Topic Editors

Department of Forest Mycology and Pathology, Uppsala BioCenter, P.O. Box 7026, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
Soils and Natural Resources Department, Spectroscopy Laboratory (Vis-IF) and Sustainable Soil Management, Faculty of Agronomy, University of Concepcion, Vicente Mendez 3812120, Chile

New Insights into Plant Biotic and Abiotic Stress

Abstract submission deadline
30 April 2026
Manuscript submission deadline
30 June 2026
Viewed by
224

Topic Information

Dear Colleagues,

Currently, the world faces an increased frequency of drought and heat waves and the appearance of new diseases. By the end of the century, crop production will need to increase by 50% to meet the anticipated food demand and encounter the challenges caused by climate change. In addition to global concerns over food insecurity, future agriculture must meet a considerable number of other grand challenges, including becoming more sustainable, and biofortifying the ecosystems’ biodiversity.

It is urgent to develop alternatives to current agricultural systems that highly depend on agrochemicals and water. Understanding how microbiomes influence the fitness network of crops, grassland plants, and soil health under global change is pivotal for developing sustainable agricultural strategies.

It has been suggested that microbiomes, via multiple cascades, define plant phenotypes, including stress tolerance, as well as providing genetic variability (biodiversity). Plant and soil signals affect interaction with microbial communities and hence are also relevant for making more efficient the benefits of treatments with microbial biostimulants for improving tolerance to biotic and abiotic stress. These signals are related to the production of specific compounds and expression of specific genes. However, what specific mechanisms underlie their effect on plant-microbiome interaction and how they make microbiomes highly efficient, are all still largely unanswered questions.

Therefore, information about these mechanisms, identification of the compounds and genes involved, and what regulatory mechanisms affect plant–soil-microbiome interactions, are essential for understanding which features can increase the beneficial effect of microbiome treatment.

We encourage contributions that advance our understanding of these critical issues, fostering dialogue and innovation to support the long-term health and resilience of agro-ecosystems.

Dr. Salme Timmusk
Dr. Erick Zagal
Topic Editors

Keywords

  • plant biotic stress
  • plant abiotic stress
  • drought
  • microbial biostimulant
  • stress tolerance
  • genes
  • plant physiology

Participating Journals

Journal Name Impact Factor CiteScore Launched Year First Decision (median) APC
Crops
crops
1.9 2.4 2021 22.4 Days CHF 1200 Submit
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
ijms
4.9 9.0 2000 17.8 Days CHF 2900 Submit
Stresses
stresses
- 6.9 2021 22 Days CHF 1200 Submit
International Journal of Plant Biology
ijpb
- 3.0 2010 17 Days CHF 1400 Submit

Preprints.org is a multidisciplinary platform offering a preprint service designed to facilitate the early sharing of your research. It supports and empowers your research journey from the very beginning.

MDPI Topics is collaborating with Preprints.org and has established a direct connection between MDPI journals and the platform. Authors are encouraged to take advantage of this opportunity by posting their preprints at Preprints.org prior to publication:

  1. Share your research immediately: disseminate your ideas prior to publication and establish priority for your work.
  2. Safeguard your intellectual contribution: Protect your ideas with a time-stamped preprint that serves as proof of your research timeline.
  3. Boost visibility and impact: Increase the reach and influence of your research by making it accessible to a global audience.
  4. Gain early feedback: Receive valuable input and insights from peers before submitting to a journal.
  5. Ensure broad indexing: Web of Science (Preprint Citation Index), Google Scholar, Crossref, SHARE, PrePubMed, Scilit and Europe PMC.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Journals
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
20 pages, 3232 KB  
Article
Comparative Analysis of VOC Profiles in Populus deltoides cv. Harvard I-63/51 and P. × canadensis cv. Conti 12 Poplars Attacked by Megaplatypus mutatus
by Celeste Arancibia, Laura Mitjans, María Victoria Bertoldi, Andrés Morales, Magdalena Gantuz, Leonardo Bolcato, Patricia Piccoli, Natalia Naves, Juan Alberto Bustamante and Ricardo Williams Masuelli
Stresses 2026, 6(1), 6; https://doi.org/10.3390/stresses6010006 (registering DOI) - 31 Jan 2026
Abstract
Megaplatypus mutatus, a major poplar pest in South America, tunnels into the xylem, weakening trunks and reducing wood quality. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are key mediators of plant–insect interactions and may reflect genotype-specific defence strategies. This study analysed VOC profiles of young [...] Read more.
Megaplatypus mutatus, a major poplar pest in South America, tunnels into the xylem, weakening trunks and reducing wood quality. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are key mediators of plant–insect interactions and may reflect genotype-specific defence strategies. This study analysed VOC profiles of young and adult Populus deltoides cv. Harvard and P. × canadensis cv. Conti 12 under natural M. mutatus infestation. Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry putatively annotated 31 VOCs, including green leaf volatiles (GLVs), pentyl leaf volatiles (PLVs), terpenes, alcohols, aromatics and phenolics, 12 of which, to our knowledge, have not been previously reported in Populus VOC profiles. Harvard trees showed ~14.5-fold higher total VOC abundance than Conti trees. In Conti, constitutive VOC emissions remained stable regardless of infestation status or age. In contrast, under infestation, Harvard trees emitted10-fold higher constitutive VOCs than non-infested Harvard trees and ~52-fold higher than Conti, a pattern consistent with increased defensive activity. GLVs and PLVs relatively dominated both genotypes, although Harvard showed higher emissions. Terpenes were not detected in young Conti trees under our analytical conditions but were abundant and diverse in infested Harvard trees, which may indicate a stronger terpene-associated response in this clone. Several compounds were detected only under specific genotype–condition combinations in our dataset and therefore represent candidate volatiles for future behavioural and functional studies. These results are consistent with differences in VOC emission patterns between genotypes and age classes, improve our understanding of putative chemical cues in the interaction between Populus and M. mutatus, and provide a basis for future work towards sustainable pest management strategies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic New Insights into Plant Biotic and Abiotic Stress)
Back to TopTop