Next Article in Journal
Two-Phase Dibromocyclopropanation of Unsaturated Alcohols Using Flow Chemistry
Next Article in Special Issue
Zebrafish-Based Screening Models for the Identification of Anti-Metastatic Drugs
Previous Article in Journal
Carbonic Anhydrase-IX Guided Albumin Nanoparticles for Hypoxia-mediated Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cell Killing and Imaging of Patient-derived Tumor
Previous Article in Special Issue
Lecithin-Based Dermal Drug Delivery for Anti-Pigmentation Maize Ceramide
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 25
Issue 10
10.3390/molecules25102361
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Protective Effects of Fucoidan Isolated from Celluclast-Assisted Extract of Undaria pinnatifida Sporophylls against AAPH-Induced Oxidative Stress In Vitro and In Vivo Zebrafish Model

by
Jae-Young Oh
1,
Eun-A Kim
2,
Sang In Kang
3,
Hye-Won Yang
1,
Bomi Ryu
1,
Lei Wang
4,
Jung-Suck Lee
5,* and
You-Jin Jeon
1,3,*
1
Department of Marine Life Science, Jeju National University, Jeju City 63243, Korea
2
Jeju International Marine Science Center for Research & Education, Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology, Jeju City 63349, Korea
3
Department of Seafood and Aquaculture Science, Gyeongsang National University, Tongyeong 53064, Korea
4
Marine Science Institute, Jeju National University, Jeju City 63333, Korea
5
Research Center for Industrial Development of Seafood, Gyeongsang National University, Tongyeong 53064, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2020, 25(10), 2361; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25102361
Submission received: 17 April 2020 / Revised: 15 May 2020 / Accepted: 15 May 2020 / Published: 19 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Zebrafish-Based Drug Screening)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Fucoidan is a fucose-enriched polysaccharide, obtained from brown algae, with demonstrated antioxidant properties. However, traditional extraction methods using water or chemical-based extraction methods have reduced yield and produced hazardous by-products. In this study, we isolated fucoidan at a high yield using enzyme-assisted extraction; the Celluclast enzyme assisted extract of Undaria pinnatifida sporophylls (FCUS). To examine the antioxidant properties of FCUS, oxidative stress was induced with 2,2′-azobis (2-methylpropionamidine) dihydrochloride (AAPH) in Vero cells and zebrafish model. FCUS was composed of 30.4% sulfate and 52.3% fucose. Pre-treatment of Vero cells with FCUS dose dependently inhibited AAPH-induced reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. Moreover, FCUS remarkably reduced cell death, ROS generation, and lipid peroxidation production in zebrafish larvae. Overall, these findings indicate that the sulfate-rich fucoidan of FCUS, obtained with an eco-friendly process, could be implemented as a beneficial antioxidant agent in the functional food industry.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Zebrafish (Danio rerio) are vertebrates that have special advantages over other experimental animal models, due to their smaller size, high breeding capacity, and short life cycle [1]. The zebrafish model has already been explored for drug screening and toxicology involving a variety of transgenic and wild type models due to its specificity.
Zebrafish larvae are transparent in nature. This facilitates the examination of different body parts and organs, such as bones, blood vessels, and different tissues like nerves. Hence, zebrafish is a handy and practical in vivo model for a variety of applications, including functional studies of food ingredients [2].
Generally, seaweeds contain about 90% water, and the other components include carbohydrates, proteins, and trace amounts of polyphenols and sterols. Raw materials (prior to extraction) contain fewer quantities of functional components per unit weight; therefore, for product development, extraction and purification of these raw materials are required to increase their efficacy. Enzymatic hydrolysis or enzyme-assisted extraction methods can destroy the cell membrane [3], facilitating the isolation of functional components at high yields. Celluclast is an enzyme obtained from Trichoderma resei, and it efficiently hydrolyzes cellulose to glucose. In general, Celluclast is used to break down cellulosic material for the production of fermentable sugars. Simultaneously, this results in the reduction of viscosity and increased extraction yield of plant materials [4,5,6].
Fucoidan is a fucose-containing sulfated polysaccharide in brown algae (Phaeophyceae), comprising l-fucose as the main sugar, along with galactose, glucose, mannose, and sulfate ester groups [5,7,8,9]. Previous studies demonstrated that fucoidan possesses a wide range of biological activities, such as anti-tumor, antioxidant, anti-diabetes, anti-inflammatory, and immunomodulatory effects [2,10,11,12,13]. Fucoidan is typically extracted using hot water and acidic water using HCl as a solvent [6,14]. However, the extraction process involving water and organic solvents is time-consuming and results in the release of some toxic compounds to the environment [15,16]. Therefore, the present study aims to develop a more environment friendly extraction method of fucoidan without releasing toxins while achieving a high yield and good quality of sulfate and fucose contents.
Enzyme-assisted extraction methods emerged as more eco-friendly extraction technologies, with relatively lower energy consumption and high yields of materials, such as polysaccharides, proteins, oils, and natural pigments [15,17]. Therefore, these methods were applied for the safe extraction and isolation of bioactive metabolites from seaweeds for food applications [15].
Undaria pinnatifida sporophylls, known as “Miyeokgwi” in Korea, have traditionally been considered as derelict by-products of Undaria pinnatifida leaves that are generally dumped at sea. However, many studies have reported various bioactivities of fucoidan isolated from U. pinnatifida, including anti-tumor, immune-stimulatory, anti-viral, and anti-coagulant activities [18]. Therefore, the value of fucoidan derived from U. pinnatifida is increasingly being recognized as a food and functional ingredient.
To improve its production, in the present study, we isolated fucoidan from U. pinnatifida sporophylls using an enzyme-assisted extraction method with Celluclast and measured its antioxidant activity using Vero cells and zebrafish larvae as in vitro and in vivo models, respectively, of oxidative stress induced by 2,2′-azobis (2-methylpropionamidine) dihydrochloride (AAPH).

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Proximate Composition of the FCUS

The composition of FCUS is summarized in Table 1. FCUS contained 66.8% carbohydrates and 2.8% protein of the total dry weight. The monosaccharide composition analysis showed that fucose (52.3%) and galactose (44.5%) are the major sugars in FCUS. Besides, FCUS contained 30.4% sulfate. Therefore, the fucoidan content of FCUS was approximately 97% of the total dry carbohydrate content. Fucoidan is a sulfated polysaccharide derived from brown seaweed. It was enriched in l-fucose and sulfate ester groups and possesses demonstrated antioxidant activity [19]. To overcome the limitations and disadvantages of the conventional extraction of fucoidan using hot water, organic solvents, or acid solvents, we demonstrated the feasibility of adopted of enzymatic hydrolysis with Celluclast enzymes to extract fucoidan from sporophylls of the brown algae, U. pinnatifida.
The use of an enzyme-assisted extraction method has a substantial advantage for achieving high extraction yields for compounds, along with being an eco-friendly process with higher recovery, reduced solvent usage, and lower energy consumption, compared to non-enzymatic extraction methods [15]. Therefore, enzyme-assisted extraction methods have been widely used to obtain functional materials, such as oils, peptides, polysaccharides, and pigments [20,21,22,23]. Commercial fucoidan prepared from Fucus vesiculosus is mainly composed of fucose (44.1%) and sulfate (26.3%) [24]. Fucoidan previously isolated from Miyeokgwi, using HCl as the solvent, was obtained with a yield of only 4.9%, comprising of 28.9% sulfate and 50.9% or 53% fucose [25]. In this study, however, FCUS accounted for approximately 97.2% fucoidan content in the carbohydrate content, 6.2% yield, comprising 30.4% sulfate and 52.3% fucose, demonstrating improvement over both the commercial fucoidan and HCl extract. Accordingly, hydrolyzed U. pinnatifida sporophylls using Celluclast enzyme-assisted extraction is a safe and eco-friendly extraction method, resulting in high contents of sulfate and fucose.
The FT-IR spectrum was recorded in the range of 600–2000 cm−1 to analyze the structural features of FCUS, such as glycosidic bonds and functional groups, which were compared to those of the commercial fucoidan (Figure 1). An intense peak centering at 840 and 1035 cm−1 indicated sulfation on C4 galactose and the stretching vibration of the glycoside bridge (C–O–C) [26]. The bands at 1135 and 1160 cm−1 represent stretching vibrations of the glycosidic C–O group and the aliphatic C=O bond, respectively [27]. The bands around 1220–1270 cm−1 suggest sulfate groups (O=S=O stretching), and that at 1710 cm−1 indicated a stretching vibration of the carbonyl groups in the carboxylic acid groups (C–O) of fucoidan [27]. FCUS showed a strong band at five peaks (840, 1035, 1220–1270, 1160, and 1710 cm−1), demonstrating a similar pattern to that of the commercial fucoidan.

2.2. Effect of FCUS on Intracellular ROS Generation in AAPH-Stimulated Vero Cells

Oxidative stress is associated with aging and inflammation, as well as several human diseases, such as Parkinson’s disease, rheumatoid arthritis, neurological disorder, and Alzheimer’s disease [28,29,30]. Commonly, ROS produced as a result of normal metabolism is eliminated by the endogenous cellular antioxidant system. However, elevated and abnormal levels of ROS have detrimental effects. External antioxidants would help to protect against cellular and tissue damage induced by excessive ROS production. Recently, natural antioxidants have been developed, and we have explored various natural antioxidants from marine organisms, especially algae [31,32]. External stimuli, such as drugs, radiation, and dust, could induce abnormal ROS production [33]. Therefore, remarkable ROS scavenging activity and low and non-toxic substances may be the ideal features for protection against and treatment of oxidative stress-related human diseases. According to previous studies, sulfated polysaccharides derived from seaweeds have potent antioxidant activity [34,35]. As noted above, FCUS contained high amounts of sulfated polysaccharides (66.8 ± 0.1%) and antioxidative monosaccharides, such as fucose and galactose.
The MTT assay showed that FCUS did not have any cytotoxicity at the tested concentrations (62.5–250 µg/mL) compared with the control (Figure 2a). Therefore, further experiments were carried out using FCUS at concentrations lower than 250 µg/mL. We next measured the peroxyl radical scavenging activity to evaluate the intracellular ROS scavenging effects of FCUS against AAPH-induced oxidative stress in Vero cells. AAPH, a water-soluble azo compound, is commonly referred to as a free radical inducer and has been used in many studies on lipid peroxidation and characterization of antioxidants. As shown in Figure 2b, the ROS production was remarkably increased in the AAPH-treated group. However, the intracellular ROS production of cells treated with FCUS at 62.5, 125, and 250 µg/mL decreased in a dose-dependent manner (52%, 48%, and 36%, respectively).

2.3. Toxicity of FCUS in Zebrafish and the Effect of FCUS on ROS and Lipid Peroxidation Production in Zebrafish

Zebrafish is a valuable in vivo model for various oxidative stress assays and is used in studies of oxidative stress or protection against oxidative stress [36]. Oxidative stress, induced by AAPH and H2O2 could lead to elevation of heartbeat rate, ROS levels, lipid peroxidation, and cell death, as well as decrease the rate of survival, in zebrafish [36,37,38]. A previous study confirmed the antioxidant effects of fucoidan derived from Ecklonia cava (containing 51.8% carbohydrate, 20.1% sulfate, and 61.1% fucose) against AAPH-induced oxidative stress in the zebrafish model. It also improved survival rate and decreased heartbeat rate, production of ROS and lipid peroxidation, and cell death [13,39]. Consequently, AAPH-treated zebrafish were used as the model to determine the antioxidant effect of FCUS.
The survival rate of zebrafish embryos was reduced to 84% in the AAPH-treated group, compared with that of the control group. However, the FCUS-treated groups (62.5–250 µg/mL) showed a significant increase in survival rates compared to the non-treated group, to 88%, 94%, and 95%, respectively (Figure 3a). The heartbeat rate of the AAPH-treated group increased to 114% compared with that of control group, and was significantly reduced with pre-treatment of FCUS at the concentrations of 62.5–250 µg/mL (Figure 3b).
Exposure of zebrafish larvae to AAPH resulted in a 150% increase in the ROS level, but it was decreased to 5%, 37%, and 57% with FCUS treatments at 62.5, 125, and 250 µg/mL, respectively (Figure 3c). Similarly, the AAPH-treated group showed a 150% increase in lipid peroxidation determined by the fluorescence of DPPP. However, the treatments with FCUS (62.5, 125, and 250 µg/mL) significantly suppressed the lipid peroxidation production and cell death in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 3d). Moreover, AAPH treatment significantly increased the cell death level to 33% compared with that of the control group, but it was decreased in a dose-dependent manner by FCUS treatments to 34%, 28%, and 23% at 62.5, 125, and 250 µg/mL, respectively (Figure 3e). AAPH is well known to strongly induce lipid peroxidation in membranes, resulting in viability reduction and up-regulated ROS generation [40,41]. In addition, the fucoidans isolated from Luminaria japonica, Undaria pinnatifida, Ecklonia stolonifera, and Ecklonia cava also showed antioxidant activities [13,42,43,44]. Yang et al [25] reported that fucoidan isolated from U. pinnatifida sporophylls with HCl solvent-assisted extraction had a protective effect against AAPH-induced oxidative stress, however, FUCS showed stronger antioxidant activity both in vitro and in vivo. FCUS also significantly suppressed the lipid peroxidation induced by AAPH. ROS includes several molecules that damage the structure of DNA and RNA, as well as oxidizes proteins and lipids to induce oxidative stress [45,46,47].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Material

Sporophylls of the brown algae U. pinnatifida were obtained from the seaweed-processing factory in Wando, South of Korea. Impurities were removed using tap water, and the samples were subjected to freeze-drying and stored at −40 °C. Trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) of analytical grade (Dae-Jung Chemicals & Metals Co., Seoul, Korea) was used for the monosaccharide compositional analysis and 97% ethanol (Dae-Jung Chemicals & Metals Co., Seoul, Korea) was used for extraction. Celluclast was purchased from Novo Nordisk (Bagsvaerd, Denmark). 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), and AAPH were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). All other chemicals and reagents used in these experiments were of analytical grade.

3.2. Extraction and Purification of Fucoidan from U. pinnatifida Sporophylls

For enzyme-assisted extraction, 100 g of the dried U. pinnatifida sporophylls powder was mixed with 2 L of distilled water (dH2O) and 0.5 mL of Celluclast enzyme for 24 h in a shaking incubator (140 rpm at 50 °C). The digested material was heated at 95 °C (10 min) for enzyme inactivation. The supernatants were separated from the debris by centrifugation (3500 rpm for 20 min) following filtration. For precipitation, the hydrolysate was mixed with a 3-fold volume of ethanol (95% ethanol) and allowed to precipitate the polysaccharides overnight. After centrifugation (10,000 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C), the precipitates were dissolved in dH2O and subsequently treated with 4 M CaCl2 for 4 h to remove alginic acid interferences. The precipitate was removed in an additional centrifugation step (10,000 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C) and re-treated with three volumes of ethanol. The resulting precipitate was freeze-dried and used as the fucoidan isolated from the Celluclast enzyme extract of U. pinnatifida sporophylls (FCUS).

3.3. Characterization of FCUS

3.3.1. Proximate Composition and Monosaccharide Composition

The total carbohydrate content of FCUS was analyzed by the phenol-sulfuric acid method [48] using glucose as a standard, and the protein content was analyzed by the Lowry method [49]. The sulfate content was analyzed by the BaCl2 gelatin method [50]. The monosaccharide composition of FCUS was analyzed according to the method described by Yang et al [25]. Briefly, FCUS was hydrolyzed using 4 M of TFA. The hydrolysate was analyzed using a Dionex ED50 Electrochemical Detector (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with a CarboPac PA1 Cartridge column (4.5 mm × 50 mm, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Sodium hydroxide (16 mM) was used as a mobile phase with a flow rate of 1 mL/min.

3.3.2. Fourier Transform-Infrared (FT-IR) Characterization

The FCUS and commercial fucoidan (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were analyzed by the Potassium bromide (KBr) method using an FT-IR spectrometer (Nicole 6700, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), following the experimental conditions described in Fernando et al [27]. Commercial fucoidan used as a control was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).

3.4. Cell culture and cell experiments

The Vero cell line (African green monkey kidney, KCKB No. 10081) was cultured in RPMI-1640 (Invitrogen-Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) medium containing penicillin (100 U/mL), streptomycin (100 μg/mL), and 10% FBS (Invitrogen-Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA). The cells were maintained in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37°C. For the measurement of reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and cell viability, Vero cells were seeded in 96-well plates at 1 × 105 cells/mL for 16 h. The cells were treated with various concentrations of FCUS. After 24 h, cell viability was measured by MTT assay, as reported by Wang et al. [51], and intracellular ROS production was measured using DCF-DA assay, according to Wang et al. [51].

3.5. In Vivo Experiments

3.5.1. Maintenance of Zebrafish

Zebrafish (Danio rerio) were purchased from a commercial aquarium (Jeju, Korea) and maintenance conditions were followed, as described by Kim et al [13]. Males (2) were bred with females (1) to obtain embryos, and the embryos were harvested the next morning. The harvesting method that followed was natural spawning within 30 minutes in a cell culture dish containing an embryo medium [13].

3.5.2. Treatment of FCUS and AAPH to Embryos

After 8 h post fertilization, fifteen embryos were transferred to wells of a 12-well plate with embryo medium. FCUS was administered to the embryos for 1 h, and then the embryos were treated with 15 mM AAPH for 24 h. The survival rate of the embryo was observed for 7 days post-fertilization (dpf), and the heartbeat was observed at 2 dpf for 1 min using a microscope.

3.5.3. Measurement of Intracellular ROS Production, Lipid Peroxidation, and Cell Death Induced by AAPH

For measurement of antioxidant activities in the zebrafish, the embryos (3 dpf) were transferred to a 12-well plate. The embryos were treated with DCFH-DA (20 μg/mL), and incubated in the dark room for 1 h at room temperature for ROS measurement. The embryos were washed using fresh medium and anesthetized using Ethyl 3-aminobenzoate methanesulfonate (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Luis, MO, USA) before observation. We placed each anesthetized larva on the slide glass, and fluorescence values were measured using a fluorescence microscope. The differences in the fluorescence intensities of the groups were noted by keeping the value of the control group fixed as the index for the comparisons. Lipid peroxidation was measured by treatment with diphenyl-1-pyrenylphosphine (DPPP, Thermo Scientific, USA). Similarly, embryos in the well plates were treated with DPPP (25 μg/mL) and incubated. Washing and anesthetizing was carried out, as mentioned above. Cell death was measured by treatment with acridine orange (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), (7 μg/mL). The observation of zebrafish was conducted using Cool SNAP-Pro color digital camera (Olympus, Japan) according to Kim et al [13]. The fluorescence intensities of the zebrafish larvae were quantified using Image J (Version 1.51) program.

3.6. Statistical Analysis

All the experiments were performed in triplicate, and the data are expressed as the mean ± standard error (SE). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (SPSS 11.5 statistical software) was performed to compare the mean values among treatment groups.

4. Conclusions

FCUS was found to be enriched in fucose and sulfate, with a prominent antioxidant effect exerted through repression of AAPH-induced ROS generation in vitro and in vivo. Thus, with further investigation into the safety and eco-friendly extraction process, FCUS has the potential to be developed as a beneficial antioxidant or nutraceutical functional ingredient, and as an alternative treatment for oxidative damage.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.-Y.O. and J.-S.L.; Data curation, H.-W.Y.; Formal analysis, J.-Y.O., E.-A.K., S.I.K., H.-W.Y. and B.R.; Investigation, J.-Y.O.; Methodology, L.W. and J.-S.L.; Project administration, Y.-J.J.; Resources, S.I.K., B.R. and L.W.; Software, E.-A.K. and H.-W.Y.; Supervision, Y.-J.J.; Writing-original draft, J.-Y.O.; Writing-review & editing, Y.-J.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Education (2019R1A6A1A03033553).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kishi, S.; Uchiyama, J.; Baughman, A.M.; Goto, T.; Lin, M.C.; Tsai, S.B. The zebrafish as a vertebrate model of functional aging and very gradual senescence. Exp. Gerontol. 2003, 38, 777–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lee, S.H.; Ko, C.I.; Jee, Y.; Jeong, Y.; Kim, M.; Kim, J.S.; Jeon, Y.J. Anti-inflammatory effect of fucoidan extracted from Ecklonia cava in zebrafish model. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 92, 84–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Heo, S.-J.; Park, E.-J.; Lee, K.-W.; Jeon, Y.-J. Antioxidant activities of enzymatic extracts from brown seaweeds. Bioresource Technol. 2005, 96, 1613–1623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Merino, S.T.; Cherry, J. Progress and challenges in enzyme development for biomass utilization. In Biofuels; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2007; pp. 95–120. [Google Scholar]
  5. Synytsya, A.; Kim, W.J.; Kim, S.M.; Pohl, R.; Synytsya, A.; Kvasnicka, F.; Copikova, J.; Park, Y.I. Structure and antitumour activity of fucoidan isolated from sporophyll of Korean brown seaweed Undaria pinnatifida. Carbohydr. Polym. 2010, 81, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Koo, J.-G.; Choi, Y.-S.; Kwak, J.-K. Blood-anticoagulant activity of fucoidans from sporophylls of Undaria pinnatifida, Laminaria religiosa, Hizikia fusiforme and Sargassum fulvellum in Korea. Korean J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2001, 34, 515–520. [Google Scholar]
  7. Jiang, Z.D.; Okimura, T.; Yokose, T.; Yamasaki, Y.; Yamaguchi, K.; Oda, T. Effects of sulfated fucan, ascophyllan, from the brown Alga Ascophyllum nodosum on various cell lines: A comparative study on ascophyllan and fucoidan. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2010, 110, 113–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Li, B.; Lu, F.; Wei, X.; Zhao, R. Fucoidan: Structure and bioactivity. Molecules 2008, 13, 1671–1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Lim, S.J.; Aida, W.M.W.; Maskat, M.Y.; Mamot, S.; Ropien, J.; Mohd, D.M. Isolation and antioxidant capacity of fucoidan from selected Malaysian seaweeds. Food Hydrocolloid. 2014, 42, 280–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Boo, H.J.; Hyun, J.H.; Kim, S.C.; Kang, J.I.; Kim, M.K.; Kim, S.Y.; Cho, H.; Yoo, E.S.; Kang, H.K. Fucoidan from Undaria pinnatifida induces apoptosis in A549 human lung carcinoma cells. Phytother. Res. 2011, 25, 1082–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kim, M.J.; Jeon, J.; Lee, J.S. Fucoidan prevents high-fat diet-induced obesity in animals by suppression of fat accumulation. Phytother. Res. 2014, 28, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mak, W.; Hamid, N.; Liu, T.; Lu, J.; White, W.L. Fucoidan from New Zealand Undaria pinnatifida: Monthly variations and determination of antioxidant activities. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 95, 606–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kim, E.A.; Lee, S.H.; Ko, C.I.; Cha, S.H.; Kang, M.C.; Kang, S.M.; Ko, S.C.; Lee, W.W.; Ko, J.Y.; Lee, J.H.; et al. Protective effect of fucoidan against AAPH-induced oxidative stress in zebrafish model. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 102, 185–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lee, J.B.; Hayashi, K.; Hashimoto, M.; Nakano, T.; Hayashi, T. Novel antiviral fucoidan from sporophyll of Undaria pinnatifida (Mekabu). Chem. Pharm. Bull. (Tokyo) 2004, 52, 1091–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Puri, M.; Sharma, D.; Barrow, C.J. Enzyme-assisted extraction of bioactives from plants. Trends Biotechnol. 2012, 30, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Teo, C.C.; Tan, S.N.; Yong, J.W.; Hew, C.S.; Ong, E.S. Pressurized hot water extraction (PHWE). J. Chromatogr. A 2010, 1217, 2484–2494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sanjeewa, K.K.A.; Lee, J.S.; Kim, W.S.; Jeon, Y.J. The potential of brown-algae polysaccharides for the development of anticancer agents: An update on anticancer effects reported for fucoidan and laminaran. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 177, 451–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Maruyama, H.; Tamauchi, H.; Hashimoto, M.; Nakano, T. Antitumor activity and immune response of Mekabu fucoidan extracted from Sporophyll of Undaria pinnatifida. In Vivo 2003, 17, 245–249. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wijesinghe, W.A.J.P.; Jeon, Y.J. Biological activities and potential industrial applications of fucose rich sulfated polysaccharides and fucoidans isolated from brown seaweeds: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 88, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Maier, T.; Schieber, A.; Kammerer, D.R.; Carle, R. Residues of grape (Vitis vinifera L.) seed oil production as a valuable source of phenolic antioxidants. Food Chem. 2009, 112, 551–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kang, M.C.; Kim, S.Y.; Kim, Y.T.; Kim, E.A.; Lee, S.H.; Ko, S.C.; Wijesinghe, W.A.; Samarakoon, K.W.; Kim, Y.S.; Cho, J.H.; et al. In vitro and in vivo antioxidant activities of polysaccharide purified from aloe vera (Aloe barbadensis) gel. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 99, 365–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ko, S.C.; Kang, N.; Kim, E.A.; Kang, M.C.; Lee, S.H.; Kang, S.M.; Lee, J.B.; Jeon, B.T.; Kim, S.K.; Park, S.J.; et al. A novel angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory peptide from a marine Chlorella ellipsoidea and its antihypertensive effect in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Process Biochem. 2012, 47, 2005–2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Heo, S.J.; Park, P.J.; Park, E.J.; Kim, S.K.; Jeon, Y.J. Antioxidant activity of enzymatic extracts from a brown seaweed Ecklonia cava by electron spin resonance spectrometry and comet assay. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2005, 221, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Nishino, T.; Nishioka, C.; Ura, H.; Nagumo, T. Isolation and partial characterization of a noval amino sugar-containing fucan sulfate from commercial Fucus vesiculosus fucoidan. Carbohydr. Res. 1994, 255, 213–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yang, H.W.; Oh, J.Y.; Kim, E.A.; Kim, S.Y.; Kim, J.I.; Jeon, Y.J. Antioxidant Effect of Fucoidan from Miyeokgui, Marine Alga in Zebrafish Model. Journal of chitin and chitosan 2015, 20, 123–130. [Google Scholar]
  26. Patankar, M.S.; Oehninger, S.; Barnett, T.; Williams, R.L.; Clark, G.F. A Revised Structure for Fucoidan May Explain Some of Its Biological-Activities. J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268, 21770–21776. [Google Scholar]
  27. Fernando, I.P.S.; Sanjeewa, K.K.A.; Samarakoon, K.W.; Lee, W.W.; Kim, H.S.; Kang, N.; Ranasinghe, P.; Lee, H.S.; Jeon, Y.J. A fucoidan fraction purified from Chnoospora minima; a potential inhibitor of LPS-induced inflammatory responses. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 104, 1185–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fernando, I.P.S.; Sanjeewa, K.K.A.; Samarakoon, K.W.; Lee, W.W.; Kim, H.S.; Kim, E.A.; Gunasekara, U.K.D.S.S.; Abeytunga, D.T.U.; Nanayakkara, C.; De Silva, E.D.; et al. FTIR characterization and antioxidant activity of water soluble crude polysaccharides of Sri Lankan marine algae. Algae-Seoul 2017, 32, 75–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Kang, N.; Kim, S.-Y.; Rho, S.; Ko, J.-Y.; Jeon, Y.-J. Anti-fatigue activity of a mixture of seahorse (Hippocampus abdominalis) hydrolysate and red ginseng. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2017, 20, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Kim, H.-H.; Kim, H.-S.; Ko, J.-Y.; Kim, C.-Y.; Lee, J.-H.; Jeon, Y.-J. A single-step isolation of useful antioxidant compounds from Ishige okamurae by using centrifugal partition chromatography. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2016, 19, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Wang, L.; Jo, M.J.; Katagiri, R.; Harata, K.; Ohta, M.; Ogawa, A.; Kamegai, M.; Ishida, Y.; Tanoue, S.; Kimura, S.; et al. Antioxidant effects of citrus pomace extracts processed by super-heated steam. Lwt-Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 90, 331–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Fernando, I.P.; Kim, M.; Son, K.T.; Jeong, Y.; Jeon, Y.J. Antioxidant Activity of Marine Algal Polyphenolic Compounds: A Mechanistic Approach. J. Med. Food 2016, 19, 615–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kim, Y.S.; Hwang, J.W.; Sung, S.H.; Jeon, Y.J.; Jeong, J.H.; Jeon, B.T.; Moon, S.H.; Park, P.J. Antioxidant activity and protective effect of extract of Celosia cristata L. flower on tert-butyl hydroperoxide-induced oxidative hepatotoxicity. Food Chem. 2015, 168, 572–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Qi, H.M.; Zhao, T.T.; Zhang, Q.B.; Li, Z.; Zhao, Z.Q.; Xing, R. Antioxidant activity of different molecular weight sulfated polysaccharides from Ulva pertusa Kjellm (Chlorophyta). J. Appl. Phycol. 2005, 17, 527–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Costa, L.S.; Fidelis, G.P.; Cordeiro, S.L.; Oliveira, R.M.; Sabry, D.A.; Camara, R.B.; Nobre, L.T.; Costa, M.S.; Almeida-Lima, J.; Farias, E.H.; et al. Biological activities of sulfated polysaccharides from tropical seaweeds. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2010, 64, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mugoni, V.; Camporeale, A.; Santoro, M.M. Analysis of oxidative stress in zebrafish embryos. J. Vis. Exp. 2014, e51328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Kang, M.C.; Cha, S.H.; Wijesinghe, W.A.; Kang, S.M.; Lee, S.H.; Kim, E.A.; Song, C.B.; Jeon, Y.J. Protective effect of marine algae phlorotannins against AAPH-induced oxidative stress in zebrafish embryo. Food Chem. 2013, 138, 950–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cho, S.H.; Heo, S.J.; Yang, H.W.; Ko, E.Y.; Jung, M.S.; Cha, S.H.; Ahn, G.; Jeon, Y.J.; Kim, K.N. Protective Effect of 3-Bromo-4,5-Dihydroxybenzaldehyde from Polysiphonia morrowii Harvey against Hydrogen Peroxide-Induced Oxidative Stress In Vitro and In Vivo. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 29, 1193–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lee, S.H.; Ko, C.I.; Ahn, G.; You, S.; Kim, J.S.; Heu, M.S.; Kim, J.; Jee, Y.; Jeon, Y.J. Molecular characteristics and anti-inflammatory activity of the fucoidan extracted from Ecklonia cava. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 89, 599–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Park, J.E.; Yang, J.H.; Yoon, S.J.; Lee, J.H.; Yang, E.S.; Park, J.W. Lipid peroxidation-mediated cytotoxicity and DNA damage in U937 cells. Biochimie 2002, 84, 1199–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Socrier, L.; Rosselin, M.; Giraldo, A.M.G.; Chantemargue, B.; Di Meo, F.; Trouillas, P.; Durand, G.; Morandat, S. A Novel Nitrone-Trolox Conjugate Inhibits Membrane Lipid Oxidation Through Synergistic Antioxidant Effects. Biophys. J. 2019, 116, 227a. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Wang, J.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Song, H.; Li, P. Potential antioxidant and anticoagulant capacity of low molecular weight fucoidan fractions extracted from Laminaria japonica. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2010, 46, 6–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Li, L.H.; Xue, C.H.; Xue, Y.; Li, Z.J.; Fu, X.Y. The effects of fucoidans from Laminaria japonica on AAPH mediated oxidation of human low-density lipoprotein. Acta Oceanol. Sin. 2006, 25, 124–130. [Google Scholar]
  44. Kuda, T.; Kunii, T.; Goto, H.; Suzuki, T.; Yano, T. Varieties of antioxidant and antibacterial properties of Ecklonia stolonifera and Ecklonia kurome products harvested and processed in the Noto Peninsula, Japan. Food Chem. 2007, 103, 900–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wu, D.; Yotnda, P. Production and detection of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in cancers. J. Vis. Exp. 2011, e3357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Papaharalambus, C.A.; Griendling, K.K. Basic mechanisms of oxidative stress and reactive oxygen species in cardiovascular injury. Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 2007, 17, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Blagosklonny, M.V. Aging: ROS or TOR. Cell Cycle 2008, 7, 3344–3354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Dubois, M.; Gilles, K.A.; Hamilton, J.K.; Rebers, P.; Smith, F. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal. Chem. 1956, 28, 350–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lowry, O.H.; Rosebrough, N.J.; Farr, A.L.; Randall, R.J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 1951, 193, 265–275. [Google Scholar]
  50. Dodgson, K.S.; Price, R.G. A note on the determination of the ester sulphate content of sulphated polysaccharides. Biochem. J. 1962, 84, 106–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Wang, L.; Ryu, B.; Kim, W.S.; Kim, G.H.; Jeon, Y.J. Protective effect of gallic acid derivatives from the freshwater green alga Spirogyra sp against ultraviolet B-induced apoptosis through reactive oxygen species clearance in human keratinocytes and zebrafish. Algae 2017, 32, 379–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.
Molecules 25 02361 g001 550
Figure 1. FT-IR spectra of FCUS and standard commercial fucoidan. FCUS and standard fucoidan were scanned between 600–2000 cm−1.
Figure 1. FT-IR spectra of FCUS and standard commercial fucoidan. FCUS and standard fucoidan were scanned between 600–2000 cm−1.
Molecules 25 02361 g001
Molecules 25 02361 g002 550
Figure 2. Cytotoxicity (a) and intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging activity (b) of FCUS in Vero cells. Each value is expressed as the mean ± SE. a–d Means not sharing a common letter are significantly different between groups (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Cytotoxicity (a) and intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging activity (b) of FCUS in Vero cells. Each value is expressed as the mean ± SE. a–d Means not sharing a common letter are significantly different between groups (p < 0.05).
Molecules 25 02361 g002
Molecules 25 02361 g003 550
Figure 3. Effects of FCUS on the survival rate (a), heartbeat rate (b), reactive oxygen species (ROS) production (c), lipid peroxidation production (d), and cell death (e) in AAPH-treated zebrafish. Production of ROS, lipid peroxidation, and cell death were measured by fluorescence microscopy and analyzed using ImageJ software. Each value is expressed as the mean ± SE. a–d Means not sharing a common letter are significantly different between groups (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Effects of FCUS on the survival rate (a), heartbeat rate (b), reactive oxygen species (ROS) production (c), lipid peroxidation production (d), and cell death (e) in AAPH-treated zebrafish. Production of ROS, lipid peroxidation, and cell death were measured by fluorescence microscopy and analyzed using ImageJ software. Each value is expressed as the mean ± SE. a–d Means not sharing a common letter are significantly different between groups (p < 0.05).
Molecules 25 02361 g003
Table
Table 1. Yield, proximate chemical composition, and monosaccharide compositions of the celluclast enzyme extract of U. pinnatifida sporophylls (FCUS).
Table 1. Yield, proximate chemical composition, and monosaccharide compositions of the celluclast enzyme extract of U. pinnatifida sporophylls (FCUS).
(Dry Base, %)
Yield6.2 ± 1.2
Carbohydrate content66.8 ± 0.1
Protein content2.8 ± 0.1
Sulfate content30.4 ± 0.1
Proportion of monosaccharide
Fucose52.3 ± 0.92
Galactose44.5 ± 0.16
Glucose1.0 ± 0.01
Mannose2.2 ± 0.02
Experiments were performed in triplicate, and the data are expressed as mean ± SE.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Oh, J.-Y.; Kim, E.-A.; Kang, S.I.; Yang, H.-W.; Ryu, B.; Wang, L.; Lee, J.-S.; Jeon, Y.-J. Protective Effects of Fucoidan Isolated from Celluclast-Assisted Extract of Undaria pinnatifida Sporophylls against AAPH-Induced Oxidative Stress In Vitro and In Vivo Zebrafish Model. Molecules 2020, 25, 2361. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25102361

AMA Style

Oh J-Y, Kim E-A, Kang SI, Yang H-W, Ryu B, Wang L, Lee J-S, Jeon Y-J. Protective Effects of Fucoidan Isolated from Celluclast-Assisted Extract of Undaria pinnatifida Sporophylls against AAPH-Induced Oxidative Stress In Vitro and In Vivo Zebrafish Model. Molecules. 2020; 25(10):2361. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25102361

Chicago/Turabian Style

Oh, Jae-Young, Eun-A Kim, Sang In Kang, Hye-Won Yang, Bomi Ryu, Lei Wang, Jung-Suck Lee, and You-Jin Jeon. 2020. "Protective Effects of Fucoidan Isolated from Celluclast-Assisted Extract of Undaria pinnatifida Sporophylls against AAPH-Induced Oxidative Stress In Vitro and In Vivo Zebrafish Model" Molecules 25, no. 10: 2361. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25102361

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop