The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Research and Communication in the Social Sciences and Humanities

Topic Information

Dear Colleagues,

The undeniable and inevitable rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in various fields of human activity presents both remarkable opportunities and potential risks for scientific research. While AI promises significant advances, its integration into research practices raises uncertainties and ethical considerations. These concerns extend beyond the design and conduct of research to the products of scientific inquiry, their dissemination through various communication channels, peer review processes, and engagement with both specialized and broader audiences. As a result, the landscape of scientific activity is undergoing a fundamental transformation, driven by AI-based technologies. This evolving context poses profound challenges to science itself and to researchers. These challenges involve complex and often controversial issues across technical and ethical domains. Key questions include the extent to which AI tools can actively participate in research activities, from analysis and co-authorship to dissemination. In addition, the role of human researchers in knowledge creation and dissemination is under scrutiny. This call highlights the need for proactivity within the Social Sciences and the Humanities regarding the specificities of AI use and its broader implications. This topic aims to foster a deeper understanding of these critical issues and to promote informed practices for the development of rigorous knowledge.

We welcome submissions that address this topic from a variety of theoretical and methodological perspectives and a range of manuscript types, including research articles, reviews, commentaries, and others. We are particularly interested in manuscripts that bridge the gap between technical advances in AI and the specific needs and considerations of research in Social Sciences and the Humanities.

Dr. Sandro Serpa
Dr. Maria José Sá
Topic Editors

Keywords

Participating Journals

Journal Name	Impact Factor	CiteScore	Launched Year	First Decision (median)	APC
Societies societies	1.7	3.1	2011	32.1 Days	CHF 1400	Submit
AI ai	3.1	7.2	2020	18.9 Days	CHF 1600	Submit
Social Sciences socsci	1.7	2.6	2012	34.2 Days	CHF 1800	Submit

Preprints.org is a multidisciplinary platform offering a preprint service designed to facilitate the early sharing of your research. It supports and empowers your research journey from the very beginning.

MDPI Topics is collaborating with Preprints.org and has established a direct connection between MDPI journals and the platform. Authors are encouraged to take advantage of this opportunity by posting their preprints at Preprints.org prior to publication:

1. Share your research immediately: disseminate your ideas prior to publication and establish priority for your work.
2. Safeguard your intellectual contribution: Protect your ideas with a time-stamped preprint that serves as proof of your research timeline.
3. Boost visibility and impact: Increase the reach and influence of your research by making it accessible to a global audience.
4. Gain early feedback: Receive valuable input and insights from peers before submitting to a journal.
5. Ensure broad indexing: Web of Science (Preprint Citation Index), Google Scholar, Crossref, SHARE, PrePubMed, Scilit and Europe PMC.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results

Content type Publication Date

Result details

Normal Extended Compact

Journals

All Societies AI Social Sciences

Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less

Select all

Export citation of selected articles as:

Plain Text BibTeX BibTeX (without abstracts) Endnote Endnote (without abstracts) Tab-delimited RIS

Error

Oops... you haven't selected anything for export.

Ok

clear

12 pages, 1289 KiB  

Open AccessArticle

Social Biases in AI-Generated Creative Texts: A Mixed-Methods Approach in the Spanish Context

by María Gabino-Campos, José I. Baile and Aura Padilla-Martínez

Soc. Sci. 2025, 14(3), 170; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14030170 - 11 Mar 2025

Viewed by 981

Abstract

This study addresses the biases in artificial intelligence (AI) when generating creative content, a growing challenge due to the widespread adoption of these technologies in creating automated narratives. Biases in AI reflect and amplify social inequalities. They perpetuate stereotypes and limit diverse representation [...] Read more.

This study addresses the biases in artificial intelligence (AI) when generating creative content, a growing challenge due to the widespread adoption of these technologies in creating automated narratives. Biases in AI reflect and amplify social inequalities. They perpetuate stereotypes and limit diverse representation in the generated outputs. Through an experimental approach with ChatGPT-4, biases related to age, gender, sexual orientation, ethnicity, religion, physical appearance, and socio-economic status, are analyzed in AI-generated stories about successful individuals in the context of Spain. The results reveal an overrepresentation of young, heterosexual, and Hispanic characters, alongside a marked underrepresentation of diverse groups such as older individuals, ethnic minorities, and characters with varied socio-economic backgrounds. These findings validate the hypothesis that AI systems replicate and amplify the biases present in their training data. This process reinforces social inequalities. To mitigate these effects, the study suggests solutions such as diversifying training datasets and conducting regular ethical audits, with the aim of fostering more inclusive AI systems. These measures seek to ensure that AI technologies fairly represent human diversity and contribute to a more equitable society. Full article

(This article belongs to the Topic The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Research and Communication in the Social Sciences and Humanities)

►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 3835 KiB  

Open AccessArticle

Perception and Ethical Challenges for the Future of AI as Encountered by Surveyed New Engineers

by Hisham O. Khogali and Samir Mekid

Societies 2024, 14(12), 271; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14120271 - 18 Dec 2024

Viewed by 3133

Abstract

Our extensive history of embracing AI technological advances demonstrates that AI may be a useful tool if humans learn to use it intelligently, and that concerns about it replacing human occupations may be unwarranted. Indeed, a range of remarkable new AI approaches are [...] Read more.

Our extensive history of embracing AI technological advances demonstrates that AI may be a useful tool if humans learn to use it intelligently, and that concerns about it replacing human occupations may be unwarranted. Indeed, a range of remarkable new AI approaches are fast transforming diverse human experiences and fundamentally disrupting our lives, but not without some drawbacks. This study reflects on how new engineers view AI’s influence on trust and ethical attitudes. Data-driven perceptions drive educated debates, education initiatives, and legislative decisions aimed at effectively addressing non-scientific AI concerns. This contributes to improving the future of AI-based learning through transdisciplinary research that considers the evidence of ethical challenges raised by AI misapplication. Our analysis of quantitative data from a survey of 715 recently graduated engineers from diverse fields, who often use information technologies, reveals that many believed AI-related difficulties were scientifically uncertain. According to this study’s findings, the observed variance in the trend relating to reduced fear of job losses due to AI (R² = 0.1121) suggests that specialties heavily impacted by crucial decision making have a lower level of fear. This provides strong evidence for an optimistic path to AI breakthroughs boosting the level of confidence in and acceptance of AI across many industries. Full article

(This article belongs to the Topic The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Research and Communication in the Social Sciences and Humanities)

►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less

Select all

Export citation of selected articles as:

Plain Text BibTeX BibTeX (without abstracts) Endnote Endnote (without abstracts) Tab-delimited RIS

 

Error

Oops... you haven't selected anything for export.

Ok

clear

Displaying articles 1-2