Search Results (55)

Thrombophilia is considered one of the key mechanisms underlying reproductive disorders. Clinical heterogeneity of reproductive disorders and a lack of stratification by phenotype often limit interpretation. Therefore, evaluating thrombophilia-associated genetic markers separately in fetal loss syndrome, postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy is essential. Background/Objectives: To assess the frequency of thrombophilia-related genetic polymorphisms in women with various reproductive disorders and evaluate their association with clinical–anamnestic characteristics and obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome. Methods: A total of 132 women with reproductive disorders (fetal loss syndrome, postpartum hemorrhage, preeclampsia). Results: Statistically significant differences were found when comparing between the groups. Thus, heterozygous F13 genetic polymorphisms were statistically more common in the group with a history of preeclampsia compared to the group with PPH (the G/A genotype was detected in 22.2% versus 10.7%, p = 0.045), and heterozygous ITGA2 gene genetic polymorphisms were also more common (the C/T genotype was detected in 66.7% versus 42.9%, p = 0.023). In women with a history of PPH, homozygous ITGA2 genetic polymorphisms were statistically more common (the T/T genotype was detected 2.6 times more often—21.4% versus 8.8% compared to the group with fetal loss syndrome, p = 0.022; and 3.8 times more often—21.4% versus 5.6% compared to the group with PE, p = 0.022). Conclusions: A study of thrombophilia gene polymorphisms in women with reproductive disorders showed that the G/A genotype of F13, the C/T genotype of ITGA2, and the A/G genotype of MTR:2756 were significantly more common in women with preeclampsia than in the group with postpartum hemorrhage; the T/T genotype of the ITGA2 gene was detected in postpartum hemorrhage. The MTHFR 1286A > C (A/C) polymorphism was associated with a reduced risk of postpartum hemorrhage. In contrast, the MTR 2756A > G (A/G) genotype was associated with an increased risk of preeclampsia. Full article

Background: IgM antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) were de-emphasised in the 2023 ACR/EULAR criteria, yet their precise clinical significance remains uncertain. Methods: A rapid scoping review of PubMed (January 2000–June 2025) identified original human studies reporting IgM aCL, aβ₂GPI, or aPS/PT prevalence or outcomes; 40 studies met the eligibility criteria. Prevalence and odds ratios (ORs) of clinical associations were extracted. Results: IgM aPL are common across APS phenotypes. Obstetric cohorts showed aCL-IgM prevalences of 3–82%, often equal to or exceeding those of IgG, while aβ₂GPI-IgM reached a prevalence of 2–63%. In mixed thrombotic–obstetric cohorts, aPS/PT-IgM was the most frequent isotype (31–79%). Purely thrombotic studies still reported 0–59% aβ₂GPI-IgM, with PS/PT-IgM at 55% and 62% in two large series. Significant outcome signals from clinical associations of IgM aPL were inconsistent but noteworthy in (i) pregnancy loss for high-titre aCL, aβ₂GPI, and aPS/PT, (ii) thrombosis driven by aPS/PT and (iii) organ-specific arterial events (retinal thrombosis and stroke) in isolated IgM phenotypes. Conclusions: The role of aPL-IgM remains uncertain. The findings advocate for a nuanced approach to IgM interpretation, supporting its reconsideration in specific clinical settings and emphasising the significance of ongoing research into the mechanistic and prognostic utility of IgM aPL. Full article

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by venous and arterial thrombosis and obstetric complications, driven by antiphospholipid antibodies (APLAs). This review synthesizes the latest advancements and current understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of APS. APLAs, including lupus anticoagulant (LAC), anticardiolipin (aCL), and anti-β2-glycoprotein I (aβ2-GPI), interfere with coagulation and endothelial function, as well as with placental health. APS can be primary or secondary; it is often associated with systemic autoimmune diseases like lupus. The pathogenesis of APS remains only partially understood. APLAs promote thrombosis through endothelial damage, platelet activation, and inflammatory signaling pathways. Laboratory diagnosis relies on persistent positivity for APLAs and LAC through tests like ELISA and clotting assays, following a three-step confirmation process. New integrated test systems have been introduced to improve standardization. Classification criteria have evolved, with the 2023 EULAR-ACR criteria providing a weighted, domain-based scoring system, enhancing diagnostic precision. Catastrophic APS (CAPS) is a severe, rare manifestation of APS, characterized by multi-organ failure due to rapid, widespread microthrombosis and systemic inflammation, which requires urgent anticoagulation. Seronegative APS is proposed for patients with clinical features of APS but negative standard antibody tests, possibly due to non-criteria antibodies or transient immunosuppression. Treatment primarily involves long-term anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists; direct oral anticoagulants are generally not recommended. APS diagnosis and management remain complex due to clinical heterogeneity and laboratory challenges. Continued refinement of diagnostic tools and criteria is essential for improving outcomes in this life-threatening condition. Full article

Background: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is one of the highest risk factors for obstetric complications. This article contains a case report of a patient with obstetric APS who experienced fetal loss during their first pregnancy and experienced a successful second pregnancy upon treatment with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). We compare placental pathology in these two pregnancies and discuss the impact of antiphospholipid antibodies and clinical management on pregnancy outcomes. We also propose methods to monitor obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (OAPS) patients during pregnancy. Methods: A 26-year-old woman presented with a history of stillbirth at 25 weeks of pregnancy due to placental insufficiency. Before pregnancy, she experienced symptoms suggestive of autoimmune disease (thrombocytopenia, recurrent mouth aphthous ulcers, and Raynaud’s phenomenon) but had no diagnosis. Placental dysfunction correlated with the high ratio of sFlt-1/PIGF (soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 and the placental growth factors index). Laboratory tests revealed the presence of antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) and triple positivity for antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs). Results: Following the initiation of treatment for OAPS and regular monitoring consistent with current guidelines, the patient conceived and successfully delivered a healthy child. Conclusions: Adequate therapy and close monitoring during pregnancy, including clinical observation, placental biomarkers and regular ultrasonography, may help to reduce the risks and increase chances for optimal pregnancy outcomes. Additionally, pathological examination and clinical collaboration are essential components in future pregnancy counseling and should be a part of multidisciplinary management. Full article

Background/Objectives: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by thrombosis or obstetric complications and the laboratory detection of antiphospholipid antibodies. Although vascular thrombosis is the main manifestation of the disease, other rarer complications have also been described. Avascular necrosis (AN) is considered a rare manifestation of APS. The aim of our case series is to study patients with APS and AN. Methods: A retrospective study was performed on 80 patients diagnosed with APS. Results: AN was observed in 3 patients out of 80 diagnosed with APS. AN of the femoral head was observed in all cases. Case (1): A 54-year-old woman presented due to multiple ischemic infarctions in the brain, as detected in magnetic resonance imaging of the brain, Raynaud’s phenomenon, and AN of the femoral head. In laboratory testing, a prolongation of activated partial thromboplastin time was recorded. A heterozygous mutation was also found in the gene MTHFR C677T, and the patients was positive for lupus anticoagulant (LA). The patient was given clopidogrel and acenocoumarol. Case (2): A 52-year-old man was diagnosed with APS, based on the clinical presentation (stroke) and positivity for LA and anti-β2GPI (anti-β2 glycoprotein I antibody). In his medical history, episodes of vertigo and an episode of AN of the femoral head 2 years ago were described. Case (3): A woman aged 43 years presented due to AN of the femoral head. Due to suspected APS, immunological testing was performed, and positivity for LA and IgM anticardiolipin antibodies was detected. She was treated with acenocoumarol. Conclusions: AN is a rare clinical manifestation of APS, which may precede the diagnosis of APS for many years. Full article

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a rare autoimmune disease characterized by thrombosis and obstetric complications. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) of either platelet and endothelial origin are recognized to be involved in the pathophysiology of the disease. This study aimed to evaluate the potential role of endothelial- and platelet-derived extracellular vesicles and the clinical features or progression of APS. We enrolled 22 patients diagnosed with APS and 18 age and sex-matched healthy controls. We determined APS-specific antibody positivity and clinical manifestations in APS affected patients, with a focus on neurological, cardiovascular, dermatological, hematological manifestations, and pregnancy-related complications. Platelet-poor plasma was collected from either patients and controls for the analysis of EVs by flow cytometry technology using monoclonal antibodies to specifically identify those derived from either platelets and/or endothelial cells. EVs of endothelial and platelet origins were overall significantly increased in patients as compared to healthy controls. Furthermore, a significant association was also observed between the number of extracellular vesicles and specific organ involvement, particularly central nervous system manifestations, hematological abnormalities, and obstetric complications. An elevated proportion of endothelial-derived EVs in APS and a reduction of resting endothelial cell-derived EVs were observed in APS-affected women with obstetric complications. Our findings highlight the involvement of endothelial cells and platelets in mirroring the activities of endothelial cells and platelets in APS. Additionally, extracellular vesicles may serve as potential predictors of organ involvement and disease-related damage. Full article

Introduction: The classification of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) comprises clinical criteria (vascular thrombosis or obstetric complications throughout life) and laboratory criteria (antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) positivity, confirmed at least twice at 12-week interval). Methods: In 100 patients admitted to the hospital with COVID-19 pneumonia, thrombosis and pregnancy complications were recorded during the hospital stay and in personal medical history. They were tested for nine types of aPLs at four time points (admission, deterioration, discharge, and 3-month follow-up): anticardiolipin (aCL), anti-β2-glycoproteinI (anti-β2GPI), and antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin (aPS/PT) isotypes IgM/IgG/IgA. Results: During hospitalization, aPLs were detected at least once in 51% of patients. All 7% of deceased patients tested negative for aPLs upon admission, and only one patient became aCL IgG positive as his condition worsened. In 83.3% of patients, intrahospital thrombosis was not related to aPLs. One patient with pulmonary artery and cerebral artery thrombosis was given an APS diagnosis (triple aPLs positivity on admission, double on follow-up). Personal anamnesis (PA) for thromboembolism was verified in 10 patients, all of whom tested negative for aPLs at admission; however, transition to aPLs positivity at discharge (as the disease subsided) was seen in 60% of patients: three of six with arterial thrombosis (at follow-up, two did not appear, and one was negativized) and three of four with deep vein thrombosis (one was confirmed at follow-up and diagnosed with APS, one was negativized, and one did not appear). At admission, the majority of the aPLs were of the aCL IgG class (58.8%). Unexpectedly, as the COVID-19 disease decreased, anti-β2GPI IgG antibodies (linked with thromboses) became newly positive at discharge (14.9%), as confirmed at follow-up (20.8%). Conclusion: The incidence of APS in our cohort was 2.0%, whereas in the general population, it ranges from 0.001% to 0.002%. The incidence might have increased even more if the four aPLs-positive patients with intrahospital thrombosis/history of thrombosis had attended follow-up. Recommendation: All patients with severe COVID-19 or post-COVID syndrome should be evaluated for current/previous thrombosis and tested for aPLs at least twice: at admission to the hospital and at discharge, then retested 3 months later in positive cases in order to be given the appropriate therapy. Full article

Women with adverse pregnancy outcomes suggestive of obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (OAPS), but not fulfilling clinical and/or laboratory international classification criteria, are increasingly recognized both in clinical practice and in the literature. This entity is termed non-criteria OAPS (NC-OAPS). It includes clinical scenarios such as two unexplained pregnancy losses, three non-consecutive pregnancy losses, late pre-eclampsia/eclampsia/signs of placental insufficiency, or recurrent implantation failure, as well as positive low-titers of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) and non-classical aPLs. To address the NC-OAPS heterogeneity, a nomenclature proposal was developed. In recent years, retrospective and prospective cohort studies have been designed to clarify the characteristics and outcomes of the different subsets of NC-OAPS. In general, the studies support that NC-OAPS may benefit from treatment with antithrombotic, anticoagulant and/or immunomodulator agents, but several considerations must be made on the robustness and nuances of the scientific evidence. The objective of this review is to critically analyze the available evidence supporting the diagnosis of NC-OAPS, categorize its subsets, and evaluate the impact of treatment strategies on its outcome. We also remark on questions that are still unanswered, such as the lack of consensus on diagnostic criteria or treatment protocols. Full article

Background: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a rare systemic autoimmune disease characterized by persistent antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) in combination with recurrent thrombosis in the veins and/or arteries, obstetric morbidity, and various non-thrombotic associated complications. APS can be primary, as an isolated condition, or secondary in the context of another autoimmune disease, especially systemic lupus erythematosus. This comprehensive clinical review aims to summarize the current understanding of APS pathogenesis, diagnostic approaches, and treatment strategies for this unique clinical entity. Methods: A comprehensive review of the existing literature on APS was conducted, focusing on pathophysiological mechanisms, current diagnostic criteria, and therapeutic approaches. Results: APS pathogenesis involves complex interactions between aPL, phospholipid-binding proteins, and the coagulation cascade. Apart from the cardinal features of thrombosis and APS-related obstetric morbidity, APS is associated with a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations. Diagnosis remains challenging due to overlapping symptoms with other conditions, and clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion in order to set the diagnosis. The recently published 2023 ACR/EULAR criteria although not definitive for clinical decision-making, these criteria offer clinicians a valuable tool to aid in determining whether further investigation for APS is warranted. Continued refinement of these criteria through ongoing feedback and updates is anticipated. Treatment strategies center on anticoagulation, but individualized approaches are necessary. Conclusions: Early diagnosis and multidisciplinary management of APS are critical to reducing morbidity and improving outcomes. Moreover, familiarization with the 2023 ACR/EULAR criteria is encouraged, recognizing that ongoing feedback and updates will contribute to their ongoing refinement and improvement. While VKAs remain the mainstay of treatment for most APS patients further research is needed to optimize treatment strategies and deepen our understanding of APS’s underlying disease mechanisms. Full article

Background: The clinical and laboratory features of patients with non-criteria obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (NC-OAPS), as well as their pregnancy outcomes and ideal treatment are not clearly determined. The aim of this study is to describe the characteristics and outcomes of pregnancies in NC-OAPS and compare them with an obstetric APS (OAPS) cohort. Methods: This is a retrospective study conducted on a cohort of women referred to a high-risk obstetric unit of a tertiary hospital. Women that were classified as having OAPS or NC-OAPS were included and compared in terms of clinical and laboratory characteristics, management, and subsequent pregnancy outcomes. Results: We identified 107 women with 143 pregnancies, 91 with NC-OAPS and 16 with OAPS. There were no differences in demographic features between both groups. Women with NC-OAPS were more likely to have recurrent implantation failure and were predominantly positive for a single antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) subtype. Both groups were treated similarly (low dose aspirin plus low molecular weight heparin in 87.4% of NC-OAPS and 83.3% of OAPS, p > 0.05). Live birth rate (82.4% and 75.0%, respectively, p > 0.05) and adverse pregnancy outcomes (31.6% vs. 37.5%, p > 0.05) in subsequent pregnancies during follow-up were also similar between groups. Conclusions: This study revealed differences in the previous pregnancy morbidity and aPL profiles in women with NC-OAPS and OAPS, although the therapeutic approach and the outcomes of subsequent pregnancies were similar in both groups. Full article

Objectives: Current guidelines recommend systematic screening for rheumatic diseases (RDs), including antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). However, these recommendations are based on limited evidence, as data on the prevalence of RD in this specific population remain scarce. In particular, the impact of the recent update to the ACR/EULAR classification criteria for APS on the prevalence of RD among RPL patients has yet to be clarified. To address these gaps, this study aims to (i) assess the impact of the 2023 ACR/EULAR APS classification criteria in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL); and (ii) analyze the prevalence of RD in these patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at Rennes University Hospital. From January 2010 to December 2021, all patients referred to the Clinical Immunology Department for RPL were included. Patients were eligible if they had undergone a full RPL evaluation, according to guidelines. Results: We included 165 women with RPL. APS according to the Sydney criteria was found in 24 (14.5%) patients. No significant differences in obstetric history or clinical signs were observed between APS-positive and APS-negative individuals. Only two patients fulfilled the updated 2023 APS criteria, resulting in 163 (98.8%) patients being classified as having unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss (uRPL). Among them, 108 had a new pregnancy following uRPL, resulting in 87 (81%) live births and 21 (19%) recurrent miscarriages. We did not identify any prognostic factor associated with subsequent pregnancy outcomes, including the patients’ antiphospholipid biological profile. We found a prevalence of non-APS RD of only 2.4% in the study population, including systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, and Behçet’s disease. Conclusions: APS was identified in 14.5% of the patients based on the former Sydney criteria and 1.2% according to the revised criteria. The lack of clinical differences between APS and non-APS patients aligns with previously reported limitations of the Sydney criteria in accurately identifying aPLA-related RPL. According to the rarity of APS as per the updated criteria, future large collaborative trials will be needed to further characterize APS-related RPL patients and to determine the best treatment strategy for future pregnancies. Full article

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a thrombo-inflammatory disease propelled by circulating autoantibodies that recognize cell surface phospholipids and phospholipid-binding proteins. APS is an autoimmune disorder associated with recurrent thrombosis of arterial or venous vessels and/or recurrent obstetric complications as miscarriages. APS can be divided into primary or secondary clinical syndrome because of the possible association with other autoimmune systemic diseases as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Vitamin K antagonists remain the mainstay of treatment for most patients with APS and, based on current data, appear superior to the more targeted direct oral anticoagulants. However, the choice of the type of antithrombotic drug is based on the anamnesis of affected patients: patients with previous arterial or venous thrombosis may benefit from anticoagulants, while patients with previous obstetric diseases may benefit from aspirin, but several clinical exceptions may be evaluated. This short review is dedicated to underlining the main clinical evidence for patients affected by APS or CAPS (catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome) in order to prevent recurrent thrombosis. Full article

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), also known as Hughes syndrome, is a systemic autoimmune disorder characterized by recurrent thrombosis and pregnancy complications, accompanied by the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs). These antibodies target anionic phospholipids or protein–phospholipid complexes within cell membranes, contributing to the underlying mechanisms of the disease. Although anticoagulation therapy remains the cornerstone of APS management, it often fails to prevent complications, particularly in obstetric and thrombotic cases. As autoimmune diseases become increasingly linked to alterations in the gut microbiome, this study investigates the complex interaction between gut bacteria and immune modulation in APS. We explore how disruptions in the gut microbiome may influence the development of autoimmune conditions, with a specific focus on APS. By identifying key microorganisms potentially involved in this gut–immune axis, we aim to provide insights into novel preventive and control approaches. Future research should focus on harnessing the gut microbiome to develop more effective treatments that target both the immune system and microbial populations in APS patients. Full article

Background/Objectives: Our aim was to validate the performance of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) classification criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), published in 2023, in an APS cohort. Methods: A total of 193 patients, 83 with APS (secondary APS, n = 45; primary APS, n = 38) and 110 without APS (systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), n = 100; others, n = 10), were included in this study. The performance (sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (AUC)) of the 2023 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for APS was evaluated and the agreement with the revised Sapporo criteria was compared using the kappa test. Results: In our cohort, the sensitivity and specificity of the 2023 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for APS were 73% and 94%, respectively (AUC: 0.836, 95% CI: 0.772–0.899), while the sensitivity and specificity of the revised Sapporo criteria were 66% and 98%, respectively (95% CI: 0.756–0.888). The performance of the two sets of criteria in our cohort was significantly consistent and significant (p < 0.001). When the sensitivity, specificity and ROC curve analysis were performed again by excluding livedo racemosa, the sensitivity of the new criteria in our cohort was 62% and the specificity was 100% (AUC: 0.813, 95% CI: 0.746–0.881). Conclusions: Although the newly published criteria broaden the scope of APS classification by including clinical findings other than thrombosis and obstetric criteria, their sensitivity in our cohort was low. On the other hand, we found that the specificity of the criteria in our cohort reached 100% when livedo findings were excluded. Full article

Background/Objectives: ACR/EULAR has recently developed new classification criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). The present study aims to analyze the impact of these new 2023 ACR/EULAR classification criteria in a cohort of pregnant women with primary APS. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of 93 consecutive pregnant women attending the Autoimmune Diseases Pregnancy Clinic, a multidisciplinary unit of a tertiary care teaching hospital, between 2005 and 2023. All of them fulfilled the Sydney classification criteria for APS. Women diagnosed with rheumatic autoimmune diseases other than APS were excluded. Results: Twenty-four out of ninety-three patients (25.8%) met the 2023 ACR/EULAR criteria for APS. Patients who met the new classification criteria were very similar to those who did not, except for being younger (p < 0.001), and had a lower number of clinical pregnancies (p = 0.004). The obstetric domain was clearly underrepresented in women who fulfilled the 2023 ACR/EULAR criteria (p < 0.001). Patients meeting the new classification criteria were primarily characterized by preterm births before 34 weeks due to severe placentation disorders (p = 0.004). Women with early and late fetal loss were significantly underrepresented (p < 0.0001 and 0.03, respectively). Nearly half of these patients had thrombocytopenia (p < 0.001). Serologically, these patients showed a higher frequency of persistent lupus anticoagulant (p = 0.02) and a lower frequency of IgM isotype antiphospholipid antibodies (p = 0.05). Conclusions: Almost three-quarters of the patients included in the study did not meet the 2023 ACR/EULAR criteria. Most patients who could not be classified according to these new classification criteria were those with early and/or late fetal deaths, as well as patients carrying only IgM aCL/AB2GPI antibodies. The high specificity of the 2023 ACR/EULAR criteria, restricted to severe placentation disorders, may leave the majority of patients with obstetric APS out of the new classification criteria. Full article