Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (127)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = regional nerve block

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
21 pages, 838 KiB  
Systematic Review
Systematic Review of Hip Fractures and Regional Anesthesia: Efficacy of the Main Blocks and Comparison for a Multidisciplinary and Effective Approach for Patients in the Hospital Setting of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation
by Enrique González Marcos, Inés Almagro Vidal, Rodrigo Arranz Pérez, Julio Morillas Martinez, Amalia Díaz Viudes, Ana Rodríguez Martín, Alberto José Gago Sánchez, Carmen García De Leániz and Daniela Rodriguez Marín
Surg. Tech. Dev. 2025, 14(3), 27; https://doi.org/10.3390/std14030027 - 6 Aug 2025
Abstract
Background: Hip fractures represent a major clinical challenge, particularly in elderly and frail patients, where postoperative pain control must balance effective analgesia with motor preservation to facilitate early mobilization. Various regional anesthesia techniques are used in this setting, including the pericapsular nerve group [...] Read more.
Background: Hip fractures represent a major clinical challenge, particularly in elderly and frail patients, where postoperative pain control must balance effective analgesia with motor preservation to facilitate early mobilization. Various regional anesthesia techniques are used in this setting, including the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block, fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB), femoral nerve block (FNB), and quadratus lumborum block (QLB), yet optimal strategies remain debated. Objectives: To systematically review the efficacy, safety, and clinical applicability of major regional anesthesia techniques for pain management in hip fractures, including considerations of fracture type, surgical approach, and functional outcomes. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the virtual library of the Hospital Central de la Defensa “Gómez Ulla” up to March 2025. Inclusion criteria were RCTs, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses evaluating regional anesthesia for hip surgery in adults. Risk of bias in RCTs was assessed using RoB 2.0, and certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach. Results: Twenty-nine studies were included, comprising RCTs, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. PENG block demonstrated superior motor preservation and reduced opioid consumption compared to FICB and FNB, particularly in intracapsular fractures and anterior surgical approaches. FICB and combination strategies (PENG+LFCN or sciatic block) may provide broader analgesic coverage in extracapsular fractures or posterior approaches. The overall risk of bias across RCTs was predominantly low, and certainty of evidence ranged from moderate to high for key outcomes. No significant safety concerns were identified across techniques, although reporting of adverse events was inconsistent. Conclusions: PENG block appears to offer a favorable balance of analgesia and motor preservation in hip fracture surgery, particularly for intracapsular fractures. For extracapsular fractures or posterior approaches, combination strategies may enhance analgesic coverage. Selection of block technique should be tailored to fracture type, surgical approach, and patient-specific functional goals. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 220 KiB  
Review
Superficial Cervical Plexus Block for Postoperative Pain Management in Occipital Craniotomies: A Narrative Review
by Shahab Ahmadzadeh, Bennett M. Ford, Alex V. Hollander, Mary Kathleen Luetkemeier, Tomasina Q. Parker-Actlis and Sahar Shekoohi
Med. Sci. 2025, 13(3), 101; https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci13030101 - 28 Jul 2025
Viewed by 388
Abstract
Post-craniotomy pain is common yet often sub-optimally managed because systemic opioids can obscure postoperative neurologic examinations. The superficial cervical plexus block (SCPB) has, therefore, emerged as a targeted regional anesthesia option for occipital craniotomies. The SCPB targets the C2–C4 nerves to anesthetize the [...] Read more.
Post-craniotomy pain is common yet often sub-optimally managed because systemic opioids can obscure postoperative neurologic examinations. The superficial cervical plexus block (SCPB) has, therefore, emerged as a targeted regional anesthesia option for occipital craniotomies. The SCPB targets the C2–C4 nerves to anesthetize the occipital scalp region, covering the lesser occipital nerve territory that lies within typical posterior scalp incisions. Clinical evidence shows the block is effective in reducing acute postoperative pain after occipital craniotomy and diminishes opioid requirements. Studies have demonstrated successful and long-lasting analgesia, reductions in 24-h opioid consumption, and a lower incidence of severe pain. Moreover, the technique exhibits a low complication rate and is safer than a deep cervical plexus block because the injection remains superficial and avoids critical vascular and neural structures. When delivered under ultrasound guidance, major adverse events are exceedingly rare. By reducing opioid use, the SCPB can help reduce postoperative complications, allowing earlier neurological assessments and fewer opioid-related side effects. Incorporation of the SCPB into multimodal analgesia regimens can, therefore, accelerate postoperative recovery by providing regionally focused, opioid-sparing pain control without clinically significant sedation. Overall, current data support the SCPB as a dependable, well-tolerated, and clinically practical approach for managing post-craniotomy pain in patients undergoing occipital approaches. In this narrative review, we will discuss the mechanism of action and anatomy, the clinical application, safety and tolerability, patient outcomes, and emerging future directions of the superficial cervical plexus block and how it mitigates post-occipital craniotomy pain. Full article
24 pages, 921 KiB  
Review
Neuromodulation of the Cardiac Autonomic Nervous System for Arrhythmia Treatment
by Benjamin Wong, Yuki Kuwabara and Siamak Salavatian
Biomedicines 2025, 13(7), 1776; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13071776 - 21 Jul 2025
Viewed by 647
Abstract
This review explores current and emerging neuromodulation techniques targeting the cardiac autonomic nervous system for the treatment and prevention of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. Arrhythmias remain a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, with the autonomic nervous system playing a crucial role in [...] Read more.
This review explores current and emerging neuromodulation techniques targeting the cardiac autonomic nervous system for the treatment and prevention of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. Arrhythmias remain a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, with the autonomic nervous system playing a crucial role in arrhythmogenesis. Interventions span surgical, pharmacological, and bioelectronic methods. We discuss the range of neuromodulation methods targeting the stellate ganglion, the spinal region, the parasympathetic system, and other promising methods. These include stellate ganglion block, stellate ganglion ablation, cardiac sympathetic denervation, subcutaneous electrical stimulation, thoracic epidural anesthesia, spinal cord stimulation, dorsal root ganglion stimulation, vagus nerve stimulation, baroreflex activation therapy, carotid body ablation, renal denervation, ganglionated plexi ablation, acupuncture, and transcutaneous magnetic stimulation. Both preclinical and clinical studies are presented as evidence for arrhythmia management. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1045 KiB  
Article
Metabolomic Profiling of Erector Spinae Plane Block for Breast Cancer Surgery
by Ekin Guran, Ozan Kaplan, Serpil Savlı, Cigdem Sonmez, Lutfi Dogan and Suheyla Unver
Medicina 2025, 61(7), 1294; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61071294 - 18 Jul 2025
Viewed by 291
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Regional and systemic analgesic techniques, such as erector spinae plane (ESP) block and opioid administration, implemented during cancer surgery, have been shown to influence immune responses and potentially affect cancer outcomes. Surgical stress and analgesic techniques used in cancer surgery—such [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Regional and systemic analgesic techniques, such as erector spinae plane (ESP) block and opioid administration, implemented during cancer surgery, have been shown to influence immune responses and potentially affect cancer outcomes. Surgical stress and analgesic techniques used in cancer surgery—such as regional nerve blocks or systemic opioids—not only affect pain control but also influence immune and inflammatory pathways that may impact cancer progression. To understand the biological consequences of these interventions, metabolomic profiling has emerged as a powerful approach for capturing systemic metabolic and immunological changes, which are particularly relevant in the oncologic perioperative setting. In this study, we examined the impact of the ESP on the metabolomic profile, as well as levels of VEGF, cortisol, and CRP, in addition to its analgesic effects in breast cancer surgery. Materials and Methods: Ninety patients were placed into three different analgesia groups (morphine, ESP, and control groups). Demographic data, ASA classification, comorbidities, surgery types, and pain scores were documented. Blood samples were taken at preoperative hour 0, postoperative hour 1, and postoperative hour 24 (T0, T1, and T24). VEGF, cortisol, and CRP levels were measured, and metabolomic analysis was performed. Results: Study groups were comparable regarding demographic findings, comorbidities, and surgery types (p > 0.05). NRS scores of group ESP were lowest in the first 12 h period (p < 0.01) and ESP block reduced opioid consumption (p < 0.01). VEGF and cortisol levels of group morphine were similar to ESP at T24 (p > 0.05). Group ESP had lower VEGF and cortisol levels than the control at T24 (p = 0.025, p = 0.041, respectively.). The CRP level of group morphine was higher than both ESP and control at T24 (p = 0.022). Metabolites involved in primary bile acid, steroid hormone biosynthesis, amino acid, and glutathione metabolism were changed in group ESP. Conclusions: Metabolites in bile acid biosynthesis and steroid hormone pathways, which play a key role in immune responses, were notably lower in the ESP group. Accordingly, VEGF and cortisol peaks were more moderate in group ESP. In conclusion, we think that ESP block, which provides adequate analgesia, is an acceptable approach in terms of modulating immune responses in breast cancer surgery. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Insights and Advances in Cancer Biomarkers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1498 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of Ropivacaine and 3-OH-Ropivacaine Pharmacokinetics Following Interpectoral Nerve Block via LC-MS/MS—A Pilot Study
by Mihaela Butiulca, Lenard Farczadi, Silvia Imre, Camil Eugen Vari, Laurian Vlase, Leonard Azamfirei and Alexandra Elena Lazar
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(14), 6696; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26146696 - 12 Jul 2025
Viewed by 315
Abstract
Regional anesthesia techniques such as the ultrasound-guided PECS II (pectoral nerve block) block are increasingly employed to optimize perioperative analgesia while minimizing systemic anesthetic exposure. Ropivacaine is commonly used for its favorable pharmacological profile; however, clinical data on its pharmacokinetics and systemic metabolite [...] Read more.
Regional anesthesia techniques such as the ultrasound-guided PECS II (pectoral nerve block) block are increasingly employed to optimize perioperative analgesia while minimizing systemic anesthetic exposure. Ropivacaine is commonly used for its favorable pharmacological profile; however, clinical data on its pharmacokinetics and systemic metabolite behavior following interpectoral administration remain limited. This study aimed to characterize the plasma concentration–time profile of ropivacaine and its main active metabolite, 3-OH-ropivacaine, in patients undergoing interpectoral nerve block, using a validated LC-MS/MS (liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry) method. Venous blood samples were collected from 18 patients at predefined time points (0, 1, 3, 6, and 24 h) following a PECS II block performed with a ropivacaine-lidocaine mixture. Plasma concentrations were quantified via a validated LC-MS/MS protocol in accordance with FDA (Food and Drug Administration) and EMA (European Medicines Agency) guidelines. Pharmacokinetic parameters were derived using non-compartmental analysis. Ropivacaine reached a mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax—maximum concentration) of 167.5 ± 28.3 ng/mL at 1.3 ± 0.2 h (Tmax—maximum time). The metabolite 3-OH-ropivacaine peaked at 124.1 ± 21.4 ng/mL at 2.3 ± 0.3 h. The terminal elimination half-life was 19.4 ± 2.8 h for ropivacaine and 29.2 ± 3.1 h for its metabolite. Plasma levels demonstrated prolonged systemic exposure with predictable pharmacokinetics. The PECS II block using ropivacaine results in sustained systemic levels of both the parent drug and its primary metabolite, supporting its role in prolonged perioperative analgesia. These data provide a pharmacokinetic foundation for personalized regional anesthesia protocols. This strategy facilitates the adaptation of anesthetic protocols to the individual characteristics of each patient, aligning with the principles of personalized medicine, particularly in patients with altered metabolic capacity. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ion Channels as a Potential Target in Pharmaceutical Designs 2.0)
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 1786 KiB  
Review
Saxitoxin: A Comprehensive Review of Its History, Structure, Toxicology, Biosynthesis, Detection, and Preventive Implications
by Huiyun Deng, Xinrui Shang, Hu Zhu, Ning Huang, Lianghua Wang and Mingjuan Sun
Mar. Drugs 2025, 23(7), 277; https://doi.org/10.3390/md23070277 - 2 Jul 2025
Viewed by 1331
Abstract
Saxitoxin (STX) is a potent toxin produced by marine dinoflagellates and freshwater or brackish water cyanobacteria, and is a member of the paralytic shellfish toxins (PSTs). As a highly specific blocker of voltage-gated sodium channels (NaVs), STX blocks sodium ion influx, thereby inhibiting [...] Read more.
Saxitoxin (STX) is a potent toxin produced by marine dinoflagellates and freshwater or brackish water cyanobacteria, and is a member of the paralytic shellfish toxins (PSTs). As a highly specific blocker of voltage-gated sodium channels (NaVs), STX blocks sodium ion influx, thereby inhibiting nerve impulse transmission and leading to systemic physiological dysfunctions in the nervous, respiratory, cardiovascular, and digestive systems. Severe exposure can lead to paralysis, respiratory failure, and mortality. STX primarily enters the human body through the consumption of contaminated shellfish, posing a significant public health risk as the causative agent of paralytic shellfish poisoning (PSP). Beyond its acute toxicity, STX exerts cascading impacts on food safety, marine ecosystem integrity, and economic stability, particularly in regions affected by harmful algal blooms (HABs). Moreover, the complex molecular structure of STX—tricyclic skeleton and biguanide group—and its diverse analogs (more than 50 derivatives) have made it the focus of research on natural toxins. In this review, we traced the discovery history, chemical structure, molecular biosynthesis, biological enrichment mechanisms, and toxicological actions of STX. Moreover, we highlighted recent advancements in the potential for detection and treatment strategies of STX. By integrating multidisciplinary insights, this review aims to provide a holistic understanding of STX and to guide future research directions for its prevention, management, and potential applications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Marine Biotoxins 3.0)
Show Figures

Figure 1

30 pages, 555 KiB  
Review
Comprehensive Approaches to Pain Management in Postoperative Spinal Surgery Patients: Advanced Strategies and Future Directions
by Dhruba Podder, Olivia Stala, Rahim Hirani, Adam M. Karp and Mill Etienne
Neurol. Int. 2025, 17(6), 94; https://doi.org/10.3390/neurolint17060094 - 18 Jun 2025
Viewed by 1315
Abstract
Effective postoperative pain management remains a major clinical challenge in spinal surgery, with poorly controlled pain affecting up to 50% of patients and contributing to delayed mobilization, prolonged hospitalization, and risk of chronic postsurgical pain. This review synthesizes current and emerging strategies in [...] Read more.
Effective postoperative pain management remains a major clinical challenge in spinal surgery, with poorly controlled pain affecting up to 50% of patients and contributing to delayed mobilization, prolonged hospitalization, and risk of chronic postsurgical pain. This review synthesizes current and emerging strategies in postoperative spinal pain management, tracing the evolution from opioid-centric paradigms to individualized, multimodal approaches. Multimodal analgesia (MMA) has become the cornerstone of contemporary care, combining pharmacologic agents, such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, and gabapentinoids, with regional anesthesia techniques, including erector spinae plane blocks and liposomal bupivacaine. Adjunctive nonpharmacologic modalities like early mobilization, cognitive behavioral therapy, and mindfulness-based interventions further optimize recovery and address the biopsychosocial dimensions of pain. For patients with refractory pain, neuromodulation techniques such as spinal cord and peripheral nerve stimulation offer promising results. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI), biomarker discovery, and nanotechnology are poised to enhance personalized pain protocols through predictive modeling and targeted drug delivery. Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols, which integrate many of these strategies, have been shown to reduce opioid use, hospital length of stay, and complication rates. Nevertheless, variability in implementation and the need for individualized protocols remain key challenges. Future directions include AI-guided analytics, regenerative therapies, and expanded research on long-term functional outcomes. This review provides an evidence-based framework for pain control following spinal surgery, emphasizing integration of multimodal and innovative approaches tailored to diverse patient populations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pain Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 728 KiB  
Article
General Anesthesia Without Nerve Block Is Non-Inferior to General Anesthesia with Nerve Block for Postoperative Pain Control in Antegrade Femoral Limb Lengthening: A Retrospective Study
by Akram Al Ramlawi, Zhongming Chen, Michael Assayag, John E. Herzenberg and Philip K. McClure
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(12), 4066; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14124066 - 9 Jun 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 447
Abstract
Background: Effective postoperative pain management is essential in femoral limb lengthening surgery. Although regional nerve blocks reduce pain and opioid use, their benefit in antegrade femoral intramedullary limb lengthening is unclear. This study compares postoperative pain and opioid consumption in patients receiving [...] Read more.
Background: Effective postoperative pain management is essential in femoral limb lengthening surgery. Although regional nerve blocks reduce pain and opioid use, their benefit in antegrade femoral intramedullary limb lengthening is unclear. This study compares postoperative pain and opioid consumption in patients receiving general anesthesia (GA) alone versus GA with a preoperative femoral or fascia iliaca nerve block. Methods: A retrospective review included 192 patients who underwent femoral lengthening with intramedullary telescoping nails between January 2012 and October 2023 at a single center. Patients were categorized into Group A (GA alone, n = 131) and Group B (GA plus nerve block, n = 61). Primary outcomes were postoperative mean and maximum pain scores in the first 24 h, total opioid pills prescribed at discharge, and total morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) used in the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU). Non-inferiority was defined by a margin of one standard deviation for pain scores and opioid usage. Results: Demographics were similar between groups. Maximum PACU pain scores were 3.8 for Group A and 3.3 for Group B (p > 0.05); mean pain scores were 2.1 and 1.9, respectively (p > 0.05). GA alone was non-inferior for pain control. However, total opioid pills prescribed at discharge were higher in Group A (23.2) than Group B (10) (p < 0.05). PACU MME usage was also higher in Group A (26 vs. 18.4 ± 15 mg, p < 0.05), though non-inferiority criteria were met. Conclusions: GA alone is non-inferior to GA with nerve block for postoperative pain management following antegrade femoral intramedullary limb lengthening. Although patients without a nerve block received more opioids at discharge, their pain control remained similarly effective. Given potential risks and the lack of clear pain reduction benefits, routine nerve block use may not be warranted. Decisions regarding nerve block application should be individualized, considering patient preferences, surgeon recommendations, and anesthesiologist input. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Orthopedics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 3635 KiB  
Article
Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia in Permanent Pacemaker Implantation: An Observational Study
by Hakan Akelma, Enes Çelik, Yusuf İpek, Mehmet Ali Turgut, Muhammed Raşit Tanırcan, Adem Aktan and Mehmet Zülküf Karahan
Medicina 2025, 61(6), 1001; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61061001 - 28 May 2025
Viewed by 562
Abstract
Background and Objectives: When pacemakers were first introduced, their indications and implantation techniques were quite limited. Over 400,000 permanent pacemakers are implanted annually worldwide, mostly under local anesthesia (LA), which is preferred for its hemodynamic stability. However, inadequate LA often leads to excessive [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: When pacemakers were first introduced, their indications and implantation techniques were quite limited. Over 400,000 permanent pacemakers are implanted annually worldwide, mostly under local anesthesia (LA), which is preferred for its hemodynamic stability. However, inadequate LA often leads to excessive use of local anesthetics or analgesics. This study evaluates the efficacy of combining interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) and superficial cervical plexus block (SCPB) as regional anesthesia (RA) techniques during permanent pacemaker implantation compared to LA. Materials and Methods: A total of 42 patients were divided into RA and LA groups. The RA group underwent ISB and SCPB under ultrasound guidance, while the LA group received traditional local anesthetic methods. Results: The RA group exhibited superior pain control, reduced analgesic requirements, and higher satisfaction rates compared to the LA group. Ultrasound guidance enhanced block success rates and minimized complications. Conclusions: ISB and SCPB offer a superior alternative to LA for pacemaker implantation, especially in patients with anxiety or insufficient LA response. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cardiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 328 KiB  
Review
From Pain Control to Early Mobility: The Evolution of Regional Anesthesia in Geriatric Total Hip Arthroplasty
by Tomasz Reysner, Grzegorz Kowalski, Aleksander Mularski, Malgorzata Reysner and Katarzyna Wieczorowska-Tobis
Reports 2025, 8(2), 64; https://doi.org/10.3390/reports8020064 - 9 May 2025
Viewed by 1044
Abstract
The evolution of regional anesthesia in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has significantly impacted perioperative management, particularly in older adults, where age-related physiological vulnerability requires optimized strategies. Adequate pain control is crucial in enhancing recovery, minimizing opioid consumption, and reducing complications. Traditional nerve blocks [...] Read more.
The evolution of regional anesthesia in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has significantly impacted perioperative management, particularly in older adults, where age-related physiological vulnerability requires optimized strategies. Adequate pain control is crucial in enhancing recovery, minimizing opioid consumption, and reducing complications. Traditional nerve blocks such as lumbar plexus and femoral nerve blocks have long been the mainstay of analgesia. However, they are associated with significant motor impairments, which delay mobilization and increase the fall risks. Introducing motor-sparing regional anesthesia techniques represents a substantial advancement in optimizing postoperative pain management while preserving muscle function. Motor-sparing techniques, including the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block, supra-inguinal fascia iliaca block (SI-FIB), erector spinae plane block (ESPB), and quadratus lumborum block (QLB), have been developed to provide adequate analgesia without compromising motor control. The PENG block selectively targets the articular branches of the femoral, obturator, and accessory obturator nerves, ensuring superior pain relief while minimizing quadriceps weakness. Similarly, the SI-FIB provides extensive sensory blockade with minimal motor involvement, allowing for earlier ambulation. The ESPB and QLB extend analgesia beyond the hip region while preserving motor function, reducing opioid consumption, and facilitating early rehabilitation. Compared to traditional motor-impairing blocks, these newer techniques align with Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols by promoting early mobility and reducing the hospital length of stay. Studies suggest that motor-sparing blocks lead to improved functional recovery, lower postoperative pain scores, and decreased opioid requirements, which are critical factors in geriatric THA patients. Moreover, these techniques present a safer alternative, reducing the risk of postoperative falls—a significant concern in elderly patients undergoing hip replacement. Despite their advantages, motor-sparing nerve blocks are still evolving, and further research is necessary to standardize the protocols, optimize the dosing strategies, and evaluate the long-term functional benefits. Integrating these techniques into routine perioperative care may significantly enhance patient outcomes and revolutionize pain management in geriatric THA. As regional anesthesia advances, motor-sparing techniques will improve postoperative recovery, ensuring patient safety and functional independence. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Anaesthesia)
18 pages, 1105 KiB  
Systematic Review
Management of Postoperative Pain Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Level I Evidence-Based Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis
by Filippo Migliorini, Marcel Betsch, Tommaso Bardazzi, Giorgia Colarossi, Hani Ayad Mohamed Elezabi, Arne Driessen, Frank Hildebrand and Mario Pasurka
Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18(4), 556; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18040556 - 9 Apr 2025
Viewed by 1261
Abstract
Background: Postoperative pain management after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is crucial for promoting early recovery. Advances in pain management techniques have significantly improved outcomes after TKA. Recently, multimodal analgesia has emerged as a key concept in pain management following TKA, using regional anaesthesia [...] Read more.
Background: Postoperative pain management after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is crucial for promoting early recovery. Advances in pain management techniques have significantly improved outcomes after TKA. Recently, multimodal analgesia has emerged as a key concept in pain management following TKA, using regional anaesthesia to reduce narcotic use and minimise narcotic-related side effects. This Bayesian network meta-analysis compared different treatment options for the management of postoperative pain following primary TKA. Methods: This study was conducted following the 2020 PRISMA statement. In January 2025, all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) related to postoperative pain management following TKA were accessed. Pain reported on postoperative days (PODs) 1–3 was evaluated. Results: Data from 7199 patients were retrieved. Of these, 63.2% (4232 of 6691) were women, and the mean age was 66.7 ± 3.1 years. The mean length of follow-up was 10.2 ± 18.3 weeks. At baseline, comparability was confirmed for age (p = 0.1), BMI (p = 0.8), and visual analogue scale (VAS, p = 0.1). On POD 1, single-shot SNB/three-in-one block was associated with a lower VAS, followed by continuous intra-articular analgesia/local infiltration analgesia (LIA)/posterior capsule infiltration (PCI) and continuous femoral nerve block (FNB)/intermittent SNB. On POD 2, continuous intra-articular analgesia/LIA/PCI was associated with a lower VAS, followed by continuous FNB/PCI and single-shot femoral triangle block (FTB)/single-shot infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee (IPACK). On POD 3, continuous ACB was associated with a lower VAS, followed by continuous intra-articular analgesia/LIA/PCI and continuous FNB/PCI. Conclusions: Continuous intra-articular analgesia/LIA/PCI was associated with the best pain control following primary TKA. Multimodal analgesia, which incorporates peripheral nerve blockade and periarticular injections, has become a key concept in contemporary pain management following TKA. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pharmacology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 499 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of the Adjuvant Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Ropivacaine for Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Prospective Double-Blind Randomized Trial
by Kassiani Theodoraki, Ioannis Koutalas and Christina Orfanou
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(7), 2478; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14072478 - 4 Apr 2025
Viewed by 1107
Abstract
Background and goal of study: The aim of this double-blind randomized study was to investigate the efficacy of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to the local anesthetic in transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block for unilateral inguinal hernioplasty. Materials and Methods: Eighty eligible patients were [...] Read more.
Background and goal of study: The aim of this double-blind randomized study was to investigate the efficacy of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to the local anesthetic in transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block for unilateral inguinal hernioplasty. Materials and Methods: Eighty eligible patients were randomly allocated into ultrasound-guided TAP block with either dexmedetomidine 0.5 mcg/kg diluted to a volume of 2 mL and ropivacaine 0.5% 25 mL (DR group) or ropivacaine 0.5% 25 mL and normal saline 2 mL (R group). The primary endpoint of this study was the numeric rating scale (NRS) score during coughing 24 h postoperatively. Secondary parameters were also evaluated. Results: Patients in the RD group demonstrated significantly less pain at rest three, six and 12 h postoperatively as compared to patients in the R group (p = 0.002, 0.032 and 0.049, respectively). Significant differences between the two groups were also demonstrated for NRS scores during coughing at 3, 6 and 12 h postoperatively (p = 0.013, 0.035 and 0.042, respectively). Additionally, the RD group demonstrated lower intraoperative remifentanil consumption (p < 0.001), lower PACU morphine requirement (p = 0.012) and lower overall PCA morphine requirement postoperatively (p < 0.001). Sedation scores, the incidence of hypotension, bradycardia and the occurrence of postoperative nausea and vomiting were no different between the two groups. Finally, the incidence of chronic pain at 6 months was significantly lower in the RD group compared to the R group (5.55% vs. 25%, p = 0.049). Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine reduces postoperative pain scores, has opioid-sparing effects and is associated with a favorable effect on chronic pain without side effects in patients subjected to TAP block for inguinal hernia repair. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Anesthesiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 3121 KiB  
Article
Analysis and Tracking of Intra-Needle Ultrasound Pleural Signals for Improved Anesthetic Procedures in the Thoracic Region
by Fu-Wei Su, Chia-Wei Yang, Ching-Fang Yang, Yi-En Tsai, Wei-Nung Teng and Huihua Kenny Chiang
Biosensors 2025, 15(4), 201; https://doi.org/10.3390/bios15040201 - 21 Mar 2025
Viewed by 529
Abstract
Background: Ultrasonography is commonly employed during thoracic regional anesthesia; however, its accuracy can be affected by factors such as obesity and poor penetration through the rib window. Needle-sized ultrasound transducers, known as intra-needle ultrasound (INUS) transducers, have been developed to detect the pleura [...] Read more.
Background: Ultrasonography is commonly employed during thoracic regional anesthesia; however, its accuracy can be affected by factors such as obesity and poor penetration through the rib window. Needle-sized ultrasound transducers, known as intra-needle ultrasound (INUS) transducers, have been developed to detect the pleura and fascia using a one-dimensional radio frequency mode ultrasound signal. In this study, we aimed to use time-frequency analysis to characterize the pleural signal and develop an automated tool to identify the pleura during medical procedures. Methods: We developed an INUS system and investigated the pleural signal it measured by establishing a phantom study, and an in vivo animal study. Signals from the pleura, endothoracic fascia, and intercostal muscles were analyzed. Additionally, we conducted time- and frequency-domain analyses of the pleural and alveolar signals. Results: We identified the unique characteristics of the pleura, including a flickering phenomenon, speckle-like patterns, and highly variable multi-band spectra in the ultrasound signal during the breathing cycle. These characteristics are likely due to the multiple reflections from the sliding visceral pleura and alveoli. This automated identification of the pleura can enhance the safety for thoracic regional anesthesia, particularly in difficult cases. Conclusions: The unique flickering pleural signal based on INUS can be processed by time-frequency domain analysis and further tracked by an auto-identification algorithm. This technique has potential applications in thoracic regional anesthesia and other interventions. However, further studies are required to validate this hypothesis. Key Points Summary: Question: How can the ultrasound pleural signal be distinguished from other tissues during breathing? Findings: The frequency domain analysis of the pleural ultrasound signal showed fast variant and multi-band characteristics. We suggest this is due to ultrasound distortion caused by the interface of multiple moving alveoli. The multiple ultrasonic reflections from the sliding pleura and alveoli returned in variable and multi-banded frequency. Meaning: The distinguished pleural signal can be used for the auto-identification of the pleura for further clinical respiration monitoring and safety during regional anesthesia. Glossary of Terms: intra-needle ultrasound (INUS); radio frequency (RF); short-time Fourier transform (STFT); intercostal nerve block (ICNB); paravertebral block (PVB); pulse repetition frequency (PRF). Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biosensors for Monitoring and Diagnostics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 857 KiB  
Article
A Retrospective Review of the Deep Parasternal Intercostal Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery with Median Sternotomy
by Tzonghuei Chen, Leslie Annette Vargas Galvan, Kendra L. Walsh, Andrew Winegarner, Patricia Apruzzese, Shyamal Asher and Andrew Maslow
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(6), 2074; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14062074 - 18 Mar 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 787
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Regional anesthesia is an important part of Enhanced Recovery after Cardiac Surgery (ERACS) protocols designed to enhance analgesia, reduce opioid use, and improve postoperative outcomes. The deep parasternal intercostal plane (Deep-PIP) block is a fascial plane block in which local anesthetics [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Regional anesthesia is an important part of Enhanced Recovery after Cardiac Surgery (ERACS) protocols designed to enhance analgesia, reduce opioid use, and improve postoperative outcomes. The deep parasternal intercostal plane (Deep-PIP) block is a fascial plane block in which local anesthetics are injected between the intercostal and transversus thoracis muscles to block neural transmission through the anterior cutaneous branches of the intercostal nerve. This study evaluates the impact of the Deep-PIP block in patients undergoing cardiac surgery via median sternotomy. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, patients were divided into cohorts of 232 patients who had a block (BLOCK group) and 351 patients who did not receive a block (NOBlock group) using propensity score matching. Pain scores and opioid consumption over 24 h, extubation times, and ICU and hospital length of stay were compared for the two groups. Several subgroup analyses were also performed to evaluate the effects of block technique and block adjuvants. Results: While there was not a statistically significant difference in opioid consumption between the two groups, the BLOCK group had significantly lower pain scores, extubation times, and hospital length of stay. The subgroup analyses showed that modifications to block technique and use of block adjuvants were associated with reduced opioid consumption, but did not significantly affect pain scores, extubation time, or ICU or hospital length of stay. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the benefits of the deep parasternal intercostal plane block as part of an ERACS protocol. Routine implementation of the Deep-PIP block is reasonable given its potential benefits combined with its positive safety profile. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1004 KiB  
Article
Is a Perioperative Opioid-Sparing Anesthesia-Analgesia Strategy Feasible in Open Thoracotomies? Findings from a Retrospective Matched Cohort Study
by Vasileia Nyktari, Georgios Stefanakis, Georgios Papastratigakis, Eleni Diamantaki, Emmanouela Koutoulaki, Periklis Vasilos, Giorgos Giannakakis, Metaxia Bareka and Alexandra Papaioannou
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(6), 1820; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14061820 - 8 Mar 2025
Viewed by 947
Abstract
Background/Objectives: To assess the feasibility and effectiveness of a perioperative opioid-sparing anesthesia-analgesia (OSA-A) technique without regional nerve blocks compared to standard opioid-based technique (OBA-A) in open thoracotomies. Methods: This retrospective, matched cohort study was conducted at a university hospital from September [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: To assess the feasibility and effectiveness of a perioperative opioid-sparing anesthesia-analgesia (OSA-A) technique without regional nerve blocks compared to standard opioid-based technique (OBA-A) in open thoracotomies. Methods: This retrospective, matched cohort study was conducted at a university hospital from September 2019 to February 2021, including adult patients undergoing open thoracotomy for lung or pleura pathology. Sixty patients in the OSA-A group were matched with 40 in the OBA-A group. Outcomes included postoperative pain scores on days 0, 1, and 2; 24-h postoperative morphine consumption; PACU and hospital length of stay; time to bowel movement; and rates of nausea and vomiting. Results: Of 125 eligible patients, 100 had complete records (60 OSA-A, 40 OBA-A). Demographics were similar, but ASA status scores were higher in the OBA-A group. The OSA-A group reported significantly lower pain levels at rest, during cough, and on movement on the first two postoperative days, shorter PACU stay, and required fewer opioids. They also had better gastrointestinal motility (p < 0.0001) and lower rates of nausea and vomiting on postoperative days 1 and 2. A follow-up study with 68 patients (46 OSA-A, 22 OBA-A) assessing chronic pain prevalence found no significant differences between the groups. Conclusions: OSA-A without regional nerve blocks for open thoracotomies is feasible and safe, improving postoperative pain management, reducing opioid consumption, shortening PACU stay, and enhancing early gastrointestinal recovery compared to OBA-A. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Advances in Cardiothoracic Anesthesia)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop