Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (13)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = robotic nephroureterectomy

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
9 pages, 489 KB  
Review
Early Clinical Outcomes of the Novel Hinotori Robotic System in Urological Surgery—A Review of Existing Literature
by Simone Meiqi Ong, Hong Min Peng, Wei Zheng So and Ho Yee Tiong
Soc. Int. Urol. J. 2025, 6(4), 56; https://doi.org/10.3390/siuj6040056 - 19 Aug 2025
Viewed by 2090
Abstract
Robotic-assisted surgery has gradually established its role in uro-oncological cases that demand a high level of precision, optimising surgeon ergonomics and decreasing fatigue whilst maintaining optimal clinical outcomes. With the novel Hinotori surgical robot (Medicaroid Corporation (Kobe, Hyogo, Japan)) launched in Japan back [...] Read more.
Robotic-assisted surgery has gradually established its role in uro-oncological cases that demand a high level of precision, optimising surgeon ergonomics and decreasing fatigue whilst maintaining optimal clinical outcomes. With the novel Hinotori surgical robot (Medicaroid Corporation (Kobe, Hyogo, Japan)) launched in Japan back in 2019, it has now demonstrated its use case across various clinical series of different surgeries. We sought to narratively synthesise the initial feasibility of the Hinotori robotic system in urology. A systematic, comprehensive literature search was conducted across various databases from September 2024 to October 2024. Relevant keywords within the scope of this study were generated for a more accurate search. After exclusion and removal of duplicates, a total of nine articles were included for review. Among the included studies, one study reported data solely on radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer, two studies reported on robotic-assisted nephroureterectomy for renal tumours, two studies reported on partial nephrectomy performed for renal masses, two studies reported on radical nephrectomy carried out for renal malignancies and one study reported on robotic-assisted adrenalectomy for adrenal cancer. Lastly, one study collectively reported on outcomes pertaining to partial nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy, vesicourethral anastomosis and pelvic lymph node dissection in a porcine model, as well as partial nephrectomy, radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection in cadavers. The current literature supports its non-inferiority to the well-established Da Vinci system, with no major drawbacks or concerns identified when comparing parameters such as intraoperative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), perioperative events (transfusions, conversion to open surgery), length of hospital stay and major postoperative complications. Future studies involving larger cohorts and more complex surgical cases are essential to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Hinotori system. The new Hinotori robotic system offers unique three-dimensional features as a non-inferior robotic platform alternative that has proven clinically safe thus far in its use. Larger scale studies and randomised trials are eagerly awaited to assess and validate more holistically its clinical utility. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 887 KB  
Article
Prognostic Impact of Adjuvant Immunotherapy in Patients with High-Risk Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer: Results from the ROBUUST 2.0 Collaborative Group
by Maxwell Otiato, Farshad Sheybaee Moghaddam, Alireza Ghoreifi, Riccardo Autorino, Gabriele Bignante, Chandru Sundaram, Daniel Sidhom, Ithaar H. Derweesh, Dhruv Puri, Vitaly Margulis, Benjamin Popokh, Firas Abdollah, Alex Stephens, Matteo Ferro, Giuseppe Simone, Gabriele Tuderti, Reza Mehrazin, Ahmed Eraky, Mark Gonzalgo, Omar Falik Nativ, Zhenjie Wu, Francesco Porpiglia, Enrico N. Checcucci, Andres Correa, Randall Lee, Alessandro Antonelli, Alessandro Veccia, Soroush Rais-Bahrami, Alireza Dehghanmanshadi, Nirmish Singla, Stephan Brönimann, Sisto Perdonà, Roberto Contieri, Takashi Yoshida, James Porter, Saum Ghodoussipour, Luca Lambertini, Andrea Minervini and Hooman Djaladatadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Cancers 2025, 17(13), 2144; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17132144 - 25 Jun 2025
Viewed by 1661
Abstract
Background/Objective: The impact of adjuvant immunotherapy (IO) on the prognosis of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) remains unclear. This study examines the association of adjuvant IO with oncologic outcomes in patients with high-risk UTUC. Methods: This retrospective study reviewed [...] Read more.
Background/Objective: The impact of adjuvant immunotherapy (IO) on the prognosis of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) remains unclear. This study examines the association of adjuvant IO with oncologic outcomes in patients with high-risk UTUC. Methods: This retrospective study reviewed patients with high-risk UTUC treated with adjuvant IO using the ROBotic surgery for Upper tract Urothelial cancer STudy (ROBUUST) database. Propensity-score-matched analysis (nearest-neighbor algorithm, caliper 0.1) was conducted to compare patients receiving adjuvant IO versus those who did not, with matching based on pathologic T and N category and receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Associations between adjuvant IO and urothelial recurrence-free survival (URFS), non-urothelial recurrence-free survival (NRFS), and overall survival (OS) were estimated using a Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Seventy-five patients received adjuvant IO following nephroureterectomy (median four cycles, including eleven (14.7%) nivolumab, thirty-one (41.3%) pembrolizumab, four (5.3%) atezolizumab, and twenty-nine (38.6%) other agents. These patients were matched to 68 patients without adjuvant therapy. Median follow-up times were 17 (IQR, 10–29) months and 20 (9–44) months for IO and no adjuvant therapy, respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed that adjuvant IO was not associated with URFS, NRFS, or OS. Pathologic nodal involvement (HR 7.52, p < 0.001) was the only independent predictor of worse OS. Conclusions: In this real-world retrospective data set, adjuvant IO does not have an impact on oncologic outcomes of UTUC patients following extirpative surgery. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 3209 KB  
Review
New Insights into Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Lessons Learned from the ROBUUST Collaborative Study
by Arianna Biasatti, Gabriele Bignante, Francesco Ditonno, Alessandro Veccia, Riccardo Bertolo, Alessandro Antonelli, Randall Lee, Daniel D. Eun, Vitaly Margulis, Firas Abdollah, Takashi Yoshida, Ithaar H. Derweesh, Margaret F. Meagher, Giuseppe Simone, Gabriele Tuderti, Eugenio Bologna, Reza Mehrazin, Soroush Rais-Bahrami, Chandru P. Sundaram, Courtney Yong, Andrea Minervini, Andrea Mari, Luca Lambertini, Matteo Ferro, Nirmish Singla, Savio D. Pandolfo, Daniele Amparore, Enrico Checcucci, Mark L. Gonzalgo, James R. Porter, Alireza Ghoreifi, Roberto Contieri, Sisto Perdonà, Francesco Porpiglia, Hooman Djaladat, Saum Ghodoussipour and Riccardo Autorinoadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Cancers 2025, 17(10), 1668; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17101668 - 15 May 2025
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2194
Abstract
Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare malignancy, representing only 5–10% of urothelial carcinoma. The mainstay of treatment for high-risk patients is radical nephroureterectomy. Given the aggressive behavior of this disease, additional treatments could be required perioperatively in terms of chemotherapy (CHT), [...] Read more.
Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare malignancy, representing only 5–10% of urothelial carcinoma. The mainstay of treatment for high-risk patients is radical nephroureterectomy. Given the aggressive behavior of this disease, additional treatments could be required perioperatively in terms of chemotherapy (CHT), either in a neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting. On the other hand, low-risk and selected cases can be managed with kidney-sparing surgery (KSS). The ROBotic surgery for Upper tract Urothelial cancer STudy (ROBUUST) is an ongoing international, multicenter registry of patients undergoing surgery for UTUC. After conducting a literature search in February 2025 using the MEDLINE (via PubMed) and Embase databases, we identified 14 studies based on the ROBUUST data analyses. There are several key topics concerning UTUC that remain under debate and were therefore addressed in these studies, focusing on preoperative evaluation and planning, surgical techniques and intraoperative procedures, additional perioperative treatments, and outcomes. The ROBUUST registry has served as a valuable source for a growing body of investigations focusing on various aspects of UTUC treatment planning, decision-making, and outcomes, providing innovative tools and enabling large-scale, novel analyses. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Current Knowledge and Perspectives)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 761 KB  
Article
Robot-Assisted Radical Nephroureterectomy: A Safe and Effective Option for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma, Especially for Novice Surgeons
by Chia-Lun Chang, Chung-You Tsai, Pai-Yu Cheng, Wen-Jeng Wu and Yao-Chou Tsai
Cancers 2025, 17(9), 1394; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17091394 - 22 Apr 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1289
Abstract
Background: Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is the standard treatment for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Minimally invasive techniques like robotic (RARNU) and laparoscopic (LRNU) RNU offer potential benefits over open surgery, but their comparative oncologic outcomes are debated. Methods: This retrospective, multicenter study analyzed [...] Read more.
Background: Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is the standard treatment for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Minimally invasive techniques like robotic (RARNU) and laparoscopic (LRNU) RNU offer potential benefits over open surgery, but their comparative oncologic outcomes are debated. Methods: This retrospective, multicenter study analyzed 2037 Taiwanese patients undergoing RNU between 2010 and 2022. Missing data was addressed using multiple imputations. Overlap weighting was applied to balance patient characteristics between the RARNU and LRNU groups. Survival outcomes were compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression. Results: After excluding the missing data, 405 patients underwent RARNU, and 1262 underwent LRNU. After adjusting for baseline differences, both groups showed comparable rates of surgical complications, residual tumor, UTUC-related mortality, and disease recurrence. The median follow-up was similar (52.4 vs. 51.6 months, p = 0.91). Using Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis, overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and disease-free survival were similar between the two groups. Conclusions: This study shows that RARNU for UTUC has comparable oncological and perioperative outcomes to pure LRNU. RARNU may be easier for surgeons to adopt, particularly those with limited laparoscopic experience. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 573 KB  
Systematic Review
Learning Curves in Robotic Urological Oncological Surgery: Has Anything Changed During the Last Five Years?
by Theodoros Tokas, Charalampos Mavridis, Athanasios Bouchalakis, Chrisoula Maria Nakou and Charalampos Mamoulakis
Cancers 2025, 17(8), 1334; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17081334 - 15 Apr 2025
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2806
Abstract
Background: Despite numerous studies assessing LCs in urological surgical oncology, high-quality evidence and a fully structured curriculum are missing. We aimed to systematically search and review the available literature on the LCs of robot-assisted surgery in urological cancers. Methods: Medline was systematically searched [...] Read more.
Background: Despite numerous studies assessing LCs in urological surgical oncology, high-quality evidence and a fully structured curriculum are missing. We aimed to systematically search and review the available literature on the LCs of robot-assisted surgery in urological cancers. Methods: Medline was systematically searched up to December 2024 to retrieve studies following the Preferred Reporting Items reporting on LC in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC), robot-assisted radical and partial nephrectomy (RARN, RAPN), and robot-assisted radical nephroureterectomy (RANU). The results of the last five years were then compared to those of the previous years. Results: In total, 82 studies were identified, 47 of which were for prostatectomy, 9 of which were for the last 5 years. Eighteen studies referred to partial-nephrectomy, seven over the previous 5 years. Finally, 16 studies referred to radical cystectomy, 7 over the previous five years. For radical prostatectomy, LC was based on operative time (OT), estimated blood loss (EBL), length of hospital stays, complication rate, positive surgical margin (PSM), biochemical recurrence (BCR), continence, and potency with ranges of 100–400, 90–290, 200, 15–250, 50–300, 30–250, 200–500 and 200–300 cases, respectively. For partial nephrectomy, the LC was based on OT, EBL, length of hospital stay, complication rate, warm ischemia time (WIT), and trifecta, with unclear ranges for the first three categories and 20–50, 26–140, and 50–77 cases, respectively, for the rest. Finally, for radical cystectomy, the LC was based on OT, EBL, length of hospital stay, complication rate, PSM, and lymph node yield, with ranges 20–75, 88, 40–198, 16–100, no difference, and 30–50 cases, respectively. We could not identify any study assessing the LCs in RARN and RANU. Conclusions: Robot-assisted surgery does not have a standard definition of LC regardless of the type of operation, which causes heterogeneity between the studies. Nevertheless, LCs appear to be steep and continuous. Training curriculums are essential to optimize outcomes and prepare new surgeons. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights into Robotic Surgery for Urologic Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 775 KB  
Article
Minimally Invasive One-Docking, Two-Target, and Three-Port Robotic-Assisted Nephroureterectomy: Redefining Surgical Approach
by Yarden Zohar, Ben Hefer, Itay Vazana, Muhammad H. Jabareen, Rabea Moed, Elad Mazor, Emilio Charabati, Nimer Alsaraia and Nicola J. Mabjeesh
Cancers 2025, 17(4), 627; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17040627 - 13 Feb 2025
Viewed by 1466
Abstract
Objective: Nephroureterectomy (NU) is a challenging multi-quadrant surgical procedure that involves intra–infra- and retroperitoneal dissection. The introduction of the da Vinci Xi platform has further improved the minimally invasive approach. With the Xi robotic system, single docking for multi-quadrant dissection is now feasible [...] Read more.
Objective: Nephroureterectomy (NU) is a challenging multi-quadrant surgical procedure that involves intra–infra- and retroperitoneal dissection. The introduction of the da Vinci Xi platform has further improved the minimally invasive approach. With the Xi robotic system, single docking for multi-quadrant dissection is now feasible and increasingly popular. Herein, we redefined the surgical technique by optimizing minimal port usage, maximizing template visualization, and utilizing the Xi platform’s retargeting system, based on our experience with 15 patients. Methods: This single-center cohort study was based on the experience of a single surgeon with 15 patients who underwent robotic radical nephroureterectomy (RRNU) between 2019 and 2024, performed via the one docking, three-port technique. Patient data were retrospectively collected and analyzed from the medical records. Results: The cohort’s median age was 79 years, with male predominance of 80%. The median operative time was 133 min, with 60% of procedures completed within 150 min; longer times (>150 min) were due to additional intraoperative non-robotic procedures. Median blood loss was 100 mL, with two patients requiring intraoperative blood transfusion. Lymph node dissection (LND) in six patients did not significantly affect the overall operative time. The intraoperative and major postoperative complication rates (Clavien-Dindo grade > III) were 13.3%. Conclusions: The use of three robotic ports combined with the Xi platform’s camera-hop feature is a safe and effective technique for multi-quadrant, minimally invasive procedures, particularly in RRNU. This approach facilitates procedural goals and reduces overall operative time. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 2056 KB  
Review
Management of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma in a Double Collecting System Kidney
by Yarden Zohar, Bezalel Sivan, Ishai Mintz, Ben Hefer, Keren Rouvinov, Noa Shani Shrem and Nicola J. Mabjeesh
J. Pers. Med. 2024, 14(2), 158; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14020158 - 30 Jan 2024
Viewed by 2601
Abstract
Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) in a duplex collecting system (DCS) is a relatively uncommon presentation with unclear management guidelines. Herein, we retrospectively reviewed all published cases of DCS with UTUC aiming to suggest personalized clinical care options for future cases. We conducted [...] Read more.
Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) in a duplex collecting system (DCS) is a relatively uncommon presentation with unclear management guidelines. Herein, we retrospectively reviewed all published cases of DCS with UTUC aiming to suggest personalized clinical care options for future cases. We conducted a systematic search for all cases of UTUC in DCS from published literature using the following keywords: UTUC, urothelial carcinoma (UC), collecting duct carcinoma, and DCS. The cases were summarized based on demographics, clinical presentation, predisposing risk factors, tumor location, management, and follow-up. We present an additional case based on our experience with a 69-year-old female with high-grade (HG) UTUC of the upper moiety in complete DCS. The patient underwent a robotic upper pole hemi-nephroureterectomy (hemi-NU) with a common sheath distal ureterectomy and a bladder cuff, followed by lower pole ureteral reimplantation. Overall, 34 patients with 35 renal units of UTUC in DCS were included and analyzed. To conclude, UTUC of DCS is rare and underreported. Hence, it is difficult to define a standard treatment. Although hemi-NU has been previously described, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report of robot-assisted hemi-NU for complete DCS with single-moiety UC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Personalized Medicine in Minimally Invasive Urological Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 5742 KB  
Systematic Review
Oncological Efficacy of Robotic Nephroureterectomy vs. Open and Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy for Suspected Non-Metastatic UTUC—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Karthik Rajan, Ahmad Khalifa, Robert Geraghty, Kalpesh Parmar, Gokul KandaSwamy, Juan Gómez Rivas, Bhaskar Somani and Bhavan Prasad Rai
Cancers 2023, 15(20), 4926; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15204926 - 10 Oct 2023
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 2184
Abstract
Introduction and Aims: The optimal approach for nephroureterectomy in patients with suspected UTUC remains a point of debate. In this review, we compare the oncological outcomes of robotic nephroureterectomy (RNU) with open (ONU) or laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU). Methods: All randomized trials and observational [...] Read more.
Introduction and Aims: The optimal approach for nephroureterectomy in patients with suspected UTUC remains a point of debate. In this review, we compare the oncological outcomes of robotic nephroureterectomy (RNU) with open (ONU) or laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU). Methods: All randomized trials and observational studies comparing RNU with ONU and/or LNU for suspected non-metastatic UTUC are included in this review. The systematic review was performed in accordance with the Cochrane Guidelines and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The primary outcome measures were overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), disease-free survival (DFS), and intravesical recurrence-free survival (IV-RFS). The secondary outcome measures were the lymph node dissection (LND) rates, positive margin rates, and the proportion of patients receiving bladder intravesical chemotherapy. Results: We identified 8172 references through our electronic searches and 8 studies through manual searching. A total of 15 studies met the inclusion criteria. The total number of patients in the review was 18,964. RNU had superior OS compared to LNU (HR: 0.81 (95% CI: 0.71, 0.93), p-0.002 (very low certainty)). RNU and ONU had similar OS (HR: 0.83 (95% CI: 0.52, 1.34), p-0.44 (very low certainty)). One study reported an independent association of RNU as a worse predictor of IV-RFS when compared to ONU (HR-1.73 (95% CI: 1.22, 2.45)). The LND rates were higher in the RNU cohort when compared to the LNU cohort (RR 1.24 (95% CI: 1.03, 1.51), p-0.03 (low certainty)). The positive margin rate was lower in the RNU cohort when compared to the ONU cohort (RR 0.29 (95% CI: 0.08, 0.86), p-0.03 (low certainty)). Conclusion: RNU offers comparable oncological efficacy to ONU, except for intravesical recurrence-free survival (IV-RFS). RNU has fewer positive surgical margin rates compared to ONU in well-balanced studies. RNU appears to outperform LNU for certain oncological parameters, such as OS and the proportion of patients who receive lymph node dissections. The quality of evidence comparing surgical techniques for UTUC has remained poor in the last decade. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 1406 KB  
Article
Retroperitoneal Single-Port Robot-Assisted Nephroureterectomy with Bladder Cuff Excision: Initial Experience and Description of the Technique
by Seokhwan Bang, Hyuk Jin Cho, U-Syn Ha, Ji Youl Lee and Sung-Hoo Hong
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(18), 6091; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12186091 - 21 Sep 2023
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 3091
Abstract
Background: With the introduction of the single-port (SP) robot, surgery that was difficult to attempt is becoming possible. Nephroureterectomy (NUx) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma also seems to be able to attempt a retroperitoneal (RP) approach. Purpose: to investigate the feasibility of SP [...] Read more.
Background: With the introduction of the single-port (SP) robot, surgery that was difficult to attempt is becoming possible. Nephroureterectomy (NUx) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma also seems to be able to attempt a retroperitoneal (RP) approach. Purpose: to investigate the feasibility of SP robotic RP NUx with bladder cuff excision. Design, setting, and participants: we sequentially analyzed 20 patients who underwent SP robot NUx from January 2021 to December 2022. Surgical procedure: all patients were diagnosed with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and were operated upon by a single expert using the da Vinci SP platform (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) with retroperitoneal approach. Results and limitations: A total of 20 patients underwent SP robotic NUx with bladder cuff excision. The mean age of patients was 69.45 ± 8.68 years, and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 25.37 ± 3.00 kg/m2. The mean tumor size was 2.42 ± 1.03 cm on a CT scan, with right-sided tumors in eight patients (40%) and left-sided tumors in 12 patients (60%). The median console time was 106 min and 40 s, and the expected blood loss was 122.50 ± 75.18 mL. Final pathology showed that all of the patients were diagnosed as having urothelial carcinoma; one patient was classified as Ta (5.00%), three patients were classified as T1 (15.00%), seven patients were classified as T2 (35.00%), eight patients were classified as T3 (40.00%), and one patient was classified as T4 (5.00%). None of these 20 patients showed any complications based on the Clavien–Dindo scale. Conclusions: SP robotic NUx using a retroperitoneal approach provides feasible perioperative and postoperative outcomes for UTUC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Robot-Assisted Surgery in Urology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1082 KB  
Review
Minimally Invasive Radical Nephroureterectomy: 5-Year Update of Techniques and Outcomes
by Antonio Franco, Francesco Ditonno, Carol Feng, Celeste Manfredi, Morgan R. Sturgis, Mustafa Farooqi, Francesco Del Giudice, Christopher Coogan, Matteo Ferro, Chao Zhang, Zhenjie Wu, Bo Yang, Linhui Wang and Riccardo Autorino
Cancers 2023, 15(18), 4585; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15184585 - 15 Sep 2023
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 3079
Abstract
The gold standard treatment for non-metastatic upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC) is represented by radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). The choice of surgical technique in performing UTUC surgery continues to depend on several factors, including the location and extent of the tumor, the patient’s overall [...] Read more.
The gold standard treatment for non-metastatic upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC) is represented by radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). The choice of surgical technique in performing UTUC surgery continues to depend on several factors, including the location and extent of the tumor, the patient’s overall health, and very importantly, the surgeon’s skill, experience, and preference. Although open and laparoscopic approaches are well-established treatments, evidence regarding robot-assisted radical nephroureterectomy (RANU) is growing. Aim of our study was to perform a critical review on the evidence of the last 5 years regarding surgical techniques and outcomes of minimally invasive RNU, mostly focusing on RANU. Reported oncological and function outcomes suggest that minimally invasive RNU is safe and effective, showing similar survival rates compared to the open approach. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 913 KB  
Article
Comparing Oncological and Perioperative Outcomes of Open versus Laparoscopic versus Robotic Radical Nephroureterectomy for the Treatment of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Multicenter, Multinational, Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
by Nico C. Grossmann, Francesco Soria, Tristan Juvet, Aaron M. Potretzke, Hooman Djaladat, Alireza Ghoreifi, Eiji Kikuchi, Andrea Mari, Zine-Eddine Khene, Kazutoshi Fujita, Jay D. Raman, Alberto Breda, Matteo Fontana, John P. Sfakianos, John L. Pfail, Ekaterina Laukhtina, Pawel Rajwa, Maximillian Pallauf, Cédric Poyet, Giovanni E. Cacciamani, Thomas van Doeveren, Joost L. Boormans, Alessandro Antonelli, Marcus Jamil, Firas Abdollah, Guillaume Ploussard, Axel Heidenreich, Enno Storz, Siamak Daneshmand, Stephen A. Boorjian, Morgan Rouprêt, Michael Rink, Shahrokh F. Shariat and Benjamin Pradereadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Cancers 2023, 15(5), 1409; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15051409 - 23 Feb 2023
Cited by 23 | Viewed by 3486
Abstract
Objectives: To identify correlates of survival and perioperative outcomes of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients undergoing open (ORNU), laparoscopic (LRNU), and robotic (RRNU) radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Methods: We conducted a retrospective, multicenter study that included non-metastatic UTUC patients who underwent RNU between [...] Read more.
Objectives: To identify correlates of survival and perioperative outcomes of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients undergoing open (ORNU), laparoscopic (LRNU), and robotic (RRNU) radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Methods: We conducted a retrospective, multicenter study that included non-metastatic UTUC patients who underwent RNU between 1990–2020. Multiple imputation by chained equations was used to impute missing data. Patients were divided into three groups based on their surgical treatment and were adjusted by 1:1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). Survival outcomes per group were estimated for recurrence-free survival (RFS), bladder recurrence-free survival (BRFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Perioperative outcomes: Intraoperative blood loss, hospital length of stay (LOS), and overall (OPC) and major postoperative complications (MPCs; defined as Clavien–Dindo > 3) were assessed between groups. Results: Of the 2434 patients included, 756 remained after PSM with 252 in each group. The three groups had similar baseline clinicopathological characteristics. The median follow-up was 32 months. Kaplan–Meier and log-rank tests demonstrated similar RFS, CSS, and OS between groups. BRFS was found to be superior with ORNU. Using multivariable regression analyses, LRNU and RRNU were independently associated with worse BRFS (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.22–2.28, p = 0.001 and HR 1.73, 95%CI 1.22–2.47, p = 0.002, respectively). LRNU and RRNU were associated with a significantly shorter LOS (beta −1.1, 95% CI −2.2–0.02, p = 0.047 and beta −6.1, 95% CI −7.2–5.0, p < 0.001, respectively) and fewer MPCs (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.31–0.79, p = 0.003 and OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.16–0.46, p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: In this large international cohort, we demonstrated similar RFS, CSS, and OS among ORNU, LRNU, and RRNU. However, LRNU and RRNU were associated with significantly worse BRFS, but a shorter LOS and fewer MPCs. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1440 KB  
Article
Robotic Radical Nephroureterectomy with Bladder Cuff Excision for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Trend Analysis of Utilization and a Comparative Study
by Hoyoung Bae, Jae Hoon Chung, Wan Song, Minyong Kang, Hwang Gyun Jeon, Byong Chang Jeong, Seong Il Seo, Seong Soo Jeon, Hyun Moo Lee and Hyun Hwan Sung
Cancers 2022, 14(10), 2497; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14102497 - 19 May 2022
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 3072
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the perioperative outcomes and oncological results of open, laparoscopic, and robotic radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and to analyze trends in the utilization of RNU. Methods: From 2017 to 2020, the records of 61, [...] Read more.
Purpose: To compare the perioperative outcomes and oncological results of open, laparoscopic, and robotic radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and to analyze trends in the utilization of RNU. Methods: From 2017 to 2020, the records of 61, 185, and 119 patients who underwent open, laparoscopic, and robotic RNU, respectively, were reviewed. Results: Baseline characteristics were not significantly different among the three groups. Robotic RNU has recently started to increase from 9% in 2017 to 67% in 2021. Operation time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, and 90-day complications were not different between the three groups. The three-year overall survival (OS) rates for open, laparoscopic, and robotic RNU were 91.8%, 90.4%, and 92.1%, respectively (p > 0.05). No differences in the progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and OS were observed according to the surgical approach in the Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. Multivariate analysis showed that surgical approach was not an independent predictor of PFS, CSS, and OS. Conclusion: The use of robotic RNU in patients with UTUC has been starting to increase and replace open and laparoscopic RNU. Perioperative outcomes, 90-day complications, and oncological outcomes of robotic RNU were not inferior to those of open and laparoscopic RNU. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 3237 KB  
Article
Role of the Laparoscopic Approach for Complex Urologic Surgery in the Era of Robotics
by Iulia Andras, Angelo Territo, Teodora Telecan, Paul Medan, Ion Perciuleac, Alexandru Berindean, Dan V. Stanca, Maximilian Buzoianu, Ioan Coman and Nicolae Crisan
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(9), 1812; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10091812 - 21 Apr 2021
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 3032
Abstract
(1) Introduction: The advent of robotic surgery led to the assumption that laparoscopic surgery would be replaced entirely. However, the high costs of robotic surgery limit its availability. The aim of the current study was to assess the feasibility of the 3D laparoscopic [...] Read more.
(1) Introduction: The advent of robotic surgery led to the assumption that laparoscopic surgery would be replaced entirely. However, the high costs of robotic surgery limit its availability. The aim of the current study was to assess the feasibility of the 3D laparoscopic approach for the most complex urological procedures. (2) Materials and methods: We included in the current study all patients who had undergone complex 3D laparoscopic procedures in our department since January 2017, including radical nephrectomy (LRN) using a dual combined approach (19 patients), radical nephroureterectomy (LRNU) with bladder cuff excision (13 patients), and radical cystectomy (LRC) with intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) (21 patients). (3) Results: The mean operative time was 345/230/478 min, the complications rate was 26%/30.76%/23.8% and positive surgical margins were encountered in 3/1/1 patients for the combined approach of LRN/LRNU/LRC with ICUD, respectively. A single patient was converted to open surgery during LRN due to extension of the vena cava thrombus above the hepatic veins. After LRC, sepsis was the most common complication and 8 patients were readmitted at a mean of 15.5 days after discharge. (4) Conclusions: In the era of robotic surgery, laparoscopy remains a plausible alternative for most complex oncological cases. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Nephrology & Urology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop