Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (52)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = radiomics quality score

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
14 pages, 328 KiB  
Systematic Review
Role of Radiomics to Predict Malignant Transformation of Sinonasal Inverted Papilloma: A Systematic Review
by Caitlin Waters, Avinash Deshwal, Tom O. Cuddihy, Holly Jones, Hugo C. Temperley, Hannah Kaye-Coyle, Niall J. O’Sullivan, Benjamin M. Mac Curtain, Michael E. Kelly and Orla Young
Cancers 2025, 17(13), 2175; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17132175 - 27 Jun 2025
Viewed by 369
Abstract
Introduction: Sinonasal inverted papilloma is a benign but aggressive tumour of the sinonasal tract. It has the potential for malignant transformation into sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma. Radiomics, which involves the extraction and analysis of quantitative imaging features, has emerged as a promising tool [...] Read more.
Introduction: Sinonasal inverted papilloma is a benign but aggressive tumour of the sinonasal tract. It has the potential for malignant transformation into sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma. Radiomics, which involves the extraction and analysis of quantitative imaging features, has emerged as a promising tool in prediction of tumour behaviour. This systematic review aims to critically evaluate the current literature on the application of radiomics in predicting the malignant transformation of sinonasal inverted papilloma. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across Medline (via PubMed), EMBASE, and Web of Science. Studies investigating the use of radiomics to predict malignant transformation in sinonasal inverted papilloma were selected based on predefined inclusion criteria. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool and the Radiomics Quality Score (RQS). Results: Five studies were included, encompassing 837 participants. All studies were retrospective and utilised MRI-based radiomics in the construction of their models. The radiomic models demonstrated satisfactory predictive performance. The median AUCs across the included studies were 0.954 (range: 0.901–0.987) in the training set and 0.914 (range: 0.8–0.989) in the validation set. Conclusions: This systematic review highlights the potential of radiomics as a predictive tool for the malignant transformation of sinonasal inverted papilloma. Radiomics shows promise as a non-invasive adjunct for clinical decision-making. However, further research is needed to standardise methodologies and validate these findings in larger multicentre cohorts. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Radiomics in Cancer Diagnosis, Prognosis and Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 2105 KiB  
Systematic Review
18F-FDG PET/CT Semiquantitative and Radiomic Features for Assessing Pathologic Axillary Lymph Node Status in Clinical Stage I–III Breast Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review
by Anna Hwang, Sana Rashid, Selina Shi, Ciara Blew, Mark Levine and Ashirbani Saha
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(6), 300; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32060300 - 23 May 2025
Viewed by 706
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate associations between 18F-FDG-PET/CT semiquantitative and radiomic features with pathologic axillary lymph node (ALN) status in stages I–III breast cancer patients. Methods: A search was conducted across MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases. Quality assessment was performed with QUADAS-2 and the radiomics [...] Read more.
Purpose: To investigate associations between 18F-FDG-PET/CT semiquantitative and radiomic features with pathologic axillary lymph node (ALN) status in stages I–III breast cancer patients. Methods: A search was conducted across MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases. Quality assessment was performed with QUADAS-2 and the radiomics quality score (RQS). Descriptive statistical analysis was performed. Results: Most studies were retrospective cohort studies (27/28) and reported only on semiquantitative features (26/28). Most studies were at high risk of bias in patient selection (22/28) and feature extraction (26/28). Semiquantitative features included maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumour volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). Although associations between tumour semiquantitative features and ALN status were reported, the mean/median reported values of tumour SUVmax (3.2–8.6 vs. 2.4–9.4), MTV (2.7–19.2 vs. 1.9–10.5), and TLG (10.6–59.3 vs. 5.6–29.6) in ALN+ vs. ALN− patients were inconsistent between studies. Fourteen studies reported a significantly higher ALN SUVmax in ALN+ patients. Two studies developed models using tumour radiomic features with high accuracy for predicting ALN metastases (81.2% and 80%) but scored low on the RQS. Conclusions: Feature-based analysis of PET/CT demonstrates potential for predicting pathologic ALN status in breast cancer patients. However, establishing a clinically meaningful relationship requires higher quality evidence. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Application of Nuclear Medicine in Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

27 pages, 3271 KiB  
Systematic Review
Diagnostic Accuracy of Deep Learning Models in Predicting Glioma Molecular Markers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Somayeh Farahani, Marjaneh Hejazi, Sahar Moradizeyveh, Antonio Di Ieva, Emad Fatemizadeh and Sidong Liu
Diagnostics 2025, 15(7), 797; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15070797 - 21 Mar 2025
Viewed by 1103
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Integrating deep learning (DL) into radiomics offers a noninvasive approach to predicting molecular markers in gliomas, a crucial step toward personalized medicine. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of DL models in predicting various glioma molecular markers using MRI. Methods: [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Integrating deep learning (DL) into radiomics offers a noninvasive approach to predicting molecular markers in gliomas, a crucial step toward personalized medicine. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of DL models in predicting various glioma molecular markers using MRI. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Ovid, and Web of Science until 27 February 2024 for studies employing DL algorithms to predict gliomas’ molecular markers from MRI sequences. The publications were assessed for the risk of bias, applicability concerns, and quality using the QUADAS-2 tool and the radiomics quality score (RQS). A bivariate random-effects model estimated pooled sensitivity and specificity, accounting for inter-study heterogeneity. Results: Of 728 articles, 43 were qualified for qualitative analysis, and 30 were included in the meta-analysis. In the validation cohorts, MGMT methylation had a pooled sensitivity of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.66–0.80) and a pooled specificity of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.65–0.82), both with significant heterogeneity (p = 0.00, I2 = 80.90–84.50%). ATRX and TERT mutations had a pooled sensitivity of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.67–0.87) and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.72–0.87) and a pooled specificity of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.78–0.91) and 0.70 (95% CI: 0.61–0.77), respectively. Meta-regression analyses revealed that significant heterogeneity was influenced by data sources, MRI sequences, feature extraction methods, and validation techniques. Conclusions: While the DL models show promising prediction accuracy for glioma molecular markers, variability in the study settings complicates clinical translation. To bridge this gap, future efforts should focus on harmonizing multi-center MRI datasets, incorporating external validation, and promoting open-source studies and data sharing. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Diagnostics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 933 KiB  
Systematic Review
Diagnostic Accuracy of Radiomics in the Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Assessment Using the Methodological Radiomics Score (METRICS)
by María Estefanía Renjifo-Correa, Salvatore Claudio Fanni, Luis A. Bustamante-Cristancho, Maria Emanuela Cuibari, Gayane Aghakhanyan, Lorenzo Faggioni, Emanuele Neri and Dania Cioni
Cancers 2025, 17(5), 803; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17050803 - 26 Feb 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1123
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive and lethal malignancy with increasing incidence and low survival rate, primarily due to the late detection of the disease. Radiomics has demonstrated its utility in recognizing patterns and anomalies not perceptible to the human eye. [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive and lethal malignancy with increasing incidence and low survival rate, primarily due to the late detection of the disease. Radiomics has demonstrated its utility in recognizing patterns and anomalies not perceptible to the human eye. This systematic literature review aims to assess the application of radiomics in the analysis of pancreatic parenchyma images to identify early indicators predictive of PDAC. Methods: A systematic search of original research papers was performed on three databases: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. Two reviewers applied the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and one expert solved conflicts for selecting the articles. After extraction and analysis of the data, there was a quality assessment of these articles using the Methodological Radiomics Score (METRICS) tool. The METRICS assessment was carried out by two raters, and conflicts were solved by a third reviewer. Results: Ten articles for analysis were retrieved. CT scan was the diagnostic imaging used in all the articles. All the studies were retrospective and published between 2019 and 2024. The main objective of the articles was to generate radiomics-based machine learning models able to differentiate pancreatic tumors from healthy tissue. The reported diagnostic performance of the model chosen yielded very high results, with a diagnostic accuracy between 86.5% and 99.2%. Texture and shape features were the most frequently implemented. The METRICS scoring assessment demonstrated that three articles obtained a moderate quality, five a good quality, and, finally, two articles yielded excellent quality. The lack of external validation and available model, code, and data were the major limitations according to the qualitative assessment. Conclusions: There is high heterogeneity in the research question regarding radiomics and pancreatic cancer. The principal limitations of the studies were mainly due to the nature of the trials and the considerable heterogeneity of the radiomic features reported. Nonetheless, the work in this field is promising, and further studies are still required to adopt radiomics in the early detection of PDAC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Multimodality Imaging for More Precise Radiotherapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 7236 KiB  
Article
Addressing Multi-Center Variability in Radiomic Analysis: A Comparative Study of Image Acquisition Methods Across Two 3T MRI Scanners
by Claudia Tocilă-Mătășel, Sorin Marian Dudea and Gheorghe Iana
Diagnostics 2025, 15(4), 485; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15040485 - 17 Feb 2025
Viewed by 634
Abstract
Background: Radiomics has become a valuable tool in medical imaging, but its clinical use is limited by data variability and a lack of reproducibility between centers. This study aims to assess the differences between two scanners and provide guidance on image acquisition [...] Read more.
Background: Radiomics has become a valuable tool in medical imaging, but its clinical use is limited by data variability and a lack of reproducibility between centers. This study aims to assess the differences between two scanners and provide guidance on image acquisition methods to reduce variations between images obtained from different centers. Methods: This study utilized medical images obtained in two different imaging centers, with two different 3T MRI scanners. For each scanner, 3D T2 FLAIR sequences were acquired in two forms: the raw and the clinical practice images typically used in diagnostic workflows. The differences between images were analyzed regarding resolution, SNR, CNR, and radiomic features. To facilitate comparison, bias field correction was applied, and the data were standardized to the same scale using Z-score normalization. Descriptive and inferential statistical methods were used to analyze the data. Results: The results show that there are significant differences between centers. Filtering and zero-padding significantly influence the resolution, SNR, CNR values, and radiomics features. Applying Z-score normalization has resolved variations in features sensitive to scale differences, but features reflecting dispersion and extreme values remain significantly different between scanners. Some feature differences may be resolved by analyzing the raw images in both centers. Conclusions: Variations arise due to different acquisition parameters and the differing quality and sensitivity of the equipment. In multi-center studies, acquiring raw images and then applying standardized post-processing methods across all images can enhance the robustness of results. This approach minimizes technical differences, and preserves the integrity of the information, reflecting a more accurate representation of reality and contributing to more reliable and reproducible findings. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Radiomics in Medical Imaging)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1325 KiB  
Systematic Review
Predicting Response to Treatment and Survival in Advanced Ovarian Cancer Using Machine Learning and Radiomics: A Systematic Review
by Sabrina Piedimonte, Mariam Mohamed, Gabriela Rosa, Brigit Gerstl and Danielle Vicus
Cancers 2025, 17(3), 336; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17030336 - 21 Jan 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1938
Abstract
Background and Objective: Machine learning and radiomics (ML/RM) are gaining interest in ovarian cancer (OC) but only a few studies have used these methods to predict treatment response. The objective of this study was to review the literature on the applications of ML/RM [...] Read more.
Background and Objective: Machine learning and radiomics (ML/RM) are gaining interest in ovarian cancer (OC) but only a few studies have used these methods to predict treatment response. The objective of this study was to review the literature on the applications of ML/RM in OC assessments, specifically focusing on studies describing algorithms to predict treatment response and survival. Methods: This is a systematic review of the published literature from January 1985 to December 2023 on the use of ML/RM in OC An extensive search of electronic library databases was conducted. Two independent reviewers screened the articles initially by title then by full text. Quality was assessed using the MINORS criteria. p-values were generated using the Pearson’s Chi-squared (x2) test to compare the performances of ML/RM models with traditional statistics. Results: Of the 5576 screened articles, 225 studies were included. Between 2021 and 2023, 49 studies were published, highlighting the rapidly growing interest in ML/RM. Median-quality scores using the MINORS scale were similar between studies published between 1985–2021 and 2021–2023 (both 8). Neural Networks (22.6%) and LASSO (15.3%) were the most common ML/RM algorithms in OC. Among these studies, 13 focused specifically on prediction of treatment response using radiomics. A total of 5113 patients were analyzed. The most common algorithms were Random Forest (4/13) followed by Neural Networks (3/13) and Support Vectors (3/13). Radiomic analysis was used to predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in seven studies, with a median AUC of 0.77 (range 0.72–0.93), while the median AUC was 0.82 (range 0.77–0.89) in the six studies assessing the prediction of optimal or complete cytoreduction. Median model accuracy reported in 7/13 studies was 73% (range 66–98%). Additionally, four studies investigated the use of ML/RM for survival prediction for OC. The XGBoost model had 80.9% accuracy in predicting 5-year survival compared to linear regression, which achieved 79% accuracy. The Random Forest model has 93.7% accuracy in predicting 12-month progression-free survival, compared to 82% for linear regression. Conclusions: In conclusion, we found that the use of ML/RM algorithms is becoming a more frequent method to predict responses to treatment of OC. These models should be validated in a prospective multicenter trial prior to integration into clinical use. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 3142 KiB  
Article
Comparison of Resampling Methods and Radiomic Machine Learning Classifiers for Predicting Bone Quality Using Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry
by Mailen Gonzalez, José Manuel Fuertes García, María Belén Zanchetta, Rubén Abdala and José María Massa
Diagnostics 2025, 15(2), 175; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15020175 - 14 Jan 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 963
Abstract
Background/Objectives: This study presents a novel approach, based on a combination of radiomic feature extraction, data resampling techniques, and machine learning algorithms, for the detection of degraded bone structures in Dual X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) images. This comprehensive approach, which addresses the critical [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: This study presents a novel approach, based on a combination of radiomic feature extraction, data resampling techniques, and machine learning algorithms, for the detection of degraded bone structures in Dual X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) images. This comprehensive approach, which addresses the critical aspects of the problem, distinguishes this work from previous studies, improving the performance achieved by the most similar studies. The primary aim is to provide clinicians with an accessible tool for quality bone assessment, which is currently limited. Methods: A dataset of 1531 spine DXA images was automatically segmented and labelled based on Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) values. Radiomic features were extracted using Pyradiomics, and various resampling techniques were employed to address class imbalance. Three machine learning classifiers (Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and XGBoost) were trained and evaluated using standard performance metrics. Results: The SVM classifier outperformed the other classifiers. The highest F-score of 97.5% was achieved using the Grey Level Dependence Matrix and Grey Level Run Length Matrix feature combination with SMOTEENN resampling, which proved to be the most effective resampling technique, while the undersampling method yielded the lowest performance. Conclusions: This research demonstrates the potential of radiomic texture features, resampling techniques, and machine learning methods for classifying DXA images into healthy or degraded bone structures, which potentially leads to improved clinical diagnosis and treatment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Classification of Diseases Using Machine Learning Algorithms)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 446 KiB  
Systematic Review
[18F]FDG PET/CT Radiomics in Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review
by Judicael Hotton, Arnaud Beddok, Abdenasser Moubtakir, Dimitri Papathanassiou and David Morland
Diagnostics 2025, 15(1), 65; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15010065 - 30 Dec 2024
Viewed by 1242
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Cervical cancer is a significant global health concern, with high incidence and mortality rates, especially in less-developed regions. [18F]FDG PET/CT is now indicated at various stages of management, but its analysis is essentially based on SUVmax, a measure of [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Cervical cancer is a significant global health concern, with high incidence and mortality rates, especially in less-developed regions. [18F]FDG PET/CT is now indicated at various stages of management, but its analysis is essentially based on SUVmax, a measure of [18F]FDG uptake. Radiomics, by extracting a multitude of parameters, promises to improve the diagnostic and prognostic performance of the examination. However, studies remain heterogeneous, both in terms of patient numbers and methods, so a synthesis is needed. Methods: This systematic review was conducted following PRISMA-P guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024584123). Eligible studies on PET/CT radiomics in cervical cancer were identified through PubMed and Scopus and assessed for quality using the Radiomics Quality Score (RQS v2.0), with data extraction focusing on study design, population characteristics, radiomic methods, and model performances. Results: The review identified 22 studies on radiomics in cervical cancer, 19 of which focused specifically on locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) and assessed various clinical outcomes, such as survival, relapse, treatment response, and lymph node involvement prediction. They reported significant associations between prognostic indicators and radiomic features, indicating the potential of radiomics to improve the predictive accuracy for patient outcomes in LACC; however, the overall quality of the studies was relatively moderate, with a median RQS of 12/36. Conclusions: While radiomic analysis in cervical cancer presents promising opportunities for survival prediction and personalized care, further well-designed studies are essential to provide stronger evidence for its clinical utility. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Medical Imaging and Theranostics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1823 KiB  
Article
Postoperative Vision-Related Quality of Life After Sphenoid Wing Meningioma Surgery: Impact of Radiomic Shape Features and Age
by Alim Emre Basaran, Martin Vychopen, Clemens Seidel, Alonso Barrantes-Freer, Felix Arlt, Erdem Güresir and Johannes Wach
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(1), 40; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14010040 - 25 Dec 2024
Viewed by 1096
Abstract
Background: Sphenoid wing meningiomas (SWM) frequently compress structures of the optic pathway, resulting in significant visual dysfunction characterized by vision loss and visual field deficits, which profoundly impact patients’ quality of life (QoL), daily activities, and independence. The objective of this study was [...] Read more.
Background: Sphenoid wing meningiomas (SWM) frequently compress structures of the optic pathway, resulting in significant visual dysfunction characterized by vision loss and visual field deficits, which profoundly impact patients’ quality of life (QoL), daily activities, and independence. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of SWM surgery on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) regarding postoperative visual function. Methods: The Visual Function Score Questionnaire (VFQ-25) is a validated tool designed to assess the impact of visual impairment on quality of life. The questionnaire was distributed to a previously published study population in which shape radiomics were correlated with new cranial nerve deficits after SWM surgery. Results: A total of 42 patients (42/74; 56.8%) responded to the questionnaire. Of the 42 patients, 30 were female (71%) and 12 were male (29%). The multivariable analysis demonstrated that lower sphericity reflecting irregular SWM shape was associated with poorer VFQ-25 (OR: 6.8, 95% CI: 1.141.8, p = 0.039), while age was associated with lower VFQ-25 (OR: 27, 95% CI: 2.7−272.93, p = 0.005), too. Analysis of the subcategories of the VFQ-25 revealed significantly reduced general vision (p = 0.045), social functioning (p = 0.045), and peripheral vision (p = 0.017) in those with SWM with low sphericity. Conclusions: The study highlights that SWM surgery impacts postoperative visual function, with age and irregular SWM shape being associated with poorer postoperative VFQ-25 scores. VFQ-25 is a feasible tool to assess vision outcome in SWM surgery and has clinical potential for longitudinal follow-up evaluations. Irregular SWM shape should be considered during preoperative treatment planning and patient consultation regarding functional outcome. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neuro-Oncology: Diagnosis and Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 468 KiB  
Systematic Review
Quality Assessment of MRI-Radiomics-Based Machine Learning Methods in Classification of Brain Tumors: Systematic Review
by Shailesh S. Nayak, Saikiran Pendem, Girish R. Menon, Niranjana Sampathila and Prakashini Koteshwar
Diagnostics 2024, 14(23), 2741; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14232741 - 5 Dec 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1714
Abstract
Background: Brain tumors present a complex challenge in clinical oncology, where precise diagnosis and classification are pivotal for effective treatment planning. Radiomics, a burgeoning field in neuro-oncology, involves extracting and analyzing numerous quantitative features from medical images. This approach captures subtle spatial and [...] Read more.
Background: Brain tumors present a complex challenge in clinical oncology, where precise diagnosis and classification are pivotal for effective treatment planning. Radiomics, a burgeoning field in neuro-oncology, involves extracting and analyzing numerous quantitative features from medical images. This approach captures subtle spatial and textural information imperceptible to the human eye. However, implementation in clinical practice is still distant, and concerns have been raised regarding the methodological quality of radiomic studies. Methodology: A systematic literature search was performed to identify original articles focused on the use of radiomics for brain tumors from 2015 based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The radiomic features train machine learning models for glioma classification, and data are split into training and testing subsets to validate the model accuracy, reliability, and generalizability. The present study systematically reviews the status of radiomic studies concerning brain tumors, also using the radiomics quality score (RQS) to assess the quality of the methodology used in each study. Results: A systematic search of PubMed identified 300 articles, with 18 studies meeting the inclusion criteria for qualitative synthesis. These studies collectively demonstrate the potential of radiomics-based machine learning models in accurately distinguishing between glioma subtypes and grades. Various imaging modalities, including MRI, PET/CT, and advanced techniques like ASL and DTI, were utilized to extract radiomic features for analysis. Machine learning algorithms such as deep learning networks, support vector machines, random forests, and logistic regression were applied to develop predictive models. Conclusions: The present study indicates high accuracies in glioma classification, outperforming traditional imaging methods and inexperienced radiologists in some cases. Further validation and standardization efforts are warranted to facilitate the clinical integration of radiomics into routine practice, ultimately enhancing glioma management and patient outcomes. Open science practices: Machine learning using MRI radiomic features provides a simple, noninvasive, and cost-effective method for glioma classification, enhancing transparency, reproducibility, and collaboration within the scientific community. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research Update on Magnetic Resonance Imaging)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

16 pages, 349 KiB  
Systematic Review
Coronary CT Angiography Radiomics for Identifying Coronary Artery Plaque Vulnerability: A Systematic Review
by Cian P. Murray, Hugo C. Temperley, Niall J. O’Sullivan, Andrew P. Kenny and Ross Murphy
Hearts 2024, 5(4), 584-599; https://doi.org/10.3390/hearts5040045 - 25 Nov 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1636
Abstract
Background/objectives: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a major global health issue primarily caused by the rupture or erosion of vulnerable coronary plaques. Non-invasive identification of these plaques through coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) can be improved with radiomics, which extracts and analyses quantitative [...] Read more.
Background/objectives: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a major global health issue primarily caused by the rupture or erosion of vulnerable coronary plaques. Non-invasive identification of these plaques through coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) can be improved with radiomics, which extracts and analyses quantitative features from medical images. This systematic review aims to comprehensively evaluate the literature surrounding the role of radiomics in assessing coronary plaques via CCTA. Methods: A systematic search of Medline, EMBASE, and Web of Science was conducted up to July 2024. Nine studies met the inclusion criteria, and their methodological quality was assessed using the radiomic quality score (RQS) and the QUADAS-2 tool. Results: All studies that evaluated radiomic models for plaque vulnerability reported area under the curve (AUC) values exceeding 0.7, indicating at least modest diagnostic performance. In the four studies that made direct comparisons, radiomic models consistently outperformed conventional CCTA markers. However, RQS scores ranged from 2.7% to 41.7%, reflecting variability in study quality and underscoring the need for more robust validation. Conclusions: Radiomics has the potential to enhance CCTA-based identification of vulnerable coronary plaques, offering a promising non-invasive approach to predicting major adverse cardiovascular events. However, the current body of research is limited by the lack of external validation, reliance on small, single-centre retrospective studies, and methodological inconsistencies, which impact the generalisability and reproducibility of findings. Future research should prioritise prospective, multi-centre studies with standardised protocols and rigorous validation frameworks to effectively incorporate radiomics into clinical practice. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

33 pages, 9381 KiB  
Review
Decoding Radiomics: A Step-by-Step Guide to Machine Learning Workflow in Hand-Crafted and Deep Learning Radiomics Studies
by Maurizio Cè, Marius Dumitru Chiriac, Andrea Cozzi, Laura Macrì, Francesca Lucrezia Rabaiotti, Giovanni Irmici, Deborah Fazzini, Gianpaolo Carrafiello and Michaela Cellina
Diagnostics 2024, 14(22), 2473; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14222473 - 5 Nov 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 4355
Abstract
Although radiomics research has experienced rapid growth in recent years, with numerous studies dedicated to the automated extraction of diagnostic and prognostic information from various imaging modalities, such as CT, PET, and MRI, only a small fraction of these findings has successfully transitioned [...] Read more.
Although radiomics research has experienced rapid growth in recent years, with numerous studies dedicated to the automated extraction of diagnostic and prognostic information from various imaging modalities, such as CT, PET, and MRI, only a small fraction of these findings has successfully transitioned into clinical practice. This gap is primarily due to the significant methodological challenges involved in radiomics research, which emphasize the need for a rigorous evaluation of study quality. While many technical aspects may lie outside the expertise of most radiologists, having a foundational knowledge is essential for evaluating the quality of radiomics workflows and contributing, together with data scientists, to the development of models with a real-world clinical impact. This review is designed for the new generation of radiologists, who may not have specialized training in machine learning or radiomics, but will inevitably play a role in this evolving field. The paper has two primary objectives: first, to provide a clear, systematic guide to radiomics study pipeline, including study design, image preprocessing, feature selection, model training and validation, and performance evaluation. Furthermore, given the critical importance of evaluating the robustness of radiomics studies, this review offers a step-by-step guide to the application of the METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS, 2024)—a newly proposed tool for assessing the quality of radiomics studies. This roadmap aims to support researchers and reviewers alike, regardless of their machine learning expertise, in utilizing this tool for effective study evaluation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Machine Learning in Radiomics: Opportunities and Challenges)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 1762 KiB  
Systematic Review
The Role of Radiomics in the Prediction of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in the PI-RADS v2 and v2.1 Era: A Systematic Review
by Andreu Antolin, Nuria Roson, Richard Mast, Javier Arce, Ramon Almodovar, Roger Cortada, Almudena Maceda, Manuel Escobar, Enrique Trilla and Juan Morote
Cancers 2024, 16(17), 2951; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16172951 - 24 Aug 2024
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2340
Abstract
Early detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) has substantially improved with the latest PI-RADS versions. However, there is still an overdiagnosis of indolent lesions (iPCa), and radiomics has emerged as a potential solution. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate [...] Read more.
Early detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) has substantially improved with the latest PI-RADS versions. However, there is still an overdiagnosis of indolent lesions (iPCa), and radiomics has emerged as a potential solution. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the role of handcrafted and deep radiomics in differentiating lesions with csPCa from those with iPCa and benign lesions on prostate MRI assessed with PI-RADS v2 and/or 2.1. The literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases to select relevant studies. Quality assessment was carried out with Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2), Radiomic Quality Score (RQS), and Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM) tools. A total of 14 studies were deemed as relevant from 411 publications. The results highlighted a good performance of handcrafted and deep radiomics methods for csPCa detection, but without significant differences compared to radiologists (PI-RADS) in the few studies in which it was assessed. Moreover, heterogeneity and restrictions were found in the studies and quality analysis, which might induce bias. Future studies should tackle these problems to encourage clinical applicability. Prospective studies and comparison with radiologists (PI-RADS) are needed to better understand its potential. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue MRI in Prostate Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 1918 KiB  
Article
Deciphering the Prognostic Efficacy of MRI Radiomics in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis
by Chih-Keng Wang, Ting-Wei Wang, Chia-Fung Lu, Yu-Te Wu and Man-Wei Hua
Diagnostics 2024, 14(9), 924; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14090924 - 29 Apr 2024
Viewed by 1832
Abstract
This meta-analysis investigates the prognostic value of MRI-based radiomics in nasopharyngeal carcinoma treatment outcomes, specifically focusing on overall survival (OS) variability. The study protocol was registered with INPLASY (INPLASY202420101). Initially, a systematic review identified 15 relevant studies involving 6243 patients through a comprehensive [...] Read more.
This meta-analysis investigates the prognostic value of MRI-based radiomics in nasopharyngeal carcinoma treatment outcomes, specifically focusing on overall survival (OS) variability. The study protocol was registered with INPLASY (INPLASY202420101). Initially, a systematic review identified 15 relevant studies involving 6243 patients through a comprehensive search across PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, adhering to PRISMA guidelines. The methodological quality was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool and the Radiomics Quality Score (RQS), highlighting a low risk of bias in most domains. Our analysis revealed a significant average concordance index (c-index) of 72% across studies, indicating the potential of radiomics in clinical prognostication. However, moderate heterogeneity was observed, particularly in OS predictions. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression identified validation methods and radiomics software as significant heterogeneity moderators. Notably, the number of features in the prognosis model correlated positively with its performance. These findings suggest radiomics’ promising role in enhancing cancer treatment strategies, though the observed heterogeneity and potential biases call for cautious interpretation and standardization in future research. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Diagnostics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1229 KiB  
Systematic Review
Advancing Pediatric Sarcomas through Radiomics: A Systematic Review and Prospective Assessment Using Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) and Methodological Radiomics Score (METRICS)
by Gayane Aghakhanyan, Tommaso Filidei, Maria Febi, Salvatore C. Fanni, Andrea Marciano, Roberto Francischello, Francesca Pia Caputo, Lorenzo Tumminello, Dania Cioni, Emanuele Neri and Duccio Volterrani
Diagnostics 2024, 14(8), 832; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14080832 - 17 Apr 2024
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1951
Abstract
Pediatric sarcomas, rare malignancies of mesenchymal origin, pose diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. In this review, we explore the role of radiomics in reshaping our understanding of pediatric sarcomas, emphasizing methodological considerations and applications such as diagnostics and predictive modeling. A systematic review conducted [...] Read more.
Pediatric sarcomas, rare malignancies of mesenchymal origin, pose diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. In this review, we explore the role of radiomics in reshaping our understanding of pediatric sarcomas, emphasizing methodological considerations and applications such as diagnostics and predictive modeling. A systematic review conducted up to November 2023 identified 72 papers on radiomics analysis in pediatric sarcoma from PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Knowledge, and Scopus. Following inclusion and exclusion criteria, 10 reports were included in this review. The studies, predominantly retrospective, focus on Ewing sarcoma and osteosarcoma, utilizing diverse imaging modalities, including CT, MRI, PET/CT, and PET/MRI. Manual segmentation is common, with a median of 35 features extracted. Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) and Methodological Radiomics Score (METRICS) assessments reveal a consistent emphasis on non-radiomic features, validation criteria, and improved methodological rigor in recent publications. Diagnostic applications dominate, with innovative studies exploring prognostic and treatment response aspects. Challenges include feature heterogeneity and sample size variations. The evolving landscape underscores the need for standardized methodologies. Despite challenges, the diagnostic and predictive potential of radiomics in pediatric oncology is evident, paving the way for precision medicine advancements. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnostic and Clinical Application of Magnetic Resonance Imaging)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop