Next Article in Journal
Design of Disruptors of the Hsp90–Cdc37 Interface
Next Article in Special Issue
Blood and Plasma Volumetric Absorptive Microsampling (VAMS) Coupled to LC-MS/MS for the Forensic Assessment of Cocaine Consumption
Previous Article in Journal
Androgen Receptor in Breast Cancer—Clinical and Preclinical Research Insights
Previous Article in Special Issue
SPME-GC/MS Analysis of Methanol in Biospecimen by Derivatization with Pyran Compound
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Correlations Between Trace Elements in Selected Locations of the Human Brain in Individuals with Alcohol Use Disorder

1
Department of Anatomy, Medical University of Lublin, Jaczewskiego 4, 20-090 Lublin, Poland
2
Department of Neurosurgery and Pediatric Neurosurgery, Medical University of Lublin, Jaczewskiego 8, 20-954 Lublin, Poland
3
Faculty of Chemistry, Department of Analytical Chemistry, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, 89B Umultowska Street, 61-614 Poznan, Poland
4
Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 38D, 20-618 Lublin, Poland
5
Department of Analytical Chemistry, Medical University of Lublin, Chodźki 4a, 20-093 Lublin, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2020, 25(2), 359; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25020359
Submission received: 11 November 2019 / Revised: 5 January 2020 / Accepted: 10 January 2020 / Published: 15 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Forensic Analytical Chemistry)

Abstract

:
Trace element distribution varies in different locations of the human brain. Several elements were found to cause various negative effects, such as neurodegeneration. In this paper, we analyzed the interactions between seven trace elements: zinc (Zn), selenium (Se), manganese (Mg), iron (Fe), copper (Cu), chromium (Cr) and cobalt (Co) in individuals with alcohol use disorder (AUD) and individuals without (control group). Brain tissue samples from 31 individuals with AUD and 31 control subjects were harvested. Inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry was used for trace element determination. In the control group, there were several positive correlations between Cr, Cu, Fe and Mn. In the AUD group, positive correlations between Co and Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn were found. The majority of correlations between Zn and other elements are positive. In the studied group, Mn had strong positive correlations with Co, Cr, Cu and Fe. The strongest positive correlation found between average element concentration was between Cu and Cr. The knowledge of kinetics and metabolism of trace elements as well as the impact of alcohol on these processes is essential for understanding the pathological processes and functioning of human brain tissue.

1. Introduction

Trace element distribution varies in different types of human tissue [1,2,3], as well as in different locations of the human brain. Several elements were found to have negative properties [4], inducing oxidative stress processes, and thus neurodegeneration [5,6,7]. The homeostasis of biometals is well regulated in healthy human brains and improper function of these systems may cause dysfunction of physiological brain processes [8]. The connection between improper trace element distribution and neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s is well described in the literature [6]. Chronic copper, zinc and iron exposure was found to alter the processes of disease-associated proteins such as amyloid beta, amyloid precursor protein and tau protein.
Alcohol consumption is an important risk factor for disability, illness [9,10] and increased mortality [11]. People who regularly drink large amounts of alcohol, which can be defined as more than 40 g of pure alcohol per day by men and 20 g of pure alcohol per day by women are particularly vulnerable [12]. Not only is alcohol a source of trace elements itself, but chronic consumption of ethanol is a cause of malabsorption, malnutrition and is associated with vitamin and trace element deficiencies [13]. The correlations between trace elements in the human brain are still poorly described. In this paper, we analyzed the interactions between seven trace elements: zinc (Zn), selenium (Se), manganese (Mg), iron (Fe), copper (Cu), chromium (Cr) and cobalt (Co) in individuals with alcohol use disorder (AUD) and individuals without (control group).

2. Results

We discussed correlations that showed a strong or moderate association (R ≥ 0.7) presented in Figure 1 and Table 1 in more detail. Among the studied relationships, many correlations were found in different areas of the brain—the results are presented in Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7, Figure 8, Figure 9, Figure 10 and Figure 11.
In the Co–Al pair of elements, there was a slight positive correlation in the frontal cortex region, the caudate nucleus, the thalamus region and the cingular cortex region.
For the Co and Cr pair in the group exposed to alcohol, positive correlations were found for the following locations: frontal cortex, dorsal anterior cingular cortex, the head of the caudate nucleus and the frontal part of the thalamus. For this pair of elements in the control group, a moderate positive relationship was found in the frontal cortex region and a weak negative correlation was found in the foot of the hippocampus.
In the Co–Fe pair, a positive association was observed in the alcohol use disorder group in all studied regions, except the foot of the hippocampus and the frontal part of the insula region. In contrast, in the control group, for the nucleus accumbens, superior longitudinal fasciculus and frontal part of the insula region, a moderate negative correlation was found. The strongest negative correlation was in the frontal part of the insula.
For the pair of elements Co–Mn in the alcohol use disorder group, positive correlations were found in most of the studied structures, with the exception of the inferior longitudinal fasciculus, frontal part of the insula and foot of the hippocampus. A statistically significant negative relationship was observed in the group not exposed to the alcohol factor only for the frontal part of the insula structure.
In the Cr–Cu pair, a moderately positive relationship was found in 10 studied areas. In the control group, a similar relationship was observed in a few areas.
Between Cu and Fe, moderate and strong relationships were found in the examined areas of the brain in both groups included in the study.
In case of Cu–Mn, as for Zn–Mn, high correlation coefficients were observed in all studied areas, indicating a strong positive relationship. In the control group, such dependence is also observed, but slightly weaker.
Positive correlations of Cr and Mn were observed in both groups.
In the Cu–Zn pair, a positive correlation was found in the alcohol use disorder group in all studied regions. In the control group, the relationship was not statistically significant in most of the studied areas.
Between Fe and Mn, positive correlations were observed in all of the analyzed locations in both groups, however they were slightly stronger in the alcohol use disorder group.
In the group with alcohol use disorder for the studied Fe–Zn pair of elements, strong positive monotone relationships were found in all examined brain structures. The relationship was strongest in the frontal part of the insula.
The Mn–Zn pair of elements had high positive correlations in all tested areas of the group exposed to the alcohol factor. In the control group, a moderate positive association was found in the frontal cortex and superior longitudinal fasciculus region.
Correlation matrices comparisons by Schott test were performed (Table 2). Test statistics and p-values for particular regions are listed below. All comparisons showed significant differences in correlation matrices between groups.

3. Discussion

In this paper, several pairs of trace elements were presented which significantly statistically correlated with each other. Given that there are plenty of complex transport mechanisms for each element, it is problematic to discuss the kinetic interactions between these trace elements. However, further research is necessary regarding distribution and mutual correlation of trace elements [12,14,15,16,17].
There are approximately 7% of individuals throughout the world over 18 years of age who are considered to be habitual consumers of alcohol. Undoubtedly, alcoholic beverages are the source of different trace elements. Data presented by Darret et al. show that beer is a source of Cr and Se and wine contains large amounts of Al, Cr, Ni, Zn and Mg [18].
In the study assessing Cr and Se relationships in chicken brains, it was found that the group exposed to selenium and chromium had a lower concentration of chromium in tissues than the group exposed only to chromium. A clear negative correlation was observed in the pair of elements Cr and Se [19]. This does not correspond with the results obtained in this study. In the alcohol use disorder group, no significant relationship between these elements was found. On the other hand, in the control group, a moderate positive correlation was observed in most of the studied areas.
Research conducted by Rahil-Khazen et al. reports a positive correlation of many element pairs in the soft tissues of healthy patients (n = 30) such as the brain, liver, cortex and spleen. Most dependencies were found in the renal cortex and medulla (e.g., Fe–Co, Cu–Mn, Zn–Mn, Cu–Se and Zn–Cu). There was a strong positive relationship in the Fe–Co pair of trace elements in the brain [20]. On the contrary, in this study, a moderate negative relationship between Fe and Co in tissues from the nucleus accumbens, frontal part of the insula, anterior cingular cortex, and superior longitudinal fasciculus regions was found in the control group. In the alcohol use disorder group, a moderate positive correlation was found for most of the studied areas.
The literature describes a significant positive correlation between Cu, Fe, Zn and Mn in different human organs, which was consistent with the results obtained in this study [21]. Another study performed by Rahil-Khazen et al. reports that Zn–Fe had a negative correlation in soft tissues such as the brain, liver, kidney cortex and spleen, which is opposite to the results found in this study in patients with alcohol use disorder [22]. Moreover, several studies have shown that ethanol increases the permeability of the blood–brain barrier [23,24] as well as the blood–cerebrospinal fluid barrier [25]. Kornhuber et al. suggest that the permeability of these barriers is increased not only due to the dosage of consumed alcohol, but also by chronic intake.
The majority of correlations between elements in this study are positive and have bigger strengths among the group with alcohol use disorder compared to the control group, which may suggest a dysfunction within the blood–brain barrier in those individuals. Moreover, it is well known that disturbed homeostasis of elements such as Al [26], Fe [27], Zn and Cu [28] as well as alcohol itself induces oxidative stress processes, which increase the permeability of the blood–brain barrier. Moreover, it causes malfunction of endothelial cells [24], which are partially responsible for transportation within the blood–brain barrier [29]. Improper function of the blood–brain barrier may promote the accumulation of trace elements within brain tissue, which are known to cause neurodegeneration [30,31].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Population

Brain tissue samples were taken from individuals who underwent autopsy in the Department of Forensic Medicine, University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland. The authors harvested tissue samples from 31 people (8 female and 23 male) suffering from alcoholic use disorder. The inclusion criteria included no history of mental disorders, alcohol abuse reported in medical history as well as alcohol level over 2 per mil confirmed in blood at the time of the section. Moreover, thirty-one control subjects (Table 3) underwent tissue harvesting with inclusion criteria of macroscopically unaltered brain tissue, lack of documented neurodegenerative disease and alcoholic disorder history and blood alcohol level 0 per mil, confirmed at the time of the section. The study was approved by the Local Ethical Committee (Medical University of Lublin, Poland, approval no. KE-0254/2018) and the tissue collection was approved by the prosecutor’s office. The research has been carried out in accordance with The Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association, Declaration of Helsinki for experiments involving humans.

4.2. Procedure of Tissue Collection

Qualified pathologists collected the samples in accordance with the analytical protocol. Suprapure nitric acid solution (5% (v/v)) was used to decontaminate all of the materials that were in contact with the tissue samples. Moreover, ultrapure water (Milli-Q, Millipore, Raleigh, NC, USA; resistivity: 18.2 MΩ·cm) was used to thoroughly wash the tools.
The brain was removed from the cranium and washed with ultrapure water. Plastic tweezers were used to remove the meninges and the brain was rinsed with ultrapure water in order to reduce the probability of sample contamination with cerebrospinal fluid or blood. Disinfected plastic knives were used to collect tissue samples (approximately 0.5 g) from ten anatomical brain structures: frontal cortex (Broadmann area no. 11, PFC), dorsal anterior cingular cortex (Broadmann area no. 32, ACC), post central gyrus (Broadmann area no. 1, PCG), the foot of the hippocampus (HPC), frontal part of the thalamus (FTH), nucleus accumbens (NAC), frontal part of the insula (INS), the head of the caudate nucleus (CA), superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF), and inferior longitudinal fasciculus (ILF). The selection of brain regions was based on their functional properties (memory, aggression, addiction, higher cognitive functions, emotion). Tissue samples were thoroughly rinsed with deionized water, drained on sterile blotting paper and weighed afterwards. All samples were put into sterile polypropylene containers (Bionovo, Legnica, Poland) and initially decayed with the use of 2 mL of 65% suprapure nitric acid. There was limited mass loss of the samples, which were digested directly after sampling without preliminary drying. In the last stage of the experiment, each sample was quantitatively transferred to closed Teflon containers and digested at 180 °C utilizing the microwave digestion system Mars 6 (CEM Corporation, Matthews, NC, USA). After digestion, samples were diluted with water to meet a total volume of 10.0 mL using scaled test-tubes.

4.3. Analytical Procedure

The inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer Agilent 5110 ICP-OES (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was employed for trace element determination. The synchronous vertical dual view (SVDV) of the plasma was accomplished by using dichronic spectral combiner (DSC) technology. This allows simultaneous axial and radial view analysis. In doing so, radio frequency (RF) power was 1.2 kW, nebulizer gas flow was 0.7 L min−1, auxiliary gas flow was 1.0 L min−1, plasma gas flow was 12.0 L min−1, charge coupled device (CCD) temperature was −40 °C, viewing height for radial plasma observation was 8 mm, and accusation time was 5 s. The analysis was repeated three times. The method has been validated using a wide organic matrix in several certified materials. The obtained results are given in the Supplementary Materials. Validation data for the determination of elements by this method are presented in Table 4. Due to the fact that certified reference materials (CRMs) of brain tissue are not available, the analytical method was additionally assessed by the standard additions method. ICP commercial analytical standards (Romil, Cambridge, UK) were used both for calibration and standard additions. Detection limits (DL) were determined through 3-sigma criteria and were on the level of 0.01 (mg/kg) wet weight (w/w) for all elements determined. The uncertainty for the complete analytical process (including sample preparation) was at the level of 20%. Traceability was assessed by comparison with reference materials. A recovery of 80–120% was considered acceptable for all the elements determined.

4.4. Statistical Analysis

The correlations between concentrations of individual elements in the brain were analyzed in terms of their magnitude and direction. Correlation and covariance analyses were performed. Since elemental concentrations in different areas may have an abnormal distribution, Spearman′s coefficient was used to test the correlation. Spearman’s correlation coefficients were calculated for each brain region divided into control and alcohol use disorder groups. p-values were also included in figures (numbers in brackets). Intervals for correlations in pairs of elements in two studied groups are presented in Table 3. The differences between matrices of correlations were tested with the Schott test, which is a generalization of the Box M test for homogeneity of covariance matrices. This generalization is robust for non-normality. All variables were scaled before testing, so covariance matrices turned to correlation matrices [14]. The significance level (p-value) adopted in this work is 0.05. All statistical calculations and visualizations were done in R environment (R Core Team 2019 R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) with extra packages such as ggplot2, dplyr, purrr, and ggcorrplot.

5. Conclusions

The results of this study showed a great number of correlations between different trace elements in the human brain. Statistically significant alterations were found between individuals with alcohol use disorder and the control group. More correlations were observed in the AUD group and they were stronger than those found in the controls. The knowledge of kinetics and metabolism of trace elements, as well as the impact of alcohol to this process, is essential for understanding the pathological processes and functioning of human brain tissue.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/25/2/359/s1, Table S1: Descriptive statistics. Statistics were calculated for each element by tested areas and groups (for data before logarithmic transformation). Table S2: Results of certified reference materials analysis

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.G., E.B; methodology, E.B., P.N., J.P..; software, J.P.; validation, J.P., P.N.; formal analysis, E.B.; investigation, C.G., J.L., A.B.; resources, P.N.; data curation, D.M.; writing—Original draft preparation, C.G., M.S., A.B., J.L.; writing—Review and editing, M.S., P.N., D.M.; visualization, D.M.; supervision, C.G.; project administration, C.G.; funding acquisition, E.B., P.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Please turn to the CRediT taxonomy for the term explanation. Authorship must be limited to those who have contributed substantially to the work reported.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Griffith, G.C.; Butt, E.M.; Walker, J. The inorganic element content of certain human tissues. Ann. Intern. Med. 1954, 41, 501–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Perry, H.M., Jr.; Tipton, I.H.; Schroeder, H.A.; Cook, M.J. Variability in the metal content of human organs. J. Lab. Clin Med. 1962, 60, 245–253. [Google Scholar]
  3. Tipton, I.H.; Schroeder, H.A.; Perry Jr, H.M.; Cook, M.J. Trace Elements in Human Tissue: III. Subjects from Africa, the near and Far East and Europe. Health Phys. 1965, 11, 403–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Grochowski, C.; Blicharska, E.; Baj, J.; Mierzwińska, A.; Brzozowska, K.; Forma, A.; Maciejewski, R. Serum iron, Magnesium, Copper, and Manganese Levels in Alcoholism: A Systematic Review. Molcules 2019, 24, 1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Verma, P.K.; Sharma, A.; Shankar, H.; Sharma, A.; Rao, D.N. Role of Trace Elements, Oxidative Stress and Immune System: A Triad in Premature Ovarian Failure. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2017, 184, 325–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cicero, C.E.; Mostile, G.; Vasta, R.; Rapisarda, V.; Signorelli, S.S.; Ferrante, M.; Zappia, M.; Nicoletti, A. Metals and neurodegenerative diseases. A systematic review. Environ. Res. 2017, 159, 82–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Grochowski, C.; Radzikowska, E.; Maciejewski, R. Neural stem cell therapy—Brief review. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2018, 173, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Duce, J.A.; Bush, A.I. Biological metals and Alzheimer’s disease: Implications for therapeutics and diagnostics. Prog. Neurobiol. 2010, 92, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Grochowski, C.; Litak, J.; Kulesza, B.; Szmygin, P.; Ziemianek, D.; Kamieniak, P.; Szczepanek, D.; Rola, R.; Trojanowski, T. Size and location correlations with higher rupture risk of intracranial aneurysms. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2018, 48, 181–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Grochowski, C.; Staśkiewicz, G. Ultra high field TOF-MRA: A method to visualize small cerebral vessels. 7 T TOF-MRA sequence parameters on different MRI scanners–Literature review. Neurol. Neurochir. Pol. 2017, 51, 411–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rehm, J.; Samokhvalov, A.V.; Neuman, M.G.; Room, R.; Parry, C.; Lönnroth, K.; Patra, J.; Poznyak, V.; Popova, S. The association between alcohol use, alcohol use disorders and tuberculosis (TB). A systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2009, 9, 450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Rehm, J. The risks associated with alcohol use and alcoholism. Alcohol Res Health. 2011, 34, 135–143. [Google Scholar]
  13. Dinsmore, W.W.; McMaster, D.; Callender, M.E.; Buchanan, K.D.; Love, A.H.G. Trace elements and alcohol. Sci. Total Environ. 1985, 42, 109–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Schott, J. Some Tests for the Equality of Covariance Matrices. J. Stat. Plan. Inference 2001, 94, 25–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. O’Dell, B.L. Mineral interactions relevant to nutrient requirement. J. Nutr. 1989, 119, 1832–1838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Elsenhans, B.; Schumann, K.; Forth, W. Toxic metals: Interactions with essential metals. In: Rowland IR, ed. Nutr. Toxic. Cancer. 1991, 8, 223–258. [Google Scholar]
  17. Telisman, S. Interactions of essential and/or toxic metals and metalloid regarding interindividual differences in susceptibility to various toxicants and chronic diseases in man. Arh. Hig. Rada. Toksikol. 1995, 46, 459–476. [Google Scholar]
  18. Darret, G.; Couzy, F.; Antoine, J.M.; Magliola, C.; Mareschi, J.P. Estimation of Minerals and Trace Elements Provided by Beverages for the Adult in France. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 1986, 30, 335–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhu, Y.; Chen, P.; Wan, H.; Wang, Y.; Hao, P.; Liu, Y.; Liu, J. Selenium-Chromium (VI) Interaction Regulates the Contents and Correlations of Trace Elements in Chicken Brain and Serum. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2018, 181, 154–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rahil-Khazen, R.; Bolann, B.J.; Ulvik, R.J. Correlations of trace element levels within and between different normal autopsy tissues analyzed by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES). BioMetals 2002, 15, 87–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tanaka, M.; Matsugi, E.; Miyasaki, K. PIXE measurement applied to trace elemental analysis of human tissues. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B. 1987, 22, 152–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rahil-Khazen, R.; Bolann, B.J.; Myking, A.; Ulvik, R.J. Multi-element analysis of trace element levels in human autopsy tissues by using inductively coupled atomic emission spectrometry technique (ICP-AES). J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 1987, 16, 15–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gulati, A.; Chandishwar, N.; Shanker, K.; Srimal, R.C.; Dhawan, K.N.; Bhargava, K.P. Effect of alcohols on the permeability of blood-brain barrier. Pharm. Res. Commun. 1985, 17, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Haorah, J. Alcohol-induced oxidative stress in brain endothelial cells causes blood-brain barrier dysfunction. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2005, 78, 1223–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Kornhuber, J.; Kaiserauer, C.H.; Kornhuber, A.W.; Kornhuber, M.E. Alcohol Consumption and Blood-Cerebrospinal Fluid Barrier Dysfunction in Man. Neuroscience 1987, 79, 218–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kumar, V.; Gill, K.D. Oxidative Stress and Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Aluminium Neurotoxicity and Its Amelioration: A Review. NeuroToxicology 2014, 41, 154–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Puntarulo, S. Iron, Oxidative Stress and Human Health. Mol. Aspects Med. 2005, 26, 299–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Deibel, M.; Ehmann, W.; Markesbery, W. Copper, Iron, and Zinc Imbalances in Severely Degenerated Brain Regions in Alzheimer’s Disease: Possible Relation to Oxidative Stress. J. Neurol. Sci. 1996, 143, 137–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lochhead, J.J.; McCaffrey, G.; Quigley, C.E.; Finch, J.; DeMarco, K.M.; Nametz, N.; Davis, T.P. Oxidative Stress Increases Blood–Brain Barrier Permeability and Induces Alterations in Occludin during Hypoxia–Reoxygenation. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2010, 30, 1625–1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Bolognin, S.; Messori, L.; Zatta, P. Metal Ion Physiopathology in Neurodegenerative Disorders. Neuro. Mol. Med. 2009, 11, 223–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bowman, A.B.; Kwakye, G.F.; Herrero Hernández, E.; Aschner, M. Role of Manganese in Neurodegenerative Diseases. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2011, 25, 191–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are available from the authors.
Figure 1. Correlation matrix of average brain trace element concentrations in the alcohol use disorder group and control group. The strongest relationships between average concentrations of trace elements are marked in circles.
Figure 1. Correlation matrix of average brain trace element concentrations in the alcohol use disorder group and control group. The strongest relationships between average concentrations of trace elements are marked in circles.
Molecules 25 00359 g001
Figure 2. Correlation matrix of Spearman coefficient charts in the anterior cingular cortex region in the alcohol use disorder and control groups.
Figure 2. Correlation matrix of Spearman coefficient charts in the anterior cingular cortex region in the alcohol use disorder and control groups.
Molecules 25 00359 g002
Figure 3. Correlation matrix of Spearman coefficient charts in the head of the caudate nucleus region in the alcohol use disorder and control groups.
Figure 3. Correlation matrix of Spearman coefficient charts in the head of the caudate nucleus region in the alcohol use disorder and control groups.
Molecules 25 00359 g003
Figure 4. Correlation matrix of Spearman coefficient charts in the frontal part of the thalamus region in the alcohol use disorder and control groups.
Figure 4. Correlation matrix of Spearman coefficient charts in the frontal part of the thalamus region in the alcohol use disorder and control groups.
Molecules 25 00359 g004
Figure 5. Correlation matrix of Spearman coefficient charts in the foot of the hippocampus region in the alcohol use disorder and control groups.
Figure 5. Correlation matrix of Spearman coefficient charts in the foot of the hippocampus region in the alcohol use disorder and control groups.
Molecules 25 00359 g005
Figure 6. Correlation matrix of Spearman coefficient charts in the inferior longitudinal fasciculus region in the alcohol use disorder and control groups.
Figure 6. Correlation matrix of Spearman coefficient charts in the inferior longitudinal fasciculus region in the alcohol use disorder and control groups.
Molecules 25 00359 g006
Figure 7. Correlation matrix of Spearman coefficient charts in the frontal part of the insula region in the alcohol use disorder and control groups.
Figure 7. Correlation matrix of Spearman coefficient charts in the frontal part of the insula region in the alcohol use disorder and control groups.
Molecules 25 00359 g007
Figure 8. Correlation matrix of Spearman coefficient charts in the nucleus accumbens region in the alcohol use disorder and control groups.
Figure 8. Correlation matrix of Spearman coefficient charts in the nucleus accumbens region in the alcohol use disorder and control groups.
Molecules 25 00359 g008
Figure 9. Correlation matrix of Spearman coefficient charts in the post central gyrus region in the alcohol use disorder and control groups.
Figure 9. Correlation matrix of Spearman coefficient charts in the post central gyrus region in the alcohol use disorder and control groups.
Molecules 25 00359 g009
Figure 10. Correlation matrix of Spearman coefficient charts in the frontal cortex region in the alcohol use disorder and control groups.
Figure 10. Correlation matrix of Spearman coefficient charts in the frontal cortex region in the alcohol use disorder and control groups.
Molecules 25 00359 g010
Figure 11. Correlation matrix of Spearman coefficient charts in the superior longitudinal fasciculus region in the alcohol use disorder and control groups.
Figure 11. Correlation matrix of Spearman coefficient charts in the superior longitudinal fasciculus region in the alcohol use disorder and control groups.
Molecules 25 00359 g011
Table 1. Intervals for correlations in selected pairs of elements in the two studied groups.
Table 1. Intervals for correlations in selected pairs of elements in the two studied groups.
Pair of Trace ElementsAlcohol Use
Disorder Group
Control Group
Lower BoundUpper BoundLower BoundUpper Bound
Co–Cr0.030.74−0.300.41
Co–Cu0.210.62−0.440.22
Co–Fe0.190.72−0.590.62
Co–Mn0.120.69−0.350.09
Cr–Cu0.420.740.450.67
Cr–Mn0.340.720.390.78
Cu–Fe0.670.860.460.83
Cu–Mn0.560.80.220.78
Cu–Zn0.520.84−0.100.32
Fe–Mn0.450.900.390.88
Fe–Zn0.260.970.100.56
Mn–Zn0.570.85−0.030.51
Table 2. Tests for equality of correlation coefficient matrices by Schott method.
Table 2. Tests for equality of correlation coefficient matrices by Schott method.
RegionStatisticp-value
Dorsal anterior cingular cortex56.91<0.001
The head of the caudate nucleus26.58<0.001
Frontal part of the thalamus41.46<0.001
The foot of the hippocampus27.39<0.001
Inferior longitudinal fasciculus40.44<0.001
Frontal part of the insula37.78<0.001
Nucleus accumbens38.32<0.001
Post central gyrus38.04<0.001
Frontal cortex42.20<0.001
Superior longitudinal fasciculus29.71<0.001
Total (average value)65.09<0.001
Table 3. Demographic characteristics of analyzed subjects. AUD = alcohol use disorder, SD = standard deviation.
Table 3. Demographic characteristics of analyzed subjects. AUD = alcohol use disorder, SD = standard deviation.
ParameterControl GroupAUD Groupp
Age (mean ± SD)50.3 ± 19.1 47.9 ± 13.30.41
Sex (n, %)Women: 8 (26%)
Men: 23 (74%)
Women: 10 (32%)
Men: 21 (68%)
0.58
Weight (mean ± SD)82.0 ± 20.9 81.4 ± 25.40.64
BMI (kg/m2, mean ± SD)28.5 ± 7.3 26.5 ± 7.4 0.65
Table 4. Validation data for elements determination by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES).
Table 4. Validation data for elements determination by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES).
WavelengthDLRangeUncertainty
nmmg L−1mg L−1%
Co238,8920.00029DL-201.6
Cr267,7160.00033DL-204.0
Cu327,3950.00027DL-209.6
Fe238,2040.00084DL-1001.6
Mn257,6100.00021DL-201.8
Se196,0260.0011DL-1016.4
Zn213,8570.00022DL-203.5

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Grochowski, C.; Szukała, M.; Litak, J.; Budny, A.; Proch, J.; Majerek, D.; Blicharska, E.; Niedzielski, P. Correlations Between Trace Elements in Selected Locations of the Human Brain in Individuals with Alcohol Use Disorder. Molecules 2020, 25, 359. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25020359

AMA Style

Grochowski C, Szukała M, Litak J, Budny A, Proch J, Majerek D, Blicharska E, Niedzielski P. Correlations Between Trace Elements in Selected Locations of the Human Brain in Individuals with Alcohol Use Disorder. Molecules. 2020; 25(2):359. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25020359

Chicago/Turabian Style

Grochowski, Cezary, Magdalena Szukała, Jakub Litak, Agnieszka Budny, Jędrzej Proch, Dariusz Majerek, Eliza Blicharska, and Przemysław Niedzielski. 2020. "Correlations Between Trace Elements in Selected Locations of the Human Brain in Individuals with Alcohol Use Disorder" Molecules 25, no. 2: 359. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25020359

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop