitric oxide) produced by macrophages, cultured in the presence of a NO-production inducing bacterial endotoxin (LPS). The ethanolic extract obtained from Fragaria vesca leaves, used at non-cytotoxic concentrations (80 and 160 mg/L), induced a 31%, and 40% inhibition, respectively. The authors assigned the NO decrease to a direct scavenging effect (as demonstrated by a 23% inhibition of the nitrite content in the culture media, correlated with the absence of a significant effect when quantifying the inducible nitric oxide synthase—iNOS and the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-1β). The authors also observed a statistically insignificant increase in the phosphorylated IκBα (nuclear factor of kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer in B-cells inhibitor, alpha) content, suggesting either an increase of its expression or a decrease in its degradation. More than that, the authors observed an increased conversion of the microtubule-associated protein light chain LC3-I to LC3-II (a marker of autophagy), suggesting further anti-cancer properties. Methanolic extracts of Fragaria x ananassa, var. Alba fruits were also confirmed by Gasparrini et al. [81] to lower the intracellular levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS), decrease apoptotic rate and improve antioxidant defenses and mitochondria functionality in E. Coli induced inflammation in human dermal fibroblast cells. Their results showed significant decrease of TNF-α (tumor necrosis factor alpha), IL-1β and IL-6 (interleukin 6) levels. The authors proposed as responsible mechanism the action on AMPK (5′ AMP-activated protein kinase) related pathways (increment in phosphorylated AMPK expression). Between the two presented studies there are several experimental design/inputs differences that can explain the different obtained results (including the species and the solvent used for extraction). Thus, the higher levels of bioactive molecules in the Fragaria x ananassa fruits (compared with the F. vesca leaves, as previously presented) can explain the differences observed by the authors in terms of anti-inflammatory action. Similar observations were made by Molinett et al. [82] who proved the anti-inflammatory and hepatoprotective effect of aqueous F. chiloensis fruits extracts on LPS-inducted liver injury on rats. The anti-inflammatory effect of the Fragaria x ananassa var. Camarosa fruits was also in vivo evaluated on female mice by Duarte et al. [83], who assigned the activity to the presence of anthocyanins. Moreover, the authors performed in vitro experiments using pelargonidin-3-O-glucoside (the major anthocyanin in Fragaria) in order to establish its molecular mechanism of action. Regarding the in vivo experiments the authors noticed the inhibition of the carrageenan-induced leukocyte influx to the pleural cavity upon crude extract treatment, due to the reduction in neutrophil migration. The extract also induced a reduction of myeloperoxidase activity and reduced the exudate concentration in the pleural cavity and NO levels. The pure compound pelargonidin-3-O-glucoside produced similar results, inhibiting IkBα, also reducing the phosphorylation of p65 NF-kB (nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells) subunit. The authors proposed as mechanism of the anthocyanin the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways, leading to the decrease in NF-kB and activated protein 1 (AP-1) translocation. In 2019, Van de Velde et al. [84] supported the previously reported anti-inflammation properties of strawberry extracts, also proposing another possible application, by evaluating the wound-healing effects. The extract and polyphenolics/anthocyanins-enriched fractions influenced the skin fibroblast migration (45% of the migration registered for the positive control—fetal bovine serum, for the crude extract, 50% of the positive control for the anthocyanins enriched fraction at 1 mg/L, 30% of the positive control for the polyphenolics enriched fraction), suggesting that the wound-healing properties are strongly associated with the anthocyanins presence. The dietary use of strawberry achenes commercial oil has also been proven to reduce the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione peroxidase (cGPx) in rats (38.73, respectively 10.5 international units/gram of hemoglobin—U/g Hb, compared with the control group—67.33, and 22.9 U/g Hb, respectively), thus being qualified as a potential nutraceutical reducing oxidative stress [58].

3.3. Other Potential Applications

The anti-microbial properties were evaluated within the reviewed time period, especially for F. vesca. Hydromethanolic extracts obtained from leaves and roots of Fragaria vesca L. were evaluated by Gomes et al. [85] as antimicrobial agents a series of S. aureus strains. The results suggested a weak antimicrobial potential of the extracts (5–9 mm inhibition halos in the qualitative assays), which did not qualify the extracts for quantitative determinations. Superior results in terms of antimicrobial properties were obtained by Cardoso et al. [86]. Using hydroalcoholic extracts, the authors observed good antimicrobial properties of the crude extract against a series of Helicobacter pylori isolates (inhibition zones ≥ 15 mm) at a 25 mg/mL concentration. The ellagitannin-enriched fraction was efficient against all isolates at lower concentrations (7.5 mg/mL), which led the authors to assume that the ellagitannins were the main class of compounds responsible for the anti-microbial properties. As the H. pylori represents a pathogen involved in several gastric pathologies (including gastritis, gastroduodenal ulcer disease, gastric adenocarcinoma and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma), the authors proposed the wild strawberry extract as a potential candidate for human health applications.
The anti-allergenic potential of several compounds (linocinnamarin, 1-O-trans-cinnamoyl-b-d-glucopyranose, p-coumaric acid, cinnamic acid, chrysin, kaempferol, catechin, and trans-tiliroside) isolated from Fragaria x ananassa var. Minomusume fruits were evaluated by Ninomiya et al. [87], through the determination of their inhibitory effects on antigen-stimulated degranulation in rat basophilic leukemia RBL-2H3 cells. Among the studied compounds, linocinnamarin (95% inhibition of control at 100 μM) and cinnamic acid (approx. 80% of control at 100 μM) were the most efficient in degranulation suppression (through direct inactivation of spleen tyrosine kinase), being proposed as promising tools for alleviating symptoms of type I allergy.
The commercially-available strawberry freeze-dried powder was demonstrated by Abdulazeez [88] to reverse alloxan-induced diabetes (results not presented in Table 4 as authors used commercial powder product); in a similar study, Yang et al. [12] evaluated the potential anti-diabetic application of new and known compounds isolated from strawberry fruits (as presented in Section 2) by determining the α-glucosidase inhibitory activity. The best results were obtained for cupressoside A (IC50 = 25.39 μM), kaempferol 3-(6-methylglucuronide) (IC50 = 65.22 μM), and 2-p-hydroxybenzoyl-2,4,6-tri hydroxyphenylacetate (IC50 = 97.81 μM), with very good results obtained for a newly proposed structure (kaempferol 3-(6-butylglucuronide)-IC50 = 107.52 μM); results superior to the positive control (acarbose-IC50 = 619.94 μM) were also obtained for five other compounds.
Another interesting study is represented by the one performed by Zhu et al. [35]. Besides the phytochemical and anti-oxidant studies (previously presented), the authors also evaluated the anti-obesity, anti-allergy, and skin-lightening effects of extracts obtained from different parts of strawberry in different ripening stages. The extracts exhibited anti-obesity activity (the water extract of unripe fruit and the ethanol extracts of the stem, stolon leaf, and crown ripe fruits exhibiting anti-lipase activity, as well as inhibitory effect on adipocyte differentiation), anti-allergy function (the ethanol extracts of flower, stolon leaf and red calyx showing strong suppression effect on the release of β-hexosaminidase), and skin-lightening potential (ethanol extracts of ripe fruits, unripe fruit and the crown exhibiting melanogenesis inhibitory action, correlated with the tyrosinase-inhibitory activities).
The cytotoxic potential of the Fragaria species was demonstrated in several studies. Somasagara et al. [89] evaluated the potential application of methanolic strawberry extract in leukemia (CEM) and breast cancer (T47D) cell lines ex vivo, as well as its therapeutic and chemopreventive potential in vivo. The MTT, trypan blue and LDH assays revealed the cytotoxicity of the extract on cancer cells, in a concentration-dependent manner, while the in vivo studies revealed the anti-proliferative action on tumor cells. Forni et al. [90] investigated the antiproliferative and differentiation potential of an anthocyanin-rich strawberry fruit extract on B16-F10 murine melanoma cells. Their results showed the reduction of cell proliferation (30% after 48 h), accompanied by the lowering of the intracellular levels of polyamines (63.8% decrease of spermidine, 52.9% decrease of spermine, after 72 h), and the enhancement of tissue transglutaminase (172% increase after 48 h). The used extract also down-regulated p53 and p21 expression (47.2%, and 32.6%, respectively). Liberal et al. [33] presented the cytotoxic potential of an ellagitannin-enriched fraction from Fragaria vesca leaves on human hepatic carcinoma cell line (HepG2). Their results showed that the crude extract and, more pronounced, the ellagitannin-enriched fraction, were able to interfere with cell cycle distribution. The ellagitannin-enriched fraction also induced necrosis and apoptosis in the threated cells, decreased chymotrypsin-like activity of the 26S proteasome, impaired autophagic flux, promoted the accumulation of ubiquitinated proteins, and decreased the expression of several proteasome subunits. Lucioli et al. [91] evaluated the influence of hydroalcoholic extracts (methanol, ethanol, isopropanol) from in vitro cell suspension on the proliferation of several cancer cells (neuroblastoma, colon, and cervix carcinoma cell lines). The extracts induced a statistically significant reduction of cell growth but did not affect the human fibroblasts from healthy donors. The chemoprotective action of strawberries was also studied by Casto et al. [92] (results not presented in Table 4 as authors used commercial strawberry powder). The chemoprotective role of strawberries on colorectal cancer in inflammatory bowel disease was recently reviewed by Chen et al. [93], who proposed a mechanism of action involving the suppression of cytokines release, decrease of oxidative stress, reduction of genomic instability, and inhibition of NFκB (nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells) and related signalling pathways. Table 4 summarizes the main biological activities (except anti-oxidant properties, presented in Table 3), as emerging from the literature survey, considering the main constituents of the tested extracts.

4. Current Limitations and Future Perspectives

In spite of the wide spread of the Fragaria genus, few species represent the subject of the last decade scientific research, with many works focused on the composition and bioactivities of wild and garden species. Although those species, with certain commercial value, represent a very valuable source of different classes of polyphenols (including proanthocyanidins, anthocyanins, ellagitannins, flavonoids, phenylpropanoids, stilbenes, phenol glycosides, and dihydrochalcones) and thus possessing important nutritional value [96], the researchers should also focus on less-studied species, native to different parts of the world. This could represent an important opportunity for future studies. Also, the evaluation of other possible application (such as cosmetic products) could represent an interesting area of research. As an example, Sikora et al. [59] used supercritical CO2 extraction for obtaining strawberry seeds (achenes) oil and applied it (in varying concentration from 0.5–2%) for the development of shower/bath cosmetics with good skin-moisturizing properties, without influencing the stability of the products.
A drawback that limits the potential beneficial effects of the strawberries’ consumption is represented by their processing. As previously mentioned, the thermal treatment reduces both the bioactive compounds and their biological activities. In this area, new protective coatings obtained using nanotechnological approaches were proposed for increasing their shelf-lives [97], or as post-harvest treatments, alternatives to the classical thermal treatments currently applied [98,99].
As emerging from the literature study, most of the research is performed via classical extraction methods in order to align with traditional uses of the species (infusion, decoction), and only few are including modern extraction and separation techniques (such as countercurrent chromatography). In this area, would be beneficial to evaluate the use of modern methods of extraction/separation of biological active compounds [100].
The rich anthocyanin content of the genus seems to offer promising compounds for very important applications, such as anti-cancer or chemoprotective agents. Another surprising aspect emerging from the reviewed works is the relatively few studies concerning the potential of Fragaria species towards anti-microbial applications. Although the literature abounds in examples regarding the anti-microbial potential of different plants extracts, it appears that the Fragaria could still offer some surprising results in this domain (considering its rich composition). Also, the application of Fragaria extracts in other areas, such as nanotechnology, is only “surface-scratched” at this moment. For example, Demirbas et al. [101] evaluated anthocyanins-rich berry extracts (including strawberry) for the phytosynthesis of silver nanoparticles and evaluated their antioxidant and anti-microbial potential. Although the results of the phytosynthesis process were promising (smallest dimensions, compared with the blackberry or raspberry extracts (35 nm), and with less aggregation, the antimicrobial effect was relatively poor (and only on B. cereus). The field of nanotechnology in general, and of nanoparticles phytosynthesis in special, represents a continuously increasing domain, so the extracts obtained from different species of the genus could demonstrate their usefulness in this area [102]. Other different nanoparticles could be obtained using the extracts, as well with tuned properties, using enrichment of the extracts [103]. Correlated with the anti-microbial properties, the potential toward nanotechnology could also lead to the development of other materials (such as polymeric encapsulated nanoparticles or even natural extracts) for different anti-microbial applications or for wider applications in increasing the quality of food products [104,105].
Finally, as a more general remark, the absence of standardized methods for the evaluation of different potential applications represents a major draw-back in the comparison of the results presented by different authors.

5. Conclusions

Fragaria represents a widely spread genus, with species encountered all over the world. The current study aimed to present the progress made in the last decade in the study of the composition and potential applications of the species belonging to the Fragaria genus. However, in spite the wide spread of its species, only a few represents the subject of current research. The literature study revealed that three species represent the major subject of research, respectively the wild, garden and beach strawberry.
Used in traditional medicine especially as an anti-inflammatory adjuvant, the scientific research supports this application, as well as several other potentially important uses, for example as a chemoprotective agent.
The composition of the genus, rich in polyphenolic compounds in general, and in anthocyanins in particular, suggests its possible application in multiple other areas. The relatively under-study of the genus (and the severe lack of literature for some of the species) offers in turn an opportunity for future research. At the same time, elucidation of the composition and properties of the commercially valuable products represents a very important aspect, as the characteristics of such a widely consumed product should be thoroughly elucidated.

Author Contributions

R.C.F., A.O., N.E.B., G.T., and I.F. contributed to data collection and analysis, and manuscript design. R.C.F., G.T., and I.F. prepared and revised the manuscript, and are the main authors of the study. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support obtained through the project SusMAPWaste, SMIS 104323, Contract No. 89/09.09.2016, from the Operational Program Competitiveness 2014-2020, project co-financed from the European Regional Development Fund.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Liston, A.; Cronn, R.; Ashman, T.L. Fragaria: A genus with deep historical roots and ripe for evolutionary and ecological insights. Am. J. Bot. 2014, 101, 1686–1699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Awad, M.A.; De Jager, A. Influences of air and controlled atmosphere storage on the concentration of potentially healthful phenolics in apples and other fruits. Postharv. Biol. Technol. 2003, 27, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pauketat, T.R.; Kelly, L.S.; Fritz, G.J.; Lopinot, N.H.; Elias, S.; Hargrave, E. The residues of feasting and public ritual at Early Cahokia. Amer. Antiq. 2002, 67, 257–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Finn, C.E.; Retamales, J.B.; Lobos, G.A.; Hancock, J.F. The Chilean strawberry (Fragaria chiloensis): Over 1000 years of domestication. HortScience 2013, 48, 418–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Duchesne, A.N. Histoire Naturelle des Fraisiers Contenant les Vues d’économie Réunies à la Botanique et Suivie de Remarques Particulières sur Plusieurs Points qui ont Rapport à l’Histoire Naturelle Générale; Didot le Jeune: Paris, France, 1766. [Google Scholar]
  6. Plants of the World Online: Fragaria L. Available online: http://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:30014957-2 (accessed on 3 January 2020).
  7. The Plant List: Fragaria. Available online: http://www.theplantlist.org/1.1/browse/A/Rosaceae/Fragaria/ (accessed on 3 January 2020).
  8. Petran, A.J. Performance and impact of strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa) season extension in the United States Upper Midwest using organic practices. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA, April 2016. [Google Scholar]
  9. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). 2017. Available online: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC (accessed on 3 January 2020).
  10. Sato, T.; Ikeya, Y.; Adachi, S.I.; Yagasaki, K.; Nihei, K.I.; Itoh, N. Extraction of strawberry leaves with supercritical carbon dioxide and entrainers: Antioxidant capacity, total phenolic content, and inhibitory effect on uric acid production of the extract. Food Bioprod. Process 2019, 117, 160–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Giampieri, F.; Tulipani, S.; Alvarez-Suarez, J.M.; Quiles, J.L.; Mezzetti, B.; Battino, M. The strawberry: Composition, nutritional quality, and impact on human health. Nutrition 2012, 28, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Morales-Quintana, L.; Ramos, P. Chilean strawberry (Fragaria chiloensis): An integrative and comprehensive review. Food Res. Int. 2019, 119, 769–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jimenez-Garcia, S.N.; Guevara-Gonzalez, R.G.; Miranda-Lopez, R.; Feregrino-Perez, A.A.; Torres-Pacheco, I.; Vazquez-Cruz, M.A. Functional properties and quality characteristics of bioactive compounds in berries: Biochemistry, biotechnology, and genomics. Food Res. Int. 2013, 54, 1195–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Nile, S.H.; Park, S.W. Edible berries: Bioactive components and their effect on human health. Nutrition 2014, 30, 134–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Vuong, Q.V.; Hirun, S.; Phillips, P.A.; Chuen, T.L.; Bowyer, M.C.; Goldsmith, C.D.; Scarlett, C.J. Fruit-derived phenolic compounds and pancreatic cancer: Perspectives from Australian native fruits. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2014, 152, 227–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Khan, N.; Syed, D.N.; Ahmad, N.; Mukhtar, H. Fisetin: A dietary antioxidant for health promotion. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2013, 2, 151–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Cerezo, A.B.; Cuevas, E.; Winterhalter, P.; Garcia-Parrilla, M.C.; Troncoso, A.M. Isolation, identification, and antioxidant activity of anthocyanin compounds in Camarosa strawberry. Food Chem. 2010, 123, 574–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Crecente-Campo, J.; Nunes-Damaceno, M.; Romero-Rodrıguez, M.A.; Vazquez-Oderiz, M.L. Color, anthocyanin pigment, ascorbic acid and total phenolic compound determination in organic versus conventional strawberries (Fragaria x ananassa Duch, cv Selva). J. Food Compos. Anal. 2012, 28, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Dong, J.; Zhang, Y.; Tang, X.; Jin, W.; Han, Z. Differences in volatile ester composition between Fragaria×ananassa and F. vesca and implications for strawberry aroma patterns. Sci. Horticult. 2013, 150, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yang, D.; Xie, H.; Jiang, Y.; Wei, X. Phenolics from strawberry cv. Falandi and their antioxidant and α-glucosidase inhibitory activities. Food Chem. 2016, 194, 857–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Roy, S.; Wu, B.; Liu, W.; Archbold, D.D. Comparative analyses of polyphenolic composition of Fragaria spp. Color mutants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 125, 255–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Alici, E.H.; Arabaci, G. A novel serine protease from strawberry (Fragaria ananassa): Purification and biochemical characterization. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 114, 1295–1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Aceituno-Valenzuela, U.; Covarrubias, M.P.; Aguayo, M.F.; Valenzuela-Riffo, F.; Espinoza, A.; Gaete-Eastman, C.; Herrera, R.; Handford, M.; Norambuena, L. Identification of a type II cystatin in Fragaria chiloensis: A proteinase inhibitor differentially regulated during achene development and in response to biotic stress-related stimuli. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 129, 158–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Karlińska, E.; Pecio, L.; Macierzyński, J.; Stochmal, A.; Kosmala, M. Structural elucidation of the ellagitannin with a molecular weight of 2038 isolated from strawberry fruit (Fragaria ananassa Duch.) and named fragariin A. Food Chem. 2019, 296, 109–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Nizioł, J.; Misiorek, M.; Ruman, T. Mass spectrometry imaging of low molecular weight metabolites in strawberry fruit (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) cv. Primoris with 109Ag nanoparticle enhanced target. Phytochemistry 2019, 159, 11–19. [Google Scholar]
  26. Simirgiotis, M.J.; Schmeda-Hirschmann, G. Determination of phenolic composition and antioxidant activity in fruits, rhizomes and leaves of the white strawberry (Fragaria chiloensis spp. Chiloensis form chiloensis) using HPLC-DAD–ESI-MS and free radical quenching techniques. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2010, 23, 545–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Singh, A.; Singh, B.K.; Deka, B.C.; Sanwal, S.K.; Patel, R.K.; Verma, M.R. The genetic variability, inheritance and inter-relationships of ascorbic acid, β-carotene, phenol and anthocyanin content in strawberry (Fragaria×ananassa Duch.). Sci. Horticult. 2011, 129, 86–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pineli, L.L.O.; Moretti, C.L.; dos Santos, M.S.; Campos, A.B.; Brasileiro, A.V.; Cordova, A.C.; Chiarello, M.D. Antioxidants and other chemical and physical characteristics of two strawberry cultivars at different ripeness stages. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2011, 24, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Aaby, K.; Mazur, S.; Nes, A.; Skrede, G. Phenolic compounds in strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) fruits: Composition in 27 cultivars and changes during ripening. Food Chem. 2012, 132, 86–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Mikulic-Petkovsek, M.; Slatnar, A.; Stampar, F.; Veberic, R. HPLC-MSn identification and quantification of flavonol glycosides in 28 wild and cultivated berry species. Food Chem. 2012, 135, 2138–2146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Sun, J.; Liu, X.; Yang, T.; Slovin, J.; Chen, P. Profiling polyphenols of two diploid strawberry (Fragaria vesca) inbred lines using UHPLC-HRMSn. Food Chem. 2014, 146, 289–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Veberic, R.; Slatnar, A.; Bizjak, J.; Stampar, F.; Mikulic-Petkovsek, M. Anthocyanin composition of different wild and cultivated berry species. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 60, 509–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liberal, J.; Costa, G.; Carmo, A.; Vitorino, R.; Marques, C.; Domingues, M.R.; Domingues, P.; Goncalves, A.C.; Alves, R.; Sarmento-Ribeiro, A.B.; et al. Chemical characterization and cytotoxic potential of an ellagitannin-enriched fraction from Fragaria vesca leaves. Arab. J. Chem. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Kim, S.K.; Kim, D.S.; Kim, D.Y.; Chun, C. Variation of bioactive compounds content of 14 oriental strawberry cultivars. Food Chem. 2015, 184, 196–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhu, Q.; Nakagawa, T.; Kishikawa, A.; Ohnuki, K.; Shimizu, K. In vitro bioactivities and phytochemical profile of various parts of the strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa var. Amaou). J. Funct. Food 2015, 13, 38–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Fernández-Lara, R.; Gordillo, B.; Rodríguez-Pulido, F.J.; González-Miret, M.L.; del Villar-Martínez, A.A.; Dávila-Ortiz, G.; Heredia, F.J. Assessment of the differences in the phenolic composition and color characteristics of new strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) cultivars by HPLC-MS and Imaging Tristimulus Colorimetry. Food Res. Int. 2015, 76, 645–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Guerrero-Chavez, G.; Scampicchio, M.; Andreotti, C. Influence of the site altitude on strawberry phenolic composition and quality. Sci. Horticult. 2015, 192, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. D’Urso, G.; Maldini, M.; Pintore, G.; d’Aquino, L.; Montoro, P.; Pizza, C. Characterisation of Fragaria vesca fruit from Italy following a metabolomics approach through integrated mass spectrometry techniques. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 74, 387–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chaves, V.C.; Calvete, E.; Reginatto, F.H. Quality properties and antioxidant activity of seven strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch) cultivars. Sci. Horticult. 2017, 225, 293–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Urrutia, M.; Rambla, J.L.; Alexiou, K.G.; Granell, A.; Monfort, A. Genetic analysis of the wild strawberry (Fragaria vesca) volatile composition. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 121, 99–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. D’Urso, G.; Pizza, C.; Piacente, S.; Montoro, P. Combination of LC–MS based metabolomics and antioxidant activity for evaluation of bioactive compounds in Fragaria vesca leaves from Italy. J. Pharmaceut. Biomed. Anal. 2018, 150, 233–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chamorro, M.F.; Reiner, G.; Theoduloz, C.; Ladio, A.; Schmeda-Hirschmann, G.; Gómez-Alonso, S.; Jiménez-Aspee, F. Polyphenol composition and (bio)activity of berberis species and wild strawberry from the Argentinean Patagonia. Molecules 2019, 24, 3331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Nowicka, A.; Kucharska, A.Z.; Sokół-Łętowska, A.; Fecka, I. Comparison of polyphenol content and antioxidant capacity of strawberry fruit from 90 cultivars of Fragaria × ananassa Duch. Food Chem. 2019, 270, 32–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Vandendriessche, T.; Vermeir, S.; Mayayo Martinez, C.; Hendrickx, Y.; Lammertyn, J.; Nicolaï, B.M.; Hertog, M.L.A.T.M. Effect of ripening and inter-cultivar differences on strawberry quality. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 52, 62–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mazur, S.P.; Nes, A.; Wold, A.B.; Remberg, S.F.; Martinsen, B.K.; Aaby, K. Effects of ripeness and cultivar on chemical composition of strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) fruits and their suitability for jam production as a stable product at different storage temperatures. Food Chem. 2014, 146, 412–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Akšic, M.F.; Zagorac, D.D.; Sredojevic, M.; Milivojevic, J.; Gašic, U.; Meland, M.; Nati, M. Chemometric characterization of strawberries and blueberries according to their phenolic profile: Combined effect of cultivar and cultivation system. Molecules 2019, 24, 4310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Moshiur Rahman, M.; Rahman, M.M.; Hossain, M.M.; Khaliq, Q.A.; Moniruzzaman, M. Effect of planting time and genotypes growth, yield and quality of strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.). Sci. Horticult. 2014, 167, 56–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhang, Y.; Jiang, L.; Li, Y.; Chen, Q.; Ye, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Luo, Y.; Sun, B.; Wang, X.; Tang, H. Effect of red and blue light on anthocyanin accumulation and differential gene expression in strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa). Molecules 2018, 23, 820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Ferreira, J.F.S.; Liu, X.; Suarez, D.L. Fruit yield and survival of five commercial strawberry cultivars under field cultivation and salinity stress. Sci. Horticult. 2019, 243, 401–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mozafari, A.A.; Ghaderi, N.; Havas, F.; Dedejani, S. Comparative investigation of structural relationships among morphophysiological and biochemical properties of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) under drought and salinity stresses: A study based on in vitro culture. Sci. Horticult. 2019, 256, 108601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Voća, S.; Žlabur, J.S.; Dobričević, N.; Jakobek, L.; Šeruga, M.; Galić, A.; Pliestić, S. Variation in the bioactive compound content at three ripening stages of strawberry fruit. Molecules 2014, 19, 10370–10385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Salvatierra, A.; Pimentel, P.; Moya-León, M.A.; Herrera, R. Increased accumulation of anthocyanins in Fragaria chiloensis fruits by transient suppression of FcMYB1 gene. Phytochemistry 2013, 290, 25–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Dias, M.I.; Barros, L.; Sousa, M.J.; Oliveira, M.B.P.P.; Santos-Buelga, C.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Enhancement of nutritional and bioactive compounds by in vitro culture of wild Fragaria vesca L. vegetative parts. Food Chem. 2017, 235, 212–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Delgado, L.D.; Zúñiga, P.E.; Figueroa, N.E.; Pastene, E.; Escobar-Sepúlveda, H.F.; Figueroa, P.M.; Garrido-Bigotes, A.; Figueroa, C.R. Application of a JA-Ile biosynthesis inhibitor to methyl jasmonate-treated strawberry fruit induces upregulation of specific MBW complex-related genes and accumulation of proanthocyanidins. Molecules 2018, 23, 1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Pawlaczyk-Graja, I.; Balicki, S.; Wilk, K.A. Effect of various extraction methods on the structure of polyphenolic-polysaccharide conjugates from Fragaria vesca L. leaf. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 130, 664–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Méndez-Lagunas, L.; Rodríguez-Ramírez, J.; Cruz-Gracida, M.; Sandoval-Torres, S.; Barriada-Bernal, G. Convective drying kinetics of strawberry (Fragaria ananassa): Effects on antioxidant activity, anthocyanins and total phenolic content. Food Chem. 2017, 230, 174–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Álvarez-Fernández, M.A.; Hornedo-Ortega, R.; Cerezo, A.B.; Troncoso, A.M.; García-Parrilla, M.C. Effects of the strawberry (Fragaria ananassa) purée elaboration process on non-anthocyanin phenolic composition and antioxidant activity. Food Chem. 2014, 164, 104–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Pieszka, M.; Tombarkiewicz, B.; Roman, A.; Migdał, W.; Niedziółka, J. Effect of bioactive substances found in rapeseed, raspberry and strawberry seed oils on blood lipid profile and selected parameters of oxidative status in rats. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2013, 36, 1055–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Sikora, E.; Michorczyk, P.; Olszanska, M.; Ogonowsk, J. Supercritical CO2 extract from strawberry seeds as a valuable component of mild cleansing compositions. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2015, 37, 574–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Grzelak-Błaszczyk, K.; Karlińska, E.; Grzęda, K.; Rój, E.; Kołodziejczyk, K. Defatted strawberry seeds as a source of phenolics, dietary fiber and minerals. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 84, 18–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wichtl, M. Herbal drugs and phytopharmaceuticals. In A Handbook of Practice on a Scientific Basis; Brinckmann, J.A., Lindenmaier, M.P., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2004; pp. 220–221. [Google Scholar]
  62. Saric-Kundalic, B.; Dobes, C.; Klatte-Asselmeyer, V.; Saukel, J. Ethnobotanical study on medicinal use of wild and cultivated plants in middle, south and west Bosnia and Herzegovina. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2010, 131, 33–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zhu, F. Anthocyanins in cereals: Composition and health effects. Food Res. Int. 2018, 109, 232–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Sinopoli, A.; Calogero, G.; Bartolotta, A. Computational aspects of anthocyanidins and anthocyanins: A review. Food Chem. 2019, 297, 124898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Braga, A.R.C.; Murador, D.C.; de Souza Mesquita, L.M.; Rosso, V.V. Bioavailability of anthocyanins: Gaps in knowledge, challenges and future research. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2018, 68, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Fierascu, R.C.; Ortan, A.; Fierascu, I.C.; Fierascu, I. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of antioxidant properties of wild-growing plants. A short review. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2018, 24, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Heinrich, M.; Appendino, G.; Efferth, T.; Fürst, R.; Izzo, A.A.; Kayser, O.; Pezzuto, J.M.; Viljoen, A. Best practice in research–Overcoming common challenges in phytopharmacological research. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2020, 246, 112230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Álvarez-Fernández, M.A.; Hornedo-Ortega, R.; Cerezo, A.B.; Troncoso, A.M.; García-Parrilla, M.C. Non-anthocyanin phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of beverages obtained by gluconic fermentation of strawberry. Innov. Food Emerg. Technol. 2014, 26, 469–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kebede, M.; Admassu, S. Application of antioxidants in food processing industry: Options to improve the extraction yields and market value of natural products. Adv. Food. Technol. Nutr. Sci. Open J. 2019, 5, 38–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Lourenço, S.C.; Moldão-Martins, M.; Alves, V.D. Antioxidants of natural plant origins: From sources to food industry applications. Molecules 2019, 24, 4132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Lorenzo, J.M.; Pateiro, M.; Domínguez, R.; Barba, F.J.; Putnik, P.; Bursać Kovačević, D.; Shpigelman, A.; Granato, D.; Franco, D. Berries extracts as natural antioxidants in meat products: A review. Food Res. Int. 2018, 106, 1095–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Zugic, A.; Ðordevic, S.; Arsic, I.; Markovic, G.; Zivkovic, J.; Jovanovic, S.; Tadi, V. Antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds in 10 selected herbs from Vrujci Spa, Serbia. Ind. Crop Prod. 2014, 52, 519–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Dias, M.I.; Barros, L.; Oliveira, M.B.P.P.; Santos-Buelga, C.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Phenolic profile and antioxidant properties of commercial and wild Fragaria vesca L. roots: A comparison between hydromethanolic and aqueous extracts. Ind. Crop Prod. 2015, 63, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Dias, M.I.; Barros, L.; Fernandes, I.P.; Ruphuy, G.; Oliveira, M.B.P.P.; Santos-Buelga, C.; Barreiro, M.F.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. A bioactive formulation based on Fragaria vesca L. vegetative parts: Chemical characterization and application in κ-carrageenan gelatin. J. Funct. Food. 2015, 16, 243–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Giampieri, F.; Alvarez-Suarez, J.M.; Battino, M. Strawberry and human health: Effects beyond antioxidant activity. J. Agricult. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 3867–3876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Vendrame, S.; Klimis-Zacas, D.J. Anti-inflammatory effect of anthocyanins via modulation of nuclear factor-κB and mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling cascades. Nutr. Rev. 2015, 73, 348–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Li, S.; Wu, B.; Fu, W.; Reddivari, L. The anti-inflammatory effects of dietary anthocyanins against ulcerative colitis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Szymanowska, U.; Złotek, U.; Karaś, M.; Baraniak, B. Anti-inflammatory and antioxidative activity of anthocyanins from purple basil leaves induced by selected abiotic elicitors. Food Chem. 2015, 172, 71–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Peng, Y.; Yan, Y.; Wan, P.; Chen, D.; Ding, Y.; Ran, L.; Mi, J.; Lu, L.; Zhang, Z.; Li, X.; et al. Gut microbiota modulation and anti-inflammatory properties of anthocyanins from the fruits of Lycium ruthenicum Murray in dextran sodium sulfate-induced colitis in mice. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2019, 136, 96–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Liberal, J.; Francisco, V.; Costa, G.; Figueirinha, A.; Amaral, M.T.; Marques, C.; Girão, H.; Lopes, M.C.; Cruz, M.T.; Batista, M.T. Bioactivity of Fragaria vesca leaves through inflammation, proteasome and autophagy modulation. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2014, 158, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Gasparrini, M.; Giampieri, F.; Forbes-Hernandez, T.Y.; Afrin, S.; Cianciosi, D.; Reboredo-Rodriguez, P.; Varela-Lopez, A.; Zhang, J.; Quiles, J.L.; Mezzetti, B.; et al. Strawberry extracts efficiently counteract inflammatory stress induced by the endotoxin lipopolysaccharide in Human Dermal Fibroblast. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2018, 114, 128–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Molinett, S.; Nuñez, F.; Moya-León, M.A.; Zúñiga-Hernández, J. Chilean strawberry consumption protects against LPS-induced liver injury by anti-inflammatory and antioxidant capability in Sprague-Dawley rats. Evid.-Based Compl. Alt. Med. 2015, 2015, 320136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Duarte, L.J.; Chaves, V.C.; dos Santos Nascimento, M.V.P.; Calvete, E.; Li, M.; Ciraolo, E.; Ghigo, A.; Hirsch, E.; Simões, C.M.O.; Reginatto, F.H.; et al. Molecular mechanism of action of Pelargonidin-3-O-glucoside, the main anthocyanin responsible for the anti-inflammatory effect of strawberry fruits. Food Chem. 2018, 247, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Van de Velde, F.; Esposito, D.; Grace, M.H.; Pirovani, M.E.; Lila, M.A. Anti-inflammatory and wound healing properties of polyphenolic extracts from strawberry and blackberry fruits. Food Res. Int. 2019, 121, 453–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Gomes, F.; Martins, N.; Barros, L.; Rodrigues, M.E.; Oliveira, M.B.P.P.; Henriques, M.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Plant phenolic extracts as an effective strategy to control Staphylococcus aureus, the dairy industry pathogen. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2018, 112, 515–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Cardoso, O.; Donato, M.M.; Luxo, C.; Almeida, N.; Liberal, J.; Figueirinha, A.; Batista, M.T. Anti-Helicobacter pylori potential of Agrimonia eupatoria L. and Fragaria vesca. J. Funct. Food. 2018, 44, 299–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Ninomiya, M.; Itoh, T.; Ishikawa, S.; Saiki, M.; Narumiya, K.; Yasuda, M.; Koshikawa, K.; Nozawa, Y.; Koketsu, M. Phenolic constituents isolated from Fragaria ananassa Duch. Inhibit antigen-stimulated degranulation through direct inhibition of spleen tyrosine kinase activation. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2010, 18, 5932–5937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Abdulazeez, S.S. Effects of freeze-dried Fragaria x ananassa powder on alloxan-induced diabetic complications in Wistar rats. J. Taibah Univ. Med. Sci. 2014, 9, 268–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Somasagara, R.R.; Hegde, M.; Chiruvella, K.K.; Musini, A.; Choudhary, B.; Raghavan, S.C. Extracts of strawberry fruits induce intrinsic pathway of apoptosis in breast cancer cells and inhibits tumor progression in mice. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, 47021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  90. Forni, C.; Braglia, R.; Mulinacci, N.; Urbani, A.; Ronci, M.; Gismondi, A.; Tabolacci, C.; Provenzano, B.; Lentini, A.; Beninati, S. Antineoplastic activity of strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) crude extracts on B16-F10 melanoma cells. Mol. Biosyst. 2014, 10, 1255–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Lucioli, S.; Pastorino, F.; Nota, P.; Ballan, G.; Frattarelli, A.; Fabbri, A.; Forni, C.; Caboni, E. Extracts from cell suspension cultures of strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch): Cytotoxic effects on human cancer cells. Molecules 2019, 24, 1738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Casto, B.C.; Knobloch, T.J.; Galioto, R.L.; Yu, Z.; Accurso, B.T.; Warner, B.M. Chemoprevention of oral cancer by lyophilized strawberries. Anticancer Res. 2013, 33, 4757–4766. [Google Scholar]
  93. Chen, T.; Shi, N.; Afzali, A. Chemopreventive effects of strawberry and black raspberry on colorectal cancer in inflammatory bowel disease. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Kanodia, L.; Borgohain, M.; Das, S. Effect of fruit extract of Fragaria vesca L. on experimentally induced inflammatory bowel disease in albino rats. Indian. J. Pharmacol. 2011, 43, 18–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Shi, N.; Clinton, S.K.; Liu, Z.; Wang, Y.; Riedl, K.M.; Schwartz, S.J.; Zhang, X.; Pan, Z.; Chen, T. Strawberry phytochemicals inhibit azoxymethane/dextran sodium sulfate-induced colorectal carcinogenesis in Crj: CD-1 mice. Nutrients 2015, 7, 1696–1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Gasperotti, M.; Masuero, D.; Mattivi, F.; Vrhovsek, U. Overall dietary polyphenol intake in a bowl of strawberries: The influence of Fragaria spp. in nutritional studies. J. Funct. Foods 2015, 18, 1057–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Valenzuela, C.; Tapia, C.; López, L.; Bunger, A.; Escalona, V.; Abugoch, L. Effect of edible quinoa protein-chitosan based films on refrigerated strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) quality. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 2015, 18, 406–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Shin, Y.J.; Song, H.Y.; Song, K.B. Effect of a combined treatment of rice bran protein film packaging with aqueous chlorine dioxide washing and ultraviolet-C irradiation on the postharvest quality of ‘Goha’ strawberries. J. Food. Eng. 2012, 113, 374–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Weisany, W.; Amini, J.; Samadi, S.; Hossaini, S.; Yousefi, S.; Struik, P.C. Nano silver-encapsulation of Thymus daenensis and Anethum graveolens essential oils enhances antifungal potential against strawberry anthracnose. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2019, 141, 111808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Fierascu, R.C.; Fierascu, I.; Avramescu, S.M.; Sieniawska, E. Recovery of natural antioxidants from agro-industrial side streams through advanced extraction techniques. Molecules 2019, 24, 4212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Demirbas, A.; Yilmaz, V.; Ildiz, N.; Baldemir, A.; Ocsoy, I. Anthocyanins-rich berry extracts directed formation of Ag NPs with the investigation of their antioxidant and antimicrobial activities. J. Molec. Liq. 2017, 248, 1044–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Fierascu, I.; Georgiev, M.I.; Ortan, A.; Fierascu, R.C.; Avramescu, S.M.; Ionescu, D.; Sutan, A.; Brinzan, A.; Ditu, L.M. Phyto-mediated metallic nanoarchitectures via Melissa officinalis L.: Synthesis, characterization and biological properties. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 12428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Sutan, N.A.; Manolescu, D.S.; Fierascu, I.; Neblea, A.M.; Sutan, C.; Ducu, C.; Soare, L.C.; Negrea, D.; Avramescu, S.M.; Fierascu, R.C. Phytosynthesis of gold and silver nanoparticles enhance in vitro antioxidant and mitostimulatory activity of Aconitum toxicum Reichenb. rhizomes alcoholic extracts. Mat. Sci. Eng. C 2018, 93, 746–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Fierascu, I.; Fierascu, I.C.; Dinu-Pirvu, C.E.; Fierascu, R.C.; Anuta, V.; Velescu, B.S.; Jinga, M.; Jinga, V. A short overview of recent developments on antimicrobial coatings based on phytosynthesized metal nanoparticles. Coatings 2019, 9, 787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Fierascu, R.C.; Ortan, A.; Avramescu, S.M.; Fierascu, I. Phyto-nanocatalysts: Green synthesis, characterization, and applications. Molecules 2019, 24, 3418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Sample Availability: Not available..
Figure 1. Main components Fragaria species identified according literature data.
Figure 1. Main components Fragaria species identified according literature data.
Molecules 25 00498 g001
Table 1. Major (common) components in Fragaria L. aggregate fruits (adapted from [11,12,13,14,15]).
Table 1. Major (common) components in Fragaria L. aggregate fruits (adapted from [11,12,13,14,15]).
ClassCompoundRef.
AnthocyaninsPelargonidin 3-glucoside, cyanidin 3-glucoside, cyanidin 3-rutinoside, pelargonidin 3-galactoside, pelargonidin 3-rutinoside, pelargonidin 3-arabinoside, pelargonidin 3-malylglucoside[11,12,13]
FlavonolsQuercetin, kaempferol, fisetin, their glucuronides, and glycosides[11,12,13,16]
FlavanolsCatechin, proanthocyanidin B1, proanthocyanidin trimer, proanthocyanidin B3[11]
EllagitanninsSanguiin H-6, ellagitannin, ellagic acid, lambertianin C, galloylbis-hexahydroxydiphenoyl-glucose[11]
Phenolic acids4-coumaric acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, ferulic acid, vanillic acid, sinapic acid[15]
VitaminsVitamin C, vitamin B9[14]
MineralsMn, K, Mg, P, Ca[11]
OthersSugars (glucose, fructose, and sucrose), fibers[11]
Table 2. Composition of Fragaria species (as presented by original works published in the reviewed period; references presented in chronological order).
Table 2. Composition of Fragaria species (as presented by original works published in the reviewed period; references presented in chronological order).
SpeciesPlant Part, Other VariablesIdentified Compounds and Main FindingsIdentification MethodRef.
F. chiloensisRipe fruitsAnthocyanins (cyanidin 3-O-glucoside, pelargonidin 3-O-glucoside cyanidin-malonyl-glucoside and pelargonidin-malonyl-glucoside); procyanidins, ellagitannins, ellagic acid and flavonol derivativesHPLC-DAD, LC-ESI-MS[26]
F. chiloensisLeavesProcyanidins, ellagitannins, ellagic acid and flavonol derivativesHPLC-DAD, LC-ESI-MS[26]
F. chiloensisRhizomesProcyanidins, ellagitannins, ellagic acid and flavonol derivativesHPLC-DAD, LC-ESI-MS[26]
Fragaria × ananassaFruitsAnthocyanins (pelargonidin-3-glucoside, pelargonidin-3-rutinoside, cyanidin-3-rutinoside, pelargonidin-3,5-diglucoside, pelargonidin-3-(6-acetyl)-glucoside, 5-carboxypyranopelargonidin-3-glucoside, delphinidin-3-glucoside, peonidin-3-glucoside, cyanidin-3-galactoside), p-hydroxybenzoic acid, (+)-catechin, ellagic acid, p-coumaric acid, quercetin glucosideLC-MS/MS, HPLC-UV/Vis[17]
Fragaria × ananassaFruits, cultivar and seasonal variations Vitamin C, β-carotene, total phenolics, total anthocyanins; genotype influence is stronger than the environmental influenceColorimetric[27]
Fragaria × ananassaFruits, different cultivars on different ripeness stageTotal vitamin C, total phenolics, total anthocyanins, total ellagic acid/pelargonidin-3-glucoside and cyanidin-3-glucoside; higher amounts in pink fruits compared with fully ripped fruitsColorimetric/HPLC-DAD[28]
Fragaria × ananassaFruits, different farming methodsTotal phenolics/pelargonidin-3-glucoside and cyanidin-3-glucoside, vitamin C, higher in organic farming fruitsColorimetric/HPLC-DAD[18]
Fragaria × ananassaFruits, different cultivars (27) and ripening stagesPhenolic compounds (multiple classes, including anthocyanins, flavanols and ellagitannins); composition dependent on cultivar, cinnamic acid conjugates and anthocyanins levels increased with the ripening stageHPLC-DAD-MS[29]
Fragaria × ananassa, F. vescaFruitsQuercetin and isorhamnetin glycosides (higher levels in wild strawberry)HPLC-DAD, LC-ESI-MS[30]
Fragaria × ananassa, F. vescaFruits, different cultivarsVolatile esters (including ethyl acetate, hexyl acetate, methyl butanoate, ethyl butanoate, hexyl butanoate, methyl hexanoate, ethyl hexanoate, hexyl hexanoate); higher levels in cultivated strawberries. GC-MS[19]
F. vescaFruits, two different cultivarsAnthocyanins (cyanidin 3-O-glucoside, pelargonidin 3-O-glucoside, peonidin 3-O-glucoside, cyanidin 3-O-malonylglucoside, pelargonidin 3-O-malonylglucoside, peonidin 3-O-malonylglucoside), dihydroflavonol and flavonols (taxifolin 3-O-arabinoside, kaempferol 3-O-glucoside, quercetin 3-O-glucoside, quercetin-acetylhexoside, kaempferol 3-O-acetylhexosides), flavan-3-ols and proanthocyanidins (catechin, B type proanthocyanidin dimers, trimers, and tetramers), ellagic acid and derivatives (glycosylated, methyl pentoside, methylellagic acid methyl pentoside, ellagitannins), other compounds (benzoic acid, ferulic acid hexose derivative, citric acid, furaneol glucoside)HPLC-DAD[31]
Fragaria × ananassa, F. vescaFruitsAnthocyanins (cyanidin, pelargonidin), cyanidin glycosides (cyanidin 3-glucoside, cyanidin 3-arabinoside, cyanidin 3-sambubioside, delphinidin 3-galactoside, delphinidin 3-glucoside, delphinidin 3-malonylglucoside); higher levels of cyanidin glycosides in wild speciesHPLC-DAD[32]
F. vescaLeavesEllagitannins (sanguiin H-2 isomer, sanguiin H-10 isomer, sanguiin H-6/agrimoniin/lambertianin A isomer, castalagin/vescalagin isomer, sanguiin H-10 isomer, sanguiin H-2 isomer, casuarictin/potentillin isomer)LC-PDA-ESI-MS[33]
Fragaria × ananassaFruits, different cultivars and production yearsVitamin C, anthocyanins (pelargonidin 3-glucoside, cyanidin 3-glucoside, pelargonidin 3-rutinoside), ellagic acid; strongly dependent on the cultivar and production yearHPLC-UV/Vis[34]
Fragaria × ananassaFruits, at different ripening stageVitamin C, pelargonidin-3-rutinoside, ellagic acid, cyanidin-3-glucoside, quercetin (red fruits), neochlorogenic, pelargonidin-3-glucoside, pelargonidin-3-rutinoside, epicatechin, quercetin-3-β-d-glucoside, ellagic acid (green fruits)LC-ESI-TOF[35]
Fragaria × ananassaCalyx (red and green)Quercetin-3-β-d-glucoside, ellagic acid, kaempferol-3-O-glucoside, vitamin C (red), catechin, quercetin-3-β-d-glucoside, ellagic acid (green)LC-ESI-TOF[35]
Fragaria × ananassaFlowerCatechin, quercetin-3-β-d-glucoside, ellagic acid, kaempferol-3-O-glucoside, vitamin CLC-ESI-TOF[35]
Fragaria × ananassaLeafProcyanidin dimer and trimer, catechin, quercetin-3-β-d-glucoside, vitamin C, ellagic acidLC-ESI-TOF[35]
Fragaria × ananassaStolonNeochlorogenic, procyanidin dimer, catechin, quercetin-3-β-d-glucoside, ellagic acid, vitamin C, kaempferol-3-O-glucosideLC-ESI-TOF[35]
Fragaria × ananassaStemProcyanidin dimer, catechin, ferulic acid, quercetin-3-β-d-glucoside, ellagic acidLC-ESI-TOF[35]
Fragaria × ananassaCrownProcyanidin dimer and trimer, catechin, propelargonidin dimer, ellagic acidLC-ESI-TOF[35]
Fragaria × ananassaRootProcyanidin dimer and trimer, catechin, neochlorogenic, propelargonidin dimerLC-ESI-TOF[35]
Fragaria × ananassaFruits, different novel cultivarsPhenolic acids (p-coumaric acid, ellagic acid, ferulic acid derivative, p-coumaric acid derivatives), monomeric flavanols ((+)-catechin), flavonols (quercetin 3-O-glucoside, fisetin, quercetin 3-O-glucoside derivative), anthocyanins (cyanidin 3-glucoside, cyanidin 3-rutinoside, cyanidin pentoside, pelargonidin 3-galactoside, pelargonidin 3,5-diglucoside, pelargonidin 3-glucoside, pelargonidin 3-rutinoside, cyanidin 3-Oacetylglucoside, cyanidin hexoside, pelargonidin 3-O-monoglucuronide, pelargonidin derivatives)HPLC-DAD, LC-ESI-QTOF[36]
Fragaria × ananassaFruits, grown on different altitudes, on consecutive yearsHydroxybenzoic acid, p-coumaric acid, other hydroxycinnamic acids, (+)-catechin, (−)-epicatechin, procyanidins, flavonols, anthocyanins (cyanidin 3-glucoside, pelargonidin 3-glucoside, pelargonidin derivative); higher levels recorded at lower altitudes.HPLC-DAD[37]
Fragaria × ananassaFruitsKaempferol 3-(6-methylglucuronide), quercetin 3-(6-methylglucuronide), isorhamnetin 3-(6-methylglucuronide), trichocarpin, 2-p-hydroxybenzoyl-2,4,6-tri hydroxyphenylacetate, 2-p-hydroxyphene thyl-6-caffeoylglucoside, zingerone 4-glucoside, b-hydroxypropiovanillone 3-glucoside, (+)-isolariciresinol 90-glucoside, (−)-isolariciresinol 90-glucoside, aviculin, (−)-secoisolariciresinol 4-glucoside, cupressoside A, cedrusin, icariside E4, dihydrodehydrodiconiferyl alcohol 90-glucoside, massonianoside A, urolignoside, (−)-pinoresinol 4-glucoside, 2,3”-epoxy-4-(butan-2-one-3-yl)-5,7,40-trihydroxy flavane 3-glucoside, kaempferol 3-(6-butylglucuronide), benzyl 2-glucosyl-6-rhamnosylbenzoate1H NMR, 13C NMR, HMBC, HPLC-UV/Vis, LC-MS/MS, HR-ESI-MS, [20]
F. vescaFruits, wild and cultivated, from different geographical areas39 phenolic compounds (including cyanidin 3-O-glucoside, delphinidin-3-O-glucoside, pelargonidin-3-O-glucoside, pelargonidin-3-O-rutinoside, (+) catechin, (−) epicatechin, procyanidin B1 and B2, isoquercetin, gallic acid, p-coumaric acid, phloridzin); composition dependent on the geographical areaLC-ESI-Orbitrap-MS, LC-ESI-QTrap-MS, LC-ESI-QTrap-MS/MS[38]
Fragaria × ananassaFruits, different cultivarsCyanidin 3-O-glucoside, pelargonidin-3-O-glucoside, pelargonidin-O-rutinoside, total anthocyanins content, dependent on the cultivarUPLC-PDA-ESI-MS, HPLC-DAD[39]
F. vescaFruitsVolatile composition—one hundred compounds (including esters, aldehydes, ketones, alcohols, terpenoids, furans and lactones).GS-MS[40]
F. vescaLeaves27 metabolites (organic acids, flavonoids, catechin and its oligomers, ellagitannins), including quinic acid, chelidonic acid, quercetin derivatives, catechin and procyanidins, phloridzin, pedunculagin, methyl ellagic acid glucuronide.LC-ESI-Orbitrap-MS[41]
Fragaria × ananassa, F. vescaWhite-fruited mutants, different genotypesAnthocyanins, flavonols, flavan-3-ols, hydroxycinnamic acids, and ellagic acid—derived compounds, dependent on genotypeLC-ESI-MS/MS[21]
F. chiloensisFruitsAnthocyanins (cyanidin-3-O-glucoside, pelargonidin hexoside, cyanidin manlonyl hexoside, pelargonidin-malonyl hexoside), ellagitannins (ellagic acid hexoside, pentoside, rhamnoside), proanthocyanidin dimers, epicatechin, flavonols (quercetin pentoside, glucuronide)HPLC-DAD, LC-ESI-MS[42]
Fragaria × ananassaFruits, different cultivarsAnthocyanins, flavonoids, cinnamic acid derivatives, tannins and related compounds, triterpenoids; concentration dependent on the cultivarUPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS, HPLC-DAD[43]
where:13C NMR—Carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance; GC-MS—gas chromatography–mass spectrometry; 1H NMR—proton nuclear magnetic resonance; HMBC —heteronuclear multiple bond correlation; HPLC-DAD—high-performance liquid chromatography with diode array detector; HPLC-UV/Vis—high-performance liquid chromatography equipped with UV/vis detector; HR-ESI-MS—high-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometry analysis; LC-ESI-MS(/MS)—liquid chromatography electrospray ionization (tandem) mass spectrometry analysis; LC-ESI-Orbitrap-MS—liquid chromatography electrospray ionization Orbitrap mass spectrometry; LC-ESI-QTrap-MS(/MS)—liquid chromatography electrospray ionization quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometry; LC–ESI–(Q)TOF—liquid chromatography electrospray ionization with (quadrupole) time-of-flight; LC-MS/MS—liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry; LC-PDA-ESI-MS—liquid chromatography equipped with photodiode array detector coupled to mass spectrometry using the electrospray ionization interface; UPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS—ultra-performance liquid chromatography equipped quadrupole time of flight coupled to tandem mass spectrometry using the electrospray ionization interface; UPLC-PDA-ESI-MS—ultra-performance liquid chromatography equipped with photodiode array detector coupled to mass spectrometry using the electrospray ionization interface.
Table 3. Antioxidant properties of different extracts obtained from Fragaria species (references presented in chronological order).
Table 3. Antioxidant properties of different extracts obtained from Fragaria species (references presented in chronological order).
SpeciesExtraction MethodAntioxidant AssayAntioxidant PotentialResponsible CompoundsRef.
Fragaria × ananassa, Camarosa var. fruitsAnthocyanins isolated using CCCORAC, FRAPORAC: 2.7–24.46 mmol Trolox/g; FRAP: 2.75–12.5 mmol Fe2+/g (depending on the fraction)Anthocyanins[17]
Fragaria chiloensis spp. chiloensis form chiloensis fruitsMethanol: formic acid (99:1 v/v) extractionDPPH, SASDPPH assay: IC50 = 38.7 mg/L; SAS: 79.3%)Aglycone and glycosylated ellagic acid and flavonoids[26]
Fragaria chiloensis spp. chiloensis form chiloensis leavesMethanol: formic acid (99:1 v/v) extractionDPPH, SASDPPH assay: IC50 = 49.4 mg/L; SAS: 67.60%Aglycone and glycosylated ellagic acid and flavonoids[26]
Fragaria chiloensis spp. chiloensis form chiloensis rhizomesMethanol: formic acid (99:1 v/v) extractionDPPH, SASDPPH assay: IC50 = 64.8 mg/L; SAS: 55%Aglycone and glycosylated ellagic acid and flavonoids[26]
Fragaria x ananassa Osogrande var. frozen fruitsAcetone (80%) extractionDPPH, FRAPDPPH: 11.91–12.83 μmol BHT eq./g FW; best results for ripe fruits FRAP: 27.37–36.75 μmol FS eq./g FW; best results for green fruits Total phenolic content, vitamin C[28]
Fragaria x ananassa Camino Real var. frozen fruitsAcetone (80%) extractionDPPH, FRAPDPPH: 9.75–12.01 μmol BHT eq./g FW, FRAP: 24.13–28.49 μmol FS eq./g FW (best results for pink fruits)Total phenolic content, vitamin C[28]
F. vesca leavesMethanol, ultrasounds extractionDPPH, FRAPDPPH: IC50 = 13.46 mg/L; FRAP: 0.878 mmol Fe2+/g DWTotal phenols, total tannins[72]
F. vesca roots, wild-growing Hydromethanolic extraction, infusion, decoctionDPPH, FRAP, β-Carotene bleaching inhibition, TBARSIC50, mg/L: DPPH—50.03/50.56/50.62; FRAP—40.98/44.78/49.23; β-C bleaching—116.26/44.88/66.10; TBARS—35.76/4.76/6.14Total phenolics, total flavan-3-ols, total dihydroflavonols,[73]
F. vesca roots, commercialHydromethanolic extraction, infusion, decoctionDPPH, FRAP, β-Carotene bleaching inhibition, TBARSIC50, mg/L: DPPH—68.89/255.81/51.32; FRAP—327.75/78.99/67.92; β-C bleaching—68.34/23.44/114.67; TBARS—6.69/24.25/10.62Total phenolics, total flavan-3-ols, total dihydroflavonols,[73]
Fragaria × ananassa var. Amaou, fruits, at different ripening stage Ethanol or water room temperature extractionModified ABTS assayEthanol: 150.5/151.9; water: 227.2/189.4 (red/green fruits) μmol TE/100 g FWTotal phenolic content[35]
Fragaria × ananassa var. Amaou calyx (red and green)Ethanol or water room temperature extractionModified ABTS assayEthanol: 241.1/1239.9; water: 1716.6/577.7 μmol TE/100 g FW (red/green calyx)Total phenolic content[35]
Fragaria × ananassa var. Amaou flowerEthanol or water room temperature extractionModified ABTS assay4234.4/387.5 μmol TE/100 g FW (ethanol/water)Total phenolic content[35]
Fragaria × ananassa var. Amaou leavesEthanol or water room temperature extractionModified ABTS assay2401.7/241.1 μmol TE/100 g FW (ethanol/water)Total phenolic content[35]
Fragaria × ananassa var. Amaou stolonEthanol or water room temperature extractionModified ABTS assay1089.4/1856.7 μmol TE/100 g FW (ethanol/water)Total phenolic content[35]
Fragaria × ananassa var. Amaou stemEthanol or water room temperature extractionModified ABTS assay1338.6/1123.1 μmol TE/100 g FW (ethanol/water)Total phenolic content[35]
Fragaria × ananassa var. Amaou crownEthanol or water room temperature extractionModified ABTS assay6213.3/128.7 μmol TE/100 g FW (ethanol/water)Total phenolic content[35]
Fragaria × ananassa var. Amaou rootEthanol or water room temperature extractionModified ABTS assay253.1/69.2 μmol TE/100 g FW (ethanol/water)Total phenolic content[35]
F. vesca vegetative parts (leaves and stems), wild-growing Hydromethanolic and aqueous extracts; wild-growing infusion microencapsulated in alginate and incorporated in k-carrageenan gelatineDPPH, FRAP, β-Carotene bleaching inhibition, TBARSIC50, mg/L: DPPH—123.67/86.17/109.10; FRAP—81.40/62.36/77.28; β-C bleaching—56.71/12.34/13.40; TBARS—12.63/3.12/5.03 (hydromethanolic/infusion/decoction); Final formulation (mg/mL)—DPPH—2.74; FRAP = 1.23Total phenolics, total flavan-3-ols, total dihydroflavonols,[74]
F. vesca vegetative parts (leaves and stems), commercialHydromethanolic and aqueous extractsDPPH, FRAP, β-Carotene bleaching inhibition, TBARSIC50, mg/L: DPPH—139.33/121.94/118.89; FRAP—324.49/91.88/88.20; β-C bleaching—388.90/76.41/69.98; TBARS—24.36/23.07/17.52 (hydromethanolic/infusion/decoction).Total phenolics, total flavan-3-ols, total dihydroflavonols,[74]
Fragaria x ananassa cv. Falandi fruit22 compounds isolated from ethanolic extracts ABTS, DPPH, FRAPBest results (IC50): ABTS—4.42 μM kaempferol 3-(6-methylglucuronide); DPPH—32.12 μM quercetin 3-(6-methylglucuronide); FRAP—0.05 mmol/g—urolignoside.Individual compounds[20]
Fragaria x ananassa cv. Albion, Aromas, Camarosa, Camino Real, Monte Rey, Portola, and San Andreas fruitsUltrasonic extraction with acidified methanolDPPHIC50 (mg/mL) ranging from 76.73 (Camarosa)—100 (Camino Real)Total anthocyanin content[39]
F. vesca leaves native to ItalyUltrasonic extraction with ethanol: water solvent (70:30, v/v)TEAC0.34–0.35 mg/mL Trolox eq., compared with quercetin (0.40)Condensed tannins and flavonoid derivatives[41]
Fragaria x ananassa cv. Tochiotome leavesSupercritical CO2 extraction with different entrainersDPPH0.07 (simple supercritical extraction)—5.82 μmol BHT/g sample (with ethanol, dried at 40 °C)Phenolic compounds[10]
Fragaria × ananassa fruits (90 cultivars)Ultrasonic aqueous methanol (70%) acidified with 1.5% formic acid, at room temperatureDPPH, ABTSAverage values (μmol Trolox/100 g):765.06 (DPPH), 1637.96 (ABTS)Tannin-based compounds.[43]
where: ABTS—2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) assay; BHT—butylated hydroxytoluene; DPPH—reduction of 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl; DW—dry weight; eq.—equivalents; FRAP—ferric reducing ability of plasma; FS—ferrous sulphate; FW—fresh weight; IC50—half maximal inhibitory concentration; ORAC—oxygen radical absorbance capacity; SAS—superoxide anion assay; TBARS—thiobarbituric acid reactive substances assay; TEAC—Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity.
Table 4. Main biological activities presented in the literature (references listed in chronological order).
Table 4. Main biological activities presented in the literature (references listed in chronological order).
ActionPlantExtraction MethodAssayResultsResponsible CompoundsRef.
Anti-inflammatory on inflammatory bowel diseaseFragaria vesca leavesEth. extractionMPO activity; GSH, SOD and CAT levelsPrevention of increase in colon weight and disease activity index, decrease in macroscopic and microscopic lesion score; significant improvement of MPO, CAT and SOD levels at 500 mg/kg 5 days oral treatmentPhenolic acids, flavonoids[94]
Anti-inflammatoryFragaria vesca leavesEth. extraction at room temperature, infusionNitric oxide production, western blot analysis (expression of pro-inflammatory proteins in lipopolysaccharide-triggered macrophages); nitric oxide scavenger activityInhibition of nitrite production on pre-treated cells (at 80 and 160 mg/L—31%/40%); 23% inhibition in culture media, at 160 mg/LPhenolic content[80]
Anti-inflammatoryFragaria x ananassa, var. Alba fruitsMeth. extraction at room temperature, infusionDetermination of ROS intracellular levels, apoptosis detection, antioxidant enzyme activities, immunoblotting analysis, determination of mitochondrial respiration and extracellular acidification rate in cellsReduction of intracellular ROS levels (significant at 100 mg/L), decreased apoptotic rate (significant at 50 and 100 mg/L); Increased ARE-antioxidant enzymes expression, reduced NO and inflammatory cytokines production (at 50 and 100 mg/L) to control levelsVitamin C, anthocyanins, flavonoids[81]
Anti-inflammatory, hepatoprotectiveFragaria chiloensisssp. Chiloensis fruitsAq. extractsHistological analyses, determination of transaminases, cytokines, F2-isoprostanes, and glutathione assaysmaintained hepatocellular membrane, structural integrity, attenuated hepatic oxidative stress, and inhibited inflammatory response in LPS-induced liver injury; downregulation of cytokines (TNFa, IL-1β, and IL-6)Phenolic content[82]
Anti-inflammatoryFragaria x ananassa var. Camarosa fruitsUltrasonic-assisted, acidified meth. extraction, separationIn vivo: quantification of the leukocyte content, exudate concentration, MPO and ADA activities, nitric oxide products, TNF-α and IL-6 levels; in vitro: MTT assay, measurement of nitric oxide products, TNF-α and IL-6 levels, western blot analysisInhibition of the carrageenan-induced leukocyte influx to the pleural cavity; reduction of myeloperoxidase activity, exudate concentration, NO levels.Phenolic compounds, anthocyanins (particularly pelargonidin-3-O-glucoside)[83]
Anti-inflammatory, wound healingFragaria x ananassa var. San Andreas fruitsUltrasound-assisted extraction, acidified meth.: aq. (80:20); separation of different fractionsMTT assay, ROS, NO levels, effects on inflammatory markers and on skin fibroblast migrationROS reduction, suppression of IL-1β, IL-6 and iNOS gene expressions; enhanced skin fibroblast migrationPolyphenolic compounds, especially anthocyanins[84]
Anti-microbialFragaria vesca leaves and rootsCentrifugation extraction with meth.: aq. (80:20)Disc diffusion assay6–9 mm inhibition zones for leaves, 5–9 mm for roots (depending on S. aureus strain)Phenolic compounds[85]
Anti-microbialFragaria vesca leavesHydroalcoholic extraction, separationDisc diffusion assayGood inhibition potential at 25 mg/mL, better effect for the ellagitannin-enriched fractionEllagitannins[86]
Anti-allergenicFragaria x ananassa var. Minomusume fruitsMethanol fraction of fruits juice (obtained by squeezing)Antigen-stimulated degranulation in RBL-2H3 cellsdegranulation suppression (95–60% inhibition for linocinnamarin, cinnamic acid, chrysin, kaempferol, trans-tiliroside)Best results - phenylpropanoid glycoside[87]
Anti-diabeticFragaria x ananassa var. Falandi fruitsCompounds isolated from eth. extractsα-glucosidase inhibitory activityIC50 values better than the positive control (acarbose) for nine compounds (537.43 to 25.39 μM)Individual compounds[20]
Anti-obesity, anti-allergy, skin-lighteningFragaria ×ananassa var. Amaou, entire plant (red fruit, green fruit, red calyx, green calyx, flower, leaf, stolon, stolon leaf, stem, crown and root)Eth. or aq. room temperature extractionAnti-lipase assay, adipocyte differentiation inhibition assay, melanogenesis inhibition assay, β-hexosaminidase inhibition assay, tyrosinase inhibition assayCrown, stolon leaf and flowers extracts exhibited the highest effectsTotal phenolic content[35]
Antihyperuricemic Fragaria x ananassa cv. Tochiotome leavesSupercritical CO2 extraction with different entrainersUric acid production in AML12 hepatocytesReduction of uric acid at 100 mg/mL (96 mmol/2 h/mg protein), compared with the control (16,096 mmol/2 h/mg protein)Kaempferol, quercetin[10]
Cytotoxic, anti-proliferativeFragaria x ananassa fruitsMeth. extractionEx vivo: cell viability assay; in vivo: developing tumor size determinationCytotoxic on cancer cells, blocked the proliferation of tumor cellsPhenolic compounds[89]
AntineoplasticFragaria x ananassa var. Pajaro fruitsAcidified hydro-eth. extractionTransglutaminase assay and polyamine detection, immunoblot analysisreduction of cell proliferation, lowering of the intracellular levels of polyamine, enhancement of tissue transglutaminase activityAnthocyanins[90]
CytotoxicFragaria vesca L. leavesHydroalcoholic extract at room temperature, ellagitannins-enriched fractionEffects on HepG2 cells—cell viability assessment, cell proliferation, cell cycle and cell death analysis, Western blot analysis, proteasome chymotrypsin-like activityInhibition of HepG2 cell viability IC50 = 690 mg/L (extract)/113 mg/L (fraction); fraction induced necrosis and apoptosis, influenced the cellular proteolytic mechanismsEllagitannins[33]
ChemopreventiveLyophilized Fragaria x ananassa fruitsUltrasound-assisted extraction with acidified acetoneHistological studies, Western blot analysis, PGE2 measurement, and nitrate/nitrite colorimetric assayDecreased tumor incidence, decreased levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, COX-2 and iNOS, inhibition of the phosphorylation of PI3K, Akt, ERK, and NFκBanthocyanins, ellagitannin/ellagic acid/ellagic acid derivatives flavonols[95]
CytotoxicFragaria x ananassa leavesHydroalcoholic extracts (meth., eth., isopropanol) from in vitro cell suspensionCell proliferation, cell viabilityUnder 50% viable cells for colorectal adenocarcinoma and colon adenocarcinoma upon treatment with extracts containing 0.29 mM ethoxy-dihydrofuro-furanPolyphenols[91]
where: ADA—adenosine-deaminase; Akt—Protein Kinase B; aq.—water (aqueous); CAT—catalase; COX-2—cyclooxygenase-2 enzyme; ERK—extracellular signal-regulated kinase; eth—ethanol; GSH—glutathione; HepG2—human liver cancer cell line; IC50—half maximal inhibitory concentration; IL-1β—Interleukin 1 beta cytokine protein; IL-6—interleukin 6; iNOS—inducible nitric oxide synthase; meth.—methanol; MPO—myeloperoxidase; MTT—3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide; NFκB—nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells; NO—nitric oxide; PGE2—Prostaglandin E2; PI3K—phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; RBL—rat basophilic leukemia cells; ROS—reactive oxygen species; SOD—superoxide dismutase; TNF-α—tumor necrosis factor alpha;.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fierascu, R.C.; Temocico, G.; Fierascu, I.; Ortan, A.; Babeanu, N.E. Fragaria Genus: Chemical Composition and Biological Activities. Molecules 2020, 25, 498. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25030498

AMA Style

Fierascu RC, Temocico G, Fierascu I, Ortan A, Babeanu NE. Fragaria Genus: Chemical Composition and Biological Activities. Molecules. 2020; 25(3):498. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25030498

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fierascu, Radu Claudiu, Georgeta Temocico, Irina Fierascu, Alina Ortan, and Narcisa Elena Babeanu. 2020. "Fragaria Genus: Chemical Composition and Biological Activities" Molecules 25, no. 3: 498. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25030498

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop