Next Article in Journal
Maintenance Immunosuppression in Kidney Transplantation: A Review of the Current Status and Future Directions
Next Article in Special Issue
Comparative Analysis of Perioperative Analgesia Methods in Thoracic Surgery: A Literature Systemic Review
Previous Article in Journal
Safety and Efficacy of Ritlecitinib for the Treatment of Patients with Alopecia Areata: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Trials
Previous Article in Special Issue
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols in Cardiac Surgery: Impact on Opioid Consumption
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Is a Perioperative Opioid-Sparing Anesthesia-Analgesia Strategy Feasible in Open Thoracotomies? Findings from a Retrospective Matched Cohort Study

by
Vasileia Nyktari
1,*,
Georgios Stefanakis
2,
Georgios Papastratigakis
2,
Eleni Diamantaki
2,
Emmanouela Koutoulaki
2,
Periklis Vasilos
2,
Giorgos Giannakakis
3,
Metaxia Bareka
4 and
Alexandra Papaioannou
1
1
School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, 71003 Crete, Greece
2
Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital of Heraklion, 71110 Crete, Greece
3
Computational Medicine Laboratory (CML), Institute of Computer Science (ICS), Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas (FORTH), 70013 Crete, Greece
4
School of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41500 Larissa, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(6), 1820; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14061820
Submission received: 24 January 2025 / Revised: 1 March 2025 / Accepted: 6 March 2025 / Published: 8 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Advances in Cardiothoracic Anesthesia)

Abstract

:
Background/Objectives: To assess the feasibility and effectiveness of a perioperative opioid-sparing anesthesia-analgesia (OSA-A) technique without regional nerve blocks compared to standard opioid-based technique (OBA-A) in open thoracotomies. Methods: This retrospective, matched cohort study was conducted at a university hospital from September 2019 to February 2021, including adult patients undergoing open thoracotomy for lung or pleura pathology. Sixty patients in the OSA-A group were matched with 40 in the OBA-A group. Outcomes included postoperative pain scores on days 0, 1, and 2; 24-h postoperative morphine consumption; PACU and hospital length of stay; time to bowel movement; and rates of nausea and vomiting. Results: Of 125 eligible patients, 100 had complete records (60 OSA-A, 40 OBA-A). Demographics were similar, but ASA status scores were higher in the OBA-A group. The OSA-A group reported significantly lower pain levels at rest, during cough, and on movement on the first two postoperative days, shorter PACU stay, and required fewer opioids. They also had better gastrointestinal motility (p < 0.0001) and lower rates of nausea and vomiting on postoperative days 1 and 2. A follow-up study with 68 patients (46 OSA-A, 22 OBA-A) assessing chronic pain prevalence found no significant differences between the groups. Conclusions: OSA-A without regional nerve blocks for open thoracotomies is feasible and safe, improving postoperative pain management, reducing opioid consumption, shortening PACU stay, and enhancing early gastrointestinal recovery compared to OBA-A.

1. Introduction

Post-thoracotomy pain is severe, multifactorial, and attributed to both nociceptive and neuropathic mechanisms [1,2,3]. The contributing factors include surgical incision, muscular, ligamentous, and neural manipulation, rib retraction or fracture, pleural irritation and thoracostomy tube placement. Failure to control this pain has been linked to increased postoperative pulmonary complications, as it negatively affects deep breathing, coughing, and mobilization [1,2]. Furthermore, thoracic surgical procedures frequently result in persistent pain and increased pain sensitivity, with the reported prevalence of post-thoracotomy pain syndrome (PTPS) ranging from 33% to 91% [1,4,5]. Notably, recent research has identified acute pain following thoracic surgery as a robust predictor for the development of PTPS [6].
Post-thoracotomy pain is commonly addressed by thoracic epidural analgesia, paravertebral blocks, or the administration of opioids intravenously. Thoracic epidural analgesia, the gold standard for post-thoracotomy pain has been associated with significant complications, such as hypotension and epidural hematoma, and with a paradoxical increase in length of stay in hospital [3,7]. Paravertebral blocks are considered equivalent to thoracic epidural analgesia, but they carry the risk of vascular puncture, bleeding, and hematoma formation [8]. Furthermore, while epidural and paravertebral blocks effectively block neurotransmission of intercostal and sympathetic nerves, they do not block the vagus and phrenic nerves [7]. As a result, it is often necessary to add non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or opioids. On the other hand, perioperative use of opioids has been associated with multiple side effects, as well as acute tolerance and hyperalgesia [1,9,10]. At the same time, recent publications have raised concerns regarding the impact of opioids on immunomodulation, immunosuppression, and lung cancer progression [1,11].
Current research indicates a significant gap in conclusive evidence regarding the effects of Opioid Free (OFA-A) and Opioid Sparing (OSA-A) Anesthesia-Analgesia on postoperative outcomes following thoracic surgery. A recent retrospective study on thoracic surgery patients showed a decrease in postoperative pain scores and a concomitant reduction in epidural ropivacaine consumption following the implementation of OFA-A [2].
However, to our knowledge, there is currently no study specifically addressing post-thoracotomy pain management using a perioperative opioid-sparing anesthesia-analgesia strategy (OSA-A) that does not involve a central or peripheral nerve block. The goal of the present study was to examine whether patients receiving perioperative OSA-A or an opioid-based anesthesia-analgesia strategy (OBA-A) for open thoracotomy differed in their postoperative outcomes. Besides pain scores, post-anesthesia unit (PACU) and hospital stay, nausea/vomiting, opioid consumption postoperatively, intestinal mobilization, and persistent postoperative pain were included as study outcomes. Despite conflicting data from the literature, where most evidence suggests that OSA-A/OFA-A protocols do not lower pain scores [10,12,13] our initial hypothesis is that OSA-A group would experience significantly lower pain scores, a shorter duration of stay in the Post-Anaesthesia Care Unit (PACU) and similar morphine equivalent dose (MED) consumption in the immediate postoperative period.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

This is a retrospective monocentric study conducted at the Anesthesiology Department of the University Hospital of Heraklion, Crete, Greece. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Research Ethics Review Board of the University Hospital of Heraklion (Registration number 14/18-09-2019; Registration date 18 September 2019).
For a long time in our department the standard practice for patients undergoing open thoracotomies had been the combination of general and epidural anesthesia. However, due to an increasing prevalence of anticoagulant use among patients, the option of epidural analgesia had been precluded for several individuals. Consequently, a standard OBA-A technique was performed in these cases, without a regional nerve block. Notably, in February 2016, three consultant anesthesiologists introduced OFA-A/OSA-A for open thoracotomies related to lung or pleural pathology as part of a meticulously audited quality improvement initiative.
This retrospective matched cohort study focused on individuals aged 18 years, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status 1–3, who underwent elective open thoracotomy for lung or pleural pathology between February 2015 and February 2021. As the OBA-A technique was used in patients with contraindications to regional nerve blocks (mainly patient refusal or anticoagulation), we decided to implement perioperative OSA-A without the use of any central or regional nerve block; thus, such technique implementation was excluded from the study. Exclusion criteria also included cognitive decline making effective postoperative communication difficult, and incomplete data registration on the patient’s medical record.
Based on previous studies of thoracotomy patients without locoregional techniques [14], we hypothesized that for a reduction of NRS at rest by one point in PACU, we would require 120 patients divided in two groups (60 per group) (a = 0.01, b = 0.10). All patients who underwent thoracic surgery via open thoracotomy from 2015 to 2021 were evaluated for eligibility. Patient matching criteria encompassed type of operation, surgeon, gender and age.

2.2. Anesthesia-Analgesia Management

The perioperative management protocols for OBA-A and OSA-A group are summarized in Table 1.
To compare analgesic requirements in the postoperative period, the total amount of morphine (mg) equivalents delivered in the period 0–48 h was recorded. This included PCA morphine (iv), morphine administered in PACU) and any other opioid administered in PACU, on the first (POD1) and second (POD2) postoperative days. All administrated opioids were converted to iv MED according to Table 2 (from iv Morphine equivalents for commonly used drugs—ENCORE study) [15].

2.3. Study Outcomes

2.3.1. Pain and Opioid Consumption

Patient pain scores were systematically recorded in a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) ranging from 0 to 10 in PACU (Postoperative Day 0, designated as POD0), and postoperative days 1 and 2 (POD1, POD2 respectively). Pain assessment in the post-anaesthesia care unit was performed approximately one hour after transfer from the operating theatre, allowing the patient to be fully awake and cooperative.
Cumulative opioid consumption was assessed in terms of intravenous MED over the initial 48 postoperative hours. Opioids were administered under three distinct circumstances: (1) supplemental opioids provided in PACU, (2) patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), and (3) any additional opioids given on ward on POD1 and POD2.

2.3.2. Other Outcomes

In our comparative analysis of patient cohorts, several additional factors were identified as essential: the duration of stay in PACU, the time of bowel function recovery, and the prevalence of nausea/vomiting on POD1 and POD2.
A comprehensive evaluation of persistent pain at the thoracotomy site was conducted during follow-up assessments occurring more than six months postoperatively. To identify the presence of chronic pain, patients were assessed via structured telephone interviews. We ensured that all interviews took place after a minimum of six months following the surgical intervention. All participants provided informed consent for these interviews, which were conducted by a qualified anesthetist. Pain intensity was quantitatively assessed using the Numerical Rate Scale (0–10). Patients were classified as experiencing chronic pain if they reported a score exceeding 0 in response to any of these questions:
  • How would you assess your pain now, at this moment? (0–10)
  • How severe was the worst pain during the past 4 weeks? (0–10)
  • How severe was the pain during the past 4 weeks on average? (0–10)
Chronic pain was classified as moderate, if the patients reported NRS of 4–6 in any of the above questions and as severe if they reported a score ≥ 7 to any of the above questions. Neuropathic pain characteristics were detected by using the PainDETECT questionnaire [16].

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Categorical data were analyzed using two-sided Fisher’s exact test, to check if there are significant associations between categorical parameters. Q-Q plots and Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality tests were used to determine numerical data normality. Statistical differences between groups (OBA-A, OSA-A) were evaluated using independent samples t-test for normally distributed data and Mann-Whitney U test otherwise. To assess potential differences of factors (such as morphine consumption and pain data) that were measured at multiple time points, since these data were found to be non-normally distributed, multiple Mann-Whitney U tests were used and adjustments for multiple comparisons were made using the False Discovery Rate (FDR) method (Q = 1%). Numerical data were reported as x ¯ ± SD, and the reported p-values were corrected using the FDR method as mentioned. Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 10 (edition 10.3.1 (509)) (GraphPad Software, Boston, MA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Patients’ Characteristics

We have conducted a retrospective analysis of the acute postoperative pain service records in our hospital from 1 February 2015 to 1 February 2021. Among 380 thoracic surgeries for lung and pleura pathology, we identified 125 eligible patients for the study where locoregional techniques had not been performed, 60 in the OBA-A group and 65 in the OSA-A group (Figure 1). After matching the patients, each group included 60 patients. However, due to incomplete records, only 100 of these 120 patients had comprehensive data, including demographic information, intraoperative pharmacological agents’ administration, PACU data, and most importantly details regarding the first 2 postoperative days (60 patients in the OSA-A group and 40 patients in the OBA-A group). Our attempts to recruit additional patients for the OBA-A group by expanding the study’s period backwards, were unsuccessful because no patient postoperative pain records were found. Having undergone a thoracotomy protocol shift in our department, since 2016 as mentioned, we had no OBA-A patients moving forward from that period.
As indicated in Table 3, patients did not differ in basic demographic characteristics such as age, sex, weight, height and BMI. The only identified difference pertained to the fact that patients in the OBA-A group had higher ASA status scores.

3.2. Primary Outcome

3.2.1. Pain Assessment

The patients’ pain levels were assessed on NRS at three different time points: POD0 (during stay in PACU), POD1 and POD2. Data from both groups showed a non-normal distribution and thus two-tailed multiple Mann-Whitney U tests were used.

3.2.2. Pain Score at Rest

As shown in Figure 2A, patients in the OSA-A group reported significantly lower pain levels during rest at all time points, POD0, POD1, and POD2.
  • POD0: (OSA-A) 0.95 ± 1.92, n = 60 vs. (OBA-A) 6.05 ± 2.56, n = 40, p < 0.000001.
  • POD1: (OSA-A) 1.53 ± 2.12, n = 57 vs. (OBA-A) 3.78 ± 2.66, n = 40, p = 0.000020.
  • POD2: (OSA-A) 1.28 ± 2.34, n = 54 vs. (OBA-A) 2.47 ± 2.57, n = 34, p = 0.004402.

3.2.3. Pain Score During Cough

Notably, patients in the OSA-A group reported significantly lower levels of pain during cough on POD0, POD1 and POD2.
  • POD0: (OSA-A) 2.62 ± 2.67, n = 60 vs. (OBA-A) 8.18 ± 2.14, n = 39, p < 0.000001.
  • POD1: (OSA-A) 3.84 ± 2.83, n = 57 vs. (OBA-A) 6.03 ± 2.78, n = 40, p = 0.000210.
  • POD2: (OSA-A) 3.15 ± 2.99, n = 54 vs. (OBA-A) 5.51 ± 2.65, n = 35, p = 0.000210.

3.2.4. Pain Score During Motion

Patients in the OSA-A group reported significantly lower levels of pain during motion, on POD0, POD1 and POD2.
  • POD0: (OSA-A) 2.58 ± 2.49, n = 60 vs. (OBA-A) 8.29 ± 2.65, n = 38, p < 0.000001.
  • POD1: (OSA-A) 3.54 ± 2.61, n = 57 vs. (OBA-A) 5.98 ± 2.92, n = 40, p = 0.000055.
  • POD2: (OSA-A) 2.69 ± 2.70, n = 54 vs. (OBA-A) 4.54 ± 2.76, n = 35, p = 0.001533.

3.3. Secondary Outcomes

3.3.1. PACU and Hospital Length of Stay

Patients in the OSA-A group had a significantly shorter PACU stay, measured in hours (OSA-A group 2.030 ± 1.022 vs. OBA-A group 3.125 ± 1.036 (p < 0.0001) (see Table 4). No difference in hospital length of stay, measured in days, was observed between the two groups (OSA-A group 5.77 ± 3.45 vs. OBA-A group 5.73 ± 2.05, p: 0.2669).

3.3.2. Rescue Analgesia and Morphine Consumption in PACU and on POD1 and POD2

Patients in the OBA-A group requested analgesic interventions in PACU frequently, including both opioids and non-opioids. Specifically, a total of 27 patients in the OBA-A group required analgesic administration, whereas 21 patients in the OSA-A group required such intervention, resulting in a statistically significant difference (p = 0.0021).
During their stay in PACU (POD 0), OSA-A patients were administered tramadol for rescue analgesia, in an average dosage of 1.177 ± 2.929 mg of MED. In comparison, the OBA-A group received an average of 5.031 ± 5.705 mg of MED (p = 0.000005). This significant reduction in opioid consumption was not sustained in the subsequent postoperative days. On POD1 the OSA-A group demonstrated an average consumption of 22.86 ± 12.76 mg of MED while the OBA-A group reported an average of 21.88 ± 14.29 mg (p = 0.362445 two-tailed). On POD 2, the OSA-A group required an average of 16.54 ± 14.72 mg of MED, in contrast to the OBA-A group’s average of 16.23 ± 16.66 mg (p = 0.631847) (see Figure 3, Table 4).

3.3.3. Gastrointestinal Motility

Our findings indicate that patients within the OSA-A group exhibited a substantially higher incidence of intestinal motility on POD1 and POD2. Intestinal mobility (defined as occurrence of flatus, successful bowel movements or presence of bowel sounds) returned in more patients in OSA-A group in POD1 (51 vs. 8, p < 0.0001) and POD2 (58 vs. 22, p < 0.0001) in comparison to OBA-A patients (see Table 4).

3.3.4. Nausea-Vomiting

Patients in the OSA-A group reported significantly lower rates of postoperative nausea and vomiting in the first two postoperative days (see Table 4).

3.3.5. Chronic Pain

We successfully communicated with 68 patients to assess chronic pain following thoracotomy. Among them, 46 participants were in the OSA-A group, while 22 were in the OBA-A group. Participants in the OSA-A group were evaluated significantly earlier than those in the OBA-A group, with a mean assessment timespan of 2.52 ± 0.69 years for the OSA-A group compared to 4.41 ± 0.85 years for the OBA-A group (p < 0.0001).
27 patients reported chronic pain in varying intensity, 18 in the OSA-A group and 9 in OBA-A group. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding prevalence or severity of chronic pain. Neuropathic pain was not confirmed in any patient. Only 5 were categorized as “uncertain” based on the pain detection questionnaire: 3 in the OSA-A group and 2 in the OBA-A group. Again, no significant differences were observed between the 2 groups.

4. Discussion

This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an opioid-sparing analgesic strategy in comparison to a standardized opioid-based approach for patients undergoing conventional open thoracotomy due to lung or pleural pathology, when regional blocks were not performed. Our findings revealed that patients in the OSA-A group reported significantly lower pain levels during rest, coughing, and movement on the day following surgery and throughout the first two postoperative days, shorter PACU stay, less nausea and vomiting and earlier recovery of gastrointestinal motility.
Acute postoperative pain presents a complex and multifaceted challenge, characterized by significant variability among patients [17]. The perception of pain arises from the interplay of various factors, including noxious stimuli, peripheral nerve transmission, and central processing of pain signals. Furthermore, the effectiveness of both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions is significantly influenced by individuals’ cognitive interpretations of their pain experiences.
In this context, the optimal pain management protocol following thoracic surgery has yet to be established. It is critical to consider both the specific type of surgery performed—such as Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) or open thoracotomy—and the individual characteristics of each patient, including pulmonary function, chronic pain history, and any additional comorbidities. Thoracic surgery can impair pulmonary function, and this impairment may be exacerbated by pain [1,2,18]. For these reasons, it is imperative to implement an analgesic protocol that incorporates multimodal and regional analgesia, tailored to meet each patient’s unique needs and preferences.
Multimodal analgesia is recognized as the standard of care for pain management in thoracic surgery and integrates regional anesthetic techniques, including epidural anesthesia and fascial plane blocks, with oral regimens that either utilize opioids or prioritize opioid-sparing options [1,19]. The PROSPECT thoracotomy subgroup advocates for the perioperative application of regional analgesia, specifically paravertebral block or thoracic epidural, based on robust evidence derived from randomized controlled trials (presented in the Procedure Specific Postoperative Pain Management, www.postoppain.org (accessed on 20 December 2024)). Additionally, the PROSPECT recommendations do not support the perioperative use of gabapentinoids, ketamine, or dexmedetomidine in open thoracotomies, due to inconsistent evidence. If a paravertebral block or thoracic epidural is not feasible due to anticoagulation or patient preference, the use of strong systemic opioids alongside non-opioid analgesia is recommended as a rescue measure.
However, this raises the question: does the inability to use regional techniques mean that opioid-free (OFA) or opioid-sparing (OSA) anesthesia is not feasible in open thoracotomies? Thoracic surgery is a significantly challenging field associated with a higher rate of pain and pulmonary complications compared to other types of surgery. Experience in OFA/OSA techniques gained in other surgical fields probably cannot be directly applied to thoracic surgery. In the first systematic review and meta-analysis of opioid-free anesthesia in thoracic surgery by D’Amico et al., where the primary outcome was the occurrence of any postoperative complication, six studies were included as relevant [12]. In reviewing the OFA/OSA protocols all studies incorporated either paravertebral block (PVB), serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) or erector spinae plane block (ESPB). Patients in the OFA group exhibited a significant reduction in the postoperative complication rate compared to OBA. PACU length of stay was similar between the two groups and better analgesia with less opioid consumption at 48 h after surgery was observed in the OFA group.
The significance of a perioperative strategy that minimizes or eliminates opioid use in thoracic surgery on patient outcomes is emphasized in a recent retrospective study by J. Xiao et al. In their study, the authors conclude that the amount of opioid medication received during hospitalization was an independent risk factor for postoperative complications [10]. Additionally, several studies have demonstrated a correlation between intraoperative and postoperative opioid administration, the development of chronic pain, opioid addiction, and patient survival [11,20,21,22,23].
In our study, the lower levels of reported pain within the OSA-A group may be attributed to the perioperative use of agents affecting both nociceptive and neuropathic elements of pain, such as pregabalin, dexmedetomidine, ketamine, lidocaine, tramadol and magnesium sulphate [24,25,26,27]. It is essential to recognize that pain after thoracotomy may arise from both nociceptive and neuropathic mechanisms, with opioids frequently demonstrating limited efficacy in the alleviation of neuropathic pain [24,25]. In the study by Homma et al., the preoperative use of hypnotics, thoracotomy, and a duration of surgery ≥ 2.5 h were associated with an increased risk of neuropathic pain post-thoracic surgery [27]. If neuropathic pain is left untreated, it interferes with sleep and is associated with depression and anxiety that will negatively influence the responses to analgesic drugs [24].
First-line drugs for neuropathic pain include antidepressants (tricyclic antidepressants and serotonin–noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors) and anticonvulsants acting at calcium channels (pregabalin and gabapentin). Second- and third-line drugs for neuropathic pain include topical lidocaine and opioids [24]. Opioids are not considered as first choice agents, because of adverse drug reactions and, more recently, because of concerns about abuse, diversion, and addiction [25,28]. Furthermore, the use of intraoperative opioids may be linked to postoperative hyperalgesia and tolerance, resulting in elevated pain scores and increased opioid consumption [10,29,30].
Our results do not agree with those of a recent retrospective study by Devine et al., where no significant differences in referred pain scores were found within the first 24 h after surgery, when comparing an OFA to a standard opioid-based (OBA) technique [30]. It is important to note that their protocols differed from ours, as regional blocks were utilized in both groups. Their OFA technique included intravenous lidocaine (0.75–1 mg/kg) and magnesium sulfate (0.05–0.1 mmol/kg) with propofol and a paravertebral block. Their OBA technique involved intraoperative fentanyl, remifentanil, and/or morphine for analgesia, plus paracetamol and parecoxib when appropriate. All patients received morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) for the first 24 h.
Our protocol incorporates the perioperative use of pregabalin in a dose tailored to patient needs and assessment. Pregabalin is an analogue of γ-aminobutyric acid that binds to the α2-δ subunits of voltage-gated calcium channels in the central nervous system. When used in a perioperative setting, pregabalin can help prevent the development of pain by inhibiting presynaptic voltage-gated calcium channels, which are involved in central sensitization [31]. Pregabalin was preferred to gabapentin due to its more established anxiolytic and analgesic effects and safer profile [32]. Pregabalin has linear pharmacokinetics, dose adjustment is easier, analgesic effects occur faster than gabapentin and exhibits positive effects on anxiety and sleep [33].
Pregabalin was administered preoperatively, on the evening prior to surgery and again on the morning of the procedure, in a dosage ranging from 25 mg to 150 mg. Postoperatively, the administration of pregabalin continued throughout the duration of hospitalization and was extended for the first month after surgery. A study conducted by Homma et al. reported a significant preventive effect on postoperative neuropathic pain in patients who received 25 mg of oral pregabalin twice daily from postoperative day 2 (POD 2) through three months following lung resection [34]. Additional studies have demonstrated the efficacy of perioperative administration of pregabalin for pain management after thoracic surgery [35,36,37]; however, the results have yet to achieve a consistent level of acceptance across the literature. In a very recent meta-analysis by Zhang and Zhang, data from five RCTs and 329 patients undergoing thoracic surgery confirmed that pregabalin was effective to significantly reduce pain at 24 h and the incidence of persistent neuropathic pain [38]. The authors comment that the doses and use of pregabalin in the various studies were not completely the same, which may have caused some heterogeneity. In this context, the decisions regarding when to start treatment, the initial dosage, titration protocols, and the suggested duration of administration are still unclear. Since higher dosages, particularly those exceeding 150 mg, are linked to increased sedation levels, we have chosen to begin treatment with an initial dosing titration range of 25 mg to 150 mg. In selecting the appropriate dosage, we carefully considered various factors, including the patient’s age, weight, and overall health assessment. Additionally, we made necessary dose adjustments for patients classified as ASA-3 and for individuals identified as underweight, specifically those with a Body Mass Index (BMI) of less than 20. The analgesic efficacy of ketamine has been well established in various surgical contexts [39,40,41]. In addition to its well-known analgesic effects, primarily mediated by NMDA receptor antagonism, ketamine exhibits several other beneficial effects, including anti-inflammatory and anti-hyperalgesic properties [40]. Administering an initial bolus of ketamine at the onset of anesthesia, followed by an intraoperative infusion or additional boluses, has been shown to significantly improve postoperative pain control, while it also reduced the need for opioids by 30–40% [39]. It can be administered through several routes, including oral, intravenous, epidural, and wound infiltration. The dosing of ketamine also varies, ranging from single-dose boluses of up to 1 mg/kg to continuous iv infusions of up to 0.18 mg/kg/h for 48 h postoperatively [39]. In our protocol, we routinely administered ketamine in two boluses: the first during anesthesia induction at a dose of 0.5–1 mg/kg, and the second 20 min before surgical closure at a dose of 20–30 mg. These doses are considered low for postoperative pain management (defined as no more than 1.2 mg/kg/h when used as a continuous infusion and no more than 1 mg/kg when given as a bolus) [42].
Magnesium sulphate (MgSO4) has been shown to produce an antinociceptive effect on animal models of neuropathic and inflammatory pain [43]. It possesses opioid-sparing effects by blocking the NMDA receptor and central sensitization, similarly to ketamine [43,44]. A recent metanalysis of randomized trials supported the perioperative use of magnesium as an analgesic adjuvant at 24 h following thoracic surgery, but no opioid-sparing effect at 48 h post-surgery was exhibited [45]. In the study of Abdelgalil et al. the combined preoperative single dose of pregabalin and magnesium sulfate was associated with reduced postoperative pain and total morphine consumption in patients undergoing thoracotomy [46].
Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective α2-adrenergic agonist known for its ability to inhibit norepinephrine release, thereby suppressing sympathetic activity within the central nervous system [47,48]. It exhibits analgesic and sedation properties that have increasingly been used to reduce postoperative opioid consumption [49,50,51]. In the context of thoracic surgery, propensity-matched studies examining intraoperative dexmedetomidine infusions have demonstrated no significant differences in pain scores or opioid consumption throughout the hospital stay [52,53]. These varying outcomes indicate that discrepancies in the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine-based opioid-sparing analgesia may arise from differences in administration protocols, including the use of adjunct medications, dosing strategies, timing of infusions, and the characteristics of patient populations.
Post thoracotomy pain syndrome (PTPS) is characterized by an aching sensation in the distribution of the incision, and it usually resolves within 2 months postoperatively [54]. Pain that persists or recurs for longer than 3 months after thoracic surgery is defined as chronic post-thoracotomy pain (CPTP). Its reported prevalence rates range from 27% to 47% and many survivors of lung cancer experience a substantial decline in their functional capacity and overall quality of life because of CPTP [5,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62]. The World Health Organization included detailed diagnostic criteria in the 11th revision of the International Classification of Disease (ICD-11), where CPTP was defined as any unpleasant or painful sensation persisting or recurring more than three months after surgery in relation to the operation area [63].
Open thoracotomy is associated with higher risk of CPTP [64]. Compared with nociceptive pain, neuropathic pain is claimed to be the major cause of PPSP after breast and thoracic surgeries [64,65]. In our study 68 patients (46 belonging to the OSA-A group and 22 to the OBA-A group) were assessed for CPTP. Ιn accordance with the literature, 27 patients reported chronic pain (39.7%). Noteworthy, no patient in both cohorts was diagnosed with neuropathic pain, using the PainDETECT questionnaire.

5. Limitations

This study has several potential limitations, primarily stemming from its retrospective nature and the characteristics of the data sources used. As a retrospective study, it was influenced by the lack of blinding for the anesthesiologists in both groups, which introduces the possibility of bias. Another significant drawback of this study design was the limited control over the sampling of the population. A major issue we encountered was missing data, which posed substantial challenges in our analysis. The initial one-to-one matching was not feasible due to incomplete medical records. Furthermore, our attempts to recruit additional patients for the OBA-A group in recent years have uncovered problems within the hospital’s registry. Parameters that were important or relevant were not recorded in the health record. Confounding variables and causality are difficult to prove, as in all observational studies.
Despite these limitations, the retrospective design reflects real-life clinical practice, which contrasts with randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that typically involve highly selected patient populations enrolled under strict eligibility criteria.

6. Conclusions

Our findings support the use of a multimodal, opioid-sparing perioperative anesthesia and analgesia strategy for patients undergoing open thoracotomies, which could be considered in situations where a regional nerve block or thoracic epidural are not feasible due to anticoagulation or patient refusal. Implementing this protocol in our patients resulted not only in improved pain control but also in a better quality of recovery. Further well-designed prospective randomized studies are necessary to clarify specific opioid-free or opioid-sparing perioperative protocols that will enhance pain management and improve patient outcomes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.N. and G.S.; Data curation, V.N., G.S., G.P., E.D., E.K. and P.V.; Formal analysis, G.S., G.P., G.G. and A.P.; Investigation, V.N., G.S., E.D., E.K. and P.V.; Methodology, V.N., G.S. and G.P.; Software, G.P. and G.G.; Supervision, V.N.; Writing—original draft, V.N.; Writing—review & editing, V.N., G.S., G.G., M.B. and A.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Research Ethics Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of the University Hospital of Heraklion (Registration number 14/18-09-2019; Registration date 18 September 2019).

Informed Consent Statement

As this investigation is retrospective in nature, authorization was granted to waive the requirement for written informed consent.

Data Availability Statement

The data on which this retrospective study is based can be obtained from the corresponding author upon reasonable request, provided that the copyrights of the respective authors are respected.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
OSA-AOpioid-Sparing Anesthesia-Analgesia
OBA-AOpioid-Based Anesthesia-Analgesia
PACUPost Anesthesia Care Unit
PTPSPost-Thoracotomy Pain Syndrome
MEDMorphine Equivalent Dose
ASAAmerican Society of Anesthesiology
RSIRapid Sequence Induction
NSAIDNon-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug
PCAPatient Controlled Analgesia
PODPost-Operative Day
NRSNumerical Rate Scale
ANOVAANalysis Of Variance
FDRFalse Discovery Rate
BMIBody Mass Index
VATSVideo-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery
OFAOpioid-Free Anesthesia
OSAOpioid-Sparing Anesthesia
OBAOpioid-Based Anesthesia
PVBParaVertebral Block
SAPBSerratus Anterior Plane Block
ESPBErector Spinae Plane Block
RCTRandomized Controlled Trial
NMDAN-Methyl-D-aspartic Acid
CPTPchronic post-thoracotomy pain
ICDInternational Classification of Disease

References

  1. Schwarzova, K.; Whitman, G.; Cha, S. Developments in Postoperative Analgesia in Open and Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery Over the Past Decade. Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2024, 36, 378–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bello, M.; Oger, S.; Bedon-Carte, S.; Vielstadte, C.; Leo, F.; Zaouter, C.; Ouattara, A. Effect of Opioid-Free Anaesthesia on Postoperative Epidural Ropivacaine Requirement After Thoracic Surgery: A Retrospective Unmatched Case-Control Study. Anaesth. Crit. Care Pain Med. 2019, 38, 499–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mesbah, A.; Yeung, J.; Gao, F. Pain after Thoracotomy. BJA Educ. 2016, 16, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Arends, S.; Böhmer, A.B.; Poels, M.; Schieren, M.; Koryllos, A.; Wappler, F.; Joppich, R. Post-thoracotomy pain syndrome: Seldom severe, often neuropathic, treated unspecific, and insufficient. Pain Rep. 2020, 5, e810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Bayman, E.O.; Brennan, T.J. Incidence and severity of chronic pain at 3 and 6 months after thoracotomy: Meta-analysis. J. Pain 2014, 15, 887–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Andersen, C.; Ørding, H.; Licht, P.B.; Toft, P. From acute to chronic pain after thoracic surgery: The significance of different components of the acute pain response. J. Pain Res. 2018, 11, 1541–1548. [Google Scholar]
  7. Goto, T. What Is the Best Pain Control After Thoracic Surgery? J. Thorac. Dis. 2018, 10, 1335–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. D’Ercole, F.; Arora, H.; Kumar, P.A. for Thoracic Surgery. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 2018, 32, 915–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lee, L.A.; Caplan, R.A.; Stephens, L.S.; Posner, K.L.; Terman, G.W.; Voepel-Lewis, T.; Domino, K.B. Postoperative opioid-induced respiratory depression: A closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology 2015, 122, 659–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xiao, J.; Nguyen, D.T.; Lichtenberg, Z.K.; Rizk, E.; Meisenbach, L.M.; Chihara, R.; Graviss, E.A.; Kim, M.P. Opioid use in thoracic surgery: A retrospective study on postoperative complications. J. Thorac. Dis. 2024, 16, 6827–6834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Huh, J.; Hwang, W. The Role of Anesthetic Management in Lung Cancer Recurrence and Metastasis: A Comprehensive Review. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 6681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. D’Amico, F.; Barucco, G.; Licheri, M.; Valsecchi, G.; Zaraca, L.; Mucchetti, M.; Zangrillo, A.; Monaco, F. Opioid Free Anesthesia in Thoracic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 6955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mauermann, E.; Ruppen, W.; Bandschapp, O. Different protocols used today to achieve total opioid-free general anesthesia without locoregional blocks. Best. Pract. Res. Clin. Anaesthesiol. 2017, 31, 533–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Şentürk, M.; Özcan, P.E.; Talu, G.K.; Kiyan, E.; Çamci, E.; Özyalçin, S.; Dilege, Ş.; Pembeci, K. The Effects of Three Different Analgesia Techniques on Long-Term Postthoracotomy Pain. Anesth. Analg. 2002, 94, 11–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Available online: https://esaic.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/conversion-tables-for-iv-and-oral-analgesics.pdf (accessed on 28 December 2024).
  16. Freynhagen, R.; Baron, R.; Gockel, U.; Tölle, T.R. painDETECT: A new screening questionnaire to identify neuropathic components in patients with back pain. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 2006, 22, 1911–1920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Ross, J.D.W.; Cole, C.M.W.; Lo, W.; Ura, M. Postoperative Pain in Thoracic Surgical Patients: An Analysis of Factors Associated with Acute and Chronic Pain. Heart Lung Circ. 2021, 30, 1244–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sengupta, S. Post-operative pulmonary complications after thoracotomy. Indian J. Anaesth. 2015, 59, 618–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Patvardhan, C.; Ferrante, M. Opiate free anaesthesia and future of thoracic surgery anaesthesia. J. Vis. Surg. 2018, 4, 253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hah, J.M.; Bateman, B.T.; Ratliff, J.; Curtin, C.; Sun, E. Chronic Opioid Use After Surgery: Implications for Perioperative Management in the Face of the Opioid Epidemic. Anesth. Analg. 2017, 125, 1733–1740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wiltse Nicely, K.L.; Friend, R.; Robichaux, C.; Edwards, J.A.; Cimiotti, J.P.; Dupree Jones, K. Association Between Intra- and Postoperative Opioids in Opioid-Naïve Patients in Thoracic Surgery. Ann. Thorac. Surg. Short. Rep. 2024, 2, 865–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chancellor, W.Z.; Mehaffey, J.H.; Desai, R.P.; Beller, J.; Balkrishnan, R.; Walters, D.M.; Martin, L.W. Prolonged Opioid Use Associated with Reduced Survival After Lung Cancer Resection. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2021, 111, 1791–1798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Fornasari, D. Pharmacotherapy for Neuropathic Pain: A Review. Pain Ther. 2017, 6 (Suppl. S1), 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Moisset, X. Neuropathic pain: Evidence based recommendations. Presse Med. 2024, 53, 104232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Forget, P. Opioid-free anaesthesia. Why and how? A contextual analysis. Anaesth. Crit. Care Pain Med. 2019, 38, 169–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Guastella, V.; Mick, G.; Soriano, C.; Vallet, L.; Escande, G.; Dubray, C.; Eschalier, A. A prospective study of neuropathic pain induced by thoracotomy: Incidence, clinical description, and diagnosis. Pain 2011, 152, 74–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Homma, T.; Doki, Y.; Yamamoto, Y.; Ojima, T.; Shimada, Y.; Kitamura, N.; Yoshimura, N. Risk factors of neuropathic pain after thoracic surgery. J. Thorac. Dis. 2018, 10, 2898–2907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Colvin, L.A.; Bull, F.; Hales, T.G. Perioperative opioid analgesia-when is enough too much? A review of opioid-induced tolerance and hyperalgesia. Lancet 2019, 393, 1558–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Humble, S.R.; Dalton, A.J.; Li, L. Interventions to reduce acute and chronic post-surgical pain. EJP 2015, 19, 451–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Devine, G.; Cheng, M.; Martinez, G.; Patvardhan, C.; Aresu, G.; Peryt, A.; Coonar, A.S.; Roscoe, A. Opioid-Free Anesthesia for Lung Cancer Resection: A Case-Control Study. J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 2020, 34, 3036–3040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Brulotte, V.; Ruel, M.M.; Lafontaine, E.; Chouinard, P.; Girard, F. Impact of Pregabalin on the occurrence of postthoracotomy pain syndrome: A randomized trial. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 2015, 40, 262–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Fabritius, M.L.; Geisler, A.; Petersen, P.L.; Nikolajsen, L.; Hansen, M.S.; Kontinen, V.; Hamunen, K.; Dahl, J.B.; Wetterslev, J.; Mathiesen, O. Gabapentin for post-operative pain management—A systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 2016, 60, 1188–1208, Erratum in Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 2017, 61, 357–359. [Google Scholar]
  33. Yalşi, E.; Yakşi, O. Current treatment options for post-thoracotomy pain syndrome: A review. Curr. Thorac. Surg. 2017, 2, 103–110. [Google Scholar]
  34. Homma, T.; Doki, Y.; Yamamoto, Y.; Ojima, T.; Shimada, Y.; Kitamura, N.; Akemoto, Y.; Hida, Y.; Yoshimura, N. Efficacy of 50 mg pregabalin for prevention of postoperative neuropathic pain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and thoracotomy: A 3-month prospective randomized controlled trial. J. Thorac. Dis. 2019, 11, 694–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Matsutani, N.; Kawamura, M. Successful management of postoperative pain with pregabalin after thoracotomy. Surg. Today 2014, 44, 712–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Matsutani, N.; Dejima, H.; Takahashi, Y.; Kawamura, M. Pregabalin reduces post-surgical pain after thoracotomy: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Surg. Today 2015, 45, 1411–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kim, J.C.; Byun, S.; Kim, S.; Lee, S.Y.; Lee, J.H.; Ahn, S. Effect of preoperative pregabalin as an adjunct to a multimodal analgesic regimen in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Medicine 2017, 96, e8644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Zhang, L.; Zhang, H. The efficacy of pregabalin for pain control after thoracic surgery: A meta-analysis. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2024, 19, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jouguelet-Lacoste, J.; La Colla, L.; Schilling, D.; Chelly, J.E. The use of intravenous infusion or single dose of low-dose ketamine for postoperative analgesia: A review of the current literature. Pain Med. 2015, 16, 383–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gharaei, B.; Jafari, A.; Aghamohammadi, H.; Salimi, A. Opioid-sparing effect of preemptive bolus low-dose ketamine for moderate sedation in opioid abusers undergoing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: A randomized clinical trial. Anesth. Analg. 2013, 116, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Moyse, D.W.; Kaye, A.D.; Diaz, J.H.; Qadri, M.Y.; Lindsay, D.; Pyati, S. Perioperative Ketamine Administration for Thoracotomy Pain. Pain Physician 2017, 20, 173–184. [Google Scholar]
  42. Schmid, R.L.; Sandler, A.N.; Katz, J. Use and efficacy of low-dose ketamine in the management of acute postoperative pain: A review of current techniques and outcomes. Pain 1999, 82, 111–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Srebro, D.; Vuckovic, S.; Milovanovic, A.; Kosutic, J.; Vujovic, K.S.; Prostran, M. Magnesium in Pain Research: State of the Art. Curr. Med. Chem. 2017, 24, 424–434. [Google Scholar]
  44. Vanstone, R.J.; Rockett, M. Use of atypical analgesics by intravenous infusion (IV) for acute pain: Evidence base for lidocaine, ketamine and magnesium. Anesth. Intensive Care Med. 2016, 17, 460–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hung, K.C.; Yang, S.H.; Liao, S.W.; Yu, C.H.; Liu, M.Y.; Chen, J.Y. Effects of perioperative magnesium on postoperative analgesia following thoracic surgery: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Magnes. Res. 2024, 36, 54–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Salah Abdelgalil, A.; Shoukry, A.; Kamel, M.; Heikal, A.; Ahmed, N. Analgesic Potentials of Preoperative Oral Pregabalin, Intravenous Magnesium Sulfate, and their Combination in Acute Postthoracotomy Pain. Clin. J. Pain 2019, 35, 247–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Lee, S. Dexmedetomidine: Present and future directions. Korean J. Anesthesiol. 2019, 72, 323–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Weerink, M.A.S.; Struys, M.; Hannivoort, L.N.; Barends, C.R.M.; Absalom, A.R.; Colin, P. Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Dexmedetomidine. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 2017, 56, 893–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Beloeil, H.; Garot, M.; Lebuffe, G.; Gerbaud, A.; Bila, J.; Cuvillon, P.; Dubout, E.; Oger, S.; Nadaud, J.; Becret, A.; et al. Balanced Opioid-free Anesthesia with Dexmedetomidine versus Balanced Anesthesia with Remifentanil for Major or Intermediate Noncardiac Surgery. Anesthesiology 2021, 134, 541–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhao, Y.; He, J.; Yu, N.; Jia, C.; Wang, S. Mechanisms of Dexmedetomidine in Neuropathic Pain. Front. Neurosci. 2020, 14, 330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wang, K.; Wu, M.; Xu, J.; Wu, C.; Zhang, B.; Wang, G.; Ma, D. Effects of dexmedetomidine on perioperative stress, inflammation, and immune function: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Br. J. Anaesth. 2019, 123, 777–794. [Google Scholar]
  52. Mena, G.E.; Zorrilla-Vaca, A.; Vaporciyan, A.; Mehran, R.; Lasala, J.D.; Williams, W.; Patel, C.; Woodward, T.; Kruse, B.; Joshi, G.; et al. Intraoperative Dexmedetomidine and Ketamine Infusions in an Enhanced Recovery After Thoracic Surgery Program: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis. J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 2022, 36, 1064–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Larue, A.; Jacquet-Lagreze, M.; Ruste, M.; Tronc, F.; Fellahi, J.L. Opioid-free anaesthesia for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: A retrospective cohort study with propensity score analysis. Anaesth. Crit. Care Pain Med. 2022, 41, 101089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Miyazaki, T.; Doi, R.; Matsumoto, K. Post-thoracotomy pain syndrome in the era of minimally invasive thoracic surgery. J. Thorac. Dis. 2024, 16, 3422–3430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Gerner, P. Postthoracotomy pain management problems. Anesthesiol. Clin. 2008, 26, 355–367, vii. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Hersini, K.J.; Andreasen, J.J.; Birthe Dinesen, P.G.; Arendt-Nielsen, L. Prevalence, characteristics and impact of the post-thoracotomy pain syndrome on quality of life: A cross-sectional study. J. Pain Reli 2015, 4, 1000201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Bayman, E.O.; Parekh, K.R.; Keech, J.; Selte, A.; Brennan, T.J. A prospective study of chronic pain after thoracic surgery. Anesthesiology 2017, 126, 938–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kampe, S.; Geismann, B.; Weinreich, G.; Stamatis, G.; Ebmeyer, U.; Gerbershagen, H.J. The influence of type of anesthesia, perioperative pain, and preoperative health status on chronic pain six months after thoracotomy—A prospective cohort study. Pain Med. 2016, 18, pnw230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hetmann, F.; Kongsgaard, U.E.; Sandvik, L.; Schou-Bredal, I. Prevalence and predictors of persistent post-surgical pain 12 months after thoracotomy. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 2015, 59, 740–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hetmann, F.; Kongsgaard, U.E.; Sandvik, L.; Schou-Bredal, I. Post-thoracotomy pain syndrome and sensory disturbances following thoracotomy at 6- and 12-month follow-ups. J. Pain Res. 2017, 10, 663–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Bayman, E.O.; Lennertz, R.; Brennan, T.J. Pain-related limitations in daily activities following thoracic surgery in a United States population. Pain Physician 2017, 20, E367–E378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Perttunen, K.; Tasmuth, T.; Kalso, E. Chronic pain after thoracic surgery: A follow-up study. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 1999, 43, 563–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Schug, S.A.; Lavand’homme, P.; Barke, A.; Korwisi, B.; Rief, W.; Treede, R.D. The IASP classification of chronic pain for ICD-11, chronic postsurgical or posttraumatic pain. Pain 2019, 160, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Lim, J.; Chen, D.; McNicol, E.; Sharma, L.; Varaday, G.; Sharma, A.; Wilson, E.; Wright-Yatsko, T.; Yaeger, L.; Gilron, I.; et al. Risk factors for persistent pain after breast and thoracic surgeries: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Pain 2022, 163, 3–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Kehlet, H.; Jensen, T.S.; Woolf, C.J. Persistent postsurgical pain: Risk factors and prevention. Lancet 2006, 367, 1618–1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Flow chart of patients’ recruitment.
Figure 1. Flow chart of patients’ recruitment.
Jcm 14 01820 g001
Figure 2. Pain scores during rest (A) NRS rest, cough (B) (NRS cough) and motion (C) (NRS motion) in PACU (POD0), POD1 and POD2. Note that the OSA-A group reported significantly lower levels of pain at all-time points.
Figure 2. Pain scores during rest (A) NRS rest, cough (B) (NRS cough) and motion (C) (NRS motion) in PACU (POD0), POD1 and POD2. Note that the OSA-A group reported significantly lower levels of pain at all-time points.
Jcm 14 01820 g002
Figure 3. Comparison of analgesic requirements between the OSA-A and OBA-A groups, measured in MED, in PACU (POD 0) and on POD 1 and POD 2. Notably, a significant reduction in analgesic requirement was observed only during the PACU stay.
Figure 3. Comparison of analgesic requirements between the OSA-A and OBA-A groups, measured in MED, in PACU (POD 0) and on POD 1 and POD 2. Notably, a significant reduction in analgesic requirement was observed only during the PACU stay.
Jcm 14 01820 g003
Table 1. Perioperative protocols in OBA-A and OSA-A groups.
Table 1. Perioperative protocols in OBA-A and OSA-A groups.
OBA-A GroupOSA-A GroupComments
Premedication
Night before surgery
Anxiolysis Bromazepam 1.5 mg orally (po)Pregabalin 25–150 mg po
Amitriptyline 10 mg po
Pregabalin tailored to patients’ needs/status
Low-dose Amitriptyline for its antinociceptive and anti-salivary actions, if not contraindicated due to patients’ comorbidities
Premedication
Day of surgery
Midazolam 0.05 mg/kg
intramuscularly (im)
Pregabalin 25–150 mg po
Amitriptyline 10 mg po
Anesthesia Inductionintravenously (iv)
iv Fentanyl 150–200 mcg
iv Dexmedetomidine loading dose 1 mcg/kg administrated over 15 min
iv Propofol 2–2.5 mg/kgiv Midazolam 2–5 mg
iv Rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg (1.2 mg/kg if RSI)iv Ketamine 0.5–1.0 mg/kg
Oriv Propofol 1–2 mg/kg
iv Cis-Atracurium 0.2 mg/kgiv Lidocaine 1 mg/kg
* Surgical site infiltration prior to incision with Ropivacaine (10–15 mL Ropivacaine 0.75%)iv Rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg (1.2 mg/kg if RSI)
iv Magnesium Sulphate 30–40 mg/kg as bolus over 15 min
iv Dexamethasone 8–16 mg
* Surgical site infiltration prior to incision with Ropivacaine (10–15 mL Ropivacaine 0.75%)
Prior to incisioniv Fentanyl 50–100 mcgiv Dexmedetomidine infusion 0.6–1.2 mcg/kg/h
Oriv Lidocaine infusion 1 mg/kg/h
iv Remifentanil infusion 0.05–0.25 mcg/kg/hiv Paracetamol 1 gr
iv NSAID (Parecoxib 40 mg or Dexketoprofen 50 mg)
Anesthesia maintenanceVolatile anesthesiaVolatile anesthesia
Intraoperative antinociceptioniv Remifentanil infusion 0.05–0.25 mcg/kg/hiv Lidocaine infusion 0.5–1 mg/kg/h
Oriv Dexmedetomidine 0.4–1 mcg/kg/h
iv boluses of Fentanyl 50–100 mcg as requirediv boluses of 20–30 mg of Ketamine as required
iv bolus of 2.5 g Magnesium sulphate
20 min prior to surgical closureiv NSAID if no contraindication
(Parecoxib 40 mg or Dexketoprofen 50 mg)
iv bolus of 20–30 mg of Ketamine
iv Paracetamol 1 giv Tramadol 100 mg
iv Morphine 0.05–0.15 mg/kg
PACUiv bolus of Morphine 2 mgiv Ketamine 30–50 mgIf patient’s pain score at rest ≥6 in the numerical rating scale score 0–10
± iv Magnesium sulphate 2.5 g
± iv Midazolam 1–2 mg
iv Pethidine 20–30 mgiv Pethidine 20–30 mgIf shivering
iv Tramadol 100 mgRescue therapy
Surgical Ward
48 h after surgery
iv Paracetamol 1 gr every 8 hiv Paracetamol 1 gr every 8 h
iv PCA Morphine (Morphine solution 0.5 mg/mL) with an infusion rate 0.5–1 mg/h and possibility of bolus 1 mg every 10 min, if no contraindication, under continuous monitoring with pulse oximetryiv Tramadol (max daily dose 300 mg)
po Pregabalin 25–150 mg daily dose, given in titrated doses
Rescue therapy: im Pethidine 50–75 mg
* In the OBA-A group, the option of wound infiltration with ropivacaine was available prior to incision, according to surgeon preference, as per our department’s protocol. Thus, the same option was also available for subsequent patients in the OSA-A group.
Table 2. Opioid conversion table used to equate equivalent iv morphine values [15].
Table 2. Opioid conversion table used to equate equivalent iv morphine values [15].
Total Daily Dose (IV)Morphine Equivalent Dose (mg)
1 mcg fentanyl iv 0.066 mg morphine iv
1 mg oxycodone iv 1.5 mg morphine iv
1 mg tramadol 0.1 mg morphine iv
1 mg pethidine iv 0.13 mg morphine iv
Table 3. Patients’ characteristics.
Table 3. Patients’ characteristics.
Characteristic OSA-A
( x ¯ ± SD)
OBA-A
( x ¯ ± SD)
p-ValueStatistical Test
Age (y) 62.55 ± 11.2963.73 ± 12.550.6270Unpaired two-tailed t test
Weight (kg) 79.50 ± 15.3377.43 ± 13.280.4864Unpaired two-tailed t test
Height (m) 1.698 ± 0.070951.678 ± 0.080570.1996Unpaired two-tailed t test
BMI (kg ∗ m−2) 27.56 ± 5.05027.40 ± 3.7510.8658Unpaired two-tailed t test
SexMale48280.3394Fisher’s exact test two-sided
Female1212
ASA
physical
status
1010.0208Fisher’s exact test two-sided
23916
32122
401
Type of surgeryLobectomy39230.3728Fisher’s exact test two-sided
Segmentectomy1412
Pneumonectomy30
Other (biopsy, talc pleurodesis etc.)45
DepressionYes 770.5576Fisher’s exact test two-sided
No5333
AnxietyYes 20110.6599 Fisher’s exact test two-sided
No4029
Alcohol Use DisorderYes610.2375Fisher’s exact test two-sided
No5439
Preoperative chronic pain medication useYes1330.0930Fisher’s exact test two-sided
No4737
Preoperative chronic opioid useYes310.6479Fisher’s exact test two-sided
No5739
Preoperative Steroid use (6 months)Yes500.0813Fisher’s exact test two-sided
No5540
BMI: Body Mass Index; ASA physical status: American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status.
Table 4. Secondary outcomes in OSA-A and OBA-A groups.
Table 4. Secondary outcomes in OSA-A and OBA-A groups.
Secondary
Outcome
OSA-A
( x ¯ ± SD)
OBA-A
( x ¯ ± SD)
p-ValueStatistical Test
Length of stay PACU (h) 2.030 ± 1.0223.125 ± 1.036<0.0001Mann-Whitney U test
Length of stay Hospital (d) 5.767 ± 3.4515.725 ± 2.0500.2669Mann-Whitney U test
Analgesics Requested PACU (POD 0)Yes21270.0021Fisher’s exact test
No3913
Analgesics Requested POD 1Yes32>0.9999Fisher’s exact test
No5738
Analgesics Requested POD 2Yes10>0.9999Fisher’s exact test
No5940
Morphine (mg) Equivalents DeliveredPACU1.177 ± 2.9295.031 ± 5.7050.000005Multiple Mann-Whitney U tests correcting for multiple comparisons by using the FDR method
POD122.863 ± 12.76021.878 ± 14.2880.362445
POD216.542 ± 14.72316.234 ± 16.6610.631847
Intestinal Mobilization POD 1Yes518<0.0001Fisher’s exact test
No932
Intestinal Mobilization POD 2Yes5822<0.0001Fisher’s exact test
No218
Nausea & Vomiting POD 1Yes150.0363Fisher’s exact test
No5935
Nausea & Vomiting POD 2Yes040.0204Fisher’s exact test
No6034
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nyktari, V.; Stefanakis, G.; Papastratigakis, G.; Diamantaki, E.; Koutoulaki, E.; Vasilos, P.; Giannakakis, G.; Bareka, M.; Papaioannou, A. Is a Perioperative Opioid-Sparing Anesthesia-Analgesia Strategy Feasible in Open Thoracotomies? Findings from a Retrospective Matched Cohort Study. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 1820. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14061820

AMA Style

Nyktari V, Stefanakis G, Papastratigakis G, Diamantaki E, Koutoulaki E, Vasilos P, Giannakakis G, Bareka M, Papaioannou A. Is a Perioperative Opioid-Sparing Anesthesia-Analgesia Strategy Feasible in Open Thoracotomies? Findings from a Retrospective Matched Cohort Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025; 14(6):1820. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14061820

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nyktari, Vasileia, Georgios Stefanakis, Georgios Papastratigakis, Eleni Diamantaki, Emmanouela Koutoulaki, Periklis Vasilos, Giorgos Giannakakis, Metaxia Bareka, and Alexandra Papaioannou. 2025. "Is a Perioperative Opioid-Sparing Anesthesia-Analgesia Strategy Feasible in Open Thoracotomies? Findings from a Retrospective Matched Cohort Study" Journal of Clinical Medicine 14, no. 6: 1820. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14061820

APA Style

Nyktari, V., Stefanakis, G., Papastratigakis, G., Diamantaki, E., Koutoulaki, E., Vasilos, P., Giannakakis, G., Bareka, M., & Papaioannou, A. (2025). Is a Perioperative Opioid-Sparing Anesthesia-Analgesia Strategy Feasible in Open Thoracotomies? Findings from a Retrospective Matched Cohort Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(6), 1820. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14061820

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop