Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (12)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = provisional fixed dental prosthesis

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
29 pages, 2309 KiB  
Systematic Review
The Influence of Printing Orientation on the Properties of 3D-Printed Polymeric Provisional Dental Restorations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Firas K. Alqarawi
J. Funct. Biomater. 2025, 16(8), 278; https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb16080278 - 31 Jul 2025
Viewed by 381
Abstract
Three-dimensional printing is commonly used to fabricate provisional dental restorations. Studies have reported that changes in printing orientation affect the physical and mechanical properties of 3D-printed polymeric provisional restorations; however the findings have been inconsistent. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aims to [...] Read more.
Three-dimensional printing is commonly used to fabricate provisional dental restorations. Studies have reported that changes in printing orientation affect the physical and mechanical properties of 3D-printed polymeric provisional restorations; however the findings have been inconsistent. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aims to analyze the articles evaluating the influence of printing orientation on the physical and mechanical properties of 3D-printed polymeric provisional dental restorations. Recommendations provided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed to structure and compose the review. The PICO (Participant, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) question ordered was: ‘Do 3D-printed provisional dental restorations (P) printed at various orientations (except 0°) (I) exhibit similar physical and mechanical properties (O) when compared to those printed at a 0° orientation (C)?’. An electronic search was conducted on 28 and 29 April 2025, by two independent researchers across four databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) to systematically collect relevant articles published up to March 2025. After removing duplicate articles and applying predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, twenty-one articles were incorporated into this review. Self-designed Performa’s were used to tabulate all relevant information. For the quality analysis, the modified CONSORT scale was utilized. The quantitative analysis was performed on only fifteen out of twenty-one articles. It can be concluded that the printing orientation affects some of the tested properties, which include fracture strength (significantly higher for specimens printed at 0° when compared to 90°), wear resistance (significantly higher for specimens printed at 90° when compared to 0°), microhardness (significantly higher for specimens printed at 90°and 45° when compared to 0°), color stability (high at 0°), and surface roughness (significantly higher for specimens printed at 45° and 90° when compared to 0°). There were varied outcomes in terms of flexural strength and elastic modulus. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Restorative Dentistry Materials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 710 KiB  
Systematic Review
Mechanical Properties of Three-Dimensional Printed Provisional Resin Materials for Crown and Fixed Dental Prosthesis: A Systematic Review
by Saeed J. Alzahrani, Maher S. Hajjaj, Amr Ahmed Azhari, Walaa Magdy Ahmed, Hanin E. Yeslam and Ricardo Marins Carvalho
Bioengineering 2023, 10(6), 663; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10060663 - 31 May 2023
Cited by 36 | Viewed by 5875
Abstract
The emergence of digital dentistry has led to the introduction of various three-dimensional (3D) printing materials in the market, specifically for provisional fixed restoration. This study aimed to undertake a systematic review of the published literature on the Mechanical Properties of 3D- Printed [...] Read more.
The emergence of digital dentistry has led to the introduction of various three-dimensional (3D) printing materials in the market, specifically for provisional fixed restoration. This study aimed to undertake a systematic review of the published literature on the Mechanical Properties of 3D- Printed Provisional Resin Materials for crown and fixed dental prosthesis (FDP). The electronic database on PubMed/Medline was searched for relevant studies. The search retrieved articles that were published from January 2011 to March 2023. The established focus question was: “Do provisional 3D-printed materials have better mechanical properties than conventional or milled provisional materials?”. The systematically extracted data included the researcher’s name(s), publication year, evaluation method, number of samples, types of materials, and study outcome. A total of 19 studies were included in this systematic review. These studies examined different aspects of the mechanical properties of 3D-printed provisional materials. Flexural Strength and Microhardness were the frequently used mechanical testing. Furthermore, 3D-printed provisional restorations showed higher hardness, smoother surfaces, less wear volume loss, and higher wear resistance compared to either milled or conventional, or both. 3D-printed provisional resin materials appear to be a promising option for fabricating provisional crowns and FDPs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Materials for Dentistry and Regenerative Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 4200 KiB  
Article
The Effect of the Digital Manufacturing Technique, Preparation Taper, and Cement Type on the Retention of Aged Anterior Provisional Crowns: An In Vitro Study
by Honey Lunkad, Mohammed E. Sayed, Abdullah Essa Alhazmi, Bandar Alwadani, Ameen Marwei Shafei, Muath Naji Ayoub, Maan Mohammed A. Shabi, Sara Ahmad Mesawa, Basmah Alhassan Abdulfatah, Hatem Alqarni, Saeed M. Alqahtani, Ahmed Alamoudi, Mohammed Salman Almalki, Ankur Jethlia and Saurabh Jain
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(24), 12714; https://doi.org/10.3390/app122412714 - 11 Dec 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3034
Abstract
A well-made provisional fixed prosthesis must present as a preview of the future prosthesis and may also augment the health of the abutments and periodontium. Provisional restorations have been prepared chairside with polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) since time immemorial. CAD/CAM additive and subtractive technologies [...] Read more.
A well-made provisional fixed prosthesis must present as a preview of the future prosthesis and may also augment the health of the abutments and periodontium. Provisional restorations have been prepared chairside with polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) since time immemorial. CAD/CAM additive and subtractive technologies have revolutionized the fabrication of interim restorations in dental clinics. The current literature lacks substantial data about retention of provisional crowns manufactured using Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) additive and subtractive techniques with various temporary cements. This in vitro study aims to assess and compare the retention of temporary/provisional anterior crowns based on the combined effect of different digital manufacturing techniques, preparation tapers, and the temporary cements used for cementation. Two maxillary right central incisor typodont teeth were prepared to receive all-ceramic crowns, one with a 10-degree taper and the other with a 20-degree taper. Forty 3D-printed working models with the 10° taper and forty working models with the 20° taper were prepared to receive the temporary crowns. Forty temporary crowns were 3D-printed and forty crowns were milled (20 from each taper group). Kerr Temp-Bond NE conventional cement and Kerr Temp-Bond clear cement were used for cementation in the two groups. The number of samples per test group was 10. All samples were thermocycled and subjected to a universal testing machine to measure the pull-off force until retention loss (N) under tension with a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min. The pull-off force was highest for group 8, i.e., 3D-printed crowns with a 20° taper and cemented with Kerr Temp-Bond clear cement, followed by groups 6, 7, 4, 5, 3, and 2. Group 1, i.e., milled crowns with 10° taper cemented with Kerr Temp-Bond NE conventional cement, exhibited the lowest pull-off retentive force. The clinical selection of long-term provisional crowns fabricated using 3D-printing technology, prepared with 10° or 20° tapers, and cemented with clear cement, is the most favorable in terms of the retention of provisional crowns. 3D-printed provisional crowns can be used as an alternative to conventional and CAD/CAM-milled crowns for long-term provisionalization. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

33 pages, 2529 KiB  
Review
Marginal Adaptation and Internal Fit of 3D-Printed Provisional Crowns and Fixed Dental Prosthesis Resins Compared to CAD/CAM-Milled and Conventional Provisional Resins: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Mohammed Hussain Dafer Al Wadei, Mohammed E. Sayed, Saurabh Jain, Aparna Aggarwal, Hatem Alqarni, Shilpi Gilra Gupta, Saeed M. Alqahtani, Nasser M. Alahmari, Abdullah Hasan Alshehri, Meena Jain, Abrar A. Ageeli, Saad Saleh AlResayes, Samar Alghamdi, Alhanouf K. Alnajdi and Mafaz M. Gharawi
Coatings 2022, 12(11), 1777; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12111777 - 20 Nov 2022
Cited by 24 | Viewed by 6682
Abstract
The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the marginal fit and internal adaptation of provisional crowns and fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) fabricated using 3D-printing resins and compared them with those fabricated by CAD/CAM (computer-aided designing/computer-aided manufacturing) milling and conventional resins. The [...] Read more.
The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the marginal fit and internal adaptation of provisional crowns and fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) fabricated using 3D-printing resins and compared them with those fabricated by CAD/CAM (computer-aided designing/computer-aided manufacturing) milling and conventional resins. The null hypotheses tested were that there would be no differences in the marginal fit and internal adaptation of 3D-printed provisional crowns and FDP resins when compared to CAD/CAM-milled and conventional provisional resins. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used to construct this systematic review. The focused PICO/PECO (Population, Intervention/Exposure, Comparison, Outcome) question was “Do provisional crowns and FDPs (P) fabricated by 3D-printing (I) have similar marginal adaptation and internal fit (O) when compared to those fabricated by CAD/CAM milling and conventional techniques (C)?”. The protocol used for this systematic review was pre-registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). Electronic databases (e.g., MEDLINE/PubMed and Web of Science (Core Collection)) were systematically searched for indexed English literature published up to June 2022. In the initial electronic search of the selected databases, 519 articles were identified. Duplicates were removed, and screening was performed to select the articles that met the preset inclusion criteria. Sixteen studies were selected for qualitative analysis, but only ten of them provided comparative data and were selected for quantitative analysis. The modified CONSORT scale was used for qualitative analysis, and most of the included studies were rated to be of moderate quality. Based on the findings, it could be concluded that provisional crowns and FDPs fabricated from 3D-printing resins have a superior marginal fit and internal adaptation when compared to CAD/CAM-milled and conventional provisional resins; thus, they can be used as a dependable alternative to other resins. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Surface Modifications and Coatings for Implantable Biomaterials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

40 pages, 4348 KiB  
Systematic Review
Physical and Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed Provisional Crowns and Fixed Dental Prosthesis Resins Compared to CAD/CAM Milled and Conventional Provisional Resins: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Saurabh Jain, Mohammed E. Sayed, Mallika Shetty, Saeed M. Alqahtani, Mohammed Hussain Dafer Al Wadei, Shilpi Gilra Gupta, Ahlam Abdulsalam Ahmed Othman, Abdulkarim Hussain Alshehri, Hatem Alqarni, Abdulaziz Hussain Mobarki, Khalid Motlaq, Haifa F. Bakmani, Asma A. Zain, Abdullah J. Hakami and Moayad F. Sheayria
Polymers 2022, 14(13), 2691; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14132691 - 30 Jun 2022
Cited by 114 | Viewed by 13639
Abstract
Newly introduced provisional crowns and fixed dental prostheses (FDP) materials should exhibit good physical and mechanical properties necessary to serve the purpose of their fabrication. The aim of this systematic literature review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the articles comparing the physical and [...] Read more.
Newly introduced provisional crowns and fixed dental prostheses (FDP) materials should exhibit good physical and mechanical properties necessary to serve the purpose of their fabrication. The aim of this systematic literature review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the articles comparing the physical and mechanical properties of 3D-printed provisional crown and FDP resin materials with CAD/CAM (Computer-Aided Designing/Computer-Aided Manufacturing) milled and conventional provisional resins. Indexed English literature up to April 2022 was systematically searched for articles using the following electronic databases: MEDLINE-PubMed, Web of Science (core collection), Scopus, and the Cochrane library. This systematic review was structured based on the guidelines given by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The focused PICO/PECO (Participant, Intervention/exposure, Comparison, Outcome) question was: ‘Do 3D-printed (P) provisional crowns and FDPs (I) have similar physical and mechanical properties (O) when compared to CAD/CAM milled and other conventionally fabricated ones (C)’. Out of eight hundred and ninety-six titles, which were recognized after a primary search, twenty-five articles were included in the qualitative analysis, and their quality analysis was performed using the modified CONSORT scale. Due to the heterogeneity of the studies, only twelve articles were included for quantitative analysis. Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that 3D-printed provisional crown and FDP resin materials have superior mechanical properties but inferior physical properties compared to CAD/CAM milled and other conventionally fabricated ones. Three-dimensionally printed provisional crowns and FDP materials can be used as an alternative to conventional and CAD/CAM milled long-term provisional materials. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Advancements for Bioactive Biomedical Polymers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 3288 KiB  
Review
PEEK Biomaterial in Long-Term Provisional Implant Restorations: A Review
by Suphachai Suphangul, Dinesh Rokaya, Chatruethai Kanchanasobhana, Pimduen Rungsiyakull and Pisaisit Chaijareenont
J. Funct. Biomater. 2022, 13(2), 33; https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb13020033 - 22 Mar 2022
Cited by 40 | Viewed by 8337
Abstract
Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) has become a useful polymeric biomaterial due to its superior properties and has been increasingly used in dentistry, especially in prosthetic dentistry and dental implantology. Promising applications of PEEK in dentistry are dental implants, temporary abutment, implant-supported provisional crowns, fixed prosthesis, [...] Read more.
Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) has become a useful polymeric biomaterial due to its superior properties and has been increasingly used in dentistry, especially in prosthetic dentistry and dental implantology. Promising applications of PEEK in dentistry are dental implants, temporary abutment, implant-supported provisional crowns, fixed prosthesis, removable denture framework, and finger prosthesis. PEEK as a long-term provisional implant restoration has not been studied much. Hence, this review article aims to review PEEK as a long-term provisional implant restoration for applications focusing on implant dentistry. Articles published in English on PEEK biomaterial for long-term provisional implant restoration were searched in Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, PubMed/MEDLINE, and Scopus. Then, relevant articles were selected and included in this literature review. PEEK presents suitable properties for various implant components in implant dentistry, including temporary and long-term provisional restorations. The modifications of PEEK result in wider applications in clinical dentistry. The PEEK reinforced by 30–50% carbon fibers can be a suitable material for the various implant components in dentistry. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Dental Implants and Biomaterials)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

12 pages, 2574 KiB  
Article
Comparative Analysis of Fracture Resistance between CAD/CAM Materials for Interim Fixed Prosthesis
by Cristian Abad-Coronel, Elena Carrera, Nancy Mena Córdova, Jorge I. Fajardo and Paulina Aliaga
Materials 2021, 14(24), 7791; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14247791 - 16 Dec 2021
Cited by 32 | Viewed by 4706
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the resistance to fracture of interim restorations obtained through additive techniques (3D impressions) and subtractive techniques (milling) using a computer-aided design and manufacture (CAD/CAM) system of a three-unit fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) to [...] Read more.
The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the resistance to fracture of interim restorations obtained through additive techniques (3D impressions) and subtractive techniques (milling) using a computer-aided design and manufacture (CAD/CAM) system of a three-unit fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) to ascertain its clinical importance. (1) Materials and methods: In total, 40 samples were manufactured and divided into two groups (n = 20) using: (1) light-curing micro hybrid resin for temporary crowns and bridges (PriZma 3D Bio Prov, MarketechLabs, São Paulo, Brazil) for the rapid prototyping group (RP) and (2) a polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) CAD/CAM disc (Vipiblock Trilux, VIPI, São Paulo, Brazil) for the computer-assisted milling (CC). The resistance to fracture was determined with a universal testing machine. (2) Results: The strength and the standard deviation for the computer-assisted milling group were higher (1663.57 ± 130.25 N) than the rapid prototyping (RP) group, which had lower values of (1437.74 ± 73.41 N). (3) Conclusions: The provisional restorations from the computer-assisted milling group showed a greater resistance to fracture than the provisional restorations obtained from the rapid prototyping group. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Prospects for Dental Materials in Prosthodontics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 4762 KiB  
Article
Accuracy of the Provisional Prosthesis Scanning Techniqueversus a Conventional Impression Technique on Completely Edentulous Arches
by Chunui Lee, Shavkat Dusmukhamedov, Yi-Qin Fang, Seung-Mi Jeong and Byung-Ho Choi
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(16), 7182; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11167182 - 4 Aug 2021
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2309
Abstract
Purpose: In this study, we aimed to compare the marginal fit of fixed dental restorations fabricated with the provisional prosthesis scanning technique versus a conventional impression technique and to determine the effect of both variables on the accuracy outcome. Materials and Methods: Twelve [...] Read more.
Purpose: In this study, we aimed to compare the marginal fit of fixed dental restorations fabricated with the provisional prosthesis scanning technique versus a conventional impression technique and to determine the effect of both variables on the accuracy outcome. Materials and Methods: Twelve identical polyurethane edentulous maxillary models were equally divided into two groups: control (conventional impression group) and test (provisional prosthesis scanning group). After obtaining the impression using the above-mentioned methods and further preparing the final prosthesis, the passivity of the metal framework prosthesis was checked using a single screw test, i.e., only one screw was fixed on the terminal right abutment, and all others were empty. The marginal fit of the final prosthetic frameworks screwed onto the implants on the terminal left abutment was measured at the terminal right sight by periapical radiographs obtained immediately after metal framework placements in both groups. The medians derived from the two groups were compared using the Mann–Whitney test. In all tests, a p-value < 0.05 indicated statistical significance. Results: In the provisional prosthesis scanning group, the median marginal fit discrepancy was 170 µm (range 120–190). In the conventional impression group, the median marginal fit discrepancy was 1080 µm (range 1040–1100). There was a significant difference in the implant-framework marginal gap fit discrepancy between these two groups. Conclusion: Prostheses fabricated with the provisional prosthesis scanning technique are significantly more accurate than those fabricated with conventional impression techniques. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Computer Technologies in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 1265 KiB  
Article
Effect of Fabrication Method on Fracture Strength of Provisional Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses
by Kelly M. Suralik, Jie Sun, Chia-Yu Chen and Sang J. Lee
Prosthesis 2020, 2(4), 325-332; https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis2040030 - 4 Nov 2020
Cited by 20 | Viewed by 5081
Abstract
There has been an increase in utilizing 3D printers in dental restorations. The purpose of the study is to compare mechanical properties of 3D-printed prostheses to those of self-cured and/or computer-aided design-computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) restorations. A metal master typodont was prepared for the [...] Read more.
There has been an increase in utilizing 3D printers in dental restorations. The purpose of the study is to compare mechanical properties of 3D-printed prostheses to those of self-cured and/or computer-aided design-computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) restorations. A metal master typodont was prepared for the mandibular left sextant with implant analogs embedded at the first premolar and first molar positions with a missing second premolar. Three-unit provisional fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) was designed utilizing the 3Shape tooth library and forty-five uniform specimens were fabricated with different materials: self-cured poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) (N = 15), milled PMMA CAD-CAM blocks (N = 15) and 3D-printed resin (N = 15). All specimens were tested using an Instron machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min by an axial load on the occlusal surface of the second premolar pontic site. Statistical analysis was completed with Shapiro-Wilk, ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc tests. Mean fracture force was 300.61 N, 294.64 N and 408.49 N for self-cured PMMA, milled PMMA and 3D-printed resin, respectively. Mean force at FDP fracture of 3D-printed resin was significantly greater than the mean fracture force of either self-cured (p = 0.016, 95% CI [17.86, 197.91]) or milled (p = 0.010, 95% CI [23.83, 203.88]) PMMA. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 5940 KiB  
Article
Flexural Strength of 3D-Printing Resin Materials for Provisional Fixed Dental Prostheses
by Sang-Mo Park, Ji-Man Park, Seong-Kyun Kim, Seong-Joo Heo and Jai-Young Koak
Materials 2020, 13(18), 3970; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13183970 - 8 Sep 2020
Cited by 109 | Viewed by 9351
Abstract
The clinical application of 3D-printed provisional restorations is increasing due to expansion of intraoral scanners, easy dental computer-aided design (CAD) software, and improved 3D printing speed. This study compared flexural strength of 3D-printed three-unit fixed dental prostheses with that of conventionally fabricated and [...] Read more.
The clinical application of 3D-printed provisional restorations is increasing due to expansion of intraoral scanners, easy dental computer-aided design (CAD) software, and improved 3D printing speed. This study compared flexural strength of 3D-printed three-unit fixed dental prostheses with that of conventionally fabricated and milled restorations. A metal jig of two abutments and pontic space and an indenter for flexural strength measurement were fabricated. A three-unit fixed dental prosthesis was designed and manufactured using three additive manufacturing technologies, with subtractive manufacturing and a conventional method as controls. Digital light processing (DLP) group specimens were prepared from a polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA)-based resin and printed with a DLP printer. Stereolithography (SLA) group specimens were prepared from PMMA-based resin and printed with an SLA printer, and fused deposition modeling (FDM) group specimens were from a polylactic acid-based resin and printed with an FDM printer. Flexural strength was investigated using a universal testing machine, and the results were statistically analyzed. DLP and SLA groups had significantly higher flexural strength than the conventional group (p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed in flexural strength between DLP and SLA groups. The FDM group showed only dents but no fracture. The results of this study suggest that provisional restorations fabricated by DLP and SLA technologies provide adequate flexural strength for dental use. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Surface Modifications and Coatings for Bioactive Implants)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 11141 KiB  
Case Report
Full Digital Workflow for the Treatment of an Edentulous Patient with Guided Surgery, Immediate Loading and 3D-Printed Hybrid Prosthesis: The BARI Technique 2.0. A Case Report
by Pietro Venezia, Ferruccio Torsello, Vincenzo Santomauro, Vittorio Dibello and Raffaele Cavalcanti
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16(24), 5160; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16245160 - 17 Dec 2019
Cited by 38 | Viewed by 11637
Abstract
Purpose: To describe a technique intended to transfer of the intermaxillary and occlusal relationships in a fully digital environment from a complete denture to an implant-supported 3D-printed hybrid prosthesis (an acrylic resin complete fixed dental prosthesis supported by implants). Methods: In edentulous cases, [...] Read more.
Purpose: To describe a technique intended to transfer of the intermaxillary and occlusal relationships in a fully digital environment from a complete denture to an implant-supported 3D-printed hybrid prosthesis (an acrylic resin complete fixed dental prosthesis supported by implants). Methods: In edentulous cases, the physiological mandibular position should be determined before the immediate loading procedures. In some cases, the use of interim removable prostheses for a few weeks could be useful to test the new occlusion in centric relation and to verify the prosthetic project. When the correct intermaxillary relationships are achieved, it is difficult to transfer them from the provisional to the final prostheses, as impressions or scans of edentulous arches do not have reference points for intermaxillary records. This paper presents a complex case and the technique used to transfer information from a complete denture to an implant-supported prosthesis with a digital workflow. A prosthetic stent has been used to scan the edentulous mandibular arch and to record the intermaxillary relation. Results: The delivery of the hybrid implant-supported prostheses was carried out with no problems and minimal occlusal adjustments. The patient was extremely satisfied with the treatment and the situation remained stable at the 1-year follow up. Conclusions: The approach described in the present article predictably maintains prosthetic information and allows the delivery of a final implant-supported restoration with the same occlusal relationship as the one tested with the provisional diagnostic dentures. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Digital Dentistry for Oral Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 2355 KiB  
Case Report
Esthetic Rehabilitation of Maxillary Anterior Teeth, Including an Immediate Provisionalization with an Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prosthesis
by Kyung Chul Oh, Jeongwon Paik and Jee-Hwan Kim
J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8(4), 428; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8040428 - 28 Mar 2019
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 7052
Abstract
This report describes the case of a patient who required rehabilitation of their maxillary anterior teeth following a traumatic injury through a physical altercation. The decision was made to extract the maxillary central incisors and maxillary right lateral incisor, perform immediate implantation on [...] Read more.
This report describes the case of a patient who required rehabilitation of their maxillary anterior teeth following a traumatic injury through a physical altercation. The decision was made to extract the maxillary central incisors and maxillary right lateral incisor, perform immediate implantation on the maxillary right lateral incisor and left central incisor areas, and place a three-unit immediate provisional restoration. Predesigned virtual teeth enabled efficient fabrication of the immediate provisional restoration following the implant placement. After a sufficient healing period with periodic check-ups, final impressions were made using a digital approach, with meticulous care taken to preserve the gingival architecture around the sites of rehabilitation. Thus, the custom abutments and definitive restoration were placed without eliciting an uncomfortable feeling in the patient. Both esthetic and functional outcomes were satisfactory. Reduced soft tissue volume around the implant restoration was observed, primarily within the two months post-extraction/implantation, based on superimposition of the serial scan data. Soft tissue volume changes in the present case suggest the need for controlled clinical studies of three-dimensional changes of gingival contours after extraction and/or implantation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Implant Dentistry—Trends, Challenges and Innovations)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop