Search Results (8)

Background/Objectives: Adolescence is a critical period for executive function (EF) maturation. While sleep and physical activity (PA) are key lifestyle factors, their longitudinal impact on EF in ecologically valid settings is insufficiently characterised. This study examined the associations between objectively measured sleep duration, daily steps, and EF performance across one academic year (~9 months). Methods: A longitudinal study was conducted with 168 Spanish adolescents (13–16 years). Sleep duration and daily steps were monitored using Fitbit Charge 6 wearables for 7-day periods at baseline (M1; September 2024) and follow-up (M2; June 2025). EFs were assessed using three validated tasks: Stroop (inhibitory control), Psychomotor Vigilance Task-Brief (PVT-B; sustained attention), and Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT; working memory). Linear Mixed Models (LMM) were employed to analyse the effects of the fixed factors (i.e., Group and Time), and their interactions. Results: PA, but not sleep duration, significantly predicted executive performance. The High_PA group demonstrated faster reaction times in inhibitory control (p = 0.007) and significantly fewer attentional lapses in sustained attention (p = 0.014). In contrast, sleep duration showed no significant main effects on EF domains (p > 0.05). Regression analyses confirmed that higher daily steps predicted faster reaction times in inhibitory control in the total sample (r = −0.173, p = 0.002), although an unexpected positive association was observed in the Low_PA group for inhibitory control, warranting cautious interpretation. Conclusions: These findings suggest that habitual PA is associated with better EF performance in adolescents, whereas sleep duration alone (without considering timing or variability) showed no significant associations with cognitive outcomes. Sensitivity analyses using clinically informed thresholds and continuous standardised predictors confirmed the robustness of these findings. Full article

Background/Objectives: Performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is cognitively demanding, often requiring helpers to perform cognitive and manual tasks simultaneously. While the human brain primarily switches between tasks rather than processing them simultaneously, it remains unclear whether performing repetitive, monotonous manual tasks, such as chest compressions, affects cognitive performance. This study aimed to assess the impact of chest compressions on mental arithmetic performance. Methods: In a randomized crossover trial, healthy participants trained in advanced life support (physicians, nurses, and paramedics) completed the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) under two conditions: with or without performing chest compressions on a manikin. The primary outcome was the number of correct PASAT answers. Secondary outcomes included workload assessment using the NASA Task Load Index (TLX) and chest compression (CC) performance. The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov and approved by the local ethics committee. Results: Thirty-eight participants were included. The number of correct PASAT responses was significantly lower during chest compressions compared to the control (36.5 vs. 41; p < 0.01). NASA TLX values were significantly higher in the chest compression condition, indicating increased perceived workload. Chest compression performance showed statistically significant differences between a phase of just chest compressions and during the PASAT, especially increased levels of incomplete recoil. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that even a simple repetitive motor task like chest compressions impairs cognitive task performance significantly. Furthermore, multitasking was shown to decrease chest compression quality. These findings strongly highlight the importance of effective task allocation and minimizing multitasking during CPR to optimize performance and thereby patient outcomes. Full article

Cognitive loads impact postural control; however, the specific influence of sensory modalities employed in cognitive tasks during motor-cognitive dual tasks remains unclear. This study investigated the distinct effects of visual and auditory cognitive tasks on static postural control while controlling for differences in task content. Twenty-five healthy young adults were instructed to maintain a quiet stance on a force plate under three cognitive task conditions: a single motor task (control), a paced visual serial addition task (visual), and a paced auditory serial addition task (auditory). Center of pressure (COP) displacements were measured, and both linear (e.g., sway area) and non-linear assessments of postural control were analyzed. Results revealed a significant reduction in sway area during cognitive tasks compared to the control condition. However, under the auditory condition, the power spectrum density of COP displacements in the moderate frequency band was significantly higher than those in the control and visual conditions, accompanied by a notable increase in the mean power frequency. These findings suggest that auditory cognitive load exerts a more significant effect on postural control than visual cognitive load during motor-cognitive dual tasks. This highlights the relevance of sensory modalities in cognitive loads for effective fall-risk assessment. Full article

Early cognitive impairment (CI) detection is crucial in multiple sclerosis (MS). However, it can progress silently regardless of relapse activity and reach an advanced stage. We aimed to determine whether the corpus callosum area (CCA) is a sensitive and feasible marker for CI in MS compared to other neuroimaging markers. We assessed cognitive function in 77 MS patients using the Symbol Digit Modalities Test, Paced Auditory Serial Additions Task, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-IV, and Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised. The neuroimaging markers included manually measured CCA, two diffusion tensor imaging markers, and nine volumetric measurements. Apart from volumes of the hippocampus and cerebellum, ten markers showed a significant correlation with all neuropsychological tests and significant differences between the groups. The normalized CCA demonstrated a moderate-to-strong correlation with all neuropsychological tests and successfully differentiated between the CI and cognitively normal groups with 80% sensitivity and 83% specificity. The marker had a large area under the curve and a high Youden index (0.82 and 0.63, respectively) and comparability with established cognitive markers. Therefore, the normalized CCA may serve as a reliable marker for CI in MS and can be easily implemented in clinical practice, providing a supportive diagnostic tool for CI in MS. Full article

Introduction. Cognitive impairment represents one of the most hidden and disabling clinical aspects of multiple sclerosis (MS). In this regard, the major challenges are represented by the need for a comprehensive and standardised cognitive evaluation of each patient, both at disease onset and during follow-up, and by the lack of clear-cut data on the effects of treatments. In the present review, we summarize the current evidence on the effects of the available oral disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) on cognitive outcome measures. Materials and Methods. In this systematised review, we extract all the studies that reported longitudinally acquired cognitive outcome data on oral DMTs in MS patients. Results. We found 29 studies that evaluated at least one oral DMT, including observational studies, randomised controlled trials, and their extension studies. Most of the studies (n = 20) evaluated sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) modulators, while we found seven studies on dimethyl fumarate, six on teriflunomide, and one on cladribine. The most frequently used cognitive outcome measures were SDMT and PASAT. Most of the studies reported substantial stability or mild improvement in cognitive outcomes in a short-time follow-up (duration of most studies ≤2 years). A few studies also reported MRI measures of brain atrophy. Conclusion. Cognitive outcomes were evaluated only in a minority of prospective studies on oral DMTs in MS patients with variable findings. More solid and numerous data are present for the S1P modulators. A standardised cognitive evaluation remains a yet unmet need to better clarify the possible positive effect of oral DMTs on cognition. Full article

Objective: To explore the characteristics and dynamic evolution of cognitive impairment in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). Methods: Twenty-five patients with acute NMOSD and 30 age-matched healthy individuals were consecutively recruited in this study. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Chinese Version of Rey Auditory Vocabulary Learning Test (CRAVLT), Verbal Fluency Test (VFT), Digital Span Test (DST), Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task 3/2s version (PASAT-3/2), Rey–Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (ROCF) and Stroop Color and Word Test (CWT) were used to evaluate cognitive function. The correlations between cognitive function and serum aquaporin-4 (AQP-4) antibody titer were analyzed. Results: Sixty-four percent of patients with acute NMOSD had cognitive dysfunction. MoCA (p < 0.001), CRAVLT-N7 (p = 0.004), CRAVLT-N8 (p = 0.011), ROCF-C (p = 0.005), ROCF-R (p < 0.001), PASAT-3 (p = 0.013), PASAT-2 (p = 0.001) and CWT-A (p = 0.017) were significantly worse in patients with acute NMOSD than those in control group. During follow-up visits, significant differences of serum AQP-4 antibody titers were still noted in NMOSD patients (p < 0.001), while no significant differences were found by MoCA. Conclusion: A high number of patients with acute NMOSD suffer from cognitive dysfunction. Serum AQP-4 antibody titers can decrease during disease remission, while obvious cognitive decline in these patients still exists. Full article

Cognitive conflict effects are well characterized within unimodality. However, little is known about cross-modal conflicts and their neural bases. This study characterizes the two types of visual and auditory cross-modal conflicts through working memory tasks and brain activities. The participants consisted of 31 healthy, right-handed, young male adults. The Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) and the Paced Visual Serial Addition Test (PVSAT) were performed under distractor and no distractor conditions. Distractor conditions comprised two conditions in which either the PASAT or PVSAT was the target task, and the other was used as a distractor stimulus. Additionally, oxygenated hemoglobin (Oxy-Hb) concentration changes in the frontoparietal regions were measured during tasks. The results showed significantly lower PASAT performance under distractor conditions than under no distractor conditions, but not in the PVSAT. Oxy-Hb changes in the bilateral ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC) and inferior parietal cortex (IPC) significantly increased in the PASAT with distractor compared with no distractor conditions, but not in the PVSAT. Furthermore, there were significant positive correlations between Δtask performance accuracy and ΔOxy-Hb in the bilateral IPC only in the PASAT. Visual cross-modal conflict significantly impairs auditory task performance, and bilateral VLPFC and IPC are key regions in inhibiting visual cross-modal distractors. Full article

While emotion dysregulation has been investigated as a key variable in the development and persistence of personality psychopathology, few studies have explored state emotion dysregulation among individuals with personality disorders (PDs). The current study addresses this void in the literature through a laboratory investigation of state emotion dysregulation among participants with and without PDs. To facilitate this goal, participants were matched to pairs based on similar personality features and were randomized to one of two behavioral analogues; either the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task-Computerized (PASAT-C) or an interpersonally based mood induction. As hypothesized, PD participants in the PASAT-C reported significantly more difficulty with impulsivity and emotion regulation strategies. Contrary to expectations, the PD group in the interpersonal task demonstrated significantly less difficulty with non-acceptance of emotion and emotional clarity and significantly greater positive affect compared to non-PD participants. Implications for these findings and directions for future research are discussed. Full article