Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (155)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = smallpox vaccines

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
15 pages, 288 KiB  
Systematic Review
Interventions to Improve Vaccination Uptake Among Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Anelisa Jaca, Lindi Mathebula, Thobile Malinga, Kimona Rampersadh, Masibulele Zulu, Ameer Steven-Jorg Hohlfeld, Charles Shey Wiysonge, Julie C. Jacobson Vann and Duduzile Ndwandwe
Vaccines 2025, 13(8), 811; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13080811 - 30 Jul 2025
Viewed by 246
Abstract
Background: Immunization is a highly effective intervention for controlling over 20 life-threatening infectious diseases, significantly reducing both morbidity and mortality rates. One notable achievement in vaccination efforts was the global eradication of smallpox, which the World Health Assembly declared on 8 May 1980. [...] Read more.
Background: Immunization is a highly effective intervention for controlling over 20 life-threatening infectious diseases, significantly reducing both morbidity and mortality rates. One notable achievement in vaccination efforts was the global eradication of smallpox, which the World Health Assembly declared on 8 May 1980. Additionally, there has been a remarkable 99.9% reduction in wild poliovirus cases since 1988, decreasing from more than 350,000 cases that year to just 30 cases in 2022. Objectives: The objective of this review was to assess the effects of various interventions designed to increase vaccination uptake among adults. Search Methods: A thorough search was conducted in the CENTRAL, Embase Ovid, Medline Ovid, PubMed, Web of Science, and Global Index Medicus databases for primary studies. This search was conducted in August 2021 and updated in November 2024. Selection Criteria: Randomized trials were eligible for inclusion in this review, regardless of publication status or language. Data Analysis: Two authors independently screened the search outputs to select potentially eligible studies. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for each randomized controlled trial (RCT). A meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model, and the quality of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. Main Results: A total of 35 randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review, with the majority conducted in the United States. The interventions targeted adults aged 18 and older who were eligible for vaccination, involving a total of 403,709 participants. The overall pooled results for interventions aimed at increasing influenza vaccination showed a risk ratio of 1.41 (95% CI: 1.15, 1.73). Most studies focused on influenza vaccination (18 studies), while the remaining studies examined various other vaccines, including those for hepatitis A, COVID-19, hepatitis B, pneumococcal disease, tetanus, diphtheria, pertussis (Tdap), herpes zoster, and human papillomavirus (HPV). The results indicate that letter reminders were slightly effective in increasing influenza vaccination uptake compared to the control group (RR: 1.75, 95% CI: 0.97, 1.16; 6 studies; 161,495 participants; low-certainty evidence). Additionally, participants who received education interventions showed increased levels of influenza vaccination uptake compared to those in the control group (RR: 1.88, 95% CI: 0.61, 5.76; 3 studies; 1318 participants; low-certainty evidence). Furthermore, tracking and outreach interventions also led to an increase in influenza vaccination uptake (RR: 1.87, 95% CI: 0.78, 4.46; 2 studies; 33,752 participants; low-certainty evidence). Conclusions: Letter reminders and educational interventions targeted at recipients are effective in increasing vaccination uptake compared to control groups. Full article
8 pages, 1302 KiB  
Communication
Vaccinia and Monkeypox Virus-Neutralizing Antibodies in People Living with HIV: A Serological Study in a Orthopoxvirus-Endemic, Low-Income Region in Brazil
by Thyago José Silva, Ana Gabriella Stoffella-Dutra, Victor Lacerda Gripp, Pollyana R. C. Gorgens, Iago José da Silva Domingos, Pedro Henrique Bastos e Silva, Bruna Caroline Chaves-Garcia, Erna Geessien Kroon, Etel Rocha-Vieira, Giliane de Souza Trindade and Danilo Bretas de Oliveira
Pathogens 2025, 14(8), 733; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14080733 - 25 Jul 2025
Viewed by 307
Abstract
Co-infections of Orthopoxviruses (OPVs), such as vaccinia virus (VACV) and monkeypox virus (MPXV), and the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) can be associated with severe outcomes. Serro’s dairy region, located in Minas Gerais, southeastern Brazil, is an endemic area for VACV, where zoonotic outbreaks [...] Read more.
Co-infections of Orthopoxviruses (OPVs), such as vaccinia virus (VACV) and monkeypox virus (MPXV), and the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) can be associated with severe outcomes. Serro’s dairy region, located in Minas Gerais, southeastern Brazil, is an endemic area for VACV, where zoonotic outbreaks affect rural communities. This epidemiological context is especially relevant for at-risk populations, such as people living with HIV (PLHIV). This study aimed to assess the presence of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) against OPV in PLHIV in this endemic setting. Serum samples were collected from 177 PLHIV in treatment at the specialized service between December 2021 and August 2022. VACV and MPXV NAbs were measured using the plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) and VACV-infected cells. The overall occurrence of OPV NAbs was 27.7%. NAbs were higher in individuals born before 1980 (53.3%) than those born after 1980 (1.1%). Among anti-VACV-seropositive individuals, 40.8% also had MPXV NAbs, suggesting cross-immunity. These findings indicate the circulation of VACV in PLHIV and highlight the increased susceptibility to OPV infections among individuals born after the cessation of smallpox vaccination. The results reinforce the importance of continued surveillance of OPV, especially in endemic regions and vulnerable populations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Emerging Pathogens)
Show Figures

Figure 1

60 pages, 6483 KiB  
Review
The Challenge of Lyssavirus Infections in Domestic and Other Animals: A Mix of Virological Confusion, Consternation, Chagrin, and Curiosity
by Charles E. Rupprecht, Aniruddha V. Belsare, Florence Cliquet, Philip P. Mshelbwala, Janine F. R. Seetahal and Vaughn V. Wicker
Pathogens 2025, 14(6), 586; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14060586 - 13 Jun 2025
Viewed by 2355
Abstract
Lyssaviruses are RNA viruses in the Family Rhabdoviridae, Genus Lyssavirus. They represent the causative agents of acute, progressive encephalitis, known historically as rabies. Regardless of specific etiology, their collective viral morphology, biochemistry, pathobiology, associated clinical signs, diagnosis, epizootiology, and management are essentially [...] Read more.
Lyssaviruses are RNA viruses in the Family Rhabdoviridae, Genus Lyssavirus. They represent the causative agents of acute, progressive encephalitis, known historically as rabies. Regardless of specific etiology, their collective viral morphology, biochemistry, pathobiology, associated clinical signs, diagnosis, epizootiology, and management are essentially the same. Despite centuries of clinical recognition, these quintessential neurotropic agents remain significant pathogens today, with substantive consequences to agriculture, public health, and conservation biology. Notably, the singular morbidity caused by lyssaviruses is incurable and constitutes the highest case fatality of any viral disease. All warm-blooded vertebrates are believed to be susceptible. The dog is the only domestic animal that serves as a reservoir, vector, and victim. In contrast, felids are effective vectors, but not reservoirs. All other rabid domestic species, such as livestock, constitute spillover infections, as a bellwether to local lyssavirus activity. Frequently, professional confusion abounds among the veterinary community, because although the viral species Lyssavirus rabies is inarguably the best-known representative in the Genus, at least 20 other recognized or putative members of this monophyletic group are known. Frequently, this is simply overlooked. Moreover, often the ‘taxonomic etiology’ (i.e., ‘Lyssavirus x’) is mistakenly referenced in a biopolitcal context, instead of the obvious clinical illness (i.e., ‘rabies’). Global consternation persists, if localities believe they are ‘disease-free’, when documented lyssaviruses circulate or laboratory-based surveillance is inadequate to support such claims. Understandably, professional chagrin develops when individuals mistake the epidemiological terminology of control, prevention, elimination, etc. Management is not simple, given that the only licensed veterinary and human vaccines are against rabies virus, sensu lato. There are no adequate antiviral drugs for any lyssaviruses or cross-reactive biologics developed against more distantly related viral members. While representative taxa among the mammalian Orders Chiroptera, Carnivora, and Primates exemplify the major global reservoirs, which mammalian species are responsible for the perpetuation of other lyssaviruses remains a seemingly academic curiosity. This zoonosis is neglected. Clearly, with such underlying characteristics as a fundamental ‘disease of nature’, rabies, unlike smallpox and rinderpest, is not a candidate for eradication. With the worldwide zeal to drive human fatalities from canine rabies viruses to zero by the rapidly approaching year 2030, enhanced surveillance and greater introspection of the poorly appreciated burden posed by rabies virus and diverse other lyssaviruses may manifest as an epidemiological luxury to the overall global program of the future. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Challenges in Veterinary Virology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1014 KiB  
Review
Ocular Manifestations of Mpox and Other Poxvirus Infections: Clinical Insights and Emerging Therapeutic and Preventive Strategies
by Yuan Zong, Yaru Zou, Mingming Yang, Jing Zhang, Zizhen Ye, Jiaxin Deng, Kyoko Ohno-Matsui and Koju Kamoi
Vaccines 2025, 13(5), 546; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13050546 - 21 May 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1083
Abstract
Poxvirus infections, particularly those caused by the monkeypox virus, have emerged as significant public health threats. Ocular manifestations constitute a severe potential clinical complication associated with these infections, potentially resulting in permanent visual impairment in afflicted patients. This review aimed to examine the [...] Read more.
Poxvirus infections, particularly those caused by the monkeypox virus, have emerged as significant public health threats. Ocular manifestations constitute a severe potential clinical complication associated with these infections, potentially resulting in permanent visual impairment in afflicted patients. This review aimed to examine the clinical spectrum of ocular manifestations associated with mpox and other poxvirus infections and to evaluate current management strategies alongside emerging therapeutic interventions and prevention strategies. A comprehensive literature search was performed across major databases to identify studies reporting ocular involvement in poxviral infections. Ocular involvement in poxviral infections ranges from mild conjunctivitis and eyelid lesions to severe keratitis with potential vision loss. Mpox-related ocular manifestations are more prevalent in unvaccinated and immunocompromised individuals. Although early antiviral intervention and supportive care are critical, clinical outcomes vary considerably across viral clades. Emerging evidence indicates that tecovirimat may reduce lesion severity, although its impact on accelerating recovery remains limited. Moreover, vaccine strategies, particularly the MVA-BN (JYNNEOS) vaccine, appear to decrease ocular complications, despite regional disparities in access and implementation. Ocular complications pose a significant clinical challenge in mpox and related poxviral infections. This review highlights the need for early diagnosis and integrated treatment approaches that combine antiviral therapy, supportive care, and targeted vaccination. Further research is essential to refine treatment protocols and assess the long-term outcomes in diverse patient populations. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1177 KiB  
Article
Differences in Mpox and Vaccinia Immunity Induced by Non-Replicating and Replicating Vaccinia-Based Vaccines
by Getahun Abate, Krystal Meza, Yinyi Yu, Chase Colbert, Anna Jaunarajs, Azra Blazevic, Daniel F. Hoft and Sharon E. Frey
Vaccines 2025, 13(5), 520; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13050520 - 14 May 2025
Viewed by 690
Abstract
Background: The recent global outbreak with clade IIb and the concurrent emergence of clade I mpox virus in Africa show that mpox is a challenging problem. MVA-BN induces low-level mpox-neutralizing antibody responses that wane rapidly. This study was conducted to compare the [...] Read more.
Background: The recent global outbreak with clade IIb and the concurrent emergence of clade I mpox virus in Africa show that mpox is a challenging problem. MVA-BN induces low-level mpox-neutralizing antibody responses that wane rapidly. This study was conducted to compare the mpox immunity induced by a replication-competent smallpox vaccine and non-replicating MVA-BN. Methods: Stored sera (n = 302) and PBMCs (n = 244) collected pre-vaccination and at five post-vaccination time points in MVA-BN and six post-vaccination time points in Dryvax clinical trials were used. Antibody titers that neutralized at least 50% of mpox in cell culture were determined by the focus reduction neutralization test (FRNT) 50, and the mpox-specific T cell responses were measured using an IFN-γ ELISPOT assay. Results: The peak geometric fold rise (95% CI) (i.e., the maximum GMFR across all study visits) in the mpox FRNT50 for subcutaneous (SC) MVA-BN, intradermal (ID) MVA-BN, and Dryvax was 22.1 (8.3, 59.1), 18.5 (8.0, 43.1), and 245.8 (100.4, 601.6), respectively. The GMFR at day 180 post-vaccination for MVA-BN (SC), MVA-BN (ID), and Dryvax was 2.4, 2.7, and 64, respectively. The mean (95% CI) peak number of mpox-specific IFN-γ-producing SFCs was 127 (43.1, 238.3), 87.3 (46, 137), and 61.2 (44.3, 77.7) for MVA-BN (SC), MVA-BN (ID), and Dryvax, respectively. On day 180, the mean SFCs in the three groups decreased to 10.8 (−34.4, 3.8), 3.3 (−6.2, 18.6), and 2.2 (−9, 12.5), respectively. Conclusions: The peak mpox-neutralizing antibody titer was >10-fold lower in MVA-BN recipients compared to those who received a replication-competent smallpox vaccine, and the level at day 180 was >20 times lower in MVA-BN recipients. MVA-BN induced similar or higher T cell responses. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Vaccines against Tropical and other Infectious Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1621 KiB  
Review
Recent Advances in Mpox Epidemic: Global Features and Vaccine Prevention Research
by Xinling Zhang, Dong-Ang Liu, Yuting Qiu, Ruiyao Hu, Shiyu Chen, Yue Xu, Keyi Chen, Jinghua Yuan and Xiaoping Li
Vaccines 2025, 13(5), 466; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13050466 - 25 Apr 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 982
Abstract
Monkeypox (mpox) is a zoonotic disease (zoonose) caused by the monkeypox virus (MPXV). MPXV, a member of the Orthopoxviridae family, is categorized into two clades, Central Africa (I) and West Africa (II), each of which is further subdivided into subclades a and b. [...] Read more.
Monkeypox (mpox) is a zoonotic disease (zoonose) caused by the monkeypox virus (MPXV). MPXV, a member of the Orthopoxviridae family, is categorized into two clades, Central Africa (I) and West Africa (II), each of which is further subdivided into subclades a and b. Clade I generally causes more serious illness and higher mortality rates, while Clade II results in milder illness. Historically, mpox epidemics were localized to specific regions and countries in Africa. Since 2022, the mpox epidemic, fueled by MPXV Clade IIb, has swiftly spread across various nations and regions, jeopardizing public health and safety. However, starting in 2024, Clade Ib gradually replaced Clade IIb. The notable genetic variation in Clade Ib may provide MPXV with new opportunities to evade the immune system and adapt to hosts. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), from 1 January 2022, to 24 November 2024, there were 117,663 confirmed cases and 2 probable cases, resulting in 263 deaths across 127 Member States in all six WHO regions. As of 9 January 2025, 12 countries outside Africa have reported imported MPXV Clade Ib cases, with secondary cases emerging in the United Kingdom, Germany, and China. Due to the incomplete development of a vaccine specifically for MPXV, the smallpox vaccine remains in use for preventing mpox or for emergency vaccination post-exposure. Therefore, the persistent spread of mpox is still a major concern, requiring greater awareness and vaccination efforts in populations at high risk. This paper aims to summarize the etiological characteristics, epidemic situation, and vaccine prevention efforts for mpox, offering a reference for managing this serious epidemic and ensuring effective scientific prevention and control. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Epidemiology and Vaccination)
Show Figures

Figure 1

58 pages, 1586 KiB  
Review
Safety and Efficacy of Vaccination During Lactation: A Comprehensive Review of Vaccines for Maternal and Infant Health Utilizing a Large Language Model Citation Screening System
by Sien J. Mulleners, Hannah G. Juncker, Jan Zuiderveld, Kirsten A. Ziesemer, Johannes B. van Goudoever and Britt J. van Keulen
Vaccines 2025, 13(4), 350; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13040350 - 25 Mar 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3260
Abstract
Newborns are born with an immature immune system, making them susceptible to infections early in life. Human milk provides essential nutrients and immunological factors that support infant immunity. Maternal vaccination during lactation has the potential to enhance these benefits by triggering an immune [...] Read more.
Newborns are born with an immature immune system, making them susceptible to infections early in life. Human milk provides essential nutrients and immunological factors that support infant immunity. Maternal vaccination during lactation has the potential to enhance these benefits by triggering an immune response in the mother, potentially extending protection to her child. However, lactating individuals are often excluded from vaccine trials, leading to uncertainties about vaccine safety and efficacy during the postpartum period. This study critically evaluates the effectiveness of vaccines in enhancing the immune-supporting properties of human milk and assesses their safety and efficacy for lactating mothers and their infants. By examining potential benefits alongside safety concerns, we aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of postpartum vaccination’s impact on maternal and infant health. We utilized large-language models (LLMs) to enhance the review process and performed a structured literature search across Ovid/Medline, Embase, and Clarivate Analytics using terms like “breastfeeding”, “postpartum”, and “vaccination”. A three-stage screening process involving human and LLM-assisted evaluation focused on postpartum vaccines and their implications for maternal and infant health. We identified 73 studies covering vaccines against COVID-19, cholera, influenza, pertussis, pneumococcal, rabies, polio, rotavirus, rubella, varicella, typhoid, smallpox, and yellow fever. Most vaccines, such as those for COVID-19 and influenza, appear safe and effective for postpartum use without requiring precautionary measures. However, caution is advised with vaccines such as the yellow fever vaccine, where temporary breastfeeding cessation is recommended. Overall, this review underscores the compatibility of most vaccines with lactation and suggests its benefits for both mother and infant. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Women and Children)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 200 KiB  
Review
Vaccines and Antiviral Therapies for Mpox Virus in Pregnant and Breastfeeding Women: Efficacy and Maternal–Child Outcomes
by Maryum Imran, Myra Sohail, Javeria Kamran, Syeda Qaima Abbas, Khadija Azeem and Emmanuel Korir
Viruses 2025, 17(4), 456; https://doi.org/10.3390/v17040456 - 22 Mar 2025
Viewed by 673
Abstract
Mpox (formerly known as monkeypox), the major public health concern of 2022, has elicited much attention globally. In addition to the usual symptoms observed in smallpox virus infections, infected mothers were found to hold a possible risk of transmission to newborns during delivery. [...] Read more.
Mpox (formerly known as monkeypox), the major public health concern of 2022, has elicited much attention globally. In addition to the usual symptoms observed in smallpox virus infections, infected mothers were found to hold a possible risk of transmission to newborns during delivery. This review aimed to summarize recent clinical trials that involved antiviral therapy, vaccines, immunoglobulin therapy, and other pharmacological interventions specifically for treating infected pregnant women. A comprehensive search was performed using databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, and Medline to find appropriate disease management strategies. Amongst the vaccines and antivirals being used for treatment, vaccines such as Modified Vaccinia Ankara (MVA/MVA-BN) and Lister clone 16-medium pocket size-8 (LC16m8), while prophylactically effective, have been deemed unsafe for pregnant and lactating females. Antivirals like Tecovirimat, on the other hand, are considered to be a better alternative, but they are not without risks that may outweigh the potential benefits. Additionally, efforts to reduce maternal and fetal complications include administering the MVA-BN vaccine and awareness campaigns regarding herd immunity. Therefore, necessary precautions, prophylactic vaccinations in high-risk outbreak regions, and symptomatic treatment in pregnant and lactating females currently appear to be more feasible approaches against the mpox virus. Full article
15 pages, 4398 KiB  
Article
Elucidating the Mechanism of VVTT Infection Through Machine Learning and Transcriptome Analysis
by Zhili Chen, Yongxin Jiang, Jiazhen Cui, Wannan Li, Weiwei Han and Gang Liu
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(3), 1203; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26031203 - 30 Jan 2025
Viewed by 1422
Abstract
The vaccinia virus (VV) is extensively utilized as a vaccine vector in the treatment of various infectious diseases, cardiovascular diseases, immunodeficiencies, and cancers. The vaccinia virus Tiantan strain (VVTT) has been instrumental as an irreplaceable vaccine strain in the eradication of smallpox in [...] Read more.
The vaccinia virus (VV) is extensively utilized as a vaccine vector in the treatment of various infectious diseases, cardiovascular diseases, immunodeficiencies, and cancers. The vaccinia virus Tiantan strain (VVTT) has been instrumental as an irreplaceable vaccine strain in the eradication of smallpox in China; however, it still presents significant adverse toxic effects. After the WHO recommended that routine smallpox vaccination be discontinued, the Chinese government stopped the national smallpox vaccination program in 1981. The outbreak of monkeypox in 2022 has focused people’s attention on the Orthopoxvirus. However, there are limited reports on the safety and toxic side effects of VVTT. In this study, we employed a combination of transcriptomic analysis and machine learning-based feature selection to identify key genes implicated in the VVTT infection process. We utilized four machine learning algorithms, including random forest (RF), minimum redundancy maximum relevance (MRMR), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator cross-validation (LASSOCV), for feature selection. Among these, XGB was found to be the most effective and was used for further screening, resulting in an optimal model with an ROC curve of 0.98. Our analysis revealed the involvement of pathways such as spinocerebellar ataxia and the p53 signaling pathway. Additionally, we identified three critical targets during VVTT infection—ARC, JUNB, and EGR2—and further validated these targets using qPCR. Our research elucidates the mechanism by which VVTT infects cells, enhancing our understanding of the smallpox vaccine. This knowledge not only facilitates the development of new and more effective vaccines but also contributes to a deeper comprehension of viral pathogenesis. By advancing our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying VVTT infection, this study lays the foundation for the further development of VVTT. Such insights are crucial for strengthening global health security and ensuring a resilient response to future pandemics. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

13 pages, 627 KiB  
Review
Approaches to Next-Generation Capripoxvirus and Monkeypox Virus Vaccines
by Anna-Lise Williamson
Viruses 2025, 17(2), 186; https://doi.org/10.3390/v17020186 - 27 Jan 2025
Viewed by 1600
Abstract
Globally, there are two major poxvirus outbreaks: mpox, caused by the monkeypox virus, and lumpy skin disease, caused by the lumpy skin disease virus. While vaccines for both diseases exist, there is a need for improved vaccines. The original vaccines used to eradicate [...] Read more.
Globally, there are two major poxvirus outbreaks: mpox, caused by the monkeypox virus, and lumpy skin disease, caused by the lumpy skin disease virus. While vaccines for both diseases exist, there is a need for improved vaccines. The original vaccines used to eradicate smallpox, which also protect from the disease now known as mpox, are no longer acceptable. This is mainly due to the risk of serious adverse events, particularly in HIV-positive people. The next-generation vaccine for mpox prevention is modified vaccinia Ankara, which does not complete the viral replication cycle in humans and, therefore, has a better safety profile. However, two modified vaccinia Ankara immunizations are needed to give good but often incomplete protection, and there are indications that the immune response will wane over time. A better vaccine that induces a long-lived response with only one immunization is desirable. Another recently available smallpox vaccine is LC16m8. While LC16m8 contains replicating vaccinia virus, it is a more attenuated vaccine than the original vaccines and has limited side effects. The commonly used lumpy skin disease vaccines are based on attenuated lumpy skin disease virus. However, an inactivated or non-infectious vaccine is desirable as the disease spreads into new territories. This article reviews novel vaccine approaches, including mRNA and subunit vaccines, to protect from poxvirus infection. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

34 pages, 440 KiB  
Review
Vaccines in Dermatology—Present and Future: A Review
by Eyan Goh, Jean-Marc Chavatte, Raymond T. P. Lin, Lisa F. P. Ng, Laurent Rénia and Hazel H. Oon
Vaccines 2025, 13(2), 125; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13020125 - 26 Jan 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2168
Abstract
Dermatological vaccines have emerged as critical tools in preventing and managing a wide spectrum of skin conditions ranging from infectious diseases to malignancies. By synthesizing evidence from existing literature, this review aims to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of vaccines used [...] Read more.
Dermatological vaccines have emerged as critical tools in preventing and managing a wide spectrum of skin conditions ranging from infectious diseases to malignancies. By synthesizing evidence from existing literature, this review aims to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of vaccines used in dermatology, including both approved vaccines and those currently being researched. Vaccines discussed in this paper include those targeting dermatoses and malignancies (e.g., acne vulgaris, atopic dermatitis, and melanoma); infectious diseases (e.g., human papillomavirus (HPV); varicella zoster virus (VZV); herpes zoster (HZ); warts; smallpox; mpox (monkeypox); hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD); candidiasis and Group B Streptococcus (GBS); and neglected tropical diseases (e.g., Buruli ulcer, leprosy, and leishmaniasis). Through this review, we aim to provide a detailed understanding of the role of vaccines in dermatology, identify knowledge gaps, and propose areas for future research. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vaccines and Therapeutic Approaches in Dermatological Diseases)
23 pages, 2519 KiB  
Review
Comprehensive Insights into Monkeypox (mpox): Recent Advances in Epidemiology, Diagnostic Approaches and Therapeutic Strategies
by Suresh Kumar, Dhanyashri Guruparan, Kalimuthu Karuppanan and K. J. Senthil Kumar
Pathogens 2025, 14(1), 1; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14010001 - 26 Dec 2024
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 3114
Abstract
Monkeypox (mpox) is a viral infection closely related to smallpox, manifesting as a milder febrile rash in affected individuals. Over the past two decades, the incidence of mpox has surged, possibly linked to a declining immunity against the smallpox vaccine worldwide. Recent outbreaks [...] Read more.
Monkeypox (mpox) is a viral infection closely related to smallpox, manifesting as a milder febrile rash in affected individuals. Over the past two decades, the incidence of mpox has surged, possibly linked to a declining immunity against the smallpox vaccine worldwide. Recent outbreaks of mpox in multiple countries have sparked concerns regarding altered transmission patterns and the potential for a global menace. In this article, we present a multidimensional review encompassing the latest scientific discoveries, illuminating the intricate structure of the human mpox virus. Key findings include advancements in understanding the virus’s molecular mechanisms, which highlight its genetic adaptability and potential for zoonotic spillover. Diagnostic innovations, such as improved molecular assays, have enhanced detection accuracy, while novel therapeutic strategies, including antiviral drugs and vaccines, show promise in mitigating outbreaks. Our conclusions emphasize the importance of robust surveillance systems, vaccination programs, and rapid response strategies to curb mpox’s spread. Future recommendations include strengthening global collaboration for zoonotic disease surveillance, advancing the research on host–pathogen interactions, and developing next-generation therapeutics to address this emerging public health threat effectively. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Epidemiology of Emerging Viruses)
Show Figures

Figure 1

45 pages, 612 KiB  
Review
Development of Effective Medical Countermeasures Against the Main Biowarfare Agents: The Importance of Antibodies
by Arnaud Avril, Sophie Guillier and Christine Rasetti-Escargueil
Microorganisms 2024, 12(12), 2622; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12122622 - 18 Dec 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3733
Abstract
The COVID-19 and mpox crisis has reminded the world of the potentially catastrophic consequences of biological agents. Aside from the natural risk, biological agents can also be weaponized or used for bioterrorism. Dissemination in a population or among livestock could be used to [...] Read more.
The COVID-19 and mpox crisis has reminded the world of the potentially catastrophic consequences of biological agents. Aside from the natural risk, biological agents can also be weaponized or used for bioterrorism. Dissemination in a population or among livestock could be used to destabilize a nation by creating a climate of terror, by negatively impacting the economy and undermining institutions. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) classify biological agents into three categories (A or Tier 1, B and C) according to the risk they pose to the public and national security. Category A or Tier 1 consists of the six pathogens with the highest risk to the population (Bacillus anthracis, Yersinia pestis, Francisella tularensis, botulinum neurotoxins, smallpox and viral hemorrhagic fevers). Several medical countermeasures, such as vaccines, antibodies and chemical drugs, have been developed to prevent or cure the diseases induced by these pathogens. This review presents an overview of the primary medical countermeasures, and in particular, of the antibodies available against the six pathogens on the CDC’s Tier 1 agents list, as well as against ricin. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Latest Review Papers in Medical Microbiology 2024)
23 pages, 2809 KiB  
Review
Mpox Virus Infection and Vaccination: Immunopathogenesis and Exploring the Link to Neuropsychiatric Manifestations
by Helal F. Hetta, Ahmad A. Alharbi, Shumukh M. Alsharif, Tala T. Alkindy, Alanoud Alkhamali, Abdullah S. Albalawi, Hager Hamdy Sayed, Moaiad Eldin Ahmed Mohamed, Yasmine Adel Mohammed, Yasmin N. Ramadan and Reem Sayad
Immuno 2024, 4(4), 578-600; https://doi.org/10.3390/immuno4040034 - 2 Dec 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2293
Abstract
Background and Aim: Monkeypox (Mpox) is a viral disease mainly found in central and western Africa, with symptoms similar to variola virus (smallpox) but distinguished by the early lymph node swelling specific to Mpox. This review summarizes the neuropsychiatric manifestations of Mpox infection [...] Read more.
Background and Aim: Monkeypox (Mpox) is a viral disease mainly found in central and western Africa, with symptoms similar to variola virus (smallpox) but distinguished by the early lymph node swelling specific to Mpox. This review summarizes the neuropsychiatric manifestations of Mpox infection and vaccination, along with management approaches. Method: We searched different databases such as PubMed, Scopus, WoS, and Google Scholar about the neuropsychiatric manifestations of Mpox disease and the associated strategies of management. Results and conclusions: Mpox can cause a wide range of neurological symptoms. These range from mild symptoms like headaches, muscle aches, fatigue, and pain to severe symptoms, including seizures, blindness, photophobia, delirium, coma, encephalitis, and transverse myelitis. It is essential to distinguish Mpox from smallpox and other orthopox viruses. Psychiatric issues, such as stigma, disfigurement, isolation, and physical pain, are common in Mpox patients. To address these, healthcare providers should provide accurate information, counseling, and virtual support. Neurological side effects were associated with the previous smallpox vaccine, which offered cross-protection against Mpox. This vaccine has since been replaced by JYNNEOS, which does not pose any neurological risks. Mpox-related neurological symptoms are generally managed with supportive care, including NSAIDs, antibiotics, antiepileptics, and sedatives for seizures. Antivirals like acyclovir are also used. Severe cases may require hospitalization or intubation. So, we recommend early diagnosis, isolation, and prompt treatment, as Mpox spreading to the central nervous system can lead to serious and potentially fatal complications. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

7 pages, 214 KiB  
Perspective
Developing Correlates of Protection for Vaccines Is Needed More than Ever—Influenza, COVID-19 and RSV Infection
by Zoltan Vajo and Csaba Laszlofy
Viruses 2024, 16(11), 1671; https://doi.org/10.3390/v16111671 - 25 Oct 2024
Viewed by 1701
Abstract
One of the greatest success stories of modern medicine is the prevention of infectious diseases by vaccination, most notably against smallpox and poliomyelitis. However, recent events, such as the 2009–2010 swine flu and the 2020 COVID-19 pandemics, as well as the continued emergence [...] Read more.
One of the greatest success stories of modern medicine is the prevention of infectious diseases by vaccination, most notably against smallpox and poliomyelitis. However, recent events, such as the 2009–2010 swine flu and the 2020 COVID-19 pandemics, as well as the continued emergence of highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses highlighted the fact that we still need to develop new vaccines, and perhaps we should be proactive, rather than reacting to epidemics and pandemics. However, the development of tools for evaluating novel vaccines has not been able to keep up with the rate of vaccine production. Humoral and cellular immune responses to vaccination have both been suggested to be important in preventing infections or ameliorating their consequences, although there is uncertainty regarding their exact roles and importance. This, together with the rapid development of new vaccines, means that the need for developing immunogenicity parameters, and even more importantly, reliable correlates of protection, is more important than ever. Full article
Back to TopTop