Next Article in Journal
Recycled Polyethylene/Paraffin Wax/Expanded Graphite Based Heat Absorbers for Thermal Energy Storage: An Artificial Aging Study
Next Article in Special Issue
MCR Scaffolds Get Hotter with 18F-Labeling
Previous Article in Journal
Synthetic Peptide Purification via Solid-Phase Extraction with Gradient Elution: A Simple, Economical, Fast, and Efficient Methodology
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Simple and Efficient Synthesis of Highly Substituted Indeno[1,2-b]pyrrole and Acenaphtho[1,2-b]pyrrole Derivatives by Tandem Three-Component Reactions
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 24
Issue 7
10.3390/molecules24071216
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Asymmetric A3(Aldehyde–Alkyne–Amine) Coupling: Highly Enantioselective Access to Propargylamines

by
Jia-Nan Mo
,
Junqi Su
and
Jiannan Zhao
*
Zhang Dayu School of Chemistry, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2019, 24(7), 1216; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24071216
Submission received: 28 February 2019 / Revised: 22 March 2019 / Accepted: 27 March 2019 / Published: 28 March 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Multicomponent Reactions)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

The recent developments in asymmetric A3 (aldehyde–alkyne–amine) coupling has been summarized in this review. Several interesting modifications of the ligands enabled the highly enantioselective synthesis of chiral propargylamines, which are further used in the construction of nitrogen-containing chiral building blocks.

1. Introduction

Multicomponent reactions (MCRs), defined as one-pot processes in which three or more accessible starting materials are incorporated into a single product without isolating the intermediates, have gained importance in academia and industry [1,2,3,4]. Multicomponent reactions provide numbers of valuable conceptual and synthetic advantages such as sustainability, operational simplicity, and high convergence. For these reasons, there is no doubt that MCRs are important cornerstones in the diversity-oriented synthesis and combinatorial synthesis compared with stepwise sequential approaches towards complex and important moleculars. By virtue of its inherent advantages, multicomponent reactions have been extensively applied to the total synthesis of complex moleculars and the creation of chemical libraries of drug-like compound [5,6,7]. The past decades have also witnessed a rapid development of asymmetric multicomponent reactions (AMCRs) which can serve as a versatile approach to prepare complex optically pure molecules from simple and readily available achiral substrates.
Over the past several decades, asymmetric multicomponent processes, including the powerful asymmetric A3 (aldehyde–alkyne–amine) coupling reactions, have garnered a lot of attention (Figure 1). With this strategy the optically active propargylic amines can be achieved, which are important building blocks for the synthesis of various nitrogen containing compounds, biologically active materials [8], and natural products [9]. Topics on A3-coupling have been reviewed previously but predate recent important advances [10,11,12]. Especially, a comprehensive review about asymmetric A3-coupling (AA3-coupling) has not been reported. The aim of this review is to summarize and discuss recent development in the field of AA3-coupling since the first AA3-coupling was achieved by Li in 2002 [13]. This article will be divided in two sections based on properties of amines.

2. AA3 –Coupling Derived from Primary Amine

The proposed mechanism for A3-coupling involves C-H activation by late transition metals. These metals are well known to form π-metal-complex with terminal alkynes, thereby making the alkyne proton more acidic for further abstraction. After the C-H bond is activated, the presented amines in the reaction media as the weak base could deprotonate the terminal alkynes and generate the desired organometallic alkynyl nucleophile. The imine or iminium ion reacts with the metal acetylide, resulting in the formation of the propargylamines with concomitant regeneration of the metal catalyst for another reaction cycle (Figure 2). In this process, the use of chiral ligands often produces excellent stereoselectivity.
The catalytic enantioselective synthesis of propargylamines is derived from primary amines and aldehydes commonly involved in imines as intermediates, and utilizes copper(I)/pybox ligands as the catalytic system. The first asymmetric three-component coupling of primary amines, aromatic aldehydes and aryl alkynes was described by Li in 2002 (Figure 3) [13,14]. The reactions were carried out in organic solvent as well as in aqueous media by utilizing CuOTf as the catalyst. The efficiency of several box (L1 and L2) and pybox (L3–L5) ligands was explored. Finally, the optimal reaction condition was obtained with CuOTf–L5, leading to the corresponding propargylic amines in up to 93% yields and 80–96% ee albeit in low reactivity (2–4 days, Figure 3, Equation (1)). This catalytic system could also be extended to aliphatic alkynes to afford the corresponding propargylic amines (Figure 3, Equation (2)). Unfortunately, however, the enantioselectivity of these reactions is lower, probably due to the less steric hindrance of the alkyl-substituted alkynes.
A great number of further pioneering contributions were made by the group of Singh, who improved the efficiency of these coupling reactions with a more suitable ligand [15]. They introduced a gem disubstitution at C-5 position of the oxazoline rings (Figure 4, L6 and L7). The outcome of the experiment clearly indicated that the copper(I) complex of i-Pr-pybox-diPh L7 had a drastic effect in enhancing the ee and reducing the reaction time (12–48 h). The one-pot reaction with aniline provided the corresponding product with excellent yield (98%) and enantiomeric excess (96%). The scope of the anilines was also extended to p-methoxyphenyl (PMP) amines, which could be oxidatively removed (Figure 4, Equation (2)) [16,17]. However, the three-component reaction with alkyl-substituted alkynes remains unsolved, affording propargylic amines with lower ee (84–87%) compared to aryl-substituted alkynes (Figure 4, Equation (2)).
Encouraged by these results, a variety of gem-disubstitued pybox-diPh ligands were prepared from naturally occurring α-amino acids by their earlier reported procedures [18,19,20,21]. As shown in Table 1, the substituent at C-4 chiral center of the oxazoline core had a great influence on the results [22]. Both ligands L7 and L8 were superior to all other ligands in stereocontrol. Pleasingly, the enantioselectivity was slightly increased by changing i-Pr group to s-Bu group (Table 1, entry 2 vs. 1).
With the optimal ligand L8, the enantioselectivity of the reactions with PMPNH2 and aliphatic alkynes was also improved, probably due to increased steric hindrance at β-position of the ligand (Figure 5). However, aliphatic aldehyde was not tolerated in this catalyst system.
Based on the experimental investigations, Singh and co-workers proposed a transition-state model to explain the stereochemical outcome of reaction (Figure 6). It is believed that the ‘N’ of the imine prefers to chelate with the Cu–complex in a manner where there are three stabilizing π-interactions; two C-H···π and one π···π. The aryl group on the sp2 carbon of the imine could orient itself in a manner that it is orthogonal and parallel to the phenyl rings in the oxazoline core, respectively. Thus, the transition state becomes highly organized. The steric effect also plays an important role in the reaction. As shown in Figure 6, the Re-face of the aldimine is shielded by the β-alkyl group on the chiral carbon atom of the left oxazoline ring. Therefore, the alkynylide attacks from the Si-face predominantly to afford the corresponding R-propargylamine.
In 2008, Boysen’s group developed a new pybox ligand derived from naturally occurring precursors [23,24,25]. Starting from d-glucosamine, the ligand glucopybox L14 (Figure 7) could be prepared in four steps. Then the copper(I) complex of L14 was evaluated in asymmetric A3 coupling reactions. The reaction of benzaldehyde and aniline in presence of phenylacetylene was efficiently catalyzed to afford the adduct in 69% yield and excellent 99% ee. For a broad application of the reaction, silylacetylene was used leading to the silylated propargylamines, which could be deprotected to yield terminal alkynes that are very attractive substrates to subsequence transformations. In Boysen’s work, the enantiomeric excess for the reaction with silylacetylene was improved to 90%, which was the best result compared to the previous work. Although the reactivity of the catalyst system need to be further improved, the carbohydrate-based pybox ligand showed great promise as an alternative to conventional pybox ligands due to the inexpensive raw materials.
Although the protocols reported by Li, Singh and Boysen provided direct accesses to a range of optically active propargylamines, all of them possess several substrate scope limitations and the three-component reaction with aliphatic alkynes remains unsolved. This problem was identified by Nakamura and co-workers [26,27,28,29,30,31]. In 2008, they developed a chiral Cu(II)-bis(imidazoline) complexes as highly tunable chiral catalysts [32]. In the presence of pybim L15, a wide range of alkyl-substituted alkynes was suitable substrates for the reaction, with excellent enantioselectivity observed in most cases (Figure 8). Alkyl aldehyde could also participate in the reaction to afford the secondary propargylic amine in 81% ee albeit in low reactivity (108 h, 39% yield).
In 2009, the substrate scope of the aldehydes was extended to ethyl glyoxylate by Shao and Chan [33]. Moreover, the resulted β,γ-alkynyl α-amino acid derivatives were versatile synthetic intermediates [34,35], which enabled facile transformations into a range of unnatural amino acids. The combination of Cu(I) triflate and pybox L16 was chosen to provide the desired product in good yields and 61–74% ee (Figure 9). The protocol was applicable to both aliphatic and aromatic alkynes.
The reactivity of the same reaction could be improved in the catalyst system developed by Singh [22]. The yields were improved to 79–97%, when a complex of Cu(OTf)2-L8 in toluene was used. However, the reaction could only afford the β,γ-alkynyl α-amino acid ethyl esters in poor to moderate ee (20–56%, Figure 10).
In 2017, Zhou and colleague reported a tandem AA3-coupling-carboxylative cyclization to produce chiral oxazolidinones containing an exocyclic double bond [36]. The reactions were typically performed with phenylacetylene, aromatic aldehydes and anilines employing Cu(OTf)2/L17 to provide the propargylamines (Figure 11). The sequential carboxylative cyclization was catalyzed by AgOBz with a CO2 pressure of 1.0 MPa. The one-pot reaction afforded the corresponding chiral oxazolidinones in good yields (up to 98%) and high enantioselectivities (90–96% ee).

3. AA3–Coupling Derived from Secondary Amine

When secondary rather than primary amines were employed in the AA3-coupling reactions, the nature of the reaction changed dramatically. In general, the A3-coupling with secondary amines is relatively more reactive, since the iminium ions derived from secondary amines are much more electrophilic than the (neutral) imine counterparts (Figure 12). Again, copper(I) complexes are the most extensively utilized catalysts in this area. However, the reactions with secondary amines require the use of another type of P,N-ligand.
For the synthesis of tertiary propargylic amines, the first asymmetric three-component coupling was described by Knochel in 2003. The reactions between secondary amines, aldehydes and alkynes were performed in toluene with CuBr and chiral (2-phosphino-1-naphthyl) isoquinoline (Quinap) ligand L18 (Figure 13) [37,38]. Both dibenzyl and diallylamines were successfully utilized to afford the optically active propargylamines with high yields and enantioselectivities in most cases. It was found that the employment of aliphatic aldehydes resulted in better enantioselectivities (82–96% ee) than that with aromatic aldehydes (32–78% ee). The alkyne can bear either an aryl substituent or an alkyl substituent. Pleasingly, the highest enantioselectivities were obtained with trimethylsilylacetylene (92–96% ee). According to the strong positive nonlinear effect and the crystal structure of the [CuBr{(R)-quinap}]2 complex [39,40], it is believed that a dimeric Cu-Quinap complex is the catalytically active species. On the basis of these investigations, a plausible mechanism was suggested by the authors (Figure 13).
To evaluate the synthetic potential of this catalyst system, Knochel’s group performed a more profound investigation of their asymmetric A3-coupling procedure with trimethylsilylacetylene. The trimethylsilyl group was easily removed by treatment of the silylated propargylamines with Bu4NF in THF, leading to the corresponding terminal propargylic amines without a loss of enantiopurity (Figure 14) [41,42].
Further transformations of the terminal alkynes to various functionalized derivatives were also examined (Figure 15) [41]. First, the alkynyllithium reagents, derived from n-butyllithium and the terminal propargylic amines 1, could react with a series of electrophilic reagents (Figure 15). For example, the reaction of the alkynyllithium with ethyl chloroformate provided the chiral alkynyl ester 2 in 95% yield and 88% ee. The deuteration of the alkynyllithium with D2O provided the monodeuterated alkyne 3 in 98% yield and >95% deuterium incorporation. Similarly, the alkylation and allylation of the alkynyllithium with pentyl iodide and allyl iodide furnished the corresponding chiral propargylamines 4 and 5 in 95% and 94% yield, respectively. The Sonogashira cross-coupling of the terminal propargylic amines with ethyl 4-iodobenzoate afforded the corresponding phenylacetylene derivative 6 in 87% yield and 90% ee.
Since the catalyst is not soluble in pentane, the Cu(I)-Quinap complex could be recovered by simple filtration and used in up to three times [41]. The results showed that the coupling reaction could be performed with the same catalyst without significant loss in enantioselectivity and with only a slight drop in yield (Table 2).
Manipulations of the product also offer opportunities to generate other heterocycles [43,44]. For instance, the terminal alkynes could be efficiently converted, through click reaction [45,46], into useful chiral α-aminoalkyl-1,2,3-triazoles of type 7 in the presence of copper powder (Figure 16a). On the other hand, the terminal alkynes could be acylated resulting in the formation of alkynones 8 in excellent yield [47,48]. Then, treatment of 8 with amidine in refluxing acetonitrile afforded the chiral aminopyrimidines of type 9 without a loss of enantiopurity (Figure 16b) [49,50,51]. Knochel et al. also demonstrated a short enantioselective synthesis of (S)-(+)-coniine 12 (Figure 16c), which is a highly toxic alkaloid inducing curare type paralysis [52,53,54]. Alkylation and protection of the terminal alkyne 10 with ethylene oxide and TIPSCl gave the propargylamines 11 in 70% yield. The deprotection of the tertiary amine and reduction of the triple bond were readily achieved by hydrogenation in methanol. Subsequent desilylation and intramolecular Mitsunobu reaction provided an enantioselective access to (S)-(+)-coniine 12.
In the course of their previous research, it was observed that the use of dibenzylamine is essential to ensure high enantioselectivities. Considering deprotection of the propargylamines would extend their utility, it is highly desirable to deprotect the adduct under mild conditions and yield the corresponding primary propargylamine selectively. However, removal of the benzyl group via hydrogenolysis was accompanied by reduction of the triple-bond. Later, bis(phenallyl)amine was successfully employed as the amine component to furnish bis(phenallyl)-protected propargylamines (up to 96% ee) [55]. Then the allyl group was selectively removed through Pd(0)-catalyzed allylic substitution with 1,3-dimethylbarbituric acid (DMBA), delivering the primary propargylamines in good to high yields (Figure 17).
As the enantioselectivity of the A3-coulping reactions was found to be highly dependent on the amine component, the influence of further substituents in dibenzylamine was investigated by Knochel and co-workers [56]. The utilization of bulkier secondary amine, (mesitylmethyl)benzylamine 13, led to the formation of propargylamines 14 in excellent enantioselectivities (91–99% ee). Furthermore, selective mono-deprotection of the propargylamines was achieved by hydrogenation affording the secondary amine 15 in high yield (Figure 18).
A drawback of Knochel’s protocol is the use of Quinap, which is rather expensive and difficult to prepare. In 2004, Carreira and co-workers creatively designed a new class of P,N-ligands L20 and L21 (Pinap) [57]. They were conveniently resolved and prepared in four steps. Both diastereomeric Pinap ligands could be obtained after separation by crystallization or silica gel chromatography. Then the Pinap ligands were tested in Cu-catalyzed AA3-coupling reactions. As shown in Table 3, the new ligand showed parallel reactivity to Quinap. Moreover, Carreira et al. observed that the Cu(I) complexes of L20 and L21 catalyzed the formation of the propargylic amines in 90–99% ee, which is superior to Quinap when alkyl aldehydes are used.
Following the success of this protocol, Carreira and co-workers exhibited the AA3 coupling reactions with 4-piperidone as the amine component (Figure 19) [58]. Again, (R,R)-Pinap L21 was chosen as the optimal ligand. It is worth pointing out that the reaction rate was increased (up to 5-fold) when dichloromethane was used instead of toluene, since it was observed that the complex formed between CuBr and (R,R)-Pinap L21 could completely soluble in dichloromethane. Carrying out these reactions with silyl-substituted alkynes resulted in higher enantioselectivity (85–96% ee) compared to aryl-substituted alkynes (83–85% ee) and aliphatic alkynes (70% ee). With respect to practically, the tertiary amine adducts could be selectively removed in the presence of a solid-supported amine scavenger.
On the basis of the previous work, Ma’s group reported a CuBr/Pinap-catalyzed AA3-coupling reaction utilizing pyrrolidine or 1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline as the secondary amine (Figure 20) [59]. In the presence of 2-methylbut-3-yn-2-ol 16, the corresponding chiral propargylamines were obtained in high yields (79–95%) and excellent ee (91–>99%). According to the control experiments, the dimethylcarbinol unit in the alkyne component played an important role in ensuring high enantioselectivity. It was believed that the possible coordination of the hydroxyl oxygen to copper(I) was responsible for the excellent stereoselectivity. Furthermore, the 2-hydroxy-2-propyl group could be easily removed to afford the terminal propargylic amines 17 [60]. The generated terminal alkynes could further be functionalized via Sonogashira cross-coupling and furnished the phenylacetylene derivative 18 in 70% yield [61,62]. Treatment of 17 with n-BuLi could generate the alkynyllithium intermediate. The following alkylation with paraformaldehyde or methyl chloroformate provided the corresponding alcohol 19 or alkynoate 20 [63], respectively. It is important to stress that both aliphatic and aromatic aldehydes were tolerated in this protocol.
Next the amine component was expanded to pyrroline. In this reaction, instead of the normal propargylic amines, optically active N-allyl pyrrole 21 was unexpectedly obtained in 97% ee with a complete E-stereoselectivity (Figure 21) [64]. Based on the results of deuterium-labeling experiments, a possible mechanism of the coupling-semireduction reaction was proposed in Figure 21. It suggested that the alkyne 16 was coordinated with the copper(I) complex through the hydroxyl oxygen. Then the copper alkynylide specie 22 reacted with the iminium ion, yielding the corresponding propargylic amine-CuBr complex 23. This compound would afford the iminium intermediate 24 via an anti-1,5-hydride transfer, in which the unsaturated cyclic dialkylamine acted as a hydrogen donor. Finally, the protodemetalation of 24 resulted in the N-allyl pyrrole 21 and regenerated the catalyst.
In 2013, an atropisomeric P,N-ligand L22, which they named StackPhos, was designed and synthesized by Aponick and co-workers. Instead of the fused 6-membered aromatics, an imidazole ring was incorporated into the biaryl system (Figure 22) [65]. The N-containing heterocycle not only contains a coordinating atom, but also provides the possibility to stabilize the chiral conformation through π-stacking. Then the performance of L22 was tested in the AA3-coupling reaction of silylacetylene. Delightfully, the reactivity was enhanced compared to Quinap. The corresponding chiral propargylamines were isolated in high yields (60–95%), the reaction time was drastically reduced from 4 days to 24 h with the StackPhos ligand compared with other axially chiral ligands such as Quinap and Pinap. It is noteworthy that the catalyst system enabled the use of both aliphatic and aromatic aldehydes with excellent enantioselectivity (89–97% ee).
Following the same strategy, new P,N-ligands L23 and L24 (StackPhim) were prepared by the same group in 2017 [66]. The two diastereomeric phosphines could be readily separated by simple column chromatography without a resolution process. Then the ligands were evaluated in CuBr-catalyzed AA3-coupling with butynyl diol rac-25. As shown in Table 4, the desired propargyl amine 26 was obtained in high yields after 4 h. Moreover, the subsequent Au-catalyzed cyclization of the alkyne provide an efficient access to chiral 2-aminoalkyl furan 27 [67]. The (S,R,R)-StackPhim L23 exhibited superiority in stereocontrol toward this reaction compared with the previous reported (S)-StackPhos L22 (Table 4, entry 2 vs. 1). Notably, the stereoselectivity was further improved to 94% ee with the diastereomeric ligand L24 (Table 4, entry 3). Once again, the substrate scope of the aldehyde had little influence on both the yields and the stereoselectivities.
In 2014, Naeimi et al. reported the use of Schiff base as a chiral tetradentate ligand in the AA3-coupling reaction of morpholine [68]. The preparation of the catalyst was very simple using readily available chemicals. Nevertheless, it is regrettable that the Cu(I) complex of thiosalen could only deliver the corresponding propargylamines in moderate to good enantiomeric excesses (43–69% ee) (Figure 23).
In addition to the use of phosphine-based ligands, Seidel reported the application of carboxylic acid-thiourea as a cocatalyst in Cu(I)-catalyzed asymmetric A3 reactions with pyrrolidine [69]. A series of urea catalysts were prepared and tested. The authors found that the combination of cocatalyst L25 and CuI exhibited the best efficiency (Figure 24, Equation (1)). They also attempted to rationalize the roles of the cocatalyst. The data suggested that L25 acted as a ligand for copper(I), forming a highly reactive copper acetylide complex. However, the role of the carboxylate moiety in the enantiodetermining step remained unclear. In addition, this method was successfully transferred to the synthesis of chiral allenes in the presence of AgNO3 (Figure 24, Equation (2)) [70].

4. Conclusions

In summary, this review has demonstrated the recent advances in asymmetric A3-coupling reactions. From the perspective of atom and step economy, the multicomponent character of this process provides a great convenience for the enantioselevtive synthesis of propargylic amines. Although great progress has been made, there are still substantial hurdles to be overcome. For example, the catalytic efficiency needs to be further improved, the substrate scope needs to be expanded, and mechanisms need to be investigated in greater detail. Tandem processes that combine different types of reactions in a single operation are also appealing. It is reasonable to believe that the discovery and development of new chiral ligands will continue to flourish and result in more developments in the years to come.

Author Contributions

J.-N.M. and J.S. collected the literature references. J.-N.M. and J.Z. contributed to the manuscript writing.

Funding

Financial support was received from Dalian University of Technology (2018-93).

Acknowledgments

We thank a start-up grant from Dalian University of Technology (2018-93) for financial support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ugi, I.; Dömling, A.; Hörl, W. Multicomponent Reactions in Organic Chemistry. Endeavour 1994, 18, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yu, J.; Shi, F.; Gong, L.-Z. Brønsted-Acid-Catalyzed Asymmetric Multicomponent Reactions for the Facile Synthesis of Highly Enantioenriched Structurally Diverse Nitrogenous Heterocycles. Acc. Chem. Res. 2011, 44, 1156–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. De Graaff, C.; Ruijter, E.; Orru, R.V.A. Recent Developments in Asymmetric Multicomponent Reactions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 3969–4009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Visbal, R.; Grau, S.; Herrera, R.P.; Gimeno, M.C. Gold Catalyzed Multicomponent Reactions beyond A3 Coupling. Molecules 2018, 23, 2255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Touré, B.B.; Hall, D.G. Natural Product Synthesis Using Multicomponent Reaction Strategies. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 4439–4486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dömling, A.; Wang, W.; Wang, K. Chemistry and Biology of Multicomponent Reactions. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 3083–3135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Eckert, H. Diversity Oriented Syntheses of Conventional Heterocycles by Smart Multi Component Reactions (MCRs) of the Last Decade. Molecules 2012, 17, 1074–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Trost, B.M.; Chung, C.K.; Pinkerton, A.B. Stereocontrolled Total Synthesis of (+)-Streptazolin by a Palladium-Catalyzed Reductive Diyne Cyclization. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 4327–4329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fleming, J.J.; Bois, J.D. A Synthesis of (+)-Saxitoxin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 3926–3927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Peshkov, V.A.; Pereshivko, O.P.; Van der Eycken, E.V. A Walk around the A3-Coupling. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 3790–3807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yoo, W.-J.; Zhao, L.; Li, C.-J. The A3-Coupling (Aldehyde–Alkyne–Amine) Reaction: A Versatile Method for the Preparation of Propargylamines. Aldrichimica Acta 2011, 44, 43–51. [Google Scholar]
  12. Gommermann, N.; Knochel, P. Practical Highly Enantioselective Synthesis of Propargylamines through a Copper-Catalyzed One-Pot Three-Component Condensation Reaction. Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12, 4380–4392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wei, C.; Li, C.-J. Enantioselective Direct-Addition of Terminal Alkynes to Imines Catalyzed by Copper(I)pybox Complex in Water and in Toluene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 5638–5639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wei, C.; Mague, J.T.; Li, C.-J. Cu(I)-Catalyzed Direct Addition and Asymmetric Addition of Terminal Alkynes to Imines. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 5749–5754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Bisai, A.; Singh, V.K. Enantioselective One-Pot Three-Component Synthesis of Propargylamines. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 2405–2408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Córdova, A.; Notz, W.; Zhong, G.; Betancort, J.M.; Barbas, C.F. A Highly Enantioselective Amino Acid-Catalyzed Route to Functionalized α-Amino Acids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 1842–1843. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. Enders, D.; Grondal, C.; Vrettou, M.; Raabe, G. Asymmetric Synthesis of Selectively Protected Amino Sugars and Derivatives by a Direct Organocatalytic Mannich Reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 4079–4083. [Google Scholar]
  18. Ginotra, S.K.; Singh, V.K. Studies on Enantioselective Allylic Oxidation of Olefins Using Peresters Catalyzed by Cu(I)-Complexes of Chiral Pybox Ligands. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2006, 4, 4370–4374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ginotra, S.K.; Singh, V.K. Enantioselective Oxidation of Olefins Catalyzed by Chiral Copper Bis(oxazolinyl)pyridine Complexes: A Reassessment. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 3573–3581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sekar, G.; DattaGupta, A.; Singh, V.K. Asymmetric Kharasch Reaction:  Catalytic Enantioselective Allylic Oxidation of Olefins Using Chiral Pyridine Bis(diphenyloxazoline)−Copper Complexes and tert-Butyl Perbenzoate. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 2961–2967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. DattaGupta, A.; Singh, V.K. Catalytic Enantioselective Allylic Oxidation of Olefins with Copper Complexes of Chiral Nonracemic Bis(oxazolinyl)pyridine Type Ligands. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 2633–2636. [Google Scholar]
  22. Bisai, A.; Singh, V.K. Enantioselective One-Pot Three-Component Synthesis of Propargylamines Catalyzed by Copper(I)-Pyridine Bis-(oxazoline) Complexes. Tetrahedron. 2012, 68, 3480–3486. [Google Scholar]
  23. Irmak, M.; Groschner, A.; Boysen, M.M.K. glucoBox Ligand—A New Carbohydrate-Based Bis(oxazoline) Ligand.Synthesis and First Application. Chem. Commun. 2007, 2, 177–179. [Google Scholar]
  24. Irmak, M.; Lehnert, T.; Boysen, M.M.K. First Synthesis of a Carbohydrate-Derived Pyridyl Bis(thiazoline) Ligand. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 7890–7893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Irmak, M.; Boysen, M.M.K. A New Pyridyl Bis(oxazoline)Ligand Prepared from D-Glucosamine for Asymmetric Alkynylation of Imines. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2008, 350, 403–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nakamura, S.; Hyodo, K.; Nakamura, Y.; Shibata, N.; Toru, T. Novel Enantiocomplementary C2-Symmetric Chiral Bis(imidazoline) Ligands: Highly Enantioselective Friedel–Crafts Alkylation of Indoles with Ethyl 3,3,3-Trifluoropyruvate. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2008, 350, 1443–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hara, N.; Nakamura, S.; Shibata, N.; Toru, T. First Enantioselective Synthesis of (R)-Convolutamydine B and E with N-(Heteroarenesulfonyl)prolinamides. Chem. Eur. J. 2009, 15, 6790–6793. [Google Scholar]
  28. Nakamura, S.; Hara, N.; Nakashima, H.; Kubo, K.; Shibata, N.; Toru, T. Enantioselective Synthesis of (R)-Convolutamydine A with New N-Heteroarylsulfonylprolinamides. Chem. Eur. J. 2008, 14, 8079–8081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nakamura, S.; Nakashima, H.; Sugimoto, H.; Sano, H.; Hattori, M.; Shibata, N.; Toru, T. Enantioselective C–C Bond Formation to Sulfonylimines through Use of the 2-Pyridinesulfonyl Group as a Novel Stereocontroller. Chem. Eur. J. 2008, 14, 2145–2152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nakamura, S.; Nakashima, H.; Yamamura, A.; Shibata, N.; Toru, T. Organocatalytic Enantioselective Hydrophosphonylation of Sulfonylimines having a Heteroarenesulfonyl Group as a Novel Stereocontroller. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2008, 350, 1209–1212. [Google Scholar]
  31. Nakamura, S.; Sakurai, Y.; Nakashima, H.; Shibata, N.; Toru, T. Organocatalytic Enantioselective Aza-Friedel-Crafts Alkylation of Pyrroles with N-(Heteroarenesulfonyl)imines. Synlett 2009, 10, 1639–1642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nakamura, S.; Ohara, M.; Nakamura, Y.; Shibata, N.; Toru, T. Copper-Catalyzed Enantioselective Three-Component Synthesis of Optically Active Propargylamines from Aldehydes, Amines, and Aliphatic Alkynes. Chem. Eur. J. 2010, 16, 2360–2362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Shao, Z.; Pu, X.; Li, X.; Fan, B.; Chan, A.S.C. Enantioselective, Copper(I)-Catalyzed Three-Component Reaction for the Synthesis of β, γ-Alkynyl α-Amino Acid Derivatives. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2009, 20, 225–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Abdulganeeva, S.A.; Erzhanov, K.B. Acetylenic Amino Acids. Russ. Chem. Rev. 1991, 60, 676–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Angst, C. Stereoselective Synthesis of β, γ-Unsaturated Amino Acids. Pure Appl. Chem. 1987, 59, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gao, X.-T.; Gan, C.-C.; Liu, S.-Y.; Zhou, F.; Wu, H.-H.; Zhou, J. Utilization of CO2 as a C1 Building Block in a Tandem Asymmetric A3 Coupling-Carboxylative Cyclization Sequence to 2-Oxazolidinones. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 8588–8593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Alcock, N.W.; Brown, J.M.; Hulmes, D.I. Synthesis and Resolution of 1-(2-Diphenylphosphino-1-naphthyl)isoquinoline; a P–N Chelating Ligand for Asymmetric Catalysis. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1993, 4, 743–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gommermann, N.; Koradin, C.; Polborn, K.; Knochel, P. Enantioselective, Copper(I)-Catalyzed Three-Component Reaction for the Preparation of Propargylamines. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 5763–5766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Koradin, C.; Polborn, K.; Knochel, P. Enantioselective Synthesis of Propargylamines by Copper-Catalyzed Addition of Alkynes to Enamines. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2535–2538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Koradin, C.; Gommermann, N.; Polborn, K.; Knochel, P. Synthesis of Enantiomerically Enriched Propargylamines by Copper-Catalyzed Addition of Alkynes to Enamines. Chem. Eur. J. 2003, 9, 2797–2811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gommermann, N.; Knochel, P. Practical Highly Enantioselective Synthesis of Terminal Propargylamines. An Expeditious Synthesis of (S)-(+)-Coniine. Chem. Commun. 2004, 2324–2325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Gommermann, N.; Knochel, P. Preparation of Functionalized Primary Chiral Amines and Amides via an Enantioselective Three-Component Synthesis of Propargylamines. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 11418–11426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Dube, H.; Gommermann, N.; Knochel, P. Synthesis of Chiral α-Aminoalkylpyrimidines Using an Enantioselective Three-Component Reaction. Synthesis 2004, 12, 2015–2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Gommermann, N.; Gehrig, A.; Knochel, P. Enantioselective Synthesis of Chiral a-Aminoalkyl-1,2,3-triazoles Using α-Three-Component Reaction. Synlett 2005, 18, 2796–2798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kolb, H.C.; Finn, M.G.; Sharpless, K.B. Click Chemistry: Diverse Chemical Function from a Few Good Reactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2004–2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kolb, H.C.; Sharpless, K.B. The Growing Impact of Click Chemistry on Drug Discovery. Drug. Discov. Today 2003, 8, 1128–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Fürstner, A.; Szillat, H.; Gabor, B.; Mynott, R. Platinum- and Acid-Catalyzed Enyne Metathesis Reactions:  Mechanistic Studies and Applications to the Syntheses of Streptorubin B and Metacycloprodigiosin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 8305–8314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Karpov, A.S.; Müller, T.J.J. New Entry to a Three-Component Pyrimidine Synthesis by TMS−Ynones via Sonogashira Coupling. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 3451–3454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Adlington, R.M.; Baldwin, J.E.; Catterick, D.; Pritchard, G.J. A Versatile Approach to Pyrimidin-4-yl Substituted α-Aminoacids from Alkynyl Ketones; the Total Synthesis of L-Lathyrine. Chem. Commun. 1997, 1757–1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Adlington, R.M.; Baldwin, J.E.; Catterick, D.; Pritchard, G.J. The Synthesis of Pyrimidin-4-yl Pubstituted α-Amino Acids. Aversatile Approach from Alkynyl Ketones. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1999, 855–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Adlington, R.M.; Baldwin, J.E.; Pritchard, G.J.; Spencer, K.C. Synthesis of Novel C-Nucleosides with Potential Applications in Combinatorial and Parallel Synthesis. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 575–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Bois, F.; Gardette, D.; Gramain, J.-C. A New Asymmetric Synthesis of (S)-(+)-Pipecoline and (S)-(+)- and (R)-(−)-Coniine by Reductive Photocyclization of Dienamides. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 8769–8772. [Google Scholar]
  53. Chippindale, A.M.; Davies, S.G.; Iwamoto, K.; Parkin, R.M.; Smethurst, C.A.P.; Smith, A.D.; Rodriguez-Solla, H. Asymmetric Synthesis of Cyclic β-Amino Acids and Cyclic Amines via Sequential Diastereoselective Conjugate Addition and Ring Closing Metathesis. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 3253–3265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hayes, J.F.; Shipman, M.; Twin, H. Asymmetric Synthesis of 2-Substituted Piperidines Using a Multi-Component Coupling Reaction: Rapid Assembly of (S)-Coniine from (S)-1-(1-phenylethyl)-2-Methyleneaziridine. Chem. Commun. 2001, 1784–1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Gommermann, N.; Knochel, P. 2-Phenallyl as a Versatile Protecting Group for the Asymmetric One-Pot Three-Component Synthesis of Propargylamines. Chem. Commun. 2005, 4175–4177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Gommermann, N.; Knochel, P. Highly Enantioselective Synthesis of Propargylamines Using (Mesitylmethyl)benzylamine. Synlett 2005, 18, 2799–2801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Knöpfel, T.F.; Aschwanden, P.; Ichikawa, T.; Watanabe, T.; Carreira, E.M. Readily Available Biaryl P,N Ligands for Asymmetric Catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 5971–5973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Aschwanden, P.; Stephenson, C.R.J.; Carreira, E.M. Highly Enantioselective Access to Primary Propargylamines: 4-Piperidinone as a Convenient Protecting Group. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 2437–2440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Fan, W.; Ma, S. An Easily Removable Stereo-dictating Group for Enantioselective Synthesis of Propargylic Amines. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 10175–10177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Neenan, T.X.; Whitesides, G.M. Synthesis of High Carbon Materials from Acetylenic Precursors. Preparation of Aromatic Monomers Bearing Multiple Ethynyl Groups. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 2489–2496. [Google Scholar]
  61. Schmittel, M.; Ammon, H. Preparation of a Rigid Macrocycle with Two Exotopic Phenanthroline Binding Sites. Synlett 1999, 6, 750–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Tykwinski, R.R. Evolution in the Palladium-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling of sp- and sp2-Hybridized Carbon Atoms. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 42, 1566–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Heuft, M.A.; Collins, S.K.; Yep, G.P.A.; Fallis, A.G. Synthesis of Diynes and Tetraynes from in Situ Desilylation/Dimerization of Acetylenes. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2883–2886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Fan, W.; Yuan, W.; Ma, S. Unexpected E-stereoselective Reductive A3-Coupling Reaction of Terminal Alkynes with Aldehydes and Amines. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3884–3892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Cardoso, F.S.P.; Abboud, K.A.; Aponick, A. Design, Preparation, and Implementation of an Imidazole-Based Chiral Biaryl P,N-Ligand for Asymmetric Catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 14548–14551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Paioti, P.H.S.; Abboud, K.A.; Aponick, A. Incorporation of Axial Chirality into Phosphino-Imidazoline Ligands for Enantioselective Catalysis. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 2133–2138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Aponick, A.; Li, C.-Y.; Malinge, J.; Marques, E.F. An Extremely Facile Synthesis of Furans, Pyrroles, and Thiophenes by the Dehydrative Cyclization of Propargyl Alcohols. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 4624–4627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Naeimi, H.; Moradian, M. Thioether-based Copper(I) Schiff Base Complex as a Catalyst for a Direct and Asymmetric A3-coupling Reaction. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2014, 25, 429–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zhao, C.; Seidel, D. Enantioselective A3 Reactions of Secondary Amines with a Cu(I)/Acid−Thiourea Catalyst Combination. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 4650–4653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Periasamy, M.; Sanjeevakumar, N.; Dalai, M.; Gurubrahamam, R.; Reddy, P.O. Highly Enantioselective Synthesis of Chiral Allenes by Sequential Creation of Stereogenic Center and Chirality Transfer in a Single Pot Operation. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 2932–2935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 24 01216 g001
Figure 1. Asymmetric A3-coupling reaction.
Figure 1. Asymmetric A3-coupling reaction.
Molecules 24 01216 g001
Molecules 24 01216 g002
Figure 2. Generalized mechanism of A3-coupling with primary amines.
Figure 2. Generalized mechanism of A3-coupling with primary amines.
Molecules 24 01216 g002
Molecules 24 01216 g003
Figure 3. Enantioselective three-component reaction with box and pybox ligands.
Figure 3. Enantioselective three-component reaction with box and pybox ligands.
Molecules 24 01216 g003
Molecules 24 01216 g004
Figure 4. Cu(I)/i-Pr-pybox-diPh-catalyzed AA3-couplings.
Figure 4. Cu(I)/i-Pr-pybox-diPh-catalyzed AA3-couplings.
Molecules 24 01216 g004
Molecules 24 01216 g005
Figure 5. Cu(I)/s-Bu-pybox-diPh-catalyzed AA3-couplings.
Figure 5. Cu(I)/s-Bu-pybox-diPh-catalyzed AA3-couplings.
Molecules 24 01216 g005
Molecules 24 01216 g006
Figure 6. Proposed favored transition state.
Figure 6. Proposed favored transition state.
Molecules 24 01216 g006
Molecules 24 01216 g007
Figure 7. Cu(I)/glucoPybox-catalyzed AA3-couplings.
Figure 7. Cu(I)/glucoPybox-catalyzed AA3-couplings.
Molecules 24 01216 g007
Molecules 24 01216 g008
Figure 8. Cu(II)/pybim-catalyzed AA3-couplings.
Figure 8. Cu(II)/pybim-catalyzed AA3-couplings.
Molecules 24 01216 g008
Molecules 24 01216 g009
Figure 9. Asymmetric three-component reactions of ethyl glyoxylate.
Figure 9. Asymmetric three-component reactions of ethyl glyoxylate.
Molecules 24 01216 g009
Molecules 24 01216 g010
Figure 10. Cu(II)/s-Bu-pybox-diPh-catalyzed AA3-couplings.
Figure 10. Cu(II)/s-Bu-pybox-diPh-catalyzed AA3-couplings.
Molecules 24 01216 g010
Molecules 24 01216 g011
Figure 11. Tandem AA3-coupling-carboxylative cyclization.
Figure 11. Tandem AA3-coupling-carboxylative cyclization.
Molecules 24 01216 g011
Molecules 24 01216 g012
Figure 12. Asymmetric A3-couplings with secondary amines.
Figure 12. Asymmetric A3-couplings with secondary amines.
Molecules 24 01216 g012
Molecules 24 01216 g013
Figure 13. CuBr-Quinap-catalyzed AA3-couplings.
Figure 13. CuBr-Quinap-catalyzed AA3-couplings.
Molecules 24 01216 g013
Molecules 24 01216 g014
Figure 14. Asymmetric A3-couplings and desilylation to terminal alkynes.
Figure 14. Asymmetric A3-couplings and desilylation to terminal alkynes.
Molecules 24 01216 g014
Molecules 24 01216 g015
Figure 15. Functionalization of the terminal alkynes.
Figure 15. Functionalization of the terminal alkynes.
Molecules 24 01216 g015
Molecules 24 01216 g016
Figure 16. Transformations of the terminal alkynes to heterocycles.
Figure 16. Transformations of the terminal alkynes to heterocycles.
Molecules 24 01216 g016
Molecules 24 01216 g017
Figure 17. Asymmetric A3-couplings and deprotection to primary amines.
Figure 17. Asymmetric A3-couplings and deprotection to primary amines.
Molecules 24 01216 g017
Molecules 24 01216 g018
Figure 18. Asymmetric A3-couplings of bulky secondary amine.
Figure 18. Asymmetric A3-couplings of bulky secondary amine.
Molecules 24 01216 g018
Molecules 24 01216 g019
Figure 19. AA3-couplings of 4-piperidone·HCl.
Figure 19. AA3-couplings of 4-piperidone·HCl.
Molecules 24 01216 g019
Molecules 24 01216 g020
Figure 20. AA3-couplings utilizing pyrrolidine as the secondary amine.
Figure 20. AA3-couplings utilizing pyrrolidine as the secondary amine.
Molecules 24 01216 g020
Molecules 24 01216 g021
Figure 21. The synthesis of N-allyl amines via A3-couplings.
Figure 21. The synthesis of N-allyl amines via A3-couplings.
Molecules 24 01216 g021
Molecules 24 01216 g022
Figure 22. Enantioselective A3-coupling employing L22.
Figure 22. Enantioselective A3-coupling employing L22.
Molecules 24 01216 g022
Molecules 24 01216 g023
Figure 23. AA3-coupling reactions based on Cu(I)/Schiff base complex.
Figure 23. AA3-coupling reactions based on Cu(I)/Schiff base complex.
Molecules 24 01216 g023
Molecules 24 01216 g024
Figure 24. Enantioselective three-component reactions with thiourea and CuI.
Figure 24. Enantioselective three-component reactions with thiourea and CuI.
Molecules 24 01216 g024
Table 1. Scope of different pybox on AA3-coupling.
Table 1. Scope of different pybox on AA3-coupling.
Molecules 24 01216 i001
EntryPyboxTimeYield a (%)ee (%)
1i-Pr-pybox-diPh (L7)16 h9890
2s-Bu-pybox-diPh (L8)18 h9793
3i-Bu-pybox-diPh (L9)4 days5663
4t-Bu-pybox-diPh (L10)22 h9068
5Bn-pybox-diPh (L11)5 days4564
6Me-pybox-diPh (L12)4 days5153
7Ph-pybox-diPh (L13)28 h9675(S) b
a All the reactions were performed under an argon atmosphere and yields were reported as isolated yield. b (R,R)–Ligand was used.
Table 2. Catalyst recycling on the AA3-coupling.
Table 2. Catalyst recycling on the AA3-coupling.
Molecules 24 01216 i002
RunYield (%) aee (%) b
19998
28797
38998
a Isolated yield. b Enantiomeric excess determined by HPLC using Chiracel OD-H column (n-heptane: i-PrOH).
Table 3. CuBr/Pinap-catalyzed AA3-coupling.
Table 3. CuBr/Pinap-catalyzed AA3-coupling.
Molecules 24 01216 i003
R1R2LigandYield [%]Ee [%]Quinap [% ee]
i-PrMe3SiL208498 (R)92
L218299 (S)
i-PrPhL208890 (R)84
L218295 (S)
i-Bui-BuL207491 (R)82
L217294 (S)
Table 4. The evaluation of StackPhim.
Table 4. The evaluation of StackPhim.
Molecules 24 01216 i004
EntryLigandProductYield 26/26′Yield 27/ent-27 ee
1L22Molecules 24 01216 i00586%80%66%
2L2364%75%82%
3L24Molecules 24 01216 i00674%81%−94%

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mo, J.-N.; Su, J.; Zhao, J. The Asymmetric A3(Aldehyde–Alkyne–Amine) Coupling: Highly Enantioselective Access to Propargylamines. Molecules 2019, 24, 1216. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24071216

AMA Style

Mo J-N, Su J, Zhao J. The Asymmetric A3(Aldehyde–Alkyne–Amine) Coupling: Highly Enantioselective Access to Propargylamines. Molecules. 2019; 24(7):1216. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24071216

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mo, Jia-Nan, Junqi Su, and Jiannan Zhao. 2019. "The Asymmetric A3(Aldehyde–Alkyne–Amine) Coupling: Highly Enantioselective Access to Propargylamines" Molecules 24, no. 7: 1216. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24071216

APA Style

Mo, J.-N., Su, J., & Zhao, J. (2019). The Asymmetric A3(Aldehyde–Alkyne–Amine) Coupling: Highly Enantioselective Access to Propargylamines. Molecules, 24(7), 1216. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24071216

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop