Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (12)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = primary ACL repair

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
15 pages, 1052 KB  
Systematic Review
Effects of Transcranial Neuromodulation on Rehabilitation Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
by Juan Vicente-Mampel, Mariola Belda-Antolí, Eloy Jaenada-Carrilero, Andrés Pascual-Leone, Luís Baraja-Vegas, Nicolás Pascual-Leone, Javier Ferrer-Torregrosa, Francisco J. Falaguera-Vera, Álvaro Pascual-Leone and José María Tormos-Muñoz
Biomedicines 2025, 13(12), 3068; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13123068 - 12 Dec 2025
Viewed by 516
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries frequently lead to long-term quadriceps impairments despite surgical repair. There is growing evidence that these deficits are caused in part by alterations in the central nervous system. Thus, transcranial neuromodulation (TNM) could be valuable in ACL [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries frequently lead to long-term quadriceps impairments despite surgical repair. There is growing evidence that these deficits are caused in part by alterations in the central nervous system. Thus, transcranial neuromodulation (TNM) could be valuable in ACL rehabilitation. To systematically review randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effects of TNM on neurophysiological, functional, and safety outcomes in patients with ACL injury or reconstruction. Methods: We conducted searches on PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane. We considered all original studies evaluating TNM, including transcranial current stimulation (tCS) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), in patients with ACL reconstruction or injury. Measures of corticospinal excitability, safety, balance, and muscle strength were assessed. We employed the Cochrane RoB 2 method to assess the risk of bias. Results: Seven studies comprising 129 participants (64 TNM, 65 controls) were included. Most studies applied transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the primary motor cortex contralateral to the ACL injury in conjunction with physical rehabilitation. Single-session protocols demonstrated minimal effects, whereas repeated sessions resulted in improvements in corticospinal excitability, quadriceps strength, and balance. No serious adverse events were reported; minor effects included transient headache or scalp tingling. The risk of bias was assessed as low to moderate across the studies. Conclusions: TNM appears to be safe and may enhance functional recovery in individuals with ACL injuries when administered in multiple sessions alongside standard rehabilitation. Further high-quality trials are necessary to determine optimal protocols and long-term outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Neurobiology and Clinical Neuroscience)
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 878 KB  
Study Protocol
Gait Analysis After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery Comparing Primary Repair and Reconstruction Techniques
by Filip Hušek, Jiří Vitvar, Roman Mizera, Zdeněk Horák and Lukáš Čapek
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(14), 5026; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14145026 - 16 Jul 2025
Viewed by 1901
Abstract
Background: ACL graft reconstruction is considered the gold standard for ACL injury treatment. Recently developed primary repair techniques such as InternalBrace ligament augmentation (Arthrex©) look like promising alternatives. The aim of our study is to compare functional results of two different surgical [...] Read more.
Background: ACL graft reconstruction is considered the gold standard for ACL injury treatment. Recently developed primary repair techniques such as InternalBrace ligament augmentation (Arthrex©) look like promising alternatives. The aim of our study is to compare functional results of two different surgical techniques using a gait analysis. Methods: A total of 42 patients who underwent surgical treatment for ACL rupture were included in this study. The first group was represented by patients who were surgically treated with ACL reconstruction. The second group included patients with acute ACL injury, who underwent primary repair with InternalBrace augmentation. Gait data were measured in the Human Motion Analysis Lab at our institution. The time interval for data collection was 6 weeks after surgery and 6 months after surgery. Results: There was no significant improvement in maximal and peak flexion for both group 1 and group 2 in the 6-week and 6-month intervals. Also, no significant improvement of maximal extension was found in group 1. In contrast, the study showed a reduction in maximal extension for group 2 in the 6-week and 6-month intervals. When comparing peak extension for the graft or InternalBrace techniques, no significant difference was found between both groups in the 6-week evaluation. However, results differed significantly in the 6-month evaluation. Conclusions: Considering the faster gain of extension, less invasiveness of the procedure, and shorter operating time, primary repair with InternalBrace augmentation seems to be a suitable option for treatment of proximal avulsions and Sherman I ACL ruptures. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Orthopedics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 4019 KB  
Article
Extracellular Vesicles from Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Improve Ligament–Bone Integration After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Primary Repair in Rabbit
by Andre Yanuar, Hasrayati Agustina, Radiana Dhewayani Antarianto, Nucki Nursjamsi Hidajat, Andi Isra Mahyuddin, Ismail Hadisoebroto Dilogo, Nicolaas Cyrillus Budhiparama and Nur Atik
Biomolecules 2025, 15(3), 396; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15030396 - 10 Mar 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2382
Abstract
Backgrounds: In this research, we want to find out whether extracellular vesicles (EVs) from adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) can improve ligament–bone integration after primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) repair by performing immunological and biomechanical tests. Methods: All of the rabbits underwent ACL [...] Read more.
Backgrounds: In this research, we want to find out whether extracellular vesicles (EVs) from adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) can improve ligament–bone integration after primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) repair by performing immunological and biomechanical tests. Methods: All of the rabbits underwent ACL resection at the proximal attachment to the femur bone, and then were divided into four groups. We performed an ELISA examination from the tissue at the bone–ligament interface of iNOS, CD206, MMP-3, and TIMP-1 to evaluate their levels at the inflammatory stage at the end of the first week. Immunoexpression of type I and III collagen and failure load biomechanical tests were performed at the end of the sixth week. Result: The group that underwent ACL repair with EVs augmentation had significantly higher levels of CD206, significantly lower MMP-3 levels, and significantly higher TIMP-1 levels in the first week. The iNOS levels in the group that underwent ACL repair with EVs augmentation were significantly different compared to the control group that did not receive any. The number of type I collagen fibers and the failure load levels in the group that underwent ACL repair with EVs augmentation were significantly higher. Conclusions: EVs from adipose-derived MSCs can improve the outcome of primary ACL repair in rabbits by regulating the inflammatory process during the healing period. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Biology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 6812 KB  
Article
Polycaprolactone-Based Fibrous Scaffolds Reinforced with Cellulose Nanocrystals for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair
by Joana M. Rocha, Rui P. C. L. Sousa, Diogo Sousa, Shafagh D. Tohidi, Artur Ribeiro, Raul Fangueiro and Diana P. Ferreira
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(5), 2301; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15052301 - 21 Feb 2025
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2946
Abstract
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries pose significant challenges, driving the need for innovative repair strategies. Tissue engineering (TE) has emerged as a promising field for ACL injuries. Wet spinning is a filament production technique that enables precise control over filament alignment, diameter, and [...] Read more.
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries pose significant challenges, driving the need for innovative repair strategies. Tissue engineering (TE) has emerged as a promising field for ACL injuries. Wet spinning is a filament production technique that enables precise control over filament alignment, diameter, and porosity, making it suitable for developing new scaffolds for ACL injuries. This study develops fibrous scaffolds using wet spinning of polycaprolactone (PCL) reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) to enhance mechanical properties. Wet spinning was employed to fabricate fibrous scaffolds, utilizing PCL as the primary polymer due to its favorable biocompatibility and degradability. An automated collector was developed and optimized, which allowed the stretching of the PCL filaments to diameters as low as 30 µm. Several filaments were explored and characterized using SEM, TGA, and mechanical tests. The optimized PCL/CNC filaments were used to develop 3D braided structures that mimic ACL structure. The combination of wet-spun PCL/CNC filaments (with an optimized stirring method) and the braiding procedure allowed for fully biocompatible scaffolds that mimic both the structure and the mechanical properties of native ACL. Cytotoxicity and biocompatibility tests showed cell viability and proliferation values above 99% and 81%, respectively. These findings underscore the potential of CNC-reinforced PCL scaffolds as promising candidates for ACL repair, laying the groundwork for future biomedical applications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Functional Textiles: Recent Progress and Future Directions)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1636 KB  
Article
Influence of Extra-Articular Augmentation on Clinical Outcomes and Survival in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Pseudorandomized Study
by Antonio Maestro, Nicolás Rodríguez, Iván Pipa, Carmen Toyos, Lucía Lanuza, Filipe Machado, César Castaño and Santiago Maestro
Medicina 2025, 61(1), 116; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61010116 - 14 Jan 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2043
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Up to 27% of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction cases result in a residual positive pivot shift sign, indicating anteroposterior and rotational instability. This instability can compromise returning to sports and increase the risk of further injuries. The biomechanical [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Up to 27% of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction cases result in a residual positive pivot shift sign, indicating anteroposterior and rotational instability. This instability can compromise returning to sports and increase the risk of further injuries. The biomechanical role of the anterolateral ligament (ALL) in controlling internal knee rotation is well known. However, there are no clinical trials comparing isolated ACL repairs to those combined with ALL reconstruction. Our objective is to compare the results of these techniques, with a primary focus on assessing knee stability and graft survival, to provide evidence for optimizing surgical approaches, particularly for athletes and physically active individuals. Materials and Methods: An observational study using paired score matching as a method of pseudo-randomization was conducted. Subjects were divided into an ACL group and an ACL+ALL group. Demographic and clinical variables were collected, as well as those related to complications and survival. Results: A total of 236 patients were included, which was reduced to 74 ACL and 37 ACL+ALL after pseudo-randomization, resulting in preoperatively comparable groups. During follow-up, differences in favor of ALL reinforcement were found on the pivot shift test (p = 0.007). No differences were found with regard to the Lachman test (p = 0.201), the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) knee score (p = 0.169), the IKDC subjective score (p = 0.095), intensity of pain (p = 0.928), or complications (p = 0.529). Nor were differences found in the limb symmetry index; the single hop test (p = 0.710); the triple hop test (p = 0.653); the crossover hop test (p = 0.682); the 6 meter timed hop test (p = 0.360); the normalized Y-balance test (YBT) (p = 0.459 anterior; p = 0.898 posterolateral; and p = 0.211 posteromedial directions); or the limb symmetry index of the composite YBT (p = 0.488). There were no differences either with respect to return to sports practice (p = 0.723) or survival (p = 0.798). Conclusions: Patients treated by means of the ACL+ALL technique obtained higher rotational stability, as measured by the pivot shift test, than those subjected to an isolated ACL repair. No differences were found with respect to Lachman test, complications, IKDC, pain, or survival. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Sports Medicine and Sports Traumatology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 405 KB  
Article
Prolonged Physiotherapy after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Does Not Improve Muscular Strength and Function
by Marc Dauty, Emmanuel Le Mercier, Pierre Menu, Jérôme Grondin, Thomas Hirardot, Pauline Daley and Alban Fouasson-Chailloux
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(9), 2519; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13092519 - 25 Apr 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2105
Abstract
Background: After the rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), surgery is proposed in the case of knee instability or for athletes who want to return to a pivotal and/or contact sport. The current trend is to extend physiotherapy sessions until a patient’s [...] Read more.
Background: After the rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), surgery is proposed in the case of knee instability or for athletes who want to return to a pivotal and/or contact sport. The current trend is to extend physiotherapy sessions until a patient’s return to sport. We aimed to assess the interest in prolonging the physiotherapy sessions up to 4 postoperative months to restore muscle knee strength and function. Methods: From a historical cohort, 470 patients (24.3 ± 8.7 years) were included; 312 (66%) were males. They all had undergone a primary ACL reconstruction with a hamstring procedure. The number of physiotherapy sessions was established at 4 postoperative months. The main study parameters to assess the benefit of prolonged physiotherapy were the isokinetic limb symmetry index (LSI) for the quadriceps and the hamstrings as well as the Lysholm score. Results: At 4 postoperative months, 148 patients (31.4%) still had physiotherapy sessions. This group had performed 49 ± 14 physiotherapy sessions at the time of evaluation compared to 33 ± 9 sessions performed by the group that stopped physiotherapy at 3 months post-ACL reconstruction. The isokinetic knee LSI and the Lysholm score were not different between the two groups. Continued physiotherapy sessions were associated with female gender, previous high sport level, meniscal repair, lateral tenodesis and outpatient rehabilitation at the beginning of the rehabilitation management, while knee pain complications were not associated. Conclusions: No significant correlation was found between the number of physiotherapy sessions and the knee strength LSI or the Lysholm score. Prolonging patient physiotherapy sessions after 3 months post-ACL reconstruction seems ineffective in improving knee strength recovery and function. Full article
11 pages, 413 KB  
Article
Delayed Meniscus Repair Lowers the Functional Outcome of Primary ACL Reconstruction
by Patrick Sadoghi, Harald K. Widhalm, Martin F. Fischmeister, Lukas Leitner, Andreas Leithner and Stefan F. Fischerauer
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(5), 1325; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13051325 - 26 Feb 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 5523
Abstract
Background: Our purpose was to evaluate whether the time of intervention and the type of meniscus surgery (repair vs. partial meniscectomy) play a role in managing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions with concurrent meniscus pathologies. Methods: We performed a prospective cohort study which [...] Read more.
Background: Our purpose was to evaluate whether the time of intervention and the type of meniscus surgery (repair vs. partial meniscectomy) play a role in managing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions with concurrent meniscus pathologies. Methods: We performed a prospective cohort study which differentiated between early and late ACL reconstructions with a cut-off at 3 months. Patients were re-evaluated after 2 years. Results: Thirty-nine patients received an operation between 2–12 weeks after the injury, and thirty patients received the surgery between 13–28 weeks after trauma. The strongest negative predictive factor of the International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee form in a hierarchical regression model was older age (ß = −0.49 per year; 95% CI [−0.91; −0.07]; p = 0.022; partial R2 = 0.08)). The strongest positive predictive factor was a higher preoperative Tegner score (ß = 3.6; 95% CI [0.13; 7.1]; p = 0.042; partial R2 = 0.07) and an interaction between meniscus repair surgery and the time of intervention (ß = 27; 95% CI [1.6; 52]; p = 0.037; partial R2 = 0.07), revealing a clinical meaningful difference as to whether meniscus repairs were performed within 12 weeks after trauma or were delayed. There was no difference whether partial meniscectomy was performed early or delayed. Conclusions: Surgical timing plays a crucial role when surgeons opt for a meniscus repair rather than for a meniscectomy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Knee Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 5815 KB  
Article
rAAV TGF-β and FGF-2 Overexpression via pNaSS-Grafted PCL Films Stimulates the Reparative Activities of Human ACL Fibroblasts
by Mahnaz Amini, Jagadeesh K. Venkatesan, Tuan N. Nguyen, Wei Liu, Amélie Leroux, Henning Madry, Véronique Migonney and Magali Cucchiarini
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(13), 11140; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241311140 - 6 Jul 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2094
Abstract
Lesions in the human anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) are frequent, unsolved clinical issues due to the limited self-healing ability of the ACL and lack of treatments supporting full, durable ACL repair. Gene therapy guided through the use of biomaterials may steadily activate the [...] Read more.
Lesions in the human anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) are frequent, unsolved clinical issues due to the limited self-healing ability of the ACL and lack of treatments supporting full, durable ACL repair. Gene therapy guided through the use of biomaterials may steadily activate the processes of repair in sites of ACL injury. The goal of the present study was to test the hypothesis that functionalized poly(sodium styrene sulfonate)-grafted poly(ε-caprolactone) (pNaSS-grafted PCL) films can effectively deliver recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) vectors as a means of overexpressing two reparative factors (transforming growth factor beta-TGF-β and basic fibroblast growth factor-FGF-2) in primary human ACL fibroblasts. Effective, durable rAAV reporter red fluorescent protein and candidate TGF-β and FGF-2 gene overexpression was achieved in the cells for at least 21 days, especially when pNaSS-grafted PCL films were used versus control conditions, such as ungrafted films and systems lacking vectors or films (between 1.8- and 5.2-fold differences), showing interactive regulation of growth factor production. The expression of TGF-β and FGF-2 from rAAV via PCL films safely enhanced extracellular matrix depositions of type-I/-III collagen, proteoglycans/decorin, and tenascin-C (between 1.4- and 4.5-fold differences) in the cells over time with increased levels of expression of the specific transcription factors Mohawk and scleraxis (between 1.7- and 3.7-fold differences) and without the activation of the inflammatory mediators IL-1β and TNF-α, most particularly with pNaSS-grafted PCL films relative to the controls. This work shows the value of combining rAAV gene therapy with functionalized PCL films to enhance ACL repair. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1422 KB  
Article
Primary Proximal ACL Repair: A Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Arthroscopic Suture Configurations
by Steffen B. Rosslenbroich, Andrea Achtnich, Cathrin Brodkorb, Clemens Kösters, Carolin Kreis, Sebastian Metzlaff, Benedikt Schliemann and Wolf Petersen
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(6), 2340; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062340 - 17 Mar 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2348
Abstract
Purpose: Several suture techniques have been described in the past for direct ACL repair with poor healing capacity and a high re-rupture rate. Therefore, we investigated a refixation technique for acute primary proximal ACL repair. The purpose of this study is to [...] Read more.
Purpose: Several suture techniques have been described in the past for direct ACL repair with poor healing capacity and a high re-rupture rate. Therefore, we investigated a refixation technique for acute primary proximal ACL repair. The purpose of this study is to compare the biomechanical properties of different suture configurations using a knotless anchor. Methods: In this study, 35 fresh-frozen porcine knees underwent proximal ACL refixation. First, in 10 porcine femora, the biomechanical properties of the knotless anchor, without the ligament attached, were tested. Then, three different suture configurations were evaluated to reattach the remaining ACL. Using a material testing machine, the structural properties were evaluated for cyclic loading followed by loading to failure. Results: The ultimate failure load of the knotless anchor was 198, 76 N ± 23, 4 N significantly higher than all of the tested ACL suture configurations. Comparing the different configurations, the modified Kessler–Bunnell suture showed significant superior ultimate failure load, with 81, 2 N ± 15, 6 N compared to the twofold and single sutures (50, 5 N ± 14 N and 37, 5 ± 3, 8 N). In cyclic loading, there was no significant difference noted for the different configurations in terms of stiffness and elongation. Conclusions: The results of this in vitro study show that when performing ACL suture using a knotless anchor, a modified Kessler–Bunnell suture provides superior biomechanical properties than a single and a twofold suture. Within this construct, no failure at the bone–anchor interface was seen. Clinical relevance: Since primary suture repair techniques of ACL tears have been abandoned because of inconsistent results, ACL reconstruction remains the gold standard of treating ACL tears. However, with the latest improvements in surgical techniques, instrumentation, hardware and imaging, primary ACL suture repair might be a treatment option for a select group of patients. By establishing an arthroscopic technique in which proximal ACL avulsion can be reattached, the original ACL can be preserved by using a knotless anchor and a threefold suture configuration. Nevertheless, this technique provides an inferior ultimate failure load compared to graft techniques, so a careful rehabilitation program must be followed if using this technique in vivo. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Treatment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 5235 KB  
Article
The Comparison of Clinical Result between Primary Repair of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament with Additional Internal Bracing and Anatomic Single Bundle Reconstruction—A Retrospective Study
by Dawid Szwedowski, Łukasz Paczesny, Jan Zabrzyński, Maciej Gagat, Marcin Domżalski, Gazi Huri and Wojciech Widuchowski
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(17), 3948; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10173948 - 31 Aug 2021
Cited by 27 | Viewed by 4063
Abstract
Background: The current standard of treatment of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is reconstruction (ACLR). This technique has some disadvantages: poor proprioception, donor site morbidity and the inability to restore joint kinematics. ACL repair could be an alternative treatment. The purpose of the study [...] Read more.
Background: The current standard of treatment of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is reconstruction (ACLR). This technique has some disadvantages: poor proprioception, donor site morbidity and the inability to restore joint kinematics. ACL repair could be an alternative treatment. The purpose of the study was to compare the stability and the function after ACL primary repair versus single-bundle ACLR. Methods: In a retrospective study, 12 patients underwent primary ACL repair with internal bracing, 15 patients underwent standard ACLR. Follow-up examinations were evaluated at up to 2 years postoperatively. One patient in the ACL repair group was lost to follow-up due to re-rupture. The absolute value of anterior tibial translation (ATT) and the side-to-side difference in the same patient (ΔATT) were evaluated using the GNRB arthrometer. The Lysholm knee scoring was obtained. Re-ruptures and other complications were recorded. Results: Anterior tibial translation (ATT) was significantly decreased in the ACL repair group compared with the ACLR group (5.31 mm vs. 7.18 mm, respectively; p = 0.0137). Arthrometric measurements demonstrated a mean side-to-side difference (ΔATT) 1.87 (range 0.2 to 4.9) mm significantly decreased compared to ACLR 3.36 (range 1.2–5.6 mm; p = 0.0107). The mean Lysholm score was 85.3 points in the ACL repair group and 89.9 in ACLR group. No significant differences between ACL repair and ACLR were found for the Lysholm score. There was no association between AP laxity and clinical outcomes. There were two complications in the internal bracing group: one patient had re-rupture and was treated by ACLR, another had limited extension and had arthroscopic debridement. Conclusions: Anterior tibial translation was significantly decreased after ACL repair. Additionally, the functional results after ACL repair with internal bracing were comparable with those after ACLR. It should be noted that the two complications occurred. The current study supports further development of ACL repair techniques. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis and Management of Knee Injuries)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1131 KB  
Review
ACL Repair: A Game Changer or Will History Repeat Itself? A Critical Appraisal
by Christiaan H. W. Heusdens
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(5), 912; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10050912 - 26 Feb 2021
Cited by 36 | Viewed by 9606
Abstract
Until the past decade the common thought was that the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) was not able to heal and restore knee stability. In this manuscript a brief review of studies of the developers and the early adaptors of four different modern ACL [...] Read more.
Until the past decade the common thought was that the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) was not able to heal and restore knee stability. In this manuscript a brief review of studies of the developers and the early adaptors of four different modern ACL repair techniques are presented. The present status and considerations for the future of ACL repair and its research are shared. After promising short- to midterm ACL healing results by the developers, the results of the early adaptors show more variety in terms of rerupture and reintervention for other reasons. Risk factors for failure are a young age, high preinjury sports activity level, midsubstance ruptures and impaired integrity of the ACL bundles and the synovial sheath. There is a call for more clinical data and randomized clinical trials. Conclusion: an important finding of the past decade is that the ACL is able to heal and subsequently restabilize the knee. Patient selection is emphasized: the ideal patient is a non-high athlete older than 25 and has an acute proximal one bundle ACL rupture. Further research will have to show if ACL repair could be a game changer or if history will repeat itself. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis and Management of Knee Injuries)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 16140 KB  
Article
Good to Excellent Functional Short-Term Outcome and Low Revision Rates Following Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair Using Suture Augmentation
by Kristian Nikolaus Schneider, Benedikt Schliemann, Georg Gosheger, Christoph Theil, Jan Weller, Pranai K Buddhdev and Georg Ahlbäumer
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(10), 3068; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103068 - 23 Sep 2020
Cited by 24 | Viewed by 3563
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the functional outcome of primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair using suture augmentation (SA) in 93 consecutive patients (67 female) with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Patients’ outcomes were determined using International Knee Documentation [...] Read more.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the functional outcome of primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair using suture augmentation (SA) in 93 consecutive patients (67 female) with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Patients’ outcomes were determined using International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score (LS) and Tegner score (TS). Knee-laxity was assessed using the KT-1000 arthrometer. Eighty-eight patients (67 female, mean age 42 years ± standard deviation (SD) 13) were available for follow-up after a mean time of 21 months (range 12–39). Three patients (3%) underwent revision surgery and were excluded from functional analysis. The mean IKDC score was 87.4 ± 11, mean LS was 92.6 ± 11, mean pre-traumatic TS was 6 ± 2 and mean postoperative TS was 6 ± 2, with a mean difference (TSDiff) of 1 ± 1. The interval from injury to surgery had no significant impact on the postoperative IKDC (p = 0.228), LS (p = 0.377) and TSDiff (p = 0.572). Patients’ age (>40 years), BMI (>30) and coexisting ligament or meniscal injuries did not seem to influence postoperative functional results. Primary ACL repair using SA provides good to excellent functional outcomes with a low probability of revision surgery at a minimum of 12 months. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Orthopedics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop